Robust α-Fe2O3@TiO2 Core–Shell Structures With Tunable Buffer Chambers for High-Performance Lithium Storage

α-Fe₂O₃ has high potential energy storage capacity and can serve as a green and low-cost anode material for lithium-ion batteries. However, α-Fe₂O₃ suffers large volume expansion and pulverization. Based on DFT calculations, TiO₂ can effectively maintain the integrity of the crystal structure during the discharge/charge process. Well-defined cubic α-Fe₂O₃ is coated with a TiO₂ layer using the hydrothermal method with the assistance of oxalic acid surface treatment, and then α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ with tunable buffer chambers is obtained by altering the hydrochloric acid etching time. With the joint efforts of the buffer chamber and the robust structure of the TiO₂ layer, α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ alleviates the expansion of α-Fe₂O₃ during the discharge/charge process. The optimized sample (FT-1h) achieves good cycling performance. The reversible specific capacity remains at 893.7 mA h g^-1, and the Coulombic efficiency still reaches up to 98.47% after 150 cycles at a current density of 100 mA g⁻¹. Furthermore, the reversible specific capacity can return to 555.5 mA h g⁻¹ at 100 mA g⁻¹ after cycling at a high current density. Hence, the buffer chamber and the robust TiO₂ layer can effectively improve the cycling stability and rate performance of α-Fe₂O₃.

Introduction

With the rapid development of portable electronic devices and electric vehicles, the demand for batteries with higher energy densities, greater safety, and longer cycling lifetimes has become extremely urgent (Duffner et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been widely used over the past few years and have been increasingly studied (Kim et al., 2019; Guo and Li, 2021). The ideal anode material should have a much higher cycle life and a moderate potential plateau (Jin et al., 2021). Transition metal oxides (MO_x, where M represents Fe, Co, Mn, Ni, etc.) are usually used as anode materials in lithium-ion batteries due to their high theoretical specific capacity (Li et al., 2021a; Li Q. et al., 2021). α-Fe₂O₃ has become a promising anode material for Li-ion batteries due to its high theoretical capacity (1,007 mAh g⁻¹) and low cost (Kong et al., 2016). However, the poor conductivity and violent volume expansion of α-Fe₂O₃ during the discharge/charge progress result in its poor rate and cycling performance as an anode material in Li-ion batteries. To overcome these problems, many researchers have expended considerable efforts to test potential solutions, such as various morphologies [porous quasi-clusters (Li Z. et al., 2019), porous nanotubes (Wang Z. et al., 2018), and one-dimensional mesoporous nanowires (Li et al., 2020)] and conductive carbon material coatings [graphene oxide (Zhang et al., 2019), carbon cloth (Narsimulu et al., 2019), N-doped carbon hybrids (Li et al., 2018), and spherical graphite (Yan et al., 2020)]. Although the rate and cycling performance of α-Fe₂O₃ have been improved, they have still not reached satisfactory levels.

TiO₂ is an essential member of the family of transition metal oxides, which are widely used in photocatalysis (Xu et al., 2017; Wang L. et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019a; Wang et al., 2019b), solar cells (Wu et al., 2017), and lithium-ion batteries (Huo et al., 2021). As an anode of lithium-ion batteries, TiO₂ has good cycling stability and a low volume expansion ratio (less than 4%) (Liang et al., 2020). However, the reversible capacity of TiO₂ as an anode material in lithium-ion batteries is low, and its theoretical capacity is only 335 mA h g⁻¹ (Liang et al., 2020). To improve the specific capacity of TiO₂, a large number of scientific researchers investigated different structures of TiO₂, such as porous (Nong et al., 2020), hollow nanosphere (Fan et al., 2021), branch-like (Gao et al., 2019), heterogeneous mesoporous hollow nanocage-in-nanocage, and sandwich structures (Yuan et al., 2019). Additionally, many attempts to combine carbon with TiO₂ have been made (Ni et al., 2019; Yuan et al., 2021). However, the specific capacity of TiO₂ has still not been significantly improved.

The combination of α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂ may form a new kind of Li-ion battery anode material. α-Fe₂O₃ grains grafted onto TiO₂/carbon nanofibers (CNFs) have been successfully fabricated by electrospinning and vapor–solid reaction (VSR), with the resulting material demonstrating greatly enhanced diffusion kinetics and structural stability for use in lithium-ion batteries (Yang et al., 2019). Robust Fe₂O₃ nanoplates have been coated with small TiO₂ nanoplates, forming a slice-on-slice structure with large voids, with the resulting material exhibiting good Li storage properties (Zhao et al., 2018). A bio-inspired nanotubular TiO₂/Fe₂O₃ composite has been fabricated by using a natural cellulose substance (laboratory filter paper) as the structural scaffold, showing good cycling stability and excellent rate capability (Li S. et al., 2019). Notably, a core–shell structure is an effective means to improve cycling performance (Li et al., 2021). Thus, α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ composed of a hollow inner core and an outer shell with massive mesopores has been prepared, thus exhibiting outstanding electrochemical properties (Fu et al., 2015).

Different from the aforementioned materials, a tunable buffer chamber is fabricated in this study. Cubic α-Fe₂O₃ is used as the core, and a TiO₂ layer is coated on this core using the hydrothermal method. With an increasing etching time, α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ becomes more hollowed out. Thus, a buffer chamber is formed between α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂. With the help of this structure, the volume expansion of α-Fe₂O₃ during the discharge/charge process is alleviated when applied as the anode material in lithium-ion batteries, which is also proven by theoretical calculations.

