Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Clin. Diabetes Healthc., 08 January 2025
Sec. Diabetes, Lifestyle and Metabolic Syndrome

Altered kidney function in fatty liver disease: confronting the “MAFLD-renal syndrome”

Suleiman Al AshiSuleiman Al Ashi1Ali A. Rizvi*Ali A. Rizvi2*Manfredi Rizzo,Manfredi Rizzo3,4
  • 1Endocrinology Fellow, UCF COM HCA Healthcare GME – Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism Fellowship Orlando VA Healthcare System, Orlando, FL, United States
  • 2Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Orlando VA Medical Center and University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, United States
  • 3School of Medicine, Promise Department, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
  • 4Department of Medicine, Ras Al Khaimah (RAK) Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease globally. In 2020, a new terminology, namely “metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease” (MAFLD), was proposed (1). Cardiometabolic criteria have been added in the updated definition to highlight the elevated cardiovascular risk in these patients. The revised definition better emphasizes the central role of metabolic dysfunction in the development and progression of this highly prevalent condition. From a morbidity standpoint, both definitions are associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and renal dysfunction. In a study of 6873 individuals with a 4.6-year follow-up, the associations of MAFLD and NAFLD with diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were similar (2). Epidemiological evidence indicates that MAFLD is not only associated with an increased risk of liver-related complications, but also increases the possibility of developing several extra-hepatic diseases, including new-onset type 2 diabetes (T2DM) as well as adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes (3). Metabolic disorders, including overweight/obesity, T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia are often associated with systemic organ dysfunction, thereby suggesting that similar morbidity could occur in MAFLD (Figure 1). The novel understanding underscores the bidirectional relationship between hepatic steatosis and the metabolic dysfunction continuum.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Relationships between MAFLD and metabolic disorders that increase cardiovascular risk.

The association between MAFLD and renal dysfunction is intriguing and has been highlighted in recent years. MAFLD has been proposed to be independently associated with an increased risk of CKD (4). Parvanova and colleagues investigated the prevalence of MAFLD in prediabetes, visceral obesity, and preserved kidney function, and explored whether MAFLD is associated with renal hyperfiltration, an early sign of kidney damage (5).

Renal hyperfiltration is generally defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) that is 2 standard deviations above the age- and sex-specific mean, i.e.: ≥98th percentile. They analyzed data from more than 6000 Spanish civil servants, aged 18-65 years, with fasting plasma glucose ≥ 100 and ≤ 125 mg/dL (prediabetes). Approximately 4000 patients (62.9%) had MAFLD, and 330 (4.9%) had renal hyperfiltration. MAFLD was more frequent in individuals with hyperfiltration than without (86.4% vs 61.7%, P < 0.001). More than half of the subjects with prediabetes, visceral obesity, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 ml/min presented with MAFLD that was associated with hyperfiltration.

Interestingly, the pathophysiologic basis of the association between MAFLD and altered renal function has still to be fully unraveled. A recent finding is that MAFLD is associated with systemic dysregulation (6). It is regarded by some as the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), with heightened inflammation, altered renal hemodynamics, elevated proinflammatory markers, and endothelial dysfunction all playing a part (7). In the setting of increased oxidative stress and a chronically abnormal adipokine profile, the low-grade, subclinical inflammation promotes hepatic lipid accumulation and atherogenic dyslipidemia (“lipotoxicity”). In this regard, the roles of two key adipocytokines in MAFLD are worth mentioning. Increased leptin secretion promotes progression of steatosis to steatohepatitis, with a concomitant reduction in adiponectin, which has anti-inflammatory anti-atherogenic properties (8). Increased visceral fat deposition also enhances release of tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (9). The aforementioned factors have been shown to contribute to an increased likelihood of kidney involvement in individuals with MAFLD (10).

MAFLD and glomerular hyperfiltration share common risk factors, including obesity, insulin resistance (IR), impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Abbate et al. found an increased association between MAFLD and dysglycemia (11). They reported that the prevalence of MAFLD averaged 19.3%, and progressively increased from 14.7% to 33.2% and 48.9% in subjects with normoglycemia, prediabetes and T2DM, respectively. Chen et al. aimed to clarify the association between MAFLD and incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) prospectively in a cohort of 337,783 UK Biobank participants over a median duration of 12.8 years (12). Participants with MAFLD were twice likely to develop ESRD, and the association of MAFLD with ESRD risk remained significant in both non-CKD and CKD participants. Since hepatic IR is a common accompaniment of MAFLD, it is not surprising that T2DM shows a significant epidemiologic overlap with the latter. Worldwide, between 18%-33% of individuals with NAFLD also have T2DM, while up to 66%-83% of those with fatty liver disease have varying degrees of IR (13, 14). Clinical improvements in MAFLD and T2DM can favorably impact CKD progression (15).

