microRNA, the Innate-Immune System and SARS-CoV-2

The single-stranded viral RNA (ssvRNA) known as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes COVID-19 can be effectively inactivated by a number of natural ribonucleic acid-based host cell defenses. One of the most important of these defenses includes the actions of a class of small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) known as microRNAs (miRNAs). Via base-pair complementarity miRNAs are capable of specifically targeting ssvRNA sequences such as SARS-CoV-2 promoting its inactivation and neutralization. RNA-sequencing and bioinformatics analysis indicate that multiple naturally-occurring human miRNAs have extensive complementarity to the SARS-CoV-2 ssvRNA genome. Since miRNA abundance, speciation, and complexity vary significantly amongst human individuals, this may in part explain the variability in the innate-immune and pathophysiological response of different individuals to SARS-CoV-2 and overall susceptibility to ssvRNA-mediated viral infection.

OVERVIEW – SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS-2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Possessing an unusually large, positive-sense, ssvRNA genome of about ~29,903 nucleotides (nt; SARS-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, Ke et al., 2020; Sah et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Mousavizadeh and Ghasemi, 2021; National Center for Biological Information (NCBI) GenBank Accession No. NC_045512.2; last accessed 16 May 2022), SARS-CoV-2: (i) is a member of the genus Betacoronavirus in the family Coronaviridae that includes other common pathogenic human influenza-causing ssvRNA Coronaviruses (hCoV-OC43, HKU1 and 229E), SARS and MERS-CoV (Sah et al., 2020; Mousavizadeh and Ghasemi, 2021; Raghuvamsi et al., 2021); (ii) consists of a nucleocapsid core containing genomic ssvRNA within a lipoprotein envelope forming a ~100 nm diameter spherical virion particle (Ke et al., 2020); (iii) structurally resembles a ‘typical’ large messenger RNA (mRNA) possessing a 5′ methyl cap structure, a 3′ poly(A) tail and ~10-14 overlapping open reading frames (ORFs) with minimal spacer regions, encoding ~29 proteins, not all of which have been fully characterized (Ke et al., 2020; Sah et al., 2020; Raghuvamsi et al., 2021); (iv) possesses one of the largest ssvRNA genomes of all known ssvRNA viruses and a correspondingly huge target for potential sncRNA and miRNA interaction (Finkel et al., 2021; Mousavizadeh and Ghasemi, 2021; Pogue and Lukiw, 2021; Lukiw, 2022); (v) as an ssvRNA virus is representative of the most common type of emerging viral disease in humans; this appears to be attributable to the high mutation rate in RNA viruses (compared to DNA viruses) that possess extremely high mutation rates of up to 10⁶ times higher than that of their hosts (Pachetti et al., 2020); and (vi) orchestrates a multipronged strategy to impede host protein synthesis including the accelerated degradation of host cytosolic cellular mRNAs, thus facilitating viral takeover of the host mRNA pool in infected cells (Finkel et al., 2021; Lukiw, 2022). The main structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 include the envelope (‘E’), membrane (‘M’), nucleocapsid (‘N’), replicase (‘R’; an RNA dependent RNA polymerase or RdRp), surface spike (‘S’) protein and several accessory viral-encoded proteins (Ke et al., 2020; Finkel et al., 2021; Siniscalchi et al., 2021). The SARS-CoV-2 viral lipoprotein envelope is decorated with ‘E’, ‘M’, and ‘S’ proteins - the ‘S’ protein is a class 1 homo-trimeric viral fusion protein possessing distinctive ‘head’ and ‘stalk’ domains essential for host cell entry via the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor (see below; Ke et al., 2020; Raghuvamsi et al., 2021; Lukiw, 2021). As discussed further below, using various miRNA-mRNA and miRNA-ssvRNA search algorithms, ‘in silico’ analysis and experimental validation, multiple naturally occurring human host miRNAs have been both predicted and verified to target several of these key SARS-CoV-2 genomic protein-encoding regions (Arisan et al., 2020; Finkel et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021). This Perspectives paper will address some of the most current findings and emerging concepts in this fascinating research area of potential miRNA contribution to human innate-immunity with special reference to natural host miRNAs, SARS-CoV-2, and the current COVID-19 pandemic.