Theoretical and Experimental Method

Calculation Method

With the density functional theory (DFT) (Hohenberg, 1964; Kohn and Sham, 1965), the process of Li-ion de/insertion in α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂ is studied. Ultrasoft pseudopotentials were used to calculate the interaction of the ionic core and valence electrons for Fe 3d⁶4s², Ti 3s²3p⁶3d²4s², Li 1s²2s¹, and O 2s²p⁴. The exchange and correlation terms were described with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) (Perdew et al., 1996; Perdew et al., 1998). Monkhorst–Pack k-point meshes were conducted to address the Brillouin-zone integrations (Monkhorst and Pack, 1976). Convergence criteria were set as follows: the maximum force, the maximum stress, and the maximum displacement on the atom were below 0.1 eV nm⁻¹, 0.02 GPa, and 5.0 × 10^–5 nm, respectively.

A periodic structure was adopted in the calculation. The unit cells of α-Fe₂O₃ and anatase TiO₂ (space group of R-3C and 141/AMD) contained 12 iron atoms, 18 oxygen atoms, four titanium atoms, and eight oxygen atoms (Supplementary Figure S1). Moreover, 380 eV was set as the cutoff energy for both. The number of k-points was set as 6 × 6×2 and 7 × 7×3. The calculated lattices agreed well with the theoretical and experimental data (Finger and Hazen, 1980; Arlt et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2017; Jenness et al., 2018) (Supplementary Table S1).

Synthesis of α-Fe₂O₃

With vigorous stirring in an oil bath at 75°C, 50 ml of 2.0 mol/L FeCl₃·6H₂O solution was added to a round-bottom flask containing 50 ml of 5.4 mol/L NaOH. After stirring for 5 min, a red-brown Fe(OH)₃ colloid formed in the flask, which was then transferred to a high-temperature and high-pressure PTFE reactor. The hydrothermal reaction was conducted at 100°C for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature, the obtained red precipitate was centrifuged, successively rinsed with deionized water and ethanol three times, and then dried overnight to obtain α-Fe₂O₃.

The synthesized α-Fe₂O₃ was treated with oxalic acid, for which 8 ml of deionized water was added to a beaker containing 0.2 g of α-Fe₂O₃, and then 0.1 g of oxalic acid was added. After shaking at room temperature for 6 h, the red precipitate was obtained by centrifugation and then successively rinsed with deionized water and ethanol three times. After drying overnight, oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ was obtained.

Synthesis of Core–Shell α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂

The core–shell α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ synthesis process is illustrated in Figure 1. In a beaker containing 33 ml of absolute ethanol, 0.1 g of oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ was added, and then, 0.1 ml of concentrated ammonia water was added with stirring and stirred for 5 min. Next, 0.25 ml of tetrabutyl titanate (TBOT) was added with vigorous stirring, and ultrasonication was performed for 40 min. The solution in the beaker was transferred to the PTFE reactor. After hydrothermal reaction at 45°C for 24 h, the solution was cooled to room temperature and then centrifuged. The red precipitate was rinsed with deionized water and ethanol three times and then dried overnight. In an air environment, the product was calcined at 450°C for 2 h to obtain α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂, and then, 0.1 g α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ was added to 25 ml of 10 mol/L HCl and oscillated for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 12 h. Then, they were successively rinsed with deionized water and ethanol three times and dried overnight to obtain α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ at different etching degrees. The samples were denoted as FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, FT-4h, and FT-12h (pure TiO₂).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. Schematic showing the synthesis of core–shell α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂.

Material Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8, Germany) was used to characterize the synthesized powder samples. The morphology of each sample was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEOL, JSM-2100, Japan). The component and valence analysis of the synthesized samples were carried out by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250, an Al K excitation source, United States). Additionally, HRTEM (TF20, JOEL, 2100F, Japan) was used to map the elemental distribution of the samples. The specific surface area and pore size analyzer (BET, ASiQ Mini QUANTACHROME) was used to determine the porosity of the samples.

Electrochemical Characterization

The prepared samples were mixed with acetylene black and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) at a weight ratio of 7:2:1 in N-methyl-2 pyrrolidone (NMP). The obtained slurry was uniformly smeared on a 9-μm-thick copper foil and dried in a vacuum oven at 80°C for 10 h, and then a 12-mm-diameter negative plate was cut, and 1 M LiPF₆, in a mixture of 1:1:1 vol.% ethylene carbonate (EC), diethyl carbonate (DEC), and dimethyl carbonate (DC) was used as the electrolyte (ternary electrolyte LBC305-1, Shenzhen Kejinzida Technology Co., Ltd.). With a 15.6-mm × 0.45-mm lithium sheet as the positive electrode and a Celgard 2325 diaphragm as the battery separator, the prepared negative electrode was assembled into a CR2025 battery in a glove box (Super, Germany Mikrouna) that was filled with argon gas (water concentration <0.1 ppm and oxygen concentration <0.1 ppm). The cycling and rate performance were tested with a Blue Power instrument (Wuhan Blue Electronics Co., Ltd.). An electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Co., Ltd.) was used to obtain cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves, and a different electrochemical workstation (ZAHNER Company, Germany) was used to conduct electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).

Results and Discussion

Calculation Analysis

According to the symmetry of α-Fe₂O₃ and anatase TiO₂, there are one and two symmetrical positions for Li ions to be inserted into α-Fe₂O₃ (6b) and TiO₂ (16 h, 8 days), respectively (Figure 2). One unit cell of α-Fe₂O₃ can accommodate six Li ions, but one unit cell of TiO₂ can only accommodate four Li ions. Thus, the reaction equation of Li ions and Fe₂O₃ is as follows:

${\text{Fe}}_2{\text{O}}_3+{\text{Li}}^{+}+{\text{e}}^{-}\to \text{Li}\left({\text{Fe}}_2{\text{O}}_3\right).(1)$

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Li inserted in the symmetrical sites of α-Fe₂O₃ (6b) and TiO₂ (16 h, 8 days) before the geometry optimization (A,B) and after the geometry optimization (B,D).

