Michael Goldflam
Christopher G. Ullman- 1Isogenica Ltd. Little Chesterford, UK
- 2Paratopix Ltd. Bishop's Stortford, UK
Peptides are important natural molecules that possess functions as diverse as antibiotics, toxins, venoms and hormones, for example. However, whilst these peptides have useful properties, there are many targets and pathways that are not addressed through the activities of natural peptidic compounds. In these circumstances, directed evolution techniques, such as phage display, have been developed to sample the diverse chemical and structural repertoire of small peptides for useful means. In this review, we consider recent concepts that relate peptide structure to drug-like attributes and how these are incorporated within display technologies to deliver peptides de novo with valuable pharmaceutical properties.
Peptides have traditionally been considered a poor choice for drug candidates owing to their low bioavailability, susceptibility to proteolysis, and rapid clearance (Craik et al., 2013; Otvos and Wade, 2014). Nevertheless, peptides are powerful natural mediators of biological processes (Kastin, 2006) and over 60 peptide products have been approved by the FDA with global sales estimated at US$14.7b in 2011 (seven of which have been generating sales in excess of US$0.5b) with a further 140 in clinical development (Reichart, 2010; Hamzeh-Mivehroud et al., 2013; Kaspar and Reichert, 2013). As a drug modality, peptides, and peptidomimetics occupy the interface between small molecule and larger biological drugs with the potential to have the specificity of antibodies and the bioavailability of small molecules. Yet, although this prospect has yet to be fully realized, there has been significant recent progress in this direction (Craik et al., 2013; Otvos and Wade, 2014). Peptides provide the researcher with interesting options for discovery, optimization, and manufacture as they can be synthesized chemically or expressed by recombinant systems. For example, recombinant methods of discovery, such as directed evolution display systems, have isolated novel sequences in addition to those found in nature. Additionally, chemical methods of improvement can be employed to optimize stability, affinity, or bioavailability. In this short review, we will briefly describe biological methods for discovering new peptide entities and the chemical methods that are implemented to improve pharmacological properties.
Early combinatorial peptide synthesis methods described synthesis of hexamer peptide libraries on pins or beads, but chemical synthesis methods have since improved significantly in scale and coupling efficiencies (Geysen and Mason, 1993; Lam et al., 1993; Breitling et al., 2009). However, recombinant display systems are capable of screening libraries that are orders of magnitude larger. These display methods are based upon the principle that each peptide maintains a link between itself and the nucleic acid code from which it was expressed so that it can be identified ultimately from a diverse population by nucleic acid sequencing, following cycles of binding, washing, and enrichment (Figure 1A). This genotype-phenotype link is exhibited by displaying the peptide with its genetic material encapsulated in a virus particle (e.g., phage display), or on the surface of a cell which contains the genetic information (e.g., yeast or bacterial display) or directly linked to the nucleic acid through non-covalent or covalent means (e.g., CIS display, mRNA display, and ribosome display) (Figure 1B; Ullman et al., 2011).
Figure 1. (A) Overview of the process of directed evolution. Combinatorial genetic libraries are created through mutagenesis, then transcribed and translated into peptides which retain a physical link with their encoding genetic information. Application of selection pressure, such as cycles of washing, amplification and further selection, enrich the binding clones within the population. Ultimately, binding peptides are identified through sequencing of the genetic material. (B) Diagram showing different formats of display where the peptide is expressed on the surface of a yeast or bacterium (i) (yeast/bacterial display); or a bacteriophage (ii) (phage display); or in complex with a ribosome (iii) (ribosome display); linked to RNA through puromycin (iv) (mRNA display); or bound to DNA through the cis activity of a DNA binding protein (v) (CIS display). In all these examples the peptide is associated with its coding sequence maintaining a genotype-phenotype link and is free to associate to its target (adapted from Ullman et al., 2011).