miRNA, Mechanism of Action and the Innate-Immune System

The discovery of the first microRNA (miRNA) Lin-4 in 1993 in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and its post-transcriptional targeting and down-regulation of the target mRNA encoded by the heterochronic developmental gene Lin-14 revolutionized the entire field of molecular biology (Lee et al., 1993; Wightman et al., 1993; Bartel, 2018). It was not until almost a decade later that multiple miRNAs were first identified and characterized in Homo sapien cells and tissues (Lagos-Quintana et al., 2001; Hammond, 2015). About 15 years ago appeared the first reports on the interplay between host-derived miRNAs, inflammation and innate-immunity during health, viral infection, neurological disease and cancer (Calin and Croce, 2006; Lukiw, 2007; Bhela and Rouse, 2018; O'Brien et al., 2018; Mishra et al., 2020; Finkel et al., 2021; Padda et al., 2021). It has been established that the major mechanism of miRNA action is to bind via base-pair complementarity to single-stranded target mRNA, and in doing so, down-regulate or neutralize their biological activities (Hammond, 2015; Bartel, 2018; Lukiw, 2021). Taken together these studies uncovered complex, highly interactive and selective miRNA-viral and host-cell interactions. These included interplay among the pro-inflammatory- and innate-immune microRNA-146a (miRNA-146a), the neurotropic double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) herpes-simplex virus 1 and human neurons (HSV-1; Hill et al., 2009; Pogue and Lukiw, 2021). Largely based upon these original studies on direct miRNA-target mRNA interaction there is currently an expanding interest linking direct host miRNA interaction with ssvRNA species such as SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent viral inactivation, degradation and down-regulation of viral activity and capability for successful infection in the human host (Plotnikova et al., 2019; Mishra et al., 2020; Pierce et al., 2020; Wicik et al., 2020; Lukiw, 2021; Mousavizadeh and Ghasemi, 2021; Narożna and Rubiś, 2021; Okuyan and Begen, 2021). Current research further supports the concept that the actions of the 2,650 known ~20-24 nucleotide (nt) human miRNAs and other small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) and/or interfering RNAs (iRNAs) form the functional basis for a novel division of the host innate-immune system and its management of viral genomic activity that has implications for the efficiency of ssvRNA invasion and potential for infection.

The Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Receptor

The ACE2 receptor is a zinc-containing carboxypeptidase membrane-integral cell-surface receptor widely expressed in multiple cell types that is uniquely recognized by the SARS-CoV-2 virus ‘S’ glycoprotein for initial human host cell entry (Ke et al., 2020; Pierce et al., 2020; Hill et al., 2021; Lukiw, 2021; Raghuvamsi et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021). As the major SARS-CoV-2 cell surface-exposed transmembrane glycoprotein receptor ACE2 displays a significant variability in abundance on multiple human cell types and this may not only add another degree of variability for SARS-CoV-2 cellular invasion but also modulates SARS-CoV-2 exposure to the variable miRNA abundance and speciation in different human cell types (Ke et al., 2020; Hill et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021). In fact, the ACE2 receptor, the gateway for SARS-CoV-2 entry into the host cell, has a remarkable ubiquity, and has been detected on the surface of every human cell type so far analyzed with the exception of the erythrocyte, thus making it among the most prevalent receptor subtype encountered in all of human physiology (Hill et al., 2021; Jones et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021). Interestingly, the ACE2 receptor mRNA is itself targeted by multiple natural host miRNAs and this may also have a bearing on the availability of ACE2 receptor abundance on multiple cell and tissue types in different human hosts – an observation that may be useful in the personalized diagnosis of COVID-19 (Wicik et al., 2020). Together these findings support the concept: (i) that multiple cell types and tissues of the human respiratory, circulatory, cardiovascular, digestive and genitourinary system, hematic, lymphatic and glymphatic systems, and the central and peripheral nervous systems (CNS, PNS) provide multiple potential entry portals for SARS-CoV-2 invasion; and (ii) that the invasion of SARS-CoV-2 into multiple human cell types would also expose this ssvRNA to multiple cell-enriched or cell-specific species of miRNA. This may explain in part the wide and variable range of systemic involvement of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the wide spectrum of symptoms observed in COVID-19 patients. Indeed, while SARS-CoV-2 initially causes severe and acute respiratory distress and a highly lethal viral pneumonia it also presents with multiple ancillary complications involving multiple cell and tissue systems. An important example of focused SARS-CoV-2 attack is that within the normal human brain and CNS, extremely high levels of ACE2 receptor expression and abundance are found within the Botzinger complex of the rostral ventrolateral medulla, ventral respiratory column and other medullary respiratory centers of the brainstem, and this in part may explain the susceptibility of numerous COVID-19 patients to serious disturbances in quiet, restful breathing (eupnea) and the onset of severe respiratory complications (Hill et al., 2021; Mousavizadeh and Ghasemi, 2021; Lukiw, 2021; Raghuvamsi et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021). An increasing gradient of ACE2 receptor density in the human visual system may aid in the translocation of SARS-CoV-2 from the moist surface of the exterior of the eye into deeper regions of the visual brain (Lukiw, 2022). Another noteworthy example is that about one third of all COVID-19 patients experience neurological and/or neuropsychiatric symptoms, and a pre-existing diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) predicts the highest risk for COVID-19 yet identified, especially among elderly AD patients. ACE2 expression and the density of ACE2 receptors have recently been found to be significantly up-regulated in the temporal lobe neocortex and hippocampal CA1 regions of AD-affected brain, anatomical regions targeted by the inflammatory neuropathology that characterizes AD, and this suggests a significant mechanistic overlap between AD and successful SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections of the human CNS (Hill et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2021; Choe et al., 2022; Lingor et al., 2022; Sirin et al., 2022; Szabo et al, 2022; Wang et al., 2022).