Eq (1) is consistent with Yang et al. (2019). The reaction process of Li ions and TiO₂ is given in Eq. 2:

${\text{TiO}}_2+{\text{Li}}^{+}+{\text{e}}^{-}\leftrightarrow {\text{LiTiO}}_2.(2)$

From Eq. 2, the theoretical capacity of TiO₂ can be calculated (335 mA h g⁻¹), which is consistent with Liang et al. (2020). After six Li ions were inserted into the α-Fe₂O₃ unit cell, the volume expanded by 9.64%. The volume of TiO₂ expanded by 1.15% after four Li ions were inserted. Moreover, the one, two, three, four, and five and one, two, and three Li ions inserted in the cells at the different sites of α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂ were also calculated (Supplementary Table S2). With an increasing number of Li ions inserted in the α-Fe₂O₃ cell, the volume continued to expand. However, it was amazing to find that the expansion rate of TiO₂ always remained below 2.2%. With the same number of Li ions inserted in the cell, the volume expansion of α-Fe₂O₃ was larger than that of TiO₂. There are two reasons for this result: one is that the interstitial vacancy (8 days and 16 h) of TiO₂ is larger than that of α-Fe₂O₃ (6b) and the other is that with Li ions insertion, the angle of Ti-O-Ti (Figures 2C,D) changes from 155.148° to 179.022°, which acts as a buffer. Hence, TiO₂ can effectively maintain its cell structure. Furthermore, it is believed that with an increasing number of Li ions inserted in α-Fe₂O₃ and the combination of O ions, the cell will continue to expand. This mechanism is the reason to coat α-Fe₂O₃ with TiO₂. Moreover, it is not found that the bonds of Ti-O and Fe-O are broken, which can be verified from Figure 2, the population analysis (Supplementary Table S3), and the density of states (DOS) (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. Density of states of TiO₂ (A) and α-Fe₂O₃ (B) with and without Li inserted at the symmetrical sites. The green dashed line represents a Fermi energy of 0.

The electronic population is usually used to assess the covalent or ionic nature of a bond. A high value of the bond population expresses a strong covalent bond (Aouadi, 2006). Both α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂ have two types of bonds, which are marked I and II in Supplementary Figure S1. From Supplementary Table S3, it can be found that the electronic populations of Fe-O I were little larger than those of Fe-O II. Meanwhile, the bond length of Fe-O I was shorter than that of Fe-O II. Nevertheless, the electronic population of Ti-O I was larger than that of Ti-O II, which means Ti-O I had stronger covalent bonds. When Li ions were inserted in α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂, the electronic population and bond length increased. Bond length increase can be attributed to volume expansion. Among them, the electronic population of Ti-O I increased the most, which means Ti-O I was enhanced. Instead of breaking, Ti-O I was strengthened.

The DOS of α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂ express two main regions near the Fermi level (Figure 3). The more important part is the first region, which is predominantly formed by non-metal O 2p states and Ti 3d (Fe 3d) states located between −10 and 0 eV. This part forms a strong p-d covalent bonding. With the Ti (Fe) and O atoms getting squeezed, it is found that the DOS below the Fermi level move to the low-energy part (the DOS of TiO₂+4 Li and Fe₂O₃+6 Li), which shows that Ti-O and Fe-O are enhanced. Furthermore, the TiO₂+4 Li DOS move more than the Fe₂O₃+6 Li DOS. This result indicates that Ti-O is more enhanced, which agrees well with the electronic population analysis.

Morphological and Structural Characterization

The SEM images of α-Fe₂O₃ without coating TiO₂ are shown in Figures 4A,B. α-Fe₂O₃ is successfully synthesized during the experiment. The XRD result is consistent with the diffraction peak of α-Fe₂O₃ (Haematite, syn) in PDF#33-0664 (Supplementary Figure S2). α-Fe₂O₃ has a cubic morphology with relatively smooth surfaces and a size of approximately 400–500 nm. In order to compare the effect of oxalic acid-treated and untreated α-Fe₂O₃ coating with TiO₂, untreated α-Fe₂O₃ is used for TiO₂ layer cladding. According to Figures 4C,D, when untreated α-Fe₂O₃ is coated with TiO₂, it is more prone to heterogeneous nucleation, and agglomeration is easy to occur. After cladding, the homogeneous Fe₂O₃ particles become inhomogeneous α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ particles.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. SEM images of α-Fe₂O₃ (A) and (B) and unprocessed α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ (C) and (D).

Figure 5 shows the samples of oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ and etched for different periods of time. Clearly, with an increasing etching time, α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ gradually changes from a core–shell structure to a completely hollowed out TiO₂ structure. The average core–shell sizes of different samples are listed in Supplementary Table S4. With hydrochloric acid etching, the thickness of shell changes a little, reducing from 58 to 45 nm, and maintains at 53 nm during the etching time of 1–4 h, while the core size changes greatly. The vertical diagonal (diagonal 1) changes from 560 to 100 nm. The horizontal diagonal (diagonal 2) changes from 568 to 419 nm. Thus, hydrochloric acid etching mainly aims to Fe₂O₃.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. SEM images of oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ and etched for different periods of time [FT-0.5h (A,B), FT-2h (D,E), FT-4h (G,H), and FT-12h (J,K) (pure TiO₂)]. TEM images of oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ and etched for different periods of time [FT-0.5h (C), FT-2h (F), FT-4h and (I), FT-12h (L) (pure TiO₂)].

