Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Chem.
Sec. Green and Sustainable Chemistry
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1467810

Harnessing the potential of deep eutectic solvents in biocatalysis: design strategies using CO2 to formate reduction as a case study

Provisionally accepted
Marijan Logarušić Marijan Logarušić 1Karla Šubar Karla Šubar 1Maja Nikolić Maja Nikolić 1Ana Tušek Ana Tušek 1Anja Damjanović Anja Damjanović 1Mia Radović Mia Radović 1Ivana Radojčić Redovniković Ivana Radojčić Redovniković 1Polona Žnidaršič-Plazl Polona Žnidaršič-Plazl 1Wolfgang Kroutil Wolfgang Kroutil 2Marina Cvjetko Bubalo Marina Cvjetko Bubalo 1*
  • 1 University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 2 University of Graz, Graz, Styria, Austria

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have emerged as green solvents with versatile applications, demonstrating significant potential in biocatalysis. They often increase the solubility of poorly watersoluble substrates, serve as smart co-substrates, modulate enzyme stereoselectivity, and potentially improve enzyme activity and stability. Despite these advantages, screening for an optimal DES and determining the appropriate water content for a given biocatalytic reaction remains a complex and time-consuming process, posing a significant challenge. This paper discusses the rational design of DES tailored to a given biocatalytic system through a combination of experimental screening and computational tools, guided by performance targets defined by solvent properties and process constraints. The efficacy of this approach is demonstrated by the reduction of CO2 to formate catalyzed by NADH-dependent formate dehydrogenase (FDH). By systematically analyzing FDH activity and stability, NADH stability (both long-term and short-term stability after solvent saturation with CO2), and CO2 solubility in initially selected glycerol-based DESs, we were able to skillfully guide the DES screening process. Considering trade-offs between experimentally determined performance metrics of DESs, 20% solution of choline chloride:glycerol in phosphate buffer (ChCl:Gly80%B) was identified as the most promising solvent system for a given reaction. Using ChCl:Gly as a co-solvent resulted in an almost 15-fold increase in FDH half-life compared to the reference buffer and stabilized the coenzyme after the addition of CO2. Moreover, the 20% addition of ChCl:Gly to the buffer improved the volumetric productivity of FDH-catalyzed CO2 reduction in a batch system compared to the reference buffer. The exceptional stability of the enzyme in this cosolvent system shows great potential for application in continuous operation, which can significantly improve process productivity. Additionally, based on easily measurable physicochemical solvent properties and molecular descriptors derived from COSMO-RS, QSAR models were developed, which successfully predicted enzyme activity and stability, as well as coenzyme stability in selected solvent systems with DESs.

    Keywords: deep eutectic solvents, rational design, Biocatalysis, mathematical modelling, QSAR, formate dehydrogenase, NADH, CO2 conversion

    Received: 20 Jul 2024; Accepted: 10 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Logarušić, Šubar, Nikolić, Tušek, Damjanović, Radović, Radojčić Redovniković, Žnidaršič-Plazl, Kroutil and Cvjetko Bubalo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Marina Cvjetko Bubalo, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.