Chuanbin Fan1,2Xiaoyin Zhang3,4
Feng Guo1,2Zhiyong Xing1,2Junli Wang1,2Wanying Lin1Jie Tan1Guimei Huang1,5*
Ziao Zong1,2*- 1School of Laboratory Medicine, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, China
- 2Industrial College of Biomedicine and Health Industry, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, China
- 3Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Qingdao, China
- 4Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
- 5School of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
Two-dimensional (2D) metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been extensively investigated as oxygen evolution reaction (OER) materials because of their numerous advantages such as large specific surface areas, ultrathin thicknesses, well-defined active metal centers, and adjustable pore structures. Five Co-metal-organic frameworks, namely, [Co(L) (4.4′-bbidpe)H2O]n [YMUN 1 (YMUN for Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities)], {[Co2(L)2 (4.4′-bbibp)2]·[Co3(L) (4.4′-bbibp)]·DMAC}n (YMUN 2), [Co(L) (3,5-bip)]n (YMUN 3), [Co(L) (1,4-bimb)]n (YMUN 4), and [Co(L) (4.4′-bidpe)H2O]n (YMUN 5), were designed and fabricated from flexible dicarboxylic acid 1,3-bis(4′-carboxylphenoxy)benzene (H2L) and rigid/flexible imidazole ligands. Their frameworks consist of two-dimensional lamellar networks with a number of differences in their details. Their frameworks are discussed and compared, and their oxygen evolution reaction electrochemical activities and photocatalysis dye degradation properties are investigated.
Introduction
The development of green, clean, sustainable, and renewable energy storage and conversion technologies could effectively reduce the consumption of traditional fossil energies, mitigating deteriorating global environmental issues and achieving carbon-neutrality (Dinh et al., 2018; Roy et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019; Tian et al., 2019; Liang et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2021; Xue et al., 2021; Chang et al., 2022). Because of their high efficiencies, reliabilities, and environmental friendliness, water splitting, fuel cells, and metal-air batteries are the most promising of these technologies (Qin et al., 2020; Li C. et al., 2021; Du et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2021; Song et al., 2021; Zou et al., 2021). An electrochemical oxidation reaction, namely, the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), is the basic and crucial half-reaction that occurs in the overall processes of the abovementioned technologies (Li J. et al., 2021). It is well known that the high reaction energy barrier of this half-reaction is the main obstacle to practical applications of these technologies. Recently, noble metal-based materials (RuO2 and IrO2 for the OER) have been used and are considered state-of-the-art electrocatalysts. However, their low abundances in nature, high costs, and bonding instabilities hinder their practical applications (Li and Guo, 2019; Tripathy et al., 2019; Nemiwal et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2021). Therefore, the development of low-cost and high-efficiency OER electrocatalysts has become a major challenge for researchers in recent years.
Recently, non-noble metal (Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, and Cu) materials have garnered considerable interest as alternative electrocatalysts to noble metal-based materials due to their abundant reserves, low costs, and high catalytic activities (Wei et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019; Sanad et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021). MOFs, as classical porous materials, are widely applied in heterogeneous catalysis, photocatalysis, gas separation, and sensing (Shi et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2022). Non-noble MOFs are an emerging class of OER electrocatalysts, and have shown great potential due to their large specific surface areas, abundant and tunable pore structures, structural diversities, high design flexibilities, and high porosities. The rational design and fabrication of MOF electrocatalysts with abundant and exposed active sites, enriched and accessible surface areas, and diversiform constructs allowing enhanced properties such as the electrical conductivity, electrochemical activity, and stability requires more attention if they are to be utilized in practical applications. The unique structures, diversiform porosities, and enriched specific surface areas of MOFs are conducive to their improved catalytic performances. Moreover, the active sites, pore structures, sizes, and morphologies of MOF materials can be accurately tuned throughout their entire structure. The development of advanced OER electrocatalysts is of great significance for the improvement of metal-air batteries, fuel cells, and water splitting technologies (Xie et al., 2019; Liang J. et al., 2021; Chen Y. et al., 2021; Liang Z. et al., 2021; Lourenco et al., 2021). Hierarchical 2D MOFs are excellent candidate electrocatalyst materials for improved OER performance. Compared with pure carbon-based OER catalysts, the simple synthetic methodologies, one-step reaction, and moderate reaction conditions for 2D MOFs make them easily obtainable, reducing both the synthetic complexity and the high-temperature processing progress. In addition, the uniform distribution of dense metal nodes generates a large number of accessible active sites on 2D MOFs, which is undoubtedly beneficial for improving their catalyst activities. The tunable compositions and controllable topologies of 2D MOFs, particularly with regard to mixed organic linkers and polymetallic nodes, are beneficial for regulating their electronic structure and the adsorption kinetics of active sites, thus improving their intrinsic activities. Therefore, the development of 2D MOF electrocatalyst materials is essential for fundamental research on the OER.
2D MOFs present numerous advantages such as sheet-like structures and edges as well as unsaturated coordinative metal sites on their surfaces, which reduce their electrical resistance and increase electron transport, allowing superior OER electrical activity compared with 3D bulk MOFs. Therefore, in this work, a series of Co-MOFs, namely, [Co(L) (4.4′-bbidpe)H2O]n (YMUN 1), {[Co2(L)2 (4.4′-bbibp)2]·[Co3(L) (4.4′-bbibp)]·DMAC}n (YMUN 2), [Co(L) (3,5-bip)]n (YMUN 3), [Co(L) (1,4-bimb)]n (YMUN 4), and [Co(L) (4.4′-bidpe)H2O]n (YMUN 5) were designed and synthesized from flexible 1,3-bis(4′-carboxylphenoxy)benzene (H2L, Scheme 1) and various imidazole ligands (Scheme 2) using solvothermal methods. The Co-MOFs exhibited different 2D lamellar networks; the frameworks of 1–5 were discussed and compared. Their OER electrochemical activities and photocatalysis dye degradation properties were investigated.