Human microRNA and SARS-CoV-2 – Complexity by the Numbers

In Homo sapiens miRNAs possess very highly selected and ‘evolutionary engineered’ ribonucleotide sequences and currently represent the smallest known information-carrying sncRNA sequences yet described. With regard to evolutionary selection, a fascinating and often overlooked fact is that a ~22 nucleotide miRNA with the possibility of 4 ribonucleotides (A,G,C or U) at each of the 22 positions could yield the staggering possibility of 4²² (an exponentiation of four by the power of twenty-two) or about ~1.76x10¹³ potential sncRNA sequences, however only about ~2.65 x10³ miRNA sequences have been detected in all of human biology (miRBase ver 22.1, https://www.mirbase.org/; GENCODE data ver 38, https://www. gencodegenes.org/human/; last accessed 30 April 2022). This represents an extraordinary evolutionary selection pressure of just one ‘biologically useful’ miRNA out of every 6.8x10⁹ prospective possible miRNA sequences that had potential to be generated. These ~2.65 x10³ highly selected miRNAs that are present and function in human biology are currently believed to collectively regulate one third all of the genes in the human genome and are involved in the post-transcriptional control of gene expression patterns, the dynamic regulation of the cell’s transcriptome, neurodevelopment, aging and disease, including many human systemic disorders ranging from multiple types of cancer to Alzheimer’s disease (AD), other forms of age-related neurodegenerative disease and the modulation of the invasion of the host by pathogenic microbes (Lukiw, 2007; O'Brien et al., 2018; Plotnikova et al., 2019; Chakraborty et al., 2020; Fregeac et al., 2020; Padda et al., 2021; Pogue and Lukiw, 2021; Rybak-Wolf and Plass (2021).

Regarding this latter function, recent evidence further indicates that miRNAs play an important role in the complex interplay between viruses (containing both DNA and RNA genomes) and host cell genetics (Hill et al., 2009; Mishra et al., 2020; Wicik et al., 2020; Narożna and Rubiś, 2021; Schultz et al., 2021; Siniscalchi et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021). An interesting relevant example is that the NF-kB-sensitive Homo sapiens microRNA-146a (hsa-miRNA-146a-5p) is significantly over-expressed within brain and CNS tissues of progressive and often lethal viral-mediated neurological syndromes associated with age and advancing inflammatory neurodegeneration, and these include ~18 different viral-induced encephalopathies involving both single- and double-stranded RNA and/or DNA viruses (Pogue and Lukiw, 2021; Kucher et al., 2022). Despite huge research efforts, whether this represents part of the host’s adaptive immunity, innate-immune response or a mechanism to enable the invading virus a successful infection is currently not well understood (Jones et al., 2021; Narożna and Rubiz 2021; Pogue and Lukiw, 2021). Another specific and rather enigmatic example is that recent in silico analyses have determined that about ~600 of these host miRNAs, representing about one quarter of the total number of currently identified miRNAs in human cells have potential to interact with the SARS-CoV-2 genome (Siniscalchi et al., 2021; Ying et al., 2021; unpublished observations; see below). The RNA dynamics, sequence selectivity and complexity of this large family of potentially ‘anti-viral host miRNAs’ is certainly perplexing because their existence has long preceded the appearance and invasion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus into human populations. One explanation may be that conserved areas of the SARS-CoV-2 genome such as the ORF that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 viral replicase (RdRp) complex, consisting of a set of proteins required to produce infectious genomes, retain very highly conserved features in eukaryotic replicase-type enzymes and the RNA sequences that encode them over considerable periods of evolution (https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/rna-viruses; last accessed 30 April 2022; Hillen et al., 2020; Pachetti et al., 2020).