Studies have shown that the coexistence of MAFLD and CKD predicts the risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) better than MAFLD or CKD alone (16). In addition, the combination of abdominal obesity and MAFLD increases the prevalence of, and mortality from, CKD. In a retrospective cohort study of 9161 participants that analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys III (NHANES III) data from 1988 to 1994, the abdominally obese MAFLD group had the highest all-cause mortality as well as disease-specific mortality during the 30-year follow-up period (17). Abdominal obesity could therefore serve as a mediator in the association between MAFLD and CKD.

Ascertaining the relationship between CKD and the development of liver fibrosis in MAFLD is of obvious and significant clinical importance. In this respect, individuals with CKD exhibited a greater incidence of fibrosis compared to those without CKD (75.6% vs. 24.4%) (18). Liver fibrosis as assessed by transient elastography is independently associated with albuminuria in MAFLD subjects (19). It is noteworthy that liver steatosis was found to be a better predictor of CKD than fibrosis in MAFLD (20).

Having explored the association between MAFLD and CKD, we would like to recommend early and more aggressive measures to favorably impact the natural history of the “MAFLD-Renal Syndrome”. The main clinical interventions are listed in Table 1. Firstly, the primary importance of early identification of MAFLD, while still in the reversible stages, in a population with increasing rates of obesity and type 2 diabetes cannot be over-emphasized. This requires a high index of suspicion and involves screening asymptomatic high-risk patients for this condition using approved tools. The diagnosis of MAFLD or the presence of its associated metabolic risk factors should be promptly followed by evaluation for kidney dysfunction. Such an early screening strategy is justified based on the evidence showing an epidemiologic, and likely a pathophysiologic, association between the two conditions. It would be reasonable to employ sensitive measurements of early renal damage, such as microalbuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and emerging biomarkers such as nystatin C. Lifestyle interventions including dietary modifications, weight loss, and physical activity are beneficial for amelioration of the obesity-metabolic syndrome and form the therapeutic cornerstone of management (21). Pharmacologic interventions aimed at weight loss and MAFLD are likely to be helpful to the kidneys, although a detailed review is beyond the scope of this paper. There is preliminary evidence supporting the use of nutraceutical approaches and certain MiRNAs in mitigating the deleterious milieu and modifying gene expression in steatohepatitis (22, 23). The thyroid hormone receptor activator resmetirom is the only drug approved to reduce liver fat accumulation and treat noncirrhotic hepatitis and moderate-to-advanced hepatic fibrosis in MAFLD (24); however, its impact on the progression of associated renal dysfunction is unknown. It is evident that preventive aspects of early intervention are key to reducing the burden of renal disease in MAFLD. In this context emerging areas of research and therapeutics include the following: 1) the potential role of the renin-angiotensin system in the genesis and progression of renal dysfunction in MAFLD (25); 2) the role of immune mechanisms such as antigen-activated CD8+ T cells, and the impact of immune-modulating agents, in the pathogenesis of MAFLD-associated renal disease (26), and 3) the applicability of several promising renal biomarkers, such as kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP), in the detection and surveillance of renal involvement in fatty liver disease (27). Future efforts also need to be directed at investigating and targeting the unique hepatorenal pathways that operate in this evolving pathophysiologic relationship.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Recommended renoprotective measures in MAFLD.

Author contributions

SA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AR: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MR: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Gofton C, Upendran Y, Zheng MH, George J. MAFLD: How is it different from NAFLD? Clin Mol Hepatol. (2023) 29:S17–31. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0367

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Liang Y, Chen H, Liu Y, Hou X, Wei L, Bao Y, et al. Association of MAFLD with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease: A 4.6-year cohort study in China. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. (2022) 107:88–97. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab641

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Theofilis P, Vordoni A, Kalaitzidis RG. Interplay between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and chronic kidney disease: Epidemiology, pathophysiologic mechanisms, and treatment considerations. World J. Gastroenterol. (2022) 28:5691–706. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i39.5691

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Sun DQ, Jin Y, Wang TY, Zheng KI, Rios RS, Zhang HY, et al. MAFLD and risk of CKD. Metabolism. (2021) 115:154433. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154433

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Parvanova A, Abbate M, Yañez AM, Bennasar-Veny M, López-González ÁA, Ramírez-Manent JI, et al. MAFLD and glomerular hyperfiltration in subjects with prediabetes, visceral obesity and “preserved” kidney function: A cross-sectional study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. (2023) 201:110729. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110729

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Zhao J, Liu L, Cao YY, Gao X, Targher G, Byrne CD, et al. MAFLD as part of systemic metabolic dysregulation. Hepatol. Int. (2024) 18:834–47. doi: 10.1007/s12072-024-10660-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mikolasevic I, Milic S, Turk Wensveen T, Grgic I, Jakopcic I, Stimac D, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease - A multisystem disease? World J. Gastroenterol. (2016) 22:9488–505. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9488

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Fargion S, Porzio M, Fracanzani AL. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and vascular disease: state-of-the-art. World J. Gastroenterol. (2014) 20:13306–24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13306

