Dopant-Free Hole Transporting Material Based on Nonconjugated Adamantane for High-Performance Perovskite Solar Cells

A new dopant-free hole transporting material (HTM) 4′,4‴,4‴'',4‴''''-(adamantane-1,3,5,7-tetrayl)tetrakis(N,N-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-amine) (Ad-Ph-OMeTAD) (named FDY for short), which consists of a nonconjugated 3D bulky caged adamantane (Ad) as the core, triphenyl amines as side arms, and phenyl units as a linking bridge, is synthesized and applied in an inverted planar perovskite solar cell (PSC). As a result, the champion device with FDY as HTM yields an impressive power of conversion efficiency (PCE) of 18.69%, with J_SC = 22.42 mA cm⁻², V_OC = 1.05 V, and FF = 79.31% under standard AM 1.5G illumination, which is ca. 20% higher than that of the device based on PEDOT:PSS (only 15.41%). Notably, the stability of PSC based on FDY is much better than that of devices based on PEDOT:PSS, and the corresponding devices retain over 90% of their initial PCEs after storing for 60 days in a nitrogen glove box without any encapsulation. Even when stored in an open air condition with 50–60% relative humidity for 188 h, the retained PCE is still over 81% of its initial one. All these results demonstrate that the new design strategy by combing the bulky and nonconjugated (aliphatic) adamantane unit as the core and triphenyl amines as side arms can efficiently develop highly efficient HTMs for PSCs, which is different from the traditional way based on conjugated backbones, and it may open a new way for scientists to design small-molecule HTMs for PSCs.

Introduction

As one of the new-generation photovoltaic technologies, perovskite solar cells (PSCs) herald the arrival of the new energy era because of their rapidly great progresses during the last two decades (Burschka et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2012; Bi et al., 2013; Jeon et al., 2015). The best recorded power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs is up to 25.5% with a regular mesoporous structure and over 23% with an inverted planar (p-i-n type) structure (Li et al., 2020), due to the unique optoelectronic properties of perovskite materials (Stranks et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020). As one of the key components in high-performance PSCs, hole transporting materials (HTMs) (Xing et al., 2013) play several key roles such as the following: 1) the hole extraction and transferring; 2) reducing energy loss between the perovskite layer and anode; 3) affecting crystallization and morphology of perovskite in inverted devices; and 4) improving stability of PSCs by preventing infusion of O₂ and moisture into the perovskite layer in regular devices. However, very few HTMs can satisfy the requirements of PSCs so far, and even the widely used HTMs such as poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly (styrene sulfonic acid) (PEDOT:PSS), polytriarylamine (PTAA), and doped Spiro-OMeTAD still have many drawbacks. For PEDOT:PSS, 1) the mismatch between its work function and the HOMO energy level of perovskite usually yields low open-circuit voltage (V_OC) of the device; (Meng et al., 2016) and 2) the hydrophilicity and acidity of PEDOT:PSS can result in a degradation of perovskite, leading to low stability of PSCs, while for PTAA, 1) its grave hydrophobicity usually causes a poor interfacial contact between PTAA and the perovskite layer, resulting in the charge recombination loss further (Huang et al., 2015); 2) the necessary dopants, such as F4-TCNQ, to improve the mobility of PTAA may increase a tendency of ion migration and decrease the long-term stability of device (Zhou et al., 2018); and 3) the high cost of PTAA limits its application in large-scale manufacturing (Pham et al., 2017). Regarding Spiro-OMeTAD, the necessary additives such as Li-TFSI and 4-tert-butylpyridine (tBP) usually cause ion migration and degradation of perovskite, both of which make the PSCs unstable. So, developing highly efficient but cheap and easily synthesized dopant-free HTMs is urgent but challenging.

During the last two decades, lots of efforts have been carried out to find highly efficient HTMs for PSCs and many inorganic HTMs (Liu et al., 2018a; Yang et al., 2018; Yu and Sun, 2018) (such as NiOx and CuI), organic HTMs including polymers (Sun et al., 2018; Jung et al., 2019) (such as P3HT, PTAA, PPY2, and PPE1), and organic small molecules (Liu et al., 2018b; Wang et al., 2019) (such as MPA-BTTI and DFH) have been investigated and achieved a great progress with PCEs over 20%.

