Skip to main content

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Clim.
Sec. Climate Risk Management
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fclim.2024.1453366

Beyond 2030: structures for achieving sustainable development

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
  • 2 Centre for Sustainable Development, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    With 2030 quickly approaching and hence the end of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) timeline, it is necessary to start the conversation as to what the post-2030 international development goals, that will take over from the SDGs, will look like. Building on the experiences of implementing the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and SDGs, there is the possibility of making the post-2030 goals the most efficient and successful to date. This perspective explores the lessons that have been learnt from the MDGs and SDGs, and together with a consideration of emerging global trends develops proposals for post-2030 goals and targets.In total seven goals are suggested: 1) Operate within planetary boundaries 2) Create growth within resource limits 3) Provide access to basic services for all 4) Eliminate poverty and hunger 5) Reduce inequality 6) Deliver good health and education for all 7) Build strong institutions and international partnerships. The goals are categorised as being: i) Environmental and Economic ii) Physical Assets iii) Social, and iv) Collaboration. System interdependencies and possible causal connections between the proposed post-2030 goals are also explored. A novel approach of five yearly assessments of the risks involved if the targets are not met, together with suggestions for corrective action is discussed, which will help inform governments and decision makers of the urgent actions needed.

    Keywords: Sustainable development goals, Planetary boundaries, Global catastrophic risk, International Development, United Nations (UN)

    Received: 04 Jul 2024; Accepted: 30 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cernev and Fenner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Tom Cernev, Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1SB, England, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.