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Marra F, Gastaldelli A, Svegliati Baroni G, Tell G, Tiribelli C. Molecular basis and mechanisms of progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Trends Mol. Med. (2008) 14:72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.12.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Musso G, Tabibian JH, Charlton M. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and NAFLD: time for awareness and screening. J. Hepatol. (2015) 62:983–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.044

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Abbate M, Parvanova A, López-González ÁA, Yañez AM, Bennasar-Veny M, Ramírez-Manent JI, et al. MAFLD and glomerular hyperfiltration in subjects with normoglycemia, prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional population study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. (2024) 40:e3810. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.v40.4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chen S, Pang J, Huang R, Xue H, Chen X. Association of MAFLD with end-stage kidney disease: a prospective study of 337,783 UK Biobank participants. Hepatol Int. (2023) 17:595–605. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10486-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, Nuremberg P, Horton JD, Cohen JC, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. (2004) 40:1387–95. doi: 10.1002/hep.20466

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. López-Velázquez JA, Silva-Vidal KV, Ponciano-Rodríguez G, Chávez-Tapia NC, Arrese M, Uribe M, et al. The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Americas. Ann. Hepatol. (2014) 13:166–78.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

15. Su W, Chen M, Xiao L, Du S, Xue L, Feng R, et al. Association of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and metabolic goal achievement with risk of chronic kidney disease. Front. Public Health. (2022) 10:1047794. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1047794

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Miyamori D, Tanaka M, Sato T, Endo K, Mori K, Mikami T, et al. Coexistence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and chronic kidney disease is a more potent risk factor for ischemic heart disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. (2023) 12:e030269. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030269

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Cen C, Fan Z, Ding X, Tu X, Liu Y. Associations between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, chronic kidney disease, and abdominal obesity: a national retrospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. (2024) 14:12645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63386-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Badawi R, Fahmy Abou Taira NS, Hasby SE, Elkhalawany W, Elrefaey W, Ahmed Khalf N, et al. The association of liver fibrosis and chronic kidney disease in patients with metabolic associated fatty liver disease: A cross-sectional study. Saudi Med. J. (2024) 45:1034–40. doi: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.10.20240393

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Ciardullo S, Ballabeni C, Trevisan R, Perseghin G. Liver fibrosis assessed by transient elastography is independently associated with albuminuria in the general United States population. Dig Liver Dis. (2021) 53:866–72. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.02.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Marc L, Mihaescu A, Lupusoru R, Grosu I, Gadalean F, Bob F, et al. Liver steatosis: better predictor of CKD in MAFLD than liver fibrosis as determined by transient elastography with Controlled Attenuation Parameter. Front. Med. (Lausanne). (2022) 8:788881. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.788881

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Al Hashmi K, Giglio RV, Pantea Stoian A, Patti AM, Al Waili K, Al Rasadi K, et al. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: current therapeutic strategies. Front. Nutr. (2024) 11:1355732. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1355732

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Rizzo M, Colletti A, Penson PE, Katsiki N, Mikhailidis DP, Toth PP, et al. Nutraceutical approaches to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): A position paper from the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP). Pharmacol. Res. (2023) 189:106679. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106679

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Mahmoudi A, Jalili A, Aghaee-Bakhtiari SH, Oskuee RK, Butler AE, Rizzo M, et al. Analysis of the therapeutic potential of miR-124 and miR-16 in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Diabetes Complications. (2024) 38:108722. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108722

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kokkorakis M, Boutari C, Hill MA, Kotsis V, Loomba R, Sanyal AJ, et al. Resmetirom, the first approved drug for the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: Trials, opportunities, and challenges. Metabolism. (2024) 154:155835. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2024.155835

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Alvarado-Ojeda ZA, Trejo-Moreno C, Ferat-Osorio E, Méndez-Martínez M, Fragoso G, Rosas-Salgado G. Role of angiotensin II in non-alcoholic steatosis development. Arch. Med. Res. (2024) 55:102986. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2024.102986

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Peiseler M, Schwabe R, Hampe J, Kubes P, Heikenwälder M, Tacke F. Immune mechanisms linking metabolic injury to inflammation and fibrosis in fatty liver disease - novel insights into cellular communication circuits. J. Hepatol. (2022) 77:1136–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.06.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Lousa I, Reis F, Beirão I, Alves R, Belo L, Santos-Silva A. New potential biomarkers for chronic kidney disease management-A review of the literature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. (2020) 22:43. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), renal dysfunction, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, obesity

Citation: Al Ashi S, Rizvi AA and Rizzo M (2025) Altered kidney function in fatty liver disease: confronting the “MAFLD-renal syndrome”. Front. Clin. Diabetes Healthc. 5:1539117. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1539117

Received: 03 December 2024; Accepted: 13 December 2024;
Published: 08 January 2025.

Edited by:

Hidetaka Hamasaki, Japan Medical Exercise Association, Japan

Reviewed by:

Kengo Moriyama, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Japan

Copyright © 2025 Al Ashi, Rizvi and Rizzo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ali A. Rizvi, YWFyaXp2aUBhb2wuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.