Compared with inorganic HTMs and polymer HTMs, organic small molecule–based HTMs (SM-HTMs) have many advantages, such as the following: 1) tunable HOMO/LUMO energy levels; 2) easy synthesis and purification; and 3) very good batch-to-batch repeatability. So, more and more scientists worked on SM-HTMs during the last decade. Scheme 1 summarizes most of the dopant-free SM-HTMs with excellent PCEs for PSCs (Saliba et al., 2016). After analyzing their chemical structures, it is obviously found that most of the HTMs are constructed with π-conjugated backbones to keep their good intermolecular π–π stacking in order to yield high mobility (Chen et al., 2019; Pham et al., 2019; Cai et al., 2019; Yin et al., 2020). However, some of them such as Spir-OMeTAD (Jiang et al., 2019a; Jiang et al., 2019b) and DFH (Cao et al., 2019) (shown in Scheme 1) are constructed with a rigid spiro core unit, which usually destroys the intermolecular π–π stacking and decreases the hole mobility. The nonconjugated and rigid spiro structures demonstrate that the conjugated backbones in HTMs may not be necessary, and this inspires us to explore a new way to design HTMs for high-performance PSCs. In 2019, we first designed saddle-shaped HTMs named α, β-COTh-Ph-OMeTAD (Lai et al., 2019a) with the strategy of flexible core with tunable conformation (FCTC), in which the configuration of α, β-cycloocta[1,2-b:4,3-b′:5,6-b′:8,7-b′′′]tetrathiophenyl (α, β-COTh) (Rezaee et al., 2018) can be tuned based on the interactions between side arms and perovskite or interactions between side arms themselves, which may lead to a good balance of mobility and charge recombination, and achieved the champion PCE of 17.22% under AM 1.5 conditions with the regular mesoporous device structure. Later on, Nazaruding’s group (Snaith and Grätzel, 2006) and Yang’s group (van Duren et al., 2004) also independently reported similar results with the PCE of 16.3 and 17.7%, respectively. In 2020, we synthesized β, β-COTh-Ph-OMeTAD (Meng et al., 2020) and achieved a PCE of 18.53% in inverted planar PSCs. Recently, Wang’s group (Wang et al., 2021) and Ahmad’s group (Urieta-Mora et al., 2019) extended the COTh to COPh (o-tetraphenylene) and COI (tetra-indole) and synthesized OTP-OMeDPA and TTI, achieving a PCE of 21.5 and 19.23% in regular mesoporous PSCs, respectively. All these results demonstrate that even when the conjugate of backbones are partially destroyed with a flexible 3D structure of cyclooctatetraene in HTMs, they still can lead to high-performance PSCs. So, how is the conjugated core important in HTMs? The curiosity inspired us to design a unique structure of HTMs with adamantane (Ad) as the core and triphenylamines as side arms, in which the Ad structure is an aliphatic cage unit and can destroy the conjugation of HTM completely. To reduce the negative influence of the bulky structure of Ad on the intermolecular π–π stacking of side arms and enhance hole mobility of new HTM, we introduced a phenyl group as a bridge between Ad and side arms. The structure of new HTM (Ad-Ph-OMeTAD) (named FDY for short) is shown in Scheme 1, and its highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)/lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy levels are −5.24/−2.09 eV, respectively. We fabricated the inverted planar PSCs with a structure of ITO/ HTM/ perovskite / PC₆₁BM/ BCP/ Ag in which either PEDOT:PSS or FDY was as a dopant-free HTM. As a result, the devices based on FDY have a champion PCE of 18.69% with a J_SC of 22.42 mA cm⁻², V_OC of 1.05 V, and FF of 79.31% under the standard AM 1.5G illumination, which is around 20% higher than that of devices based on PEDOT:PSS (PCE = 15.41%, J_SC = 19.38 mA cm⁻², V_OC = 1.02 V, and FF = 78.08%). These results demonstrate that hole transport materials with a rigid nonconjugated structures such as adamantane as the core also have great potential for high-performance PSCs, and the new strategy may open a new way to design hole transport materials for high performance of PSCs.

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT. A new hole transporting material (HTM) Ad-Ph-OMeTAD (named FDY for short) with a nonconjugated 3D bulky caged adamantane (Ad) as the core is reported and applied in an inverted planar perovskite solar cell (PSC) with a power of conversion efficiency of 18.69%.

SCHEME 1

SCHEME 1. Strategies of HTMs Based-on Small Molecules.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Properties of HTM (Ad-Ph-OMeTAD)

As shown in Scheme S1, the compound FDY was synthesized from commercially available compounds 1,3,5,7-tetrakis(4-iodophenyl) adamantane and (N, N-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)) via Suzuki cross-coupling with good yield. The structure was characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Supplementary Figures S1–2, Supporting Information). The thermal properties were determined by thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry, respectively. The compound FDY exhibits an appropriate thermal stability with a phase transition temperature at 91°C and a decomposed temperature at 400°C (Supplementary Figures S4A,B, Supporting Information). Due to the bulky three-dimensional structure of adamantane, the intermolecular interaction is weak and the glass transition temperature is low. This maybe a benefit to form a better stacking mode of side arms when the film of FDY is treated with thermal annealing and enhance the hole extraction and the transport efficiency of FDY films.

