![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Commun.
Sec. Advertising and Marketing Communication
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1545487
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
As virtual influencers gain popularity among Generation Z consumers, companies increasingly rely on these digital personas for brand endorsement. However, little is known about how virtual versus human endorsers influence brand outcomes, especially when considering different product types. This study addresses this gap by examining how Generation Z consumers' brand attitudes are shaped by virtual and human endorsers promoting utilitarian versus hedonic products. Our findings reveal that virtual endorsers generate more favorable brand attitudes for utilitarian products, while human endorsers are more effective for hedonic products. The relationship between endorser type and product type is mediated by perceived consistency, with functional consistency influencing attitudes toward tangible products and self-image consistency influencing attitudes toward hedonic products. These insights offer practical guidance for companies in selecting the most effective brand endorsers based on product type, optimizing marketing strategies to enhance consumer engagement and brand outcomes.
Keywords: virtual endorser, brand attitude, Functional consistency, self-image consistency, product type
Received: 17 Dec 2024; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hu and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jingwei Xia, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.