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 miRNA’s

It is well established that the major functions of host miRNAs include: (i) mRNA silencing involving miRNA-mediated repression of the expression of genetic information encoded in the target mRNA; (ii) the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression patterns that extends into the shaping of the transcriptome of the cell during development and in health, aging and disease; and (iii) in playing a potential host-protective role in neutralizing microbial and ssvRNA invasion, including those by Coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2, thus contributing to a novel miRNA-facilitated innate-immune system for that host (Hammond, 2015; Trobaugh and Klimstra, 2017; Bartel, 2018; Plotnikova et al., 2019; Pierce et al., 2020; Wicik et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2021; Lukiw, 2021; Pogue and Lukiw, 2021; Siniscalchi et al., 2021). The two most important parameters for miRNAs to find their target ssRNAs, ssvRNAs or mRNAs are: (i) base-pair complementarity between the ssRNA, the ssvRNA or the mRNA ‘seed region’; and (ii) the thermodynamic stability of the miRNA-target RNA hybrid (ΔG or free energy of association E_A) with values of E_A of less than −20 kCal/mol between the miRNA and its ssRNA target being most highly favored (Lagos-Quintana et al., 2001; Bartel, 2018; Pierce et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2021; Lukiw, 2021; Siniscalchi et al., 2021). In general, depending on the stringency of RNA hybridization parameters and most favorable energies of association (E_A), over the last ~2 years multiple possible binding sites have been predicted for miRNA binding to SARS-CoV-2 ssvRNA targets and multiple recent examples are next given here.

The Uysal-Onganer group first predicted seven miRNAs including miRNA-1307-3p, miRNA-1468-5p, miRNA-3611, miRNA-3691-3p, miRNA-3934-3p, miRNA-5197 and miRNA-8066 could strongly bind to the SARS-CoV-2 genome and linked these to host responses and virus pathogenicity-related KEGG pathways significant for comorbidities (Arisan et al., 2020). In a similar in silico study the McLellan group described 10 miRNAs expressed in SARS-CoV-2 target cells filtered according to databases and published data, and reported miRNA-18b-5p, miRNA-197-5p, miRNA-338-3p, miRNA-1273d, miRNA-3154, miRNA-3935-5p, miRNA-4436a, miRNA-4661-3p, miRNA-4761-5p and miRNA-5096 strongly targeted the ORF1a, ORF1b, ORF7a and ‘S’ regions of the SARS-CoV-2 genome (Hosseini Rad Sm and McLellan, 2020). Another recent in silico study using miRBase, MiRanda and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) software provided evidence: (i) that the miRNA-29 family had the most binding sites (N=11) on the SARS-CoV-2 ssRNA genome; and (ii) that the top human host miRNA candidates targeting the SARS-CoV-2 ssvRNA genome include those of the miRNA-16, miRNA-21, miRNA-29a/b, let-7b, let-7e, miRNA-122 and miRNA-146a microRNA families and others (Jafarinejad-Farsangi et al., 2020). These in silico prediction studies often display variable end results due to the settings for miRNA-target RNA base-pair complementarity algorithms and the thermodynamic stability of the miRNA-ssRNA hybrid itself. In silico studies have most recently been integrated with experimental target validation to ascertain bona fide SARS-CoV-2 targeting and ssvRNA neutralization. For example, in one recent study RNAhybrid 2.2 and MirTarget analytical programs predicted between 857 and 2654 miRNA-SARS-CoV-2 pairings, respectively. About ~600 target sequences common to both analytical programs were subsequently filtered to select miRNAs expressed in respiratory cells of the lung (one natural site of SARS-CoV-2 infection) that revealed a perfect match to the seed region (nucleotides 2–8) of the hybridizing miRNA (Pierce et al., 2020; Siniscalchi et al., 2021). Experimental target validation using psiCheck-2 luciferase reporter plasmids transfected into the human lung cell line A549 indicated that several SARS-CoV-2 ssvRNA targets were experimentally validated including; importantly, a Homo sapien 22 nt, lung-enriched hsa-miRNA-15b-5p that targets and represses ‘S’ protein expression (Trobaugh and Klimstra, 2017; Siniscalchi et al., 2021; https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene =MIR15B; https://www.mirbase.org/cgi-bin/mirna_entry.pl?acc=MI0000438; last accessed 30 April 2022; see below; Table 1. Taken together these data suggest that the identified miRNAs should interact with ssvRNAs within infected cells, thus contributing to the regulation of SARS-CoV-2 gene expression, viability and capability for host-cell invasion.

TABLE 1

Table 1 miRNAs predicted to interact with the ssvRNA of SARS-CoV-2.