Cellular display approaches require cells to be transformed, a process that delivers the coding sequence of the peptide into a host cell for expression and display. In phage display, filamentous or T7 lytic bacteriophages are produced with the peptide expressed in fusion with a viral coat protein (usually pIII or pVIII in the case of M13). Within a diverse library, each phage particle carries a different peptide clone. This library is “panned” to select binding peptides amongst the population, panning conditions being balanced so that stringency is sufficient to isolate rare high affinity peptides from a background of poor or non-binding members (Smith and Petrenko, 1997; Sidhu et al., 2000; Hoogenboom, 2005; Levin and Weiss, 2006; Sergeeva et al., 2006; Krumpe and Mori, 2007; Hamzeh-Mivehroud et al., 2013). Molecules isolated by phage display are now just reaching the market, for example Peginesatide, a novel PEGylated peptide. Peginesatide acts as an agonist of the erythropoietin receptor and was approved by the FDA for the treatment of anemia due to chronic kidney disease in adult patients on dialysis (Wrighton et al., 1996; Macdougall et al., 2009; Reichart, 2010). Although effective, Peginesatide has now been withdrawn due to safety concerns. Phage display has been used successfully for in vivo panning (“biopanning”) in animal and human subjects to isolate tissue-specific peptides and those that can transgress biological barriers such as the skin, blood brain barrier, intestinal tract, and cell membrane (Arap et al., 2002; Frenkel and Solomon, 2002; Gao et al., 2002; Duerr et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2006; Sergeeva et al., 2006; Giordano et al., 2010). Yeast and bacterial display are technically related methods where peptides or proteins can be expressed on the surface of cells in fusion with Aga2p (yeast) or bacterial flagellin, outer membrane proteins, such as OmpA, or albumin binding protein and XM' sequence of staphylococcal protein A followed by affinity based cell-sorting methods (Daugherty, 2007; Gai and Wittrup, 2007; Rockberg et al., 2008).
Cell-free methods of peptide display avoid the need for transformation and therefore are not bound by the practical limitations of this procedure [typically up to 1010 clones for phage although 1012 has been reported (Sidhu et al., 2000)], but can reach a theoretical diversity of 1014 clones. Therefore, cell-free methods potentially allow greater coverage of the sequence space. These methods use the transcription and translation machinery extracted from prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell lysates. In ribosome display, ribosomes are stalled on the mRNA template through the absence of a stop codon and the nascent peptide remains in a complex with the ribosomes; a C-terminal peptide spacer facilitates correct folding of the displayed polypeptide free from steric hindrance by the ribosomal tunnel (Mattheakis et al., 1994; Hanes and Plückthun, 1997; Douthwaite and Jackson, 2012). A related technique, mRNA display, differentiates itself from ribosome display by the formation of a covalent link between the template and the expressed peptide via puromycin. Puromycin is carried on a DNA primer appended to the mRNA template and mimics amino-acyl tRNA, binding covalently to the nascent peptide as a result of the peptidyl transferase activity of the ribosome (Nemoto et al., 1997; Roberts and Szostak, 1997; Douthwaite and Jackson, 2012). The RNA based systems can be very sensitive to RNAse degradation and reconstituted transcription translation systems have been employed to reduce this effect, for example the PURE system (Shimizu et al., 2001, 2005). DNA based cell-free systems such as, CIS display, which harnesses the ability of a DNA-binding protein (RepA) that exclusively binds back to its encoding template, offer the advantage of speed, ease of use, and template stability over RNA (Odegrip et al., 2004; Eldridge et al., 2009; Patel et al., 2013).
These aforementioned display systems enable vast libraries to be screened based upon natural L-amino acids. However, in order to drive efficacy, non-natural additions may be required. In this respect we can gain insight from natural solutions. An exemplar of an effective natural peptide drug is the macrocycle cyclosporin A (CsA; Figure 2A). Originally isolated from the fungus Tolypocladium inflatum it has been intensively studied to understand the correlation between structural features and pharmaceutically relevant properties (Loosli et al., 1985; Kessler et al., 1990; Ko and Dalvit, 1992; Jin and Harrison, 2002). These studies have revealed four key features responsible for CsA's cell permeability, serum stability, and oral bioavailability: a cyclic backbone; incorporation of seven N-methyl groups; four intramolecular hydrogen bond donors; incorporation of three non-natural amino acid. Thus, CsA exhibits exquisite drug-like properties despite violating medicinal chemistry's traditional rule of 5: No more than 5 hydrogen bond donors and 10 acceptors, a molecular mass of less than 500 Da, and a logP coefficient no higher than 5 (Lipinski et al., 2001).
Figure 2. (A) Structure of CsA; (B–D) Incorporation of non-natural amino acids in peptide display systems: (B) Examples for the wide scope of non-natural amino acids that can be included in display systems e.g., from left to right, D-tyrosine, N-Methyl-L-alanine, (S)-2-amino-4-azidobutanoic acid, (S)-2-aminohex-5-ynoic acid, (S)-2-amino-3,3-dimethylbutanoic acid; (C) Incorporation of 4-selenalysine allows the formation of a lantipeptide with a cysteine residue; (D) Incorporation of amino acids with a chloroacetylated N terminus allows the formation of thioether bond with a downstream cysteine. (E–G): Posttranslational modifications in peptide display systems: (E) Formation of a cyclic peptide via a disulphide bond; (F) Formation of a cyclic peptide by cross linking two or three cysteine residues with activated aryls, e.g., tris-(bromomethyl)benzene; (G) Formation of a cyclic peptide by cross linking the N terminus with a downstream lysine via disuccinimidyl glutarate.
