Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 18 September 2018
Sec. Molecular Bacterial Pathogenesis
This article is part of the Research Topic The Pathogenic Yersiniae – Advances in the Understanding of Physiology and Virulence, Volume II View all 15 articles

Yersinia pseudotuberculosis BarA-UvrY Two-Component Regulatory System Represses Biofilms via CsrB

  • 1Department of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States
  • 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States

The formation of biofilms by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (Yptb) and Y. pestis requires the hmsHFRS genes, which direct production of a polysaccharide extracellular matrix (Hms-ECM). Despite possessing identical hmsHFRS sequences, Yptb produces much less Hms-ECM than Y. pestis. The regulatory influences that control Yptb Hms-ECM production and biofilm formation are not fully understood. In this study, negative regulators of biofilm production in Yptb were identified. Inactivation of the BarA/UvrY two-component system or the CsrB regulatory RNA increased binding of Congo Red dye, which correlates with extracellular polysaccharide production. These mutants also produced biofilms that were substantially more cohesive than the wild type strain. Disruption of uvrY was not sufficient for Yptb to cause proventricular blockage during infection of Xenopsylla cheopis fleas. However, this strain was less acutely toxic toward fleas than wild type Yptb. Flow cytometry measurements of lectin binding indicated that Yptb BarA/UvrY/CsrB mutants may produce higher levels of other carbohydrates in addition to poly-GlcNAc Hms-ECM. In an effort to characterize the relevant downstream targets of the BarA/UvrY system, we conducted a proteomic analysis to identify proteins with lower abundance in the csrB::Tn5 mutant strain. Urease subunit proteins were less abundant and urease enzymatic activity was lower, which likely reduced toxicity toward fleas. Loss of CsrB impacted expression of several potential regulatory proteins that may influence biofilms, including the RcsB regulator. Overexpression of CsrB did not alter the Congo-red binding phenotype of an rcsB::Tn5 mutant, suggesting that the effect of CsrB on biofilms may require RcsB. These results underscore the regulatory and compositional differences between Yptb and Y. pestis biofilms. By activating CsrB expression, the Yptb BarA/UvrY two-component system has pleiotropic effects that impact biofilm production and stability.

Introduction

Like many bacteria, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (Yptb) in varied environments such as soil and water face temperature extremes, desiccation, nutrient deprivation, or nematode predation, and their survival is enhanced by efficient biofilm production. Transmission of Yersinia pestis by fleas is also significantly influenced by biofilm production. One transmission mechanism exhibited by some fleas requires Y. pestis to form biofilm on the spines that line the interior surface of the flea's proventriculus (Hinnebusch et al., 1996; Jarrett et al., 2004). Biofilm formation in both Yptb and Y. pestis is aided by the hmsHFRS gene products, which together direct the synthesis of an extracellular matrix (ECM) containing poly-β-1,6 linked N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (β-1,6-GlcNAc) (Bobrov et al., 2008; Erickson et al., 2008; Hinnebusch and Erickson, 2008). HmsR and HmsS are inner-membrane proteins that may assemble polymers from UDP-N-acetylglucosamine in the cytoplasm. The polymer is likely deacetylated by HmsF prior to export and transport through the outer membrane porin HmsH. Hms-ECM production by Yptb and Y. pestis can be visualized as Congo red binding (pigmentation) on agar plates. All four of the hmsHFRS gene products are required for pigmentation and biofilm, and inactivation of the periplasmic, deacetylase, and glycosyl transferase domains of HmsH, F, and R, respectively, reduces Congo red binding and in vitro biofilm formation (Forman et al., 2006).

Recent efforts have focused on understanding how biofilm production in Y. pestis is regulated. Multiple regulatory influences of the Hms-ECM in Y. pestis have been identified including temperature (Perry et al., 2004), polyamines (Wortham et al., 2010), and the second messenger cyclic-diguanylate (c-di-GMP) (Kirillina et al., 2004; Bobrov et al., 2011). Hms-ECM is produced at growth temperatures ≤26°C (Perry et al., 1990; Hinnebusch et al., 1996; Darby et al., 2002; Jarrett et al., 2004). Temperature regulation is achieved in part by the reduced translation or stability of HmsH, HmsR and the diguanylate cyclase HmsT (Perry et al., 2004) at temperatures above 28°C. High levels of cyclic diguanylate in the cell may increase the glycosyl transferase activity of HmsR (Bobrov et al., 2008). Y. pestis contains an additional diguanylate cyclase (HmsD) that enhances biofilm formation in the flea digestive tract (Bobrov et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2011).

Less is known about the regulation of biofilm in Yptb. Although Yptb, like Y. pestis, forms Hms-dependent biofilms in vitro and on the outer mouthparts of Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes (Darby et al., 2002; Joshua et al., 2003), the majority of Yptb strains do not form pigmented colonies on Congo-red agar. Additionally, Yptb never forms biofilm on the flea proventriculus to cause blockage of the digestive tract, even though it can colonize the flea midgut (Erickson et al., 2006). Compositional changes in the ECM of Y. pestis and Yptb may contribute to this difference but it is now clear that during the evolution of Y. pestis, mutations in genes that affect the regulation of Hms protein synthesis or production and stability of the ECM have been selected. Functional regulatory mechanisms that repress Hms-dependent ECM production in Yptb such as the RcsA transcriptional regulator (Sun et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2015), the NghA glycosyl hydrolase (Erickson et al., 2008), and additional enzymes that produce or degrade cyclic diguanylate (Bobrov et al., 2011) have been lost or altered during the emergence of Y. pestis, which have enhanced its biofilm production within fleas.

