
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Chem. Eng.
Sec. Environmental Chemical Engineering
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fceng.2025.1537880
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This work focuses on understanding the impact of uncertainties in the solvent property submodel on the design and cost of the solvent-based CO2 capture process. First, a deterministic model of the MEA-based CO2 capture process using the CEMCAP reference cement plant case was developed and validated in the CO2SIM flowsheet simulator. Subsequently, a stochastic approach using the Monte Carlo simulation framework was applied by coupling the validated process model and UQLab, a MATLAB®-based uncertainty quantification toolbox. Based on this, the implications of these uncertainties on key performance indicators are derived: CO2 capture ratio, specific reboiler duty, reboiler duty, condenser duty, lean rich heat exchanger duty, lean and rich loading. Finally, the impact of these uncertainties on equipment design and the CO2 avoidance cost are assessed and discussed. The result highlighted that heat exchanger duty uncertainty falls within the overdesign margin commonly used in engineering practice. However, the CO2 avoidance cost exhibits significant uncertainty linked to solvent properties (~5.2%) that are mainly linked to uncertainty in the CO2 capture ratio. Hence, a key element in reducing CO2 avoidance cost uncertainty may well be to validate suitable absorber height to guarantee, with a reasonable confidence, a 90% capture ratio via pilot testing.
Keywords: Stochastic Modeling, uncertainty quantification, monte carlo, Economics, CO2 capture
Received: 01 Dec 2024; Accepted: 28 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kuncheekanna, Roussanaly and Gardarsdottir. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Vishalini Nair Kuncheekanna, NTNU, Trondheim, 7491, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway
Simon Roussanaly, SINTEF Energy Research, Trondheim, Norway
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.