Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Cell. Neurosci., 10 March 2023
Sec. Cellular Neurophysiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders: The Role of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis (CME) and Related Intracellular Trafficking View all 6 articles

Editorial: Neurological and psychiatric disorders: The role of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) and related intracellular trafficking

\nIsabella Zanella,Isabella Zanella1,2James A. DanielJames A. Daniel3Daniela Zizioli
Daniela Zizioli1*
  • 1Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
  • 2Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Section of Cytogenetics and Molecular Genetics, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
  • 3Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen, Germany

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is a cellular fundamental process in which cargo molecules are internalized from the cell surface and trafficked into vesicles within the cell. In keeping with cargo diversity, CME has different physiological functions, from molecule uptake, receptor internalization, signal transduction, synaptic vesicle recycling (SVR). Clathrin is also essential in intracellular trafficking of membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), trans Golgi Network (TGN), endosomes, lysosomes, and plasma membrane.

CME is particularly essential for neural functions. Evidence of its crucial functions is that its dysregulations are common hallmarks of several neurological diseases.

The aim of this Issue was to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of CME and related intracellular trafficking in neurological and psychiatric diseases. Several researchers contributed interesting point of views, focusing on diseases caused by mutations in proteins involved in these pathways and reviewing different aspects of their dysregulation.

In the CME process two key endocytic proteins play important roles: clathrin and dynamin. Small molecules inhibitors can interact with both proteins resulting in the inhibition of the CME process. This inhibition might be used as a potential therapeutic target on neurological and psychiatric disorders. Dynamin 2 (DNM2) belongs to the dynamin family of large GTPases that catalyze membrane constriction and fission during multiple cellular processes including endocytosis. DNM2 consists of an N-terminal GTPase domain; a middle domain that mediates dimerization; a pleckstrin homology domain (PHD) that binds to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate (PIP2); a GTPase effector domain (GED) regulating GTPase activity and a C-terminal proline/arginine-rich domain (PRD) that interacts with proteins containing the Src homology 3 domain. The middle and the GED domains form the stalk mediating DNM2 self-assembly. Assembly is regulated through conformational changes induced by PIP2 binding resulting in a closed-to-open conformational switch. On the other hand, clathrin has a complicated structure and its activity requires the assembly of a macromolecular complex, a triskelion. Since long time clathrin have been well-characterized (Pearse, 1975), having a central role in CME, mitosis and SVR. In this Issue, Prichard et al. well-described the important role of clathrin and suggested CME as one of the major mechanisms for SVR in neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD), epilepsy, schizophrenia. In the area of these neurological diseases drug development has focused primarily on postsynaptic targets and G-protein coupled receptors, leaving the investigation of endocytic machinery as potential drug targets an unexplored but promising field. Recently the discovery of molecules able to inhibit CME highlighted its potential medical importance. Generic approaches to CME inhibition include environmental stimuli which acts as general cellular perturbant such as cytosolic acidification, potassium depletion, hypertonic treatment, and small molecules as monodansylcadaverine, chloroquine, ikarugamycin.

DNM2 mutations mainly occurs in its PHD domain: those causing centronuclear myopathy (CNM) disrupt the closed conformation, enhancing self-assembly and GTPase activity without affecting PIP2 binding (gain of function), while those associated with Charcot Marie Tooth disease (CMT) inhibit PIP2 binding and PIP2 stimulated GTPase activity, resulting in self-assembly inhibition (loss of function). Tassin et al. elegantly showed that one CMT-causing mutation, lacking residues 555DEE557 (ΔDEE), did not alter PIP2 binding and conferred resistance to in vitro disassembly, stabilizing DNM2 polymers, similarly to CNM-causing mutations. On the converse, the mutation did not induce DNM2 oligomerization in living cells. The authors also showed that the mutation, probably acting on the protein conformation, enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation in cells expressing c-Src, compared to wild-type DNM2 or protein harboring CNM- or CMT-linked known mutations. The authors concluded that molecular mechanisms underlying DNM2 mutations should be further deepened.

Snead and Gowrishankar focused their study on Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 8 Interacting Protein 3 (MAPK8IP3), a putative adaptor protein that in neurons is believed to link lysosomes to dynein and kinesin motors during retrograde axonal transport. In all studied animal models, the loss of this protein results in axonal lysosome accumulation. De novo variants in MAPK8IP3 have been found in children with neurodevelopmental disorders and intellectual disability. A study in C. elegans of some of these variants showed that while two of them resulted in axonal lysosome accumulation, further variants affected worm locomotion (Platzer et al., 2019), suggesting that MAPK8IP3 may be involved in further cellular processes. With this aim, the authors observed the effects of MAPK8IP3 knocking out in neurons derived from induced pluripotent stem cells and found that loss of MAPK8IP3 resulted in axonal lysosome accumulation, as previously observed. More interestingly, they also observed that the cells did not reduce lysosomal proteolytic activity but exhibited defective endocytic activity, revealing a potential new cellular role for the protein.

In their comprehensive review, Deo and Redpath extensively described the endocytic regulation of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptophan, 5-HT) transporter (SERT) and 5-HT receptors, particularly focusing on 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors and their roles in 5-HT extracellular levels and depression or anxiety. The authors also detailed how selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) modulate 5-HT signaling through endocytosis. Through a detailed description of genetic, transcriptomic and proteomic changes associated with depression and anxiety, they provided an in-depth overview of endocytic dysregulation in those psychiatric conditions. Finally, the authors proposed an interesting model of how genetic, transcriptomic and proteomic changes in patients with depression and anxiety could perturb endocytosis of 5-HT and SERT.

Finally, Smith et al. showed that α-synuclein, a central component of the characteristic cell death in PD, can propagate in neurons and that a combination of environmental and genetic factors are thought to contribute to the development of PD. Different studies suggested that α-synuclein is internalized via CME beginning with α-synuclein accumulating on the plasma membrane. Inhibition of α-synuclein aggregation is the new model of treatment and eventual prevention of neurodegeneration in PD patients. The analysis of different uptake and clearance system highlights the importance for further understanding of α-synuclein trafficking and its biology. Protein, uptake, trafficking and clearance is a vital pathway to understand PD pathogenesis and is a key target for therapeutic intervention.

In conclusion, many questions are still open to better understand the role of CME in neurological and psychiatric disorders. This Research Topic of reviews and articles raises crucial issues to be considered in this fascinating research field.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to manuscript preparation and approved it for publication.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all authors that contributed to the success of the Topic Issue, allowing us to provide the readers an updated overview on this matter. We wish also to thank all reviewers, that highly contributed with their knowledge and useful advice, and all members of the Editorial Office that, with their professionalism, helped us in the management of this Research Topic.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Pearse, B. M. (1975). Coated vesicles from pig brain: purification and biochemical characterization. J. Mol. Biol. 97, 93–98. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80024-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Platzer, K., Sticht, H., Edwards, S. L., Allen, W., Angione, K. M., Bonati, M. T., et al. (2019). De novo variants in MAPK8IP3 cause intellectual disability with variable brain anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 104, 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.12.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), clathrin coated vesicles, intracellular trafficking, neurological disorders, psychiatric disorders

Citation: Zanella I, Daniel JA and Zizioli D (2023) Editorial: Neurological and psychiatric disorders: The role of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) and related intracellular trafficking. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 17:1165675. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1165675

Received: 14 February 2023; Accepted: 21 February 2023;
Published: 10 March 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Enrico Cherubini, European Brain Research Institute, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Zanella, Daniel and Zizioli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Daniela Zizioli, daniela.zizioli@unibs.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.