- 1Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
- 2Materials Science and Chemical Engineering Center, Institute for Advanced Engineering, Yongin-si, Korea
- 3Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Korea
- 4Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States
Thermoelectric devices based power generation and cooling systemsystem have lot of advantages over conventional refrigerator and power generators, becausebecause of solid-state devicesdevices, compact size, good scalability, nono-emissions and low maintenance requirement with long operating lifetime. However, the applications of thermoelectric devices have been limited owingowing to their low energy conversion efficiency. It has drawn tremendous attention in the field of thermoelectric materials and devices in the 21st century because of the need of sustainable energy harvesting technology and the ability to develop higher performance thermoelectric materials through nanoscale science and defect engineering. Among various fabrication methods, electrodeposition is one of the most promising synthesis methods to fabricate devices because of its ability to control morphology, composition, crystallinity, and crystal structure of materials through controlling electrodeposition parameters. Additionally, it is an additive manufacturing technique with minimum waste materials that operates at near room temperature. Furthermore, its growth rate is significantly higher (i.e., a few hundred microns per hour) than the vacuum processes, which allows device fabrication in cost effective matter. In this paper, the latest development of various electrodeposited thermoelectric materials (i.e., Te, PbTe, Bi2Te3 and their derivatives, BiSe, BiS, Sb2Te3) in different forms including thin films, nanowires, and nanocomposites were comprehensively reviewed. Additionally, their thermoelectric properties are correlated to the composition, morphology, and crystal structure.
Overview of Thermoelectrics
Thermoelectric power generators and coolers are based on the Seebeck and the Peltier effect, respectively, where the Seebeck effect allows direct conversion of temperature gradient into electricity (Figure 1). When establishing temperature gradient at the two sides of materials, charge carriers (i.e., electronsin n-type semiconductor and holes in p-type semiconductor) would transfertransfer from hot side to cold side, which would create a voltage. voltage. The generated voltage, ΔV, is given by ΔV = S·ΔT, where S is the Seebeck coefficient and ΔT is the temperature difference. On the other hand, the Peltier effect is the generation of temperature gradient by applying electric energy. When electric energy is applied to the materials, charge carriers flow to one end of the thermoelectric materials. The charge carriers also transport energy, resulting in a temperature difference between the two ends.
FIGURE 1. Schematic illustration of thermoelectric effect including the Seebeck effect and Peltier effect.
In thermoelectric devices, the performance can be characterized by the dimensionless thermoelectric figure-of-merit (ZT), which is defined asas following equation:
where S is the Seebeck coefficient (V/K), σ is the electrical conductivity (S/m), κ is the thermal conductivity (W/mK) and T is the absolute temperature (K). (Zebarjadi et al., 2012) S2σ is defineddefined as the thermoelectric power factor (P. F.).
Additionally, the maximum energy conversion efficiency (η) of a thermoelectric device is defined as the energy produced toproduced the workwork (W) divided by the thermal energy consumed at the hot junction (Q), which is dependent on dependent onZT as well as the temperature difference of the hot and cold side (TH, TC). (Nolas et al., 2001; Snyder and Ursell, 2003; Sootsman et al., 2009; Zebarjadi et al., 2012).
Based on the definitions, high energy efficiency would be achieved by improving the thermoelectric power factor (S2σ) and suppressing the thermal conductivity. However, Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity are interdependent to each other, lead to significant difficulties to enhancing the energy efficiency (Szczech et al., 2011). For example, the Seebeck coefficient (S) is a function of the charge carrier (i.e., electrons or holes) effective mass and charge carrier concentration as shown in Eq. 3,
where e is the elementary carrier charge, kB is Boltzmann constant, m* is the charge carrier effective mass, h is Planck’s constant, and n is the charge carrier concentration. The electrical conductivity (σ) is proportional to the product of carrier concentration and carrier mobility represented (Eq. 4).
where e is the elementary charge; ne and nh are the carrier concentrations of electrons and holes, respectively; μe and μh are the carrier mobility of electrons and holes, respectively. Based on these two equations, increasing the carrier concentration enhances the electrical conductivity, but decreases the Seebeck coefficient.
The electrical conductivity (σ) and thermal conductivity (k) are also interdependent since thermal conductivity (κ) is combination of the lattice thermal conductivity (κl) and electrical thermal conductivity (κe). κe is proportional to the electrical conductivity
FIGURE 2. Interdependence of the Seebeck coefficient (S), electrical conductivity (σ), and thermal conductivity (κ) (Snyder and Toberer, 2008; Szczech et al., 2011).
In order to overcome this intrinsic demerit, numerous researchers endeavored to independently control these parameters by utilizing quantum confinement effect, phonon scattering effect, and energy filtering effect. Historical approaches to enhance the ZT have been focused on altering phonon scattering mechanism, called phonon-glass electron-crystal (PGEC), by introducing complex lattice structures such as skutterudites, superlattices, heterostructure, and nanocomposites. The enhancement of ZT in these systems was mainly achieved by reducing the thermal conductivity due to the increased phonon scattering at the interfaces. (Poudel et al., 2008). However, there is a limit for reducing the lattice thermal conductivity. Recent advancements have been achieved by incorporating metallic and/or semiconducting nanoparticles in thermoelectric matrices. (Hsu et al., 2004; Zeng et al., 2007; Zide et al., 2006). The distortions of the density of states (DOS) near Fermi level as results of carrier localization, resonant state, and carrier filtering effect fulfilled the sharp increase of the Seebeck coefficient without suppressing electrical conductivity. As shown in Figure 3, the large Seebeck coefficient can be dependent on the behavior of the scattering rates (1/τ) as a function of energy in the materials (Zebarjadi et al., 2012). The 1/τ, which is inverse function of the energy dependence of the relaxation times (τ = τ0Er), where the exponent r is called the scattering parameter. This scattering parameter, which is determined by different scatterings for example, in the case of acoustic phonon scattering, the r is -1/2, and weak impurity scattering, the r is 3/2. Therefore, an increase of the scattering parameter leads to an increase in the slope of the differential conductivity, thus also in the Seebeck coefficient.
FIGURE 3. Several possible behaviors of total relation rate (1/τ(E)) in a few kBT window. (Zebarjadi et al., 2012).
Recently, the energy filtering effect where the creation of band bending induced by charge transfer at the interfaces causes the energy-dependent scattering of charge carriers was used to decouple S and
Where υ(E) is the velocity of average charge, N(E) is the density of states, τ(E) is the charge carrier relaxation time. Furthermore, as shown in Eq. 6, the carrier relaxation time is proportional to the barrier potential (Vb) by inversion, which means tailoring a potential barrier to an effective height can be utilized to enhancing the Seebeck coefficient. (Faleev and Léonard, 2008; Martin et al., 2009; Ko et al., 2011; Sumithra et al., 2011; Narducci et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012).
Electrodeposition of Thermoelectric Materials
Xiao et al. (2008) and Boulanger (2010) reviewed the advances in the electrodeposition of thermoelectric materials in 2008 and 2010, respectively, where major focus was devoted to electrochemistry of thermoelectric materials. Rostek et al. (2015) and others (Snyder et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2013; Roth et al., 2014; Shin and Oh, 2015; Uda et al., 2015; Pelz et al., 2016) reviewed the advancement of electrodeposition of Bi2(Te,Se)3 and (Bi,Sb)2Te3 thin films and electrodeposition-based processes to form TE microdevices.
Here, the latest development of various electrodeposited thermoelectric thin films and nanostructured materials (i.e., Te, PbTe, Bi2Te3, BiSe, BiS, Sb2Te3, Cu2Se, CoSb3, Ag8SnS6, and their derivatives) were comprehensively reviewed in last 10 years. Especially, their thermoelectric properties were summarized and correlated to their composition, morphology, and crystal structure (Table 1).
TABLE 1. Correlation of material composition and microstructure with electrical and thermoelectric properties.
Electrodeposition of Tellurium
Electrodeposition of tellurium has been investigated in both acidic and alkaline media. Qiu et al. (1989) electrodeposited Te thin films with a thickness up to 4 µm on monocrystalline tellurium substrate from a TeO2-saturated aqueous solution. The thickness was relatively uniform. The needle-like surface morphology with random crystal orientation was observed when deposited on (10
Suggs et al. (1991) investigate the electrochemical nucleation and growth of Te on gold (Au) (100) surface in acidic sulfate baths (i.e., 0.4 mM TeO32- in X M H2SO4). Under potentiodynamic deposition, Te initially electrodeposited under underpotential deposition (UPD). As the deposition potential becomes more cathodic, Te electrodeposits under overpotential deposition (OPD) to from three dimensional nuclei. (Suggs and Stickney, 1991).
Ikemiya et al. (1996) electrodeposited Te films on Au (100) and Au (111) from acidic sulfate solutions (0.1 mM HTeO2+ + 0.05 M H2SO4). The atomic structures and growth morphologies of the films were investigated by in situ atomic force microscopy. Accordingly, the atomic structure of the Te deposits was independent to the substrate crystal orientation, this support the conclusion that the surface diffusion process of Te adsorbed atoms is rate-limiting steps (Ikemiya et al., 1996).
Yagi et al. (1996) electrodeposited Te in acidic perchlorate solutions with 0.1 M HClO4 and 0.5 mM TeO2 using polycrystalline gold as substrate. AuAdditionally, in situ optical second harmonic (SH) generation at two different excitation wavelengths was utilized. On 1,064 nm excitation, the SH signal varied with the surface coverage of Te (Yagi et al., 1996).
Sorenson et al. synthesized tellurium atomic layers on Au (110) by electrodeposition in the acidic bath (i.e., 0.25 mM TeO2 + 20 mM H2SO4). Additionally, the phase transitions associated with those layers was investigated. The voltammetry indicates two sub-monolayer deposition features and one for bulk. The result of the slow deposition kinetics is that surfaces composed of a single atomic layer structure are not observed. (Sorenson et al., 1999; Sorenson et al., 2001)
Jiang et al. electrodeposited Te film on polyaniline-coated macroporous phenolic foam in the solution with 1 M HNO3 and 10 mM HTeO2+. The deposited film was composed of columnar structures and had a growth direction along c-axis direction (Jiang et al., 2011). The highest Seebeck coefficient achieved for the macroporous Te film is 342 μV/K at 473 K (Jiang et al., 2012).
Abad et al. (2015) electrodeposited Te films from acidic nitrate baths (e.g., 10 mM HTeO2+ and 1 M HNO3) with sodium lignosulfonate (SLS) as additives. The presence of SLS reduced the average grain size resulted in higher electrical resistivity (∼798 µΩ m) compared to Te electrodeposits (∼229 µΩ m) in the absence of SLS. The Seebeck coefficient values were about 285 µV/K for both samples which resulted in the power factor of 280 µW/(mK2) and 82 µW/(mK2) without SLS and with SLS, respectively, at room temperature (Abad et al., 2015).
Ha et al. (2000) reported the electrochemical behavior of tellurium in alkaline baths (e.g., 10 mM TeO32- in2.5 M NaOH). In this bath, Te was able to electrodeposit between -0.8 V and -0.95 V vs. Hg/HgO, but the Te morphology was porous with needle-like radial growth (Ha et al., 2000).
Sadeghi et al. (2008) electrodeposited Te using a nickel-coated copper as substrate in alkaline plating baths. The influence of current density, temperature, and pH were systematically studied. They found that the optimum conditions to electrodeposit Te was: 6 g/L (37.6 mM) TeO2, pH of 10, and DC current density of 8.55 mA/cm2 at room temperature (Sadeghi et al., 2008).
Our group also demonstrated the ability to electrodeposit thick Te films from alkaline baths (Wu et al., 2017a) where the applied potentials were optimized to electrochemically reduced TeO3−2 (aq) to Te(s) without further reduction of Te to Te22- (aq). The XRD data revealed that the preferred orientation of thick Te films altered from (001) to (101) as the applied potential varied from −0.9 V to −1.0 V. The optimum pH ranges to deposit compact thick films was between 11.3 and 12.5. Additionally, sufficient magnetic agitation is also essential to deposit compact films. The average grain size ranged from 66 to 135 nm where larger grain size resulted in lower carrier concentration (e.g., n = 7.1 × 1018 cm−3) which might be due to lower defect density. The Highest deposition rate (upto 130 µm/h) with high current efficiency (upto 85%) was achieved by adjusting deposition conditions. Additionally, galvanic displacement reaction which is another facile method to synthesize various nanostructured Te was investigated (Chang et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2010; Hangarter et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2011; Jung et al., 2012; Elazem et al., 2013; Park et al., 2013; Suh et al., 2014; Suh et al., 2017).
Electrodeposition of Lead Telluride Based Materials
PbTe is also a narrow band-gap semiconductor with Eg of 0.31 eV measured at room temperature and a rock-salt crystal structure. PbTe can be n-type or p-type as a result of departures from stoichiometry (n-type for Pb-rich PbTe, while p-type for Te-rich PbTe). (Dughaish, 2002). The state-of-the-art commercially available PbTe based thermoelectric materials have the highest ZT of ∼0.8 at ∼ 600 K, which makes the materials a good candidate for thermoelectric application in the middle-high temperature range.
The Electrodeposition of PbTe was investigated by several groups. Saloniemi et al. reported electrodeposition of Te-rich PbTe thin films in alkaline electrolytes containing TeO2, disodium salt of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and Pb(CH3COO)2ethylenediaminetetraacetic. They utilized various electrochemical analysis methods including cyclic voltammetry and quartz crystal microbalance to investigate the electrodeposition of PbTe. They observed that Te-rich PbTe deposition through UPD of Pb on Te via six electron reduction (Saloniemi et al., 1998). The reduction of the PbEDTA2- complex to Pb(0) was a two-electron reaction whereas Te deposits via a four-electron reaction. As the potential becomes more negative, the film becomes powdery and Te(0) further reduced to Te22- as the deposition potential becomes more negative (Saloniemi et al., 2000).
Miranda et al. electrodeposited polycrystalline PbTe thin films on porous silicon from alkaline solutions with EDTA as a complexing agent for Pb. They were able to deposit PbTe thin films with the average grain size of 100 nm (Miranda et al., 2004).
Qiu et al. (2005) synthesized uniform and single-crystalline PbTe nanorods with a diameter in the sub-10-nm regime at ambient conditions using sonoelectrochemical method. In the experiment, the Pb2+ and TeO32- ions concentration were fixed at 10 mM, and the solution pH was kept at approximately 8. Nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) was used as a complex reagent. The composition of PbTe can be controlled by ratio of precusor ion/ligand concentration. When the [Pb2+]/[NTA] changed from 0.20:1 to 0.10:1 to 0.05:1, the composition of deposits changed from pure PbTe to a mixture of PbTe/Te to pure Te (Qiu et al., 2005).
Yang et al. (2008) electrodeposited PbTe nanowire arrays using template which is patterned by lithographic method. The cross-section of the synthesized PbTe nanowires is rectangular, and the width and height of the nanowires can be tuned from 60 to 400 nm and 20–100 nm, respectively. Polycrystalline PbTe with face centered cubic crystal structure and was produced by a cyclic electrodeposition-stripping method, which have grain size ranged from 10 to 20 nm. The nanowires have a length over 1 mm (Yang et al., 2008).
Erdogan et al. (2009) electrodeposited stoichiometric PbTe thin films on Au (111) substrates from alkaline baths containing EDTA, Pb2+, and TeO32- ions. They observed two dimensional nucleation and growth with the preferred orientation of (200) (Erdoğan et al., 2009).
Li et al. (2008a) electrodeposited symmetrical PbTe dendritic structures in the solution containing 10 mM Na2TeO3, 5 mM Pb(NO3)2 and 0.1 M tartaric acid. The formation of the PbTe dendritic structure is affected by the potential oscillation. The morphology of particle with dendritic structures were star-like or trigonal, and the size of the particles were varied from 100 to 500 nm. The deposited PbTe structures had a band gap energy of about 0.272 eV (Li et al., 2008a).
Additionally, many other groups reported the results of characterization of PbTe electrodeposits based on various experimental conditions which are summarized on the Table 1. (Banga et al., 2008; Diliberto et al., 2008; Jung et al., 2011; Ni et al., 2011; Frantz et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2016a; Frantz et al., 2016; Bae et al., 2017).
Electrodeposition of Bismuth Telluride (Bi2Te3) Based Materials Including BiTe, BiSbTe, BiTeSe and BiSbTeSe
Bi2Te3 with a bandgap of 0.16 eV is an excellent candidate for TE application near room temperature range (Figure 4). Electrodeposition of Bi2Te3 was investigated by various groups.