It should also be mentioned: (i) that both the ACE2 receptor and accessory ACE2-associated viral entry proteins such as the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) and other cellular membrane ACE2-associated proteins may also have their encoding mRNAs targeted by specific sncRNAs and/or miRNAs which may further modulate the success of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity (Pierce et al., 2020; Wicik et al., 2020); and (ii) that the actions of host miRNAs on ssvRNAs are variable and depend on multiple endogenous and exogenous factors. While some host miRNAs may reinforce host antiviral responses against viruses by neutralizing ssvRNA sequences, some may also promote viral RNA stability, replication, and support successful infectivity (Trobaugh and Klimstra, 2017; Wicik et al., 2020). Another interesting consideration is that human population differences in individual miRNA abundance, speciation and complexity have been shown in different human and animal populations and in different cell- and tissue-types (Huang et al., 2011; He et al., 2017; Pogue and Lukiw, 2021). Different endogenous miRNA populations of human cells and tissues and the heterogeneous repertoire of different miRNAs in individual humans may in part explain: (i) the widely observed differential variability and human sensitivity and susceptibility to ssRNA viral infection such as SARS-CoV-2; (ii) the endogenous innate-immune capability to neutralize these and other invading microbial species; and (iii) the basis for a potential strategy in using stabilized miRNAs for the neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 and the therapeutic management of COVID-19 and other life-threatening microbial-mediated diseases (Lukiw, 2021; Padda et al., 2021; Ying et al., 2021).

Conclusion

Emerging evidence continues to support the concept that as a novel form of immune surveillance, human miRNAs, sncRNAs and small iRNAs have a significant potential to shape the host’s innate-immune response to infection by invading ssvRNA viruses that include SARS-CoV-2. This ‘Perspectives’ paper proposes that the actions of the ~2,650 known human miRNAs constitute, in part, the basis for an under-recognized and under-appreciated innate-immune regulatory system for modulating ssvRNA viral genome activities that also has implications for the efficiency of SARS-CoV2 invasion, infectivity and viral replication. As miRNA abundance, speciation, and complexity varies significantly among human individuals, this may: (i) explain in part the variability in the innate-immune immunological and pathophysiological response of different human individuals to the initiation and progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection; and (ii) further support our understanding of the variable susceptibility and resistance of individuals to ssvRNA-mediated viral infection and COVID-19 and perhaps to other ssvRNA and related viral-mediated pandemics that may arise in the future on a global scale.

Lastly, evolving evidence continues to suggest that pathological ssvRNA genomes like SARS-CoV-2 are susceptible to attack, destruction, neutralization, and/or modulation by multiple naturally-occurring host miRNAs. While the basic mechanisms of miRNA-ssvRNA natural hybrid formation and selection are becoming increasingly understood, the specific interaction of human host miRNA with ssvRNAs like SARS-CoV-2 in human physiology remains extremely complicated and perplexing. Cellular, transcriptional, genetic, epigenetic, immunological, metabolic, developmental, environmental and other epidemiological conditions affect the generation and processing of host miRNAs leading to dynamic, temporal and cell- and tissue-specific patterns of miRNA abundance, speciation and complexity (O'Brien et al., 2018; Pogue and Lukiw, 2021; Wicik et al., 2020; Ying et al., 2021). There are also aging-, gender- and disease-associated effects on miRNA expression patterns in human biology. For example, some ‘beneficial’ human anti-viral miRNAs naturally down-regulated with aging may display modified SARS-CoV-2‐host cell interactions that enhance the severity and mortality among elderly COVID-19 patients, particularly those greater than 65 years of age (Fulzele et al., 2020; Choe et al., 2022; Kucher et al., 2022; Lingor et al., 2022). When compared to normal cells and tissues, diseases such as cancer and AD display different intrinsic patterns of host miRNA expression throughout these disease processes. Inter-current SARS-CoV-2 infection with these and other life-threatening/incapacitating diseases usually predict an unfavorable clinical outcome. One of the initial miRNA-based pharmaceuticals which specifically targets and down-regulates ssvRNA levels (Miravirsen; Santaris Pharma A/S/Hoffmann-La Roche-Genentech, San Francisco USA) is currently in Phase III clinical trials and there is emerging and supportive evidence that stabilized miRNAs have strong potential to down-regulate and/or neutralize viral replication, modulate the progress of viral infection and/or enhance survival rates especially in the more advanced and severely-affected COVID-19 patients (Chakraborty et al., 2020; Narożna and Rubiś, 2021; Okuyan and Begen, 2021; Schultz et al., 2021; Choe et al., 2022; Kucher et al., 2022).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

WL and JH conceptualized this perspective article and all authors contributed to the writing, reading and approval of the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by an unrestricted grant from the LSU Eye Center Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), the Brown Foundation, Joe and Dorothy Dorsett Innovation in Science Healthy Aging Award, the Louisiana Biotechnology Research Network (LBRN) and National Institute of Health (NIH) grants NEI EY006311, NIA AG18031 and NIA AG038834 (WL).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

This Perspectives paper is dedicated to the memory of the late JH, of the Neuroscience Center and the Departments of Ophthalmology, Pharmacology, and Microbiology at the Louisiana State University Health Science Center (LSU-HSC), New Orleans LA, 70112−2272, USA. JH had a life-long interest in ACE2 expression throughout the CNS in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and the potential role of viral infection of herpes simplex 1 (HSV-1) and other human viruses as a potential contributor to the initiation and propagation of AD and related neurodegenerative diseases with an inflammatory and innate-immune component. Research on human brain, retina and CNS, host cell transcriptomics and RNA quantity, speciation and complexity in the Lukiw laboratory involving total human RNA, microRNA (miRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA) sequencing and array-based quantitation, the innate-immune response in AD, brain viral infection and prion disease and other forms of neurological or retinal degenerative disease, amyloidogenesis and neuroinflammation was supported through an unrestricted grant from the LSU Eye Center Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB), the Louisiana Biotechnology Research Network (LBRN) and National Institute of Health (NIH) grants NEI EY006311, NIA AG18031 and NIA AG038834 (WL).

Abbreviations

COVID-19, coronavirus disease of the year 2019; has, Homo sapien; KEGG, Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes; mRNA, messenger RNA (mRNA); miRNA, microRNA; RdRp, RNA dependent RNA polymerase; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2; single-stranded viral RNA, (ssvRNA); WHO, World Health Organization.

References

Arisan, E. D., Dart, A., Grant, G. H., Arisan, S., Cuhadaroglu, S., Lange, S., et al. (2020). The Prediction of miRNAs in SARS-CoV-2 Genomes: hsa-miRNA Databases Identify 7 Key miRNAs Linked to Host Responses and Virus Pathogenicity-Related KEGG Pathways Significant for Comorbidities. Viruses. 12, 614. doi: 10.3390/v12060614

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bartel, D. P. (2018). Metazoan microRNAs. Cell. 173, 20–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhela, S., Rouse, B. T. (2018). Are miRNAs Critical Determinants in Herpes Simplex Virus Pathogenesis? Microbes Infect. 20, 461–465. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2017.12.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calin, G. A., Croce, C. M. (2006). MicroRNA-Cancer Connection: The Beginning of a New Tale. Cancer Res. 66, 7390–7394. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0800

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chakraborty, C., Sharma, A. R., Sharma, G., Lee, S. S. (2020). Therapeutic Advances of miRNAs: A Preclinical and Clinical Update. J. Adv. Res. 28, 127–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choe, K., Park, H. Y., Ikram, M., Lee, H. J., Park, T. J., Ullah, R., et al. (2022). Systematic Review of the Common Pathophysiological Mechanisms in COVID-19 and Neurodegeneration: The Role of Bioactive Compounds and Natural Antioxidants. Cells. 11, 1298. doi: 10.3390/cells11081298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Finkel, Y., Mizrahi, O., Nachshon, A., Weingarten-Gabbay, S., Morgenstern, D., Yahalom-Ronen, Y., et al. (2021). The Coding Capacity of SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 589, 125–130. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2739-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fregeac, J., Moriceau, S., Poli, A., Nguyen, L. S., Oury, F., Colleaux, L. (2020). Loss of the Neurodevelopmental Disease-Associated Gene miRNA-146a Impairs Neural Progenitor Differentiation and Causes Learning and Memory Deficits. Mol. Autism. 11, 22. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00328-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fulzele, S., Sahay, B., Yusufu, I., Lee, T. J., Sharma, A., Kolhe, R., et al. (2020). COVID-19 Virulence in Aged Patients Might Be Impacted by the Host Cellular microRNAs Abundance/Profile. Aging Dis. 11, 509–522. doi: 10.14336/AD.2020.0428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hammond, S. M. (2015). An Overview of microRNAs. Adv. Drug Deliv Rev. 87, 3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.05.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, D., Zou, T., Gai, X., Ma, J., Li, M., Huang, Z., et al. (2017). MicroRNA Expression Profiles Differ Between Primary Myofiber of Lean and Obese Pig Breeds. PloS One 12, e0181897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181897

