ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Commun.
Sec. Health Communication
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1570885
Communicating Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (FBDGs) Culturally Sensitive? A Comparative Argumentation Analysis of the German and Brazil Dietary Guidelines
Provisionally accepted
Imke Helmus
Tina Bartelmeß*- University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To examine the cultural appropriateness and argumentation structure of food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) in Germany and Brazil, with the aim of identifying areas for improvement to better align with sociocultural contexts and enhance their impact on dietary choices and public health. Design: A comparative study utilizing the concepts of cultural health communication and culturally sensitive argumentation to analyze the communication materials of FBDGs in both countries. Setting: The analysis focuses on the national FBDGs and associated communication strategies employed in Germany and Brazil. Participants: The study examines how FBDG materials are communicated to policymakers and the general public in Germany and Brazil, without direct participant involvement. Results: The Brazilian Dietary Guidelines (BDGs) show a more complex and culturally sensitive argumentation structure than the German Dietary Guidelines (GDGs). They incorporate multi-layered reasoning and culturally rooted examples, aligning dietary recommendations closely with Brazilian food traditions and social norms. In contrast, the GDGs emphasize scientific authority and offer more straightforward, less culturally embedded arguments. This highlights the BDGs' stronger alignment with local values and practices.
Keywords: Food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs), Communication, culture, Brazil, Germany, comparative argumentation analysis
Received: 04 Feb 2025; Accepted: 22 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Helmus and Bartelmeß. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tina Bartelmeß, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, 95447, Bavaria, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.