FIGURE 4. Thermoelectric performance (ZT) of the state-of-art commercial thermoelectric materials: (A) n-type and (B) p-type, as function of temperature (Snyder and Toberer, 2008).
Wang et al. (2008) synthesized high-density thermoelectric Bi2Te3/Sb heterostructure nanowire arrays with diameter of tens using AAO template-directed pulsed electrodeposition. The electrolyte included 12 mM TeO2, 4 mM Bi(NO3)3, 0.1 M Sb2O3, 0.5 M K2C6H5O7, 1 M C6H8O7, and 2 M HNO3. Additionally, was used as template (Wang et al., 2008).
Li et al. synthesized the hierarchical Bi2Te3 nanostructures by electrodeposition in the solution with 10 mM Na2TeO3, 5 mM Bi(NO3)3, 10 mM tartaric acid and 1 M HNO3 at room temperature (Li et al., 2008b; Li et al., 2008c).
Liu and Li (2008) reported that electrodeposited Bi2Te3 films had a preferential orientation of (110) and platelet grain morphology. The grain morphology changed from single-to multi-order platelets, and the texture decreased when the deposition potential became more negative, which was explained by considering geometrical selection growth and (1ī010) (ī 105) twinning of Bi2Te3 crystals (Liu and Li, 2008).
Glatz et al. (2008) electrodeposited Bi2+xTe3−x by combining potential controlled deposition pulses with galvanostatic-controlled resting pulses. The deposited had a uniform stoichiometry composition along the entire thickness. A deposition rates of 50 µm/h was achieved, and Layers thickness of 800 μm was obtained. The composition of Bi2+xTe3−x can be controlled by varying Bi ion concentration in the electrolyte with 80 mM HTeO2+ and 2 M HNO3. Bath n-type and p-type Bi2+xTe3−x, which is determined by Seebeck coefficients, was deposited (Glatz et al., 2008).
Lee et al. (2008) electrodeposited Bi2Te3 nanowires arrays using AAO as template by potentiostatic, galvanostatic, and pulsed method in aqueous solution at room temperature. Uniform Bi2Te3 nanowire arrays with highly oriented crystalline structure was synthesized, The bandgap of the deposited can be controlled from 0.21 to 0.29 eV by different relaxation times in the pulsed electrodeposition. The electrical resistances increased slightly with increasing temperatures, which was owing to enhanced carrier-phonon scattering. All samples showed a positive Seebeck coefficient (12–33 µV/K). (Lee et al., 2008).
Li et al. electrodeposited BixSb2-xTey in nitric acid and hydrochloric acid solutions. A composition of Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 was gained in both acid solutions with significantly different morphology. The Bi0.47Sb1.36Te3.17 thin film prepared in the nitric acid solution has the highest Seebeck coefficient of 213 µV/K. The Bi0.22Sb1.48Te3.30 film prepared in the hydrochloric acid solution has the highest power factor of 111.5 µW/(mK2), which had an electrical resistivity of 1.27 × 10–4 Ω m and Seebeck coefficient of 119 µV/K (Li and Wang, 2009).
Diliberto et al. (2008) synthesized Bi2Te3 thin films using pulsed electrodeposition from electrolytes of 20 mM Te(IV) ion and 1 M HNO3. The Bi ion concentration was varied, where increasing Bi concentration in the electrolyte would lead to higher Bi composition. The results also indicated that pulsed electrodeposition would improve the morphology and the electrical conductivity of films compared to direct electrodeposition. The film near stoichiometry (Bi1.93Te3.07) have a Seebeck coefficient of -65 µV/K (Diliberto et al., 2008).
Zhu et al. (2008) synthesized Bi2Te3 thin sheets on Au by electrochemical atomic layer epitaxy method using Bi solution with 0.25 mM Bi(NO3)3 and 0.1 M HClO4, and Te solutions with 0.25 mM TeO2 and 0.1 M HClO4. The bandgap of the Bi2Te3 film was 0.33 eV measured by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Compared to the bulk Bi2Te3 single crystal, the bandgap is blue shifted (Zhu et al., 2008).
Mavrokefalos et al. (2009) reported electrodeposition of n-type Bi2Te3 nanowires (NW). The results showed that monocrystalline NWs have higher electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity than polycrystalline NWs. Additionally, the carrier mobility of the monocrystalline NW is about 2.5 times higher than that of the polycrystalline NW, but it about 19% lower than that of bulk materials. The electron mean-free path was decreased from 61 nm for bulk materials to 40 nm for the 52 nm nanowires, which is owing to electron scattering specularity parameter by nanowire surface is 0.7. Furthermore, the thermal conductivity of the polycrystalline nanowires is lower. The ZT is about 0.1 at 400 K for both monocrystalline and polycrystalline NWs (Mavrokefalos et al., 2009).
Li et al. electrodeposited Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 thin film from nitric acid baths. The results show that electrodeposition mechanism varied with applied potential, where at low applied potential, Te was deposited because of electrochemical reduction of HTeO2+, while at more negative applied potential the reduction reaction of Bi3+ with Te occurred with formation of Bi2Te3. Additionally, when the applied potential is negative enough, formation of Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 compound took place (Köse et al., 2009).
Li et al. examined the electrodeposition of Bi2Te3 in a solution containing TeCl4, Bi(NO3)3 and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) by combining cyclic voltammetry with electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance. The results indicated Te4+ concentrations in and applied potential had an effect on Bi2Te3 composition. Bi2Te3 was electrodeposited in applied potential between −0.2 and −0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl with 10 mM Te4+ and 7.5 mM Bi3+. However, Te-rich Bi2Te3 were electrodeposited at applied potential between -0.2 and -0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl in the solution with 50 mM Te4+ and 37.5 mM Bi3+ (Li, 2009).
Suresh et al. (2009) electrodeposited Bi2Te3 thin films at various pH values in HNO3 solution of Bi (NO3)3 and TeO2. The increase in pH resulted in a decrease in grain size and the film morphology transformed from dispersed nanoparticles to connected chain-like nanostructures as pH was increased. At the temperature between 300 and 425 K, the data showed a four-times increase in Seebeck coefficient between its maximum and minimum value as the solution pH changes from 1 to 3.5, which is attributed to the improved connectivity of the nanostructures at higher pH (Suresh et al., 2009).
Kim and Oh (2009) electrodeposited n-type Bi2Te3 and p-type Sb2Te3 films. The n-type Bi2Te3 had a power factor of 7.1 × 10–4 W/(K2·m) with a Seebeck coefficient of −51.6 μV/K, which was electrodeposited at applied potential of −0.05 V with 25 mM Bi ion and 25 mM Te ion. Additionally, The p-type Sb2Te3 film had a power factor of 1.7 × 10–4 W/(K2·m) with a Seebeck coefficient of 52.1 μV/K, which is deposited at applied potential of 0.02 V in the solution containing 63 mM Sb ion and 7 mM Te ion. (Kim and Oh, 2009).
Mannam et al. (2009) electrodeposited BixTey nanowires from aqueous acidic solutions containing different [Bi3+]/[HTeO2+] (20/20 and 20/10 mM) with 2.5 M HNO3. The nanowires deposited at low applied potentials had a dominant orientation of (110) according to the XRD pattern. In both electrolytes, n-type nanowires were deposited. However, p-type nanowires can be deposited only in the [Bi3+]/[HTeO2+] = 20/10 mM solution. Nanowires formed in the 20/10 mM electrolyte showed at transition from intrinsic to extrinsic. The Seebeck coefficient of -318.7 and 117 μV/K were achieved for n-type and p-type BixTey nanowires, respectively (Mannam et al., 2009).
Kuleshova et al. (2010) electrodeposited BiSbTe films in nitric acid baths. In the electrolyte, sodium ligninsulfonate was added as surfactant, which would improve uniformity of the films as well as the thermoelectric properties. Additionally, the surfactant would also affect the composition of films, where Bi0.32Sb1.33Te3 was deposited in the solution with surfactant and Bi0.35Sb1.33Te3 was deposited without surfactant in the solution with 10 mM HTeO2+, 1 mM Bi3+, 20 mM Sb3+, 1 M HNO3, 0.1 M H3Cit and 50 mM Na3Cit (Kuleshova et al., 2010).
Ma et al. (2010) electrodeposited Bi2Te3 on stainless steel, in which the reaction mechanism and the effect of deposition parameters on composition and morphology were investigated. The CV results showed that onset potential for Bi2Te3 is more positive than Bi and Te deposition. Furthermore, the Te reduction reaction is kinetically hindered with the presence of Bi ions. (Ma et al., 2010).
Kim and Oh (2010a) synthesized p-type SbxTey and n-type BixTey films by electrodeposition. The BixTey film with a thickness of 5.3 µm was electrodeposited in 1 M HNO3 solution at -0.05 V, which contained 50 mM Bi and Te ion. Moreover, the Bi/(Bi + Te) mole ratio is 0.5. The SbxTey film with a thickness of 5.2 µm was electrodeposited at 0.02 V in the electrolyte, where the total concentration of Sb and Te ion is 70 mM and Sb/(Sb + Te) mole ratio is 0.9. The BixTey and SbxTey films have an electrical conductivity of -67 and 63 µV/K(Kim and Oh, 2010a).
Lee et al. (2010) electrodeposited Bi2Te3 nanowires in AAO templates. They claimed the electrical conductivity can be improved from 0.053 to 0.169 × 106 S/m by tailoring the structural properties. Meanwhile, the Seebeck coefficient can be enhanced from 46.6 μV/K to 55 μV/K. As a result, a power factor of 476.3 μW/(K2·m) was achieved (Lee et al., 2010).
Richoux et al. (2010) synthesized p-type (Bi1-xSbx)2Te3 thermoelectric compounds by pulsed electrodeposition in the electrolyte with 1 M HClO4 and 0.1 M tartaric acid. The deposited film had a Seebeck coefficient of 150 μV/K. Additionally, pulsed electrodeposition method can be used to reduce resistivity of the films, where 200 μΩ m was achieved by pulsed electrodeposition method, compared to 5,000 μΩ m by direct-current electrodeposition method (Richoux et al., 2010).
Li et al. electrodeposited BixSb2−xTey film by potentiodynamic electrodeposition technique from mixed dimethyl sulfoxide solution containing Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, TeCl4 and SbCl3. Their results showed that electrodeposition of BixSb2−xTey can be realized in a wide range of applied potential. However, the films deposited at applied potential of -0.2 to -0.4 V achieved the highest S of 185 μV/K and the lowest electrical resistivity of 3.34 × 10–5 Ω m after annealing. Additionally, the deposited nano-crystalline Bi0.49Sb1.53Te2.98 film had a preferred orientation of (015) (Li and Wang, 2010).
Chen et al. (2010) fabricated Te-rich n-type BixTey films and nanowires array with rhombohedral structure (Figure 5) by potentiostatically electrodeposition from nitric baths. The Seebeck coefficient was about -70 µV/K at 300 K and decreased monotonically with temperature. Additionally, thermal conductivity of 0.75 W/(mK) was obtained at 300 K. Aa a result, The ZT Bi2Te3 nanowire was 0.45 at 300 K and 0.9 at 350 K for (Chen et al., 2010).
FIGURE 5. Scanning electron micrographs of AAO template and Bi2Te3 nanowires array: (A) AAO, (B) Top view of Bi2Te3 nanowires array, (C) Side view of Bi2Te3 nanowires array, (D) individual nanowires after dissolving AAO (Chen et al., 2010).
Frantz et al. (2010) also synthesized polycrystalline Bi2Te3 nanowires with rhombohedral phase by electrodeposition using porous polycarbonate as template. Their results showed that dimethyl sulfoxide would help to increase the filling ratio to 80%. Moreover, DMSO in the electrolyte can help to improve the electrical conductivity of the nanowires (Frantz et al., 2010).
Gan et al. (2010) investigated Nanoscale Bi-Te particles with thermoelectric properties electrodeposited on copper substrate in 2.0 M HNO3. The atomic ratio 1:1 for Bi:Te in the alloy, which is equivalent to the weight percentage of Bi:Te = 62%:38% was confirmed from the EDS data (Gan et al., 2010).
Li et al. (2010a) investigated the electrochemical behavior BixSb2-xTey in the solution consisting of 20 mM TeCl4, 20 mM Bi(NO3)3, 20 mM SbCl3, DMSO, and 0.1 mM KNO3. A smooth morphology was obtained for BixSb2-xTey films deposited at different applied potential. The resistances reduced to about 0.04 Ω by post-annealing process. Seebeck coefficient of 85 μV/K was obtained for Bi0.49Sb1.53Te2.98 film (Li et al., 2010a).
Li et al. (2010b) electrodeposited Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 nanowire arrays using AAO as template in the electrolyte composing of 2 mM TeO2, 2.5 mM Bi(NO3)3, 0.3 mM SeO2 and 0.1 M HNO3. The post-annealing process was carried out at 300°C under an argon atmosphere. The single crystalline nanowires with diameter of about 14 nm were obtained (Li et al., 2010b).
Golgovici et al. (2010) synthesized BiSbTe films by electrodeposition in choline chloride (ChCl) and malonic acid based ionic liquids with a molar ratio of 1:1. The reaction temperature was controlled between 80 and 85°C. The concentration of Bi, Sb and Te ions ranged from 1.5 to 50 mM. The CV data showed that the Te reduction reaction happened first, followed by formation of binary or ternary compounds by codeposition. Furthermore, pulsed electrodeposition technique was also used to synthesize BiSbTe films (Golgovici et al., 2010).
Rostek et al. (2011) synthesized n-type Bi2Te3 films by electrochemical deposition. The films with composition near stoichiometric was deposited in the solution containing 20 mM Te ions and 30 mM Bi ions at a current density of 3.75 mA/cm2. The Seebeck coefficient of as-deposited Bi2Te3 films is about -55 μV/K. However, after annealed at 250°C for 60 h, the Seebeck coefficient increased to -130 μV/K(Rostek et al., 2011).
Ma et al. (2011) electrodeposited thin Bi2Te3 film onto stainless steel from acidic nitrate baths. The carrier concentration of the deposited films was ten times higher than the bulk Bi2Te3, while the Seebeck coefficient and Hall mobility is lower than bulk Bi2Te3 (Ma et al., 2011).
Erdogan et al. (2009) synthesized Bi2Te3 nanofilm and nanowire by electrodeposition. The acidic electrolyte containing 1 mM TeO2 and 1 mM Bi(NO3)3 with a pH of 1.5, in which Bi2Te3 nanofilm was deposited with a preferential orientation of (015). Additionally, the alkaline electrolyte containing 2 mM Bi(NO3)3, 1 mM TeO2, and 10 mM EDTA with a pH of 9.0, in which nanowire was deposited with (110) as preferential orientation. They claimed that the EDTA in the basic solution leading to the 2D growth mechanism. Furthermore, the band gap energy of Bi2Te3 nanostructures can be tuned by size and morphology of the nanostructures, as shown in the reflection absorption Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Erdoan and Demir, 2011).
Li et al. (2011a) electrodeposited polycrystalline Bi2Te3 nanowire arrays using AAO templates by a pulse electrodeposition method from a electrolyte containing DMSO. The results showed that the applied potential can be used to tune the composition of the nanowires. The Bi2Te3 nanowire array have a preferential orientation of (110). Additionally, Bi2Te3/Te multilayered nanowires were electrodeposited by the same method (Li et al., 2011a).
Kose et al. (2009) electrodeposited thin Bi2Te3−ySey films in the solution containing 2 mM TeO2, 2.5 mM Bi(NO3)3, 0.3 mM SeO2 and 0.1 M HNO3 on Au (111) at room temperature. Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 films was obtained at applied potential of −0.02 V vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl), which has micron-sized granular crystallites (Köse et al., 2009).
Lim et al. (2009) synthesized BiSbTe films via electrodeposition in the electrolyte containing 0.5 mM Bi3+, 32 mM SbO+, 2 mM HTeO2+, 0.2 M citric acid, 30 mM EDTA and 1 M HNO3. A Seebeck coefficient of 71 µV/K and a power factor 1.2 × 10–4 W/(K2·m) was achieved for BiSbTe films. Additionally, the amorphous Sb2Te3 films was electrodeposited at 0.01–0.03 V in the electrolyte containing 70 mM Bi3+, 70 mM SbO+, 3.5 M perchloric acid and 0.35 M tartaric acid. A Seebeck coefficient of 250 µV/K and a power factor 57 × 10–4 W/(K2·m) was achieved for Sb2Te3 films (Lim et al., 2009).