As shown in Figure 6, the sample etched for 1 h (FT-1h) possesses a well-defined core–shell structure with a buffer chamber between the α-Fe₂O₃ core and the TiO₂ shell. From Figure 6A, it can be clearly observed that TiO₂ is successfully coated on α-Fe₂O₃. Furthermore, the TiO₂ coating layers are very uniform with few ruptures (Figure 6B). In addition, Figure 6C shows that there is a chamber between the α-Fe₂O₃ core and the TiO₂ shell whose thickness is about 80 nm. According to the EDS mapping of a single α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ core–shell structure (Figure 6D), Fe, Ti, and O are evenly distributed. The red section in Figure 6E shows that the TiO₂ layer covers the surface of α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂, and the yellow part in Figure 6F represents the α-Fe₂O₃ core structure. The green section illustrated in Figure 6G refers to O that is jointly contained by α-Fe₂O₃ and the TiO₂ covering layer in a single α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ core–shell structure. The composition of composite is further demonstrated by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), shown in Figure 6H. From the illustration, it shows that the compound is mainly composed of Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂, and Fe₂O₃ is the main part. Figure 7 displays the HRTEM image of FT-1h α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂. The stripes and grids on dark and light are different, which demonstrated that they were assembled by small crystals with measured lattice d-spacings of 0.35 and 0.37 nm, corresponding to the (101) plane of anatase TiO₂ and the (012) plane of Fe₂O₃, respectively. So, it can be proven that TiO₂ is uniformly dispersed on the surface of Fe₂O₃.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. SEM (A,B) and TEM-EDS of a single FT-1h α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ core–shell structure (C–H).

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7. HRTEM image of FT-1h α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂.

The chemical composition and crystal phase of the samples were investigated by XRD analysis. Figure 8 shows that the diffraction peak 2θ = 25.28°, 37.8°, 48.05°, 55.06°, and 62.69° corresponds to the (101), (004), (200), (211), and (204) planes of TiO₂, which is consistent with PDF#21-1272 (the diffraction peak of anatase). Samples FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, and FT-4h present the characteristic peaks of Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂, which expressed that TiO₂ coating is successfully combined with α-Fe₂O₃. Furthermore, it can be observed that the intensity of the characteristic peak at 24.1° of α-Fe₂O₃ decreases, and the characteristic peak at 25.3° of TiO₂ increases with an increasing etching time. In addition, no additional peaks were observed, suggesting high purity of the samples, which shows good agreement with the results of XPS spectra (Figure 9).

FIGURE 8

FIGURE 8. XRD patterns of pure Fe₂O₃, FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, FT-4h, and FT-12h (pure TiO₂).

FIGURE 9

FIGURE 9. XPS spectra of oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ and etched for different periods of time [FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, FT-4h, and FT-12h (pure TiO₂)]: (A) survey, (B) Fe2p, (C) Ti2p, and (D) O1s.

The XPS characterization was conducted to examine the chemical composition of samples (FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, FT-4h, and FT-12h (pure TiO₂)). The complete survey spectrum (Figure 9A) of α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ samples (FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, and FT-4h) reveal the existence of Ti, Fe, and O elements. For the C 1s XPS spectrum, the peak at 285.00 eV is attributed to adventitious carbon (Zhong et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019). The high-resolution XPS spectrum of Fe 2p was composed of two distinct peaks at 710.90 and 724.40 eV (Figure 9B), which correspond to Fe 2p^2/3 and 2p^1/2 with satellite lines. The spectrum is consistent with the characteristic of Fe³⁺ α-Fe₂O₃ (Zhong et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019). In the spectrum of Ti 2p (Figure 9C), the Ti 2p^3/2 and Ti 2p^1/2 peaks were located at binding energies of 458.70 and 464.65 eV, respectively, which is in agreement with the value of Ti⁴⁺ in the TiO₂ lattice (Zhong et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2018). The spectrum of the O1s core level is shown in Figure 9D, where binding energy peaks at 531.80 eV originate from bonded hydroxyl groups (Yang et al., 2019). For the broad peak centered at 530.00 eV, it is attributed to metal-bonding in both oxides (Zhao et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2019).

The texture characteristic of α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ was further confirmed by N₂ adsorption/desorption isotherm, as shown in Figure 10. It can be observed from Figure 10A that the specific surface area of pure α-Fe₂O₃ was very small, only 2.07 m³ g⁻¹. After coating with TiO₂, the specific surface area increased to approximately 30 m³ g⁻¹, and that is because pure α-Fe₂O₃ is smoother and denser than TiO₂, which can be seen from Figure 4. The surface bulge of TiO₂ was more obvious than that of pure α-Fe₂O₃. After etching for 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 12 h (pure TiO₂), more pores formed. The specific surface area increased to 32.1, 34.39, 36.96, 43.845, and 131.91 m³ g⁻¹. The isotherms were identified as IUPAC type IV, which is characteristic of mesoporous materials. The pore size distribution obtained from the isotherm indicates a number of pores 4–8 nm in the samples (Figure 10B). With increasing etching time, the pore volume increases. A structure with abundant mesopores is likely to buffer the volume expansion and allow the penetration of electrolyte for complete contact with the active material, thus playing an important role in improving the electrochemical properties of α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂.

FIGURE 10

FIGURE 10. BET figures (A) and pore size distribution (B) of oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ and etched for different periods of time [pure α-Fe₂O₃, FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, FT-4h, and FT-12h (pure TiO₂)].

Cyclic Voltammetry and Galvanostatic Cycling

Electrochemical performances of α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ (FT-1h) were investigated as anode materials for LIBs to demonstrate the effectiveness in improving lithium storage. Figure 11A shows the first four CV curves of the FT-1h sample between 0.01 and 3 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV⁻¹. It can be observed that the sample has a reduction peak and an oxidation peak at a potential of 1.73/2.13 V, which may be attributed to the de/insertion of lithium ions from TiO₂, as shown in Eq. 2. There are two oxidation peaks at potentials of 0.92 and 1.12 V, which correspond to the lithium reaction of Fe₂O₃, respectively, as shown in Eq. 3 (Fu et al., 2015).