In this study we sought to identify additional regulatory mechanisms that repress production of extracellular polysaccharides in Yptb. A screen for mutants with enhanced Congo Red pigmentation phenotypes suggested a role for the BarA/UvrY two-component regulatory system. We tested the effect of barA, uvrY and csrB mutation in Congo Red binding and biofilm stability. We sought to correlate the changes we observed in biofilm stability and Congo-red binding with production of specific carbohydrates using fluorescently-labeled lectins and flow cytometry. Finally, we employed a proteomic approach to identify multiple downstream targets of the CsrB regulatory RNA that could influence biofilm formation.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

Y. pseudotuberculosis strain IP32953 and Y. pestis KIM6+ were routinely grown at 28°C in Terrific broth (TB) or at 21°C in 1% heart infusion broth supplemented with 0.2% galactose (HIG). The transposon mutants in strain IP32953 were generated using the pRL27 Tn5 donor plasmid as described previously (Erickson et al., 2016). The mutants were plated onto HIG agar containing 0.01% Congo-Red dye. After growth on Congo-red agar plates for 48 h, mutants with increased pigmentation were selected and the location of their transposon insertions determined using arbitrary PCR and sequencing as previously described (Erickson et al., 2016).

To complement the transposon insertion mutants, copies of barA, uvrY, rcsA, and rcsB were amplified by PCR from IP32953 genomic DNA (all primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1) and inserted into pJET1.2. The CsrB expression plasmid contains the csrB sequence in plasmid pACYC184 and was generously supplied by Petra Dersch. The csrA gene was also overexpressed by cloning into pJET1.2. Plasmids were created in E. coli strain DH5α and transferred to Yptb by electroporation.

Biofilm Tests

Liquid biofilms were grown in 24-well plates in 1 ml of HIG broth. The plates were incubated at 21°C for 48 h with shaking at 100 rpm. The unattached cells were removed and the wells were gently washed with 1 ml water, and then the plates were dried for 30 min at 80°C. The attached cells were stained for 20 min with 0.1% crystal violet and rinsed 3 times with water. The bound dye was solubilized by adding 1 ml DMSO and then the absorbance was measured at 590 nm.

To measure biofilm stability, biofilms were grown on 0.2 μm polycarbonate filters (25 mm) placed on HIG agar plates. After growth in liquid media overnight, 5 μl of saturated culture was added to the filters and incubated for 72 h. The filters containing the biofilms were transferred to 50 ml conical tubes containing 40 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The tubes were placed horizontally and shaken at 100 rpm for 1 h. The density of the cells that were dislodged during this time was measured by spectrophotometry at 600 nm. The tubes were then vortexed vigorously for 5 min to suspend all of the bacteria that were present on the filters, and the density of the total population was measured. The absorbance of the biofilm cells that were initially dislodged was divided by the absorbance after vortexing to calculate the percent disruption after 1 h.

Lectin Binding Flow Cytometry

Bacteria were grown on HIG agar plates for 24 h. Single colonies were washed and resuspended in 300 μl of 20 mM HEPES buffer containing 0.1 mM each of MgCl2, CaCl2, MnCl2. Washed bacteria were diluted 1:10 into HEPES buffer containing 0.2 mg/ml FITC-labeled lectin (Wheat germ agglutinin or Ulex europaeus agglutinin, Sigma). Samples were incubated on ice in the dark for 30 min and then washed twice in HEPES buffer and finally resuspended in HEPES containing 1% formaldehyde. The fluorescence of individual bacterial cells was measured using a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer. Negative control samples contained bacteria with no lectin added. The specificity of the lectin binding was assessed by adding 10 mM N,-N′-Diacetylchitobiose or L-(-)-Fucose (Sigma) to the WGA or UEA reactions, respectively.

Flea Infections

X. cheopis were orally infected with Yptb through shaved mouse skins using a membrane feeder apparatus and monitored for survival and proventricular blockage as previously described (Erickson et al., 2006, 2007; Zhou et al., 2012). For each experiment, ~200 fleas were allowed to feed on 5 ml of heparinized human blood containing 5–8 × 108 colony-forming units (CFU) Yptb wild type IP32953 or uvrY::Tn5 per ml. Feedings lasted 1 h, and the blood was kept at 37°C during the feeding. Control fleas were fed under the same conditions, on the same blood source but without bacteria. All of the female fleas that ingested blood meals were separated and monitored for 24 h to determine acute toxicity. All of the male fleas were visually inspected for development of proventricular blockage characterized by appearance of fresh blood in the esophagus but not the midgut during twice-weekly feedings for 4 weeks. After 28 days, 20 fleas from each group were homogenized and plated on TB agar containing 1 μg/ml irgasan, 0.5 μg/ml crystal violet, and 1 mg/ml bile salts to determine the proportion of fleas that remained infected throughout the experiment.

