Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Conserv. Sci.
Sec. Conservation Social Sciences
Volume 5 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2024.1389930

Views of conservation volunteers and environmental specialists on genetic technologies for pest control in Aotearoa New Zealand

Provisionally accepted
Natalie Jones Natalie Jones 1Ocean Ripeka Mercier Ocean Ripeka Mercier 1*Alan King Hunt Alan King Hunt 1Liam Hemmerling Liam Hemmerling 2Liliana MacDonald Liliana MacDonald 2Joseph Horowitz Joseph Horowitz 2Rafaela Kanli Rafaela Kanli 2Symon Palmer Symon Palmer 3Sara Belcher Sara Belcher 4Phil Lester Phil Lester 5
  • 1 Te Kawa a Māui, School of Māori Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
  • 2 Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
  • 3 Te Kawa a Māui, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
  • 4 School of Science in Society, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
  • 5 Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Pests such as invasive exotic wasps and rats are a serious threat to Aotearoa New Zealand’s native species, and the country has been working to the New Zealand government’s target of eliminating rats, possums and mustelids by 2050. Since current control methods lack the efficiency and scalability to eradicate mammalian predators and pest invertebrates like wasps, gene technologies are being considered and developed as additional methods of control. Social studies to gauge public perceptions on these novel technologies have also been conducted, with a strong emphasis on Indigenous viewpoints and the importance of societal compacts, particularly Te Tiriti o Waitangi (Treaty of Waitangi). Conservation volunteers and environmental specialists are uniquely experienced and positioned to inform decisions on which technologies are developed and how, but 1. what are their views on genetic technologies for pest control and 2. how do they expect gene technology for pest control to be discussed and developed? To help answer these two questions we conducted a new analysis of a dataset of 8199 nationwide survey responses, 23 in-depth surveys of wasp control volunteers, and 18 interviews with rat and wasp control volunteers and environmental experts, using Q-methodology. All of the conservation volunteers, scientists, academics and environmental professionals expect that risks associated with the technology are carefully and fully identified and mitigated against. A majority cautiously support gene technologies for their potential to more effectively control pests. A significant minority supports gene technologies for pest control under certain conditions, most significantly, if Māori as Tiriti partners are also supportive. A smaller minority have doubts and concerns about gene technologies for pest control and raise important considerations for scientists and policy-makers alike. Addressing all of these concerns, supported by Tiriti-based decision-making processes, will facilitate consensus-based discussions and decisions on genetic technology use.

    Keywords: Pest Control, Volunteers, Environmentalists, Māori, Genetic technologies, Qmethodology, Wasps, Rats

    Received: 22 Feb 2024; Accepted: 13 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Jones, Mercier, King Hunt, Hemmerling, MacDonald, Horowitz, Kanli, Palmer, Belcher and Lester. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Ocean Ripeka Mercier, Te Kawa a Māui, School of Māori Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.