${\text{Fe}}_2{\text{O}}_3+6{\text{Li}}^{+}6{\text{e}}^{-}\to 2{\text{Fe}}^0+3{\text{Li}}_2\text{O}\text{.}(3)$

FIGURE 11

FIGURE 11. Electrochemical performance test diagram of different samples: (A) Cyclic voltammetry curve of the FT-1h sample in the voltage range of 0.01–3 V and a sweep rate of 0.1 mV s⁻¹. (B) Charge–discharge test diagram of the FT-1h sample at a current density of 100 mA g⁻¹. (C) Rate performance of oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ and etched for different periods of time [FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, FT-4h, and FT-12h (pure TiO₂)], and the charge–discharge tests at a current density of 100 mA g⁻¹ for each cell after the rate performance test. (D) EIS resistance test drawings of pure α-Fe₂O₃, pure TiO₂, and FT-1h.

In addition, the oxidation peak between 1.5 and 2.0 V may correspond to Fe⁰ being reoxidized to Fe₂O₃, as shown in Eq. 4 (Fu et al., 2015).

${\text{Fe}}_2{\text{O}}_3+6\text{Li}\leftrightarrow 2{\text{Fe}}^0+3{\text{Li}}_2\text{O}\text{.}(4)$

After the second charge–discharge cycle, the peak position slightly shifts, and the peak strength slightly weakens, which may be attributed to the polarization of the anode material and the formation of an SEI film during the charge–discharge process (Fu et al., 2015). It can be clearly observed that the curves of the fourth charge–discharge cycle and the third charge–discharge cycle coincide well, indicating that the FT-1h sample has good cycling stability.

Charge and discharge curves of the sample FT-1h with a voltage of 0.01–3 V are shown in Figure 11B. According to the previous analysis, a wide slope from 1.75 to 0.8 V is attributed to the Li⁺ intercalation into the crystal structure of α-Fe₂O₃ and the phase transformation from hexagonal to cubic Li₂Fe₂O₃ (Qin et al., 2018). Last, an obvious plateau at 0.8 V is ascribed to the reduction from Fe²⁺ into Fe⁰, and the formation of amorphous Li₂O and an SEI layer (Zhu et al., 2020). After the first charge and discharge cycle, the discharge/charge specific capacities of the FT-1h sample are 1,609.3 mA h g⁻¹ and 1,021.6 mA h g⁻¹, respectively. In the second process, a plateau at 1.0 V is observed, which agrees well with Eq. 3. Furthermore, the discharge specific capacity is reduced to 1,228.6 mA h g⁻¹, and the Coulombic efficiency is 99.1%. The fifth circle is similar to the second, except the length of the plateau, which is shorter than the one in the first circle, and this is due to the irreversible capacity loss derived from the formation amorphous Li₂O (Yang et al., 2019). The discharge specific capacity is 999.4 mA h g⁻¹ after the fifth cycle. The 55th, 100th, and 150th curves express the similar circle curves, whose plateau is at 0.9 V, which is consistent with Eq. 3. After 150 charge–discharge cycles at a current density of 100 mA g⁻¹, the reversible capacity remains at 893.7 mA h g⁻¹, and the Coulombic efficiency is 98.4%.

Rate measurements of pure α-Fe₂O₃, oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ and etched for different periods of time (FT-0.5h, FT-1h, FT-2h, FT-4h, and FT-12h (pure TiO₂), and the charge–discharge tests at a current density of 100 mA g⁻¹ for each cell after the rate performance test are shown in Figure 11C. The reversible capacities of FT-1h at current densities of 100 mA g⁻¹, 200 mA g⁻¹, 500 mA g⁻¹, 1 A g⁻¹, and 2 A g⁻¹ reach 1,489.3, 586.8, 438.7, 332.7, and 224.5 mA h g⁻¹, respectively. When the current density is returned to 100 mA g⁻¹, the reversible capacity is still maintained at 555.5 mA h g⁻¹. After 100 charge–discharge cycles at a current density of 100 mA g⁻¹, the reversible capacity remains at 682.0 mA h g⁻¹, and the Coulombic efficiency is 99.7%. During the long cycle, the Coulombic efficiency is maintained above 98%. The capacity decreases at the beginning and continuously increases during the latter long term cycle test. It is supposed to be the grain boundaries of iron metal and Li₂O formed in the electrochemical process (Eq. 4), which contributes to the extra energy storage of the composite (Li S. et al., 2019). This phenomenon is common for most MO_x (M = Fe, Co, and Ni) attributed to the activation of the materials (Kaprans et al., 2018). Comparing the different etching times, it can be found that the battery performances of the etched samples are higher than that of pure α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂, indicating that the different degrees of buffer chambers can relieve, to a certain extent, the volume expansion of α-Fe₂O₃ during the discharge/charge process. Furthermore, the SEM images of pure Fe₂O₃ and FT-1h after 100 charge–discharge cycles are shown in Supplementary Figure S3. Fe₂O₃ morphology gets damaged severely if TiO₂ is not protected. On the contrary, sample FT-1h maintained the original morphology, which proved again that TiO₂ can effectively inhibit the volume expansion. Among the etched samples, FT-1h possesses the best performance. Figure 11C shows that FT-1h still has good cycling performance after the large rate performance test, while the reversible capacities of pure α-Fe₂O₃ and pure TiO₂ are low. The as-prepared α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ in this work shows superior cyclability and capacity compared with others summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. List of the reported works on Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ as anodes for lithium-ion batteries.