Proteome Samples

Samples for label-free proteomic analysis of wild-type and csrB::Tn5 mutant were prepared using a filter aided sample preparation (FASP) protocol as described previously (Wiśniewski et al., 2009). Bacteria were grown for 24 h at 21°C on solid HIG media and then washed and frozen. Frozen cell pellets were dropped into 95°C SDT lysis buffer (4% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1M dithiothreitol) and incubated at 95°C for 10 m. Cell suspensions were sonicated for 30 s (3 Watts of power) and incubated for an additional 10 m at 95°C. Cell extracts were clarified, and clarified lysate was mixed with UA (8 M urea, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5) in a ratio of 1:5 and applied to Vivacon-500 30,000 MWCO filters (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). The filters were washed twice with 100 μL buffer UA. Filters were then incubated 20 min in the dark with 100 μL buffer UA amended with 50 mM iodoacetamide and washed twice with UA and twice with 100 μL 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Samples were then digested with trypsin (1 μg proteomic grade trypsin added to 40 μg of total protein in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate). The filters were incubated at 37°C for 16 h. Peptides were eluted with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and acidified to 1% formic acid.

Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled With Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and Data Analysis

Tryptic peptides from the wild-type and the mutant csrB::Tn5 were analyzed with reversed phase chromatography (RPC) on an Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) Eksigent NanoLC system coupled with an LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with an electrospray ionization source (ESI). Specifically, 4 μL of digested proteins were loaded on to a C18-trap column (Waters Corporation), and were desalted with 97% mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in H2O, Optima) and 3% of mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in CH3CN, Optima) at a flow rate of 4 μL/min for 10 min. A linear gradient at a flow rate of 325 nL/min changing from 3 to 35% of mobile phase B was then applied to load the peptides onto an online Waters Peptide Separation Technology C18 column in 90 min, and further sprayed into LTQ Orbitrap XL MS. The mass spectrometer was operated in the positive ion mode, and MS1 was analyzed at a resolution of 60,000 at m/z 400. MS/MS fragmentation analysis was performed on the top 10 most abundant MS1 precursor ions with collision-induced dissociation at a collision energy of 35 V. The online XCalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for data collection. MaxQuant software (Max Plank Institute of Biochemistry) was utilized for MS-based proteomics data analysis, e.g., protein identification and quantification. A Yptb IP32953 FASTA file downloaded from Uniprot (The UniProt, 2017) was applied for protein identification with 1% false discovery rate (FDR). A label free quantification (LFQ) approach was utilized for screening differently expressed proteins, with LFQ min. ratio count set as 2.

Urease Assay

Urease activity was quantified as previously described (Onal Okyay and Frigi Rodrigues, 2013) with modifications. Bacteria grown in HIG were pelleted, washed, and resuspended in PBS to an absorbance (600 nm) of 1.0. Stuart's broth (20 g/L urea, 0.1 g/L yeast extract, 0.095 g/L disodium phosphate, 0.091 g/L monopotassium phosphate, 0.01 g/L phenol red) was used as the assay medium. Bacterial suspensions (20 μl) were added to 1 ml Stuart's broth and incubated at 21°C. Every 20 min for 4 h, the absorbance at 560 nm was measured, which corresponds to an increase in pH due to the hydrolysis of urea detected by the color change from yellow to pink of the phenol red indicator.

Results

Yptb Mutants That Form Pigmented Colonies on Congo-Red Agar

To identify genes that repress the formation of the Hms-dependent ECM, we used random Tn5 mutagenesis of Yptb strain IP32953, which normally forms white or very light-pink colonies on Congo-red agar. From a screen of ~15,000 colonies from four different mutagenesis experiments, we isolated 35 mutants that consistently produced colonies that were noticeably darker than the wild-type when grown at 21°C on Congo-red agar. We identified the transposon insertion sites by sequencing arbitrary PCR products and comparing these sequences to the Yptb IP32953 genome. The locations of the insertions are listed in Table 1. As expected, we obtained insertion mutants in several known negative regulators of Hms expression, including the rcsA and rcsB transcriptional regulators of the Rcs phosphorelay system and the phosphodiesterase hmsP. Insertions were also found in or near genes not previously reported to affect Hms function, including transcriptional regulator nhaR, the chaperone djlA, and the DNA-binding protein dps. NhaR is a transcriptional activator of the E. coli pgaABCD genes, which are orthologs of the hmsHFRS operon (Goller et al., 2006; Cerca and Jefferson, 2008). DjlA is a member of the DnaJ family of inner membrane co-chaperone proteins, whose overexpression leads to increased production of E. coli colanic acid capsule via activation of the Rcs phosphorelay system (Clarke et al., 1997; Chen et al., 2001; Shiba et al., 2006).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Yptb strain IP32953 Tn5 insertion mutants with increased Congo-red binding.

We obtained several independent insertions in the genes encoding the BarA sensor kinase, the UvrY response regulator, and the CsrB small RNA that resulted in increased pigmentation on Congo-red plates. The CsrA regulatory protein is an RNA-binding protein that primarily represses translation of target mRNA molecules by binding at sites containing A/UCANGGANGU/A motifs, often at or near the Shine-Dalgarno sequence (Timmermans and Van Melderen, 2010). The pgaABCD transcript in E. coli contains three CsrA-binding sites in its 5′ untranslated region (Wang et al., 2005), and mutants that lack CsrA produce higher than normal levels of β-1,6-GlcNAc polysaccharide. CsrB and CsrC are small RNAs with high affinity for CsrA that when expressed can relieve CsrA-mediated inhibition of translation. In response to accumulation of by-products of glycolysis such as acetate and formate (Chavez et al., 2010), BarA phosphorylates UvrY, which then activates transcription of genes including the CsrB regulatory RNA (Suzuki et al., 2002). Thus, mutations in barA, uvrY, or csrB decrease β-1,6-GlcNAc production in E. coli. Our transposon mutagenesis results suggested that the opposite is true in Yptb, which led us to focus our investigation on this regulatory system.

