Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

Sec. Clinical Microbiology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1530486

This article is part of the Research Topic Pathogenic Mechanisms and New Technology-Based Diagnostics for Bacterial Infections View all 4 articles

A retrospective analysis comparing metagenomic next-generation sequencing(mNGS) with conventional microbiology testing (CMT) for the identification of pathogens in patients with severe infections

Provisionally accepted
Fei Hou Fei Hou 1,2Yanting Qiao Yanting Qiao 3Yuanyuan Qiao Yuanyuan Qiao 3Ya Shi Ya Shi 3Mingrui Chen Mingrui Chen 3Min Kong Min Kong 1,2Xiaohang Hu Xiaohang Hu 2Liqing Jiang Liqing Jiang 2Xiaowei Liu Xiaowei Liu 3*
  • 1 Jining Medical University, Jining, China
  • 2 Department of Clinical Laboratory, the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China
  • 3 Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The application value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting pathogenic bacteria was evaluated to promote the rational and accurate use of antibiotics. A total of 180 patients with severe infections were included in this study. Based on their different symptoms, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) or blood samples were collected for conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS. The results indicated that the etiological diagnosis rate of mNGS (78.89%) was significantly higher than that of CMT (20%) (p<0.001). Notably, mNGS exhibited greater sensitivity towards rare pathogens such as Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and Legionella pneumophila, which were undetectable by CMT. Additionally, 64 cases underwent blood culture, BALF culture, and mNGS testing.Analysis revealed that the positive rate of blood culture (3.1%) was lower than that of BALF (25%), and the positive rate of CMT from both types was significantly lower than that of mNGS (89.1%) (p<0.001). In this study, 168 mNGS results were accepted, and 116 patients had their antibiotic therapy adjustment based on mNGS. Paired analysis indicated that white blood cell count (WBC), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and neutrophil (NEU) percentage provided valuable therapeutic guidance. The survival rate of patients was 55.36%, influenced by patient physical condition and age. Our data indicated that mNGS had significant auxiliary value in the clinical diagnosis and treatment for critically ill patients, especially for those with negative CMT results and clinically undefined infections. mNGS could broaden the detection scope, especially for special pathogens, and improve the detection rate, providing powerful assistance for early clinical diagnosis and treatment.

    Keywords: metagenomic next-generation sequencing, Detection of pathogens, Severe infections, Bronchial alveolar lavage fluid, Blood, conventional microbiological testing

    Received: 19 Nov 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Hou, Qiao, Qiao, Shi, Chen, Kong, Hu, Jiang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaowei Liu, Department of Critical Care Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more