Melaku Ashagrie Belete
Selamyhun Tadesse2
Mihret Tilahun
Ermiyas Alemayehu
Muthupandian Saravanan- 1Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
- 2Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia
- 3Department of Pharmacology, AMR and Nanotherapeutics Laboratory, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) has developed various drug resistance mechanisms, which make it difficult to treat with conventional antibiotics. The most common drug resistance mechanisms of S. aureus include: productions of beta-lactamase, an enzyme that breaks down beta-lactam antibiotics such as penicillins and cephalosporins; methicillin resistance [methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)], a genetic mutation that allows them to produce an altered penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a), which has a reduced affinity for methicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics; vancomycin resistance [vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA)], acquired ability to modify their cell wall structure, which reduces the effectiveness of vancomycin; macrolide resistance; aminoglycoside resistance; quinolone resistance, and biofilm formation (Hiramatsu et al., 2014).
Nowadays, recent scientific advances confirmed a novel antibiotic-free means to combat S. aureus antimicrobial resistance. This new therapeutic option is the use of endolysins, enzymes produced by bacteriophages, that can hydrolyze the peptidoglycan layer of bacterial cell walls, leading to bacterial lysis and death. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of endolysins in killing multidrug resistant S. aureus such as MRSA and VRSA in vitro and in vivo, including those that are resistant to conventional antibiotics (Schmelcher et al., 2012; Mishra et al., 2021).
Endolysins are composed of one N-terminal enzymatically active domain (EAD) and one C-terminal cell wall-binding domain (CBD), connected by a short linker region. Endolysins work by binding to the peptidoglycan layer of the bacterial cell wall and cleaving the bond between the N-acetylmuramic acid (NAM) and N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) subunits, unique structures not present in mammalian cells, through specific mechanisms including N-acetylmuraminidase activity to cleave the glycosidic bond between NAM and NAG resembling the action of lysozymes, and endopeptidase activity to cleave the peptide cross-links between amino acid residues in the peptidoglycan layer, resembling the action of endopeptidases (Rahman et al., 2021). Additionally, endolysins exert N-acetylglucosaminidase activity involving hydrolysis of the β-1,4-glycosidic bond between NAG residues in the peptidoglycan layer, transglycosylase activity involving the cleavage of glycosidic bond between sugar residues of peptidoglycan layer facilitating insertion of new peptidoglycan units, lipoteichoic acid hydrolase activity involving hydrolysis of the ester bonds within lipoteichoic acid, and amidase activity involving hydrolysis of the amide bond between NAM and L-alanine residues in the peptidoglycan layer (Schmelcher et al., 2012; Rahman et al., 2021). These enzymatic activities lead to the breakdown of the cell wall and subsequent lysis of the bacterial cell. This means that endolysins are highly specific for their target bacteria and do not affect mammalian host cells, have a low risk of toxicity to human cells, making them a potentially safer alternative to conventional antibiotics (Rahman et al., 2021).
Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of endolysins in killing MRSA both in vitro and in vivo. For instance, a recent study found that a chimeric endolysin composed of lysostaphin and lysostaphin-like domain (LysKLD) was effective against 23 out of 24 clinical MRSA isolates, including those that were resistant to conventional antibiotics (Yang et al., 2019). In a comparable study, Lu Yifei demonstrated a robust antimicrobial activity of a chimeric endolysin LysP108 against S. aureus including MRSA in vitro (Lu et al., 2021). Similar antibacterial activity of a chimeric endolysin Lys109 against MRSA was reported (Son et al., 2021). Another study showed that a combination of endolysin and vancomycin was more effective in treating MRSA and VRSA infections in mouse models than vancomycin alone. In addition, engineered endolysins LysECD7-SMAP and MR10, belonging to the class of enzybiotics, have been shown to have synergistic effects when combined with conventional antibiotics (Chopra et al., 2016; Arshinov et al., 2022). Recent advances further proved the improved efficacy of endolysins LysSP1 and LysPN09, with the presence of EDTA (Jiang et al., 2021; Ni et al., 2021). The incorporation of edible ϵ-poly-L-lysine (EPL), and weak organic acids including citric acid and malic acid were demonstrated to enhance the antibacterial activity of endolysins (Oliveira et al., 2016; Han et al., 2019). A novel endolysin XZ.700 were also found to be effective in treating MRSA biofilms without showing toxicity on human bone cells in vitro (Kuiper et al., 2021). On the other hand, researchers have recently focused on the development of nanotechnology-based delivery vehicles for phage endolysins which allow the delivery of endolysins to infection sites boosting their efficacy (Kashani et al., 2018). Experimental evidence was provided regarding the inhibitory effect of recombinant endolysin XZ.700 against S. aureus skin colonization and malignant T cell activation in the case of cutaneous T cell lymphomas (CTCL) blocking S. aureus induction of Interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and IFNγ-inducible chemokine CXCL10 in mice skin and proliferation of pathogenic S. aureus (Pallesen et al., 2023). An in vivo and in vitro study further revealed the efficacy of an engineered phage endolysin LysRODAmi and ClyRODI-H5 in removing preformed biofilm, preventing new biofilm formation, and killing drug resistant S. aureus in both intact and disrupted keratinocyte monolayers without toxicity toward human keratinocytes (Gutiérrez et al., 2021).