EIS resistance tests are conducted for pure α-Fe₂O₃, pure TiO₂, and FT-1h, and the Nyquist plots of FT-1h, pure α-Fe₂O₃, and pure TiO₂ are shown in Figure 11D. All of them exhibit a similar profile. There is a depressed semicircle in the high-frequency region and an inclined line in the low-frequency region. The diameter of the semicircle in the high-frequency region of each cell is related to the tenable resistance of the electrolyte (R_e), SEI layer (R_s), and charge transfer resistance (R_ct) (Wang et al., 2020). R_ct is associated with the transfer of electrons and Li⁺. The inclined line in the low-frequency region represents the Warburg impedance (Z_w), which is derived from lithium-ion diffusion in electrode materials. A semicircle with a larger diameter in the high-frequency region represents a larger R_ct (Yang et al., 2019). From Figure 11D, it can be found that the impedance of α-Fe₂O₃ alone is relatively large, and the impedance decreases after coating with TiO₂, indicating that the electrical conductivity of the electrode is improved by forming a composite material. In addition, the higher slope of FT-1h compared with pure α-Fe₂O₃ in the low-frequency region is evidence of a stronger interaction between Li ions and FT-1h.

Conclusion

In summary, the volume expansion rates of α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂ during Li-ion insertion were estimated through DFT calculations. The expansion rate of α-Fe₂O₃ with Li-ion insertion is clearly higher than that of TiO₂, indicating that TiO₂ could effectively alleviate crystal expansion when used in Li-ion batteries. Hence, to buffer the bulk expansion of α-Fe₂O₃ that occurs during the discharge/charge process, cubic α-Fe₂O₃ was coated with a TiO₂ layer (α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂) using the hydrothermal method, and then a buffer chamber was deliberately designed by immersing in hydrochloric acid for etching. It is found that α-Fe₂O₃@TiO₂ with a buffer chamber structure could effectively relieve the volume expansion. Due to these structural advantages, the optimized FT-1h sample exhibits high reversible capacities of 1,489.3, 586.8, 438.7, 332.7, and 224.5 mA h g⁻¹ at 100 mA g⁻¹, 200 mA g⁻¹, 500 mA g⁻¹, 1 A g⁻¹, and 2 A g⁻¹, respectively. When the current density is returned to 100 mA g⁻¹, the reversible capacity remains unchanged at 555.5 mA h g⁻¹. Thanks to the buffer chambers, FT-1h demonstrates good cycling performance. After 150 charge–discharge cycles at a current density of 100 mA g⁻¹, the reversible capacity is 893.7 mA h g⁻¹, the Coulombic efficiency is 98.4%, and the morphology is in a good condition. Furthermore, the results obtained in this study provide new insights into the synthesis of metal oxide-based LIB anode materials with well-designed structures.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author Contributions

BW, BN, and DW designed the calculations and experiments. HR and CM performed the material synthesis, characterization, and battery tests. CP and WP analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. XC, LZ, JL, and XS conducted the calculation. YS and RT made the major revision. All authors participated in discussions.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. U1904198), the Science and Technology Department of Henan Province (No. 202102210001), the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (No. 202300410015), the Key Scientific Research Project of Higher Education of Henan Province (No. 20B140012), and the Ninth Group of Key Disciplines in Henan Province (No. 2018119).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.866369/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure S1 | Unit cells of α-Fe₂O₃ (A) and TiO₂ (B).

Supplementary Figure S2 | XRD of α-Fe₂O₃.

Supplementary Figure S3 | SEM images of pure Fe₂O₃ (A,B) and FT-1h (C,D) after 100 charge–discharge cycles.

Supplementary Table S1 | Data compared with other theoretical and experimental data for α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO_2.

Supplementary Table S2 | Volume (V) and expansion rate (E_r) of the one, two, three, four, and five and one, second, and three Li ions inserted in the cell at different sites of α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂.,

Supplementary Table S3 | Electronic population of Fe-O and Ti-O bonds for α-Fe₂O₃ and TiO₂ with and without Li inserted at symmetrical sites.

Supplementary Table S4 | Average core–shell size of oxalic acid-treated α-Fe₂O₃ coated with TiO₂ and etched for different periods of time (FT-0.5h (A-C), FT-2h (D-F), FT-4h (G-I), and FT-12h (J-L) (pure TiO₂).

References

Aouadi, S. M. (2006). Structural and Mechanical Properties of TaZrN Films: Experimental and Ab Initio Studies. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 053507. doi:10.1063/1.2178394

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arlt, T., Bermejo, M., Blanco, M. A., Gerward, L., Jiang, J. Z., Staun Olsen, J., et al. (2000). High-pressure Polymorphs of anataseTiO2. Phys. Rev. B 61, 14414–14419. doi:10.1103/physrevb.61.14414

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Liang, J., Tian, Q., Zhang, W., and Sui, Z. (2020). Facile Construction of Clustered Fe2O3/TiO2 Composite for Improved Lithium Storage Performance. Synth. Met. 263, 116353. doi:10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116353

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duffner, F., Kronemeyer, N., Tübke, J., Leker, J., Winter, M., and Schmuch, R. (2021). Post-lithium-ion Battery Cell Production and its Compatibility with Lithium-Ion Cell Production Infrastructure. Nat. Energ. 6, 123–134. doi:10.1038/s41560-020-00748-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, K., Rong, J., and Yu, X. (2021). A Coordinated Regulation Strategy to Improve Electronic Conductivity and Li-Ion Transport for TiO2 Lithium Battery Anode Materials. J. Alloys Compd. 860, 158282. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158282

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Finger, L. W., and Hazen, R. M. (1980). Crystal Structure and Isothermal Compression of Fe2O3, Cr2O3, and V2O3 to 50 Kbars. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 5362. doi:10.1063/1.327451