The Role of BarA/UvrY/CsrB on Biofilm Stability and Extracellular Polysaccharide Production

In order to verify that the transposon insertions did not affect expression of other genes, we complemented uvrY::Tn5 and barA::Tn5 strains with plasmids containing functional barA or uvrY genes. Overexpression of barA restored the wild-type phenotype (non-pigmented colonies) in the barA::Tn5 background. However, overexpression of uvrY in this strain resulted in an intermediate pigmentation phenotype, suggesting that phosphorylation of UvrY by BarA is required for UvrY to fully activate the relevant downstream targets. Overexpression of CsrB in both the barA::Tn5 and uvrY::Tn5 strains restored the non-pigmented phenotype, suggesting that the regulatory effect of BarA/UvrY occurs largely through CsrB and its regulation of CsrA. When we overexpressed the CsrA regulatory protein in wild type Yptb the cells were highly pigmented, but they grew more slowly and many non-pigmented colonies appeared in the population (data not shown) suggesting a toxic effect. Thus, the effect of the BarA/UvrY/CsrB system most likely affects pigmentation by regulating CsrA activity.

To define the role of this system in biofilm production, we first tested the ability of Yptb mutants lacking BarA or UvrY to form biofilms in 24-well polystyrene plates (Figure 1). The uvrY::Tn5 and csrB::Tn5 strains formed slightly thicker biofilms than the wild type, whereas the barA mutant strain was not significantly different from wild type in this assay. Similar to the Congo-red binding, overexpression of CsrB was sufficient to reduce biofilm production in the barA::Tn5 and uvrY::Tn5 mutants.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. BarA, UvrY, and CsrB negatively regulate biofilm production in Yptb IP32953. Congo-red binding phenotypes were qualitatively assessed and categorized (light pink indicates little to no binding and red indicates strongly pigmented colonies). Biofilm attachment after 48 h to polystyrene plates was quantified by crystal violet staining (A590nm). Results are means and standard deviations for a representative experiment (n = 3) that was performed three times. One-way ANOVA analysis was performed with Tukey's correction for multiple comparisons and strains significantly different from the wild type strain are indicated (*adjusted P-value < 0.05, ** < 0.01).

We used an additional assay specifically to investigate the cohesiveness of the biofilms formed by these strains. We allowed biofilms to form on polycarbonate filters and then measured the tendency of the biofilm to become dislodged and cells to become suspended in solution. The biofilms were placed in tubes with saline and agitated. The proportion of the biofilm that was dislodged and suspended in the solution was measured after a 1-h period (Figure 2). This assay showed that the wild type biofilms were easily disrupted, whereas the csrB::Tn5 and uvrY::Tn5 biofilms strongly adhered together. The barA::Tn5 biofilms were less cohesive than the uvrY::Tn5 or csrB::Tn5 biofilms but more than the wild type, similar to the Congo-red binding results.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Loss of uvrY or csrB increases the cohesiveness of Yptb biofilms. Biofilms of each strain were grown on polycarbonate filters and then transferred to saline and agitated for 1 h. The proportion of the biofilm that was disrupted by the agitation was measured. Results are means and standard deviations of three independent experiments. One-way ANOVA analysis was performed with Tukey's correction for multiple comparisons. Columns with the same letter (a, b, c) are not significantly different from each other (95% confidence interval).

Since the uvrY::Tn5 mutant produces strongly cohesive biofilms in vitro, we considered whether this strain could form biofilms in fleas and cause proventricular blockage similar to Y. pestis, or to Yptb mutants that lack rcsA, hmsT and hmsD (Sun et al., 2014). We infected Xenopsylla cheopis fleas with wild type Yptb or the uvrY::Tn5 mutant, and monitored the fleas for 28 days for signs of proventricular blockage. Although both strains were able to colonize and maintain stable infections, none of the fleas were observed to develop blockage over this period. However, more fleas infected with the mutant strain survived the first 24 h after infection than with the wild type strain (Figure 3), suggesting that UvrY may regulate acute toxicity of Yptb within the flea digestive tract.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Loss of uvrY does not affect Yptb colonization or blockage due to biofilm but does reduce acute oral toxicity toward X. cheopis fleas. Fleas were fed blood meals containing 108 CFU/ml wild type or uvrY::Tn5 mutant strain. (A) The proportion of fed fleas that died within 24 h of infection was significantly less for the uvrY::Tn5 mutant compared to the wild type strain (**p < 0.01 by unpaired T-test) in three independent feeding experiments. (B) Proportions of fleas that remained infected with the uvrY::Tn5 mutant or wild type strain after 28 days. No signs of proventricular blockage were observed in any Yptb-infected fleas (wild type or mutant) during twice-weekly feedings.

