Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 19 June 2024
Sec. Veterinary and Zoonotic Infection
This article is part of the Research Topic Effects of Pathogen Parasitism on Host Metabolism in Aquaculture Animals View all 5 articles

Epidemiological investigation on diseases of Larimichthys crocea in Ningbo culture area

Shengwei Xu,,,&#x;Shengwei Xu1,2,3,4†Mingfeng Ge,,,&#x;Mingfeng Ge1,2,3,4†Juan FengJuan Feng2Xinxian WeiXinxian Wei1Honglian TanHonglian Tan1Zheng Liang*Zheng Liang1*Guixiang Tong*Guixiang Tong1*
  • 1China (Guangxi)-ASEAN Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Exploitation and Utilization of Aquatic Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanning, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Aquaculture Genetic and Breeding and Healthy Aquaculture of Guangxi, Guangxi Academy of Fishery Sciences, Nanning, China
  • 3Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangdong, China
  • 4Aquatic Disease Control Department, Ningbo Ocean and Fisheries Research Institute, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China

Introduction: Due to the high-density farming of Larimichthys crocea over the years, diseases caused by pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, and parasites frequently occur in Ningbo, posing a huge threat and challenge to the sustainable and healthy development of the L. crocea’s bay farming industry. In order to understand the diseases occurrence in L. crocea farming in Ningbo area, an epidemiological investigation of L. crocea diseases was carried out through regular sampling in 2023.

Methods: From April to October 2023, routine sampling of L. crocea was conducted monthly in various farming areas in Ningbo. Each time, live or dying L. crocea with obvious clinical symptoms were sampled, with a total number of 55 L. crocea collected. The samples were preserved in ice bags and transported to the laboratory for pathogen detection(including bacterial isolation and identification,virus identification, and parasites detection).

Results: A total of fifty-five fish dying L. crocea with obvious clinical symptoms were collected in this study, of which 78.18% (43/55) were detected with symptoms caused by pathogenic infection, while 21.82% (12/55) did not have identified pathogens, which were presumed to be breeding abrasions, nutritional metabolic disorders, unconventional pathogens infection or other reasons. A total of twenty-five pathogenic bacteria strains were isolated, which mainly were Pseudomonas plecoglossicida and Vibrio harveyi, accounting for 52% (13/25) and 32% (8/25) of the pathogenic bacteria strains, respectively. Among them, both V. harveyi and Streptococcus. iniae co-infected one fish. Additionally, three other bacterial strains including Nocardia seriolae, Staphylococcus Saprophyticus, and Photobacterium damselae subsp.damselae were isolated. Microscopic examination mainly observed two parasites, Cryptocaryon irritans and Neobenedenia girellae. In virus detection, the red sea bream iridovirus (RSIV) was mainly detected in L. crocea. Statistical analysis showed that among the fish with detected pathogens, 55.81% (24/43) had bacterial infections, 37.21% (16/43) had parasitic infections, and 37.21% (16/43) had RSIV infections. Among them, five fish had mixed infections of bacteria and parasites, three had mixed infections of bacteria and viruses, three had mixed infections of parasites and viruses, and one L. crocea had mixed infections of viruses, bacteria, and parasites.

Discussion: These findings indicate that these three major types of diseases are very common in the L. crocea farming area in Ningbo, implying the complexity of mixed infections of multiple diseases.

1 Introduction

Larimichthys crocea, also known as the large yellow croaker, belonged to the Perciformes, Sciaenidae, and Larimichthys. L. crocea is one of the China-specific marine economic fishes with its delicious meat, rich nutrition, and high protein (Shi et al., 2023).China Fishery Statistical Yearbook shows that the aquaculture production of L. crocea reached 257,700 tons in 2022, making it the highest yield of marine aquaculture fish in China (Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs et al., 2023).

Currently, the main cultivation models for L. crocea in China include bay cage farming, deep-sea (farming vessels), enclosure (block net) farming, and so on. The extensive development of deep-sea and enclosure farming models has played a positive role in the L. crocea industry, yet now these two farming models are still in the initial stage. Bay cage farming is still the main farming model, accounting for over 95% of the total production of L. crocea. Ningbo is one of the main farming areas for L. crocea in China. In 2023, the farming area of L. crocea in Ningbo reached over 200,000 m2, with an annual output of 4000 tons and a value of over 200 million yuan, forming a complete farming industry chain including breeding, seedling breeding, aquaculture production, and feed processing, with the main farming model of the bay farming. Due to the high-density farming over the years, the open water system has been severely damaged in Ningbo. Diseases caused by pathogens such as bacteria, viruses, and parasites frequently occur, posing a huge threat and challenge to the sustainable and healthy development of the L. crocea’s bay farming industry (Zhao et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2023).

This study conducted an epidemiological investigation on the main diseases of L. crocea in the bay farming area of Ningbo, attempting to reveal the harm, prevalence characteristics, as well as disease patterns of related diseases in this area to L. crocea, providing basic information for formulating effective prevention and control measures in this breeding areas.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Samples collection

From April to October 2023, routine sampling of L. crocea was conducted monthly in various farming areas in Ningbo (including Xiangshanxihu Port, Sanmen Bay, Fenghuashiyan Port, Ninghaibaishishan). Each time, live or dying L. crocea with obvious clinical symptoms were sampled, with a total number of 55 L. crocea collected. The samples were preserved in ice bags and transported to the laboratory for pathogen detection.

2.2 Bacterial isolation and identification

Under sterile conditions, tissues such as liver, spleen, and kidney of L. crocea were streaked onto the Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHI) solid medium and cultured at 28°C for 24–48 hours (Nocardia seriolae needs to be cultured for 5–7 days). Pick single colonies and purified them, and then bacterial DNA was extracted. PCR amplification detection was carried out using 16S universal primers (the upstream primer sequence: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′; the downstream primer sequence: 5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). The PCR reaction system included 12.5μL Taq master Mix, 8.5μL ddH2O, 1μL upstream primer,1μL downstream primer, and 2μL DNA template. The PCR reaction conditions were: 94°C for 2 minutes; 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds, 35 cycles; and 72°C for 2 minutes. The amplified products were detected using 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and sent to Hangzhou Youkang Biotechnology Co., LTD for sequencing. Sequences were blasted with the NCBI database for bacterial identification.

2.3 Virus identification

Diseased L. crocea were examined for three types of viruses, specifically including the infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV), red sea bream iridovirus (RSIV), and nervous necrosis virus (NNV). ISKNV detection was conducted according to the standard file of the People’s Republic of China Aquaculture Industry Standards SC/T 7216–2011. Specifically, the spleen and kidney tissues of L. crocea were collected, and the DNA extraction was performed using a genomic DNA extraction kit. Target sequence primers (Table 1) was used to PCR amplification, and agarose gel electrophoresis was used to verify the above-amplified products.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Virus detection primer information.

Refer to the People’s Republic of China National Standard GB/T36191–2018, RSIV was detected by collecting the tissues of the spleen, kidney, heart, intestine, and gill. After DNA extraction, PCR detection was performed with the following primer in Table 1. According to the standard file of the People’s Republic of China Aquaculture Industry Standards SC/T 7216–2012, the identification of NNV were executed by extracting the RNAs of brain tissues of L. crocea. After cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription, PCR amplification were performed with the corresponding primes (Table 1) and PCR products were determined by running agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.4 Parasites detection

Diseased L. crocea may be the result of a parasite infection, parasite detection is extremely necessary for taking effective measures to prevent the infection spread. The gill filaments, lesion ulceration sites, body attachments, or mucus of the sick L. crocea were sampled and then placed on slides with drops of sterile saline on them. After dispersing tissues with tweezers, coverslips were placed on top of tissues and slightly pressed flat, and then observed under a microscope.