SCHEME 1. The selected O-donor organic ligand in YMUN 1–5 (the gray ball represents carbon, the white ball hydrogen, and the red ball oxygen).
SCHEME 2. (A–E) The selected N-donor organic ligands in YMUN 1–5 (the gray ball represents carbon, the white ball hydrogen, the red ball oxygen, and the blue ball nitrogen).
Experimental section
Materials and general characteristics
Please refer to the Supplementary Material for information on the materials used and the general characteristics of the MOFs.
Synthesis of Co-metal-organic frameworks
The five MOFs (YMUN 1–5) were obtained in crystalline form using a solvothermal method. A Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave (23 ml) was used to synthesize YMUN 1. The reagents were mixed under stirring for 0.5 h, transferred to the autoclave, and heated to 130 C for 72 h (heating rate: 1 min/°C from 30 to 130 C), followed by cooling to ambient temperature (rate: 5 min/°C). Violet, blocky crystals were obtained. The syntheses of 2–5 were similar to that of one and all obtained products were identical in color.
[Co(L) (4.4′-bbidpe)H2O]n (YMUN 1).
H2L (0.035 g, 0.1 mmol), 4,4′-bbidpe (0.080 g, 0.2 mmol), Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.058 g, 0.20 mmol), DI water, and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) were used as reagents. Elemental analysis (%): calculated for C46H32CoN4O8: C, 66.75; H, 3.90; N, 6.77. Found: C, 66.25; H, 3.40; N, 6.07. Yield: 45 mg, 0.054 mmol, and 54% based on H2L. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3,631 (m), 3,436 (w), 1920 (w), 1,595 (s), 1,544 (m), 1,507 (s), 1,479 (s), 1,462 (m), 1,419 (s), 1,396 (s), 1,323 (w), 1,301 (m), 1,269 (s), 1,229 (s), 1,161 (s), 1,122 (m), 1,096 (w), 1,011 (w), 990 (m), 969 (m), 909 (w), 870 (m), 832 (m), 781 (m), 742 (m), 696 (w), 651 (w), 617 (w), 576 (w), 532 (w), 464 (w), and 430 (w).
{[Co2(L)2 (4.4′-bbibp)2]·[Co3(L) (4.4′-bbibp)]·DMAC}n (YMUN 2).
H2L (0.035 g, 0.1 mmol), 4,4′-bbibp (0.079 g, 0.2 mmol), Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.058 g, 0.20 mmol), DI water, and N,N- -dimethylacetamide (DMAC) were used as reagents. Elemental analysis (%): calculated for C142H101Co3N13O20: C, 68.60; H, 4.10; N, 7.32. Found: C, 67.85; H, 3.90; N, 6.70. Yield: 49 mg, 0.02 mmol, and 59% based on H2L. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3,417 (w), 1,626 (m), 1,591 (w), 1,566 (w), 1,508 (s), 1,479 (m), 1,458 (m), 1,405 (s), 1,297 (w), 1,264 (m), 1,223 (s), 1,165 (m), 1,144 (w), 1,229 (s), 1,119 (w), 1,012 (w), 966 (w), 858 (w), 830 (w), 818 (w), 784 (w), 735 (w), 710 (w), 646 (w), 616 (w), 584 (w), 531 (w), and 461 (w).
[Co(L) (3,5-bip)]n (YMUN 3).
H2L (0.035 g, 0.1 mmol), 3,5-bip (0.046 g, 0.2 mmol), Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.058 g, 0.20 mmol), DI water, and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) were used as reagents. Elemental analysis (%): calculated for C31H23CoN5O7: C, 58.50; H, 3.64; N, 11.00. Found: C, 58.10; H, 3.10; N, 10.20. Yield: 41 mg, 0.065 mmol, and 65% based on H2L. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3,436 (m), 3,143 (w), 1,599 (s), 1,561 (m), 1,507 (s), 1,479 (m), 1,416 (w), 1,378 (s), 1,312 (w), 1,266 (m), 1,226 (s), 1,165 (m), 1,123 (w), 1,068 (w), 1,012 (w), 969 (w), 862 (w), 832 (w), 784 (m), 744 (w), 696 (w), 651 (w), 497 (w), and 467 (w).
[Co(L) (1,4-bimb)]n (YMUN 4).
H2L (0.035 g, 0.1 mmol), 1,4-bimb (0.048 g, 0.2 mmol), Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.058 g, 0.20 mmol), DI water, and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) were used as reagents. Elemental analysis (%): calculated for C34H26CoN4O6: C, 63.26; H, 4.06; N, 8.68. Found: C, 62.80; H, 3.90; N, 8.10. Yield: 46 mg, 0.072 mmol, and 72% based on H2L. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3,135 (m), 1,591 (s), 1,562 (w), 1,520 (m), 1,499 (w), 1,478 (s), 1,442 (m), 1,411 (s), 1,388 (s), 1,263 (m), 1,218 (s), 1,158 (m), 1,110 (s), 1,091 (m), 1,013 (w), 963 (s), 946 (m), 856 (m), 827 (w), 795 (w), 783 (w), 771 (w), 751 (m), 687 (w), 655 (m), 620 (w), 594 (w), 493 (w), and 474 (w).