As shown in Supplementary Figure S3A, the UV–vis absorption of FDY film is mainly at 300–400 nm, and the absorption positions of the solution and the film are similar, indicating that the intermolecular π–π stacking of FDY in the film is relatively weak. According to the onsite of the UV–vis absorption spectrum, we calculated the optical band gap of FDY is 3.15 eV, and the HOMO/ LUMO energy levels of FDY were determined by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) measurement, as shown in Supplementary Figure S3. The valence regions (E_onset) and secondary electron cutoff edges (E_cutoff) are determined to be −8.94 eV (Supplementary Figure S3D) and 7.04 eV (Supplementary Figure S3E), respectively. The HOMO/LUMO energy levels of FDY are calculated to be −5.24 eV and −2.09 eV, respectively. Compared with PEDOT:PSS (−5.0 eV) and PTAA (−5.22 eV), the HOMO energy level of FDY matches much better with the valence band maximum of MAPbI₃; meanwhile, the lower LUMO energy level of FDY can effectively block the migration of electrons and avoid a nonradiative recombination at the interface between perovskite and HTM, which usually may lead to a higher Voc.

The mobility of FDY was determined by the space charge limited current (SCLC) method with a hole-only device based on a structure of ITO/PEDOT: PSS/FDY/Au, and it is determined to be 7.62 × 10^–5 cm² V⁻¹s⁻¹ (Supplementary Figure S5, Supporting Information) (Snaith and Grätzel, 2006). All optical and electrochemical data of FDY are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1

TABLE 1. Optical and electrochemical properties of FDY.

Device Performance and Characterization

To evaluate the performance of FDY as dopant-free HTM in inverted perovskite solar cells, we fabricated the corresponding devices with a structure of ITO/ FDY/ MAPbI₃/ PC₆₁BM/ BCP/ Ag and the control devices with PEDOT:PSS as HTM for comparison (Figure 1A), and the energy levels of respective layers are shown in Figure 1B. For all devices, the light-absorbing layer was prepared with MAPbI₃ by the one-step antisolvent method. The concentrations of FDY were optimized to improve the performance of PSCs (Supplementary Table S1), and the best PCE of 18.69% with a J_SC of 22.42 mA cm⁻², V_OC of 1.05 V, and FF of 79.31% was achieved with a concentration of 2.0 mg ml⁻¹ in toluene and the hysteresis was negligible, which is much better than that of the control device based on PEDOT:PSS (PCE = 15.41% with a J_SC of 19.38 mA cm⁻², V_OC of 1.02 V, and FF of 78.08%). Figure 1C displays the current density–voltage (J–V) curves for the optimized devices under the standard AM 1.5G illumination, and the results are summarized in Table 2. The EQE spectrum was executed to confirm J_SC values obtained from the J–V curve tested under the solar simulation, as shown in Figure 1D. The integrated J_SC from EQE is calculated to be 21.52 mA cm⁻² for FDY and 18.71 mA cm⁻² for PEDOT:PSS-based devices, respectively. Both match very well with the current from the J–V curve. Furthermore, we measured the stabilized power outputs for 300 s at the maximum power point. The PCEs obtained from the stabilized power outputs are 18.31 and 14.61% for the devices based on FDY and PEDOT:PSS (Figure 1E), respectively, indicating a good reliability of the devices. As shown in Figure 1F, the dark current of the devices with FDY and PEDOT:PSS was measured, and the device with FDY in a thickness of 10 nm (2 mg ml⁻¹) showed a lower leakage current, implying there was less recombination in the device.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. (A) Device structure and (B) energy levels of individual layers used in the device, comparing the energy levels of FDY and PEDOT:PSS. (C) J–V curves (forward and reverse scans) of the best PSCs prepared by PEDOT:PSS and FDY HTL under AM1.5G illumination, showing negligible hysteresis. (D) EQE spectrum and corresponding integrated short-circuit current density. (E) The steady-state efficiency of the champion device based on FDY HTL at the maximum power point for 300 s. (F) The dark J–V curves of the devices.

TABLE 2

TABLE 2. Performances of PSCs based on PEDOT:PSS and FDY.

To understand the role of FDY on PSCs further, steady-state photoluminescence (PL) and time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) were measured. From Figure 2A, it is obviously found that the peak intensity of PL of perovskite on FDY (with a quench efficiency of 95.5%) was weaker than that on PEDOT:PSS (85.4%), indicating that the FDY as HTM can extract holes from the perovskite layer much easier than PEDOT:PSS. As literature reported, HTM as the substrate in inverted planar devices usually affects the quality of the perovskite film (Lai et al., 2019b). From the TRPL tests (Figure 2B), we obtained the carrier lifetimes of perovskite films based on FDY and PEDOT:PSS, and the details are summarized in Supplementary Table S2. The photocarrier lifetimes of perovskite films depositing on FDY are τ₁ = 2.86 ns and τ₂ = 25.28 ns, and those of PEDOT:PSS are τ ₁ = 8.11 ns and τ₂ = 14.48 ns. Shorter τ₁ lifetime means that the FDY film has stronger hole extraction ability and the hole can be transferred from perovskite to HTL more quickly. The results of τ₂ indicate that the perovskite films prepared on FDY films have fewer defects and excitons can exist for a longer time in perovskite films before recombination.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. (A) Steady-state PL spectra and (B) the decay curves of the TRPL intensity of the bare perovskite film and those fabricated on FDY and PEDOT:PSS upon illumination with a 450 nm laser. (C) Transient photovoltage characteristics and (D) transient photocurrent characteristics of devices based on PEDOT:PSS and FDY HTL.

Transient photovoltage (TPV) and transient photocurrent (TPC) tests were also carried out, which are often used to characterize carrier lifetimes and carrier extraction efficiency in organic solar cells (Clarke et al., 2014). The longer lifetime of TPV indicates the longer lifetime of generated carriers in an open-circuit state, demonstrating the lesser nonradiative recombination in the device. The TPV measurement in Figure 2C shows that the carrier lifetime of the device on FDY is significantly longer than that on the PEDOT: PSS. It means that the nonradiative recombination at the interface of FDY and perovskite is less than that of PEDOT:PSS, which is consistent with the higher V_OC of devices based on FDY HTL. Meanwhile, as shown in Figure 2D in the TPC test, the lifetime represents the stay time of the photogenerated carriers in the short-circuit state of the device, and the device on FDY has a TPC decay faster than that on PEDOT:PSS, indicating that FDY has a stronger hole extraction ability and faster hole transfer ability from the perovskite layer to the electrode. The longer decay TPV and shorter decay TPC of the device on FDY indicate that the FDY HTL improves the extraction efficiency of holes while reducing the nonradiative recombination in the interface, which may lead to a higher Voc than PEDOT:PSS.

To further investigate the charge recombination of the devices based on FDY, the light intensity dependence of J–V characteristics was conducted. The slope of V_OC versus natural logarithm of illumination intensity gives kT/q in a trap-free system, where k, T, and q are the Boltzmann constant, temperature in Kelvin, and the elementary charge, respectively (Cao et al., 2019). As shown in Supplementary Figure S6, the fitting results for n of PEDOT:PSS and FDY are 1.51 and 1.36, respectively. A higher value of n indicates that PEDOT: PSS causes a serious monomolecular recombination in the device when used as HTL; in contrast, FDY can reduce the trap density of the device and inhibit charge recombination when used as HTL, which corresponds to the PL and TRPL measurements.

In order to compare the different effects of FDY and PEDOT:PSS on the perovskite layer, AFM was used to characterize the roughness of the HTM layer. As shown in Supplementary Figure S7 (Supporting Information), the root mean square roughness of PEDOT:PSS is 2.70 nm, while that of FDY is 2.88 nm, and both films are very smooth with almost the same roughness. However, the tests of contact angle demonstrate that the surface property of two films are very different, which affects the morphology of the perovskite layer noticeably. As shown in Figures 3A,B, the contact angle of PEDOT:PSS is only 9° with water, due to its high hydrophilicity, while that of FDY is 74°, which is much more hydrophobic and can effectively prevent the water from eroding the perovskite film and can also keep a suitable wettability with the perovskite precursor solution. All these will be conducive to the preparation of a homogeneous and dense perovskite film and enhancing the stability of devices (as discussed in the following).

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. The contact angle images of (A) PEDOT:PSS and (B) FDY films; top surface SEM of perovskite films fabricated on (C) PEDOT:PSS and (D) FDY HTL.

The morphology of perovskite films on FDY and PEDOT:PSS was tested by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Figures 3C,D). Compared with the film on PEDOT:PSS, the MAPbI₃ perovskite film on FDY has much larger grain sizes and less grain boundaries, which leads to higher crystal quality of the perovskite layer and improves the charge extraction from perovskite to HTM. The results agree very well with that of PL, TRPL, TPV, and TPC.

In addition, X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterization also shows that the perovskite films deposited on FDY have better crystallinity. As shown in Figure 4, the intensities of peaks of (110) and (220) of the perovskite film on FDY film are much higher than those on PEDOT:PSS comparing with the peak of (312). It shows that the hydrophobicity of the FDY film can not only increase the grain size of the perovskite film but also improve the crystallinity of the perovskite film.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. XRD of quartz /PEDOT: PSS/perovskite and quartz /FDY/ perovskite.

As discussed above, the suitable hydrophobicity of FDY should be beneficial to the stability of PSCs not only by preventing the perovskite film from the moisture but also by improving the crystal quality of the perovskite film. The stabilities of PSCs based on FDY and PEDOT:PSS were measured as shown in Figure 5. Interestingly, the PCE of the device based on FDY was retained more than 90% of its initial one after storing for 60 days in a nitrogen glove box without any encapsulation while that of device based on PEDOT:PSS in the same condition dropped down to 50% in 50 days (Figure 5A), which may be caused by the corrosion of acidic PEDOT:PSS on the perovskite film. Moreover, when the devices based on FDY were stored for 188 h in an ambient air with 50–60% relative humidity (Figure 5B), the PCE still remained at 81% of its initial one, while that of the PEDOT:PSS-based device dropped down to 43% of its initial one. The excellent long-term stability of FDY-based devices may benefit from the high hydrophobicity of the FDY film and high quality of the perovskite film.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. Stability test of the unencapsulated devices based on PEDOT:PSS and FDY HTL (A) stored in a N₂ glove box in the dark at room temperature and (B) stored in air with 50–60% relative humidity.

Conclusion

In summary, we synthesize a new dopant-free SM-HTM with a nonconjugated aliphatic motif adamantane as the core and triphenyl amines as side arms and applied it in inverted planar PSCs. After systematical investigation, it is found that the HTM FDY can enhance the quality of perovskite films and decrease the nonradiative charge recombination and all of them can improve the PCE and stability of PSCs. The champion device with FDY yields an impressive PCE of 18.69% with Jsc = 22.42 mA cm⁻², V_OC = 1.05 V, and FF = 79.31% under standard AM 1.5G illumination with a very impressive long-term stability, especially even stored for 188 h in an open air with 50–60% relative humidity without any encapsulation, the PCE still retained more than 80% of its initial one. Our results may open a new way to design SM-HTMs for high-performance PSCs by introducing an aliphatic nonconjugated bulky core such as adamantane and so on.

Experiment

Materials

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(styrene sulfonic acid) (PEDOT:PSS), PbI₂ (99.99%, TCI), MAI (Aus), PC₆₁BM (Xi’an P-OLED), 2,9-dimethyl-4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (BCP), (98%+, Aldrich), anhydrous N, N, dimethylformamide (DMF), anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), toluene (99.8%), and anhydrous chlorobenzene (CB) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All reagents were used directly without any further purification.

Perovskite Precursors

650 mg PbI₂ (99.99%, TCI) and 224.2 mg MAI (Aus) were dissolved in 1.0 ml mixed solvent of DMF:DMSO = 4:1. Then, the solution was stirred overnight at room temperature and then filtered with 0.22 µm syringe PTFE filters.

Device Fabrication

PSCs with the structure of ITO/ PEDOT:PSS or FDY /MAPbI₃/PC₆₁BM/BCP/Ag were fabricated, wherein the ITO was the bottom layer. ITO glass substrates were sequentially washed with soap water, acetone, and isopropanol for 30 min and dried with N₂. Then, the glasses were treated with a UV cleaner for 20 min. The PEDOT:PSS film was fabricated by spin-coating the PEDOT:PSS aqueous dispersion at 5,000 rpm for 45 s after filtering. Different concentrations of FDY were dissolved in toluene, and the films were spin-coated onto the ITO substrate at 5,000 rpm for 45 s and then were annealed at 150°C for 10 min. After being transferred into a glovebox, the perovskite films were spin-coated on substrates with a solution of 50 μl perovskite precursor at 4,000 rpm for 20 s and the antisolvent of 120 μl chlorobenzene was dropped on the perovskite layer during the 6th second. The films were annealed at 80°C for 10 min, immediately. An electron transport layer of PC₆₁BM (99.5%, Xi’an P-OLED) was deposited from a chlorobenzene solution (20 mg ml⁻¹) at 1,000 rpm for 40 s, and then, a bathocuproine (98% +, Aldrich) solution (0.5 mg ml⁻¹ in ethanol) was spin-coated at 4,000 rpm for 40 s. Finally, device fabrication was completed by thermal evaporation of a 80 nm thick film with Ag as the cathode.

Film Characterization

The 1H NMR spectra were measured on an MECUYR-VX300 spectrometer. The UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2500 recording spectrophotometer. Ultraviolet and UPS measurements were performed in an ultrahigh vacuum surface analysis system equipped with a SCIENTA R3000 spectrometer with a base pressure of 10⁻¹⁰ mbar. UPS employed the He I 21.22 eV as the excitation source with an energy resolution of 50 meV. XRD patterns were recorded using a PANalytical X-ray diffractometer with Cu Ka radiation for crystallinity comparison. The scanning step size was 0.01°.

Device Characterization

The current–voltage (J-V) curves of the solar cells were characterized after fabrication without any preconditioning via a Keithley 2,400 system under an Enli Solar Simulator (AM 1.5 G,100 mW cm⁻²). The certified device active area of 0.11 cm² was defined by the designed mask to avoid overestimation of the photocurrent density. NREL certified Si cells (KG-5) were used to calibrate the light intensity. The J–V curves were measured from 1.2 to 0 V (reverse scan) and 0–1.2 V (forward scan) with a step of 0.02 V in a glove box at RT. The EQE spectra were obtained using a QE-R system (Enli Tech.) under the AC mode. All of the PSCs had no encapsulation. Transient photovoltage decay was recorded by using a digital oscilloscope (DOS-X 3104A) at an open-circuit condition.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

GL, AK, JW, and WH conceived and directed the research. DF and RZ designed the experiments, fabricated the devices, and acquired the data. YL, ZS, and XL synthesized the hole transporting materials. CS, WL, YW, FX, and HF performed material characterizations. CS wrote the manuscript. All of the authors contributed to the discussions.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0204704), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51773091 and 22075140), Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (XCL-026), and the Open Project Program of Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics (No. 2020WNLOKF010), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515010916), High-level University Fund (G02236004), and Peacock Team Project (No. KQTD2016030111203005).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

GL thanks the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0204704), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51773091 and 22075140), Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (XCL-026), and the Open Project Program of Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics (No. 2020WNLOKF010) for the general support. AK would like to thank the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2020A1515010916), High-level University Fund (G02236004), and Peacock Team Project (No. KQTD2016030111203005) for the support provided.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.746365/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

¹http/www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/best-research-cell-efficiencies.20200925.pdf.

References

Bi, D., Moon, S.-J., Häggman, L., Boschloo, G., Yang, L., Johansson, E. M. J., et al. (2013). Using a Two-step Deposition Technique to Prepare Perovskite (CH3NH3PbI3) for Thin Film Solar Cells Based on ZrO2 and TiO2 Mesostructures. RSC Adv. 3, 18762. doi:10.1039/c3ra43228a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burschka, J., Pellet, N., Moon, S.-J., Humphry-Baker, R., Gao, P., Nazeeruddin, M. K., et al. (2013). Sequential Deposition as a Route to High-Performance Perovskite-Sensitized Solar Cells. Nature 499, 316–319. doi:10.1038/nature12340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, B., Yang, X., Jiang, X., Yu, Z., Hagfeldt, A., and Sun, L. (2019). Boosting the Power Conversion Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells to 17.7% with an Indolo[3,2-B]carbazole Dopant-free Hole Transporting Material by Improving its Spatial Configuration. J. Mater. Chem. A. 7, 14835–14841. doi:10.1039/c9ta04166d

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, Y., Li, Y., Morrissey, T., Lam, B., Patrick, B. O., Dvorak, D. J., et al. (2019). Dopant-free Molecular Hole Transport Material that Mediates a 20% Power Conversion Efficiency in a Perovskite Solar Cell. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 3502–3507. doi:10.1039/c9ee02983d

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Xu, X., Cai, N., Qian, S., Luo, R., Huo, Y., et al. (2019). Perovskite Cells: Rational Design of Dopant‐Free Coplanar D‐π‐D Hole‐Transporting Materials for High‐Performance Perovskite Solar Cells with Fill Factor Exceeding 80% (Adv. Energy Mater. 39/2019). Adv. Energ. Mater. 9, 1970150. doi:10.1002/aenm.201970150

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clarke, T. M., Lungenschmied, C., Peet, J., Drolet, N., and Mozer, A. J. (2014). A Comparison of Five Experimental Techniques to Measure Charge Carrier Lifetime in Polymer/Fullerene Solar Cells. Adv. Energ. Mater. 5, 1401345. doi:10.1002/aenm.201401345

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, Y., Ma, J., Lei, H., Yao, F., Li, B., Xiong, L., et al. (2018). Enhanced Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells via Anti-solvent Nonfullerene Lewis Base IT-4F Induced Trap-Passivation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 6, 5919–5925. doi:10.1039/c8ta00583d

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, S.-M., Xu, S.-Y., Belopolski, I., Lee, C.-C., Chang, G., Wang, B., et al. (2015). A Weyl Fermion Semimetal with Surface Fermi Arcs in the Transition Metal Monopnictide TaAs Class. Nat. Commun. 6, 7373. doi:10.1038/ncomms8373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jeon, N. J., Noh, J. H., Yang, W. S., Kim, Y. C., Ryu, S., Seo, J., et al. (2015). Compositional Engineering of Perovskite Materials for High-Performance Solar Cells. Nature 517, 476–480. doi:10.1038/nature14133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, K., Wu, F., Zhang, G., Zhu, L., and Yan, H. (2019). Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Dopant‐Free Spiro‐OMeTAD Processed with Halogen‐Free Green Solvent. Sol. RRL 3, 1900061. doi:10.1002/solr.201900061

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, Q., Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, X., Chen, Y., Chu, Z., et al. (2019). Surface Passivation of Perovskite Film for Efficient Solar Cells. Nat. Photon. 13, 460–466. doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0398-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jung, E. H., Jeon, N. J., Park, E. Y., Moon, C. S., Shin, T. J., Yang, T.-Y., et al. (2019). Efficient, Stable and Scalable Perovskite Solar Cells Using Poly(3-Hexylthiophene). Nature 567, 511–515. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1036-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lai, X., Du, M., Meng, F., Li, G., Li, W., Kyaw, A. K. K., et al. (2019). High‐Performance Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cells Enhanced by Thickness Tuning of New Dopant‐Free Hole Transporting Layer. Small 15, 1904715. doi:10.1002/smll.201904715

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lai, X., Meng, F., Zhang, Q. Q., Wang, K., Li, G., Wen, Y., et al. (2019). A Bifunctional Saddle‐Shaped Small Molecule as a Dopant‐Free Hole Transporting Material and Interfacial Layer for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 3, 1900011. doi:10.1002/solr.201900011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, M. M., Teuscher, J., Miyasaka, T., Murakami, T. N., and Snaith, H. J. (2012). Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites. Science 338, 643–647. doi:10.1126/science.1228604

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, F., Deng, X., Qi, F., Li, Z., Liu, D., Shen, D., et al. (2020). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 20134. doi:10.1021/jacs.0c09845

CrossRef Full Text

Liu, F., Li, Q., and Li, Z. (2018). Hole-Transporting Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells. Asian J. Org. Chem. 7, 2182–2200. doi:10.1002/ajoc.201800398

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Z., Chang, J., Lin, Z., Zhou, L., Yang, Z., Chen, D., et al. (2018). High-Performance Planar Perovskite Solar Cells Using Low Temperature, Solution-Combustion-Based Nickel Oxide Hole Transporting Layer with Efficiency Exceeding 20%. Adv. Energ. Mater. 8, 1703432. doi:10.1002/aenm.201703432

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, F., Wang, Y., Wen, Y., Lai, X., Li, W., Kyaw, A. K. K., et al. (2020). Dopant‐Free and Green‐Solvent‐Processable Hole‐Transporting Materials for Highly Efficient Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 4, 2000327. doi:10.1002/solr.202000327

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, L., You, J., Guo, T.-F., and Yang, Y. (2016). Recent Advances in the Inverted Planar Structure of Perovskite Solar Cells. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 155–165. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pham, H. D., Hu, H., Feron, K., Manzhos, S., Wang, H., Lam, Y. M., et al. (2017). Thienylvinylenethienyl and Naphthalene Core Substituted with Triphenylamines-Highly Efficient Hole Transporting Materials and Their Comparative Study for Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 1, 1700105. doi:10.1002/solr.201700105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pham, H. D., Jain, S. M., Li, M., Manzhos, S., Feron, K., Pitchaimuthu, S., et al. (2019). Dopant-free Novel Hole-Transporting Materials Based on Quinacridone Dye for High-Performance and Humidity-Stable Mesoporous Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 7, 5315–5323. doi:10.1039/c8ta11361k

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rezaee, E., Liu, X., Hu, Q., Dong, L., Chen, Q., Pan, J.-H., et al. (2018). Dopant-Free Hole Transporting Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 2, 1800200. doi:10.1002/solr.201800200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saliba, M., Orlandi, S., Matsui, T., Aghazada, S., Cavazzini, M., Correa-Baena, J.-P., et al. (2016). A Molecularly Engineered Hole-Transporting Material for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Nat. Energ. 1, 15017. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2015.17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sheibani, E., Yang, L., and Zhang, J. (2020). Recent Advances in Organic Hole Transporting Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells. Sol. RRL 4, 2000461. doi:10.1002/solr.202000461

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Snaith, H. J., and Grätzel, M. (2006). Enhanced Charge Mobility in a Molecular Hole Transporter via Addition of Redox Inactive Ionic Dopant: Implication to Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 262114. doi:10.1063/1.2424552

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stranks, S. D., Eperon, G. E., Grancini, G., Menelaou, C., Alcocer, M. J. P., Leijtens, T., et al. (2013). Electron-Hole Diffusion Lengths Exceeding 1 Micrometer in an Organometal Trihalide Perovskite Absorber. Science 342, 341–344. doi:10.1126/science.1243982

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, X., Deng, X., Li, Z., Xiong, B., Zhong, C., Zhu, Z., et al. (2020). Dopant‐Free Crossconjugated Hole‐Transporting Polymers for Highly Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Sci. 7, 1903331. doi:10.1002/advs.201903331

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, X., Li, Z., Yu, X., Wu, X., Zhong, C., Liu, D., et al. (2021). Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells with Low Voltage Loss Achieved by a Pyridine‐Based Dopant‐Free Polymer Semiconductor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 7227–7233. doi:10.1002/anie.202016085

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, X., Zhao, D., and Li, Z. a. (2018). Recent Advances in the Design of Dopant-free Hole Transporting Materials for Highly Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Chin. Chem. Lett. 29, 219–231. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2017.09.038

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Urieta-Mora, J., García-Benito, I., Zimmermann, I., Aragó, J., Calbo, J., Grancini, G., et al. (2019). Saddle-like, π-conjugated, Cyclooctatetrathiophene-Based, Hole-Transporting Material for Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 6656–6663. doi:10.1039/c9tc00437h

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Duren, J. K. J., Yang, X., Loos, J., Bulle-Liewma, C. W. T., Seval, A. B., Hummelen, J. C., et al. (2004). Adv. Funct. Mater. 14, 425.

Wang, J., Xie, X., Cai, Y., He, L., Yuan, Y., Fei, W., et al. (2021). A Saddle-Shaped O-Tetraphenylene Based Molecular Semiconductor with a High Glass Transition Temperature for Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 9, 9927–9936. doi:10.1039/d0ta12591a

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Chen, W., Wang, L., Tu, B., Chen, T., Liu, B., et al. (2019). Dopant‐Free Small‐Molecule Hole‐Transporting Material for Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells with Efficiency Exceeding 21%. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902781. doi:10.1002/adma.201902781

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xing, G., Mathews, N., Sun, S., Lim, S. S., Lam, Y. M., Gratzel, M., et al. (2013). Long-Range Balanced Electron- and Hole-Transport Lengths in Organic-Inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science 342, 344–347. doi:10.1126/science.1243167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, X.-P., Li, S.-Y., Li, Y., and Peng, Q. (2021). Recent Progress in Organic Hole-Transporting Materials with 4-Anisylamino-Based End Caps for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Rare Met. 40, 1669–1690. doi:10.1007/s12598-020-01617-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Pham, N. D., Yao, D., Zhu, H., Yarlagadda, P., and Wang, H. (2018). Inorganic P-type Semiconductors and Carbon Materials Based Hole Transport Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells. Chin. Chem. Lett. 29, 1242–1250. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2018.05.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, X., Song, Z., Li, Z., and Tang, W. (2020). Toward Ideal Hole Transport Materials: a Review on Recent Progress in Dopant-free Hole Transport Materials for Fabricating Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Energ. Environ. Sci. 13, 4057–4086. doi:10.1039/d0ee02337j

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, Z., and Sun, L. (2018). Inorganic Hole-Transporting Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells. Small Methods 2, 1700280. doi:10.1002/smtd.201700280

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Zhou, X., Liu, C., Wang, X., and Xu, B. (2020). A Review on Solution‐Processable Dopant‐Free Small Molecules as Hole‐Transporting Materials for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Small Methods 4, 2000254. doi:10.1002/smtd.202000254

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, W., Wen, Z., and Gao, P. (2018). Less Is More: Dopant-free Hole Transporting Materials for High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energ. Mater. 8, 1702512. doi:10.1002/aenm.201702512

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar