Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Clin. Diabetes Healthc.

Sec. Diabetes Nephropathy

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2025.1551088

Prevalence of nephropathy among patients with diabetes mellitus in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Baze University, Abuja, Nigeria
  • 2 First Technical University, Ibadan, Nigeria
  • 3 Federal University, Wukari, Wukari, Taraba, Nigeria
  • 4 Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria
  • 5 Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, University of Medical Sceince, Ondo, Nigeria
  • 6 National Institute of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Abuja, Nigeria
  • 7 McPherson University, Abeokuta, Nigeria
  • 8 Nigerian Institute of Medical Research (NIMR), Lagos, Nigeria
  • 9 Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most frequent microvascular consequences of diabetes, accounting for a significant portion of morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients in Africa. This study aims to report on the prevalence of nephropathy among patients with diabetes mellitus patients in Africa and the risk factors.Methods: This systematic review was reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, and the protocol was pre-registered in PROSPERO with the registration number CRD42024587467. The search was conducted across databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL and Scopus to retrieve studies published between January 2000 and August 2024. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.4.2). The pooled prevalence of nephropathy in patients with diabetes was calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: Thirty-four (34) articles met the inclusion criteria. Only 28 studies were incorporated into the meta-analysis to determine the pooled prevalence of nephropathy among diabetes patients. The findings indicated a pooled prevalence of 21% (95%, CI: 16-28) of nephropathy among diabetes patients. Among type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients, the pooled prevalence of nephropathy is 46% (95%, CI: 18-77, I² = 98%) and 20% (95% CI: 14-27, I² = 98%), respectively. Weighted prevalence of 47%, 31%, 33% and 11% were reported in North Africa, Central Africa, South Africa and West Africa respectively. The result also showed that diabetes patients with hypertension are more than three times at risk of developing nephropathy compared to those without hypertension OR:3.46 (95% CI: 2.61-4.59).The current study showed the prevalence of nephropathy with a significant association with hypertension among diabetic mellitus patients. Higher prevalence in North Africa is likely due to Western cultural impacts on dietary consumption.

    Keywords: nephropathy, Africa, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Prevalence

    Received: 10 Jan 2025; Accepted: 01 Apr 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Adebayo-Gege, Adegbola, Adedayo, Oyefabi, Oyeyemi, Olubukola, Oke, Okeke, Abodunrin, Akinsolu and Sobande. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Peter Ifeoluwa Adegbola, First Technical University, Ibadan, Nigeria

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more