[Co(L) (4.4′-bidpe)H2O]n (YMUN 5).
H2L (0.035 g, 0.1 mmol), 4,4′-bidpe (0.060 g, 0.2 mmol), Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.058 g, 0.20 mmol), DI water, and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) were used as reagents. Elemental analysis (%): calculated for C38H28CoN4O8: C, 62.73; H, 3.88; N, 7.70. Found: C, 62.10; H, 3.20; N, 6.90. Yield: 44 mg, 0.061 mmol, and 61% based on H2L. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3,446 (m), 3,386 (w), 1,594 (s), 1,514 (s), 1,480 (s), 1,397 (s), 1,304 (w), 1,235 (s), 1,214 (s), 1,160 (m), 1,120 (m), 1,063 (m), 1,011 (w), 966 (s), 855 (m), 830 (m), 800 (m), 780 (m), 740 (m), 705 (w), 654 (m), 616 (w), 552 (w), 526 (w), and 492 (w).
The crystallographic data and structure refinement for YMUN 1–5 are summarized in Table 1. Supplementary Table S1 lists the related bond lengths and angles in 1–5. The CCDC numbers for 1–5 are 2195002, 2195003, 2194999, 2195001, and 2195000, respectively.
TABLE 1. Summary of crystal data and structure refinement parameters for YMUN 1–5a.
Results and discussion
Structure analysis
[Co(L) (4.4′-bbidpe)H2O]n (YMUN 1).
One exhibits the P21/n space group of the monoclinic system, determined by crystal data analysis. The asymmetric unit comprises one Co atom, one coordinated water molecule, 1 L2− ligand, and one 4,4′-bbidpe ligand (Figure 1A). The H2L carboxylate ligand presents a µ2-η1:η1:η1:η0 (L2−, Scheme 3B) coordinated mode while that of the imidazole ligand (4.4′-bbidpe) is µ2-η1:η1 (Scheme 3F). The Co atom is six-fold coordinated by four oxygen atoms from one water molecule and from the two–COO− groups in 2 L2− ligands, and by two nitrogen atoms from two isolated 4,4′-bbidpe imidazole ligands, giving a distorted octahedron (CoO4N2) coordination geometry. The neighboring L2− and 4,4′-bbidpe ligands connect, forming a 2D lamellar structure (Figure 1B). Three neighbor 2D lamellar structures interact with one another, forming a 2D three-fold interpenetrating stratified network, based on the spacious nature of a single 2D lamellar structure (Figure 1C). Finally, these neighboring interpenetrating 2D stratified networks are balanced to form a 3D framework through weak π···π interactions (Figure 1D).
FIGURE 1. (A) Coordination unit of the Co ion in YMUN 1 ((hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity), symmetry codes: (i) -x+2, -y, -z+1; (ii) x+1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2; (iii) x-1/2, -y+3/2, z-1/2.); (B) view of the single 2D lamellar structure of 1; (C) view of the three-fold interpenetrating 2D stratified network through the 2D lamellar structure of one along the a axis; and (D) view of the 3D framework through the 2D stratified network with weak interactions occurring along the b axis.
SCHEME 3. (A–H) The various coordination modes of O/N-donor ligands in YMUN 1–5 (the gray ball represents carbon, the red ball oxygen, the blue ball nitrogen, the violet ball cobalt, and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).
{[Co2(L)2 (4.4′-bbibp)2]·[Co3(L) (4.4′-bbibp)]·DMAC}n (YMUN 2).
The crystal data reveal that two exhibits the P21/n space group of the monoclinic system. Its asymmetric unit consists of three Co atoms, 3 L2− ligands, three 4,4′-bbibp ligands, and one DMAC molecule (Figure 2A). As shown in Scheme 3, the coordinated mode of the H2L carboxylate ligand is µ2-η1:η0:η1:η0 (L2−, Scheme 3A) while that of the imidazole ligand (4.4′-bbibp) is µ2-η1:η1 (Scheme 3E). The coordination environments of Co1, Co2, and Co3 are identical; four-fold coordinated by two oxygen atoms from the two–COO− groups in two HL4− ligands, and by two nitrogen atoms from two independent 4,4′-bbibp imidazole ligands. The three Co ions differ in the bond lengths and angles of Co–O/N and the bonding angle of O/N-donor ligands. Based on these discrepancies, the neighboring L2− and 4,4′-bbidpe ligands connect through Co ion metal centers, forming two different kinds of 2D lamellar structures. The compositional ratio of the two different 2D lamellar structures in the three-fold interpenetrating 2D stratified network is 1:2 (Figure 2B). Finally, the neighboring interpenetrating 2D stratified networks are balanced to form a 3D framework through weak π···π interactions (Figure 2C).
FIGURE 2. (A) Coordination environment of the Co ion in YMUN 2 ((hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity), symmetry codes: (i) -x+5/2, y+1/2, -z+5/2; (ii) -x+3/2, y+1/2, -z+3/2; (iii) -x+1, -y+2, -z+1; (iv) x-1/2, -y+3/2, z-1/2; (v) -x+5/2, y-1/2, -z+5/2; (vi) -x+3/2, y-1/2, -z+3/2; (vii) x+1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2.); (B) view of the three-fold interpenetrating 2D stratified network through the different 2D lamellar structures of 2; (C) view of the 3D framework through the 2D stratified network with weak interactions occurring along the b axis.
[Co(L) (3,5-bip)]n (YMUN 3).
