ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Chem.
Sec. Analytical Chemistry
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1578126
This article is part of the Research TopicRecent Advances in Pharmaceutical Analysis: Applications and New Challenges for the Quality of MedicinesView all 12 articles
Discrimination of poisonous and medicinal plants with similar appearance (Asarum heterotropoides vs Cynanchum paniculatum) via a fusion method of E-nose, E-tongue, LC-HR-Q-TOF-MS/MS, and electrochemical fingerprint spectra
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Da Lian, China
- 2Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The similarity in appearance of poisonous and medicinal plants, such as Asarum heterotropoides (AH) and Cynanchum paniculatum (CP), poses safety risks due to frequent confusion. Since AH contains toxic ingredients, the traditional methods of olfactory and gustatory identification cannot be used to distinguish AH from CP. To differentiate them systematically, we propose a novel strategy based on dual electronic sensors (DES) and dual fingerprint spectra (DFS). In this strategy, DES includes two intelligent sensors namely the E-nose and E-tongue, which differentiate AH and CP based on odor and taste, respectively. DFS comprises chemical fingerprint spectra obtained through LC-HR-Q- TOF-MS/MS and electrochemical fingerprint spectra derived from the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction, differentiating AH and CP by their specific and overall compositions, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the E-nose, E-tongue, LC-HR-Q-TOF-MS/MS, and the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction have been combined to identify AH and CP. With the E-nose, we identified 25 major odor components in AH and 12 odor components in CP in a single run of 140 seconds. Using the E-tongue, bitterness and astringency were identified as their primary taste differences. Furthermore, 91 compounds in AH and 90 compounds in CP were identified through LC-HR-Q-TOF-MS/MS. Both AH and CP shared nitrogenous compounds, volatile oils, organic acids, and lignans. However, AH uniquely contained coumarins and flavonoids, while CP contained steroidal compounds and saccharides. Notably, AH also possessed distinct toxic components, specifically aristolactam I, aristolochic acid D, and safrole. Based on the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction, we obtained the electrochemical fingerprint spectra of AH and CP, thereby facilitating further distinction between these two herbs. Through the combination of electrochemical fingerprint spectra with principal component analysis (PCA) or orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), the accuracy of this method reached 100%. Through the fusion strategy, the odors, tastes, components, and electrochemical properties of AH and CP have been systematically analyzed.
Keywords: medicinal plants, electronic nose, ELECTRONIC TONGUE, Mass Spectrometry, Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction
Received: 17 Feb 2025; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Chen, Zhang, Wang, Sun, Ding, Zhang, Xie, Kang and Song. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yue-Hua Chen, School of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Da Lian, China
Hui-Peng Song, School of Pharmacy, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Da Lian, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.