Skip to main content

POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article

Front. Conserv. Sci.
Sec. Conservation Social Sciences
Volume 5 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2024.1497920

The shifting philosophy behind the protected area concept and its applicability in the South

Provisionally accepted
Paul Cryer Paul Cryer 1,2*Şerban Procheş Şerban Procheş 3Dave J Druce Dave J Druce 4
  • 1 University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
  • 2 African Conservation Trust, Hillcrest, South Africa
  • 3 Discipline of Geography, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
  • 4 Welgevonden Game Reserve, Vaalwater, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The necessity of increasing biodiversity conservation efforts has been highlighted by planetary boundary research. Through review and critical thinking, this paper aims to highlight inadequacies within historic and current environmental ideologies, many of which continue to entrench flawed conservation trajectories. The first part of this paper reviews the context in which the term conservation has been viewed within society, particularly between 1950 and the present day, revealing an early preservationist purpose that was embedded within a larger context of environmental plunder. It examines differing social, scientific and economic dimensions as well as certain approaches to environmental awareness within that period, particularly as it applies to the historic and emerging value of protected areas. It does this through the lenses of divergent thinking, including sequential iterations of colonialism, neoliberalism, 'new conservation', convivial conservation and ecocentrism. By juxtaposing the gradual increase in environmental awareness with socio-political and economic milestones within the last 70 years, it illustrates why firstly, truly reformist thinking has not gained traction and secondly, why exploitative and inherently unsustainable forms of environmentalism have endured within policy. By illuminating these factors, the duplicity of certain conservation trajectories is exposed. Contrastingly, some unlikely alliances between previously antagonistic socio-environmental ideologies are introduced. The second part of the paper deals with how emerging environmental principles are being applied (or not) within South Africa's proud conservation history. It asserts that the post-Apartheid transformation within the environmental sector was incomplete, resulting in the retention of both social and environmental exploitation within policy. With the perpetuation of inadequate measures to stem global (and local) biodiversity loss, despite its now obvious need, the paper concludes with a set of actionable recommendations that have general application to conservation policy makers, researchers and practitioners including those within the South African context. The urgency of addressing the transgressed biodiversity planetary boundary amidst inertia preventing rectification provides the motivation underpinning this paper

    Keywords: biodiversity loss, protected areas, Planetary boundaries, ecocentrism, Earth jurisprudence, Convivial conservation, Neoliberalism

    Received: 18 Sep 2024; Accepted: 18 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cryer, Procheş and Druce. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Paul Cryer, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.