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hill, J. M., Clement, C., Arceneaux, L., Lukiw, W. J. (2021). Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Expression in the Aged Brain and Visual System. J. Aging Sci. 9 (Suppl 7), 001.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Hillen, H. S., Kokic, G., Farnung, L., Dienemann, C., Tegunov, D., Cramer, P. (2020). Structure of Replicating SARS-CoV-2 Polymerase. Nature. 584, 154–156. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2368-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hill, J. M., Zhao, Y., Clement, C., Neumann, D. M., Lukiw, W. J. (2009). HSV-1 Infection of Human Brain Cells Induces miRNA-146a and Alzheimer-Type Inflammatory Signaling. Neuroreport. 20, 1500–1505. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283329c05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hosseini Rad Sm, A., McLellan, A. D. (2020). Implications of SARS-CoV-2 Mutations for Genomic RNA Structure and Host microRNA Targeting. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 4807. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134807

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, R. S., Gamazon, E. R., Ziliak, D., Wen, Y., Im, H. K., Zhang, W., et al. (2011). Population Differences in microRNA Expression and Biological Implications. RNA Biol. 8, 692–701. doi: 10.4161/rna.8.4.16029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jafarinejad-Farsangi, S., Jazi, M. M., Rostamzadeh, F., Hadizadeh, M. (2020). High Affinity of Host Human microRNAs to SARS-CoV-2 Genome: An in Silico Analysis. Noncoding. RNA Res. 5, 222–231. doi: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2020.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, J. E., Le Sage, V., Lakdawala, S. S. (2021). Viral and Host Heterogeneity and Their Effects on the Viral Life Cycle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 272–282. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00449-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ke, Z., Oton, J., Qu, K., Cortese, M., Zila, V., McKeane, L., et al. (2020). Structures and Distributions of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Proteins on Intact Virions. Nature 588, 498–502. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2665-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kucher, A. N., Koroleva, I. A., Zarubin, A. A., Nazarenko, M. S. (2022). MicroRNAs as the Potential Regulators of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Modifiers of the COVID-19 Clinical Features. Mol. Biol. 56, 29–45. doi: 10.1134/S0026893322010034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lagos-Quintana, M., Rauhut, R., Lendeckel, W., Tuschl, T. (2001). Identification of Novel Genes Coding for Small Expressed RNAs. Science 294, 853–858. doi: 10.1126/science.1064921

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L., Ambros, V. (1993). The C. Elegans Heterochronic Gene Lin-4 Encodes Small RNAs With Antisense Complementarity to Lin-14. Cell 75, 843–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-Y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lingor, P., Demleitner, A. F., Wolff, A. W., Feneberg, E. (2022). SARS-CoV-2 and Neurodegenerative Diseases: What We Know and What We Don't. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 17:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00702-022-02500-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lukiw, W. J. (2007). Micro-RNA Speciation in Fetal, Adult and Alzheimer's Disease Hippocampus. Neuroreport. 18, 297–300. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280148e8b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lukiw, W. J. (2021). microRNA Heterogeneity, Innate-Immune Defense and the Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Noncoding. RNA. 7, 37. doi: 10.3390/ncrna7020037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lukiw, W. J. (2022). David Hunter Hubel, the 'Circe Effect', and SARS-CoV-2 Infection of the Human Visual System. Front. Biosci. (Landmark. Ed). 27, 7. doi: 10.31083/j.fbl2701007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, R., Kumar, A., Ingle, H., Kumar, H. (2020). The Interplay Between Viral-Derived miRNAs and Host Immunity During Infection. Front. Immunol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mousavizadeh, L., Ghasemi, S. (2021). Genotype and Phenotype of COVID-19: Their Roles in Pathogenesis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 54, 159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.03.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Narożna, M., Rubiś, B. (2021). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Strategies and the Potential Role of miRNA in the Assessment of COVID-19 Morbidity, Recurrence, and Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 8663. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168663

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

National Center for Biological Information (NCBI) GenBank (2021) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, Complete Genome 29903 Nt Linear RNA NC_045512.2 GI:1798174254. 2021. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1798174254 (Accessed 30 April 2022).

