Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.
Sec. Clinical Microbiology
Volume 14 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1489792

Clinical evaluation of a multiplex droplet digital PCR for diagnosing suspected bloodstream infections: a prospective study

Provisionally accepted
Yaqin Peng Yaqin Peng 1*Ruijie Xie Ruijie Xie 2Yifeng Luo Yifeng Luo 2Penghao Guo Penghao Guo 1Zhongwen Wu Zhongwen Wu 1Yili Chen Yili Chen 1Pingjuan Liu Pingjuan Liu 1Jiankai Deng Jiankai Deng 1Bin Huang Bin Huang 1Kang Liao Kang Liao 1
  • 1 Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Though droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has emerged as a promising tool of early pathogen detection in bloodstream infections (BSIs), more studies are needed to support its clinical application widely due to different ddPCR platforms with discrepant diagnostic performance. Additionally, it is still a lack of clinical data to reveal the association of pathogen loads detected by ddPCR and corresponding BSIs. Methods: In this prospective study, 173 patients with suspected BSIs were enrolled. A multiplex ddPCR assay was used to detect 18 pathogens. The results of ddPCR testing were evaluated in comparison with blood cultures (BCs) and clinical diagnosis. Taking BC as the gold standard, receiver operating characteristic curve and Cohen’s kappa agreement were used to investigate whether the pathogen load could predict corresponding culture-proven BSI for the top five microorganisms detected by ddPCR. Results: Of the 173 blood samples collected, BC and ddPCR were positive in 48 (27.7%) and 92 (53.2%) cases, respectively. Compared to BCs, the aggregate sensitivity and specificity for ddPCR were 81.3% and 63.2%, respectively. By clinical adjudication, the sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR increased to 88.8% and 86.0%, respectively. There were 143 microorganisms detected by ddPCR. The DNA loads of these microorganisms ranged from 30.0 to 3.2×105 copies/mL (median level: 158.0 copies/mL), 72.7% (104/143) of which were below 1,000 copies/mL. Further, statistical analysis showed the DNA loads of Escherichia coli (AUC: 0.954, 95% CI: 0.898-1.000, κ=0.731, cut-off values: 93.0 copies/mL) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (AUC: 0.994, 95% CI: 0.986-1.000, κ=0.834, cut-off values: 196.5 copies/mL) were excellent predictors for corresponding BSIs. The DNA loads of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AUC: 0.816, 95% CI: 0.560-1.000, κ=0.167), Acinetobacter baumannii (AUC: 0.728, 95% CI: 0.195-1.000), and Enterococcus spp. (AUC: 0.282, 95% CI: 0.000-0.778) had little predictive values for corresponding culture-proven BSIs. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the multiplex ddPCR is a promising platform as an add-on complementary to conventional BC. The DNA loads of E. coli and K. pneumoniae present excellent predictive value for corresponding BSIs. Further research is needed to explore the predictive potential of ddPCR for other microorganisms.

    Keywords: Bloodstream infection, Blood culture, Droplet digital PCR, pathogen load, Predictive Value

    Received: 03 Sep 2024; Accepted: 13 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Peng, Xie, Luo, Guo, Wu, Chen, Liu, Deng, Huang and Liao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yaqin Peng, Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.