![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Commun.
Sec. Media Governance and the Public Sphere
Volume 10 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1429741
This article is part of the Research Topic The Impact of Disinformation on European Public Institutions and Local or Regional Media: Mapping Strategies for Fact-Checking View all 5 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Over the past decade, disinformation has been the subject of intensive analysis, with researchers examining it from a multitude of perspectives. Among the chief architects of disinformation are governments, which often find themselves playing a double-edged role: both fueling the fire with propaganda and manipulative narratives while simultaneously crafting laws and regulations to combat disinformation. This article seeks to unpack a paradoxical dynamic where governments straddle the line between instigators and regulators of disinformation. Drawing insights from cross-country comparative studies, it delves into the interplay between the independence of public and state-controlled media and key factors like democratic quality, media freedom, and public integrity, in nations that have adopted anti-disinformation legislation. The findings unveil that such laws, which frequently curtail press freedom, are predominantly championed by authoritarian regimes or flawed democracies, wielding them as instruments of censorship. What sets alarm bells ringing, however, is the ripple effect of these practices, which are making inroads into countries known for their strong democratic foundations and well-established traditions of media freedom.
Keywords: disinformation, Misinformaion, State media, Government, media freedom, Editorial independence, fake news
Received: 08 May 2024; Accepted: 13 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Dragomir. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Marius Dragomir, Media and Journalism Research Center, London, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.