Investigations into other natural products and synthetic peptide libraries have further highlighted the importance of cyclisation and N-methylation for pharmacological properties to the extent that these attributes reduce flexibility and favor resistance to proteolysis, and provide a capacity to permeate biological membranes through a reduction of the number of amide hydrogen bond donors through N-methylation (Biron et al., 2008; White et al., 2011). In addition, both cyclisation and N-methylation support the formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds which further decreases flexibility and solvation (Biron et al., 2008; White et al., 2011). Interestingly, most studies of passive membrane perfusion by cyclic peptide libraries have demonstrated that the impact of N-methylation on membrane permeability was highly position dependent and not necessary correlated with increasing N-methyl content (Biron et al., 2008; White et al., 2011). Instead, optimal N-methylation patterns favored conformations with reduced hydrogen bonding potential for solvation by water, therefore reducing the desolvation of the peptide before entering the membrane while simultaneously concealing the hydrophilic backbone from the membrane environment. Furthermore, it was established for CsA that passive transcellular absorption might be a general characteristic of a macrocycle that can assume multiple interconverting conformations between the aqueous environment and the lipophilic environment of the membrane (Bockus et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015). Finally, it is generally accepted that flexible molecules face a higher entropic barrier upon binding to their target than restrained molecules and often have lower affinity than cyclic counterparts. The same effect might influence the translocation of molecules from the highly mobile aqueous phase to the reduced entropic environment of the membrane (Bockus et al., 2013). Indeed, Veber et al. have shown that the number of rotatable bonds is a better predictor of bioavailability than molecular weight. These findings have helped to drive new thinking and interest in designing novel molecules that occupy the chemical space beyond the borders dictated by the Lipinski rules of 5 (Veber et al., 2002). For macrocyles a recent study highlighted an increase of clinical candidates administered by oral routes (43%) compared to already registered drugs (28%). In the subgroup of cyclic peptides CsA is currently the only oral prescribed drug. However, 3 out of 11 cyclic peptides in trials have biophysical properties similar to CsA and are tested for oral applications (Giordanetto and Kihlberg, 2014).
Non-standard natural product peptides have provided excellent leads for drug discovery in the field of antibiotics. However, most of these peptides are synthesized by non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, as is CsA. Although these modifications can be synthesized chemically, the capacity of molecular evolution methods in biological systems to generate libraries of trillions of peptides is extremely attractive (Ullman et al., 2011). Approaches to reengineer the complex gene cluster involved in the synthesis of such peptides has proved to be very challenging, however, several modifications have been made to molecular display technologies to produce peptides incorporating such features. These technologies can be broadly classified into methodologies that are based on the incorporation of non-natural amino acids and those that are based on post-translational modification of encoded peptides.
Improving Pharmacological Properties of Peptides by Post-translational Modification
The first post-translational modification of a genetically encoded phage peptide library involved cyclisation through disulphide-bridge formation in which two invariant cysteine residues flanked a random amino acid sequence (Figure 2E). Such cyclic peptides had between 100 and 1000 fold higher affinities than linear peptides isolated for the same target (O'Neil et al., 1992; McLafferty et al., 1993), yet the sensitivity of the bond to reducing environments encouraged the development of chemistry-based cyclisation methods to obtain redox insensitive macrocyles. For example, a modification of mRNA display based on disuccinimidyl glutarate, which cross-linked the N-terminus and an internal lysine sidechain (Figure 2G) to identify a cyclic peptide from a trillion member library that bound to Gαi1 with high affinity (Ki = 2 nM; Millward et al., 2005). The cyclic peptide showed 15-fold improved affinity and 2.5-fold improved proteolytic stability compared to the linear motif (Millward et al., 2007).
The concept of using organic chemistry based cyclisation methods to improve the properties of DNA encoded peptides was further advanced by installing an activated aryl (tris-(bromomethyl)benzene) to crosslink phage-displayed peptide libraries containing three invariant cysteines into bi-cyclic peptides (termed “bicycle”; Figure 2F; Heinis et al., 2009). Selection with phage display against human plasma kallikrein yielded specific inhibitors in the mid nM range which could be further improved by affinity maturation to IC50 1.7 nM. The linear analogs did not show any inhibition at up to 10 μM, thereby underlining the importance of the cyclic structure of the peptide. The high specificity for human over mouse kallikrein and other proteases was reasoned to be a result of the large interaction interface between bicyclic peptide and target, a potential advantage over mono-cyclic peptides (Heinis et al., 2009). Activated aryls have been also used in the selection of monocyclic peptides expressed by mRNA display (Schlippe et al., 2012).
