Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Commun.

Sec. Health Communication

Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1527164

This article is part of the Research Topic Communicating Breastfeeding Benefits and Supporting New Mothers’ Wellbeing: Cross-Cultural Perspectives View all 4 articles

A systematic evaluation and comparison of the consistency of infant safer sleep messaging in Australia

Provisionally accepted
Sarah P Kruse Sarah P Kruse 1*Levita D'Souza Levita D'Souza 1Jeanine Young Jeanine Young 2Hannah G. G. Tuncer Hannah G. G. Tuncer 1
  • 1 Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  • 2 School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    To reduce the occurrence of sudden infant death, organisations have created recommendations about infant safe sleep and shared sleep. With the considerable volume of documents, consistency in messaging is paramount to reduce caregiver confusion and to reduce engagement in practices deemed to be unsafe for their infant. This review aimed to systematically compare recommendations on infant safer sleep, including shared sleep, in Australia. Documents were identified by researchers with subject matter expertise, and through a systematic webpage search. A total of n=32 eligible documents were included from n=26 organisations. If an organisation had separate documents for shared sleeping, both documents were included and reviewed together. Consistency of recommendations were evaluated against the recommendations within the International Society for the Study and Prevention of Perinatal and Infant Death's (ISPID)'s guidelines, while the approach taken to discuss shared sleep Risk Minimisation vs. Risk Elimination was also evaluated using a coding framework. No organisation's document/s contradicted ISPID's recommendations, although there was variation in the quantity of recommendations included. The approaches taken towards shared sleep by organisations were diverse between Risk Elimination and Risk Minimisation. Strategies to engage in safer shared sleep were provided by less than half of the organisations, as was the acknowledgement of familial, cultural, or logistical preferences for shared sleep, or that shared sleep may also occur unintentionally. Most organisations recommended that infants be breastfed but did not discuss the bidirectional link between breastfeeding and shared sleeping. Organisations need to provide consistent messaging on infant safer sleep to avoid public confusion. The adoption of a Risk Minimisation approach with clearer messaging provides considerations for informed choice, and strategies for safer shared sleeping; intentional or unintentional.

    Keywords: infant safer sleep, Co-sleeping, bed-sharing, SIDS, SUDI (sudden unexpected death in infancy), shared sleep

    Received: 12 Nov 2024; Accepted: 12 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Kruse, D'Souza, Young and Tuncer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Sarah P Kruse, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Victoria, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more