Carolina Otero1
Alexander Carreño2*
Rubén Polanco3
Felipe M. Llancalahuen1
Ramiro Arratia-Pérez2
Manuel Gacitúa4
Juan A. Fuentes5*- 1Facultad de Medicina, Escuela de Química y Farmacia, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- 2Center for Applied Nanosciences (CANS), Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- 3Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Centro de Biotecnología Vegetal, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
- 4Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH), Santiago, Chile
- 5Laboratorio de Genética y Patogénesis Bacteriana, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
Re(I) complexes have exposed highly suitable properties for cellular imaging (especially for fluorescent microscopy) such as low cytotoxicity, good cellular uptake, and differential staining. These features can be modulated or tuned by modifying the ligands surrounding the metal core. However, most of Re(I)-based complexes have been tested for non-walled cells, such as epithelial cells. In this context, it has been proposed that Re(I) complexes are inefficient to stain walled cells (i.e., cells protected by a rigid cell wall, such as bacteria and fungi), presumably due to this physical barrier hampering cellular uptake. More recently, a series of studies have been published showing that a suitable combination of ligands is useful for obtaining Re(I)-based complexes able to stain walled cells. This review summarizes the main characteristics of different fluorophores used in bioimage, remarking the advantages of d6-based complexes, and focusing on Re(I) complexes. In addition, we explored different structural features of these complexes that allow for obtaining fluorophores especially designed for walled cells (bacteria and fungi), with especial emphasis on the ligand choice. Since many pathogens correspond to bacteria and fungi (yeasts and molds), and considering that these organisms have been increasingly used in several biotechnological applications, development of new tools for their study, such as the design of new fluorophores, is fundamental and attractive.
Cell Imaging Methods
Cell imaging has become a powerful tool to reveal particular biological structures and explore molecular mechanisms, unraveling dynamics, and functions of many different cellular processes (Rabuka et al., 2008; Hensle and Blum, 2013; Hananya et al., 2016; Majumder et al., 2016; Cui et al., 2017; Yoshimura, 2018). Accordingly, development of diverse transmitted light microscopy approaches, including fluorescence microscopy, is increasingly contributing to improve this technique (Roeffaers et al., 2008; Hauser et al., 2017). Fluorescence microscopy has been considered to be one of the most important advances to observe biological structures, but also to explore physiological processes or even characterize new compartments (Phimphivong and Saavedra, 1998; Bullok et al., 2002; Heintzmann and Huser, 2017). In this sense, research about new, improved fluorescent indicators (simply known as fluorophores) clearly constitutes a new challenge (Frederiksen et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2017; Bourassa et al., 2018).
Fluorescence microscopy relies upon the use of fluorescent agents, or those parts of a sample that are naturally emissive, to generate a detectable emitted light signal upon excitation (Borman, 2010; Vendrell et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2015; Tian et al., 2017). This allows for greater contrast between sections of the specimen and greater signal-to-noise ratios than conventional microscopy, which uses detection of reflected or transmitted light (Cheng et al., 2017; Gao et al., 2017; More et al., 2018).
Nevertheless, overall limitations of fluorescence microscopy, as an imaging technique, include low resolution to approximately half the wavelength of the light involved in the experiment, and the limited depth of tissue penetration of the light used. This limits visible light fluorescence microscopy to sample depths of a few millimeters and near IR microscopy to a few centimeters (Li et al., 2017; Taylor et al., 2018). For these reasons, it is necessary to develop new and improved luminescent fluorophores, suitable to be used with fluorescence microscopy.
Luminescent Markers for Fluorescence Microscopy
In fluorescence microscopy, image quality depends largely on the physicochemical properties of the luminescent marker. For these reasons, markers should be carefully chosen to fulfill the requirements of a particular technique (Shaner, 2014). It has been considered that a good luminescent marker for imaging applications must exhibit some desirable properties, such as good stability and solubility in aqueous solvents (including buffer and culture media); low cytotoxicity, including low phototoxicity (i.e., toxicity generated upon light exposure) (Haas et al., 2014); differential affinity (i.e., specificity) for certain cell structures; and an efficient cellular uptake, hopefully in absence of other chemical or physical agents that artificially increase membrane permeability (Fernandez-Moreira et al., 2010). Other photophysical properties are also important. Accordingly, luminescent fluorophores must exhibit an efficient sample penetration to create high quality images. For instance, fluorophores with red shifted emission and excitation profiles, particularly in the near-infrared region, have shown a suitable penetration for biological systems (Zhao et al., 2014). In addition, luminescent markers should be easily distinguishable from the background, showing high brightness. In this context, background autofluorescence from biological systems generally reduce resolution of a luminescent marker. Since autofluorescence, produced by DNA, NADPH, and other biomolecules, normally presents small Stokes shift (Santoro et al., 2012; Balasubramaniam et al., 2015; Coda et al., 2015), it is desirable that luminescent markers present large Stokes shift, a property that contributes to preventing self-quenching (i.e., dimmer images) (Moriarty et al., 2014). Finally, markers must also show a relatively long luminescent lifetime (τ, from ~102 to 106 ms), a useful feature that also contributes to distinguish the desired signal from the biological system, which shows mostly short-lived autofluorescence (~10 ns). Thus, since different cellular structures present different τ with respect to autofluorescence, it is possible to remove this autofluorescence background or even use it to provide further information through fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy/mapping (FLIM) (Coda et al., 2015).
At present, a wide variety of fluorophores for bioimaging applications have been reported. Among these, genetically encoded fluorescent proteins (FPs) (Enterina et al., 2015); organic dyes; quantum dots (Baker, 2010; Doane and Burda, 2012); and metal-based systems (Shang et al., 2011; Echeverría et al., 2012) are the most important.
Fluorescent Proteins (FPs)
A wide variety of fluorescent proteins have been engineered, with several adaptations and characteristics to suit diverse applications, including presentation in different colors, from blue to far-red. FPs can be genetically encoded, a major advantage over other systems, thereby allowing direct labeling of many proteins in a living cell; albeit this advantage must be contrasted against poor quantum yield, low photon yield (i.e., FPs exhibit poor brightness), and a large size that impairs cellular uptake when they are heterologously produced, particularly in prokaryotic cells (bacteria) and eukaryotic walled cells such as yeasts or molds (Baird et al., 2000; Kubitscheck et al., 2000; Shaner et al., 2004). Moreover, not all FPs are stable; some of them exhibiting high degradation rates (Haas et al., 2014). Even more so, several chimeric proteins containing an FP moiety lack their original functions and/or do not exhibit luminescence due to inappropriate protein folding (Stepanenko et al., 2013). Another consideration when using FPs is the maturation time, i.e., time necessary to properly fold and emission. Typical maturation times are around 40 min, but depending on pH, temperature, and the specific FP, some may take several hours to mature (Baird et al., 2000; Shaner et al., 2004; Chudakov et al., 2010). Moreover, it is important to remark that the chromophore formation step requires the presence of oxygen in many FPs (including green fluorescence protein GFP), making these markers incompatible with obligate anaerobes (Haas et al., 2014). Furthermore, it is important to consider that the use of FPs is restricted to cellular systems that have well-established transformation protocols or availability of appropriate expression vectors.
Organic Molecules
Most fluorophores used in confocal microscopy are organic molecules, normally a series of fused, heterocyclic rings (Wood, 1994). While extinction coefficients and quantum yield of many of these fluorophores are high, they exhibit small Stokes shift, and short luminescence lifetime compared to metal-based systems (see below). Unlike FPs, organic dyes are not genetically encodable, consequently they must be incorporated into the cell through the plasma membrane by diffusion, endocytosis or microinjection. Nevertheless, not all organic dyes can permeate cell membranes. For instance, rhodamine dyes can poorly diffuse across bacterial membranes, while sulfonated cyanine dyes are completely unable to enter into bacterial cells (Fernandez-Suarez and Ting, 2008). This is an especially critical point since endocytosis and microinjection are not available for prokaryotic cells. Instead, membrane permeabilization is normally used; albeit this procedure can produce misleading or confusing alterations in data (artifacts) due to the presence of organic solvents affecting membranes and other cell structures (Sochacki et al., 2011). In addition, considering that organic dyes usually bind non-specifically in the cell, most staining is limited regarding their specificity, needing several washing steps to remove excess, unbound dye from the cell (Fernandez-Suarez and Ting, 2008).
Quantum Dots
Quantum dots have also been used for fluorescence microscopy, although they are much less common in applications due to their usual large size, requirement for surface passivation, and unpredictable blinking properties (Antelman et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Mutavdzic et al., 2011; Ritchie et al., 2013). As well as with exogenous proteins and organic dyes, many quantum dots are difficult to be incorporated into cells, restricting their use to the outer membrane and cell surface in prokaryotic cells (Chalmers et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011; Ritchie et al., 2013). Although quantum dots commonly exhibit much longer photobleaching lifetimes compared to FPs, the presence of blinking constitutes a clear disadvantage to obtain high quality images (Michalet et al., 2005; Mahler et al., 2008; Omogo et al., 2016; Osborne and Fisher, 2016). Furthermore, another important disadvantage is the high toxicity of the semiconducting materials used in the fabrication of quantum dots like CdQ (Q = Se or Te) (Khalili Fard et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016; Silva et al., 2016). To address this issue, numerous studies have explored the development of non-toxic quantum dots. Nevertheless, only less-toxic quantum dots have been produced (Das and Snee, 2016). For that reason, they must be coated with organic molecules, a complex, and expensive procedure, to render them soluble and biocompatible by preventing the leaching of toxic ions (Fernandez-Moreira et al., 2010). Even though extinction coefficients and quantum yield of many quantum dots are high, these fluorophores exhibit normally smaller Stokes shift, shorter luminescence lifetime and higher susceptibility to photobleaching compared with metal-based systems (see below).
Metal-Based Systems
Metal-based systems are comparatively smaller (1–2 nm), and often possess excellent optical properties such as high brightness, narrow emission bands, multiple emission wavelengths, emission tunability, long fluorescence lifetime, large Stokes shift, resistance to photobleaching, and high stability, compared with other fluorophores (Baird et al., 2000; Shaner et al., 2004; Ranjan et al., 2015). Due to all these properties, especially small size, the position of these dyes in a sample can be determined with high precision, a useful feature to perform super-resolution microscopy (Thompson et al., 2002; Agrawal et al., 2013; Haas et al., 2014). Some complexes of certain 4f elements (i.e., lanthanides) show extremely long luminescence lifetime (106 ns) and, in some cases, they emit in the NIR region of the spectrum, which are features that make them attractive targets for applications in fluorescence microscopy (Song et al., 2008; Montgomery et al., 2009; Amoroso and Pope, 2015). Despite all these promising advantages, the presence of an additional chromophore must be incorporated into the complex (i.e., an antenna) to allow sufficient absorption and subsequent transfer of energy to the lanthanide; in other words, lanthanide ions are difficult to excite (Liu et al., 2013). In addition, lanthanide complexes must exhibit high stability to avoid the release of highly toxic lanthanide ions, a process demanding the synthesis of intricate macrocyclic ligands (Montgomery et al., 2009). Besides 4f elements (lanthanides), d6 metal-based systems, in combination with a relatively high amount of ligand-field dinitrogenated and/or organometallic ligands, present attractive features to be used as fluorophore for applications in fluorescence microscopy.
d6 Metal-Based Complexes
Over the last few years, luminescent d6 complexes have attracted considerable interest for applications in microscopy as synthetic fluorescent dyes, mainly due to their attractive photophysical properties (Haas and Franz, 2009; Patra and Gasser, 2012). Typical d6 complexes of Re(I), Ru(II), Os(II), and Ir(III) (Lee et al., 2017), in combination of a relatively high diversity of ligands (e.g., ruthenium trisbipyridyls, rhenium fac tricarbonyl polypyridyls, osmium bipyridyl, and iridium cyclometallates complexes), have been used as fluorophores for fluorescent microscopy and related applications (Table 1) (Virel et al., 2009; Langdon-Jones et al., 2014; You et al., 2014; Gupta et al., 2016). In general, d6 complexes share common features making them suitable for microscopy applications. For instance, as well as luminescent lanthanide complexes, d6 complexes have large Stokes shift (hundreds of nm), which allow clear differentiation between autofluorescence and signal luminescence; long excited-state lifetimes, which can permit elimination of short-lived autofluorescence (ns) (Fernandez-Moreira et al., 2010; Li et al., 2011); enhanced photostability (leading to lower photobleaching) (Stufkens and Vlcek, 1998; Lowry et al., 2004); high chemical stability; and cellular uptake, at least for eukaryotic non-walled cells (Haas and Franz, 2009; Langdon-Jones et al., 2014).
Table 1. Examples of d6 complexes used as fluorophores in biological applications.
Photophysical properties of d6 complexes depend directly on the nature of the whole molecule itself, with an emission explained by the triplet metal-to-ligand-charge-transfer (3MLCT) as the most important in most molecules (Bonello et al., 2014). 3MLCT involves excitation by a photo-induced electron transfer from metal-based orbital (i.e., from Re, Ru, Ir) to a conjugated π-system normally located on an aromatic heterocyclic ligand (often a dinitrogenated ligand) (Long and Wong, 2015). Since excited d6 metal-based orbitals must transfer electrons to emit light, d6 complexes usually include high-field ancillary ligands (i.e., π acceptors) in order to improve charge transfer (Mitoraj and Michalak, 2010; Lambic et al., 2018; Munoz-Osses et al., 2018). For these reasons, due to low oxidation state of metals [i.e., Re(I), Ru(II), Ir(III)], highly conjugated ligands that can easily accept electronic density are desirable for the development of good fluorescent probes (Cameron et al., 2018; Isik Buyukeksi et al., 2018; Zanoni et al., 2018). In this sense, it is possible to modulate both excitation and emission wavelengths of d6 complexes according to the nature of the ligand involved in charge transfer. Thus, the choice of the ligand can directly affect the band gap, impacting, in turn, in the emitting light and remarking the possibility to design complexes with particular luminescent properties (Fernandez-Moreira et al., 2010; Atoini et al., 2017; Ward et al., 2018). All these features contribute to easy excitation and increased quantum yield of d6 complexes, in comparison with lanthanide complexes, producing brighter images at lower concentrations and few cytotoxicity, without the need of antennae (Fernandez-Moreira et al., 2010; Thorp-Greenwood, 2012; Thorp-Greenwood et al., 2012).
Besides good luminescent properties, d6 complexes must exhibit other additional properties to be suitable for imaging applications in biology. Among these properties, cellular uptake (e.g., by modulating lipophilicity), low cytotoxicity, and specific intracellular localization are crucial, thereby engineering of d6 complexes by the presence of different ligands must be explored in order to obtain improved luminescent fluorophores. Since emission comes mainly from the charge transfer between the metal and ligand, exhibiting sensitivity to their electronic levels (Lowry et al., 2004), modifications of the ligands will allow for the designing of new fluorophores with different photophysical properties, but also fluorophores that could be conjugated to other biomolecules (e.g., antibodies) to allow localization-control of the sample.
Re(I) Tricarbonyl Complexes
As stated, properties exhibited by d6 complexes make them attractive for bioimaging applications using fluorescence microscopy (Thorp-Greenwood and Coogan, 2011; Morais et al., 2012). d6-based complexes have shown remarkable properties in cellular imaging, especially with epithelial cells, showing specific intracellular localization patterns (Amoroso et al., 2007; Botchway et al., 2008; Li et al., 2011). In particular, Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes have luminescent properties that have long been postulated, but have only been demonstrated relatively recently as being useful as in vivo probes (Amoroso et al., 2007, 2008).
In the first fluorescence studies, Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes with bisquinoline (bqi) as substituted trinitrogenated ligand were conjugated to fMLF, a small peptide-based targeting agent used to specifically recognize the formyl peptide receptor (FPR) found in neutrophils (Stephenson et al., 2004), producing a fac-[Re(CO)3(bqi)fMLF]+ complex. At low temperatures, fluorescent complexes were located at the same position than the fluorescein-labeled probe, showing that the presence of Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes did not affect neither the recognizing nor localization of fMLF receptor (Stephenson et al., 2004). Although Re(I) bqi complexes were the first rhenium species reported as fluorophores for cell imaging, more recent studies demonstrated that dinitrogenated complexes such as 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), or derivatives, require longer wavelength excitation compared with bqi (i.e., trinitrogenated) ligands, producing low cellular damage but good penetration (Maggioni et al., 2012). In this sense, facial isomers of type fac-[Re(CO)3(N,N)L]n (where n is 0, +,or -), preferably monocationic complexes where N,N corresponds to a substituted dinitrogenated ligand and L is the ancillary ligand (Figure 1), have been extensively studied due to their photophysical attributes, especially with non-walled eukaryotic cells (Langdon-Jones et al., 2014; North et al., 2015). The relatively lipophilic nature of fac-[Re(CO)3(N,N)L]n complexes (e.g., they can be dissolved in DMSO) seems also suitable for cell imaging, showing that the choice of the dinitrogenated ligand modulates some photophysical properties (e.g., excitation and emission ranges) (Amoroso et al., 2007), but also some properties as biomarkers (Carreño et al., 2017a).
Figure 1. Structural scheme of Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes and their different functional groups [i.e., substituted dinitrogenated ligand (N, N); ancillary ligand (L)]. Some examples of (N, N) ligands include (1) 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bpy (dmb); (2) 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy); (3) 1,10-phenanthroline (phen); (4) 5,6-dione-1,10-phenanthroline (dione). Some examples of ancillary ligands (L) include (1) halogens; (2) 3-chloromethylpyridyl; (3) (E)-2-{[(3-aminopyridin-4-yl)imino]-methyl}-4,6-di-tert-butyl-phenol (a pyridine Schiff base harboring an intramolecular hydrogen bond) (Carreño et al., 2014, 2015a,b, 2017a).
Most common Re(I) luminescent markers are based on the fac-[Re(CO)3(bpy)L]+ core, which have been modified in order to develop imaging and sensing agents with diverse properties. These complexes are usually synthesized from parent pentacarbonyl halides, [Re(CO)5X] (X = Cl/Br), to obtain neutral tricarbonyl dinitrogenated halides (e.g., fac-[Re(CO)3(bpy)X]) (Kurz et al., 2006; Ranasinghe et al., 2016). In this case, it is important to include a reflux step under an inert atmosphere for 2–3 h (Kurz et al., 2006; Ranasinghe et al., 2016). Nevertheless, more recently a synthesis procedure has been reported that requires only stirring without the need of reflux and inert atmosphere, with a high yield and purity, in only 15–30 min (Carreño et al., 2015b, 2017a). After the synthesis of neutral fac-[Re(CO)3(bpy)X, the halide (i.e., X) can be substituted by the required ancillary ligand (L) to produce the final complexes (i.e., fac-[Re(CO)3(bpy)L](0, +, or−)), where total charge depends on the nature of the ancillary ligand L (Amoroso et al., 2008; Thorp-Greenwood et al., 2012; Carreño et al., 2016; Carreño et al., 2017a).
Thus, as discussed before, it has been demonstrated that the Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes can be engineered by choosing the ancillary ligand, in order to modulate some properties related to bioimage, including wavelength emission, subcellular localization, and/or cellular uptake. The ancillary ligand can determine lipophilicity, but also other properties such as global charge of the Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes. For example, there are differences in neutral, cationic and anionic forms of Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes. Neutral complexes (e.g., fac-[Re(CO)3(N,N)L], where L is a halogen as substituent) normally exhibit relatively low quantum yield and short lifetime, along with relatively low cellular uptake (Fernandez-Moreira et al., 2010; Carreño et al., 2019). By contrast, cationic fac-[Re(CO)3(bpy)L)]+ complexes normally present more desirable photophysical properties, including increased lifetime and better quantum yield. In addition, several Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes can be up taken by non-walled eukaryotic cells by passive diffusion, facilitating the staining procedure. Specifically, some cationic lipophilic complexes, e.g., fac-[Re(CO)3(bpy)(Py-CH2OCO(CH2)nCH3)]+ (Py = pyridine; n = 6, 12, 16), co-localize in internal membranes of organelles, or other lipophilic cytoplasmic structures (Stufkens and Vlcek, 1998; Coogan and Fernandez-Moreira, 2014). On the other hand, anionic complexes (e.g., fac-[Re(CO)3((SO3-phenyl)2-phen)(Py-R)]−(Py: pyridine; R: H, CH2OH, CH2OCOC13H27) accumulate only on the outer face of the plasma membrane, or show no cellular uptake at all despite the presence of very lipophilic substituents (Amoroso et al., 2007), showing that a suitable combination of both the dinitrogenated and the ancillary ligand must be performed in order to develop an adequate biomarker.
Besides contributing to the global charge of the complex, ancillary ligands can also modulate other properties, showing this moiety was not as irrelevant, as previously suggested (Sacksteder et al., 1990). For instance, a group of fac-[Re(CO)3(N,N)L]+ (where N,N is bpy or phen derivatives) complexes, where L corresponds to a highly lipophilic series including esters of 3-hydroxymethylpyridine, i.e., Py-3-CH2O2CR′ (Py = pyridine; R′ = octyl, merystyl, or steryl), were tested as biomarkers in both liposomes and Spironucleus vortens, a unicellular eukaryotic fish parasite related to Giardia spp. (Amoroso et al., 2007). Results showed that lipophilic fac-[Re(CO)3(subs-bpy)L]+ complexes (where subs-bpy is a substituted bpy, and L is a highly hydrophobic ligand) were associated to cell membranes, internal membranes of organelles and cell debris. Interestingly, the neutral compound fac-[Re(CO)3(phen)Cl] was mainly found in aqueous fractions and not in membranes, suggesting that high lipophilicity and/or a cationic nature are required for an efficient uptake and staining, as stated above (Amoroso et al., 2007). Thus, apparently, the use of lipophilic complexes could lead to an improved luminescent staining in cells. Nevertheless, highly lipophilic fac-[Re(CO)3(N,N)L]+ exhibit cytotoxicity, mainly due to membrane disruption that ultimately led to cell lysis. In this sense, it has been stated that fac-[Re(CO)3(N,N)L]+ complexes are not toxic per se, but toxicity can be a problem depending on the chosen ancillary ligand (L) (Amoroso et al., 2007; Hallett et al., 2018), indicating that experimental research is necessary to establish biocompatibility in each case. Besides cytotoxicity, ancillary ligands can also modify other properties in Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes involved in bioimaging. In this regard, it was stated that chloride used as an ancillary ligand promotes high cell-depending photobleaching when used in these complexes (Amoroso et al., 2007). Nevertheless, other similar neutral Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes harboring bromide as ancillary ligand, instead of chloride, seem to be resistant to photobleaching, exhibiting an efficient stain of different cell models and reinforcing the need of an experimental approach in each case to assess the complexes as biomarkers (Carreño et al., 2017a).
Ligands can also modify other properties with potential use in biological applications. For instance, alkoxy bridged binuclear Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes containing long alkyl chains with photoisomerizable 4-(1-naphthylvinyl) pyridine ligand (1,4-NVP) enhance its fluorescent emission in the presence of β-amyloid fibrils, exhibiting a potential in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis (Sathish et al., 2014), remarking an eventual use of Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes as novel differential probes and opening new windows in medical approaches.
Re(I)-Based Fluorophores for Walled Cells
As stated above, several fluorophores have been extensively studied regarding their use for non-walled cells (e.g., cell lines, usually epithelial cells). However, in the last years, the use of Re(I)-based fluorophores in walled cells, in particular bacteria and fungi, have been explored. Many pathogens correspond to bacteria and fungi (yeasts and molds). In addition, these organisms have been increasingly used in innumerable biotechnological applications, underlining the importance of developing new tools for their study, such as the design of new fluorophores. Nevertheless, development of Re(I)-based fluorophores for walled cells has encountered some troubles. Both bacteria and fungi possess a rigid structure found in their respective envelop, called cell wall (Sanz et al., 2017; Caveney et al., 2018). The presence of the cell wall could impair incorporation of foreign molecules, including Re(I)-based complexes, as previously proposed (Amoroso et al., 2007, 2008). According to our experience, the development of Re(I)-based fluorophores for walled cells is possible, but requires systematic experimentation to find suitable ligands surrounding the metallic core. Although much of the evidence showing adequate Re(I)-based fluorophores for walled cells is empirical, we can list some common features that favor their use for these kind of cells.
With respect to substitutions in the denitrogenated ligand in fac-Re(I)(CO)3(N,N)X complexes (where N,N is a denitrogenated ligand and X is a halide), apparently larger substituents seem to impair the properties as fluorophores in yeasts, showing, for instance, that fac-Re(I)(CO)3(2,2′-bpy)Br exhibit better staining than fac-Re(I)(CO)3(4,4′-diethanoate-2,2′-bpy)Br (Carreño et al., 2017a). Interestingly, it has been stated that some dinitrogenated ligands alone (e.g., 1,10-phenanthroline or derivatives) are highly cytotoxic toward different cell types, including walled cells such yeasts and bacteria (Coyle et al., 2003; Roy et al., 2008; Kaplanis et al., 2014; Carreño et al., 2019). Nevertheless, it has been shown that, when these dinitrogenated ligands are coordinated through their two nitrogens with the metal, cytotoxicity is strongly diminished (Carreño et al., 2017a; Carreño et al., 2019). Low cytotoxicity is fundamental for fluorophores, indicating that the most common dinitrogenated ligands, such as 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives, can be used to develop luminescent fluorophores for walled cells.
Regarding the total charge, a cationic nature of fac-[Re(CO)3(2,2′-bpy)L)]+ complexes is desirable for the generation of luminescent fluorophores, even for walled cells, due to advantageous photophysical properties and improved uptake (Coogan and Fernandez-Moreira, 2014; Carreño et al., 2016, 2017a; Carreño et al., 2019; Carreño et al., 2019a). This is apparently true for other d6-based complexes used to stain walled cells. For instance, prototypical cis-Ru(II)(N,N) complexes (where N,N is a dinitrogenated ligand) were reported to be useful to stain yeasts (Carreño et al., 2019b). However, it is necessary to be cautious since highly charged cationic d6-based complexes are apparently unable to penetrate walled cells. This is the case for ruthenium red ([(NH3)5Ru(II)–O–Ru(II)(NH3)4–O–Ru(II)(NH3)5]6+), used as a dense material to stain extracellular components in yeasts, a compound that is unable to penetrate cells (Farrington and Sannes, 2015).
As stated above, the choice of both the dinitrogenated ligand and the total charge of the complex are important to generate a suitable fluorophores for walled cells. In this context, the ancillary ligand also plays a relevant role, albeit the choice of the right ligand is not trivial. Amoroso et al. tested different ancillary ligands in fac-Re(I)(CO)3(2,2′-bpy)L+, where L is a meta-substituted pyridine with ester aliphatic chains (from 6 to 16 carbons), and found that these complexes were toxic for different cell kinds, inducing cell disruption and affecting the image obtained by fluorescence microscopy (Amoroso et al., 2007). Later, Amoroso et al. explored a different ancillary ligand using the same fac-Re(I)(CO)3(2,2′-bpy)L+ core, but using 3-chloromethylpyridyl instead of meta-substituted pyridine with ester aliphatic chains (from 6 to 16 carbons) as L. Although these new complexes were significantly less toxic than complexes harboring long aliphatic chains, producing better images, the use of 3-chloromethylpyridyl as ancillary ligand seems to be useful only for non-walled cells (i.e., breast cancer cell line). By contrast, when this same complex was used to stain yeasts, poor results were obtained, showing only a small proportion of cells that retained the fluorophore (Amoroso et al., 2008). These findings remark the fact that, although the cationic nature has been proposed as being important for the uptake by non-walled cells (Langdon-Jones et al., 2014), it is also necessary to find suitable ancillary ligands to allow uptake by walled cells. In this way, it has been reported that one particular kind of pyridine Schiff base harboring an intramolecular hydrogen bond is useful to act as ancillary ligands to generate Re(I) complexes useful to stain walled cells (Carreño et al., 2015b, 2016, 2017a, 2019a). Schiff bases are aldehyde- or ketone-like compounds, where the carbonyl group is replaced by an azomethine (–C=N–) group (Da Silva et al., 2011). In general, Schiff bases have been used for diverse applications, including antimicrobial compounds, due to their high cytotoxicity against bacteria or fungi (Jarrahpour et al., 2007; Justin Dhanaraj and Sivasankaran Nair, 2009). At a first sight, an ancillary ligand exhibiting cytotoxic activity is not desirable. Nevertheless, it has been established that pyridine Schiff bases harboring an intramolecular hydrogen bond depend on the non-coordinated nitrogen found in the pyridine ring to exert their antimicrobial activity (Carreño et al., 2015a,b, 2018a,b). Considering that coordination of Re(I) core occurs through the pyridine nitrogen in this kind of Schiff bases, the resulting fac-Re(I)(CO)3(N,N)(pyridine Schiff Base)+ complexes exhibit lower cytotoxicity for walled cells, when compared with the respective free ancillary ligand (Carreño et al., 2015a,b, 2016, 2017a,b, 2018a,b). More importantly, fac-Re(I)(CO)3(N,N)(pyridine Schiff Base)+ complexes are useful to observe walled cells, including bacteria and fungi, through fluorescence microscopy. Thus, an efficient staining can be achieved with a simple protocol, with short incubation times (15–30 min), at 37°C, and in absence of an additional permeabilizer agent (Carreño et al., 2016, 2017a). Interestingly, these same complexes were also useful to stain non-walled cells (i.e., epithelial cell line), but only after long incubations periods (48–72 h) (Carreño et al., 2016), suggesting that these Re(I) complexes could be considered as being especially designed for walled cells.
A combination of different features in the Re(I)-based fluorophores, such as a cationic nature, a dinitrogenated ligand and a suitable ancillary ligand (e.g., as a pyridine Schiff base such as (E)-2-((3-amino-pyridin-4-ylimino)-methyl)-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol)) (Carreño et al., 2016, 2017a) are useful to develop new fluorophores for walled cells. Remarkably, small modifications in the nature of these components, such as the substituent groups in the dinitrogenated ligand, can even allow for obtaining differential fluorophores. For instance, fac-Re(I)(CO)3(2,2′-bpy)((E)-2-((3-amino-pyridin-4-ylimino)-methyl)-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol))+ can differentially stain bud-like structures when used to stain Candida albicans or Cryptococcus spp. (yeasts). By contrast, a small change in the dinitrogenated ligand, with the addition of a polar group (fac-Re(I)(CO)3(4,4′-diethanoate-2,2′-bpy)((E)-2-((3-amino-pyridin-4-ylimino)-methyl)-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol)+) produces a fluorophore that specifically stains the cell nucleus in these same fungi (Carreño et al., 2016, 2017a). This phenomenon was also observed with other d6-based fluorophores, where cis-Ru(II)(4,4′-diethanoate-2,2′-bipyridine) was useful to stain yeasts, remaining retained in a structure consistent with the nucleus, whereas cis-Ru(II)(1,10-phenanthroline) was retained in a peripheric structure of the yeast, probably cell membrane or cell wall (Carreño et al., 2019b). This evidence supports that relatively small substitutions, not necessarily involving long aliphatic chains, are enough to change the properties of other d6-based fluorophores, including Re(I) and Ru(II) complexes. In this regard, potential intermolecular interactions that these substituents could form with biological systems, is a fundamental property to be considered in the development of d6-based differential luminescent dyes (Carreño et al., 2017a). Some examples of how ligands affect staining properties of Re(I) complexes in walled cells are shown in Figure 2. High versatility of the d6-based fluorophores will plausibly allow the generation of diverse biological probes, even in the absence of other moieties aimed to provide specificity, such as antibodies.
Figure 2. Effect of ligands in the use of fac-Re(I)(CO)3(N,N)L(0, +) complexes in walled cells (yeasts). Fluorescence confocal microscopy images of Candida albicans (yeasts) stained with fac-Re(I)(CO)3(4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bpy)Br (A), fac-Re(I)(CO)3(4,4′-diethanoate-2,2′-bpy)Br (B), or fac-Re(I)(CO)3 (4,4′-diethanoate-2,2′-bpy) [(E)-2-((3-amino-pyridin-4-ylimino)-methyl)-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol]+ (C) were compared. “Red channel” corresponds to excitation of 405 nm and emission collected in a range of 555 to 625 nm. In all cases, microorganisms were observed fresh, immobilized with 1% agarose, using a 100× objective. DMSO alone was used to set the detection threshold (not shown). White bars represent 5 μm. The complete protocol for staining and other examples of how ligand choice impacts on staining properties of d6 complexes were previously reported (Carreño et al., 2016, 2017a, 2019b).
Regarding filamentous fungi (mold, walled cells), Re(I) complexes harboring a pyridine Schiff base have been shown to be useful to stain both spores and hyphae of Botrytis cinerea, a ubiquitous necrotrophic filamentous fungal pathogen causing the “gray mold” disease in a wide range of plants. Since hyphae and conidia from Botrytis cinerea present a dynamic multilayer cell wall that varies the composition during normal growth (Cantu et al., 2009), it is difficult to develop suitable fluorophores to stain these structures. Recently, it has been reported that cationic Re(I) complexes with a dinitrogenated ligand and a pyridine Schiff base as ancillary ligand (e.g., fac-Re(I)(CO)3(2,2′-bpy)((E)-2-((3-amino-pyridin-4-ylimino)-methyl)-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol)+) were useful to stain Botrytis cinerea structures, including conidia and juvenile hyphae. In that work, a new protocol was proposed as incubation at higher temperatures (65°C) can be useful to stain this kind of fungal structures. Furthermore, evidence of selective staining of living conidia was provided, opening a new focus for the generation of Re(I)-based fluorophores with potential use for vital staining (Carreño et al., 2019a).
Conclusion
Use of Re(I)-based complexes as fluorophores is increasingly gaining attention. Development of new applications in walled cells, such as bacteria and fungi, has underlined that systematic research of the best molecular features is fundamental to engineer new, improved fluorophores. Accordingly, fac-Re(I)(CO)3(N,N)L+ complexes should fulfill some desirable structural features:
1) Charge: Monocationic nature.
2) N,N: the presence of a bpy or phen with relatively small substituents (e.g., methyl, ethyl ester). Changes in these substituents can produce complexes for differential staining.
3) Ancillary ligand: An ancillary ligand lacking long aliphatic chains but preferentially presenting groups favoring the formation of hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonds potentially could improve interactions with biomolecules found in biological systems, improving retention.
A combination of these three features provides high plasticity to develop new Re(I) complexes with specific properties, adapted for a particular purpose regarding the generation of fluorophores for walled cells. It also important to remark that it is necessary to establish a suitable staining protocol since, depending on the organisms, increasing temperature or incubation time could greatly improve results.
Finally, it is possible to conclude that d6-based complexes exhibit a high versatility, allowing the development of new molecules for diverse applications, including fluorophores especially designed for walled cells, showing low cytotoxicity, cellular uptake and differential staining properties.
Author Contributions
CO contributed with bibliographic research of eukaryotic, non-walled cells, and critical reading. AC contributed with the whole chemical section (Table 1), general discussion, review organization, and paper writing. RP contributed with bibliographic research of molds and critical reading. FL contributed with critical reading and Figure 1. RA-P contributed with critical reading, with emphasis on rhenium chemistry. MG contributed with critical reading, with emphasis on chemical properties. JF contributed with the whole biological section (Table 1; Figure 2), general discussion, review organization, and paper writing.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Funded by FONDECYT 11170637 (AC), 1181638 (JF), Project RC120001 of the Iniciativa Científica Milenio (ICM), and Proyecto Núcleo UNAB DI-1419-16/N and DI-02-19/N.
References
Agrawal, U., Reilly, D. T., and Schroeder, C. M. (2013). Zooming in on biological processes with fluorescence nanoscopy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24, 646–653. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.016
Amoroso, A. J., Arthur, R. J., Coogan, M. P., Court, J. B., Fernandez-Moreira, V., Hayes, A. J., et al. (2008). 3-Chloromethylpyridyl bipyridine fac-tricarbonyl rhenium: a thiol-reactive luminophore for fluorescence microscopy accumulates in mitochondria. N. J. Chem. 32, 1097–1102. doi: 10.1039/b802215a
Amoroso, A. J., Coogan, M. P., Dunne, J. E., Fernández-Moreira, V., Hess, J. B., Hayes, A. J., et al. (2007). Rhenium fac tricarbonyl bisimine complexes: biologically useful fluorochromes for cell imaging applications. Chem. Commun. 2007, 3066–3068. doi: 10.1039/B706657K
Amoroso, A. J., and Pope, S. J. (2015). Using lanthanide ions in molecular bioimaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 4723–4742. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00293H
Antelman, J., Wilking-Chang, C., Weiss, S., and Michalet, X. (2009). Nanometer distance measurements between multicolor quantum dots. Nano Lett. 9, 2199–2205. doi: 10.1021/nl901163k
Atoini, Y., Prasetyanto, E. A., Chen, P. K., Jonckheere, D., De Vos, D., and De Cola, L. (2017). Tuning luminescent properties of a metal organic framework by insertion of metal complexes. Supramol. Chem. 29, 758–767. doi: 10.1080/10610278.2017.1290249
Baird, G. S., Zacharias, D. A., and Tsien, R. Y. (2000). Biochemistry, mutagenesis, and oligomerization of DsRed, a red fluorescent protein from coral. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 11984–11989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.11984
Baker, M. (2010). Nanotechnology imaging probes: smaller and more stable. Nat. Methods 7, 957–962. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1210-957
Balasubramaniam, A. M., Sriraman, R., Sindhuja, P., Mohideen, K., Parameswar, R. A., and Muhamed Haris, K. T. (2015). Autofluorescence based diagnostic techniques for oral cancer. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 7, S374–377. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163456
Bonello, R. O., Morgan, I. R., Yeo, B. R., Jones, L. E. J., Kariuki, B. M., Fallis, I. A., et al. (2014). Luminescent rhenium(I) complexes of substituted imidazole [4,5-f]-1,10-phenanthroline derivatives. J. Organomet. Chem. 749, 150–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2013.08.031
Borman, S. T. U. (2010). Illuminating tumor cells. Chem. Eng. News 88:12. doi: 10.1021/cen-v088n019.p012
Botchway, S. W., Charnley, M., Haycock, J. W., Parker, A. W., Rochester, D. L., Weinstein, J. A., et al. (2008). Time-resolved and two-photon emission imaging microscopy of live cells with inert platinum complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105, 16071–16076. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804071105
Bourassa, D., Elitt, C. M., Mccallum, A. M., Sumalekshmy, S., Mcrae, R. L., Morgan, M. T., et al. (2018). Chromis-1, a ratiometric fluorescent probe optimized for two-photon microscopy reveals dynamic changes in labile Zn(II) in differentiating oligodendrocytes. ACS Sens. 3, 458–467. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00887
Bullok, K. E., Dyszlewski, M., Prior, J. L., Pica, C. M., Sharma, V., and Piwnica-Worms, D. (2002). Characterization of novel histidine-tagged tat-peptide complexes dual-labeled with99mtc-tricarbonyl and fluorescein for scintigraphy and fluorescence microscopy. Bioconjug. Chem. 13, 1226–1237. doi: 10.1021/bc025573a
Cameron, J. M., Wales, D. J., and Newton, G. N. (2018). Shining a light on the photo-sensitisation of organic-inorganic hybrid polyoxometalates. Dalton Trans. 47, 5120–5136. doi: 10.1039/C8DT00400E
Cantu, D., Greve, L. C., Labavitch, J. M., and Powell, A. L. (2009). Characterization of the cell wall of the ubiquitous plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Mycol. Res. 113, 1396–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.09.006
Carreño, A., Aros, A. E., Otero, C., Polanco, R., Gacitúa, M., Arratia-Pérez, R., et al. (2017a). Substituted bidentate and ancillary ligands modulate the bioimaging properties of the classical Re(i) tricarbonyl core with yeasts and bacteria. N. J. Chem. 41, 2140–2147. doi: 10.1039/C6NJ03792E
Carreño, A., Fernández, K., Sáez-Cortez, F., Otero, C., Arratia-Pérez, R., Fuentes, J. A., et al. (2019a). Confocal microscopy studies of living fungal hyphae and conidia using rhenium (I) tricarbonyl complexes as fluorescent dyes. J. Chilean Chem. Soc. 92, 216–221. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2000.12061147
Carreño, A., Gacitúa, M., Fuentes, J. A., Páez-Hernández, D., Peñaloza, J. P., Otero, C., et al. (2016). Fluorescence probes for prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells using Re(CO)3+ complexes with an electron withdrawing ancillary ligand. N. J. Chem. 40, 7687–7700. doi: 10.1039/C6NJ00905K
Carreño, A., Gacitúa, M., Molins, E., and Arratia-Pérez, R. (2017b). X-ray diffraction and relativistic DFT studies on the molecular biomarker fac-Re(CO)3(4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bpy)(E-2-((3-amino-pyridin-4-ylimino)-methyl)-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol)(PF6). Chem. Papers 71, 2011–2022. doi: 10.1007/s11696-017-0196-6
Carreño, A., Gacitua, M., Paez-Hernandez, D., Polanco, R., Preite, M., Fuentes, J. A., et al. (2015a). Spectral, theoretical characterization and antifungal properties of two phenol derivative Schiff bases with an intramolecular hydrogen bond. N. J. Chem. 39, 7822–7831. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ01469G
Carreño, A., Gacitua, M., Schott, E., Zarate, X., Manriquez, J. M., Preite, M., et al. (2015b). Experimental and theoretical studies of the ancillary ligand (E)-2-((3-amino-pyridin-4-ylimino)-methyl)-4,6-di-tert-butylphenol in the rhenium(I) core. N. J. Chem. 39, 5725–5734. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ00772K
Carreño, A., Páez-Hernández, D., Zúñiga, C., Ramírez-Osorio, A., Nevermann, J., Rivera-Zaldívar, M. M., et al. (2019b). Prototypical cis-Ruthenium (II) complexes present differential fluorescent staining in walled-cell models (yeasts). Chemical Papers. 73, 1629–1637. doi: 10.1007/s11696-019-00714-z
Carreño, A., Rodriguez, L., Paez-Hernandez, D., Martin-Trasanco, R., Zuniga, C., Oyarzun, D. P., et al. (2018a). Two new fluorinated phenol derivatives pyridine schiff bases: synthesis, spectral, theoretical characterization, inclusion in epichlorohydrin-beta-cyclodextrin polymer, and antifungal effect. Front. Chem. 6:312. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00312
Carreño, A., Solis-Cespedes, E., Zuniga, C., Nevermann, J., Rivera-Zaldivar, M. M., Gacitua, M., et al. (2019). Cyclic voltammetry, relativistic DFT calculations and biological test of cytotoxicity in walled-cell models of two classical rhenium (I) tricarbonyl complexes with 5-amine-1,10-phenanthroline. Chem. Phys. Lett. 715, 231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2018.11.043
Carreño, A., Vega, A., Zarate, X., Schott, E., Gacitúa, M., Valenzuela, N., et al. (2014). Synthesis, characterization and computational studies of (E)-2-{[(2-Aminopyridin-3-Yl) Imino]-Methyl}-4,6-Di-tert-butylphenol. Quím. Nova 37, 584–588. doi: 10.5935/0100-4042.20140098
Carreño, A., Zúñiga, C., Páez-Hernández, D., Gacitúa, M., Polanco, R., Otero, C., et al. (2018b). Study of the structure–bioactivity relationship of three new pyridine Schiff bases: synthesis, spectral characterization, DFT calculations and biological assays. N. J. Chem. 42, 8851–8863. doi: 10.1039/C8NJ00390D
Caveney, N. A., Li, F. K., and Strynadka, N. C. (2018). Enzyme structures of the bacterial peptidoglycan and wall teichoic acid biogenesis pathways. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 53, 45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2018.05.002
Chalmers, N. I., Palmer, R. J. Jr., Du-Thumm, L., Sullivan, R., Shi, W., and Kolenbrander, P. E. (2007). Use of quantum dot luminescent probes to achieve single-cell resolution of human oral bacteria in biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 630–636. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02164-06
Cheng, M. H. Y., Savoie, H., Bryden, F., and Boyle, R. W. (2017). A convenient method for multicolour labelling of proteins with BODIPY fluorophores via tyrosine residues. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 16, 1260–1267. doi: 10.1039/C7PP00091J
Chudakov, D. M., Matz, M. V., Lukyanov, S., and Lukyanov, K. A. (2010). Fluorescent proteins and their applications in imaging living cells and tissues. Physiol. Rev. 90, 1103–1163. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00038.2009
Coda, S., Siersema, P. D., Stamp, G. W., and Thillainayagam, A. V. (2015). Biophotonic endoscopy: a review of clinical research techniques for optical imaging and sensing of early gastrointestinal cancer. Endosc. Int. Open 3, E380–392. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392513
Coogan, M. P., and Fernandez-Moreira, V. (2014). Progress with, and prospects for, metal complexes in cell imaging. Chem. Commun. 50, 384–399. doi: 10.1039/C3CC45229H
Coyle, B., Kavanagh, K., Mccann, M., Devereux, M., and Geraghty, M. (2003). Biometals 16, 321–329. doi: 10.1023/A:1020695923788
Cui, Q., Xu, J., Shen, G., Zhang, C., Li, L., and Antonietti, M. (2017). Hybridizing carbon nitride colloids with a shell of water-soluble conjugated polymers for tunable full-color emission and synergistic cell imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 43966–43974. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b13212
Da Silva, C. M., Da Silva, D. L., Modolo, L. V., Alves, R. B., De Resende, M. A., Martins, C. V. B., et al. (2011). Schiff bases: a short review of their antimicrobial activities. J. Adv. Res. 2, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2010.05.004
Das, A., and Snee, P. T. (2016). Synthetic developments of nontoxic quantum dots. Chemphyschem. 17, 598–617. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201500837
Doane, T. L., and Burda, C. (2012). The unique role of nanoparticles in nanomedicine: imaging, drug delivery and therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2885–2911. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15260f
Echeverría, C., Becerra, Á., Nuñez-Villena, F., Muñoz-Castro, A., Stehberg, J., Zheng, Z., et al. (2012). The paramagnetic and luminescent [Re6Se8I6]3− cluster. Its potential use as an antitumoral and biomarker agent. N. J. Chem. 36, 927–932. doi: 10.1039/c2nj21016a
Enterina, J. R., Wu, L., and Campbell, R. E. (2015). Emerging fluorescent protein technologies. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 27, 10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.05.001
Farrington, J. E., and Sannes, P. L. (2015). “Basement membranes and the extracellular matrix,” in Comparative Biology of the Normal Lung, 2nd edn., ed R. A. Parent (London, UK: Academic Press), 119–128. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-404577-4.00010-2
Fernandez-Moreira, V., Thorp-Greenwood, F. L., and Coogan, M. P. (2010). Application of d6 transition metal complexes in fluorescence cell imaging. Chem. Commun. 46, 186–202. doi: 10.1039/B917757D
Fernandez-Suarez, M., and Ting, A. Y. (2008). Fluorescent probes for super-resolution imaging in living cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 929–943. doi: 10.1038/nrm2531
Frederiksen, R. S., Alarcon-Llado, E., Krogstrup, P., Bojarskaite, L., Buch-Månson, N., Bolinsson, J., et al. (2016). Nanowire-aperture probe: local enhanced fluorescence detection for the investigation of live cells at the nanoscale. ACS Photonics 3, 1208–1216. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00126
Gao, T., He, H., Huang, R., Zheng, M., Wang, F.-F., Hu, Y.-J., et al. (2017). BODIPY-based fluorescent probes for mitochondria-targeted cell imaging with superior brightness, low cytotoxicity and high photostability. Dyes Pigments 141, 530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.03.009
Gupta, G., Das, A., Ghate, N. B., Kim, T., Ryu, J. Y., Lee, J., et al. (2016). Novel BODIPY-based Ru(ii) and Ir(iii) metalla-rectangles: cellular localization of compounds and their antiproliferative activities. Chem. Commun. 52, 4274–4277. doi: 10.1039/C6CC00046K
Haas, B. L., Matson, J. S., Dirita, V. J., and Biteen, J. S. (2014). Imaging live cells at the nanometer-scale with single-molecule microscopy: obstacles and achievements in experiment optimization for microbiology. Molecules 19, 12116–12149. doi: 10.3390/molecules190812116
Haas, K. L., and Franz, K. J. (2009). Application of metal coordination chemistry to explore and manipulate cell biology. Chem. Rev. 109, 4921–4960. doi: 10.1021/cr900134a
Hallett, A. J., Placet, E., Prieux, R., Mccafferty, D., Platts, J. A., Lloyd, D., et al. (2018). Exploring the cellular uptake and localisation of phosphorescent rhenium fac-tricarbonyl metallosurfactants as a function of lipophilicity. Dalton Trans. 47, 14241–14253. doi: 10.1039/C8DT00669E
Hananya, N., Eldar Boock, A., Bauer, C. R., Satchi-Fainaro, R., and Shabat, D. (2016). Remarkable enhancement of chemiluminescent signal by dioxetane-fluorophore conjugates: turn-ON chemiluminescence probes with color modulation for sensing and imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 13438–13446. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09173
Hauser, M., Wojcik, M., Kim, D., Mahmoudi, M., Li, W., and Xu, K. (2017). Correlative super-resolution microscopy: new dimensions and new opportunities. Chem. Rev. 117, 7428–7456. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00604
Heintzmann, R., and Huser, T. (2017). Super-resolution structured illumination microscopy. Chem. Rev. 117, 13890–13908. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00218
Hensle, E. M., and Blum, S. A. (2013). Phase separation polymerization of dicyclopentadiene characterized by in operando fluorescence microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12324–12328. doi: 10.1021/ja405283k
Isik Buyukeksi, S., Sengul, A., Erdonmez, S., Altindal, A., Orman, E. B., and Ozkaya, A. R. (2018). Spectroscopic, electrochemical and photovoltaic properties of Pt(ii) and Pd(ii) complexes of a chelating 1,10-phenanthroline appended perylene diimide. Dalton Trans. 47, 2549–2560. doi: 10.1039/C7DT04713D
Jarrahpour, A., Khalili, D., De Clercq, E., Salmi, C., and Brunel, J. M. (2007). Synthesis, antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity evaluation of some new bis-Schiff bases of isatin and their derivatives. Molecules 12, 1720–1730. doi: 10.3390/12081720
Justin Dhanaraj, C., and Sivasankaran Nair, M. (2009). Synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial studies of some Schiff-base metal(II) complexes. J. Coord. Chem. 62, 4018–4028. doi: 10.1080/00958970903191142
Kaplanis, M., Stamatakis, G., Papakonstantinou, V. D., Paravatou-Petsotas, M., Demopoulos, C. A., and Mitsopoulou, C. A. (2014). Re(I) tricarbonyl complex of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione: DNA binding, cytotoxicity, anti-inflammatory and anti-coagulant effects towards platelet activating factor. J. Inorg. Biochem. 135, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.02.003
Khalili Fard, J., Jafari, S., and Eghbal, M. A. (2015). A review of molecular mechanisms involved in toxicity of nanoparticles. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 5, 447–454. doi: 10.15171/apb.2015.061
Kim, E., Yang, K. S., Kohler, R. H., Dubach, J. M., Mikula, H., and Weissleder, R. (2015). Optimized near-IR fluorescent agents for in vivo imaging of Btk expression. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 1513–1518. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00152
Kubitscheck, U., Kuckmann, O., Kues, T., and Peters, R. (2000). Imaging and tracking of single GFP molecules in solution. Biophys. J. 78, 2170–2179. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76764-6
Kurz, P., Probst, B., Spingler, B., and Alberto, R. (2006). Ligand variations in [ReX(diimine)(CO)(3)] complexes: effects on photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 2966–2974. doi: 10.1002/ejic.200600166
Lambic, N. S., Sommer, R. D., and Ison, E. A. (2018). High-valent nitridorhenium(v) complexes containing PNP ligands: implications of ligand flexibility. Dalton Trans. 47, 758–768. doi: 10.1039/C7DT03615A
Langdon-Jones, E. E., Symonds, N. O., Yates, S. E., Hayes, A. J., Lloyd, D., Williams, R., et al. (2014). Fluorescent rhenium-naphthalimide conjugates as cellular imaging agents. Inorg. Chem. 53, 3788–3797. doi: 10.1021/ic500142z
Lee, L. C., Leung, K. K., and Lo, K. K. (2017). Recent development of luminescent rhenium(i) tricarbonyl polypyridine complexes as cellular imaging reagents, anticancer drugs, and antibacterial agents. Dalton Trans. 46, 16357–16380. doi: 10.1039/C7DT03465B
Li, C., Yu, M., Sun, Y., Wu, Y., Huang, C., and Li, F. (2011). A nonemissive iridium(III) complex that specifically lights-up the nuclei of living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11231–11239. doi: 10.1021/ja202344c
Li, K.-B., Chen, F.-Z., Zhang, S., Shi, W., Han, D.-M., Cai, C., et al. (2017). A nile red-based near-infrared fluorescent probe for endogenous hydrogen polysulfides in living cells. Anal. Methods 9, 6443–6447. doi: 10.1039/C7AY02376F
Li, X., Yang, X., Yuwen, L., Yang, W., Weng, L., Teng, Z., et al. (2016). Evaluation of toxic effects of CdTe quantum dots on the reproductive system in adult male mice. Biomaterials 96, 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.014
Liu, Y., Tu, D., Zhu, H., and Chen, X. (2013). Lanthanide-doped luminescent nanoprobes: controlled synthesis, optical spectroscopy, and bioapplications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 6924–6958. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60060b
Long, N., and Wong, W. (2015). The Chemistry of Molecular Imaging. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118854754
Lowry, M. S., Hudson, W. R., Pascal, R. A. Jr., and Bernhard, S. (2004). Accelerated luminophore discovery through combinatorial synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 14129–14135. doi: 10.1021/ja047156+
Maggioni, D., Fenili, F., D'alfonso, L., Donghi, D., Panigati, M., Zanoni, I., et al. (2012). Luminescent rhenium and ruthenium complexes of an amphoteric poly(amidoamine) functionalized with 1,10-phenanthroline. Inorg. Chem. 51, 12776–12788. doi: 10.1021/ic301616b
Mahler, B., Spinicelli, P., Buil, S., Quelin, X., Hermier, J. P., and Dubertret, B. (2008). Towards non-blinking colloidal quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 7, 659–664. doi: 10.1038/nmat2222
Majumder, S., Demott, C. M., Reverdatto, S., Burz, D. S., and Shekhtman, A. (2016). Total cellular RNA modulates protein activity. Biochemistry 55, 4568–4573. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00330
Michalet, X., Pinaud, F. F., Bentolila, L. A., Tsay, J. M., Doose, S., Li, J. J., et al. (2005). Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 307, 538–544. doi: 10.1126/science.1104274
Mitoraj, M. P., and Michalak, A. (2010). Sigma-donor and pi-acceptor properties of phosphorus ligands: an insight from the natural orbitals for chemical valence. Inorg. Chem. 49, 578–582. doi: 10.1021/ic901736n
Montgomery, C. P., Murray, B. S., New, E. J., Pal, R., and Parker, D. (2009). Cell-penetrating metal complex optical probes: targeted and responsive systems based on lanthanide luminescence. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 925–937. doi: 10.1021/ar800174z
Morais, G. R., Paulo, A., and Santos, I. (2012). Organometallic complexes for SPECT imaging and/or radionuclide therapy. Organometallics 31, 5693–5714. doi: 10.1021/om300501d
More, K. N., Lim, T.-H., Kim, S.-Y., Kang, J., Inn, K.-S., and Chang, D.-J. (2018). Characteristics of new bioreductive fluorescent probes based on the xanthene fluorophore: detection of nitroreductase and imaging of hypoxic cells. Dyes Pigments 151, 245–253. doi: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.01.008
Moriarty, R. D., Martin, A., Adamson, K., O'reilly, E., Mollard, P., Forster, R. J., et al. (2014). The application of water soluble, mega-Stokes-shifted BODIPY fluorophores to cell and tissue imaging. J. Microsc. 253, 204–218. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12111
Munoz-Osses, M., Godoy, F., Fierro, A., Gomez, A., and Metzler-Nolte, N. (2018). New organometallic imines of rhenium(i) as potential ligands of GSK-3beta: synthesis, characterization and biological studies. Dalton Trans 47, 1233–1242. doi: 10.1039/C7DT04344A
Mutavdzic, D., Xu, J., Thakur, G., Triulzi, R., Kasas, S., Jeremic, M., et al. (2011). Determination of the size of quantum dots by fluorescence spectroscopy. Analyst 136, 2391–2396. doi: 10.1039/c0an00802h
North, A. J., Hayne, D. J., Schieber, C., Price, K., White, A. R., Crouch, P. J., et al. (2015). Toward hypoxia-selective rhenium and technetium tricarbonyl complexes. Inorg. Chem. 54, 9594–9610. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01691
Omogo, B., Gao, F., Bajwa, P., Kaneko, M., and Heyes, C. D. (2016). Reducing blinking in small core-multishell quantum dots by carefully balancing confinement potential and induced lattice strain: the “Goldilocks” effect. ACS Nano 10, 4072–4082. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b06994
Osborne, M. A., and Fisher, A. A. (2016). Charge-tunnelling and self-trapping: common origins for blinking, grey-state emission and photoluminescence enhancement in semiconductor quantum dots. Nanoscale 8, 9272–9283. doi: 10.1039/C6NR00529B
Patra, M., and Gasser, G. (2012). Organometallic compounds: an opportunity for chemical biology? Chembiochem 13, 1232–1252. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201200159
Phimphivong, S., and Saavedra, S. S. (1998). Terbium chelate membrane label for time-resolved, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy of substrate-adherent cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 9, 350–357. doi: 10.1021/bc9701609
Rabuka, D., Forstner, M. B., Groves, J. T., and Bertozzi, C. R. (2008). Noncovalent cell surface engineering: incorporation of bioactive synthetic glycopolymers into cellular membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5947–5953. doi: 10.1021/ja710644g
Ranasinghe, K., Handunnetti, S., Perera, I. C., and Perera, T. (2016). Synthesis and characterization of novel rhenium(I) complexes towards potential biological imaging applications. Chem. Cent. J. 10:71. doi: 10.1186/s13065-016-0218-4
Ranjan, S., Jayakumar, M. K., and Zhang, Y. (2015). Luminescent lanthanide nanomaterials: an emerging tool for theranostic applications. Nanomedicine. 10, 1477–1491. doi: 10.2217/nnm.14.229
Ritchie, K., Lill, Y., Sood, C., Lee, H., and Zhang, S. (2013). Single-molecule imaging in live bacteria cells. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 368:20120355. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0355
Roeffaers, M. B., Ameloot, R., Baruah, M., Uji, I. H., Bulut, M., De Cremer, G., et al. (2008). Morphology of large ZSM-5 crystals unraveled by fluorescence microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5763–5772. doi: 10.1021/ja7113147
Roy, S., Hagen, K. D., Maheswari, P. U., Lutz, M., Spek, A. L., Reedijk, J., et al. (2008). Phenanthroline derivatives with improved selectivity as DNA-targeting anticancer or antimicrobial drugs. ChemMedChem 3, 1427–1434. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.200800097
Sacksteder, L., Zipp, A. P., Brown, E. A., Streich, J., Demas, J. N., and Degraff, B. A. (1990). Luminescence studies of pyridine alpha-diimine rhenium(I) tricarbonyl complexes. Inorg. Chem. 29, 4335–4340. doi: 10.1021/ic00346a033
Santoro, G., Blacque, O., and Zobi, F. (2012). Post-protein binding metal-mediated coupling of an acridine orange-based fluorophore. Metallomics 4, 253–259. doi: 10.1039/c2mt00175f
Sanz, A. B., Garcia, R., Rodriguez-Pena, J. M., and Arroyo, J. (2017). The CWI pathway: regulation of the transcriptional adaptive response to cell wall stress in yeast. J. Fungi 4:E1. doi: 10.3390/jof4010001
Sathish, V., Babu, E., Ramdass, A., Lu, Z. Z., Velayudham, M., Thanasekaran, P., et al. (2014). Alkoxy bridged binuclear rhenium (I) complexes as a potential sensor for beta-amyloid aggregation. Talanta 130, 274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.06.070
Shaner, N. C. (2014). Fluorescent proteins for quantitative microscopy: important properties and practical evaluation. Methods Cell Biol. 123, 95–111. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420138-5.00006-9
Shaner, N. C., Campbell, R. E., Steinbach, P. A., Giepmans, B. N., Palmer, A. E., and Tsien, R. Y. (2004). Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1567–1572. doi: 10.1038/nbt1037
Shang, L., Dong, S. J., and Nienhaus, G. U. (2011). Ultra-small fluorescent metal nanoclusters: synthesis and biological applications. Nano Today 6, 401–418. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2011.06.004
Silva, B. F., Andreani, T., Gavina, A., Vieira, M. N., Pereira, C. M., Rocha-Santos, T., et al. (2016). Toxicological impact of cadmium-based quantum dots towards aquatic biota: effect of natural sunlight exposure. Aquat. Toxicol. 176, 197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.05.001
Sochacki, K. A., Shkel, I. A., Record, M. T., and Weisshaar, J. C. (2011). Protein diffusion in the periplasm of E. coli under osmotic stress. Biophys. J. 100, 22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.044
Song, B., Vandevyver, C. D., Chauvin, A. S., and Bunzli, J. C. (2008). Time-resolved luminescence microscopy of bimetallic lanthanide helicates in living cells. Org. Biomol. Chem. 6, 4125–4133. doi: 10.1039/b811427g
Stepanenko, O. V., Kuznetsova, I. M., Verkhusha, V. V., and Turoverov, K. K. (2013). Beta-barrel scaffold of fluorescent proteins: folding, stability and role in chromophore formation. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 302, 221–278. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407699-0.00004-2
Stephenson, K. A., Banerjee, S. R., Besanger, T., Sogbein, O. O., Levadala, M. K., Mcfarlane, N., et al. (2004). Bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo imaging: isostructural Re and 99mTc complexes for correlating fluorescence and radioimaging studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 8598–8599. doi: 10.1021/ja047751b
Stufkens, D. J., and Vlcek, A. (1998). Ligand-dependent excited state behaviour of Re(I) and Ru(II) carbonyl-diimine complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 177, 127–179. doi: 10.1016/S0010-8545(98)00132-5
Taylor, A., Barlow, N., Day, M. P., Hill, S., Martin, N., and Patriarca, M. (2018). Atomic spectrometry update: review of advances in the analysis of clinical and biological materials, foods and beverages. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 33, 338–382. doi: 10.1039/C8JA90005A
Thompson, R. E., Larson, D. R., and Webb, W. W. (2002). Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. Biophys. J. 82, 2775–2783. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75618-X
Thorp-Greenwood, F. L. (2012). An introduction to organometallic complexes in fluorescence cell imaging: current applications and future prospects. Organometallics 31, 5686–5692. doi: 10.1021/om3004477
Thorp-Greenwood, F. L., Balasingham, R. G., and Coogan, M. P. (2012). Organometallic complexes of transition metals in luminescent cell imaging applications. J. Organomet. Chem. 714, 12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2012.01.020
Thorp-Greenwood, F. L., and Coogan, M. P. (2011). Multimodal radio- (PET/SPECT) and fluorescence imaging agents based on metallo-radioisotopes: current applications and prospects for development of new agents. Dalton Trans. 40, 6129–6143. doi: 10.1039/c0dt01398f
Tian, H., Furstenberg, A., and Huber, T. (2017). Labeling and single-molecule methods to monitor G protein-coupled receptor dynamics. Chem. Rev. 117, 186–245. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00084
Vendrell, M., Zhai, D., Er, J. C., and Chang, Y. T. (2012). Combinatorial strategies in fluorescent probe development. Chem. Rev. 112, 4391–4420. doi: 10.1021/cr200355j
Virel, A., Sanchez-Lopez, J., Saa, L., Garcia, A. C., and Pavlov, V. (2009). Use of an osmium complex as a universal luminescent probe for enzymatic reactions. Chemistry 15, 6194–6198. doi: 10.1002/chem.200900498
Wang, X., Ren, X., Kahen, K., Hahn, M. A., Rajeswaran, M., Maccagnano-Zacher, S., et al. (2009). Non-blinking semiconductor nanocrystals. Nature 459, 686–689. doi: 10.1038/nature08072
Ward, C. L., Dimarco, B. N., O'donnell, R. M., and Meyer, G. J. (2018). Dye excited states oriented relative to TiO2 surface electric fields. J. Phys. Chem. C. 122, 13863–13871. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01010
Wood, E. J. (1994). Molecular probes: handbook of fluorescent probes and research chemicals. Biochem. Educ. 22:83. doi: 10.1016/0307-4412(94)90083-3
Xue, Z., Zhao, H., Liu, J., Han, J., and Han, S. (2017). Imaging Lysosomal pH alteration in stressed cells with a sensitive ratiometric fluorescence sensor. ACS Sens 2, 436–442. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00035
Yang, X., Zhanghao, K., Wang, H., Liu, Y., Wang, F., Zhang, X., et al. (2016). Versatile application of fluorescent quantum dot labels in super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. ACS Photonics 3, 1611–1618. doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b00178
Yoshimura, H. (2018). Live cell imaging of endogenous RNAs using pumilio homology domain mutants: principles and applications. Biochemistry 57, 200–208. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00983
You, Y., Cho, S., and Nam, W. (2014). Cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes for phosphorescence sensing of biological metal ions. Inorg. Chem. 53, 1804–1815. doi: 10.1021/ic4013872
Zanoni, K. P. S., Ito, A., Gruner, M., Murakami Iha, N. Y., and De Camargo, A. S. S. (2018). Photophysical dynamics of the efficient emission and photosensitization of [Ir(pqi)2(NN)](+) complexes. Dalton Trans. 47, 1179–1188. doi: 10.1039/C7DT03930A
Zhang, R., Rothenberg, E., Fruhwirth, G., Simonson, P. D., Ye, F., Golding, I., et al. (2011). Two-photon 3D FIONA of individual quantum dots in an aqueous environment. Nano Lett. 11, 4074–4078. doi: 10.1021/nl201225r
Keywords: rhenium (I) tricarbonyl complexes, Equatorial ligand, ancillary ligand, bacteria, fungi, yeasts, molds
Citation: Otero C, Carreño A, Polanco R, Llancalahuen FM, Arratia-Pérez R, Gacitúa M and Fuentes JA (2019) Rhenium (I) Complexes as Probes for Prokaryotic and Fungal Cells by Fluorescence Microscopy: Do Ligands Matter? Front. Chem. 7:454. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00454
Received: 22 March 2019; Accepted: 07 June 2019;
Published: 26 June 2019.
Edited by:
Sidney J. L. Ribeiro, São Paulo State University, BrazilReviewed by:
Julia Lorenzo, Autonomous University of Barcelona, SpainAnnaluisa Mariconda, University of Basilicata, Italy
Copyright © 2019 Otero, Carreño, Polanco, Llancalahuen, Arratia-Pérez, Gacitúa and Fuentes. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alexander Carreño, alexander.carreno@unab.cl; Juan A. Fuentes, jfuentes@unab.cl