ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Antibiotic Resistance and New Antimicrobial drugs

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1597009

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Bacteriophage Research & Development with Therapeutic ApplicationsView all 4 articles

Systematic bacteriophage selection for the lysis of multiple Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany
  • 2Institute of Microbiology, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Bavaria, Germany
  • 3German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Berlin, Germany
  • 4Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Department Trauma & Orthopedic Surgery, Septic & Reconstructive Surgery, Research and Treatment Center Septic Defect Wounds, Berlin, Germany
  • 5Central Facility for Microscopy, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centers (HZ), Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • 6Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Braunschweig, Berlin, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen causing severe infections of the lung, burn wounds and eyes. Due to its intrinsic high antibiotic resistance the bacterium is difficult to eradicate. A promising therapeutic option is the use of P. aeruginosa-specific bacteriophages. Thus, the implementation of a phage therapy requires their selection, production and systematic administration using multiple strains of the bacterial target. Here, we used 25 phages and tested their susceptibility on 141 different P. aeruginosa strains isolated from patients with different types of infection. Comparative host spectrum analyses were carried out using double agar overlay plaque assay (DPA) and planktonic killing assay (PKA), which resulted in 70% of the cases in the same host range. All phages were assigned to known phage genera, but some of the phages are new species. Isolated members of the genera Pakpunavirus, Pbunavirus (myoviruses), Pawinskivirus, Elvirus (myoviruses, jumbo phages), Litunavirus and Bruynoghevirus (podoviruses) demonstrated great therapeutic potential due to strong lysis behavior on diverse strains. Seven phages were excluded for therapeutic purposes due to genetic determinants that confer lysogenicity. Due to automation with lower time expenditure in execution and analysis, PKA has the higher potential for implementation in diagnostics. Finally, different combinations of phages were tested in silico with various P. aeruginosa strains. Highly efficient phage combinations eradicating multiple P. aeruginosa strains were found. Thus, a solid basis for the development of a broad host range phage therapy was laid.

Keywords: bacteriophages1, Pseudomonas aeruginosa2, phage susceptibility testing3, antibiotic-resistance4, phage selection5

Received: 20 Mar 2025; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Rieper, Wittmann, Bunk, Spröer, Häfner, Willy, Müsken, Ziehr, Korf and Jahn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Finja Rieper, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany
Imke H. E. Korf, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Braunschweig, Germany
Dieter Jahn, Braunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology (BRICS), Braunschweig, 38106, Berlin, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more