
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Clinical Infectious Diseases
Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1529532
This article is part of the Research Topic Emerging Mechanisms of Host-Pathogen Interactions and immune responses View all 4 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: This study aimed to establish the reference range of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte absolute ratio (NLR) in healthy individuals, explore the association between NLR and post-trauma nosocomial infections, and evaluate the effectiveness of NLR in predicting clinical outcomes of post-trauma infections. Methods: The reference range of NLR was established, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for infection, with subgroup analysis conducted by age. The predictive value of NLR for post-trauma infections was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: A total of 175,019 individuals were included, comprising 165,504 healthy individuals (753 minors [0.45%, <18 years] and 164,751 adults [99.55%]) and 9,515 acute trauma patients (8,602 in the control group [90.40%] and 913 with post-trauma infections [9.60%]). The 95% reference range for NLR was 0.69-3.48 in minors and 0.86-3.83 in adults. NLR was identified as an independent risk factor for post-trauma infections, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.18-1.73). Additionally, NLR showed a positive correlation with common inflammatory markers, CRP (r = 0.37 [0.32-0.42], weak correlation) and PCT (r = 0.52 [0.45-0.58], moderate correlation). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that NLR had an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.69-0.73, P < 0.0001) for predicting infections, with a diagnostic cutoff value of 4, sensitivity of 60.28% (95% CI: 59.24-61.31), and specificity of 72.85% (95% CI: 69.71-75.77). No significant differences in NLR values were observed between groups with pulmonary infections, urinary tract infections, combined pulmonary and urinary infections, and soft tissue infections (P > 0.05). However, NLR values were significantly higher in patients with fungal infections compared to those without (P = 0.03). Conclusion: The current 95% reference range of NLR is 0.69-3.48 in minors and 0.86-3.83 in adults. With increasing age, the reference range widens, and females tend to have a slightly broader range than males. NLR is an independent risk factor for post-trauma infections, showing higher predictive value in patients over 60 years of age. Although NLR cannot differentiate infection sites or pathogen types, elevated NLR values may provide a reference for identifying fungal infections.
Keywords: NLR, Trauma, Infection, Risk factors, Reference range
Received: 20 Nov 2024; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Jiang, Jin, Gan, Li, Sun, Zhang, Pei, Zhang, Ye and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jingjing Ye, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
Tianbing Wang, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.