Sanhita Roy1,2*
Peter N. Monk3*- 1Prof. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
- 2Dr. Chigurupati Nageswara Rao Ocular Pharmacology Research Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
- 3Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Editorial on the Research Topic
Combating antimicrobial resistance: peptides and other novel therapeutic interventions to treat ocular, oral and skin infections
Introduction
The discovery of antibiotics and antimicrobials are arguably the most important addition to the powerful arsenal of weapons against human disease. However, the rapid emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) against existing drugs is becoming a global health challenge. World Health Organization predicts almost 10 million deaths per year from AMR by 2050 (Antimicrobial Resistance, 2022), which will cause a huge socio-economic burden. AMR increases patient morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs significantly. AMR results from increased adaptation of the microbes over time towards the existing antimicrobials, which is often achieved by horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (Walsh, 2000). Due to non-judicious use of antimicrobials over the last few decades, there has been evolution and spread of resistant genes among pathogens causing emergence of multi-drug resistant and extremely drug resistant pathogens. The ability to form biofilm is one of the most common mode by which pathogen exhibits AMR and often the mechanisms are complex (Stewart and Costerton, 2001). The AMR in biofilm is typically regulated by different factors. One explanation is the limited penetration of the drug in the biofilm network thus preventing the attainment of effective concentration, also there are increased chances of sequestration of the antibiotic by extracellular matrix environment (Stewart, 1996). The altered environment within the biofilm with different pH and anaerobic niches are also responsible for increased resistance to the biofilms (Urwin et al., 2020). The biofilm specific resistance is also due to existence of ‘persister’ cells that constitutes a small proportion of the total population that evade the bactericidal effects of antibiotics by downregulation of genes involved in metabolic pathways (Fisher et al., 2017). Another major consequence of AMR is that it causes delayed wound healing, mostly due to presence of biofilms that occur in 60-100% of chronic wounds (Anderl et al., 2000).
Potential solutions
In depth research is being carried out to develop new antimicrobial strategies in order to prevent increase in AMR. One such strategy is to use different small molecule virulence inhibitors that prevent infection but do not kill the bacteria directly (Sharma et al., 2020). In a similar way, novel anti-adhesion peptides have been designed that mainly target the adhesion of the bacteria to the host cells, which is usually the first step to initiate infection. One such approach is tetraspanin derived peptides that have shown potential in inhibiting infection both in vitro and in vivo and also accelerated wound healing in murine corneas (Jadi et al., 2023). Along with these, novel therapeutic interventions in form of antimicrobial peptides can be used to prevent AMR. The repurposed drugs which are already approved and have low safety risks are often preferred due to reduced development timelines and cost compared to de novo discovery of new agents can be explored to combat AMR (Farha and Brown, 2019).
In this Research Topic, we put forward a collection of original research articles that studied different antimicrobials in combating infection and biofilm formation using in vitro and in vivo models of infection.
Redesign of existing antimicrobials
The study by Thamilselvan et al. highlights designing of new molecules from the existing repertoire of lead compounds by adding small molecules replacing the boronic acid moiety. They have utilized several interdisciplinary aspects of bioinformatics, medicinal chemistry and microbiology. The several efflux pumps of S. aureus strains including norA play important roles in the emerging resistance against different antibiotics. The authors modelled the 3D structure of NorA and 5-NPPP was selected out of 42 compounds based on the docking score. They checked the combinatorial effect of ciprofloxacin and 5-NPPP against clinical isolate of S. aureus and found that ciprofloxacin showed strong additive effect against 5-NPPP. The compound further decreased NorA mediated efflux in bacteria and was not cytotoxic to mammalian cells even at 100X MIC.
Low toxicity antimicrobial
Somayajulu et al. has studied the effect of pH of glycyrrhizin (GLY) on normal and wounded cornea and conjunctiva using mice model. The authors have earlier shown the effectiveness GLY, a derivative of licorice root, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis using both clinical and laboratory strains. In this article they have demonstrated no alteration in assembly of subbasal nerve fibres or nerve density on application of acidic or neutral GLY compared to PBS. Additionally, no difference in wound closure was observed 24 h post wounding was observed in acidic or neutral GLY treated corneas compared to PBS, however neutral GLY fared over acidic GLY in reducing the bacterial count in mice model of corneal infection.
Adjuvants to improve antimicrobial activity
In the current article Rasha et al. used a zinc oxide nanoparticle (ZnO-NP) to inhibit carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae both in vitro and in vivo. These nano particles were prepared biogenically using Aspergillus niger and were characterized using infrared spectroscopy. These nanoparticles caused damage of bacterial membrane and inhibited the growth of K. pneumoniae. The authors also demonstrated that these particle causes significantly improved wound healing compared to imipenem treated wounds in rats.
Overcoming biofilms
Biofilms are often associated with increased resistance of the pathogens towards antimicrobials and is associated with serious infections. In the presence of vast array of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), often it becomes very challenging and time and resource intensive to identify the potential AMP that act against biofilms. Mhade et al. have manually curated a repository of AMPs focusing on the structural and functional aspect for peptides effective against biofilms. This also includes information on the source, experimental testing and potency of the peptides with feasible in silico evaluation. They also demonstrated a case study against Corynebacterium striatum, a multidrug resistant biofilm forming bacteria. A selected AMP was evaluated by in silico, and in vitro testing. Homology modelling was also performed between the candidate AMP and C. striatum protein.
Conclusion
In conclusion, new strategies need to be implemented to prevent AMR including determination of novel compounds, repurposing of existing drugs, natural product based agents, and combinatorial therapies between peptides and existing antibiotics. Moreover, special care and attention must be implemented regarding the biosafety and biocompatibility while designing new antimicrobials for in vivo applications. In-depth studies must be done to explore alternative therapeutic intervention and efficient drug delivery method to disrupt biofilms and battel antimicrobial resistance.
Author contributions
SR: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the authors and reviewers who participated and contributed in this Research Topic. The authors acknowledge The University of Sheffield, UK and Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, India for infrastructure support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Anderl, J. N., Franklin, M. J., Stewart, P. S. (2000). Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44, 1818–1824. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1818-1824.2000
Antimicrobial Resistance, C. (2022). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 399, 629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
Farha, M. A., Brown, E. D. (2019). Drug repurposing for antimicrobial discovery. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 565–577. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0357-1
Fisher, R. A., Gollan, B., Helaine, S. (2017). Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 453–464. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42
Jadi, P. K., Dave, A., Issa, R., Tabbasum, K., Okurowska, K., Samarth, A., et al. (2023). Tetraspanin CD9-derived peptides inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa corneal infection and aid in wound healing of corneal epithelial cells. Ocul. Surf. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2023.07.001
Sharma, P., Elofsson, M., Roy, S. (2020). Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection by INP0341, a salicylidene acylhydrazide, in a murine model of keratitis. Virulence. 11, 795–804. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1776979
Stewart, P. S. (1996). Theoretical aspects of antibiotic diffusion into microbial biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40, 2517–2522. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.11.2517
Stewart, P. S., Costerton, J. W. (2001). Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 358, 135–138. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1
Urwin, L., Okurowska, K., Crowther, G., Roy, S., Garg, P., Karunakaran, E., et al. (2020). Corneal infection models: tools to investigate the role of biofilms in bacterial keratitis. Cells 9. doi: 10.3390/cells9112450
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial peptides, biofilm, small molecules, antibiotics
Citation: Roy S and Monk PN (2024) Editorial: Combating antimicrobial resistance: peptides and other novel therapeutic interventions to treat ocular, oral and skin infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 14:1388744. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1388744
Received: 20 February 2024; Accepted: 29 February 2024;
Published: 14 March 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Nahed Ismail, University of Illinois Chicago, United StatesCopyright © 2024 Roy and Monk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sanhita Roy, sanhita@lvpei.org; Peter N. Monk, p.monk@sheffield.ac.uk