Kim et al. (2018a) electrodeposited BixSb2-xTey films in the solution with 2.4 mM TeO2, 3.6 mM Sb2O3, 400–1,000 μM Bi(NO3)35H2O, 33 mM L-tartaric acid, and 1 M HNO3 at fixed applied potential of −0.1 V (vs. SCE). The composition of the films were controlled by [Sb]/[Bi] ratio. The results showed that the substitution of Bi with Sb would improve the mobility, while suppress the carrier concentration. The deposited Bi10Sb30Te60 film has a high Seebeck coefficient, which results in a power factor (PF) of ∼490 μW/m K2 (Kim et al., 2018a).
Ma et al. (2010) electrodeposited Bi1-xSbx and Bi2-xSbxTe3 thin films at 25°C with different morphologies, such as thin sheets, rods, dendrites, and spherical particles. The Bi1-xSbx film was deposited in the electrolyte containing 2 mM Bi(NO3)3, 1 mM SbCl3, 0.2 M C4H6O6, and 0.1 M HNO3. Additionally, The Bi2-xSbxTe3 film was deposited in the electrolyte containing 0.3 mM TeO2, 0.2 mM Bi(NO3)3, 1 mM SbCl3, 0.2 M C4H6O6, and 0.1 M HNO3. Furthermore, the results indicated that the underpotential deposition mechanism would lead to the formation of (Bi0.5Sb0.5)2Te3, however the overpotential deposition would result in the formation of Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3. Meanwhile different deposition mechanism can be triggered by applied potential (Ma et al., 2010).
Jin and Wang (2010) electrodeposited n-Type thin Bi2Te3-ySey films using Au, Bi, and Bi2Te3-ySey as substrates. The electrolyte contained 8 mM HTeO2+, 8 mM Bi3+, 1 mM H2SeO3, and 1 M HNO3. The substrates have significant effect on the morphology of films, as well as the crystal orientation. The preferred orientation of (015) with rhombohedral structure was obtained when using Bi2Te3-ySey as substrate. Additionally, the films deposited on the Bi2Te3-ySey substrate showed the highest power factor after annealing (Jin and Wang, 2010).
Golgovici et al. (2011) investigated electrodeposition of Bi2Te3, Sb2Te3, BiSb, and BiSbTe films in an aqueous solution containing 5 M NaCl and 1 M HCl or an ionic liquid with choline chloride and malonic acid mixture. The concentrations of Bi, Sb and Te ion were controlled between 10 and 90 mM. Morphology and composition of BiSbTe was modified by increasing the current pulses (Golgovici et al., 2011).
Liu et al. electrodeposited Bi2Te3 pillars using multi-channel glass molds as template. The results showed that pulsed electrodeposition method is helpful to achieve high aspect ratio filling. The n-type Bi2Te3 arrays with aspect ratio exceeding ten was obtained at a pulse circle of −0.2 V for 4 s, +0.5 V for 1 s, and 0 mV for 3 s (vs. SCE). The precursor concentration in the electrolyte includes 7.5 mM Bi3+ and 10 mM HTeO2+. Furthermore, the electrical conductivity of as-deposited Bi2Te3 pillars is the same magnitude as bulk Bi2Te3 (Liu and Li, 2011).
Li et al. (2011b) synthesized heterogeneous thermoelectric nanowire arrays of multilayer Bi2Te2Se/Te using template direction electrodeposition. The thickness of the Te section can be modulated by tailoring Te ion concentration. The diameter of the heterogeneous nanowires is from 60 to 85 nm. Additionally, the Bi2Te2Se segment can change to Bi2Se2Te by lowing the Te ion concentration to a certain level (Li et al., 2011b).
Pinisetty et al. (2011a) fabricated polycrystalline Bi2Te3 nanowires and nanotubes arrays by electrodeposition. The applied potential had effect on the composition, where both Bi-rich (p-type)and Te-rich (n-type) nanowires or nanotubes can be deposited. The lamellar thickness of bath morphologies were about 17–24 nm. The nanowires and nanotubes had a Seebeck coefficient of 11.5 and 17 μV/K, respectively, which were deposited at −0.4 V. However, when applied potential was −0.065 V, Seebeck coefficient of −48 and −63 μV/K were obtained for the nanowires and nanotubes, respectively (Pinisetty et al., 2011a).
Lim et al. (2012a) synthesized BixSb2-xTe3 films by electrodeposition in an electrolyte containing 0.8 mM TeO2, 0.2 mM Bi(NO3)3, 0.8 mM Sb2O3, 33 mM tartaric acid, and 1 M HNO3. The composition of the thin films can be controlled by applied potential, where stoichiometry can be achieved from −0.10 to −0.15 V vs. SCE. Additionally, at more negative applied potential, the thermoelectric property of BixSb2-xTe3 films was degraded, which might owing to higher defect density. The electrical and thermoelectric properties can be enhanced by annealing in reducing environment (Lim et al., 2012a).
Peranio et al. (2012) synthesized Bi2Te3 nanowires by a potential-pulsed electrodeposition using AAO as template in a solution with 15 mM HTeO2+, 10 mM Bi3+ and 1 M HNO3. The nanowires had a stoichiometric composition with diameters of 50–80 nm and a length of 56 μm. The nanowires are single-crystalline with no grain boundaries. The XRD pattern revealed that growth direction of the nanowires were (110) and (210). Additionally, the c axis of the Bi2Te3 crystal was perpendicular to nanowire axis (Peranio et al., 2012).
Frantz et al. (2012) electrodeposited bismuth telluride nanowires from an electrolyte with1.5 mM Bi3+, 15 mM HTeO2+ and DMSO using polycarbonate as template. The DMSO would shift the reduction potential to more negative side and inhibit the cation diffusion. The nanowires deposited -0.1 V vs Ag/AgCl at have a diameter of 60 nm diameter with stoichiometric composition. The crystal structure of the nanowires was polycrystalline with a preferential orientation perpendicular to the (015) planes (Frantz et al., 2012).
Ma et al. (2012a) synthesized thin Sb2Te3 and Bi2Te3 films using goldthe Au-coated silicon as substrate in an acidic bath with Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, TeO2, Sb2O3, 1 M HNO3 and 0.5 M tartaric acid at room temperature by electrochemical deposition. The as-deposited Bi2Te3 films were polycrystalline, but the Sb2Te3 films were amorphous. Additionally, the Sb2Te3 films showed both Sb2Te3 and Te phase after annealing (Ma et al., 2012a).
Zhu et al. (2008) electrodeposited p-type quaternary thin BiSbTeSe films using Au as substrate in a acidic solution with 0.5 mM Se(IV), 12 mM Te(IV), 2.5 mM Bi(III), 10 mM Sb(III), 0.67 M tartaric acid at room temperature. The thickness of the films was controlled to 8 μm. The applied potential can be used to tailoring the composition of the films. The as-deposited films were amorphous, however they changed to polycrystalline after annealing based on the XRD patterns. A maximum power factor of 620 µW/(K2·m) was achieved for the thin BiSbTeSe films after post-annealing with Seebeck coefficients of 116–133 μV/K (Zhu and Wang, 2012).
Banga et al. (2012) fabricated Bi2Te3/Bi2−xSbxTe3 heterostructure by pulsed potentiostatic electrodeposition method. The solution consisted Na2TeO3, Bi(NO3)3, Sb(III), 2 M nitric acid, and 0.3 M tartaric acid. The heterostructure had a layer periodicity in the range of 10–30 nm. The XRD data showed that the multilayer films possessed a (015) texture (Banga et al., 2012).
Zhu et al. (2008) synthesized n-type Bi2Te3-ySey films using ITO-coated glass as substrates in the acidic solution containing 10.0 mM HTeO2+, 7.5 mM Bi3+, 1.1 mM SeO32- and 0.5 M HNO3 at room temperature by pulsed electrodeposition. The smooth and compact Bi2Te3-ySey films were obtained. Increasing the cathodic current density would decrease the grain size of the films. The Bi2Te3-ySey films had a Seebeck coefficient of about -92 μV/K and electrical resistivity of about 109.4 μΩ m (Zou et al., 2012).
Naylor et al. (2012) synthesized Bi2Te3 films with stoichiometric composition Bi2Te3 in the electrolyte consisting of 10 mM Te(IV), 7.5 mM Bi(III), sodium lignosulfonate (SL) and 1 M HNO3. The sodium lignosulfonate acted as a surfactant, which would improve morphology and roughness of the Bi2Te3 films and achieve better alignment in the (110) plane. The optimal concentration of SL is from 60 to 80 mg/L at a deposition potential of -0.1 V vs SCE (Naylor et al., 2012).
Limmer et al. (2012) reported the electrodeposition of 75 nm diameter nanowire arrays with a composition of Bi2(Te0.95Se0.05)3 onto Si substrates using AAO as template in the electrolyte containing 80 mM Bi(NO3)3•5H2O, 40–80 mM TeCl4, 0.8–1.2 mM SeO2 and 0.1 M KClO4 in dimethyl sulfoxide. The nanowires are polycrystalline with grain size of 5–10 nm (Limmer et al., 2012).
Ma et al. (2012b) synthesized ternary compounds (BixSb1-x)2Te3 and Bi2(Te1-ySey)3 by electrodeposition using gold-coated silicon as substrates in the electrolyte with TeO2, Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, SbCl3 and Na2SeO3, 1 M HNO3 and 0.67 M tartaric acid at room temperature. The p-type (BixSb1-x)2Te3 films had the highest power factor obtained with composition close to Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 deposited at a relatively large negative potential. In addition, Bi2(Te1-ySey)3 thin films showed n-type behaviors with composition close to Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 (Ma et al., 2012b).
Fu et al. (2013) fabricated Ag/Bi2Te3 multilayer nanowires by pulse electrochemical deposition using AAO as the template in the electrolyte consisted of 0.1 M HTeO2+, 75 mM Bi(NO3)3, 10 mM AgNO3, and 1 M HNO3. The deposited the Bi2Te3 had a rhombohedral lattice phase and Ag had a cubic lattice phase. The length of each layer ranged from 25 to 45 nm (Fu et al., 2013).
Nguyen et al. (2012) investigated the electrodeposition of Bi2Te3 film in the electrolyte consisting of 50 mM of 50 mM TeCl4, Bi(NO3)3, 0.5 M lithium nitrate, and ethylene glycol. The results showed that the electrochemical reduction reaction of both Bi3+ and Te4+ ions were carried out at applied potential more negative than 0.2 and 0.55 V vs. SHE, and the reaction is one step without the formation of intermediates. The Bi and Te ions had the similar diffusion coefficients and the reaction rate constants. Bi2Te3 films stoichiometric composition were deposited at current densities up to 5 A/dm2 (Nguyen et al., 2012).
Agapescu et al. (2013) electrodeposited of Bi, Te, and Bi2Te3 films in an ionic liquids consisting of 10 mM BiCl3 and TeO2, choline chloride, and oxalic acid (ChCl–OxA) at 60°C.
Kim and Oh (2013) fabricated a thermoelectric device using n-type Bi2Te3 and p-type Sb2Te3 thin films as basic element legs. The device has a cross-plane configuration with 242 pairs of legs by flip-chip bonding of top electrodes. The thickness of both Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 films were about 20 μm. Additionally, the n-type Bi2Te3 and p-type Sb2Te3 films showed Seebeck coefficients of -59 μV/K and 485 μV/K, respectively. Furthermore, an open-circuit voltage of 0.294 V and a maximum output power of 5.9 μW were achieved at a temperature difference of 22.3 K (Kim and Oh, 2013).
Manzano et al. (2013) electrodeposited Bi2Te3 films with preferentially oriented of (110) direction in the electrolyte containing 10 mM HTeO2+, 7.5 mM Bi3+ and 1 M HNO3 at applied potential of 0.02 V vs. Ag/AgCl on a Pt substrate. When using pulsed electrodeposition method, the results indicated that at a pulse of on-time = off-time = 0.1 s the films achieved a Seebeck coefficient of −72 μV/K and power factor of 440 μW/(K2·m), which is measured at 107°C. Additionally, when using potentiostatic method, a Seebeck coefficient of -73 μV/K at 107°C and power factor of 600 μW/(K2·m) was obtained at 107°C (Manzano et al., 2013).
Zhou et al. (2013) electrodeposited n-type phosphorus-doped Bi2Te3 films on a stainless-steel electrode in the solution containing 10 mM TeO2, 8 mM Bi(NO3)3, 4 mM H3PO4 and 1 M HNO3. The as-prepared films had the thermal conductivity of 0.47 W/(mK) and the electrical conductivity of 280 S/cm (Zhou et al., 2013).
Rashid et al. (2013) synthesized Bi2Te3 films by galvanostatic electrodeposition in a solution containing 8 mM HTeO2+, 8 mM Bi3+ and 1 M nitric acid. The results indicated that annealing process would enhance the carrier mobility while suppressing the carrier concentration. Additionally, the Seebeck coefficient can be enhanced from -57 to -169.49 µV/K and the power factor can be enhanced from 2.74 to 1737 µW/(K2·m) by post annealing process for p-type Bi2Te3 film. Moreover, the Seebeck coefficient can be improved from 28 to 112.3 µV/K and the power factor can be improved from 2.57 to 443 µW/(K2·m) by post-annealing process (Rashid et al., 2013).
Cao et al. (2013) fabricated thin Bi2Te3 films by electrodeposition in the solution with 10 mM HTeO2+, 8 mM Bi3+ and 1 M HNO3 at room temperature. The substrates used during the deposition had an epitaxial seed layer, which would help to reduce the lattice mismatch between Bi2Te3 and Silicon. Moreover, more uniform structure and better crystallinity can be achieved. Both doped and intrinsic silicon were used as substrate, while the results showed that a more compact thin Bi2Te3 film with preferential orientation of (001) was obtained for intrinsic silicon, which also showed better thermoelectric performance and smoother surface morphology. Compared to the thin film with preferential orientation of (110), the electrical conductivity is about 72% higher and the power factors is about 45% higher. Additionally, the electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient was suppressed by reducing the seed layer thickness from 40 to 20 nm, which can be attributed to the insufficient charge transfer during electrodeposition (Cao et al., 2013).
Wu et al. (2013) investigated the effect of chloride on the electrodeposition of Bi2Te3 films in the solution containing TeCl4, Bi(NO3)3·5H2O and ethylene glycol. The results indicated that the presence of chloride could enhance the reduction reaction rate of Te significantly, where the reaction rate with chloride in the solution is three orders of magnitude higher than the rate without chloride. Additionally, Bi2Te3 films with stoichiometric composition and smooth morphology were electrodeposited in certain potential window. A Seebeck coefficient of -120 µV/K was achieved for the Bi2Te3 films (Wu et al., 2013).
Yoo et al. (2013a) electrodeposited BixTey thin films from nitric acid baths with 2.5–10 mM Bi(NO3)3, 10 mM TeO2, and 1.5 M HNO3 using Au/Ni/Si as substrates. The films with surface morphologies of granular and needle-like structures were deposited at different Te content. Higher of Bi ions concentration in electrolytes would result in higher power factor. Additionally, the power factor was not improved significantly owing to the interdependence of the electrical conductivity and the Seebeck coefficient (Yoo et al., 2013a).
Wang et al. (2013) synthesized Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 and Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 by electrodeposition combined with post annealing. The solution to electrodeposit n-type Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 contained 8 mM HTeO2+, 8 mM Bi3+, 1 mM H2SeO3 and 1 M HNO3, while the electrolyte to electrodeposit p-type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 contained 2 mM Bi3+, 10 mM HTeO2+, 100 mM Sb(III) and 1 M HNO3. The as-deposited films possess amorphous structure and can be transferred to nanocrystalline after annealing. The annealed films show a preferred orientation of (015). The maximum power output of 77 μW was achieved with open-circuit voltage of 660 mV with a temperature difference of 20 K at 25°C. Additionally, a power density of 770 μW/cm3 was obtained (Wang et al., 2013).
Rashid et al. (2013) synthesized n-type Bi2Te3 films with a prominent orientation of (110) in the acidic solution with TeO2 and Bi(NO3)3 on gold electrode. The Bi2Te3 films are nanocrystalline with grain size ranged from 21 to 45 nm. The results showed that the electrodes distance could be used to tune electrical and thermoelectric properties of the films, thus improving carrier charge mobility without varying of the Seebeck coefficient and carrier concentration. The highest power factor of 820 μW/K2·m was achieved with an electrical conductivity of 2.13 × 103 S/cm and Seebeck coefficient of -61.2 μV/K (Rashid and Chung, 2013).
