ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical Infectious Diseases

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1579827

This article is part of the Research TopicUnveiling Distinctions: Active Tuberculosis versus Latent Tuberculosis Infection - Immunological Insights, Biomarkers, and Innovative ApproachesView all 6 articles

Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Model for Tuberculous Meningitis Based on Laboratory Data

Provisionally accepted
Fuyong  LiuFuyong Liu1*Zheng  LiZheng Li2Li  XuejiaoLi Xuejiao1Wei  HongWei Hong1Yanlin  ZhouYanlin Zhou1YUNGANG  HANYUNGANG HAN2SHUANG  XIASHUANG XIA2Jiao  TanJiao Tan2Yunchang  YangYunchang Yang1Shiqi  LiShiqi Li1Zhi  LiZhi Li1Wenyi  HeWenyi He2Huihui  ChenHuihui Chen2Pengxiang  LiPengxiang Li2Yali  WangYali Wang2Xu  YangXu Yang2Jingcai  GaoJingcai Gao2Wei  WangWei Wang2*
  • 1Sanquan College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China
  • 2Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: We developed and validated a diagnostic scoring system for tuberculous meningitis (TBM) using 13 laboratory parameters, comparing tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and non-tuberculous meningitis (non-TBM).Methods: This study enrolled patients diagnosed with meningitis. We retrospectively collected and analyzed demographic data (gender, age) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters, including biochemical profiles and white blood cell counts with differential analysis. Variable selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set. A diagnostic prediction model was developed using logistic regression in the training set, with nomograms constructed to visually demonstrate the diagnostic relationships. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to assess the clinical utility of the model. Finally, the diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated in the validation set.Results: A total of 254 patients with meningitis were included in this study. LASSO regression analysis identified four predictive variables: CSF glucose, CSF chloride, CSF protein and CSF mononuclear cells proportion. These parameters were incorporated into a logistic regression model, with weighted factors generating a diagnostic score. A score of ≥ 3 was suggestive of TBM with a sensitivity of 76.10% and a specificity of 84.10%, and the area under the curve (AUC) values was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.91). Both calibration curves and DCA validated the robust performance of model.We developed and validated a clinically applicable diagnostic model for TBM using routinely available and low-cost CSF parameters. Our findings demonstrated that this scoring system provided reliable TBM diagnosis, particularly in countries and regions with limited microbial and radiological resources.

Keywords: tuberculous meningitis, Diagnostic model, Validation, non-tuberculous meningitis, nomogram, Laboratory data

Received: 19 Feb 2025; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Li, Xuejiao, Hong, Zhou, HAN, XIA, Tan, Yang, Li, Li, He, Chen, Li, Wang, Yang, Gao and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Fuyong Liu, Sanquan College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan Province, China
Wei Wang, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.