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, Y., Wei, Q., Wang, X., Shu, H., Yang, X., and Sun, S. (2015). Porous Hollow α-Fe2O3@TiO2 Core-Shell Nanospheres for superior Lithium/sodium Storage Capability. J. Mater. Chem. A. 3, 13807–13818. doi:10.1039/c5ta02994e

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Wang, C., Hu, P., He, F., Wu, M., and Zhang, H. (2019). Carbon-incorporated, Nitrogen-Doped branch-like TiO2 Nanostructure towards superior Lithium Storage Performance. J. Alloys Compd. 787, 944–951. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, M., and Li, H. (2021). The Hydrolyzed Mil-88B(Fe) with Improved Surface Area for High-Capacity Lithium Ion Battery. Front. Energ. Res. 9, 781008. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.781008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hohenberg, P. (1964). Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871. doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huo, J., Ren, Y., Xue, Y., Liu, Y., and Guo, S. (2021). Sulfur/nitrogen Dual-Doped Three-Dimensional Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified with Mesoporous TiO2 Nanoparticles for Promising Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes. J. Alloys Compd. 868, 159183. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159183

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jenness, G. R., Seiter, J., and Shukla, M. K. (2018). DFT Investigation on the Adsorption of Munition Compounds on α-Fe2O3: Similarity and Differences with α-Al2O3. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 18850–18861. doi:10.1039/c8cp02590h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, L., Yuan, J., Shellikeri, A., Naderi, R., Qin, N., Lu, Y., et al. (2021). An Overview on Design Parameters of Practical Lithium‐Ion Capacitors. Batteries & Supercaps 4, 749–757. doi:10.1002/batt.202000296

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaprans, K., Mateuss, J., Dorondo, A., Bajars, G., Kucinskis, G., Lesnicenoks, P., et al. (2018). Electrophoretically Deposited α-Fe2O3 and TiO2 Composite Anchored on rGO with Excellent Cycle Performance as Anode for Lithium Ion Batteries. Solid State Ionics 319, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ssi.2018.01.042

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, T., Song, W., Son, D.-Y., Ono, L. K., and Qi, Y. (2019). Lithium-ion Batteries: Outlook on Present, Future, and Hybridized Technologies. J. Mater. Chem. A. 7, 2942–2964. doi:10.1039/c8ta10513h

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kohn, W., and Sham, L. J. (1965). Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138. doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kong, D., Cheng, C., Wang, Y., Liu, B., Huang, Z., and Yang, H. Y. (2016). Seed-assisted Growth of α-Fe2O3 Nanorod Arrays on Reduced Graphene Oxide: a superior Anode for High-Performance Li-Ion and Na-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 4, 11800–11811. doi:10.1039/c6ta04370d

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Hu, Z., Xia, Q., Zhang, H., Li, Z., Wang, H., et al. (2021a). Operando Magnetometry Probing the Charge Storage Mechanism of CoO Lithium‐Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006629. doi:10.1002/adma.202006629

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Niu, B., Zhang, W., and Wu, D. (2021). Synergistic Mediation of Polysulfide Immobilization and Conversion by a Catalytic and Dual-Adsorptive System for High Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 406, 126802. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126802

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Wu, L.-J., Zhang, S.-G., Yao, C., Chao, C.-Y., Yue, H.-W., et al. (2020). Facile Synthesis of Mesoporous One-Dimensional Fe2O3 Nanowires as Anode for Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 832, 155008. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Wang, N., Deng, J., Qian, W., and Chu, W. (2018). Flexible Metal-Templated Fabrication of Mesoporous Onion-like Carbon and Fe2O3@N-Doped Carbon Foam for Electrochemical Energy Storage. J. Mater. Chem. A. 6, 13012–13020. doi:10.1039/c8ta02417k

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Q., Li, H., Xia, Q., Hu, Z., Zhu, Y., Yan, S., et al. (2021b). Extra Storage Capacity in Transition Metal Oxide Lithium-Ion Batteries Revealed by In Situ Magnetometry. Nat. Mater. 20, 76–83. doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0756-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Zhang, Y., and Huang, J. (2019a). Three-dimensional TiO2 Nanotubes Immobilized with Fe2O3 Nanoparticles as an Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 783, 793–800. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.371

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Mao, Y., Tian, Q., Zhang, W., and Yang, L. (2019b). Extremely Facile Preparation of High-Performance Fe2O3 Anode for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 784, 125–133. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.392

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, Y., Xiong, X., Xu, Z., Xia, Q., Wan, L., Liu, R., et al. (2020). Ultrathin 2D Mesoporous TiO2/rGO Heterostructure for High-Performance Lithium Storage. Small 16, e2000030. doi:10.1002/smll.202000030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Monkhorst, H. J., and Pack, J. D. (1976). Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192. doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Narsimulu, D., Nagaraju, G., Sekhar, S. C., Ramulu, B., and Yu, J. S. (2019). Designed Lamination of Binder-free Flexible Iron Oxide/carbon Cloth as High Capacity and Stable Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 497, 143795. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143795

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ni, L., Wang, R., Fu, Y., Wang, H., Liu, W., Zhu, L., et al. (2019). Nanoengineering Mesoporous Graphene-Based Anatase/bronze TiO2 Heterostructures for Pseudocapacitance-Enhanced Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 790, 683–692. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.237

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nong, S., Dong, C., Wang, Y., and Huang, F. (2020). Constructing Porous TiO2 Crystals by an Etching Process for Long-Life Lithium Ion Batteries. Nanoscale 12, 18429–18436. doi:10.1039/d0nr04861e

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., and Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., and Ernzerhof, M. (1998). Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof Reply: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 891. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.891

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qi, C., Liu, C., Meng, K., Yu, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., et al. (2018). Enhanced Performance of TiO₂/α-Fe₂O₃ Nanostructure as Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 13, 265–274. doi:10.20964/2018.01.34

