
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Clinical Infectious Diseases
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1532289
This article is part of the Research Topic Assessing Nosocomial Fungal Infections: Virulence and Resistance Dynamics View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study investigated the susceptibility of various Fusarium fungi to five topical antifungal agents: natamycin, voriconazole, chlorhexidine, natamycin combined with chlorhexidine, and voriconazole combined with chlorhexidine. A total of 194 Fusarium strains isolated from corneal samples were collected from 2013 to 2024 and identified at the species level using mass spectrometry. F. solani, F. oxysporum, and F. keratoplasticum were the main isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data were collected to guide clinical application. The MIC values for natamycin in F. solani species complex (FSSC) and F. fujikuroi species complex (FFSC) were 2-8 and 2-8 μg/mL, respectively. The MICs for FSSC and FFSC respectively ranged from 0.25-16 and 1-8 μg/mL for voriconazole and 2 to > 16 μg/mL and 1 to > 16 μg/mL for chlorhexidine. The MICs of natamycin were not significantly different between FSSC and FFSC. However, voriconazole, chlorhexidine, natamycin combined with chlorhexidine, and voriconazole combined with chlorhexidine had significantly higher MICs for FSSC compared with FFSC. Compared with voriconazole, voriconazole combined with chlorhexidine exhibited enhancement of antifungal activity against 100% of tested Fusarium strains. Compared with natamycin, enhancement of antifungal activity of natamycin combined with chlorhexidine was 81.4% for all Fusarium spp., and the activity were significantly lower for F. solani (65.9%) than for non-F. solani species (93.6%). This highlights the need to identify Fusarium spp. when using ophthalmic medications. The MICs of topical antifungal drugs showed no significant increase from 2013 to 2024. These results lay the foundation for multicenter studies of epidemiological cutoff value. Through the prospective observation of clinical efficacy in five patients, the feasibility of treating Fusarium keratitis with topical natamycin combined with chlorhexidine and chlorhexidine alone was also evaluated. Four of the patients achieved clinical cure; the fourth presented with full corneal ulceration, after the opportunity for early drug treatment had passed, and required corneal transplantation. The findings of this study pave the way for multicenter research on the treatment of fungal keratitis with natamycin combined with chlorhexidine.
Keywords: Fungal keratitis, Fusarium spp., antifungal susceptibility, Chlorhexidine, Clinical efficacy observation
Received: 21 Nov 2024; Accepted: 26 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Min, Wu, Shi, Wang, Zhang, Chen, Xu, Zhou, LIANG and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xinxin Lu, Department of Laboratory Medicine,Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100005, China., Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.