
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Antibiotic Resistance and New Antimicrobial drugs
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1547250
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances in Bacteriophage Research & Development with Therapeutic Applications View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Fracture-related infections (FRI), particularly those caused by antibiotic resistant Staphylococcus aureus, present significant clinical challenges due to the formation of biofilm on the implanted device, and reduced options for conventional antibiotic treatment. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy (PT) offers a targeted approach to managing such infections, however, evidence for pharmacokinetics and optimal route of administration is limited for FRI. This study aimed to evaluate safety, phage distribution kinetics, phage neutralization, and antibacterial efficacy after intravenous or local administration in a sheep model. Methods: The study was conducted in two phases: Phase 1 assessed the safety and distribution of two successive rounds of intravenous and local phage administration in non-infected sheep, while Phase 2 evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of intravenous versus local phage administration in combination with intravenous vancomycin in treating MRSA-induced FRI (tibial osteotomy with plate fixation). The specific pathogen and phage used in the sheep were both taken from a human FRI patient treated with PT. Phage neutralization and phage distribution were the primary outcomes measured in both phases of the sheep study.Results: Both intravenous and local phage administration were well-tolerated in non-infected sheep. Phages were cleared rapidly from circulation after intravenous administration, with no phage detected after 240 minutes. Phage neutralization increased during PT, peaking at 99.9% in non-inoculated sheep by the end of the second phage treatment (day 50). In infected sheep, phage neutralization levels reached a maximum of 99.9% earlier (day 13), with no significant differences between intravenous and local administration. The bacterial load was not significantly changed by PT, either IV or locally applied.Conclusions: PT is a safe adjunct to antibiotic treatment for FRI, however, phage neutralization developed rapidly and was accelerated in infected hosts. Further research is required to optimize phage selection, dosing, and delivery methods to enhance its therapeutic potential as an adjunct to conventional antibiotic therapy, particularly in the face of challenges such as rapid clearance and phage neutralization.
Keywords: Bacteriophage, Fracture related infection, MRSA, pharmacokinetics, Administration, neutralization, Osteomyelitis, Staphylococcus aureus
Received: 18 Dec 2024; Accepted: 19 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Peez, Chen, Henssler, Chitto, Onsea, Verhofstad, Arens, Constant, Zeiter, Obremskey, Trampuz, Raeschke, Zalavras, Metsemakers, MD, PhD and Moriarty. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Fintan Thomas Moriarty, AO Research Institute, Davos, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.