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, G., Zeng, M., Wu, X., Wen, J., and Li, J. (2018). Fabrication of Fe2O3@TiO2 Core-Shell Nanospheres as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 29, 12944–12950. doi:10.1007/s10854-018-9414-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qu, D., Sun, Z., Gan, S., Gao, L., Song, Z., Kong, H., et al. (2020). Two‐dimensional Fe 2 O 3/TiO 2 Composite Nanoplates with Improved Lithium Storage Properties as Anodic Materials for Lithium‐Ion Full Cells. ChemElectroChem 7, 4963–4970. doi:10.1002/celc.202001143

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, T., Duan, Y., Lv, K., Hu, Z., Li, Q., Li, M., et al. (2018). Photocatalytic Oxidation of Acetone over High Thermally Stable TiO2 Nanosheets with Exposed (001) Facets. Front. Chem. 6, 175. doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Wu, D., Wu, W., Wang, D., Gao, Z., Xu, F., et al. (2019a). Preparation of TiO2 Microspheres with Tunable Pore and Chamber Size for Fast Gaseous Diffusion in Photoreduction of CO2 under Simulated Sunlight. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 539, 194–202. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Wu, D., Yang, C., Lu, H., Gao, Z., Xu, F., et al. (2019b). Multi-functional Amorphous TiO2 Layer on ZIF-67 for Enhanced CO2 Photoreduction Performances under Visible Light. J. CO2 Utilization 34, 411–421. doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2019.07.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Zhao, L., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Yang, L., Li, F., et al. (2022). Revealing the Multiple Cathodic and Anodic Involved Charge Storage Mechanism in an FeSe2 Cathode for Aluminium-Ion Batteries by In Situ Magnetometry. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 311–319. doi:10.1039/d1ee03070a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Wu, D., Guo, Z., Yan, J., Hu, Y., Chang, Z., et al. (2018a). Ultra-thin TiO2 Sheets with Rich Surface Disorders for Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance under Simulated Sunlight. J. Alloys Compd. 745, 26–32. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.070

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, T., Guo, W., Wang, G., Wang, H., Bai, J., and Wang, B. (2020). Highly Dispersed FeSe2 Nanoparticles in Porous Carbon Nanofibers as Advanced Anodes for Sodium and Potassium Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 834, 155265. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155265

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., Xia, J., Wang, W., Sun, S., Liu, L., et al. (2018b). Fe2O3@C Core@shell Nanotubes: Porous Fe2O3 Nanotubes Derived from MIL-88A as Cores and Carbon as Shells for High Power Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 769, 969–976. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.081

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, D., Wang, X., An, Y., Song, X., Liu, N., Wang, H., et al. (2017). Hierarchical TiO2 Structures Derived from F− Mediated Oriented Assembly as Triple-Functional Photoanode Material for Improved Performances in CdS/CdSe Sensitized Solar Cells. Electrochimica Acta 248, 79–89. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.150

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, F., Mei, J., Zheng, M., Bai, D., Wu, D., Gao, Z., et al. (2017). Au Nanoparticles Modified Branched TiO2 Nanorod Array Arranged with Ultrathin Nanorods for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Alloys Compd. 693, 1124–1132. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.273

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, X., Jiang, F., Sun, X., Du, R., Zhang, M., Kang, L., et al. (2020). A Simple, Low-Cost and Scale-Up Synthesis Strategy of Spherical-graphite/Fe2O3 Composites as High-Performance Anode Materials for Half/full Lithium Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 822, 153719. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153719

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Liu, Q., Cao, M., Ju, Q., Wang, H., Fu, R., et al. (2019). Enhanced Electrochemical Performance of α-Fe2O3 Grains Grafted onto TiO2-Carbon Nanofibers via a Vapor-Solid Reaction as Anode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 463, 322–330. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.171

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Y. F., Chen, F., Ye, L. W., Cai, G. S., Zhu, M., Yin, S. M., et al. (2019). Construction of Co3O4@TiO2 Heterogeneous Mesoporous Hollow Nanocage-In-Nanocage from Metal-Organic Frameworks with Enhanced Lithium Storage Properties. J. Alloys Compd. 790, 814–821. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.255

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, Y. F., Chen, Q., Zhu, M., Cai, G. S., and Guo, S. Y. (2021). Nano Tube-In-Tube CNT@void@TiO2@C with Excellent Ultrahigh Rate Capability and Long Cycling Stability for Lithium Ion Storage. J. Alloys Compd. 851, 156795. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156795

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, G., Shi, Y., Wang, H., Jiang, L., Yu, X., Jing, S., et al. (2019). A Facile Route to Achieve Ultrafine Fe2O3 Nanorods Anchored on Graphene Oxide for Application in Lithium-Ion Battery. J. Power Sourc. 416, 118–124. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.01.091

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, H.-X., Zhu, Y. F., and Zhao, M. (2017). Interface Charge Transfer and Enhanced Visible Light Response of Graphene/anatase TiO 2 (110) Systems with and without Oxygen Vacancy: A DFT+U Calculation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 420, 105–109. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.142

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, W., Fei, P., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Qin, C., and Wang, Z. (2018). Porous TiO2/Fe2O3 Nanoplate Composites Prepared by De-alloying Method for Li-Ion Batteries. Mater. Lett. 211, 254–257. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2017.10.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhong, Y., Ma, Y., Guo, Q., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Yang, M., et al. (2017). Controllable Synthesis of TiO2@Fe2O3 Core-Shell Nanotube Arrays with Double-Wall Coating as Superb Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes. Sci. Rep. 7, 40927. doi:10.1038/srep40927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, W., Wang, Y., Yu, Y., Hu, Y., and Chen, Y. (2020). Core-shell Structured α-Fe2O3@Li4Ti5O12 Composite as Anode Materials for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 813, 152175. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152175

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar