Shengjie Jiang
Kaili Lin
Ming Cai- 1Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- 2National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai, China
- 3Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China
The prevalence of various diseases caused by bacteria has been increasing, and some traditional antibiotics have been reported to have varying degrees of resistance. ZnO nanomaterials (ZnO-NMs), due to their excellent broad-spectrum antibacterial properties, lasting antibacterial effects, and excellent biocompatibility, have quickly become the research focus of new antibacterial agents. While the narrow light response range of ZnO-NMs has limited the antibacterial performance to some extent and modifying it by various means to improve its response under visible light, such as doping metal/non-metal atoms, depositing noble metals and coupling carbon materials, which is a new research hotspot. Herein, the current mainstream claims about the antibacterial mechanisms and applications of ZnO-NMs are reviewed.
Introduction
Till now, the bacterial infection is still an urgent problem to be solved. The emergence and development of antibiotics have provided a simple and effective treatment for complex and severe diseases. However, the widespread production and abuse of antibiotics in recent decades have led to some “super bacteria” that have apparent resistance to antibiotics. Conventional antibiotic treatment has little effect on the increase of such bacteria.
Recently, nanotechnology, especially some nanomaterials with antibacterial activity such as metal nanoparticles, metal oxide nanoparticles, and carbon nanotubes, are considered as a new defense method against bacterial infections. The nanoscale surface effect and small size effect give these materials a unique antibacterial mechanism, mainly including three viewpoints: generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) or release metal ions to destroy bacterial DNA and protein; nanoparticles gather on the surface of the bacterial cell membrane and destroy the cell membrane (Qi et al., 2020) and interrupt transmembrane electron transfer (Li et al., 2008).
Compared with other antibacterial materials, as a traditional wide bandgap semiconductor, ZnO possesses excellent biocompatibility, safety, and long-term effectiveness, making it suitable for various biomedical applications (Liu et al., 2019). Moreover, the nanoscale gives it a unique antibacterial mechanism and significant antibacterial potential. ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) show significant bactericidal potential against various Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae (Luo et al., 2013). However, knowledge of the exact antibacterial mechanism of ZnO-NPs is still limited, and a correct understanding of its antibacterial mechanism is a prerequisite for effectively exerting its antibacterial potential. First, we review the latest research progress of the antibacterial mechanism of ZnO-NPs and the factors affecting its antibacterial activity. Then the applications of ZnO-NPs in antibacterial and antifungal are summarized.
Antibacterial Mechanism of ZnO-NPs
Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) is the most common and widely accepted mechanism for the antibacterial activity of ZnO-NPs (Kumar et al., 2017). Active oxygen is a type of single-electron reduction product of oxygen, such as superoxide anion O2−, hydroxyl radical OH− and hydrogen peroxide H2O2. ZnO is a wide bandgap semiconductor material. The electrons (e−) in its valence band transition under ultraviolet/visible light, leaving positively charged holes (H+). e− and H+ undergo a series of redox reactions with oxygen and water on the surface of ZnO particles to generate ROS with extreme chemical activity (Miao et al., 2017; Figure 1).
Figure 1. Mechanism of ROS production from ZnO-NPs and their bactericidal effect.
ROS can cut off the chemical bonds of bacteria's organic matter, to achieve the bactericidal effect. Among them, the negatively charged peroxide cannot pass through the cell membrane, OH− aggregates on the surface of bacterial cell membranes and causes cell membrane destruction, and H2O2 can penetrate the cell membrane, causing damage to the cell membrane and the destruction of DNA and protein in the membrane, which plays a bactericidal role (Kumar et al., 2017). However, it is worth noting that some studies have also found that ZnO also shows prominent antibacterial ability in the dark, and it is more significant when the bacterial concentration is low (Leung et al., 2016). In the study of Jeong et al. (2020) an array of ZnO nanorods was prepared by hydrothermal method and wrapped with an atomic layer of aluminum oxide to reduce the generation of active oxygen and the release of Zn2+. The results showed that in the dark, the mechanical damage to the cell membrane of E. coli accounted for 56.4% of the sterilization efficiency, while the chemical damage caused by the generation of reactive oxygen species and the release of Zn2+ accounted for only 37.8%. Hirota et al. (2010) also demonstrated that ZnO NPs have sustainable antibacterial activity against E. coli in the absence of light. These results indicate that in the absence of light, there may be additional mechanisms for generating active oxygen or other antibacterial mechanisms not related to light, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Two other antibacterial mechanisms of ZnO NPs.
