AUTHOR=Roisin Lolita , Melloul Elise , Woerther Paul-Louis , Royer Guilhem , Decousser Jean-Winoc , Guillot Jacques , Dannaoui Eric , Botterel Françoise 

TITLE=Modulated Response of Aspergillus fumigatus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to Antimicrobial Agents in Polymicrobial Biofilm

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2020

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2020.574028

DOI=10.3389/fcimb.2020.574028

ISSN=2235-2988

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Introduction:</bold> The complexity of biofilms constitutes a therapeutic challenge and the antimicrobial susceptibility of fungal-bacterial biofilms remains poorly studied. The filamentous fungus <italic>Aspergillus fumigatus</italic> (Af) and the Gram-negative bacillus <italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</italic> (Sm) can form biofilms and can be co-isolated from the airways of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We previously developed an <italic>in vitro</italic> biofilm model which highlighted the antibiosis effect of Sm on Af, which was dependent on the bacterial fitness. The aim of the present study was to investigate the <italic>in vitro</italic> susceptibility of Af and Sm in mono- or polymicrobial biofilms to five antimicrobial agents alone and in two-drug combinations.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> Af and Sm clinical reference strains and two strains from CF sputa were tested through a planktonic and biofilm approaches. Af, Sm, or Af-Sm susceptibilities to amphotericin B (AMB), itraconazole (ITC), voriconazole (VRC), levofloxacin (LVX), and rifampicin (RFN) were evaluated by conventional planktonic techniques, crystal violet, XTT, qPCR, and viable plate count.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> Af planktonic cells and biofilms in formation were more susceptible to AMB, ITC, and VRC than Af mature biofilms. Af mature biofilms were susceptible to AMB, but not to ITC and VRC. Based on viable plate count, a lower concentration of LVX and RFN was required to reduce Sm cell numbers on biofilms in formation compared with mature biofilms. The antibiosis effect of Sm on Af growth was more pronounced for the association of CF strains that exhibited a higher fitness than the reference strains. In Af-Sm biofilms, the fungal susceptibility to AMB was increased compared with Af biofilms. In contrast, the bacterial susceptibility to LVX decreased in Af-Sm biofilms and was fungal biomass-dependent. The combination of AMB (64 μg/mL) with LVX or RFN (4 μg/mL) was efficient to impair Af and Sm growth in the polymicrobial biofilm.</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> Sm increased the Af susceptibility to AMB, whereas Af protected Sm from LVX. Interactions between Af and Sm within biofilms modulate susceptibility to antimicrobial agents, opening the way to new antimicrobial strategies in CF patients.</p>