Yoo et al. (2013b) synthesized BixSb2-xTe3 films use potentiostatic electrodeposition method at room temperature in an acidic electrolyte containing 0.8 mM TeO2, 0.2 mM Bi(NO3)3, 0.8 mM Sb2O3, 1 M HNO3, and 33 mM tartaric acid. When the applied potential was controlled between -0.10 and -0.15 V versus SCE, thin films with composition near stoichiometric were deposited. Additionally, reducing the applied potentials would result in suppressing the electrical and thermoelectric properties, probably owing to higher defect density (Yoo et al., 2013b).
Ng et al. (2014) fabricated the binary Bi2Te3 and ternary BiSbTe nanowires using template (AAO) directed electrodeposition method in a solution compose of 10 mM TeO2, 20 mM Bi(NO3)3·5H2O and 1 M HNO3,. The results showed that reducing the applied potentials can increase the Sb composition, while increasing the applied potentials would facilitate the formation of Bi2Te3 (Ng et al., 2014).
Zou et al. (2014) investigated electrodeposition of n-type Bi2Te3-ySey film in the solution containing 10.0 mM HTeO2+, 1.1 mM SeO32-, 7.5 mM Bi3+, and 1 M HNO3 at room temperature. The nucleation and growth mechanism were examined. The electrochemical reaction rate was controlled by diffusion and irreversible with the limiting current density of 1.78 mA/cm2. A flocculent film was deposited when the applied potential was larger than limiting current without agitation. However, Bi2Te3-ySey film with smooth morphology was deposited at 4 mA/cm2 with agitation. Bi2Te3-ySey film deposited at 1 mA/cm2 have relatively high power factor and electrical conductivity (Zou et al., 2014).
Maas et al. (2014) electrodeposited Bi2Te3 in acidic solution with 20 mM HTeO2+ and 20 mM Bi3+. The anode is Bi2Te3 as a sacrificial the source of cations. A homogeneous Bi2Te3 film with a thickness of 300 µm was deposited using Bi2Te3 as anode, while without Bi2Te3 as anode the thickness can be obtained is 10 times thinner. A power factor of 500 µW/(K2·m) was achieved (Maas et al., 2014).
Szymczak et al. (2014) electrodeposited n-type Bi2Te3 films in an ionic liquid with 1-ethyl-1-octyl-piperidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (EOPipTFSI) and 1-ethyl-1-octyl- piperidinium bromide (EOPipBr). The atomic ratio of EOPipTFSI and EOPipBr is 95:5. According to the result, this ionic liquid is stable at high cathodic applied potential, which provide a larger window to deposited Bi2Te3 compound. The morphology of the Bi2Te3 film can be tuned by precursor concentration, in which mirror-like films can be deposited with good uniformity. Additionally, an electrical resistivity of 133 µΩ m and Seebeck coefficient of -70 µV/K were achived (Szymczak et al., 2014).
Jiang et al. (2014) fabricated Bi2Te3/PEDOT:PSS/Bi2Te3 composite film by electrodeposition of Bi2Te3 onto poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly (styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) film. The solution contained TeO2, Bi(NO3)3, and 1 M HNO3. A thermal conductivity of 0.169–0.179 W/(mK) was obtained. ZT value of 1.72 × 10–2 was achieved for Bi2Te3/PEDOT:PSS/Bi2Te3 composite film with electrical conductivity of 403.5 S/cm (Jiang et al., 2014).
Caballero-Calero et al. (2014) electrodeposited Bi2Te3 films in a solution with 10 mM HTeO2+, 7.5 mM Bi3+, 1 M HNO3. The Bi2Te3 films have a preferred orientation of (110) with c-axis parallel the substrate. Additionally, the effect of sodium lignosulfonate as surfactant on morphology was examined. Seebeck coefficient was determined to be -80 ± 6 µV/K (Caballero-Calero et al., 2014).
Wu et al. (2014) electrodeposited SbBi, Sb2Te3, and BiSbTe alloys in the electrolyte containing TeCl4, SbCl3, Bi(NO3)3, and ethylene glycol. The electrochemical reaction mechanism of Sb in chloride-free ethylene glycol was investigated. The results showed that the diffusion coefficients of Sb(III), Te(IV) and Bi(III) were comparable in ethylene glycol. Additionally, the onset potential of Sb is more negative than that of Te. During the electrodeposition of BiSbTe alloys, BiTe was deposited first followed by increase of Sb composition at more negative applied potential. (Wu et al., 2014).
Patil et al. (2015) electrodeposited fern shaped Bi2Te3 thin film in the solution containing 10 mM Te(IV), 7 mM Bi(NO3)3, and 1 M HNO3.
Matsuoka et al. (2015) electrodeposited Bi2Te3/Bi2Se3 multiplayer heterostructure in two baths sequentially. The layer thickness was fixed to about 1 µm and the number of layers were varied from 2 to 10. The deposited multilayer structure is n-type with nanocrystalline. The boundaries between different layers were not clear planar. The number of the layers had a dramatic effect on the electrical conductivity, where more layers resulted in higher electrical conductivity, while Seebeck coefficient remained unchanged. The 10-layer Bi2Te3/Bi2Se3 heterostructure has a power factor of 144 µW/(K2∙m), which is about 3 times higher than that of the 2-layer heterostructure (Matsuoka et al., 2015).
Caballero-Calero et al. (2015) electrodeposited Bi2Te3-ySey films in a conventional three electrode cell in the solution containing 9 mM HTeO2+, 7.5 mM Bi3+, 1 mM H2SeO3, and 1 M HNO3. The influence of additives (i.e., sodium signosulfonate (SLS) and EDTA) in morphology, stoichiometry, structure and Seebeck coefficient was studied. The films synthesized with SLS had high crystallographic orientation and better morphology, while films deposited in the presence of EDTA had higher content of bismuth. The combination of both additives would improve the quality of stoichiometric Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 films, namely denser morphology, higher orientation and higher Seebeck coefficients (60% larger) when compared with films deposited without additives. (Caballero-Calero et al., 2015).
Zhou et al. (2015) synthesized Bi2Te3 thin films by the pulsed electrodeposition method in the solution consisting of 40 mM HTeO2+, 30 mM Bi3+ and 1.7 M HNO3. The effect of deposition parameters on the composition and microstructure was investigated. The results indicated that the stoichiometry and morphology can be improved by a large pulse off-to-on ratio with a pulsed applied potential of 0 mV vs. Ag/AgCl. Additionally, larger pulse off-to-on ratio would enhance the ZT of Bi2Te3 films owing to suppressing the thermal conductivity and improving the Seebeck coefficient. The highest ZT value was 0.16 obtained at a pulse off-to-on ratio of 50 (Zhou et al., 2015).
Li et al. (2015) reported the electrodeposition of BiSbTe nanowires in the electrolyte containing 15 mM HTeO2+, 40 mM SbO+, 2 mM Bi3+, 0.3 M tartaric acid and 1 M HNO3. Their data showed that the pulse electrodeposit method would help to improve the uniformity and crystallinity of Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 nanowires, which resulted in higher electrical and thermal conductivity, compared to the direct current deposited nanowires. Additionally, the pulse electrodeposit method would also enhance the Seebeck coefficient of nanowires, which was attributed to a more homogeneous distribution of the elements. The highest ZT value was 1.14 at 330 K achieve by pulse-deposited Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 nanowires (Li et al., 2015).
Song et al. (2015) synthesized thin Bi2Te3 films in a acidic bath with 7.5 mM Bi(NO3)3, 10 mM TeO2, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and 1.5 M HNO3 at room temperature. CTAB acted as a surfactant. The results indicated that the presence of CTAB would help to improve the surface morphology and mechanical properties Bi2Te3 films. However, the electrical and thermoelectric properties were preserved (Song et al., 2015).
Uda et al. (2015) fabricated Bi2Te3 thermoelectric micro-device by electrodeposition in an electrolyte composing of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, TeO2, and HNO3. The size effect of electrode was examined. The cross-section of the TE units is 50 × 50 μm2 with depth of 20 µm. Additionally, the device had a eight arrays, which composed of 110 TE units. A maximum power output of 0.96 µW was achieved with an open-circuit voltage of 17.6 mV (Uda et al., 2015).
Chang et al. (2015) examined the electrodeposition of individual n-type Bi2Te3 nanowires (NWs) using polycarbonate membranes (PCM) as templates in the solution 10 mM HTeO2+, 15 mM Bi3+, 1 M HNO3 and 50 v/v % DMSO. The electrodeposition conditions, such as the applied potential can be used to control the composition of Bi2Te3. Additionally, increase the Te composition would increase the average grain size of NWs, as well as the electrical conductivity. The maximum power factor of 195.8 µW/(mK2) was achieved at 300 K for the Te-rich NW with diameter of 162 nm (Chang et al., 2015).
Shin and Oh (2015) fabricated a thermoelectric device based on thin film by combining electrodeposition and the flip-chip process. The thermoelectric materials used in the device are the n-type Bi2Te3 and p-type Sb2Te3 thin film, which is deposited on Ti/Cu/Au substrate in the solutions with 25 mM Bi ion, 25 mM Te ion and 1 M HNO3 for Bi2Te3 and 63 mM Sb ion, 7 mM Te ion. The device with 242 pairs thermoelectric legs have a internal resistance of 21.4 Ω, which have a output voltage of 320 mV and output power of 1.1 mW at 39.7 K temperature difference. Additionally, the calculated power density of 3.84 mW/cm2 (Shin and Oh, 2015).
Abellán et al. (2015) synthesized thin Bi2Te3 films containing TeCl4, Bi(NO3)3 and dimethyl sulfoxide. Different substrates were used, such as CdTe/FTO and SnO2:F coated glasses. Additionally, the deposits films were n-type semiconductors with trigonal crystal structure and stoichiometric composition dimethyl sulfoxide (Abellán et al., 2015).
Kulsi et al. (2015) synthesized thin Bi2Te3 films with preferred crystal orientation of (018) in the solution consisting of 15 mM TeO2 and 10 mM Bi (NO3)3. The effect of different surfactant on the morphology was examined, including sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). The results indicated that improving the surface morphology would help to enhancing the carrier mobility. A ZT value of 0.28 was achieved using SDS as surfactant, which was measured at room temperature (Kulsi et al., 2015).
Şişman and Başoğlu (2016) fabricated thin Bi2Te3-ySey films by electrodeposition in the solution containing 2 mM TeO2, 2.5 mM Bi(NO3)3, SeO2 and 0.1 M HNO3 with Au as substrate. The Se composition was controlled to be 0.3 to 2.5. The results showed that replacement of Te by Se atoms would push the XRD diffraction peaks positions Bi2Te3-ySey to higher angle, which is attributed to the change of crystal lattice constant (Şişman and Başoğlu, 2016).
Lei et al. (2016a) synthesized of 600 μm-thick n-type Bi2Te3 films by pulsed and potentiostatic electrodeposition in the electrolyte consisting of 70 mM TeO2, 52.5 mM Bi3+, 2 M nitric acid and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). The results indicated that compact and uniform Bi2Te3 films was electrodeposited which composition near stoichiometric and hexagonal crystal structure. Moreover, the film growth can reach 100 μm/h. Additionally, a Seebeck coefficient of -200 µV/K and an electrical conductivity of 400 S/cm were achieved, resulting in a power factor of 1.6 × 103 µW/(mK2) (Lei et al., 2016a).
Yang et al. (2016) electrodeposited p-type BiSbTe thin films using ITO glasses as substrate in the electrolyte composing of 2 mM TeO2, 0.5 mM Bi2O3, 3.5 M HClO4, 1 M HNO3 and 0.35 M C4H6O6. The Sb3+ concentration and current density were the variables during the electrodeposition. Thin BiSbTe films showed different morphologies, such as ball-type, mixed-type and acicular-type. The Seebeck coefficient of 32.89 μV/K was obtained (Yang et al., 2016).
Patil et al. (2016) electrodeposited thin Bi2Te3 film in a solution with 10 mM Te(IV), 7 mM Bi(NO3)3·5H2O and 1 M HNO3. The XRD pattern showed that the Bi2Te3 film was nanocrystalline with grain size of 18.08 nm and had a preferred orientation of (015) with rhombohedral crystal structure (Patil et al., 2016).
Na et al. (2016) electrodeposited n-type Bi2Te3 films in the electrolyte with 10 mM HTeO2+, 8 mM Bi3+ and 1 M HNO3 on a flexible substrate. The effect of applied potential on the crystal structure and thermoelectric properties were systematically studied. The Bi2Te3 film with preferred orientation of (110) is deposited. The highest power factor of 1,473 μW/(K2·m) was achieved for the film electrodeposited at applied potential of 0.02 V with electrical conductivity of 691 S/cm. The effect of applied potential and grain size on the electrical and thermoelectric properties were shown in Figure 6. A flexible thermoelectric device was fabricated using Bi2Te3 as n-type material and poly (3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene)s as p-type material. The generator achieved a output voltage of 5 mV and output power of 56 nW with temperature difference of 12 K (Na et al., 2016).
FIGURE 6. (A) Corelation of electrical conductivity (black circle), Seebeck coefficient (red circle), and power factor (blue circle) with different applied potentials (V vs Ag/AgCl) (B) Corelation of the electrical conductivity (black), Seebeck coefficient (red), and power factor (blue) with (110) crystallite size (Na et al., 2016).
Lal et al. (2017) synthesized p-type (BixSb1-x)2Te3 thin films using pulsed electrodeposition in the electrolyte consisting of 15 mM HTeO2+, 5 mM Sb2O3, 5 mM Bi(NO3)3, 0.2 M tartaric acid, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and dimethyl sulfoxide. The results indicated that the present of SDS would improve the Seebeck coefficient and power factor of the films as shown in Figure 7. (Lal et al., 2017).
FIGURE 7. Electrical resistivity (square), Seebeck coefficient (triangle), and power factor (circle) of annealed films deposited with different concentrations of SDS (Lal et al., 2017).
Additionally, many other groups reported the results of characterization of BiTe/Se electrodeposits based on various experimental conditions which are summarized on Table 1. (Jagadish et al., 2015; Lei et al., 2016b; Wu et al., 2016b; Hasan et al., 2016; Kulsi et al., 2016; Manzano et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017b; Kang et al., 2017; Lal et al., 2017; Lei et al., 2017).
Electrodeposition of BixSby Based Materials
Dou et al. (2008) synthesize Bi/BiSb superlattice nanowires by template-directed electrodeposition method, in which AAO was used as template. The electrolyte for electrodeposition contains a mixture of 80 mM SbCl3, 40 mM BiCl3, 50 g/L citric acid, 40 g/L tartaric acid, 70 g/L NaCl, 100 g/L glycerol and 1.0 M HCl at pH value of 0.82 (Dou et al., 2008).
Weber et al. (2008) electrodeposited high density nanowire arrays in AAO templates from the electrolyte of 50 mM Bi3+ + 50 mM Sb3+ in dimethyl sulfoxide.
Dou et al. (2009) synthesized Bi/BiSb multilayer nanowires by pulsed electrodeposition with small bilayer thickness. The electrolyte for the deposition contained a mixture of 80 mM SbCl3, 40 mM BiCl3, 0.24 M citric acid, 0.27 M tartaric acid, 1.2 M NaCl, 0.1 M glycerol and 1.0 M HCl. Additionally, the modulating time was used to control the segment length and layer thickness of the nanowires (Dou et al., 2009).
Muller et al. (2012) synthesized Bi1−xSbx nanowires with Sb composition in the range from 0.05 to 0.40 and diameter in the range from 20 to 100 nm. The results showed that applied potential and ratio of Bi/Sb ions would influence the composition of Bi1−xSbx nanowires (Müller et al., 2012).
Limmer et al. (2015) electrodeposited BixSby in the non-aqueous baths consisting of Sb salts, Bi(NO3)3·5H2O, dimethyl sulfoxide and KClO4. The effect of different Sb salts on the crystalline quality and preferred orientations were investigated. The results showed that nanowire arrays synthesized with SbI3-based bath were polycrystalline. However, nanowire arrays synthesized with SbCl3-based bath have a trigonal orientation, and composition of these nanowires remained constant along the nanowires. Additionally, there was a composition gradient along the radius of the nanowires array, where nanowires of Bi0.75Sb0.25 were obtained in the center area and nanowires of Bi0.70Sb0.30 were obtained in the edge region (Limmer et al., 2015).
Electrodeposition of Bi2Se3 Based Materials
Xiao et al. (2009) electrodeposited thin Bi2Se3 films using Pt as substrate by atomic layer epitaxy. The electrochemical reaction mechanism of Bi and Se alone were investigated by cyclic voltammetry. The electrodeposition mechanism Bi2Se3 is underpotential deposition (UPD). The synthesized Bi2Se3 films had an orthorhombic structure with stoichiometric composition. Additionally, the bandgap of Bi2Se3 films the was 0.35 eV. (Xiao et al., 2009).
Li et al. (2010c) synthesized Bi2Se3 thin films by electrodeposition in the solution containing SeO2, Bi(NO3)3, and HNO3 using Ti and indium tin oxide-coated glass as substrates at room temperature. The results indicated that the substrate had dramatic effect on the crystal structure of Bi2Se3 thin films. Pure rhombohedral crystal structure was obtained on the indium tin oxide-coated glass substrate, while both rhombohedral and orthorhombic crystal structure was obtained on Ti (Li et al., 2010c).
Xue et al. (2014) fabricated Bi2Se3/Bi multilayered nanowire arrays by pulsed electrodeposition using AAO as template in the electrolyte with 7.5 mM H2SeO3, 25 mM Bi3+ and 7 mM HNO3. Each layer of Bi or Bi2Se3 had a thickness of about 100 nm, and the total length of the nanowire was 10 µm with a diameter of 50 nm (Xue et al., 2014).
Li et al. electrodeposited thick Bi2Se3 films using ITO-coated glass as substrate in a acidic solution containing 25 mM SeO2, 25 mM Bi(NO3)3 and 1.3 M HNO3. The results showed that the as-deposited films were p-type Bi2Se3 films. The power factors of 52.57 μW/mK2 were obtained for the as-deposited films (Xiaolong and Zhen, 2014).
Tumelero et al. (2016) electrodeposited Bi2Se3 using Si (100) substrate as substrate in the electrolyte consisting of 1.5 mM SeO2, 1 mM Bi(NO3)3 and 0.5 M nitric acid. The results indicated that Bi2Se3 with single orthorhombic phase and stoichiometric composition can be deposited by tuning the applied potential, while the potential window was narrow. Additionally, the deposited Bi2Se3 had a bandgap of 1.25 eV (Tumelero et al., 2016).
Souza et al. (2017) synthesized Bi2Se3 films by potentiostatic electrodeposition method in the electrolyte consisting of 1.5 mM SeO2, 0.5 mM Bi2O3 and 1.0 M HClO4 using silicon (100) as substrate. The deposited Bi2Se3 films is compact with uniform and smooth morphology. The as-deposited films had a dominant orthorhombic phase with mixture of rhombohedral and amorphous phases. However, pure rhombohedral structure was obtained after annealing (Souza et al., 2017).
Electrodeposition of Bi2S3 Based Materials
Jagadish et al. (2016) synthesized n-type Bi2S3 films in the solution consisting of 20.6 mM Bi(NO3)3, 0.54 M of lactic acid, 0.78 M of nitric acid and 140.8 mM Na2SO4. Virgin carbon fiber and recycled carbon fiber were used as substrates. The deposited Bi2S3 had a composition near stoichiometry. The surface morphology and the Seebeck coefficient of Bi2S3 films can be tuned by post annealing process. The Bi2S3 films had Seebeck coefficient of -16.3 and -12.4 µV/K deposited on virgin carbon fiber and recycled carbon fiber, respectively (Jagadish et al., 2016).
Electrodeposition of Sb2Te3 Based Materials
Ueda et al. (2008) synthesized Sb2Te3 alloy in the AlCl3-NaCl-KCl molten salt electrolyte containing 10 mM TeCl4 and 7 mM SbCl3, at the temperature of 423 K and applied potential of 0.85 V vs. Al/Al(III). The composition of Sb can be controlled by concentration ratio of the Sb(III) to [Sb(III) + Te(IV)]. The morphology of deposited Sb2Te3 alloy is disk-like granule, which had a size of around 10 µm (Ueda et al., 2008).
Park et al. (2009) electrodeposited thin SbxTey films and nanowires at room temperature in an acidic electrolyte. Pt/Si and Au were used as substrate. The applied voltage and film thickness had significant effect on the morphology and grain size of the SbxTey films. Amorphous SbxTey films was electrodeposited, while the films became the rhombohedral R3m structure after annealing (Park et al., 2009).
Kim and Oh (2010b) investigated the crystallization behavior of the electrodeposited Sb2Te3 film in the electrolyte containing 7 mM Te ion, 63 mM Sb ion, 3.5 M perchloric acid, 0.35 M tartaric acid. The transition crystal structure from amorphous to crystalline would influence the Seebeck coefficient. Moreover, the addition of Cu can improve the thermal stability of the Sb2Te3 film, where CuSbTe film had a crystallization temperature of 149.5°C (Kim and Oh, 2010b).
Pinisetty et al. (2011b) electrodeposited polycrystalline Sb2Te3 nanowires and nanotubes arrays in the electrolyte consisting of 0.7 mM TeO2, 1.6 mM Sb2O3, 33 or 330 mM tartaric acid, and 3 M HNO3. The nanowires and nanotube had an average lamellar thickness of 36 and 43 nm, respectively (Pinisetty et al., 2011b).
Lim et al. (2011) electrodeposited p-tyape SbxTey thin films in an acidic solutions. The effect of TeO2 concentrations was investigated. Sb2Te3 films with composition near stoichiometry was deposited with a rhombohedral structure and preferred orientation of (015). The films had a carrier concentration of 5.8 × 1018 cm−3 and mobility of 54.8 cm2/(Vs). Additionally, more negative applied potential would reduce the carrier concentration and mobility, which is possibly owing to increase in defects. A Seebeck coefficient of 118 μV/K was obtained at room temperature for the as-deposited Sb2Te3 film (Lim et al., 2011).
Qiu et al. (2011) synthesized Sb2Tex (2 < × < 6) films in the alkaline solution with TeO32-, SbO2−, diaminourea polymer and triethanolamine. The solution was pretreated by argon gas to fully deaerate, which would enhance the Seebeck coefficient of the films by reducing oxygen contamination in the deposited films. The Sb2Tex films were amorphous before annealing. A maximum power factor 1.58 mW/mK2 was achieved with a Seebeck coefficient of 532 μV/K after annealing (Qiu et al., 2011).
Schumacher et al. (2012) electrodeposited Sb2Te3 films in the electrolyte composing of 10 mM TeO2, 5.6 mM Sb2O3, 0.84 M tartaric acid and 1 M nitric acid with pH of 1. Both Au and stainless steel were used as substrates. The results showed that morphology and composition of the films could be improved by pulsed electrodeposition methods. The p-type Sb2Te3 films fabricated by pulsed electrodeposition methods achieved a power factors of about 700 μW/(mK2) at room temperature with the electrical conductivity of 280 S/cm and Seebeck coefficients of 160 μV/K. Additionally, a maximum power factors obtained is 852 μW/(mK2) after annealing (Schumacher et al., 2012).
Li et al. (2012) electrodeposited SbxTey films in a nonaqueous electrolyte containing 20 mM SbCl3, 20 mM TeCl4 and 0.1 M KNO3. The SbxTey films had a smooth morphology, which is independent of applied potential. The composition obtained nearest to stoichiometry is Sb1.87Te3.13. Additionally, all the films were p-type after annealing (Li et al., 2012).
Lim et al. (2012b) synthesized SbxTey films in the electrolyte with 2.4 mM HTeO2+, 0.8 mM SbO+, 33 mM tartaric acid, and 1 M HNO3 by electrodeposition. The thin Sb2Te3 films with composition near stoichiometry were deposited in the applied potential range of -0.15 to -0.30 V vs. SCE. The post-annealing process would reduce the FWHM of the major diffraction peaks and enhance the electrical conductivity. Additionally, the power factor was improved from 44.2 to 372.1 mW/(mK2) by annealing (Lim et al., 2012b).
Lensch-Falk et al. (2012) electrodeposited thin Sb2Te3 films in the electrolyte consisting of 7 mM sodium tellurite (IV), 16 mM antimony (III) oxide, 0.3 M tartaric acid, and 2 M nitric acid at room temperature by pulsed electrodeposition method. The results showed that the pulse duration have a significant effect on the texture and microstructure of films, where lamellar microstructure was deposited at short pulse durations, while equiaxed and randomly oriented microstructure was deposited at relative long pulse durations. Additionally, reducing pulse duration would also help to suppress the thermal conductivity of the films, where thermal conductivity of less than 2 W/(Km) was obtained (Lensch-Falk et al., 2012).
Nguyen et al. (2013) fabricated Sb, Te and SbxTey from molten salts containing acetamide - antimony chloride and tellurium chloride by electrodeposition. The Te composition of SbxTey alloy films is ranged from 20 to 81 at%, which is obtained in the electrolyte with SbCl3 up to 0.48 M and TeCl4 up to 0.12 M (Nguyen et al., 2013).
Yoo et al. (2013c) synthesized Sb2Te3 films in the solution consisting of 2.4 mM TeO2, 0.8 mM Sb2O3, 33 mM tartaric acid, and 1 M HNO3 at room temperature. Additionally, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was used as surfactant to improve the surface morphology, where the effect of CTAB on the morphology of Sb2Te3 films was shown in Figure 8. Moreover, CTAB would also help to enhance the adhesion of Sb2Te3 films to substrate. Post-annealing at 200°C can improve electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient of the Sb2Te3 films, which was attributed to Te nanodots formation within the Sb2Te3 crystal structure. A power factor of 716.0 mW/mK2 was obtained for Sb2Te3 films with 10–20 nm Te nanodots (Yoo et al., 2013c).
FIGURE 8. Comparison of the top view (scale bar = 30 µm) and the cross-sectional (scale bar = 20 µm) SEM images of the Sb2Te3 films electrodeposited with and without CTAB (Yoo et al., 2013c).
Kim et al. (2015) synthesized Te-rich Sb2Te3 film in a solution with 3.6 mM Sb2O3, 2.4 mM TeO2, 33 mM L-tartaric acid, 1 M HNO3. The as deposited films were amorphous, while γ-SbTe embedded nanocrystalline Sb2Te3 film was obtained by post annealing process because of solid-state phase transition. The results indicated that γ-SbTe embedded Sb2Te3 had higher Seebeck coefficient and P.F. than single phase Sb2Te3 film. This was attributed to strong energy-dependent charge scattering, which is confirmed by UPS analysis showing 90 meV valence band difference between Sb2Te3 and γ-SbTe nanocrystalline. As a consequence, a Seebeck coefficient of 320 μV/K was obtained for γ-SbTe/Sb2Te3 nanocomposite (Kim et al., 2015).
Kim et al. (2018b) also electrodeposited Ag2Te nanoprecipitates embedded p-type Sb2Te3 films (Figure 9). The same electrolyte condition and applied potential (0.1 vs. SCE) was applied to deposit the films except adding 100 μM AgNO3 as Ag sources. The results indicated that the presence of the β-Ag2Te phase would improve the Electrical property Sb2Te3 films dramatically, which was attributed to energy-dependent charge carrier filtering effect at the β-Ag2Te/Sb2Te3 interface. Additionally, density of states effective mass (m*∼1.8 m0) increased, leading to a high power factor of 1870 mW/mK2 at 300 K without any dramatic suppression of electrical conductivity (Kim et al., 2018b).
FIGURE 9. Microstructure of the precipitated Ag2Te phase embedded in Sb2Te3 film. (A) HRTEM image and (B) a lattice image showing the precipitated Ag2Te nanodots within the Sb2Te3 matrix. (C) HRTEM image taken at a (Nolas et al., 2001; Snyder and Ursell, 2003; Hsu et al., 2004; Zide et al., 2006; Zeng et al., 2007; Faleev and Léonard, 2008; Poudel et al., 2008; Snyder and Toberer, 2008; Sootsman et al., 2009; Ko et al., 2011; Szczech et al., 2011; Zebarjadi et al., 2012) zone axis and (D) the corresponding FFT image (Kim et al., 2018b).
Catrangiu et al. (2016) electrodeposited Sb2Te3 film in the ionic liquid with 4–10 mM TeO2, 4–10 mM SbCl3, choline chloride and oxalic acid. The composition of the films can be controlled by precursor concentration and applied potential. The electrodeposited mechanism is that Te layer was deposited followed by the deposition of SbxTey compounds at more negative applied potential (Catrangiu et al., 2016).
Hatsuta et al. (2016) synthesized Sb2Te3 thin films in the solution consisting of 1.6 mM TeO2, 1.3 mM SbF3, and 0.39 M HCl by electrodeposition using stainless steel as substrate. The results indicated that a stoichiometric atomic composition was achieved for the as-deposited thin film. Moreover, the composition of thin film kept at stoichiometry after annealed at the temperature below 250°C. However, when the annealing temperature go up to 300°C, a portion a of alien element, including Fe, Cr, Ni, was detected in the film, which lead to lower Seebeck coefficient and higher electrical conductivity. As a consequence, a maximum power factor of 13.6 µW/(cmK2) was obtained for the Sb2Te3 film (Hatsuta et al., 2016).
Kim et al. (2016) electrodeposited thin AgSbTe2 films. The deposited amorphous Ag15Sb27Te58 film showed a Seebeck coefficient of 1,270 µV/K. The carrier concentration of about 1016 to 1019 cm−3 was obtained. For deposited nanocrystalline film, The power factors of 90–553 mW/mK2 was obtained owing to higher Hall mobility and Seebeck coefficients (Kim et al., 2016).
Conclusion
Electrochemical deposition is a cost effective and manufacturable synthesis method, which can be used to deposit thermoelectric materials with controlled morphology, composition and crystal structures. The electrodeposition baths including aqueous solution (e.g., acidic and alkaline solutions), ionic liquid, deep eutectic solvents solutions were used to deposit TE materials. Most of the papers investigated the electrodeposition mechanism and kinetics, and the control of morphology, composition and crystal structure of the deposits by electrodeposition parameters, such as precursor concentration, solution pH in aqueous solution, agitation, additives, temperature, applied potential/current, substrate and so on. The correlation between electrodeposition parameters and TE properties was reported, which is indirect correlation because the material properties (e.g., morphology, composition and crystal structure) are the direct effects on the TE properties. The correlation between material properties and TE properties was also discussed by various groups.
Thermoelectric micro-devices have a great potential to serve as a generator/cooler for portable electronic devices. Electrodeposition have an advantage to be utilized to fabricate TE micro-devices, attributed to its ability to deposit thick films, which can be used to fabricate cross-plane devices, with controlled morphology, composition, and crystal structure. The performance of the TE micro-devices are for now limited because of low efficiency. More researches about thermoelectric properties of electrodeposited materials and the performance of devices need to be further studied for wide applications.
Author Contributions
JK, J-HL, and NM contributed conception and design of the study; TW and M-SK organized the database; TW and JK performed the statistical analysis; TW and JK wrote the draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (No. 20010638, No. 20016338) funded By the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling Editor declared a past co-authorship with the authors JK and JL.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abad, B., Rull-Bravo, M., Hodson, S. L., Xu, X., and Martin-Gonzalez, M. (2015). Thermoelectric Properties of Electrodeposited Tellurium Films and the Sodium Lignosulfonate Effect. Electrochimica Acta 169, 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.063
Abellán, M., Schrebler, R., and Gómez, H. (2015). Electrodeposition of Bi2Te3 Thin Films onto FTO Substrates from DMSO Solution. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 10 (9), 7409–7422.
Agapescu, C., Cojocaru, A., Cotarta, A., and Visan, T. (2013). Electrodeposition of Bismuth, Tellurium, and Bismuth telluride Thin Films from Choline Chloride-Oxalic Acid Ionic Liquid. J. Appl. Electrochem. 43 (3), 309–321. doi:10.1007/s10800-012-0487-0
Bae, S., Lee, S., Sohn, H.-S., and Lee, H. S. (2017). Synthesis and Characteristics of PbTe1−xSex Thin Films Formed via Electrodeposition. Met. Mater. Int. 23 (5), 1056–1061. doi:10.1007/s12540-017-7009-x
Banga, D., Lensch-Falk, J. L., Medlin, D. L., Stavila, V., Yang, N. Y. C., Robinson, D. B., et al. (2012). Periodic Modulation of Sb Stoichiometry in Bi2Te3/Bi2-xSbxTe3Multilayers Using Pulsed Electrodeposition. Cryst. Growth Des. 12 (3), 1347–1353. doi:10.1021/cg2014418
Banga, D. O., Vaidyanathan, R., Xuehai, L., Stickney, J. L., Cox, S., and Happeck, U. (2008). Formation of PbTe Nanofilms by Electrochemical Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD). Electrochimica Acta 53 (23), 6988–6994. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.02.108
Boulanger, C. (2010). Thermoelectric Material Electroplating: A Historical Review. J. Elec Materi 39 (9), 1818–1827. doi:10.1007/s11664-010-1079-6
Caballero-Calero, O., Díaz-Chao, P., Abad, B., Manzano, C. V., Ynsa, M. D., Romero, J. J., et al. (2014). Improvement of Bismuth Telluride Electrodeposited Films by the Addition of Sodium Lignosulfonate. Electrochimica Acta 123, 117–126. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.12.185
Caballero-Calero, O., Mohner, M., Casas, M., Abad, B., Rull, M., Borca-Tasciuc, D. A., et al. (2015). Improvements on Electrodeposited Bi2Te3-ySey Films by Different Additives. Mater. Today Proc. 2 (2), 620–628. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2015.05.087
Cao, Y., Zeng, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Shen, C., Wang, X., et al. (2013). Electrodeposition and Thermoelectric Characterization of (00L)-Oriented Bi2Te3Thin Films on Silicon with Seed Layer. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160 (11), D565–D569. doi:10.1149/2.099311jes
Catrangiu, A.-S., Sin, I., Prioteasa, P., Cotarta, A., Cojocaru, A., Anicai, L., et al. (2016). Studies of Antimony telluride and Copper telluride Films Electrodeposition from Choline Chloride Containing Ionic Liquids. Thin Solid Films 611, 88–100. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2016.04.030
Chang, C. H., Rheem, Y., Choa, Y.-H., Shin, D. H., Park, D.-Y., and Myung, N. V. (2010). Bi and Te Thin Films Synthesized by Galvanic Displacement from Acidic Nitric Baths. Electrochimica Acta 55 (3), 743–752. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2009.09.038
Chang, T., Cho, S., Kim, J., Schoenleber, J., Frantz, C., Stein, N., et al. (2015). Individual Thermoelectric Properties of Electrodeposited Bismuth telluride Nanowires in Polycarbonate Membranes. Electrochimica Acta 161, 403–407. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.105
Chen, C.-L., Chen, Y.-Y., Lin, S.-J., Ho, J. C., Lee, P.-C., Chen, C.-D., et al. (2010). Fabrication and Characterization of Electrodeposited Bismuth telluride Films and Nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. C 114 (8), 3385–3389. doi:10.1021/jp909926z
Diliberto, S., Richoux, V., Stein, N., and Boulanger, C. (2008). Influence of Pulsed Electrodeposition on Stoichiometry and Thermoelectric Properties of Bismuth telluride Films. Phys. Stat. Sol. (A) 205 (10), 2340–2344. doi:10.1002/pssa.200779416
Dou, X., Li, G., Lei, H., Huang, X., Li, L., and Boyd, I. W. (2009). Template Epitaxial Growth of Thermoelectric Bi/BiSb Superlattice Nanowires by Charge-Controlled Pulse Electrodeposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (9), K149–K154. doi:10.1149/1.3156639
Dou, X., Li, G., and Lei, H. (2008). Kinetic versus Thermodynamic Control over Growth Process of Electrodeposited Bi/BiSb Superlattice Nanowires. Nano Lett. 8 (5), 1286–1290. doi:10.1021/nl073039b
Dughaish, Z. H. (2002). Lead telluride as a Thermoelectric Material for Thermoelectric Power Generation. Physica B: Condensed Matter 322 (1–2), 205–223. doi:10.1016/s0921-4526(02)01187-0
Elazem, D., Jung, H., Wu, T., Lim, J.-H., Lee, K.-H., and Myung, N. V. (2013). Morphology Change of Galvanically Displaced One-Dimensional Tellurium Nanostructures via Controlling the Microstructure of Sacrificial Ni Thin Films. Electrochimica Acta 106, 447–452. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.117
Erdoan, B. Y., and Demir, Ü. (2011). Orientation-controlled Synthesis and Characterization of Bi 2Te3 Nanofilms, and Nanowires via Electrochemical Co-deposition. Electrochimica Acta 56 (5), 2385–2393.
Erdoğan, İ. Y., Ozar, T. O., and Demir, U. (2009). PbTe Alkaline _ Co-deposition. Thin Solid Films 517 (18), 5419–5424.
Faleev, S. V., and Léonard, F. (2008). Theory of Enhancement of Thermoelectric Properties of Materials with Nanoinclusions. Phys. Rev. B 77 (21), 214304. doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.214304
Frantz, C., Stein, N., Gravier, L., Granville, S., and Boulanger, C. (2010). Electrodeposition and Characterization of Bismuth telluride Nanowires. J. Elec Materi 39 (9), 2043–2048. doi:10.1007/s11664-009-1001-2
Frantz, C., Stein, N., Zhang, Y., Bouzy, E., Picht, O., Toimil-Molares, M. E., et al. (2012). Electrodeposition of Bismuth telluride Nanowires with Controlled Composition in Polycarbonate Membranes. Electrochimica Acta 69, 30–37. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.040
Frantz, C., Vichery, C., Michler, J., and Philippe, L. (2015). Electrodeposition of PbTe Thin Films: Electrochemical Behavior and Effect of Reverse Pulse Potential. Electrochimica Acta 173, 490–496. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.045
Frantz, C., Zhang, Y., Michler, J., and Philippe, L. (2016). On the Growth Mechanism of Electrodeposited PbTe Dendrites. CrystEngComm 18 (13), 2319–2326. doi:10.1039/c6ce00107f
Fu, J., Shi, J., Zhu, M., Liang, Y., Zhang, G., Shi, H., et al. (2013). Large‐scale Synthesis and Characterisation of Ag/Bi 2 Te 3 Superlattice Nanowires via Pulse Electrodeposition. Micro Nano Lett. 8 (4), 188–190. doi:10.1049/mnl.2012.0850
Gan, Y. X., Sweetman, J., and Lawrence, J. G. (2010). Electrodeposition and Morphology Analysis of Bi-te Thermoelectric alloy Nanoparticles on Copper Substrate. Mater. Lett. 64 (3), 449–452. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2009.11.045
Glatz, W., Durrer, L., Schwyter, E., and Hierold, C. (2008). Novel Mixed Method for the Electrochemical Deposition of Thick Layers of Bi2+xTe3−x with Controlled Stoichiometry. Electrochimica Acta 54 (2), 755–762. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.06.065
Golgovici, F., Cojocaru, A., Anicai, L., and Visan, T. (2011). Surface Characterization of BiSbTe Thermoelectric Films Electrodeposited from Chlorides Aqueous Solutions and Choline Chloride Based Ionic Liquids. Mater. Chem. Phys. 126 (3), 700–706. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.12.058
Golgovici, F., Cojocaru, A., Nedelcu, M., and Visan, T. (2010). Cathodic Deposition of Components in BiSbTe Ternary Compounds as Thermoelectric Films Using Choline-Chloride-Based Ionic Liquids. J. Elec Materi 39 (9), 2079–2084. doi:10.1007/s11664-009-1006-x
Ha, Y. C., Sohn, H. J., Jeong, G., Lee, C., and Rhee, K. I. (2000). Electrowinning of Tellurium From Alkaline Leach Liquor of Cemented Te. J. Appl. Electrochem. 30 (3), 315–322.
Hangarter, C. M., Lee, Y.-I., Hernandez, S. C., Choa, Y.-h., and Myung, N. V. (2010). Nanopeapods by Galvanic Displacement Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Edition 49 (39), 7081–7085. doi:10.1002/anie.201001559
Hasan, M., Gautam, D., and Enright, R. (2016). Electrodeposition of Textured Bi27Sb28Te45 Nanowires with Enhanced Electrical Conductivity. Mater. Chem. Phys. 173, 438–445. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.02.035
Hatsuta, N., Takemori, D., and Takashiri, M. (2016). Effect of thermal Annealing on the Structural and Thermoelectric Properties of Electrodeposited Antimony telluride Thin Films. J. Alloys Comp. 685, 147–152. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.268
Hsu, K. F., Loo, S., Guo, F., Chen, W., Dyck, J. S., Uher, C., et al. (2004). Cubic AgPb M SbTe 2+ M : Bulk Thermoelectric Materials with High Figure of Merit. Science 303 (5659), 818–821. doi:10.1126/science.1092963
Ikemiya, N., Iwai, D., Yamada, K., Vidu, R., and Hara, S. (1996). Atomic Structures and Growth Morphologies of Electrodeposited Te Film on Au(100) and Au(111) Observed by In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy. Surf. Sci. 369 (1–3), 199–208. doi:10.1016/s0039-6028(96)00881-3
Jagadish, P. R., Li, L. P., Chan, A., and Khalid, M. (2016). Effect of Annealing on Virgin and Recycled Carbon Fiber Electrochemically Deposited with N-type Bismuth Telluride and Bismuth Sulfide. Mater. Manufacturing Process. 31 (9), 1223–1231. doi:10.1080/10426914.2015.1090590
Jagadish, R., Lau, P., and Chan, A. (2015). Effect of Annealing on Virgin and Recycled Carbon Fibre Electrochemically-Deposited with N-type Bismuth Telluride. Chem. Eng. Trans. 45, 1435–1440.
Jiang, C. H., Wei, W., Yang, Z. M., Tian, C., and Zhang, J. S. (2011). Electrodeposition of Tellurium Film on Polyaniline-Coated Macroporous Phenolic Foam and its Thermopower. J. Porous Mater. 19 (5), 819–823. doi:10.1007/s10934-011-9536-z
Jiang, C. H., Wei, W., Yang, Z. M., Tian, C., and Zhang, J. S. (2012). Electrodeposition of Tellurium Film on Polyaniline-Coated Macroporous Phenolic Foam and its Thermopower. J. Porous Mater. 19 (5), 819–823. doi:10.1007/s10934-011-9536-z
Jiang, Q., Liu, C., Song, H., Xu, J., Mo, D., Shi, H., et al. (2014). Free-standing PEDOT: PSS Film as Electrode for the Electrodeposition of Bismuth telluride and its Thermoelectric Performance. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 9 (12), 7540–7551.
Jin, Y., and Wang, W. (2010). Effect of Substrate on the Structure and Thermoelectric Properties of N-type Bi2Te3−y Se Y Thin Films Prepared by Electrodeposition. J. Elec Materi 39 (9), 1469–1475. doi:10.1007/s11664-010-1306-1
Jung, H., Park, D.-Y., Xiao, F., Lee, K. H., Choa, Y.-H., Yoo, B., et al. (2011). Electrodeposited Single Crystalline PbTe Nanowires and Their Transport Properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 115 (7), 2993–2998. doi:10.1021/jp110739v
Jung, H., Suh, H., Hangarter, C., and Lim, J. H. (2012). Programmable Synthesis of Shape-, Structure-, and Composition-Modulated One-Dimensional Heterostructures by Galvanic Displacement Reaction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 (22), 1. doi:10.1063/1.4722919
Kang, W.-S., Li, W.-J., Chou, W.-C., Tseng, M.-F., and Lin, C.-S. (2017). Microstructure and Thermoelectric Properties of Bi 2 Te 3 Electrodeposits Plated in Nitric and Hydrochloric Acid Baths. Thin Solid Films 623, 90–97. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2016.12.047
Kim, J., Lee, J.-Y., Lim, J.-H., and Myung, N. V. (2016). Optimization of Thermoelectric Properties of P-type AgSbTe2 Thin Films via Electrochemical Synthesis. Electrochimica Acta 196, 579–586. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.206
Kim, J., Lee, K. H., Kim, S.-D., Lim, J.-H., and Myung, N. V. (2018). Simple and Effective Fabrication of Sb2Te3 Films Embedded with Ag2Te Nanoprecipitates for Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance. J. Mater. Chem. A. 6, 349–356. doi:10.1039/c7ta09013g
Kim, J., Lim, J.-H., and Myung, N. V. (2018). Composition- and Crystallinity-dependent Thermoelectric Properties of Ternary BixSb2-xTey Films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 429, 158–163. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.260
Kim, J., Zhang, M., Bosze, W., Park, S.-D., Lim, J.-H., and Myung, N. V. (2015). Maximizing Thermoelectric Properties by Nanoinclusion of γ-SbTe in Sb2Te3 Film via Solid-State Phase Transition from Amorphous Sb-Te Electrodeposits. Nano Energy 13, 727–734. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.03.020
Kim, M.-Y., and Oh, T.-S. (2010b). Crystallization Behavior and Thermoelectric Characteristics of the Electrodeposited Sb2Te3 Thin Films. Thin Solid Films 518 (22), 6550–6553. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.052
Kim, M.-Y., and Oh, T.-S. (2009). Electrodeposition and Thermoelectric Characteristics of Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 Films for Thermopile Sensor Applications. J. Elec Materi 38 (7), 1176–1181. doi:10.1007/s11664-008-0653-7
Kim, M.-Y., and Oh, T.-S. (2010a). Thermoelectric Characteristics of the Thermopile Sensors Processed with the Electrodeposited Bi-te and Sb-Te Thin Films. Surf. Rev. Lett. 17 (03), 311–316. doi:10.1142/s0218625x10013813
Kim, M.-Y., and Oh, T.-S. (2013). Thermoelectric Power Generation Characteristics of a Thin-Film Device Consisting of Electrodeposited N-Bi2Te3 and P-Sb2Te3 Thin-Film Legs. J. Elec Materi 42 (9), 2752–2757. doi:10.1007/s11664-013-2671-3
Ko, D.-K., Kang, Y., and Murray, C. B. (2011). Enhanced Thermopower via Carrier Energy Filtering in Solution-Processable Pt-Sb2Te3 Nanocomposites. Nano Lett. 11 (7), 2841–2844. doi:10.1021/nl2012246
Köse, H., Bicer, M., Tutunoglu, C., Aydin, A. O., and Sisman, I. (2009). The Underpotential Deposition of Bi2Te3-ySey Thin Films by an Electrochemical Co-deposition Method. Electrochimica Acta 54 (6), 1680–1686.