Pigmentation of Yersinia colonies on Congo-red agar is correlated with Hms-ECM production, but additional proteins and carbohydrates are also able to bind the dye. To more specifically assess the surface carbohydrate differences in these strains, we employed fluorescently-labeled lectins with affinity to specific sugars. Flow cytometry was used to measure the fluorescence of individual bacteria after labeling with wheat-germ agglutinin (WGA, Figures 4A,B), which binds to dimers or trimers of N-acetylglucosamine, or to Ulex europaeus agglutinin (UEA-1, Figures 4C,D), which binds to α-linked fucose residues. We measured the percentage of bacteria within each sample with detectable lectin binding (% positive, Figures 4A,C) as well as the mean fluorescence of the entire population (Figures 4B,D). We found that the binding of WGA to Y. pestis KIM6+ was very high, and this binding was strongly inhibited by addition of competing N-acetyl-chitobiose. UEA-1 bound only modestly to Y. pestis, consistent with the majority of the extracellular carbohydrate consisting of Hms-ECM. Surprisingly, the wild type Yptb strain did not bind detectably to WGA and only moderately to UEA-1. This binding was not inhibited by the addition of competing chitobiose (for WGA) or fucose (for UEA-1), suggesting the possibility of secondary or tertiary sugar preferences for lectin binding to these bacteria. The csrB::Tn5 mutant strain bound more WGA lectin than the wild type strain, which is consistent with greater Hms-ECM production, but again the addition of competing chitobiose did not reduce lectin binding. Surprisingly, the rcsB::Tn5 mutant strain, which is known to express high levels of cyclic diguanylate and Hms-ECM, bound more strongly to UEA-1 than to WGA. These results suggest differences in the extracellular matrix between Y. pestis and Yptb.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Loss of rcsB and csrB alters lectin binding to bacterial surfaces. Bacteria were incubated with FITC-labeled WGA (A,B) or UEA (C,D) lectins. Flow cytometry was used to measure the proportion of bacteria with any detectable binding (A,C) or the mean fluorescence of the population (B,D). For each strain that was tested, a control with no lectin was included to establish baseline fluorescence, as well as samples with competing sugars (chitobiose or fucose). Results are means and standard deviations for a representative experiment that was performed four times. To see if the csrB::Tn5 or rcsB::Tn5 mutants bound lectin differently than the wild type strain, one-way ANOVA analysis was performed with Tukey's correction for multiple comparisons using the lectin-treated samples (blue bars). The csrB::Tn5 and rcsB::Tn5 mutants bound significantly more WGA than the wild type strain, but only the rcsB::Tn5 mutant bound more UEA than wild type. Y. pestis binding was tested as a control, and it bound to WGA far more efficiently than Yptb (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001).

Proteomic Investigation of BarA/UvrY Regulation Through CsrB

Phosphorylated UvrY upregulates CsrB expression in E. coli and Yersinia. Multiple copies of CsrA protein are bound by CsrB RNA, thus preventing it from binding its target mRNAs. In E. coli, CsrA binds to pgaABCD transcripts to repress their translation. CsrA is most often a translational repressor, but enhances translation of some target mRNAs (Potts et al., 2017). Unlike the pgaABCD upstream region, no obvious CsrA binding sites were identified within the coding sequences or in the 500 bp region immediately upstream of the hmsH start codon. We therefore considered whether the CsrA protein of Yptb could instead repress other negative regulators of Hms activity. We applied a proteomic approach on whole cell lysates prepared from wild type Yptb strain and the csrB::Tn5 mutant using LC-MS/MS analysis and mapping the peptide fragments to the Yptb IP32953 database. We selected proteins that were at least 1.5-fold changed in abundance between the two strains (Supplementary Table 2). As expected, the vast majority of the differentially expressed proteins were less abundant in the csrB mutant, consistent with the role of CsrA protein as mainly a repressor of translation.

The global changes in transcript abundance in a Yptb strain YPIII csrA mutant were recently reported by Bücker et al. (2014). Many of the genes that are upregulated in their study showed lower protein levels in this analysis of strain IP32953 csrB::Tn5 mutant. The RovA (SlyA) protein is known to be repressed by CsrA (Heroven et al., 2008), and our data indicated a 28-fold decrease in RovA abundance. RovA is controlled by CsrA through the RovM protein, which is activated by CsrA (Heroven et al., 2008). RovM peptides were not detected among the wild type samples, but were in the csrB::Tn5 mutant (Supplementary Table 2). Several additional regulatory proteins that could regulate biofilm production were repressed in the csrB::Tn5 mutant strain. Nucleoid-associated proteins, including Integration Host Factor alpha (IHFα, 11.8-fold reduction) and histone-like nucleoid structuring protein (H-NS, 24-fold reduction) function to silence and activate gene expression on a global scale (Dillon and Dorman, 2010). IHFα was also identified in our initial transposon screen for mutants that exhibit enhanced Congo-red binding (Table 1). H-NS represses expression of horizontally acquired genes (Lucchini et al., 2006), and the hmsHFRS operon is contained within the mobile Yersinia high-pathogenicity island (Lillard et al., 1997). H-NS also represses expression of pgaABCD and biofilm production in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (Bossé et al., 2010). H-NS is believed to be essential for Yersinia survival (Ellison and Miller, 2006), so we were unlikely to identify it in our transposon screen.