3 Results

3.1 Pathogens detection statistics

In this study, a total of fifty-five L. crocea were collected, of which 78.18% (43/55) L. crocea were found to have disease-causing pathogens. The other L. crocea (21.82%) did not identify any pathogens, which possibly due to injuries in farming or nutritional metabolic disorders leading to death. Among L. crocea infected by the pathogens, twenty-four diseased fish had bacterial infections, sixteen fish was parasitic infection, and sixteen fish was virus infection. The overall proportions of various pathogens are shown in Figure 1. Those includes five diseased fish co-infected with bacteria and parasites, three fish co-infected with bacteria and viruses, and three fish co-infected with parasites and viruses. In addition, one L. crocea was infected by mixture of viruses, bacteria, and parasites (Figure 2).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Proportion of various pathogens in L. crocea.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Venn diagram of various pathogens in L. crocea.

3.2 Bacterial isolation

A total of 25 pathogenic bacteria were isolated from those above 24 diseased L. crocea. These pathogenic bacteria are mainly Pseudomonas plecoglossicida and Vibrio harveyi, accounting for 52% (13/25) and 32% (8/25) of the total bacterial strains, respectively (Figure 3). Beyond that, there is one L. crocea infected both by Streptococcus iniae and V. harveyi. Moreover, three other bacteria were also detected, they were Nocardia seriolae, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, and Photobacterium damselae, respectively (Table 2).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Species and abundance of bacteria.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Statistics of bacterial infection of L. crocea.

3.3 Parasite detection statistics

Among the above 55 L. crocea, a total of 16 were infected with parasites. Among them, 7 fish were infected with Cryptocaryon irritans(Figure 4), 6 fish were infected with Neobenedenia girellae (Figure 5), and 3 fish had mixed infections of C. irritans and N. girellae (Figure 6).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 C. irritans infected L. crocea.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 N. girellae infected L. crocea.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Venn diagram of parasites in L. crocea.

3.4 Mixed infections of parasites, bacteria, and virus

Among the seven C. irritans infected L. crocea mentioned above, three L. crocea were only infected by C. irritans, two L. crocea had mixed infections of C. irritans and P. plecoglossicida, one L. crocea had mixed infections of C. irritans and RSIV, and one L. crocea had mixed infections of three pathogens including C. irritans, RSIV, and V. harveyi (Figure 7).

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7 Waterfall diagram of C. irritans and its co-infection with the other pathogens in L. crocea. C. irritans means only the C. irritans infection in L. crocea; C. irritans - P. plecoglossicida means the co-infection of C. irritans and P. plecoglossicida; C. irritans -RSIV means the co-infection of C. irritans and RSIV; C. irritans- RSIV - V. harveyi means the co-infection of C. irritans, RSIV and V. harveyi.

Among the six N. girellae infected L. crocea mentioned above, two L. crocea were only infected with N. girellae, two L. crocea had mixed infections with N. girellae and RSIV. In addition, one L. crocea was mixed infected by N. girellae and P. plecoglossicida, and one L. crocea was mixed infected by N. girellae and V. harveyi (Figure 8).

Figure 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8 Waterfall diagram of N. girellae and its co-infection with the other pathogens in L. crocea. N. girellae means only the N. girellae infection in L. crocea; N. girellae-RSIV means the co-infection of N. girellae and RSIV; N. girellae - P. plecoglossicida means the co-infection of N. girellae and P. plecoglossicida; N. girellae - V. harveyi means the co-infection of N. girellae and V. harveyi.

Moreover, among the three L. crocea with mixed infections of C. irritans and N. girellae, two L. crocea were parasite infections, and one had mixed infections of the two parasites (C. irritans and N. girellae) with S. saprophyticus (Figure 9).

Figure 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9 Waterfall diagram of two parasites (C. irritans and N. girellae) and co-infection with the other pathogens in L. crocea. C. irritans -N. girellae means the co-infection of C. irritans and N. girellae; C. irritans -N. girellae- S. saprophyticus means the co-infection of C. irritans, N. girellae and S. saprophyticus.