Despite their promise, there are few challenges associated with the use of endolysins as therapeutics, including the potential for development of resistance to endolysins over time probably due to an altered cell wall structures capable of avoiding recognition by endolysins, the difficulty of delivering endolysins to the site of infection as endolysins can be rapidly cleared by the immune system, and too expensive production costs, which could limit their widespread availability. Endolysins are generally promising therapeutic option for the treatment of multidrug resistant S. aureus including MRSA, and other bacterial infections. Their specificity and low risk of toxicity make them potentially safer alternatives to conventional antibiotics. Strategies such as combination therapy with antibiotics or other substances, and nanotechnology-based delivery systems are demonstrated to overcome the limitations associated with their use. However, further research is needed to fully understand their potential as therapeutics and to address the challenges associated with their use.
Author contributions
MB: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. ST: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Investigation, Data curation. MT: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Investigation. EA: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Investigation. MS: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Investigation, Conceptualization.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Arshinov, I. R., Antonova, N. P., Grigoriev, I. V., Pochtovyi, A. A., Tkachuk, A. P., Gushchin, V. A., et al. (2022). Engineered endolysin lysECD7-SMAP reveals antimicrobial synergy with antibiotics and restores sensitivity in gram-negative pathogens. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 58, S65–S74. doi: 10.1134/S0003683822100027
Chopra, S., Harjai, K., Chhibber, S. (2016). Potential of combination therapy of endolysin MR-10 and minocycline in treating MRSA induced systemic and localized burn wound infections in mice. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 306, 707–716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2016.08.003
Gutiérrez, D., Rodríguez-Rubio, L., Ruas-Madiedo, P., Fernández, L., Campelo, A. B., Briers, Y., et al. (2021). Design and selection of engineered lytic proteins with staphylococcus aureus decolonizing activity. Front. Microbiol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.723834
Han, H., Li, X., Zhang, T., Wang, X., Zou, J., Zhang, C., et al. (2019). Bioinformatic analyses of a potential Salmonella-virus-FelixO1 biocontrol phage BPS15S6 and the characterization and anti-Enterobacteriaceae-pathogen activity of its endolysin LyS15S6. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 112, 1577–1592. doi: 10.1007/s10482-019-01283-7
Hiramatsu, K., Katayama, Y., Matsuo, M., Sasaki, T., Morimoto, Y., Sekiguchi, A., et al. (2014). Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and future chemotherapy. J. Infection Chemotherapy. 20, 593–601. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2014.08.001
Jiang, Y., Xu, D., Wang, L., Qu, M., Li, F., Tan, Z., et al. (2021). Characterization of a broad-spectrum endolysin LysSP1 encoded by a Salmonella bacteriophage. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105, 5461–5470. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11366-z
Kashani, H., Schmelcher, M., Sabzalipoor, H., Hosseini, E. S., Moniri, R. (2018). Recombinant Endolysins as Potential Therapeutics against Antibiotic-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current Status of Research and Novel Delivery Strategies. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 31, e00071–e00017. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00071-17
Kuiper, J., Hogervorst, J., Herpers, B. L., Bakker, A. D., Klein-Nulend, J., Nolte, P. A., et al. (2021). The novel endolysin XZ.700 effectively treats MRSA biofilms in two biofilm models without showing toxicity on human bone cells in vitro. Biofouling 37, 184–193. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2021.1887151
Lu, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, Y., Zhong, Q., Li, G., et al. (2021). Phage endolysin lysP108 showed promising antibacterial potential against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.668430
Mishra, A. K., Choi, S. J., Baek, K. H. (2021). Staphylococcus aureus endolysins as potential therapeutics against multidrug resistant staphylococcal infections. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 22, 103–114. doi: 10.2174/1389201021666201021101026
Ni, P., Wang, L., Deng, B., Jiu, S., Ma, C., Zhang, C., et al. (2021). Characterization of a Lytic Bacteriophage against Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and Its Endolysin. Viruses 13, 631. doi: 10.3390/v13040631
Oliveira, H., Vilas Boas, D., Mesnage, S., Kluskens, L. D., Lavigne, R., Sillankorva, S., et al. (2016). Structural and enzymatic characterization of ABgp46, a novel phage endolysin with broad anti-gram-negative bacterial activity. Front. Microbiol. 7, 208. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00208
Pallesen, E. M. H., Gluud, M., Vadivel, C. K., Buus, T. B., de Rooij, B., Zeng, Z., et al. (2023). Endolysin inhibits skin colonization by patient-derived Staphylococcus aureus and Malignant T cell activation in cutaneous T cell lymphoma. J. Invest. Dermatol. 143 (9), 1757–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.01.039
Rahman, Mu, Wang, W., Sun, Q., Shah, J. A., Li, C., Sun, Y., et al. (2021). Endolysin, a promising solution against antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics. 10, 1277. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111277
Schmelcher, M., Donovan, D. M., Loessner, M. J. (2012). Bacteriophage endolysins as novel antimicrobials. Future Microbiol. 7, 1147–1171. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.97
Son, B., Kong, M., Lee, Y., Ryu, S. (2021). Development of a novel chimeric endolysin, lys109 with enhanced lytic activity against staphylococcus aureus. Front. Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.615887
Keywords: phage endolysins, new therapeutic options, multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MDR - S. aureus, combating AMR
Citation: Belete MA, Tadesse S, Tilahun M, Alemayehu E and Saravanan M (2024) Phage endolysins as new therapeutic options for multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging antibiotic-free way to combat drug resistant infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14:1397935. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1397935
Received: 08 March 2024; Accepted: 05 June 2024;
Published: 17 June 2024.
Edited by:
Nadim Cassir, Aix-Marseille Université, FranceReviewed by:
Michal Bukowski, Jagiellonian University, PolandCopyright © 2024 Belete, Tadesse, Tilahun, Alemayehu and Saravanan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Melaku Ashagrie Belete, melakuashagrie@gmail.com; melaku.ashagrie@wu.edu.et