Three exhibits the Pī space group of the triclinic system, determined by crystal data analysis. The asymmetric unit comprises one Co atom, one 3,5-bip ligand, and 1 L2− ligand (Figure 3A). As shown in Scheme 3, the H2L carboxylate ligand presents a µ2-η1:η0:η1:η0 (L2−, Scheme 3A) coordinated mode while that of the imidazole ligand (3,5-bip) is µ2-η1:η1 (Scheme 3H). The Co atom is four-fold coordinated by two oxygen atoms from 2 L2− ligands, and by two nitrogen atoms from two isolated 3,5-bip imidazole ligands, giving a distorted tetrahedron (CoO2N2) coordination geometry. The H2L carboxylate ligands connect through the Co ions, forming one toroidal structure; these toroidal structures then connect with the 3,5-bip imidazole ligands to form a 1D container-like structure (Figure 3B). As shown in Figure 3C, the 1D container-like structures then interlock with one another to form interpenetrating 2D polymer networks. Finally, the interpenetrating 2D polymer networks are balanced to form a 3D framework through weak π···π interactions (Figure 3D).
FIGURE 3. (A) Coordination unit of the Co ion in YMUN 3 ((hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity), symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y, -z+1; (ii) x, y-1, z; (iii) x, y+1, z.); (B) view of the single 1D structure of 3; (C) view of the mutually-interpenetrating 2D network through the identical 1D structures of 3; (D) view of the 3D framework through the 2D stratified network with weak interactions occurring along the a axis.
[Co(L) (1,4-bimb)]n (YMUN 4).
Four exhibits the P21/n space group of the monoclinic system, determined by crystal data analysis. The asymmetric unit comprises one Co atom, 1 L2− ligand, and one 1,4-bimb ligand (Figure 4A). As shown in Scheme 3, the H2L carboxylate ligand presents a µ2-η1:η0:η1:η0 (L2−, Scheme 3C) coordinated mode while that of the imidazole ligand (1,4-bimb) is µ2-η1:η1 (Scheme 3D). As shown in Figure 4, the final framework of four is similar to that of 2.
FIGURE 4. (A) Coordination unit of the Co ion in YMUN 4 ((hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity), symmetry codes: (i) -x, y+1/2, -z+3/2; (ii) -x+3, y+1/2, -z+3/2; (iii) -x, y-1/2, -z+3/2; (iv) -x+3, y-1/2, -z+3/2.); (B) view of the single 2D lamellar structure of 4; (C) view of the three-fold interpenetrating 2D stratified network through the identical 2D lamellar structures of four along the c axis; (D) view of the 3D framework through the 2D stratified network with weak interactions occurring along the a axis.
[Co(L) (4.4′-bidpe)H2O]n (YMUN 5).
Fiveexhibits the P21/n space group of the monoclinic system, determined by crystal data analysis. As shown in Figure 5, the coordination mode, formation process, and final structure of five are similar to those of 1.
FIGURE 5. (A) Coordination unit of the Co ion in YMUN 5 ((hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity), symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y, -z+1; (ii) x-1/2, -y+3/2, z-1/2; (iii) x+1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2.); (B) view of the single 2D lamellar structure of 5; (C) view of the three-fold interpenetrating 2D stratified network through the identical 2D lamellar structures of 5; (D) view of the 3D framework through the 2D stratified network with weak interactions occurring along the b axis.
Structural discussion and comparison
In this work, a flexible H2L ligand, acting as a main ligand, was used to synthesize five types of metal organic framework materials containing cobalt ions and different imidazole ligands. As shown in Scheme 3, three coordination modes existed for the flexible H2L ligand in YMUN 1–5, owing to the different auxiliary ligands (flexible 4,4′-bbidpe, rigid 4,4′-bbibp, rigid 3,5-bip, flexible 1,4-bimb, and flexible 4,4′-bidpe) and reaction solvents used. The interpenetrated frameworks were formed based on the flexibility and various configurations of the main H2L ligand. The O/N-donor ligands connected with one another to form 2D layered structures in 1, 2, 4, and 5, and a 1D chain in three due to the length and flexibility of the auxiliary ligands. Finally, the formation of three-fold interpenetrating 2D stratified networks is different for 1, 2, 4, and five compared with 3. The six imidazole auxiliary ligands all exhibit syn conformations (Schemes 3D–H). The frameworks were obtained using two different types of solvent reactions (DI water and DMAC (8 ml, v/v = 1:1), 130 C for 1, 2, 4, and 5, and DI water and DMF (8 ml, v/v = 1:1), 130 C for 3). Thus, a series of Co MOFs were successfully designed by utilizing different imidazole auxiliary ligands and reaction solvents.
Thermal stability and purity
The thermogravimetric stabilities of YMUN 1–5, which are vital evaluation parameters of their potential performance in catalytic applications, were determined. The TG curves, as displayed in Supplementary Figure S1, reveal that the entire skeleton structures of 1–5 remained intact up to 300 C. The skeletons of 1–5 collapsed at temperatures of 320 C, 355 C, 322 C, 360 C, and 348 C, respectively. PXRD measurements were performed to evaluate the phase purities of 1–5. The PXRD profiles show that the characteristic diffraction peaks obtained for 1–5 match well with those obtained for simulated single crystal PXRD patterns (Supplementary Figures S2–S6). The preeminent thermal stabilities and phase purities of 1–5 indicate that they should perform exceptionally in practical applications.
Microstructure and porosity analysis
The specific surface area and porosity are prominent characteristics of 2D MOF electrocatalysis materials. The morphologies of two and four were studied using SEM (Supplementary Figure S7). These MOFs display a bulk structure composed of numerous stacked sheet-like layers, which favor the transport of electrolytes and gas emissions. BET gas-sorption measurements demonstrate the porosities of the 2D MOFs. According to IUPAC classification, the adsorption performance of two and four corresponds to type-III isotherms. The BET specific surface areas of two and four are approximately 1.50 m2 g−1 and 1.55 m2 g−1, respectively, and the average pore diameters are approximately 18.7 nm and 14.6 nm, respectively, owing to the presence of flaky cracks in the composites. (Supplementary Figure S8, Supplementary Table S2). These results demonstrate that two and four exhibit a mesoporous structure, providing enough space for internal active sites and allowing them to be fully exposed.
Electrochemical evaluation of YMUN 1–5 for the oxygen evolution reaction
The OER properties of 1–5 were investigated based on the extensive electrochemical applications of transition metal cobalt polymer materials (Chen C. et al., 2021; Liang et al., 2022; Peng et al., 2022). The electrocatalytic performances of 1–5 for the OER were examined in a 1.0 M alkaline KOH electrolyte at room temperature using a three-electrode setup. As shown in Figure 6A, the LSV curves of 1–5 show that they exhibited overpotentials of 373 mV for 1, 349 mV for 2, 374 mV for 3, 297 mV for 4, and 380 mV for 5, at a current density of 10 mA cm−2 and a scan rate of 5 mV s−1 (Table 2). The overpotential of four was lower than the other four catalyst materials. Notably, four also exhibited a lower overpotential of 450 mV at a higher current density of 90 mA cm−2 (Figure 6C). The OER reaction kinetics were investigated using the calculated Tafel plots obtained from linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) data. The Tafel slopes of 1–5 were 169.6 mV dec−1, 147.3 mV dec−1, 166.9 mV dec−1, 82.4 mV dec−1, 185.9 mV dec−1, respectively; the Tafel slope of four was lowest, illustrating favorable reaction dynamics which can significantly increase the OER rate and overpotentials (Figure 6B).
FIGURE 6. (A) LSV curves; (B) Tafel plots; (C) summary of overpotentials (at 10 and 90 mA cm−2); (D) double-layer capacitance (Cdl) plots for YMUN 1–5; (E) stabilities of two and four for the OER; (F) Nyquist plots for 1–5 in a 1.0 M KOH solution.
TABLE 2. Summarized OER catalytic parameters of different catalysts in a 1.0 M KOH electrolyte.
To further understand the OER catalytic activity of 1–5, their electrochemically active surface areas (ECSA) were determined. The ESCAs were calculated from the electrochemical double-layer capacitances (Cdl) obtained from cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves at varying scan rates (Supplementary Figures S9–S13). The following equation was utilized: ESCA = Cdl/Cs, where Cs is the capacitance per unit area of a smooth surface in an electrocatalyst material. An average value for Cs (40 μF cm−2) was used in this work since Cs is usually determined to be between 20 and 60 μF cm−2 in a 1.0 M KOH solution (Nai and Lou, 2019; Peng et al., 2022). As shown in Figure 6D, the Cdl values of 1–5 were 52 mF cm−2 for 1, 50 mF cm−2 for 2, 38 mF cm−2 for 3, 72 mF cm−2 for 4, and 105 mF cm−2 for 5. The ECSA value of four was 180 cm−2; higher than those of 1–3. The ECSA results show that 1–5 contain numerous active sites, which increase the possibility of contact between reactants and active components, hence accelerating the OER process (Nai and Lou, 2019).
Robust durability is an essential factor for outstanding electrochemical activity in practical applications. Two and four were selected to evaluate the OER long-term stability. Potential increases of approximately 37.6% for 2 and 11.5% for four were observed at a stabilized current density after 54,000 s of galvanostatic operation at 10 mA cm−2. To further determine the prominent OER performances of 1–5, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed to probe the transfer kinetics of charge carriers. Nyquist plots (Figure 6F) obtained from EIS measurements at 1.55 V (vs. RHE), displayed small electrolyte resistance values (Rs = 0.25 Ω, 0.23 Ω, 0.20 Ω, 0.22 Ω, and 0.23 Ω) for 1–5. The charge transfer resistances (Rct) of 1–5 were 1.10 Ω, 1.38 Ω, 1.05 Ω, 1.21Ω, and 1.25 Ω, respectively; well-correlated with the fast water oxidation kinetics, which were small and similar. Notably, two semicircles were observed in the Nyquist plots of 1–5, indicative of two time-constant behaviors (Figure 6F). The first behavior reflects the charge transfer resistance (Rct) that appeared in the high-frequency region. The observed low frequency semicircles correspond to the adsorption of reaction intermediates on the electrode surface, and represent the hydroxide transition properties on the surface of open metal sites (Gao et al., 2017; Jiang et al., 2017). The small values of Rc and Rct resulted in a lower applied potential and overpotential.
Based on the above test analyses, 1–5 exhibited excellent OER performances; the catalytic activities of two and four were superior. The accessibility of active sites and the electrode geometry are often key factors affecting the electrocatalytic activity. As discussed in the structural analysis section, the metal centers in two and four are four-fold coordinated with two vacant coordination sites. The five frameworks are 2D layered, three-fold interpenetrating networks; however, the formation mechanisms were different. The mechanism for framework three is 1D + 1D → 2D with a three-fold interpenetrating network, whereas 1, 2, 4, and five are 2D + 2D → 2D with three-fold interpenetrating networks. The potential active sites in the 2D layered networks are more accessible for reactants. Thus, the advantageous, discretely- and homogeneously-distributed metal nodes in these MOFs offer exceptional platforms for efficient OER.
Photocatalytic properties of YMUN 1–5 for organic dyes
Photocatalysis could be an efficient way to degrade organic dyes for purifying wastewater. Cobalt organic framework photocatalysts are widely used to decompose organic dyes in water purification processes, owing to their highly active metal center (Fan et al., 2018). Therefore, 1–5 were employed to decompose the common organic dyes methyl violet (MV) and methylene blue (MB), under UV irradiation, in order to evaluate their photocatalytic efficiencies for wastewater purification. The degradation activities of 1–5 in MB/MV solutions were monitored over a time period of 0–180 min using spectroscopy (Supplementary Figures S14–S18). As shown in Figure 7, the degradation ratios of 1–5 for MB were 72.13%, 77.92%, 69.82%, 68.35%, and 69.23%, respectively. The degradation ratios of 1–5 for MV were 80.07%, 91.47%, 82.26%, 77.11%, and 81.78%, respectively. The catalytic activities of 1–5 were higher for MV than MB, and two exhibited the highest degradation ratio. Therefore, two could be used as a potential photo-catalyst for the removal of MV dye. The UV-Vis DRS and optical band gaps were determined to gain an insight into the semiconductor behaviors of 1–5. As shown in Supplementary Figures S19–S23, strong and broad-range ultraviolet light absorption in the 220–340 nm range was observed for 1–5, attributed to π→π* transitions in the ligands or ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) (Othong et al., 2017). In addition, a relatively weak absorption band was observed at 440–620 nm for 1–5; the d→d spin-allowed transition of Co2+ (d7) ions (Liu et al., 2014). Using the Kubelka-Munk function, the band gap energies (Eg) were estimated to be 3.30 eV, 3.10 eV, 3.60 eV, 3.20 eV, and 3.45 eV for 1–5, respectively, falling in the UV region (<3.1 eV for the visible region) (Sarkar et al., 2020). Based on the above structural analysis, the higher-activity sites of the coordinated unit in 2 may contribute to its distinguished photocatalytic properties. To quantify the stability of 2 after reaction with the dye, PXRD was performed (Supplementary Figure S24). The results indicate that the structure of two remained unchanged after dye degradation, thus proving it to be a stable photocatalyst.
FIGURE 7. Degradation rates of MB/MV dye solutions with YMUN 1–5 under UV irradiation.
Conclusion
In summary, we have successfully synthesized five Co-MOFs exhibiting sheet-like frameworks using a solvothermal method at mild conditions (130 C). The structures of the Co-MOFs are discussed and compared, and the results indicate that three types of networks are formed. Among the five MOFs, four exhibits superior electrocatalytic activity performance for the OER, with a low overpotential and a small Tafel slope. The ESCA, the electrolyte resistance (Rs), and the charge transfer resistance (Rct) for four are 180 cm−2, 0.22 Ω, and 1.21Ω, respectively. Moreover, four exhibits long-term durability for at least 54,000 s at a current density of 10 mA cm−2, highlighting its robust stability in alkaline conditions. The strategy of constructing 2D layered MOFs with empty active sites is a promising method for the rational design and synthesis of high-performance OER electrocatalysts. The photocatalytic performance of two suggests that it may be a promising photocatalyst.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors. CCDC 2195002, 2195003, 2194999, 2195001, 2195000, for MOFs 1–5 include the crystal data for this paper. These data can be freely accessed via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, United Kingdom; fax: + 44 1223336033.
Author contributions
The original idea was conceived by CF, GH, and ZZ; experiments and data analyses were performed by WL and JT; structural characterization was performed by GH, ZX, and CF; the manuscript was drafted by FG, JW, and CF. All authors have given final approval for the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Base and the Talent Special Project for Guangxi Province (Grant Nos. AD22035154 and AD20297056), the Basic Ability Improvement Project for Young and Middle-Aged Teachers in Guangxi Colleges and Universities (Grant No. 2022KY0536), and the Scientific Research and Technology Development Program Project for Baise City (Grant No. 20213245).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.1044313/full#supplementary-material
References
Chang, G. R., Zhang, H., and Yu, X. Y. (2022). 2D metal–organic frameworks and their derivatives for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Alloys Compd. 919, 165823. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165823
Chen, C., Tuo, Y., Lu, Q., Lu, H., Zhang, S. Y., Zhou, Y., et al. (2021a). Hierarchical trimetallic Co-Ni-Fe oxides derived from core-shell structured metal-organic frameworks for highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 287, 119953. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119953
Chen, Y., Gao, R., Ji, S., Li, H., Tang, K., Jiang, P., et al. (2021b). Atomic-level modulation of electronic density at cobalt single-atom sites derived from metal-organic frameworks: Enhanced oxygen reduction performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (6), 3212–3221. doi:10.1002/anie.202012798
Dinh, C. T., Jain, A., de Arquer, F. P. G., De Luna, P., Li, J., Wang, N., et al. (2018). Multi-site electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution in neutral media by destabilization of water molecules. Nat. Energy 4 (2), 107–114. doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0296-8
Du, J., Li, F., and Sun, L. (2021). Metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (4), 2663–2695. doi:10.1039/d0cs01191f
Fan, C. B., Zong, Z. A., Zhang, X., Xu, C. G., Zhu, Z., Meng, X. M., et al. (2018). Rational assembly of functional Co-MOFs via a mixed-ligand strategy: Synthesis, structure, topological variation, photodegradation properties and dye adsorption. CrystEngComm 20 (34), 4973–4988. doi:10.1039/c8ce00868j
Gao, W., Yan, M., Cheung, H. Y., Xia, Z. M., Zhou, X. M., Qin, Y. B., et al. (2017). Modulating electronic structure of CoP electrocatalysts towards enhanced hydrogen evolution by Ce chemical doping in both acidic and basic media. Nano Energy 38, 290–296. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.06.002
Hu, L. Y., Li, W. R., Wang, L., and Wang, B. (2021). Turning metal-organic frameworks into efficient single-atom catalysts via pyrolysis with a focus on oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. EnergyChem 3 (3), 100056. doi:10.1016/j.enchem.2021.100056
Jiang, J., Huang, L., Liu, X., and Ai, L. (2017). Bioinspired cobalt-citrate metal-organic framework as an efficient electrocatalyst for water oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (8), 7193–7201. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b16534
Li, C., Zhao, D. H., Long, H. L., and Li, M. (2021a). Recent advances in carbonized non-noble metal–organic frameworks for electrochemical catalyst of oxygen reduction reaction. Rare Met. 40 (10), 2657–2689. doi:10.1007/s12598-020-01694-w
Li, J., Liu, P., Mao, J., Yan, J., and Song, W. (2021b). Two-dimensional conductive metal–organic frameworks with dual metal sites toward the electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 9 (3), 1623–1629. doi:10.1039/d0ta10870g
Li, L. J., He, J. X., Wang, Y., Lv, X. X., Gu, X., Dai, P. C., et al. (2019). Metal–organic frameworks: A promising platform for constructing non-noble electrocatalysts for the oxygen-reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 7 (5), 1964–1988. doi:10.1039/c8ta11704g
Li, Y. J., and Guo, S. J. (2019). Noble metal-based 1D and 2D electrocatalytic nanomaterials: Recent progress, challenges and perspectives. Nano Today 28, 100774. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100774
Liang, J., Gao, X., Guo, B., Ding, Y., Yan, J., Guo, Z., et al. (2021a). Ferrocene-based metal-organic framework nanosheets as a robust oxygen evolution catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (23), 12770–12774. doi:10.1002/anie.202101878
Liang, Q. N., Chen, J. M., Wang, F. L., and Li, Y. W. (2020). Transition metal-based metal-organic frameworks for oxygen evolution reaction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 424, 213488. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213488
Liang, Z., Guo, H., Zhou, G., Guo, K., Wang, B., Lei, H., et al. (2021b). Metal-organic-framework-supported molecular electrocatalysis for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (15), 8472–8476. doi:10.1002/anie.202016024
Liang, Z. H., Guo, H. B., Lei, H. T., and Cao, R. (2022). Co porphyrin-based metal-organic framework for hydrogen evolution reaction and oxygen reduction reaction. Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (8), 3999–4002. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.055
Liu, C. Y., Chen, X. R., Chen, H. X., Niu, Z., Hirao, H., Braunstein, P., et al. (2020). Ultrafast luminescent light-up guest detection based on the lock of the host molecular vibration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (14), 6690–6697. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c00368
Liu, L., Ding, J., Huang, C., Li, M., Hou, H. E., and Fan, Y. T. (2014). Polynuclear CdII polymers: Crystal structures, topologies, and the photodegradation for organic dye contaminants. Cryst. Growth & Des. 14 (6), 3035–3043. doi:10.1021/cg500295r
Lourenco, A. A., Silva, V. D., da Silva, R. B., Silva, U. C., Chesman, C., Salvador, C., et al. (2021). Metal-organic frameworks as template for synthesis of Mn(3+)/Mn(4+) mixed valence manganese cobaltites electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 582, 124–136. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.041
Lu, X. F., Fang, Y. J., Luan, D. Y., and Lou, X. W. D. (2021). Metal–organic frameworks derived functional materials for electrochemical energy storage and conversion: A mini review. Nano Lett. 21 (4), 1555–1565. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04898
Lu, Z., Luo, W., Huang, X., Yu, H., Li, Z., Liu, G., et al. (2022). Highly-stable cobalt metal organic framework with sheet-like structure for ultra-efficient water oxidation at high current density. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 611, 599–608. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.132
Nai, J., and Lou, X. W. D. (2019). Hollow structures based on prussian blue and its analogs for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Adv. Mater. 31 (38), e1706825. doi:10.1002/adma.201706825
Nemiwal, M., Gosu, V., Zhang, T. C., and Kumar, D. (2021). Metal organic frameworks as electrocatalysts: Hydrogen evolution reactions and overall water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46 (17), 10216–10238. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.146
Othong, J., Boonmak, J., Ha, J., Leelasubcharoen, S., and Youngme, S. (2017). Thermally induced single-crystal-to-single-crystal transformation and heterogeneous catalysts for epoxidation reaction of Co(II) based metal–organic frameworks containing 1, 4-phenylenediacetic acid. Cryst. Growth & Des. 17 (4), 1824–1835. doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.6b01788
Pan, Y. D., Abazari, R., Wu, Y. H., Gao, J. K., and Zhang, Q. C. (2021). Advances in metal–organic frameworks and their derivatives for diverse electrocatalytic applications. Electrochem. Commun. 126, 107024. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2021.107024
Peng, Q., Zhuang, X., Wei, L., Shi, L., Isimjan, T. T., Hou, R., et al. (2022). Niobium-Incorporated CoSe2 nanothorns with electronic structural alterations for efficient alkaline oxygen evolution reaction at high current density. ChemSusChem 15 (16), e202200827. doi:10.1002/cssc.202200827
Qin, X. Y., Kim, D. W., and Piao, Y. Z. (2020). Metal‐organic frameworks‐derived novel nanostructured electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Carbon Energy 3 (1), 66–100. doi:10.1002/cey2.80
Roy, C., Sebok, B., Scott, S. B., Fiordaliso, E. M., Sørensen, J. E., Bodin, A., et al. (2018). Impact of nanoparticle size and lattice oxygen on water oxidation on NiFeOxHy. Nat. Catal. 1 (11), 820–829. doi:10.1038/s41929-018-0162-x
Sanad, M. F., Puente Santiago, A. R., Tolba, S. A., Ahsan, M. A., Fernandez-Delgado, O., Shawky Adly, M., et al. (2021). Co-Cu bimetallic metal organic framework catalyst outperforms the Pt/C benchmark for oxygen reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (10), 4064–4073. doi:10.1021/jacs.1c01096
Sarkar, A., Adhikary, A., Mandal, A., Chakraborty, T., and Das, D. (2020). Zn-BTC MOF as an adsorbent for iodine uptake and organic dye degradation. Cryst. Growth & Des. 20 (12), 7833–7839. doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.0c01015
Shi, Y. X., Zhang, W. H., Abrahams, B. F., Braunstein, P., and Lang, J. P. (2019). Fabrication of photoactuators: Macroscopic photomechanical responses of metal-organic frameworks to irradiation by UV light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (28), 9453–9458. doi:10.1002/anie.201903757
Song, X. Z., Zhang, N., Wang, X. F., and Tan, Z. (2021). Recent advances of metal-organic frameworks and their composites toward oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. Mater. Today Energy 19, 100597. doi:10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100597
Tian, X., Zhao, X., Su, Y. Q., Wang, L., Wang, H., Dang, D., et al. (2019). Engineering bunched Pt-Ni alloy nanocages for efficient oxygen reduction in practical fuel cells. Science 366 (6467), 850–856. doi:10.1126/science.aaw7493
Tripathy, R. K., Samantara, A. K., and Behera, J. N. (2019). A cobalt metal-organic framework (Co-MOF): A bi-functional electro active material for the oxygen evolution and reduction reaction. Dalton Trans. 48 (28), 10557–10564. doi:10.1039/c9dt01730e
Wang, M. F., Mi, Y., Hu, F. L., Niu, Z., Yin, X. H., Huang, Q., et al. (2020). Coordination-driven stereospecific control strategy for pure cycloisomers in solid-state diene photocycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2), 700–704. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b12358
Wei, X., Zhang, Y., He, H., Gao, D., Hu, J., Peng, H., et al. (2019). Carbon-incorporated NiO/Co3O4 concave surface microcubes derived from a MOF precursor for overall water splitting. Chem. Commun. 55 (46), 6515–6518. doi:10.1039/c9cc02037c
Wu, J., Yu, Z., Zhang, Y., Niu, S., Zhao, J., Li, S., et al. (2021). Understanding the effect of second metal on CoM (M = Ni, Cu, Zn) metal-organic frameworks for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Small 17 (51), e2105150. doi:10.1002/smll.202105150
Wu, Y. P., Tian, J. W., Liu, S., Li, B., Zhao, J., Ma, L. F., et al. (2019). Bi-microporous metal-organic frameworks with cubane [M4 (OH)4 ] (M=Ni, Co) clusters and pore-space partition for electrocatalytic methanol oxidation reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (35), 12185–12189. doi:10.1002/anie.201907136
Xie, S. L., Li, F., Xu, S. X., Li, J. Y., and Zeng, W. (2019). Cobalt/iron bimetal-organic frameworks as efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Chin. J. Catal. 40 (8), 1205–1211. doi:10.1016/s1872-2067(19)63384-x
Xue, W. D., Zhou, Q. X., Cui, X., Jia, S. R., Zhang, J. W., and Lin, Z. Q. (2021). Metal–organic frameworks-derived heteroatom-doped carbon electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Energy 86, 106073. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106073
Yang, Y. C., Yang, Y. W., Liu, Y. Y., Zhao, S. L., and Tang, Z. Y. (2021). Metal–organic frameworks for electrocatalysis: Beyond their derivatives. Small Sci. 1 (12), 2100015. doi:10.1002/smsc.202100015
Zhang, X. L., Hu, J. S., Cheng, X. F., Nartey, K. A., and Zhang, L. (2021). Double metal–organic frameworks derived Fe–Co–Ni phosphides nanosheets as high-performance electrocatalyst for alkaline electrochemical water splitting. Electrochimica Acta 367, 137536. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137536
Keywords: metal-organic frameworks, two-dimensional lamellar networks, oxygen evolution reaction, electrochemical activity, photocatalysis dye degradation
Citation: Fan C, Zhang X, Guo F, Xing Z, Wang J, Lin W, Tan J, Huang G and Zong Z (2022) Design of five two-dimensional Co-metal-organic frameworks for oxygen evolution reaction and dye degradation properties. Front. Chem. 10:1044313. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1044313
Received: 14 September 2022; Accepted: 17 October 2022;
Published: 10 November 2022.
Edited by:
Yujing Bi, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (DOE), United StatesReviewed by:
Zhongxin Song, Shenzhen University, ChinaJian Luo, Utah State University, United States
Xiaohong Xie, Chongqing University, China
Copyright © 2022 Fan, Zhang, Guo, Xing, Wang, Lin, Tan, Huang and Zong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ziao Zong, zongziao@126.com; Guimei Huang, guimei1128@163.com