Kuleshova, J., Koukharenko, E., Li, X., Frety, N., Nandhakumar, I. S., Tudor, J., et al. (2010). Optimization of the Electrodeposition Process of High-Performance Bismuth Antimony telluride Compounds for Thermoelectric Applications. Langmuir 26 (22), 16980–16985. doi:10.1021/la101952y
Kulsi, C., Kargupta, K., and Banerjee, D. (2016). “Process Dependent Thermoelectric Properties of EDTA Assisted Bismuth telluride,” in AIP Conference Proceedings (IEEE). doi:10.1063/1.4945148
Kulsi, C., Mitra, M., Kargupta, K., Ganguly, S., Banerjee, D., and Goswami, S. (2015). Effect of Different Surfactants and Thicknesses on Electrodeposited Films of Bismuth telluride and its Thermoelectric Performance. Mater. Res. Express 2 (10), 106403. doi:10.1088/2053-1591/2/10/106403
Lal, S., Gautam, D., and Razeeb, K. M. (2017). The Impact of Surfactant Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate on the Microstructure and Thermoelectric Properties of P-type (Sb1-xBix)2Te3Electrodeposited Films. ECS J. Solid State. Sci. Technol. 6 (3), N3017–N3021. doi:10.1149/2.0041703jss
Lee, J., Farhangfar, S., Lee, J., Cagnon, L., Scholz, R., Gösele, U., et al. (2008). Tuning the Crystallinity of Thermoelectric Bi2Te3nanowire Arrays Grown by Pulsed Electrodeposition. Nanotechnology 19 (36), 365701. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/19/36/365701
Lee, J., Kim, Y., Caglon, L., and Gosele, U. (2010). Power Factor Measurements of Bismuth telluride Nanowires Grown by Pulsed Electrodeposition. physica status solidi (Rrl) - Rapid Res. Lett. 4 (1-2), 43–45. doi:10.1002/pssr.200903368
Lee, K.-J., Song, H., Lee, Y.-I., Jung, H., Zhang, M., Choa, Y.-H., et al. (2011). Synthesis of Ultra-long Hollow Chalcogenide Nanofibers. Chem. Commun. 47 (32), 9107–9109. doi:10.1039/c1cc12312b
Lei, C., Burton, M., and Nandhakumar, I. S. (2017). Electrochemical Formation of P-type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3Thick Films onto Nickel. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 (4), D192–D195. doi:10.1149/2.1151704jes
Lei, C., Burton, M. R., and Nandhakumar, I. S. (2016). Facile Production of Thermoelectric Bismuth telluride Thick Films in the Presence of Polyvinyl Alcohol. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 (21), 14164–14167. doi:10.1039/c6cp02360f
Lei, C., Ryder, K. S., Koukharenko, E., Burton, M., and Nandhakumar, I. S. (2016). Electrochemical Deposition of Bismuth telluride Thick Layers onto Nickel. Electrochemistry Commun. 66, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2016.02.005
Lensch-Falk, J. L., Banga, D., Hopkins, P. E., Robinson, D. B., Stavila, V., Sharma, P. A., et al. (2012). Electrodeposition and Characterization of Nano-Crystalline Antimony telluride Thin Films. Thin Solid Films 520 (19), 6109–6117. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2012.05.078
Li, F.-H., and Wang, W. (2010). Electrodeposition of P-type BixSb2−xTey Thermoelectric Film from Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solution. Electrochimica Acta 55 (17), 5000–5005. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.005
Li, F.-H., Wang, W., and Gao, J.-p. (2010). Electrodeposition of Bi X Sb2−x Te Y Thermoelectric Films from DMSO Solution. J. Elec Materi 39 (9), 1562–1565. doi:10.1007/s11664-010-1284-3
Li, F.-H., Wang, W., Gong, Y.-L., and Li, J.-Y. (2012). Electrodeposition of Sb X Te Y Thermoelectric Films from Dimethyl Sulfoxide Solution. J. Elec Materi 41 (11), 3039–3043. doi:10.1007/s11664-012-2202-7
Li, F., and Wang, W. (2009). Electrodeposition of BixSb2−xTey Thermoelectric Thin Films from Nitric Acid and Hydrochloric Acid Systems. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (7), 4225–4231. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.11.013
Li, G.-R., Yao, C.-Z., Lu, X.-H., Zheng, F.-L., Feng, Z.-P., Yu, X.-L., et al. (2008). Facile and Efficient Electrochemical Synthesis of PbTe Dendritic Structures. Chem. Mater. 20 (10), 3306–3314. doi:10.1021/cm8001942
Li, G.-r., Zheng, F.-l., and Tong, Y.-x. (2008). Controllable Synthesis of Bi2Te3 Intermetallic Compounds with Hierarchical Nanostructures via Electrochemical Deposition Route. Cryst. Growth Des. 8 (4), 1226–1232. doi:10.1021/cg700790h
Li, L., Xu, S., and Li, G. (2015). Enhancement of Thermoelectric Properties in Bi-sb-te Alloy Nanowires by Pulsed Electrodeposition. Energ. Tech. 3 (8), 825–829. doi:10.1002/ente.201500071
Li, W.-J. (2009). Electrodeposition of Bismuth telluride Films from a Nonaqueous Solvent. Electrochimica Acta 54 (27), 7167–7172. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2009.07.008
Li, W.-J., Yu, W.-L., and Yen, C.-Y. (2011). Pulsed Electrodeposition of Bi2Te3 and Bi2Te3/Te Nanowire Arrays from a DMSO Solution. Electrochimica Acta 58 (1), 510–515. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.09.075
Li, X.-H., Zhou, B., Pu, L., and Zhu, J.-J. (2008). Electrodeposition of Bi2Te3 and Bi2Te3 Derived Alloy Nanotube Arrays. Cryst. Growth Des. 8 (3), 771–775. doi:10.1021/cg7006759
Li, X.-l., Cai, K.-f., Li, H., Wang, L., and Zhou, C.-w. (2010). Electrodeposition and Characterization of Thermoelectric Bi2Se3 Thin Films. Int. J. Miner Metall. Mater. 17 (1), 104–107. doi:10.1007/s12613-010-0118-x
Li, X. L., Cai, K. F., Li, H., Yu, D. H., Wang, X., and Wang, H. F. (2010). Alumina Template-Assisted Electrodeposition of Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 Nanowire Arrays. Superlattices and Microstructures 47 (6), 710–713. doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2010.03.009
Li, X. L., Cai, K. F., Yu, D. H., and Wang, Y. Y. (2011). Electrodeposition and Characterization of Thermoelectric Bi2Te2Se/Te Multilayer Nanowire Arrays. Superlattices and Microstructures 50 (5), 557–562. doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2011.09.001
Lim, J.-H., Park, M., Lim, D.-C., Myung, N. V., Lee, J.-H., Jeong, Y.-K., et al. (2012). Synthesis and Thermoelectric/electrical Characterization of Electrodeposited SbxTey Thin Films. Mater. Res. Bull. 47 (10), 2748–2751. doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.04.140
Lim, J.-H., Park, M. Y., Lim, D. C., Yoo, B., Lee, J.-H., Myung, N. V., et al. (2011). Electrodeposition of P-type Sb X Te Y Thermoelectric Films. J. Elec Materi 40 (5), 1321–1325. doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1629-6
Lim, J. H., Park, M., Lim, D.-C., and Myung, N. V. (2012). Electrical/Themoelectric Characterization of Electrodeposited Bi xSb2-xTe3 Thin Films. AIP Conf. Proc. 1449, 91–94. doi:10.1063/1.4731504
Lim, S.-K., Kim, M.-Y., and Oh, T.-S. (2009). Thermoelectric Properties of the Bismuth-Antimony-telluride and the Antimony-telluride Films Processed by Electrodeposition for Micro-device Applications. Thin Solid Films 517 (14), 4199–4203. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2009.02.005
Limmer, S. J., Medlin, D. L., Siegal, M. P., Hekmaty, M., Lensch-Falk, J. L., Erickson, K., et al. (2015). Using Galvanostatic Electroforming of Bi1–xSbx Nanowires to Control Composition, Crystallinity, and Orientation. J. Mater. Res. 30 (02), 164–169. doi:10.1557/jmr.2014.354
Limmer, S. J., Yelton, W. G., Siegal, M. P., Lensch-Falk, J. L., Pillars, J., and Medlin, D. L. (2012). Electrochemical Deposition of Bi2(Te,Se)3Nanowire Arrays on Si. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159 (4), D235–D239. doi:10.1149/2.084204jes
Liu, D.-W., and Li, J.-F. (2008). Electrocrystallization Process during Deposition of Bi-te Films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155 (7), D493. doi:10.1149/1.2907398
Liu, D.-W., and Li, J.-F. (2011). Microfabrication of Thermoelectric Modules by Patterned Electrodeposition Using a Multi-Channel Glass Template. J. Solid State. Electrochem. 15 (3), 479–484. doi:10.1007/s10008-010-1104-y
Ma, Y., Johansson, A., Ahlberg, E. P., and Anders, E. C. (2010). A Mechanistic Study of Electrodeposition of Bismuth Telluride on Stainless Steel Substrates. Electrochimica Acta 55 (15), 4610–4617. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.018
Ma, Y., Ahlberg, E., Sun, Y., Iversen, B. B., and Palmqvist, A. E. C. (2011). Thermoelectric Properties of Thin Films of Bismuth telluride Electrochemically Deposited on Stainless Steel Substrates. Electrochimica Acta 56 (11), 4216–4223. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.093
Ma, Y., Wijesekara, W., and Palmqvist, A. E. C. (2012). Thermoelectric Characteristics of Electrochemically Deposited Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3 Thin Films of Relevance to Multilayer Preparation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 159 (2), D50.
Ma, Y., Wijesekara, W., and Palmqvist, A. E. C. (2012). Electrochemical Deposition and Characterization of Thermoelectric Ternary (Bi X Sb1−x )2Te3 and Bi2(Te1−y Se Y )3 Thin Films. J. Elec Materi 41 (6), 1138–1146. doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1790-y
Maas, M., Diliberto, S., de Vaulx, C., Azzouz, K., and Boulanger, C. (2014). Use of a Soluble Anode in Electrodeposition of Thick Bismuth Telluride Layers. J. Elec Materi 43 (10), 3857–3862. doi:10.1007/s11664-014-3292-1
Mannam, R., Agarwal, M., Roy, A., Singh, V., Varahramyan, K., and Davis, D. (2009). Electrodeposition and Thermoelectric Characterization of Bismuth Telluride Nanowires. J. Electrochem. Soc. 156 (8), B871. doi:10.1149/1.3139011
Manzano, C. V., Abad, B., Muñoz Rojo, M., Koh, Y. R., Hodson, S. L., Lopez Martinez, A. M., et al. (2016). Anisotropic Effects on the Thermoelectric Properties of Highly Oriented Electrodeposited Bi2Te3 Films. Sci. Rep. 6 (1), 19129. doi:10.1038/srep19129
Manzano, C. V., Rojas, A. A., Decepida, M., Abad, B., Feliz, Y., Caballero-Calero, O., et al. (2013). Thermoelectric Properties of Bi2Te3 Films by Constant and Pulsed Electrodeposition. J. Solid State. Electrochem. 17 (7), 2071–2078. doi:10.1007/s10008-013-2066-7
Martin, J., Wang, L., Chen, L., and Nolas, G. S. (2009). Enhanced Seebeck Coefficient through Energy-Barrier Scattering in PbTe Nanocomposites. Phys. Rev. B 79 (11), 115311. doi:10.1103/physrevb.79.115311
Matsuoka, K., Okuhata, M., and Takashiri, M. (2015). Dual-bath Electrodeposition of N-type Bi-Te/Bi-se Multilayer Thin Films. J. Alloys Comp. 649, 721–725. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.166
Mavrokefalos, A., Moore, A. L., Pettes, M. T., Shi, L., Wang, W., and Li, X. (2009). Thermoelectric and Structural Characterizations of Individual Electrodeposited Bismuth telluride Nanowires. J. Appl. Phys. 105 (10), 104318. doi:10.1063/1.3133145
Müller, S., Schötz, C., Picht, O., Sigle, W., Kopold, P., Rauber, M., et al. (2012). Electrochemical Synthesis of Bi 1– X Sb X Nanowires with Simultaneous Control on Size, Composition, and Surface Roughness. Cryst. Growth Des. 12 (2), 615–621.
Na, J., Kim, Y., Park, T., Park, C., and Kim, E. (2016). Preparation of Bismuth Telluride Films with High Thermoelectric Power Factor. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 8 (47), 32392–32400. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b10188
Narducci, D., Selezneva, E., Cerofolini, G., Frabboni, S., and Ottaviani, G. (2012). Impact of Energy Filtering and Carrier Localization on the Thermoelectric Properties of Granular Semiconductors. J. Solid State. Chem. 193 (0), 19–25. doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2012.03.032
Naylor, A. J., Koukharenko, E., Nandhakumar, I. S., and White, N. M. (2012). Surfactant-Mediated Electrodeposition of Bismuth Telluride Films and its Effect on Microstructural Properties. Langmuir 28 (22), 8296–8299. doi:10.1021/la301367m
Ng, I. K., Kok, K.-Y., Rahman, C. Z., Saidin, N. U., Ilias, S. H., Choo, T.-F., et al. (2014). Electrochemically Deposited BiTe-Based Nanowires for Thermoelectric Applications. AIP Conf. Proc. 1584, 125–128. doi:10.1063/1.4866117
Nguyen, H. P., Peng, X., Murugan, G., Vullers, R. J. M., Vereecken, P. M., and Fransaer, J. (2013). Electrodeposition of Antimony, Tellurium and Their Alloys from Molten Acetamide Mixtures. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160 (2), D75–D79. doi:10.1149/2.003303jes
Nguyen, H. P., Wu, M., Su, J., Vullers, R. J. M., Vereecken, P. M., and Fransaer, J. (2012). Electrodeposition of Bismuth telluride Thermoelectric Films from a Nonaqueous Electrolyte Using Ethylene Glycol. Electrochimica Acta 68, 9–17. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.091
Ni, Y., Zhang, Y., and Hong, J. (2011). Potentiostatic Electrodeposition Route for Quick Synthesis of Featherlike PbTe Dendrites: Influencing Factors and Shape Evolution. Cryst. Growth Des. 11 (6), 2142–2148. doi:10.1021/cg101400w
Nolas, G. S., Sharp, J., and Goldsmid, H. J. (2001). Thermoelectrics : Basic Principles and New Materials Developments. New York: Springer.
Park, H., Jung, H., Zhang, M., Chang, C. H., Ndifor-Angwafor, N. G., Choa, Y., et al. (2013). Branched Tellurium Hollow Nanofibers by Galvanic Displacement Reaction and Their Sensing Performance toward Nitrogen Dioxide. Nanoscale 5 (7), 3058–3062. doi:10.1039/c3nr00060e
Park, K., Xiao, F., Yoo, B. Y., Rheem, Y., and Myung, N. V. (2009). Electrochemical Deposition of Thermoelectric SbxTey Thin Films and Nanowires. J. Alloys Comp. 485 (1-2), 362–366. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.106
Patil, P. B., Mali, S. S., Khot, K. V., Kondalkar, V. V., Ghanwat, V. B., Mane, R. M., et al. (2016). Synthesis of Bismuth Telluride Thin Film for Thermoelectric Application via Electrodeposition Technique. Macromol. Symp. 361 (1), 152–155. doi:10.1002/masy.201400234
Patil, P. B., Mali, S. S., Kondalkar, V. V., Mane, R. M., Patil, P. S., Hong, C. K., et al. (2015). Morphologically Controlled Electrodeposition of Fern Shaped Bi2Te3 Thin Films for Photoelectrochemical Performance. J. Electroanalytical Chem. 758, 178–190. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.09.019
Pelz, U., Jaklin, J., Rostek, R., Thoma, F., Kröner, M., and Woias, P. (2016). Fabrication Process for Micro Thermoelectric Generators (μTEGs). J. Elec Materi 45 (3), 1502–1507. doi:10.1007/s11664-015-4088-7
Peranio, N., Leister, E., Töllner, W., Eibl, O., and Nielsch, K. (2012). Stoichiometry Controlled, Single-Crystalline Bi2Te3 Nanowires for Transport in the Basal Plane. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 (1), 151–156. doi:10.1002/adfm.201101273
Pinisetty, D., Davis, D., Podlaha-Murphy, E. J., Murphy, M. C., Karki, A. B., Young, D. P., et al. (2011). Characterization of Electrodeposited Bismuth-Tellurium Nanowires and Nanotubes. Acta Materialia 59 (6), 2455–2461. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.047
Pinisetty, D., Gupta, M., Karki, A. B., Young, D. P., and Devireddy, R. V. (2011). Fabrication and Characterization of Electrodeposited Antimony telluride Crystalline Nanowires and Nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. 21 (12), 4098–4107. doi:10.1039/c0jm01969k
Poudel, B., Hao, Q., Ma, Y., Lan, Y., Minnich, A., Yu, B., et al. (2008). High-Thermoelectric Performance of Nanostructured Bismuth Antimony Telluride Bulk Alloys. Science 320 (5876), 634–638. doi:10.1126/science.1156446
Qiu, C. X., and Shih, I. (1989). Epitaxial Growth of Tellurium by Electrodeposition. Mater. Lett. 8 (8), 309–312. doi:10.1016/0167-577x(89)90173-0
Qiu, W. J., Yang, S. H., Zhu, T. J., Xie, J., and Zhao, X. B. (2011). Antimony telluride Thin Films Electrodeposited in an Alkaline Electrolyte. J. Elec Materi 40 (7), 1506–1511. doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1647-4
Qiu, X., Lou, Y., Samia, A. C. S., Devadoss, A., Burgess, J. D., Dayal, S., et al. (2005). PbTe Nanorods by Sonoelectrochemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (36), 5855–5857. doi:10.1002/anie.200501282
Rashid, M. M., Cho, K. H., and Chung, G.-S. (2013). Rapid thermal Annealing Effects on the Microstructure and the Thermoelectric Properties of Electrodeposited Bi2Te3 Film. Appl. Surf. Sci. 279, 23–30. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.03.112
Rashid, M. M., and Chung, G.-S. (2013). Effect of Deposition Conditions on the Microstructure and the Thermoelectric Properties of Galvanostatically Electrodeposited Bi2Te3 Film. Surf. Rev. Lett. 20 (05), 1350044. doi:10.1142/s0218625x13500443
Mirandaa, C. R. B., Abramof, P. G., Melo, F. C. L., and Ferreira, N. G. (2004). Morphology and Stress Study of Nanostructured Porous Silicon as a Substrate for PbTe Thin Films Growth by Electrochemical Process. Mater. Res. 7, 619–623.