We identified transposon insertions in both rcsA and rcsB in our screen for Congo-red binding mutants (Table 1). The Yptb RcsB transcriptional regulatory protein, together with RcsA, represses transcription of the diguanylate cyclases hmsT and hmsD, thereby reducing biofilm production. Y. pestis rcsA has a frameshift mutation, thus eliminating this repression and enhancing biofilms (Sun et al., 2008, 2014; Sun Y. C. et al., 2012; Guo et al., 2015). To ensure that the transposon insertions in rcsA and rcsB were not affecting other genes, we complemented both mutants via plasmids containing functional copies of these genes. The rcsB::Tn5 mutant was complemented with a plasmid containing rcsB. The rcsA::Tn5 mutant was able to be complemented via rcsA from Yptb but not from Y. pestis, consistent with the frameshift mutation in Y. pestis rcsA. Our proteomic data revealed that csrB::Tn5 produced 8-fold less RcsB protein than the wild type strain (Supplementary Table 2). CsrA has not been previously shown to repress expression of RcsB directly or indirectly. To test the relationship between rcsB and CsrB further, we overexpressed CsrB in the Yptb rcsA::Tn5 or rcsB::Tn5 mutant strains (Figure 5). Unlike in the uvrY::Tn5 or barA::Tn5 mutants, CsrB expression did not reduce Congo-red binding in the rcsA or rcsB mutants. This suggests the possibility that CsrB competes with rcsB transcripts for CsrA binding. The predicted secondary structure of the rcsB transcript contains a stem-loop with an exposed GGA motif overlapping the Shine-Delgarno sequence (Supplementary Figure 1), which is characteristic of CsrA targets (Romeo and Babitzke, 2018). Alternatively, the absence of a functional Rcs phosphorelay could overpower the negative regulatory effects of CsrB.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Biofilm and Congo-red binding by rcsA and rcsB mutants is not affected by overexpression of CsrB. Congo-red binding phenotypes and biofilm attachment in polystyrene plates after 48 h were measured in wild type Yptb and in rcsA::Tn5 or rcsB::Tn5 mutants. The effects of plasmids containing rcsA from Yptb (pRcsAYPTB) or Y. pestis (pRcsAYP) were determined in the rcsA::Tn5 mutant strain. The rcsB::Tn5 mutant was complemented with a plasmid containing rcsB from Yptb. Overexpression of CsrB (pCsrB), which reduced Congo-red binding and biofilm production in barA::Tn5 and uvrY::Tn5 mutants (Figure 1), was also tested in the rcsA and rcsB mutants. Results are means and standard deviations for a representative experiment (n = 3) that was performed four times. One-way ANOVA analysis was performed with Tukey's correction for multiple comparisons. Values that were significantly different from the wild type are indicated (***adjusted P-value < 0.001, **** adjusted P-value < 0.0001).

Urease subunit proteins were also substantially reduced in the csrB::Tn5 mutant (Supplementary Table 2). The urease structural proteins (UreA 59-fold, UreB 21-fold, UreC 21-fold), and the accessory proteins (UreE 1423-fold, UreF undetected, UreG 45-fold, UreD 71-fold), make up the multimeric urease enzyme. Y. pestis lacks a functional UreD subunit, which is sufficient to eliminate urease activity (Sebbane et al., 2001). Unlike Y. pestis, Yptb strains are acutely toxic to X. cheopis fleas (Erickson et al., 2007), and restoration of urease also restores toxicity to Y. pestis (Chouikha and Hinnebusch, 2014). Since the uvrY::Tn5 mutant was also less toxic to fleas, we tested whether this strain produces less urease enzyme. The wild type strain produced much more urease than the uvrY::Tn5 mutant (Figure 6). The csrB::Tn5 mutant also produced much less urease, and no urease activity was detected using Y. pestis KIM6+. During the preparation of this manuscript, it was also reported by Dai et al. that CsrA represses urease production in Yptb strain YPIII, which is consistent with our results (Dai et al., 2018).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. UvrY and CsrB positively regulate urease. Equal numbers of bacteria were suspended in Stuart's broth and pH change due to hydrolysis of urea was detected by color change from yellow to pink (picture from left to right: wild type Yptb, uvrY::Tn5, csrB::Tn5, and Y. pestis after 4 h). Urease was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 560 nm (left panel) every 20 min. Results are means and standard deviations of three independent experiments. Multiple t-tests of the data were performed with a false-discovery rate (Q) value set to 1.000%, without assuming a consistent SD. The uvrY::Tn5 and csrB::Tn5 mutant strains were significantly different (p < 0.05) from the wild type strain at every time point after 60 min.

Discussion

Switching between planktonic and sessile modes of growth is a tightly controlled process involving multiple levels of transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Successful navigation of this transition is critically important to the success of pathogenic yersiniae (Chen et al., 2016). In this study we demonstrated that the BarA/UvrY two component system as well as the small RNA CsrB repress biofilm production in Yptb. Disruption of CsrB increased biofilm production while at the same time reducing urease-mediated toxicity toward fleas. Many bacterial pathogens, including Yersinia (Bobrov et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2013; Redelman et al., 2014), exhibit an inverse relationship between biofilm production and acute virulence. The regulatory networks that govern transition between highly toxic phenotypes and the biofilm mode of growth are of interest as possible therapeutic targets. CsrB is known to exert its effects by occupying CsrA proteins, thereby altering expression of CsrA-controlled regulatory proteins and cell-envelope structures that have pleiotropic effects.

Previous work has shown that in Yptb strain YPIII, UvrY (and CsrB) expression is normally repressed by the cyclic AMP-Crp complex except during times of nutrient deprivation (Heroven et al., 2012). Starvation conditions would therefore be predicted to promote motility and reduce biofilm formation by reducing the concentration of free CsrA proteins. The downstream targets of CsrA that mediate the biofilm-specific effects are not completely known and may be different between individual strains of Yptb or in Y. pestis. In Yptb strain YPIII, CsrA indirectly activates expression of the RovM transcriptional regulatory protein (Heroven et al., 2008). RovM binds the promoter regions of the flhDC flagellar regulatory genes, the hmsHFRS operon, and the rovA virulence regulator (Heroven et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2017). Binding of RovM represses flhDC and enhances hmsHFRS and rovA transcription. Others have also shown that CsrA enhances biofilms in Y. pestis (Willias et al., 2015). However, loss of CsrA did not change Y. pestis hmsHFRS, hmsT, or hmsP transcription as occurs in Yptb. It will be interesting to determine if RovM activates hmsHFRS in Y. pestis, or whether RovM is controlled by CsrA in the same fashion as in Yptb. We did not identify any transposon insertions in the rovM gene (YPTB2588) in our screen for Congo-red binding mutants. This could be because the expression of rovM is very low in nutrient-rich conditions such as were used in our study (Heroven and Dersch, 2006). Indeed, RovM protein levels in the wild type strain were below the limit of detection in our proteomic analysis. However, RovM peptides were detected in the csrB mutant samples, consistent with CsrA being an activator or RovM expression in Yptb strain IP32953. We also did not obtain any transposon insertion mutants in the CsrC regulatory RNA gene in our screen. In contrast to E. coli, expression of CsrC is not activated by UvrY in Yptb strain YPIII (Heroven et al., 2008). Rather, when CsrB expression is triggered by UvrY, CsrC is repressed by a mechanism that is yet to be determined.

In addition to RovM, our results suggest that other regulatory proteins that control biofilm attachment and stability are under the influence of CsrA. These include the RcsA and RcsB transcriptional regulatory proteins. The Rcs phosphorelay system contains a sensor kinase RcsC that autophosphorylates upon detection of signals that include cellular stress. The phosphate is then transferred through RcsD to RcsB, which then dimerizes and binds to specific promoter sequences. RcsB may also form heterodimers with RcsA, and RcsAB binding represses transcription of diguanylate cyclases hmsD and hmsT, as well as the hmsHFRS operon (Sun Y. C. et al., 2012; Fang et al., 2015). The rcsA gene has been disrupted in Y. pestis, which was a key event in the evolution of Y. pestis transmission by fleas because it greatly enhanced cyclic di-GMP and biofilm production (Sun et al., 2008, 2014). We found that when rcsA or rcsB were non-functional, overexpression of CsrB did not reduce Congo-red pigmentation or prevent biofilm formation. In our analysis of the csrB::Tn5 mutant proteins, RcsA and RcsB proteins were both decreased compared to the wild type strain. These results are suggestive of a possible direct interaction between CsrA and rcsA or rcsB transcripts, particularly in the case of rcsB.

Disruption of uvrY or csrB had a very strong effect on the cohesiveness of Yptb biofilms. We considered that the most likely explanation for this would be increased abundance of extracellular polysaccharide contained in the biofilm matrix, specifically the Hms-ECM in these mutants. Yersinia biofilms are often described as bacteria encased in a homopolymer of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (Hms-ECM) (Zhou and Yang, 2011; Sun F. et al., 2012). Hms-ECM is almost certainly present in Y. pestis and Yptb biofilms, based on antigenic cross-reactivity of Y. pestis biofilms with antibodies directed against purified poly-N-acetylglucosamine (Erickson et al., 2006) and from the extensive genetic data showing the impact of hmsHFRS on biofilms in both species. However, our results also suggest that loss of CsrB could control biofilm production by affecting expression of other cell surface molecules. The binding of WGA lectin to Yptb mutants that were strongly pigmented on Congo-red agar was far less than what we observed for Y. pestis, and binding was barely detectable for the wild type IP32953 strain. Binding of UEA-1 lectin, which is specific for fucose, was increased in the rcsB mutant to a greater degree than WGA lectin, which is specific for N-acetylglucosamine. However, these results are complicated by the fact that addition of competing sugars did not reduce lectin binding, except for WGA and Y. pestis. The possibility of other proteins, carbohydrates, or nucleic acids within Yersinia biofilms deserves further investigation, particularly in Yptb. It is likely that Hms-ECM is increased on the surface of uvrY, csrB and rcsB Yptb mutants, but other macromolecules within the biofilm matrix may interfere with efficient WGA lectin binding. The presence of additional carbohydrates within Yersinia biofilms is suggested by previous lectin binding experiments in other Yptb strains (Tan and Darby, 2004) as well as genetic studies showing that lipopolysaccharide genes are required for efficient biofilm production in Y. pestis (Liu et al., 2016). Yptb biofilm extracellular matrix also contains extracellular DNA (Atkinson et al., 2011). The protein component of Yersinia biofilms has not been well-studied, but even when lacking the Hms polysaccharide, Y. pestis can form biofilm-like aggregates that resist killing by neutrophils (Jarrett et al., 2004). The biochemical nature of the components within these aggregates is unknown, but may suggest that specific Yersinia proteins that perform stabilizing and attachment (Fong and Yildiz, 2015) or immune evasion functions within the ECM await discovery.