Post-translational modifications to improve pharmacological properties of displayed peptides can also be introduced enzymatically. Several approaches have been described in the literature, e.g., the introduction of azoline moieties in peptide backbones (Goto et al., 2014) or head-to-tail cyclisation via an split-intein approach within cells using phenotype-based selection rather than display. Kritzer et al. used this approach to select candidates from a cyclic octamer peptide library, which were able to rescue a yeast model of α-synuclein toxicity and able to prevent neuron loss in a C. elegans model. Although the use of a yeast platform limits the available library size, it allows selection based on phenotype which has the advantage that candidates are selected for efficacy rather than affinity and toxic sequences are avoided (Kritzer et al., 2009). Yeast have also been reprogrammed for the incorporation of non-natural amino acids through orthologous amino acyl tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs (Chin, 2011). Recently, sidechain-to-tail cyclization through ligation of 1,3- or 1,2-aminothiol functionalities within non-natural amino acids and the C-terminus has been reported enabling the isolation of improved streptavidin binding peptides from a 144-member library produced inside cells (Frost et al., 2015).
Improving Pharmacological Properties of Peptides by Incorporation of Non-natural Amino Acids
Two major routes have been explored to express peptides with non-natural amino acids: Firstly, exploiting the ability of native aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to mischarge tRNAs, and secondly performing genetic reprogramming via engineered aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Both serve the goal of enhancing pharmacokinetic parameters either by offering functionalized groups for cyclisation or incorporation of elements that favor cell permeability (e.g., N-methylation) or protease resistance.
Although, orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNAs and ribosomes have been engineered within cells (Rackham and Chin, 2005), a favored method of introducing non-natural amino acids is to use cell-free in vitro transcription translation systems which offer greater flexibility and library capacity. Szostak's group studied the ability of wildtype aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to mischarge tRNAs in situ with non-natural amino acids or the use of reconstituted cell-free transcription translation mixtures (Hartman et al., 2007; Schlippe et al., 2012). In total, over 50 substrates were found to be compatible with the in vitro expression system leading to ribosomal synthesis of a 15-mer peptide containing 13 non-natural amino acids. Although, most structures of these substrates were close analogs to their cognate amino acids, some included interesting functional groups as halo-aryl, alkene, azide and tert-butyl groups (Figure 2B). Although successful incorporation of N-methylated amino acids was possible, the yields obtained were low. This was attributed to the inefficiency of wildtype aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to mischarge tRNAs rather than the ribosomal incorporation of such mischarged tRNAs into the nascent peptide chain. It was feasible to overcome this limitation by supplementation of the in vitro expression system with purified pre-charged tRNAs that had previously been methylated by chemical means (Subtelny et al., 2008, 2011).
These advances were applied to mRNA display for the selection of cyclic peptides containing non-natural amino acids. In the following study, a RNA library encoded random 10-mer peptides where 12 of the 20 proteinogenic amino acids were replaced by non-natural amino acids. The random region was flanked by two constant cysteine residues which were used to cyclise the peptide via the activated aryl α,α′-Dibromo-m-xylene. Selection against thrombin yielded two peptides of low nanomolar affinity in which cyclisation and incorporation of non-natural amino acids was required for binding to thrombin. This work exemplified the combination of both incorporation of non-natural amino acids and postranslational modification, however yet doesn't address the advantages in respect of proteolytic stability or oral bioavailability by incorporation of the non-natural amino acids (Schlippe et al., 2012).
The added functionality which can be introduced by incorporation of non-natural amino acids can also be used to cyclise peptides directly. 4-selenalysine can be used as substrate for lysine in an in vitro expression system and treated with hydrogen peroxide for oxidative elimination of the seleno moiety. The resulting dehydroalanine can subsequently react with cysteine to form a lantipeptide via a stable thioether bond (Figure 2C; Seebeck et al., 2011). The approach was applied to select lantipeptides from an mRNA encoded peptide library against Sortase A. Several lantipeptides could be identified, albeit with low μM affinities and the stereochemistry of the thioether bond had to be confirmed by synthesizing potential isomers (Hofmann et al., 2012). Natural lantipeptides represent an interesting class of macrocyclic modulators produced by a range of Gram-positive bacteria and are often characterized by antibacterial activities (Knerr and van der Donk, 2012). In future, therapeutic peptides might also be cyclized by the incorporation of dithiol amino acids which reduce the complexity of synthesizing disulphide rich sequences and have been demonstrated to significantly improve the activity of parental peptides that possess –CC- motifs. However, this has yet to be translated to biological systems (Chen et al., 2014).
An alternative to mischarge tRNAs with native aminoacyl tRNA synthetases enzymes has been developed based on flexizymes, a group of ribozymes that were engineered to aminoacylate tRNAs. These flexizymes were developed to have a low specificity toward the discriminatory nucleotides of a particular tRNA and, therefore, accept a broad spectrum of tRNA's as substrates. Three main flexizymes have been produced to recognize different leaving groups on activated amino acids leading to improved charging of the tRNAs with the non-natural amino acids based on the properties of the side chain. Orthogonal tRNAs, not recognized by wild type amino acyl tRNA synthesases, are used in place of native tRNAs and are accepted by the ribosome as substrates. Therefore, the problematic incorporation of competing proteinogenic amino acids during translation can be avoided. The generated non-natural amino acid charged tRNAs can then be added to an optimized in vitro expression system to fill codons within the genetic code that have been left vacant by withdrawing specific amino acids and their cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, therefore “reprogramming” the codon to the new components (Figures 2B,D; Ohta et al., 2007; Ohuchi et al., 2007; Xiao et al., 2008; Goto et al., 2011; Reid et al., 2012). This has recently been reviewed elsewhere (Passioura et al., 2014).
Display Independent Approaches to Enhance Bioavailability
So far this report has focused on molecular display technologies which incorporate non-natural amino acids or post-translational modifications prior to selection so that compounds can be selected for affinity whilst incorporating elements to improve biophysical and biological properties. In theory, the bioavailability of a compound can be addressed following the isolation of a binder, however, in practice this has proven to be difficult. Conformational constrains or modifications that improve bioavailability often negatively affect the affinity with the exception of peptides in stable secondary structures. In particular the modification of α-helices with hydrocarbon staples has been shown to benefit both proteolytic stability and cell permeability. Although this approach is not always successful, attrition rates seem to be low if detailed structural data is available (Cromm et al., 2015). Similar methods have also been applied to β-turn structures (Obrecht et al., 2012).
A further variation presents the use of stable mini-scaffolds that are known to have good bioavailability but are still amendable to chemical synthesis. For example, cyclotides are small head-to-tail cyclised disulfide rich peptides, which have the potential to reach intracellular targets (Greenwood et al., 2007). These scaffolds can be used as hosts for grafted active sequences (Gould et al., 2011). Recently, recombinant expression of cyclotides in yeast by a split-intein approach coupled to a phenotypic screen has been developed thereby opening the doors to screen genetically encoded cyclotide-based libraries in eukaryotic cells (Jagadish et al., 2015).
Future Perspectives
Methods to modify natural peptides and those discovered de novo by man using directed evolution have generated peptidic ligands with improved properties, such as high affinity, excellent target specificity and good plasma stability; additional modifications can also provide pharmacological features to extend in vivo half-life, if necessary. Future developments may ultimately produce peptides that can be delivered orally, transverse the blood brain barrier or access intracellular targets. The selectivity of peptides, their rapid clearance by kidney filtration and capacity for chemical modification are particularly beneficial for molecular imaging applications and, potentially, for delivering toxic payloads as peptide drug conjugates. In terms of target interactions, peptides can occupy hydrophobic pockets favored by small molecules and therefore provide an attractive means for the discovery of druggable sites on proteins by acting as probes or templates for pharmaceutical drugs. These applications will see peptides becoming useful tools for target identification, validation in addition to their use as therapeutics.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors have worked for Isogenica Ltd., a company which owns patents for CIS display.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Marie Curie ITN WntsApp (Grant no. 608180).
References
Arap, W., Kolonin, M. G., Trepel, M., Lahdenranta, J., Cardó-Vila, M., Giordano, R. J., et al. (2002). Steps toward mapping the human vasculature by phage display. Nat. Med. 8, 121–127. doi: 10.1038/nm0202-121
Biron, E., Chatterjee, J., Ovadia, O., Langenegger, D., Brueggen, J., Hoyer, D., et al. (2008). Improving oral bioavailability of peptides by multiple N-methylation: somatostatin analogues. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 2595–2599. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705797
Bockus, A. T., McEwen, C. M., and Lokey, R. S. (2013). Form and function in cyclic peptide natural products: a pharmacokinetic perspective. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 13, 821–836. doi: 10.2174/1568026611313070005
Breitling, F., Nesterov, A., Stadler, V., Felgenhauer, T., and Bischoff, F. R. (2009). High-density peptide arrays. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 224–234. doi: 10.1039/b819850k
Chen, S., Gopalakrishnan, R., Schaer, T., Marger, F., Hovius, R., Bertrand, D., et al. (2014). Dithiol amino acids can structurally shape and enhance the ligand-binding properties of polypeptides. Nat. Chem. 6, 1009–1016. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2043
Chen, Y., Shen, Y., Guo, X., Zhang, C., Yang, W., Ma, M., et al. (2006). Transderml protein delivery by a coadministered peptide identified via phage display. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 455–460. doi: 10.1038/nbt1193
Chin, J. W. (2011). Reprogramming the genetic code. EMBO J. 30, 2312–2324. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.160
Craik, D. J., Fairlie, D. P., Liras, S., and Price, D. (2013). The future of peptide-based drugs. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 81, 136–147. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12055
Cromm, P. M., Spiegel, J., and Grossmann, T. N. (2015). Hydrocarbon stapled peptides as modulators of biological function. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1362–1375. doi: 10.1021/cb501020r
Daugherty, P. S. (2007). Protein engineering with bacterial display. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 474–480. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.07.004
Douthwaite, J. A., and Jackson, R. H. (2012). Ribosome Display and Related Technologies: Methods and Protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana.
Duerr, D. M., White, S. J., and Schluesener, H. J. (2004). Identification of peptide sequences that induce the transport of phage across the gastrointestinal mucosal barrier. J. Virol. Methods 116, 177–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2003.11.012
Eldridge, B., Cooley, R. N., Odegrip, R., McGregor, D. P., Fitzgerald, K. J., and Ullman, C. G. (2009). An in vitro selection strategy for conferring protease resistance to ligand binding peptides. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 22, 691–698. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzp052
Frenkel, D., and Solomon, B. (2002). Filamentous phage as vector-mediated antibody delivery to the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 5675–5679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072027199
Frost, J. R., Jacob, N. T., Papa, L. J., Owens, A. E., and Fasan, R. (2015). Ribosomal synthesis of macrocyclic peptides in vitro and in vivo mediated by genetically encoded aminothiol unnatural amino acids. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1805–1816. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00119
Gai, S. A., and Wittrup, K. D. (2007). Yeast surface display for protein engineering and characterization. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 467–473. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.08.012
Gao, C., Mao, S., Ditzel, H. J., Farnaes, L., Wirsching, P., Lerner, R. A., et al. (2002). A cell-penetrating peptide from a novel pVII-pIX phage-displayed random peptide library. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10, 4057–4065. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0896(02)00340-1
Geysen, H. M., and Mason, T. J. (1993). Screening chemically synthesized peptide libraries for biologically-relevant molecules. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 3, 397–404. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(01)80221-3
Giordanetto, F., and Kihlberg, J. (2014). Macrocyclic drugs and clinical candidates: what can medicinal chemists learn from their properties? J. Med. Chem. 57, 278–295. doi: 10.1021/jm400887j
Giordano, R. J., Cardó-Vila, M., Salameh, A., Anobom, C. D., Zeitlin, B. D., Hawke, D. H., et al. (2010). From combinatorial peptide selection to drug prototype (I): targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 5112–5117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915141107
Goto, Y., Ito, Y., Kato, Y., Tsunoda, S., and Suga, H. (2014). One-pot synthesis of azoline-containing peptides in a cell-free translation system integrated with a posttranslational cyclodehydratase. Chem. Biol. 21, 766–774. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.04.008
Goto, Y., Katoh, T., and Suga, H. (2011). Flexizymes for genetic code reprogramming. Nat. Protoc. 6, 779–790. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.331
Gould, A., Ji, Y., Aboye, T. L., and Camarero, J. A. (2011). Cyclotides, a novel ultrastable polypeptide scaffold for drug discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 17, 4294–4307. doi: 10.2174/138161211798999438
Greenwood, K. P., Daly, N. L., Brown, D. L., Stow, J. L., and Craik, D. J. (2007). The cyclic cystine knot miniprotein MCoTI-II is internalized into cells by macropinocytosis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39, 2252–2264. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.06.016
Hamzeh-Mivehroud, M., Alizadeh, A. A., Morris, M. B., Church, W. B., and Dastmalchi, S. (2013). Phage display as a technology delivering on the promise of peptide drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 18, 1144–1157. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.09.001
Hanes, J., and Plückthun, A. (1997). In vitro selection and evolution of functional proteins by using ribosome display. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 4937–4942.
Hartman, M. C., Josephson, K., Lin, C. W., and Szostak, J. W. (2007). An expanded set of amino acid analogs for the ribosomal translation of unnatural peptides. PLoS ONE 2:e972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000972
Heinis, C., Rutherford, T., Freund, S., and Winter, G. (2009). Phage-encoded combinatorial chemical libraries based on bicyclic peptides. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 502–507. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.184
Hofmann, F. T., Szostak, J. W., and Seebeck, F. P. (2012). In vitro selection of functional lantipeptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 8038–8041. doi: 10.1021/ja302082d
Hoogenboom, H. R. (2005). Selecting and screening recombinant antibody libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1105–1116. doi: 10.1038/nbt1126
Jagadish, K., Gould, A., Borra, R., Majumder, S., Mushtaq, Z., Shekhtman, A., et al. (2015). Recombinant expression and phenotypic screening of a bioactive cyclotide against alpha-synuclein-induced cytotoxicity in baker's yeast. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 8390–8394. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501186
Jin, L., and Harrison, S. C. (2002). Crystal structure of human calcineurin complexed with cyclosporin A and human cyclophilin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 13522–13526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212504399
Kaspar, A. A., and Reichert, J. M. (2013). Future directions for peptide therapeutics development. Drug Discov. Today 18, 807–817. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.011
Kessler, H., Köck, M., Wein, T., and Gehrke, M. (1990). Reinvestigation of the conformation of cyclosporin A in chloroform. Helv. Chim. Acta 73, 1818–1832.
Knerr, P. J., and van der Donk, W. A. (2012). Discovery, biosynthesis, and engineering of lantipeptides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 479–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060110-113521
Ko, S. Y., and Dalvit, C. (1992). Conformation of cyclosporin A in polar solvents. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 40, 380–382.
Kritzer, J. A., Hamamichi, S., McCaffery, J. M., Santagata, S., Naumann, T. A., Caldwell, K. A., et al. (2009). Rapid selection of cyclic peptides that reduce alpha-synuclein toxicity in yeast and animal models. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 655–663. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.193
Krumpe, L. R., and Mori, T. (2007). Potential of phage-displayed peptide library technology to identify functional targeting peptides. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2, 525. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2.4.525
Lam, K. S., Hruby, V. J., Lebl, M., Knapp, R. J., Kazmierski, W. M., Hersh, E. M., et al. (1993). The chemical synthesis of large random peptide libraries and their use for the discovery of ligands for macromolecular acceptors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 3, 419–424. doi: 10.1016/S0960-894X(01)80224-9
Levin, A. M., and Weiss, G. A. (2006). Optimizing the affinity and specificity of proteins with molecular display. Mol. Biosyst. 2, 49–57. doi: 10.1039/b511782h
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., and Feeney, P. J. (2001). Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 46, 3–26. doi: 10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00423-1
Loosli, H. R., Kessler, H., Oschkinat, H., Weber, H. P., Petcher, T. J., and Widmer, A. (1985). The conformation of cyclosporin A in the crystal and in solution. Helv. Chim. Acta 68, 682–704.
Macdougall, I. C., Rossert, J., Casadevall, N., Stead, R. B., Duliege, A. M., Froissart, M., et al. (2009). A peptide-based erythropoietin-receptor agonist for pure red-cell aplasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1848–1855. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074037
Mattheakis, L. C., Bhatt, R. R., and Dower, W. J. (1994). An in vitro polysome display system for identifying ligands from very large peptide libraries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 9022–9026.
McLafferty, M. A., Kent, R. B., Ladner, R. C., and Markland, W. (1993). M13 bacteriophage displaying disulfide-constrained microproteins. Gene 128, 29–36.
Millward, S. W., Fiacco, S., Austin, R. J., and Roberts, R. W. (2007). Design of cyclic peptides that bind protein surfaces with antibody-like affinity. ACS Chem. Biol. 2, 625–634. doi: 10.1021/cb7001126
Millward, S. W., Takahashi, T. T., and Roberts, R. W. (2005). A general route for post-translational cyclization of mRNA display libraries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 14142–14143. doi: 10.1021/ja054373h
Nemoto, N., Miyamoto-Sato, E., Husimi, Y., and Yanagawa, H. (1997). In vitro virus: bonding of mRNA bearing puromycin at the 3′-terminal end to the C-terminal end of its encoded protein on the ribosome in vitro. FEBS Lett. 414, 405–408.
Obrecht, D., C. E., Moehle, K., and Robinson, J. (2012). beta-Hairpin protein epitope mimetic technology in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 9, e1–e70. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2011.07.006
Odegrip, R., Coomber, D., Eldridge, B., Hederer, R., Kuhlman, P. A., Ullman, C., et al. (2004). CIS display: in vitro selection of peptides from libraries of protein-DNA complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 2806–2810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400219101
Ohta, A., Murakami, H., Higashimura, E., and Suga, H. (2007). Synthesis of polyester by means of genetic code reprogramming. Chem. Biol. 14, 1315–1322. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.10.015
Ohuchi, M., Murakami, H., and Suga, H. (2007). The flexizyme system: a highly flexible tRNA aminoacylation tool for the translation apparatus. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 11, 537–542. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.08.011
O'Neil, K. T., Hoess, R. H., Jackson, S. A., Ramachandran, N. S., Mousa, S. A., and DeGrado, W. F. (1992). Identification of novel peptide antagonists for GPIIb/IIIa from a conformationally constrained phage peptide library. Proteins 14, 509–515. doi: 10.1002/prot.340140411
Otvos, L. Jr., and Wade, J. D. (2014). Current challenges in peptide-based drug discovery. Front. Chem. 2:62. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2014.00062
Passioura, T., Katoh, T., Goto, Y., and Suga, H. (2014). Selection-based discovery of druglike macrocyclic peptides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 727–752. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060713-035456
Patel, S., Mathonet, P., Jaulent, A. M., and Ullman, C. G. (2013). Selection of a high-affinity WW domain against the extracellular region of VEGF receptor isoform-2 from a combinatorial library using CIS display. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 26, 307–315. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzt003
Rackham, O., and Chin, J. W. (2005). A network of orthogonal ribosome x mRNA pairs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 159–166. doi: 10.1038/nchembio719
Reichart, J. (2010). Development Trends for Peptide Therapeutics. 2010 Report. Available online at: http://www.peptidetherapeutics.org/
Reid, P. C., Goto, Y., Katoh, T., and Suga, H. (2012). Charging of tRNAs using ribozymes and selection of cyclic peptides containing thioethers. Methods Mol. Biol. 805, 335–348. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-379-0_19
Roberts, R. W., and Szostak, J. W. (1997). RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 12297–12302.
Rockberg, J., Löfblom, J., Hjelm, B., Uhlén, M., and Ståhl, S. (2008). Epitope mapping of antibodies using bacterial surface display. Nat. Methods 5, 1039–1045. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1272
Schlippe, Y. V., Hartman, M. C., Josephson, K., and Szostak, J. W. (2012). In vitro selection of highly modified cyclic peptides that act as tight binding inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 10469–10477. doi: 10.1021/ja301017y
Seebeck, F. P., Ricardo, A., and Szostak, J. W. (2011). Artificial lantipeptides from in vitro translations. Chem. Commun. 47, 6141–6143. doi: 10.1039/c0cc05663d
Sergeeva, A., Kolonin, M. G., Molldrem, J. J., Pasqualini, R., and Arap, W. (2006). Display technologies: application for the discovery of drug and gene delivery agents. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 58, 1622–1654. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.018
Shimizu, Y., Inoue, A., Tomari, Y., Suzuki, T., Yokogawa, T., Nishikawa, K., et al. (2001). Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 751–755. doi: 10.1038/90802
Shimizu, Y., Kanamori, T., and Ueda, T. (2005). Protein synthesis by pure translation systems. Methods 36, 299–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.04.006
Sidhu, S. S., Lowman, H. B., Cunningham, B. C., and Wells, J. A. (2000). Phage display for selection of novel binding peptides. Methods Enzymol. 328, 333–363.
Subtelny, A. O., Hartman, M. C., and Szostak, J. W. (2008). Ribosomal synthesis of N-methyl peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6131–6136. doi: 10.1021/ja710016v
Subtelny, A. O., Hartman, M. C., and Szostak, J. W. (2011). Optimal codon choice can improve the efficiency and fidelity of N-methyl amino acid incorporation into peptides by in-vitro translation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50, 3164–3167. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007686
Ullman, C. G., Frigotto, L., and Cooley, R. N. (2011). In vitro methods for peptide display and their applications. Brief. Funct. Genomics 10, 125–134. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elr010
Veber, D. F., Johnson, S. R., Cheng, H. Y., Smith, B. R., Ward, K. W., and Kopple, K. D. (2002). Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 45, 2615–2623. doi: 10.1021/jm020017n
Wang, C. K., Northfield, S. E., Swedberg, J. E., Colless, B., Chaousis, S., Price, D. A., et al. (2015). Exploring experimental and computational markers of cyclic peptides: charting islands of permeability. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 97, 202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.049
White, T. R., Renzelman, C. M., Rand, A. C., Rezai, T., McEwen, C. M., Gelev, V. M., et al. (2011). On-resin N-methylation of cyclic peptides for discovery of orally bioavailable scaffolds. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 810–817. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.664
Wrighton, N. C., Farrell, F. X., Chang, R., Kashyap, A. K., Barbone, F. P., Mulcahy, L. S., et al. (1996). Small peptides as potent mimetics of the protein hormone erythropoietin. Science 273, 458–464.
Keywords: directed evolution, display systems, peptide drug discovery, peptides and derivatives, stability, non-natural amino acids, cyclic peptides
Citation: Goldflam M and Ullman CG (2015) Recent Advances Toward the Discovery of Drug-Like Peptides De novo. Front. Chem. 3:69. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2015.00069
Received: 28 September 2015; Accepted: 30 November 2015;
Published: 18 December 2015.
Edited by:
Maxim Ryadnov, National Physical Laboratory, UKReviewed by:
Reik Löser, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, GermanyDilip K. Maiti, Detroit Medical Center-School of Medicine, USA
Copyright © 2015 Goldflam and Ullman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Christopher G. Ullman, chris.ullman@paratopix.com
†These authors co-wrote the manuscript.