Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Cognit.
Sec. Memory
Volume 3 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcogn.2024.1505513
This article is part of the Research Topic Synthesizing Memory: Integrating Across Fields and Levels of Scale View all 5 articles

Asking the right questions: interrogating the logic and assumptions of paradigms used to investigate interactions between procedural and declarative memory in category learning

Provisionally accepted
  • Western University, London, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    In this mini-review, the methods used to investigate interactions between procedural and declarative systems in category learning are considered. Methods that were originally used to establish dissociations between memory systems may be biased toward demonstrating competition between them. In contrast, Jacoby's (1991) Process-Dissociation Procedure (PDP) allows researchers to consider the relative contributions of multiple processes involved in task completion. The original PDP was designed to consider the contributions of recall and familiarity to recognition, but the logic of the PDP can be applied to the contributions of procedural and declarative processes in category learning. Suggestions for improving the possibility of detecting cooperation between systems using the PDP are given.

    Keywords: declarative learning, procedural learning, category learning, Process Dissociation Procedure, cooperation

    Received: 03 Oct 2024; Accepted: 11 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kalra. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Priya B. Kalra, Western University, London, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.