Richoux, V., Diliberto, S., and Boulanger, C. (2010). Pulsed Electroplating: a Derivate Form of Electrodeposition for Improvement of (Bi1−x Sb X )2Te3 Thin Films. J. Elec Materi 39 (9), 1914–1919. doi:10.1007/s11664-009-1054-2
Rostek, R., Sklyarenko, V., and Woias, P. (2011). Influence of Vapor Annealing on the Thermoelectric Properties of Electrodeposited Bi2Te3. J. Mater. Res. 26 (15), 1785–1790. doi:10.1557/jmr.2011.141
Rostek, R., Stein, N., and Boulanger, C. (2015). A Review of Electroplating for V-VI Thermoelectric Films: from Synthesis to Device Integration. J. Mater. Res. 30 (17), 2518–2543. doi:10.1557/jmr.2015.203
Roth, R., Rostek, R., Cobry, K., Kohler, C., Groh, M., and Woias, P. (2014). Design and Characterization of Micro Thermoelectric Cross-Plane Generators with Electroplated ${\rm Bi}_{2}{\rm Te}_{3}$ , ${\rm Sb}_{x}{\rm Te}_{y}$ , and Reflow Soldering. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 23 (4), 961–971. doi:10.1109/jmems.2014.2303198
Sadeghi, M., Dastan, M., Ensaf, M. R., Tehrani, A. A., Tenreiro, C., and Avila, M. (2008). Thick Tellurium Electrodeposition on Nickel-Coated Copper Substrate for 124I Production. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 66 (10), 1281–1286. doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.02.082
Saloniemi, H., Kanniainen, T., Ritala, M., and Leskela, M. (1998). PbTe Alkaline _ Underpotential Deposition _ Potential & Composition. Thin Solid Films 326 (1–2), 78–82. doi:10.1016/s0040-6090(98)00524-0
Saloniemi, H., Kemell, M., Ritala, M., and Leskelä, M. (2000). PbTe Electrodeposition Studied by Combined Electrochemical Quartz crystal Microbalance and Cyclic Voltammetry. J. Electroanalytical Chem. 482 (2), 139–148. doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(00)00038-3
Schumacher, C., Reinsberg, K. G., Akinsinde, L., Zastrow, S., Heiderich, S., Toellner, W., et al. (2012). Optimization of Electrodeposited P-Doped Sb2Te3 Thermoelectric Films by Millisecond Potentiostatic Pulses. Adv. Energ. Mater. 2 (3), 345–352. doi:10.1002/aenm.201100585
Shin, K.-J., and Oh, T.-S. (2015). Micro-Power Generation Characteristics of Thermoelectric Thin Film Devices Processed by Electrodeposition and Flip-Chip Bonding. J. Elec Materi 44 (6), 2026–2033. doi:10.1007/s11664-015-3647-2
Şişman, İ., and Başoğlu, A. (2016). Effect of Se Content on the Structural, Morphological and Optical Properties of Bi2Te3−ySey Thin Films Electrodeposited by under Potential Deposition Technique. Mater. Sci. Semiconductor Process. 54, 57–64.
Snyder, G. J., Lim, J. R., Huang, C.-K., and Fleurial, J.-P. (2003). Thermoelectric Microdevice Fabricated by a MEMS-like Electrochemical Process. Nat. Mater 2 (8), 528–531. doi:10.1038/nmat943
Snyder, G. J., and Toberer, E. S. (2008). Complex Thermoelectric Materials. Nat. Mater 7 (2), 105–114. doi:10.1038/nmat2090
Snyder, G. J., and Ursell, T. S. (2003). Thermoelectric Efficiency and Compatibility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (14), 148301. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.148301
Song, Y., Yoo, I.-J., Heo, N.-R., Lim, D. C., Lee, D., Lee, J. Y., et al. (2015). Electrodeposition of Thermoelectric Bi2Te3 Thin Films with Added Surfactant. Curr. Appl. Phys. 15 (3), 261–264. doi:10.1016/j.cap.2014.12.004
Sootsman, J. R., Chung, D. Y., and Kanatzidis, M. G. (2009). New and Old Concepts in Thermoelectric Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (46), 8616–8639. doi:10.1002/anie.200900598
Sorenson, T. A., Suggs, D. W., Nandhakumar, I. S., and Stickney, J. L. (1999). Phase Transitions in the Electrodeposition of Tellurium Atomic Layers on Au(100). J. Electroanalytical Chem. 467 (1–2), 270–281. doi:10.1016/s0022-0728(99)00053-4
Sorenson, T. A., Varazo, K., Suggs, D. W., and Stickney, J. L. (2001). Formation of and Phase Transitions in Electrodeposited Tellurium Atomic Layers on Au(111). Surf. Sci. 470 (3), 197–214. doi:10.1016/s0039-6028(00)00861-x
Souza, P. B., Tumelero, M. A., Zangari, G., and Pasa, A. A. (2017). Tuning Electrodeposition Conditions towards the Formation of Smooth Bi2Se3Thin Films. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 (7), D401–D405. doi:10.1149/2.0531707jes
Suggs, D. W., and Stickney, J. L. (1991). Characterization of Atomic Layers of Tellurium Electrodeposited on the Low-index Planes of Gold. J. Phys. Chem. 95 (24), 10056–10064. doi:10.1021/j100177a081
Suh, H., Jung, H. S., Myung, N. V., and Hong, K. (2014). Bamboo-like Te Nanotubes with Tailored Dimensions Synthesized from Segmental NiFe Nanowires as Sacrificial Templates. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 35 (11), 3227–3231. doi:10.5012/bkcs.2014.35.11.3227
Suh, H., Noh, J., Lee, J.-H., Lee, S.-H., Myung, N. V., Hong, K., et al. (2017). Morphological Evolution of Te and Bi2Te3 Microstructures during Galvanic Displacement of Electrodeposited Co Thin Films. Electrochimica Acta 255, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.049
Sumithra, S., Takas, N. J., Misra, D. K., Nolting, W. M., Poudeu, P. F. P., and Stokes, K. L. (2011). Enhancement in Thermoelectric Figure of Merit in Nanostructured Bi2Te3 with Semimetal Nanoinclusions. Adv. Energ. Mater. 1 (6), 1141–1147. doi:10.1002/aenm.201100338
Suresh, A., Chatterjee, K., Sharma, V. K., Ganguly, S., Kargupta, K., and Banerjee, D. (2009). Effect of pH on Structural and Electrical Properties of Electrodeposited Bi2Te3 Thin Films. J. Elec Materi 38 (3), 449–452. doi:10.1007/s11664-008-0635-9
Szczech, J. R., Higgins, J. M., and Jin, S. (2011). Enhancement of the Thermoelectric Properties in Nanoscale and Nanostructured Materials. J. Mater. Chem. 21 (12), 4037–4055. doi:10.1039/c0jm02755c
Szymczak, J., Legeai, S., Michel, S., Diliberto, S., Stein, N., and Boulanger, C. (2014). Electrodeposition of Stoichiometric Bismuth telluride Bi2Te3 Using a Piperidinium Ionic Liquid Binary Mixture. Electrochimica Acta 137, 586–594. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.036
Tumelero, M. A., Benetti, L. C., Isoppo, E., Faccio, R., Zangari, G., and Pasa, A. A. (2016). Electrodeposition and Ab Initio Studies of Metastable Orthorhombic Bi2Se3: A Novel Semiconductor with Bandgap for Photovoltaic Applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 120 (22), 11797–11806. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02559
Uda, K., Seki, Y., Saito, M., Sonobe, Y., Hsieh, Y.-C., Takahashi, H., et al. (2015). Fabrication of Π-structured Bi-te Thermoelectric Micro-device by Electrodeposition. Electrochimica Acta 153, 515–522. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.019
Ueda, M., Mito, Y., and Ohtsuka, T. (2008). Electrodeposition of Sb-Te Alloy in AlCl3-NaCl-KCl Molten Salt. Mater. Trans. 49 (8), 1720–1722. doi:10.2320/matertrans.e-mra2008811
Wang, W., Ji, Y., Xu, H., Li, H., Visan, T., and Golgovici, F. (2013). A High Packing Density Micro-thermoelectric Power Generator Based on Film Thermoelectric Materials Fabricated by Electrodeposition Technology. Surf. Coat. Tech. 231, 583–589. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.04.048
Wang, W., Zhang, G., and Li, X. (2008). Manipulating Growth of Thermoelectric Bi2Te3/Sb Multilayered Nanowire Arrays. J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (39), 15190–15194. doi:10.1021/jp803207r
Weber, J. E., Yelton, W. G., and Kumar, A. (2008). “Electrodeposition of Bi1-xSbx Nanowires as an Advanced Material for Thermoelectric Applications,” in Functionalized Nanoscale Materials, 2008 (Springer, Dordrecht: Devices and Systems), 425–429.
Wu, M., Binnemans, K., and Fransaer, J. (2014). Electrodeposition of Antimony from Chloride-free Ethylene Glycol Solutions and Fabrication of Thermoelectric Bi2Te3/(Bi1−xSbx)2Te3 Multilayers Using Pulsed Potential Electrodeposition. Electrochimica Acta 147, 451–459. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.111
Wu, M., Nguyen, H. P., Vullers, R. J. M., Vereecken, P. M., Binnemans, K., and Fransaer, J. (2013). Electrodeposition of Bismuth Telluride Thermoelectric Films from Chloride-free Ethylene Glycol Solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160 (4), D196–D201. doi:10.1149/2.089304jes
Wu, M., Ramírez, S. A., Shafahian, E., Guo, L., Glorieux, C., Binnemans, K., et al. (2017). Electrodeposition of Bismuth telluride Thin Films Containing Silica Nanoparticles for Thermoelectric Applications. Electrochimica Acta 253, 554–562. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.012
Wu, T., Lee, H.-K., and Myung, N. V. (2016). Electrodeposition of Dense Lead Telluride Thick Films in Alkaline Solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163 (14), D801–D808. doi:10.1149/2.0631614jes
Wu, T., Zhang, M., Lee, K.-H., Lee, C.-M., Lee, H.-K., Choa, Y., et al. (2017). Electrodeposition of Compact Tellurium Thick Films from Alkaline Baths. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 (2), D82–D87. doi:10.1149/2.1191702jes
Wu, Y., Lin, Z., Tian, Z., Han, C., Liu, J., Zhang, H., et al. (2016). Fabrication of Microstructured Thermoelectric Bi2Te3 Thin Films by Seed Layer Assisted Electrodeposition. Mater. Sci. Semiconductor Process. 46, 17–22. doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2016.01.014
Xiao, C., Yang, J., Zhu, W., Peng, J., and Zhang, J. (2009). Electrodeposition and Characterization of Bi2Se3 Thin Films by Electrochemical Atomic Layer Epitaxy (ECALE). Electrochimica Acta 54 (27), 6821–6826. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.089
Xiao, F., Hangarter, C., Yoo, B., Rheem, Y., Lee, K.-H., and Myung, N. V. (2008). Recent Progress in Electrodeposition of Thermoelectric Thin Films and Nanostructures. Electrochimica Acta 53 (28), 8103–8117. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.06.015
Xiaolong, L., and Zhen, X. (2014). The Effect of Electrochemical Conditions on Morphology and Properties of Bi2Se3 Thick Films by Electrodeposition. Mater. Lett. 129, 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2014.05.009
Xue, Z., Li, X.-L., and Yu, D.-m. (2014). Bi2Se3/Bi Multiple Heterostructure Nanowire Arrays Formed by Pulsed Electrodeposition. Superlattices and Microstructures 74, 273–278. doi:10.1016/j.spmi.2014.06.012
Yagi, I., Lantz, J. M., Nakabayashi, S., Corn, R. M., and Uosaki, K. (1996). In Situ optical Second Harmonic Generation Studies of Electrochemical Deposition of Tellurium on Polycrystalline Gold Electrodes. J. Electroanalytical Chem. 401 (1–2), 95–101. doi:10.1016/0022-0728(95)04285-7
Yang, C.-K., Cheng, T.-C., Chen, T.-H., and Chu, S.-H. (2016). The Thermoelectric Properties of Electrochemically Deposited Te-Sb-Bi Films on Ito Glass Substrate. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 11 (5), 3767–3775. doi:10.20964/110371
Yang, Y., Kung, S. C., Taggart, D. K., Xiang, C., Yang, F., Brown, M. A., et al. (2008). Synthesis of PbTe Nanowire Arrays Using Lithographically Patterned Nanowire Electrodeposition. Nano Lett. 8 (8), 2447–2451. doi:10.1021/nl801442c
Yoo, I.-J., Lim, D. C., Myung, N. V., Jeong, Y.-K., Kim, Y. D., Lee, K. H., et al. (2013). Electrical/thermoelectric Characterization of Electrodeposited Bi X Sb2−x Te3 Thin Films. Electron. Mater. Lett. 9 (5), 687–691. doi:10.1007/s13391-013-2246-8
Yoo, I.-J., Myung, N. V., Lim, D. C., Song, Y., Jeong, Y.-K., Kim, Y. D., et al. (2013). Electrodeposition of BixTey Thin Films for Thermoelectric Application. Thin Solid Films 546 (3), 48–52. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2013.05.036
Yoo, I.-J., Song, Y., Chan Lim, D., Myung, N. V., Lee, K. H., Oh, M., et al. (2013). Thermoelectric Characteristics of Sb2Te3 Thin Films Formed via Surfactant-Assisted Electrodeposition. J. Mater. Chem. A. 1 (17), 5430. doi:10.1039/c3ta01631e
Zebarjadi, M., Esfarjani, K., Dresselhaus, M. S., Ren, Z. F., and Chen, G. (2012). Perspectives on Thermoelectrics: from Fundamentals to Device Applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 5 (1), 5147–5162. doi:10.1039/c1ee02497c
Zeng, G., Zide, J. M. O., Kim, W., Bowers, J. E., Gossard, A. C., Bian, Z., et al. (2007). Cross-plane Seebeck Coefficient of ErAs:InGaAs∕InGaAlAs Superlattices. J. Appl. Phys. 101 (3), 034502. doi:10.1063/1.2433751
Zhang, Y., Snedaker, M. L., Birkel, C. S., Mubeen, S., Ji, X., Shi, Y., et al. (2012). Silver-Based Intermetallic Heterostructures in Sb2Te3 Thick Films with Enhanced Thermoelectric Power Factors. Nano Lett. 12 (2), 1075–1080. doi:10.1021/nl204346g
Zhou, A., Fu, Q., Zhang, W., Yang, B., Li, J., Ziolkowski, P., et al. (2015). Enhancing the Thermoelectric Properties of the Electroplated Bi 2 Te 3 Films by Tuning the Pulse Off-To-On Ratio. Electrochimica Acta 178, 217–224. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.164
Zhou, J., Lin, Q., Li, H., and Cheng, X. (2013). Phosphorus-doped Bismuth telluride Films by Electrodeposition. Mater. Chem. Phys. 141 (1), 401–405. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.05.033
Zhu, W., Yang, Y., Zhou, D., and Xiao, C. (2008). Electrochemical Atom-By-Atom Growth of Highly Uniform Thin Sheets of Thermoelectric Bismuth telluride via the Route of ECALE. J. Electroanalytical Chem. 614 (1-2), 41–48. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2007.11.014
Zhu, Y.-B., and Wang, W. (2012). Microstructure and Thermoelectric Properties of P-type Bi-sb-te-se Thin Films Prepared by Electrodeposition Method. Thin Solid Films 520 (7), 2474–2478. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.020
Zide, J. M. O., Vashaee, D., and Gossard, A. (2006). Demonstration of Electron Filtering to Increase the Seebeck Coefficient in In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.53Ga0.28Al0.19As Superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 74, 205335. doi:10.1103/PHYSREVB.74.205335
Zou, Z., Chen, S., and Cai, K. (2014). Preparation and Characterization of Electrodeposited CuxBi2Te3 Thermoelectric Films. Mater. Sci. Forum 787, 205–209.
Keywords: electrodeposition, electroplating, thermoelectrics, nanoengineering, defect engineering
Citation: Wu T, Kim J, Lim J-H, Kim M-S and Myung NV (2021) Comprehensive Review on Thermoelectric Electrodeposits: Enhancing Thermoelectric Performance Through Nanoengineering. Front. Chem. 9:762896. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.762896
Received: 23 August 2021; Accepted: 04 October 2021;
Published: 21 December 2021.
Edited by:
Yong-Ho Choa, Hanyang University, South KoreaReviewed by:
Kun-Jae Lee, Dankook University, South KoreaHyo-Ryoung Lim, Pukyong National University, South Korea
Copyright © 2021 Wu, Kim, Lim, Kim and Myung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tingjun Wu, tingjun.wu@hotmail.com; Jiwon Kim, jkim@iae.re.kr