3.5 Virus detection statistics

The virus ISKNV, RSIV, and NNV can infect L. crocea. In previous epidemiological surveys of aquaculture diseases, these three viruses were detected in L. crocea. However, only RSIV was detected in this investigation, indicating a higher prevalence of RSIV in Ningbo L. crocea farming area. Among the samples, sixteen fish were carriers of this pathogen, of which 56.25% (9/16) were infected with the virus alone, and 43.75% (7/16) were co-infected with other pathogens. Among them, one fish was infected with P. plecoglossicida, Nocardia seriolae, and Photobacterium damselae, respectively. And one fish was infected with N. girellae and C. irritans parasites, respectively. In addition, there was one L. crocea co-infected with RSIV, V. harveyi and C. irritans (Figure 10, Table 3).

Figure 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10 Virus detection ratio bar chart. RSIV means only the virus infection in L. crocea; RSIV-P. plecoglossicida means the co-infection of RSIV and P. plecoglossicida; RSIV-N. seriolae means the co-infection of RSIV and N. seriolae; RSIV- P. damselae means the co-infection of RSIV and P. damselae; RSIV-N. girellae means the co-infection of RSIV and N. girellae; RSIV-C. irritans means the co-infection of RSIV and C. irritans; RSIV-V. harveyi -C. irritans means the co-infection of RSIV and V. harveyi and C. irritans.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Virus and co-infection with the other pathogens in L. crocea.

3.6 Pathogen detection status in different month

As shown in Table 4, nine types pathogens were isolated. P. plecoglossicida infection was mainly distributed from April to June and October. V. harveyi infections in L. crocea usually occur from June to August and October. Bacteria such as N. seriolae, S. saprophyticus, S. iniae, and P. damselae mainly happen in October. In addition, parasites such as C. irritans and N. girellae are prevalent during May to October and August to October, respectively. In terms of viral pathogens, RSIV are spread in May, July, August, September, and October. Knowing the seasonal time of common pathogen outbreaks is conductive and meaningful in disease prevention and treatment, improving the production of L. crocea.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4 Pathogen species isolated in L. crocea in different month.

4 Discussion

Marine aquaculture is an indispensable part of China’s fisheries and an important part of the national economy. L. crocea is a major aquaculture fish in Fujian, Zhejiang, and Guangdong provinces in China. The booming development of the aquaculture industry of L. crocea has directly or indirectly driven the coastal rural economy and promoted the employment of coastal labor. Nevertheless, there are a series of problems, such as the quality decline and serious aquaculture sea pollution, that lead to low fish farming production and high farming risks. Improving the quality of L. crocea and reducing the risk of breeding, needs to be addressed urgently. Fish disease has become one of the main obstacles to the development of the L. crocea industry.

At present, the diseases in L. crocea aquaculture industry are mainly caused by bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens. The bacteria such as N. seriolae (Wang et al., 2008),V. harveyi (Lin et al., 1999; Ji et al., 2004), V. parahaemolyticus, P. plecoglossicida (Yan et al., 2022), S. iniae and P. damselae (Zhang et al., 2012; Ge et al., 2022), all can infect L. crocea. In this study, bacterial pathogens P. plecoglossicida, V. harveyi, N. seriolae, S. iniae and P. damselae all were identified in L. crocea. In addition, S. saprophyticus was detected in diseased L. crocea, which is also the first report of isolation in diseased L. crocea.

The statistical analysis of bacterial infection demonstrated that P. plecoglossicida and V. harveyi accounted for 52% and 32% of the total strains, respectively, indicating that these two bacteria were the main bacterial species that harmed the culture of L. crocea in Ningbo. In addition, a mixed infection that S. iniae and V. harveyi co-infected L. crocea was verified, indicating the complexity of pathogenic infection. By investigating infection seasons of bacteria, we find P. plecoglossicida mainly happened from April to June and October. Previous research showed the infection occurs during winter and into the next spring, when the water temperature is lower than 20° (Qiu et al., 2012). The infection developed clinical signs of L. crocea at 16–19°C but not at 24–27°C (Mao et al., 2024), which are consistent with this epidemiological investigation. In addition, a variety of bacteria such as S. saprophyticus, S. iniae, and P. damselae were isolated from samples taken in October, which may be related to the sudden change in water temperature and the decline in fish resistance to disease.

Compared with bacterial diseases, some parasitic diseases are more prevalent and more devastating. In marine fish farming, N. girellae (Umeda and Hirazawa, 2004), Amyloosinium ocellatum (He, 2013), C. irritans (Liu et al., 2022; Zhan et al., 2023) were common parasites. The wounds on the body’s surface caused by parasites are easily co-infected by bacteria, leading to severe inflammation, scale shedding, muscle ulcer perforation, excessive mucus secretion, inhibition of breathing, and finally the death of the fish. In this study, C. irritans and N. girellae are two parasites identified and accounted for nearly 30% samples. Investigation showed that C. irritans occurred from May until October, indicating huge harm on L. crocea farming. C. irritans mainly parasitize the gills and body surface of fish, forming a small “white spots”. Due to strong environmental adaptability and high fatality rate, the infection caused by C. irritans has become the most destructive parasitic disease in seedlings and adult fish (Bai et al., 2023).

In the early stage of infection, symptoms such as increased mucus on the body surface and gills, and decreased appetite appear. After that, excessive mucus secretion will wrap the fish body, and fish will swim abnormally and rubbing the pool wall or cage. In the later stage of infection, fish shows difficulty breathing with sluggish behavior, and presents more obvious and thick white spots on the body’s surface, and finally lead to the death. When infected by C. irritans, the wounds caused by rubbing the wall of the pond can be easily secondarily infected by bacteria, which was confirmed by some scholars by isolating the bacteria from the fish body in the fish infected by C. irritans (Liu et al., 2012). In this study, 43% of L. crocea infected with C. irritans were co-infected with P. plecoglossicida or V. harveyi, which also confirmed the susceptibility of parasitic infection to bacterial secondary infection. N.girellae was one important pathogen of L. crocea, which was parasitic on the body surface, fins, and gills, with high mortality near 80% during the epidemic season in July to October (Yang et al., 2001).In this study, N. girellae infection mainly occurs from August to October, which is basically similar to the previous reports. However, pathogenic species analysis found N. girellae and C. irritans co-infected L. crocea. Even, a certain proportion of parasites had mixed infections with Staphylococcus saprophyticus, namely three pathogens co-infection, indicating that some breeding environments were harsh and disease outbreaks were extremely serious.

Iridoviruses (RSIV), the causative agents of serious systemic diseases among cultured, ornamental, and wild fish, have been identified from more than 20 fish species in recent years (Qin et al., 2002). Mortalities of fish caused by systemic RSIV infection reaching 30–100% were observed (Chen et al., 2023a). RSIV had caused high mortality in L. crocea during last few years, and no effective prevention measure was used to control this RSIV disease until now. Development of a rapid and valid method was of great importance for the early diagnosis of RSIV infection and controlment of RSIV disease (Chen et al., 2023b). In this study, the proportion of L. crocea carried RSIV has reached 29%, while infectious ISKNV and NNV were not detected, indicating that the RSIV is more prevalent and harmful to the survival of L. crocea.

At present, there is no effective prevention and control method for viral diseases in L. crocea. Chemical drugs still dominate in bacterial and parasitic diseases. However chemical drugs have limitations that will cause serious drug resistance in pathogenic bacteria. For example, N. seriolae and P. plecoglossicida in the early infection phase hard to detect. Farmers use more antibiotics for preventing these pathogens in advance, which causes drug residue issues, posing serious threats to the safety of aquatic products. In the aspect of parasitic prevention and control, chemicals such as copper sulfate and formaldehyde are currently used. However, the L. crocea breeding environment is mostly an open water system, the entire aquatic ecosystem is seriously polluted and the effect of drug application is very poor. Given the potential problems of chemical drugs in the prevention and treatment of diseases in L. crocea, it is imperative to develop safe and effective prevention and treatment techniques.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The use of experimental animals and the study protocol were reviewed and approved by the Ningbo Ocean and Fisheries Research Institute. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Author contributions

SX: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. MG: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. JF: Writing – original draft. XW: Writing – review & editing. HT: Writing – review & editing. ZL: Writing – review & editing. GT: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the open fund of China (Guangxi)-ASEAN Key Laboratory of Comprehensive Exploitation and Utilization of Aquatic Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Key Laboratory of Aquaculture genetic and breeding and Healthy Aquaculture of Guangxi, Guangxi Academy of Fishery Sciences (No. GXKEYLA-2023-02-2); China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA(CARS-47); and Fund of Key Laboratory of South China Sea Fishery Resources Exploitation & Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, P.R. China (FREU2021-02).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Bai, Y., Liu, Y., Qu, A., Wang, J. Y., Zhao, J., Ke, Q. Z., et al. (2023). Dual RNA-seq reveals a host-pathogen interaction transcriptional regulation pattern between Cryptocaryon irritans and large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Aquaculture 565, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2022.739104

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X. H., Lin, K. B., Wang, X. W. (2003a). Outbreaks of an iridovirus disease in maricultured large yellow croaker, Larimichthys crocea (Richardson), in China. J. Fish Dis. 26, 615–619. doi: 10.1046/j.1365–2761.2003.00494.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, X. H., Wang, X. W., Wu, W. Z. (2003b). Diagnosis of iridovirus in large yellow croaker by PCR. Acta Oceanologica Sin. 22, 635–641. doi: 10.1029/2002JC001507

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fisheries and Fisheries Administration of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Fisheries Technology Extension Center, China Society of Fisheries (2023). China fishery statistical yearbook 2023 (Beijing: China Agriculture Press), 22.

Google Scholar

Ge, M. F., Jin, H., Liu, H., Xu, S. W., Xu, H. C., Wang, W. Q., et al. (2022). Isolation, identification and drug resistance analysis of pathogenic bacteria in pseudosciaena crocea in Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province. China Anim. Health Inspection 39, 57–61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005–944X.2022.06.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, X. K. (2013). Diagnosis and preventive treatment on Amyloodiniosis of Pseudosciaena crocea larvae. J. Fujian Fisheries 35, 457–479. doi: 10.14012/j.cnki.fjsc.2013.06.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji, R. X., Zou, W. Z., Li, Y. H. (2004). Study on pathogen of “skin ulcer” disease of Large Yellow Croaker Pseudosciaena crocea. Mar. Sci. 8, 57–60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000–3096.2004.11.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, K. B., Zhou, C., Liu, J. F., Zhou, S. L., Zeng, Z. N., Chen, M. (1999). Studies on the pathogenic bacteria of Pseudosciaena crocea in marine cage culture. Mar. Sci. 23, 58–62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000–3096.1999.04.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Q. Y., Zhang, H. Y., Miao, L., Fang, W. H., Jin, S., Xie, J. S., et al. (2022). Effect and associated mechanism of copper plates on Cryptocaryon irritans tomonts in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) farming. Aquaculture 552, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2022.737981

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Z. Y., Lin, X. J., Xie, Y. Q., Wu, N. J., Fan, X. J. (2012). Research on death caused by secondary bacterial infection of Cryptocaryon irritans on Pseudosciaena croce. J. Fujian Fisheries 34, 11–15. doi: 10.14012/j.cnki.fjsc.2012.01.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mao, Z. J., Li, S. S., Li, Y. Y., Jia, T. T. (2024). The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas plecoglossicida, its epidemiology, virulence factors, vaccine development, and host-pathogen interactions. J. Aquat. Anim. Health, 1–11. doi: 10.1002/AAH.10215

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, Q. W., Shi, C. Y., Karina, Y. H., Lam, T. J. (2002). Antigenic characterization of a marine fish iridovirus from grouper, Epinephelus spp. J. Virological Methods 106, 89–96. doi: 10.1016/S0166–0934(02)00139–8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiu, Y., Zheng, L., Mao, Z., Chen, X. X. (2012). Isolation the causative agent of visceral white nodule disease of Larimichthys crocea and investigation of the tissue pathology. Microbiol. China. 39, 361–370. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.China.2012.03.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, Y. Z., Zheng, Y., Li, B. G., Yang., X., Guo, Q. Y., Liu, A. Q. (2023). Prevention of quality characteristic decline in freeze-thawed cultured large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) using flammulina velutipes polysaccharide. Food Sci. And Nutr. 11, 181–190. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Umeda, N., Hirazawa, N. (2004). Response of the monogenean neobenedenia girellae to low salinities. Fish Pathol. 39, 105–107. doi: 10.3147/jsfp.39.105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, G. L., Zhu, J. L., Jin, S. (2008). Molecular identification and phylogenetics of pathogenic vibrios in cultured large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea Richardson). Oceanologia limnologia Sin. 39, 162–167. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20080226026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, L., Jin, D., Yang, S. J., Li, X. M., Li, H., Hu, S. B., et al. (2022). Pathogenicity of fish pathogen Pseudomonas plecoglossicida and preparation of its inactivated vaccine. Microbial Pathogenesis 166, 105488. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105488

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, W. C., Li, L. W., Shi, L., Wang, J., Su, Y. Q. (2001). Study on aetiology of Neobenedenia melleni(Monogenea: Capsalidae) from Marine fishes In Fujian, China. J. Oceanograp 20, 205–209. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000–8160.2001.02.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhan, Q. J., Miao, L., Zhao, J., Hu, H. J., Cui, H., Jin, S., et al. (2023). Effect of copper sulphate on Cryptocaryon irritans based on metabolome analysis. J. Fish Dis. 46, 347–356. doi: 10.1111/JFD.13748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, F., SU, Y. Q., Wang, J., Tian, Y.X., Ma, Y., Yan, Q. P. (2012). Studies on the isolation, identification and virulence of photobacterium damselae isolated from pseudosciaena crocea. Oceanologia limnologia Sin. 43, 1202–1208. doi: 10.11693/hyhz201206025025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, S. J., Zhao, Q., Chen, Y. H., Lv, B. Q., Wu, X. F., Liu, H. H, et al. (2016). Expression profile of immune-associated genes in the kidney of cultured large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea in the East China Sea area. J. Ocean Univ. China 15, 731–739. doi: 10.1007/s11802–016-2900–5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Liu, Q., Hu, K., Ge, M. F., Xu, S. W., Huang, C. Y., et al. (2023). Comparative analysis of the effect of nano-copper and Cu2O treatment on Cryptocaryon irritans tomonts in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) farming. Aquaculture 577, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2023.739924

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Larimichthys crocea, disease, co-infection, epidemiology, pathogen

Citation: Xu S, Ge M, Feng J, Wei X, Tan H, Liang Z and Tong G (2024) Epidemiological investigation on diseases of Larimichthys crocea in Ningbo culture area. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14:1420995. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1420995

Received: 21 April 2024; Accepted: 24 May 2024;
Published: 19 June 2024.

Edited by:

Yibin Yang, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (CAFS), China

Reviewed by:

Yanwei Li, South China Agricultural University, China
Haifeng Jiao, Zhejiang Wanli University, China
Caifang Chen, Zhejiang Wanli University, China

Copyright © 2024 Xu, Ge, Feng, Wei, Tan, Liang and Tong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zheng Liang, 247708905@qq.com; Guixiang Tong, tgx15@163.com

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.