data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Commun.
Sec. Advertising and Marketing Communication
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1529650
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study explored the effects of using different sized models in social media advertising on advertisement effectiveness and perceived body image. In all, 235 young female participants viewed advertisements containing either idealised (thin) models or non-idealised (plus-sized) models embedded within a simulated Instagram feed. Body Appreciation Scale (BAS) scores were taken pre-exposure and post-exposure to the advertisements. Advertisement effectiveness was measured via brand attitude and memorability of advertising information (free recall and recognition). Participants exposed to non-idealised models demonstrated a significant increase in BAS scores, whereas there was no effect for idealised models. There was a significant main effect of model type on brand attitude and free recall: non-idealised models elicited more positive brand attitudes and higher recall of brands/products compared to idealised models, but no significant effects were found for brand recognition. There was a significant positive relationship between their pre-exposure BAS scores and brand attitude scores. Limitations and implications are discussed.
Keywords: idealised models, non-idealised models, advertisements, body image, body appreciation, brand attitude, free recall, recognition
Received: 17 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Furnham, McClelland and Wallhead. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Adrian Furnham, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.