Google Scholar

O'Brien, J., Hayder, H., Zayed, Y., Peng, C. (2018). Overview of microRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 9. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Okuyan, H. M., Begen, M. A. (2021). miRNAs as Attractive Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets for Familial Mediterranean Fever. Modern Rheumatol. 32, 1–25. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1868674

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pachetti, M., Marini, B., Benedetti, F., Giudici, F., Mauro, E., Storici, P., et al. (2020). Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Mutation Hot Spots Include a Novel RNA-Dependent-RNA Polymerase Variant. J. Transl. Med. 18, 179. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02344-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Padda, J., Khalid, K., Khedr, A., Patel, V., Al-Ewaidat, O. A., Tasnim, F., et al. (2021). Exosome-Derived microRNA: Efficacy in Cancer. Cureus. 13, e17441. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pierce, J. B., Simion, V., Icli, B., Pérez-Cremades, D., Cheng, H. S., Feinberg, M. W. (2020). Computational Analysis of Targeting SARS-CoV-2, Viral Entry Proteins ACE2 and TMPRSS2, and Interferon Genes by Host microRNAs. Genes (Basel). 11, 1354. doi: 10.3390/genes11111354

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Plotnikova, O., Baranova, A., Skoblov, M. (2019). Comprehensive Analysis of Human microRNA-mRNA Interactome. Front. Genet. 10. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pogue, A. I., Lukiw, W. J. (2021). microRNA-146a-5p, Neurotropic Viral Infection and Prion Disease (PrD). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 9198. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raghuvamsi, P. V., Tulsian, N. K., Samsudin, F., Qian, X., Purushotorman, K., Yue, G., et al. (2021). SARS-CoV-2 S Protein: ACE2 Interaction Reveals Novel Allosteric Targets. Elife. 10, e63646. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63646

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rybak-Wolf, A., Plass, M. (2021). RNA Dynamics in Alzheimer's Disease. Mol. (Basel. Switzerland). 26 (17), 5113. doi: 10.3390/molecules26175113

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sah, R., Rodriguez-Morales, A. J., Jha, R., Chu, D. K. W., Gu, H., Peiris, M., et al. (2020). Complete Genome Sequence of a 2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Strain Isolated in Nepal. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 9, e169–e220. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00169-20

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schultz, I. C., Bertoni, A. P. S., Wink, M. R. (2021). Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Carrying miRNA as a Potential Multi Target Therapy to COVID-19: An In Silico Analysis. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 17, 341–356. doi: 10.1007/s12015-021-10122-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Siniscalchi, C., Di Palo, A., Russo, A., Potenza, N. (2021). Human microRNAs Interacting With SARS-CoV-2 RNA Sequences: Computational Analysis and Experimental Target Validation. Front. Genet. 12. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.678994

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sirin, S., Nigdelioglu Dolanbay, S., Aslim, B. (2022). The Relationship of Early- and Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Genes With COVID-19. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna). 16:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00702-022-02499-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Szabo, M. P., Iba, M., Nath, A., Masliah, E., Kim, C. (2022). Does SARS-CoV-2 Affect Neurodegenerative Disorders? TLR2, a Potential Receptor for SARS-CoV-2 in the CNS. Exp. Mol. Med. 54(4):447–454. doi: 10.1038/s12276-022-0755

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trobaugh, D. W., Klimstra, W. B. (2017). MicroRNA Regulation of RNA Virus Replication and Pathogenesis. Trends Mol. Med. 23, 80–93. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Li, M., Kazis, L. E., Xia, W. (2022). Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19 Infection Among Patients With Alzheimer's Disease or Mild Cognitive Impairment. Alzheimers Dement 18:911–919. doi: 10.1002/alz.12665

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wicik, Z., Eyileten, C., Jakubik, D., Simões, S. N., Martins, D. C., Pavão, R., et al. (2020). ACE2 Interaction Networks in COVID-19: A Physiological Framework for Prediction of Outcome in Patients With Cardiovascular Risk Factors. J. Clin. Med. 9 (11), 3743. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113743

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wightman, B., Ha, I., Ruvkun, G. (1993). Posttranscriptional Regulation of the Heterochronic Gene Lin-14 by Lin-4 Mediates Temporal Pattern Formation in C. Elegans. Cell 75, 855–862. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90530-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, F., Zhao, S., Yu, B., Chen, Y. M., Wang, W., Song, Z. G., et al. (2020). A New Coronavirus Associated With Human Respiratory Disease in China. Nature 579, 265–269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ying, H., Ebrahimi, M., Keivan, M., Khoshnam, S. E., Salahi, S., Farzaneh, M. (2021). miRNAs; A Novel Strategy for the Treatment of COVID-19. Cell Biol. Int. 45, 2045–2053. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11653

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Li, W., Lukiw, W. J. (2021). Ubiquity of the SARS-CoV-2 Receptor ACE2 and Upregulation in Limbic Regions of Alzheimer's Disease Brain. Folia Neuropathol. 59, 232–238. doi: 10.5114/fn.2021.109495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar