AUTHOR=Goggin Rachel K. , Bennett Catherine A. , Bassiouni Ahmed , Bialasiewicz Seweryn , Vreugde Sarah , Wormald Peter-John , Psaltis Alkis J.
TITLE=Comparative Viral Sampling in the Sinonasal Passages; Different Viruses at Different Sites
JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
VOLUME=8
YEAR=2018
URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00334
DOI=10.3389/fcimb.2018.00334
ISSN=2235-2988
ABSTRACT=Background: With the emergence of the microbiome as an important factor in health and disease in the respiratory tract standardised, validated techniques are required for its accurate characterisation. No standardised technique has been reported specifically for viral sampling in the sinonasal passages.
Aim: To optimise viral sampling techniques from the sinonasal cavity.
Methods: Sterile cytology brushes were used under endoscopic guidance to sample the sinonasal mucosa at time of endoscopic sinus surgery at both the middle and inferior meatuses (MM and IM). DNA and RNA were extracted from the samples and underwent PCR or RT-PCR testing, respectively, for a panel of 15 common upper respiratory tract viruses.
Results: Twenty-four adult patients were recruited for this study. 18/24 (75%) patients were positive for virus in at least one site, while 8/24 (33%) were positive for virus at both sites. The mean number of viruses identified at the two sites were similar (0.875 ± 0.899 at the MM vs. 0.750 ± 1.032 at the IM). 6/24 (25%) of patients showed no virus at either site, while 3/24 (12.5%) demonstrated the same viral species at both sites.
Conclusion: Although the number of viruses present at different sites with the nasal cavity are similar, discord exists in the viral species between sites. It is therefore recommended that both sites are sampled in the clinical and research setting better to characterise the viral species within the nasal cavity.