Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Chem.
Sec. Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1487887

Anti-proliferative Effects of a Polyherbal Formulation on HL-60, HCT-116, and HeLa Cell Lines: A Docking Simulation and Response Surface Design-Aided Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 African Centre of Excellence in Public Health and Toxicological Research (ACE-PUTOR), University of Port-Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • 2 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Rivers, Nigeria
  • 3 College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia
  • 4 Health and Basic Sciences Research Center, Majmaah University, Majmaah, 11952, Saudi Arabia., Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia
  • 5 Department of Immunology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA., New York, United States
  • 6 Department of Oncological Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • 7 Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois, United States
  • 8 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Nigeria,, Enugu Campus, Nigeria
  • 9 University Institute of Diet and Nutrition, University of Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Cancer is a complex global health challenge that requires novel and holistic approaches to treatment and prevention. Polyherbal medicines, composed of multiple plants with historical use in traditional medicine, have gained popularity due to their safety, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. However, selecting the right plants and determining optimal combinations for enhanced biological effects remains challenging. To address this, a molecular docking study was conducted, targeting proteins implicated in cancer pathogenesis. The study identified bioactive compounds with strong binding energies, guiding the selection of polyherbal formulations for further experimentation. Using response surface methodology, various combinations of plant extracts were screened for their antioxidant properties and phytochemical content. Among the formulations tested, PHEE (Polyherbal Ethanolic Extract), comprising 70% soursop leaf, 5% jackfruit leaf, 5% orange peel, 15% citrus juice, and 5% apple fruit ethanolic extracts, exhibited the most potent biological activities, followed by SLEE (Soursop Leaf Ethanolic Extract), a 100% soursop leaf ethanolic extract. Design Expert Software predicted soursop leaf extract as a key contributor to desirable outcomes, attributed to its rich phytochemical composition. Cell-based assays revealed varying cytotoxic effects of the extracts on leukemia cells, with PHEE showing the highest potency (IC50 = 2.50 µg/mL), followed closely by SLEE (IC50 = 2.90 µg/mL). These effects are potentially due to the abundant acetogenins and flavonoids present in the extracts. However, caution is warranted regarding their cytotoxicity to normal cells. Apoptotic studies confirmed the ability of both PHEE and SLEE to induce programmed cell death, further supporting their potential as anticancer agents. This research underscores the importance of strategic plant combinations in polyherbal formulations and highlights PHEE as a promising candidate for further investigation in cancer treatment.

    Keywords: Polyherbal formulation, Cancer drug discovery, Anti-cancer plants, cell lines, Cytotoxicity

    Received: 28 Aug 2024; Accepted: 15 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Egbuna, Patrick-iwuanyanwu, Onyeike, Khan, AlDosari, Jahan, Adedokun, Imodoye, Bello, Uche and Noreen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Eugene N. Onyeike, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Rivers, Nigeria
    Johra Khan, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia
    Sahar AlDosari, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Majmaah, Saudi Arabia
    Sikiru O. Imodoye, Department of Oncological Sciences, School of Medicine, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 84112-5775, Utah, United States
    Chukwuemelie Z. Uche, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Nigeria,, Enugu Campus, Nigeria

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.