Zn2+ Release Induced Damage
This theory holds that ZnO can slowly release Zn2+ in aqueous solution. Zn2+ can penetrate through the cell membrane and result in protein denaturation and loss of cell proliferation. Besides, Zn2+ can also destroy the electron transport system, leading to a cellular respiratory disorder. Joe et al. (2017) studied the antibacterial effects of various ZnO-NPs with different particle sizes and the number of oxygen vacancies in the dark state, and found that ZnO and Zn2+ adsorbed on the cell surface were the primary mode of action of antibacterial.
Although some studies attribute the antibacterial potential of ZnO to the release of Zn2+, no significant improvement in antibacterial effect was obtained with the increasing of Zn2+ concentration (Sawai, 2003). In the antibacterial experiment of Elena et al. (2016) on ZnO nanorod-modified graphene nanosheets (ZNGs) against Streptococcus mutans, the negligible dissolution of Zn2+ was observed, indicating high cell mortality in suspension is not related to Zn2 + release. It indicates that the release of Zn2+ should not be the primary mechanism of ZnO antibacterial.
Interaction of ZnO-NPs With the Cell Membrane
The Interaction of ZnO-NPs with bacteria and subsequent destruction of the bacterial surface has been proposed to explain the antibacterial activity of ZnO-NPs. This mainly includes membrane dysfunction caused by the accumulation of positively charged Zn2+ on the surface of the cell membrane and the disorder of energy metabolism of bacterial substances caused by the internalization of ZnO-NPs.
Membrane Dysfunction
As shown in Figure 2, some studies suggest that Zn2+ will be electrostatically attracted to the negatively charged bacterial cell membrane surface, thereby interfering with the charge balance on the cell membrane surface, resulting in severe cell deformation, and finally leading to bacterial lysis (Wang et al., 2014). Zhang et al. (2007) showed that ZnO-NPs caused damage to the cell membrane of E. coli, and further research found that this damage may be caused by the direct interaction between ZnO-NPs and the cell membrane.
Cell Internalization
Particles with sizes <10 nm can pass through the cell plasma membrane, called particle internalization (Kumar et al., 2017). Moreover, ZnO-NPs can be transported into the cytoplasm (Manna, 2012). In addition, the interaction between ZnO and bacterial cell membranes can enhance the permeability of cell membranes. Once the ZnO-NPs are internalized by the cells, it will inhibit or cut off the metabolic exchange of substances and energy between bacteria and environment, resulting in the death of bacteria (Zhang et al., 2007).
As a photocatalytic antibacterial agent, many researchers attribute their antibacterial mechanism to the cell damage mediated by ROS generated on the surface of ZnO after photocatalysis. However, some studies are showing that ZnO-NPs also have prominent antibacterial activity under dark conditions (Hirota et al., 2010; Leung et al., 2016). Other factors, including size, surface structure and morphology of ZnO-NPs also bring essential impacts on antibacterial activity (Padmavathy and Vijayaraghavan, 2008; Ansari et al., 2013; Ma et al., 2013; Qi et al., 2013, 2014, 2017) and also the bacteria type (Premanathan et al., 2011). Under different light conditions, the primary antibacterial mechanism of ZnO-NPs is different for different types of bacteria. Therefore, to study the primary antibacterial mechanism of ZnO-NPs under different circumstances and the synergistic effects with other mechanisms is the direction of future research.
Application Prospects of ZnO-NPs
ZnO-NPs is considered as a relatively safe metal oxide with the inherent ability to induce ROS production and lead to apoptosis, and possesses antibacterial, antifungal, and wound healing activities. We summarize the latest application progress of ZnO-NPs based on antibacterial and antifungal properties, including wound healing, antifungal activity, and prevention of caries.
Wound Healing
Anti-infection ability and skin regeneration are essential aspects of the wound healing process. The excellent antibacterial property of ZnO-NPs and epithelial stimulation effect of Zn2+ have been successfully applied in wound dressings (Lansdown et al., 2007). The traditionally used wound dressings of cellulose, chitosan and alginate cannot be used alone due to their low mechanical properties, which can be improved by addition ZnO-NPs (Alavi and Nokhodchi, 2020). The incorporation of ZnO-NPs into electrospinning collagen/chitosan nanofibers apparently improve antibacterial activity and accelerate wound healing process (Sun et al., 2019). The study of Hu et al. (2018) further suggested that ZnO-NPs showed better biocompatibility than that of silver NPs. These preliminary findings provide new drug candidates for the treatment of increasing antimicrobial resistance and infections.
Antifungal Ability
In addition to its excellent antibacterial activity, ZnO-NPs also have a significant inhibitory effect on fungus. It has been confirmed that ZnO-NPs can significantly inhibit the growth and reproduction of penicillium and mucor, and the morphologies of ZnO-NPs play critically role in inhibition activity (Zeng et al., 2016). In another study, the decoration of ZnO nanorods on graphene nanoplatelets (ZNGs) can affect the development of the primary virulence factor hyphae of fungus and the formation of biofilms, inducing significant fungal death (Graziella et al., 2018).
Prevent Caries
Streptococcus mutans is the leading cause of caries. During the killing of Streptococcus mutans, conventional antibiotics and fungicides also harm the healthy flora of the mouth and intestines (Jarvinen et al., 1993). So, agents characterized by a notable antibacterial activity and do not develop resistance are now highly requested. The ZnO-NPs has attracted more and more attentions due to their significant antibacterial properties. It is revealed that ZnO NPs could inhibit biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans (Eshed et al., 2012). The inhibition activity derived from the relevant mechanical damages exerted by ZNGs and showed a ZnO dose-dependent effect (Elena et al., 2016). Therefore, ZnO-NPs has a promising application as a nano-bactericide for dental pathogens, and maybe a very effective method for controlling the growth of Streptococcus mutans and the development of dental caries.
Conclusion
Herein, we summarize the main antibacterial mechanisms and application prospects of ZnO-NPs. The excellent biocompatibility, photochemical stability, and other characteristics of ZnO-NPs make it suitable for antibacterial. However, there is still a lack of understanding of its antimicrobial mechanism and toxicity issues. Therefore, researchers should focus on the exactly antibacterial mechanism of ZnO-NPs and adopt more advanced biotechnology to obtain more information on the mechanism. On the other hand, the microstructure of ZnO has a significant influence on its photocatalytic and antibacterial properties. We should develop environmentally friendly synthesis methods and surface modification strategies to improve the antibacterial property of ZnO-NPs. Besides, doping with other metals or non-metallic materials to enhance the selectivity for pathogenic microorganisms and reduce the toxic effect of tissue cells might exert the more extensive biomedical potentials for ZnO-NPs.
Author Contributions
SJ wrote the manuscript. KL and MC conceived the concept of this review. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871490), Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader (19XD1434500), and Two-Hundred Talent (20191819).
References
Alavi, M., and Nokhodchi, A. (2020). An overview on antimicrobial and wound healing properties of ZnO nanobiofilms, hydrogels, and bionanocomposites based on cellulose, chitosan, and alginate polymers. Carbohydr. Polym 227:115349. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115349
Ansari, S. A., Khan, M. M., Ansari, M. O., Lee, J., and Cho, M. H. (2013). Biogenic Synthesis, Photocatalytic, and Photoelectrochemical Performance of Ag–ZnO Nanocomposite. J. Physical Chem. C 117, 27023–27030. doi: 10.1021/jp410063p
Elena, Z., Chandrakanth, C., Giovanni, D. B., Maria, M., Giovanna, A., Paolo, B., et al. (2016). Zinc oxide nanorods-decorated graphene nanoplatelets: a promising antimicrobial agent against the cariogenic bacterium streptococcus mutans. Nanomaterials 6:179. doi: 10.3390/nano6100179
Eshed, M., Lellouche, J., Matalon, S., Gedanken, A., and Banin, E. (2012). Sonochemical coatings of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles inhibit streptococcus mutans biofilm formation on teeth model. Langmuir Acs J.f Surf. Colloids 28, 12288–12295. doi: 10.1021/la301432a
Graziella, F., Maria, G., De Caris, G., and Trillò, D. C. (2018). Anti-candidal activity and in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of graphene nanoplatelets decorated with zinc oxide. Nanorods. 8:E752. doi: 10.3390/nano8100752
Hirota, K., Sugimoto, M., Kato, M., Tsukagoshi, K., Tanigawa, T., and Sugimoto, H. (2010). Preparation of zinc oxide ceramics with a sustainable antibacterial activity under dark conditions. Ceramics Intern. 36, 497–506. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2009.09.026
Hu, M., Li, C., Li, X., Zhou, M., Sun, J., Sheng, F., et al. (2018). Zinc oxide/silver bimetallic nanoencapsulated in PVP/PCL nanofibres for improved antibacterial activity. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 46, 1248–1257. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2017.1366339
Jarvinen, H., Tenovuo, J., and Huovinen, P. (1993). In vitro susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to chlorhexidine and six other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 37, 1158–1159. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.5.1158
Jeong, E., Ul Kim, C., Byun, J., Lee, J., Kim, H. E., Kim, E. J., et al. (2020). Quantitative evaluation of the antibacterial factors of ZnO nanorod arrays under dark conditions: physical and chemical effects on Escherichia coil inactivation. Sci. Total Environ. 712, 136574. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136574
Joe, A., Park, S. H., Shim, K. D., Kim, D. J., Jhee, K. H., Lee, H. W., et al. (2017). Antibacterial mechanism of ZnO nanoparticles under dark conditions. J. Indus. Eng. Chem. 45, 430–439. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.10.013
Kumar, R., Umar, A., Kumar, G., and Nalwa, H. S. (2017). Antimicrobial properties of ZnO nanomaterials: a review. Ceramics Intern. 43, 3940–3961. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.062
Lansdown, A. B. G., Mirastschijski, U., Stubbs, N., Scanlon, E., and Agren, M. S. (2007). Zinc in wound healing: Theoretical, experimental, and clinical aspects. Wound Repair Regen. 15, 2–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00179.x
Leung, Y. H., Xu, X., Ma, A. P. Y., Liu, F., Ng, A. M. C., Shen, Z., et al. (2016). Toxicity of ZnO and TiO2 to Escherichia coli cells. Sci. Rep 6:35243. doi: 10.1038/srep35243
Li, Q., Mahendra, S., Lyon, D. Y., Brunet, L., Liga, M. V., Li, D., et al. (2008). Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications. Water Res. 42, 4591–4602. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.015
Liu, Y., Wang, R., Li, N., Liu, M., and Zhang, Q. (2019). Preparation of zinc oxide mesocrystal filler and its properties as dental composite resin. J. Inorganic Mat. 10, 1077–1084. doi: 10.15541/jim20180598
Luo, Z., Wu, Q., Xue, J., and Ding, Y. (2013). Selectively enhanced antibacterial effects and ultraviolet activation of antibiotics with ZnO nanorods against Escherichia Coli. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 9, 69–76. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2013.1472
Ma, J., Liu, J., Bao, Y., Zhu, Z., Wang, X., and Zhang, J. (2013). Synthesis of large-scale uniform mulberry-like ZnO particles with microwave hydrothermal method and its antibacterial property. Ceramics Intern. 39, 2803–2810. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.09.049
Manna, A. C. (2012). Synthesis, Characterization, and Antimicrobial Activity of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24428-5_5
Miao, L. G., Shi, B. M., Stanislaw, N., Mu, C. M., and Qi, K. Z. (2017). Facile synthesis of hierarchical ZnO microstructures with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Mat. Sci. Poland 35, 45–49. doi: 10.1515/msp-2017-0007
Padmavathy, N., and Vijayaraghavan, R. (2008). Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles-an antimicrobial study. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mat. 9:035004. doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/9/3/035004
Premanathan, M., Karthikeyan, K., Jeyasubramanian, K., and Manivannan, G. (2011). Selective toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles toward Gram-positive bacteria and cancer cells by apoptosis through lipid peroxidation. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 7, 184–192. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2010.10.001
Qi, K., Qin, Q., Duan, X., Wang, G., Wu, L., and Zheng, W. (2014). Geometric matching principle for adsorption selectivity of ionic liquids: a simple method into the fascinating world of shape-controlled chemistry. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 9012–9017. doi: 10.1002/chem.201400409
Qi, K., Xing, X., Zada, A., Li, M., Wang, Q., Liu, S., et al. (2020). Transition metal doped ZnO nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial performances: experimental and DFT studies. Ceramics Intern. 46, 1494–1502. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.116
Qi, K., Yang, J., Fu, J., Wang, G., Zhu, L., Liu, G., et al. (2013). Morphology-controllable ZnO rings: ionic liquid-assisted hydrothermal synthesis, growth mechanism and photoluminescence properties. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 15, 6729–6735. doi: 10.1039/c3ce27007f
Qi, K., Cheng, B., Yu, J., and Ho, W. (2017). Review on the improvement of the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of ZnO. J. Alloys Comp. 727, 792–820. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.142
Sawai, J. (2003). Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO, MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay. J. Microbiol. Methods 54, 177–182. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00037-X
Sun, L., Han, J., Liu, Z., Wei, S., Su, X., and Zhang, G. (2019). The facile fabrication of wound compatible anti-microbial nanoparticles encapsulated Collagenous Chitosan matrices for effective inhibition of poly-microbial infections and wound repairing in burn injury care: exhaustive in vivo evaluations. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 197:111539. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111539
Wang, Y. W., Cao, A., Jiang, Y., Zhang, X., and Wang, H. (2014). Superior antibacterial activity of ZnO/graphene oxide composites originated from high zinc concentration localized around bacteria. Acs Appl. Mat. Interf. 6, 2791–2798. doi: 10.1021/am4053317
Zeng, X., Zhang, F., He, N., Zhang, B., Liu, X., and Li, X. (2016). ZnO Nanoparticles of Different Shapes and Their Antimycotic Property Against Penicillium and Mucor. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 8, 688–694. doi: 10.1166/nnl.2016.2206
Keywords: ZnO nanomaterials, antibacterial activity, mechanism, applications, review
Citation: Jiang S, Lin K and Cai M (2020) ZnO Nanomaterials: Current Advancements in Antibacterial Mechanisms and Applications. Front. Chem. 8:580. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00580
Received: 15 April 2020; Accepted: 05 June 2020;
Published: 21 July 2020.
Edited by:
Kezhen Qi, Shenyang Normal University, ChinaReviewed by:
Shu-Yuan Liu, Shenyang Medical College, ChinaYuanyuan Wang, Peking University Hospital of Stomatology, China
Copyright © 2020 Jiang, Lin and Cai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kaili Lin, lklecnu@aliyun.com; Ming Cai, zidanecm500@126.com