ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical Infectious Diseases

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1561468

This article is part of the Research TopicUnravelling Host-Pathogen Interactions in Bacterial Infection: Insights from Omics and Machine LearningView all 6 articles

Clinical application of Metagenomic next-generation sequencing in etiologic diagnosis of severe pneumonia in adults

Provisionally accepted
Zhen-Chuan  XingZhen-Chuan XingHua-Zheng  GuoHua-Zheng GuoPeng  ZhenPeng ZhenTing  AoTing AoMing  HuMing Hu*
  • Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

To analyze the clinical characteristics and risk factors for death of severe pneumonia (SP) in adults and explore the application value of metagenomic nextgeneration sequencing in the detection of pathogens.: A total of 132 adult patients with SP admitted from May 2021 to October 2023 were selected. Data on gender, age, smoking, underlying diseases, laboratory tests and prognosis were collected. BALF samples were sent for mNGS, smear-stained microscopy and culture. Meanwhile, conventional methods were used for pathogen detection of blood, urine and throat swab specimens. The detection efficiencies of different methods were compared and the associated pathogen profiles were analyzed. Results: Among the 132 patients, there were 92 males and 40 females, with a total of 52 deaths. Age≥65 years, heart failure, renal insufficiency, positive of COVID-19, use of vasoactive drugs, use of mechanical ventilation and use of CRRT were statistically different between the survivors and non-survivors. Heart failure (OR=4.751) and use of mechanical ventilation (OR=11.914) were risk factors of SP mortality. The bacteria detected were mainly Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The fungi detected were mainly Candida and Aspergillus.The viruses detected were mainly COVID-19 and influenza virus. The positive rate of mNGS was higher than conventional methods in both bacteria, fungus and virus (82.58% vs 63.64%, 50.76% vs 37.88% and 67.42% vs 37.88%, respectively) (P<0.05). The sensitivity and accuracy of mNGS in bacterial detection were significantly higher than traditional methods (P<0.05). Compared to culture, mNGS detected more Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Escherichia coli, and had a significant advantage in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex , Nontuberculous mycobacterial, Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia psittaci, Pneumocystis jirovecii and Aspergillus. Moreover, mNGS can better indicate mixed infections of bacteria, viruses, or fungi.Elderly people with chronic diseases were the main group of severe pneumonia in adults. The pathogenic microorganisms that caused SP are complex, and mixed infection is common. mNGS enhanced the effectiveness of pathogen detection, makes up for the shortcomings of conventional methods, especially in identifying unexpected pathogens, and provides a new means for early targeted anti-infection treatment.

Keywords: Severe pneumonia, adults, Metagenomics, Next-generation sequencing, Pathogen Detection

Received: 17 Jan 2025; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xing, Guo, Zhen, Ao and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ming Hu, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more