Author Contributions

JS, JP, and DE conceived and designed the experimental procedures, JS, RS, MS, JC, HK, and DE performed the experiments and carried out data analysis, JS and DE wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a Mentoring Environment Grant from Brigham Young University.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Petra Dersch for the CsrB expression plasmid.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00323/full#supplementary-material

References

Atkinson, S., Goldstone, R. J., Joshua, G. W., Chang, C. Y., Patrick, H. L., Camara, M., et al. (2011). Biofilm development on Caenorhabditis elegans by Yersinia is facilitated by quorum sensing-dependent repression of type III secretion. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001250. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bobrov, A. G., Kirillina, O., Forman, S., Mack, D., and Perry, R. D. (2008). Insights into Yersinia pestis biofilm development: topology and co-interaction of Hms inner membrane proteins involved in exopolysaccharide production. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 1419–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01554.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bobrov, A. G., Kirillina, O., Ryjenkov, D. A., Waters, C. M., Price, P. A., Fetherston, J. D., et al. (2011). Systematic analysis of cyclic di-GMP signalling enzymes and their role in biofilm formation and virulence in Yersinia pestis. Mol. Microbiol. 79, 533–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07470.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bossé, J. T., Sinha, S., Li, M. S., O'Dwyer, C. A., Nash, J. H., Rycroft, A. N., et al. (2010). Regulation of pga operon expression and biofilm formation in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by sigmaE and H-NS. J. Bacteriol. 192, 2414–2423. doi: 10.1128/JB.01513-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bücker, R., Heroven, A. K., Becker, J., Dersch, P., and Wittmann, C. (2014). The pyruvate-tricarboxylic acid cycle node: a focal point of virulence control in the enteric pathogen Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 30114–30132. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.581348

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cerca, N., and Jefferson, K. K. (2008). Effect of growth conditions on poly-N-acetylglucosamine expression and biofilm formation in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 283, 36–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01142.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chavez, R. G., Alvarez, A. F., Romeo, T., and Georgellis, D. (2010). The physiological stimulus for the BarA sensor kinase. J. Bacteriol. 192, 2009–2012. doi: 10.1128/JB.01685-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, M. H., Takeda, S., Yamada, H., Ishii, Y., Yamashino, T., and Mizuno, T. (2001). Characterization of the RcsC–>YojN–>RcsB phosphorelay signaling pathway involved in capsular synthesis in Escherichia coli. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65, 2364–2367. doi: 10.1271/bbb.65.2364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, S., Thompson, K. M., and Francis, M. S. (2016). Environmental regulation of Yersinia Pathophysiology. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 6:25. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chouikha, I., and Hinnebusch, B. J. (2014). Silencing urease: a key evolutionary step that facilitated the adaptation of Yersinia pestis to the flea-borne transmission route. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 18709–18714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413209111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clarke, D. J., Holland, I. B., and Jacq, A. (1997). Point mutations in the transmembrane domain of DjlA, a membrane-linked DnaJ-like protein, abolish its function in promoting colanic acid production via the Rcs signal transduction pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 25, 933–944. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1997.mmi528.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dai, Q., Xu, L., Xiao, L., Zhu, K., Song, Y., Li, C., et al. (2018). RovM and CsrA negatively regulate urease expression in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Front. Microbiol. 9:348. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00348

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Darby, C., Hsu, J. W., Ghori, N., and Falkow, S. (2002). Caenorhabditis elegans: plague bacteria biofilm blocks food intake. Nature 417, 243–244. doi: 10.1038/417243a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dillon, S. C., and Dorman, C. J. (2010). Bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins, nucleoid structure and gene expression. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 185–195. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellison, D. W., and Miller, V. L. (2006). H-NS represses inv transcription in Yersinia enterocolitica through competition with RovA and interaction with YmoA. J. Bacteriol. 188, 5101–5112. doi: 10.1128/JB.00862-05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erickson, D. L., Jarrett, C. O., Callison, J. A., Fischer, E. R., and Hinnebusch, B. J. (2008). Loss of a biofilm-inhibiting glycosyl hydrolase during the emergence of Yersinia pestis. J. Bacteriol. 190, 8163–8170. doi: 10.1128/JB.01181-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erickson, D. L., Jarrett, C. O., Wren, B. W., and Hinnebusch, B. J. (2006). Serotype differences and lack of biofilm formation characterize Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection of the Xenopsylla cheopis flea vector of Yersinia pestis. J. Bacteriol. 188, 1113–1119. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.3.1113-1119.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erickson, D. L., Lew, C. S., Kartchner, B., Porter, N. T., McDaniel, S. W., Jones, N. M., et al. (2016). Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis genes of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis promote resistance to antimicrobial chemokines. PLoS ONE 11:e0157092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157092

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erickson, D. L., Waterfield, N. R., Vadyvaloo, V., Long, D., Fischer, E. R., Ffrench-Constant, R., et al. (2007). Acute oral toxicity of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis to fleas: implications for the evolution of vector-borne transmission of plague. Cell Microbiol. 9, 2658–2666. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00986.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, N., Yang, H., Fang, H., Liu, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., et al. (2015). RcsAB is a major repressor of Yersinia biofilm development through directly acting on hmsCDE, hmsT, and hmsHFRS. Sci. Rep. 5:9566. doi: 10.1038/srep09566

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fong, J. N., and Yildiz, F. H. (2015). Biofilm matrix proteins. Microbiol. Spectr. 3:MB-0004–2014. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0004-2014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Forman, S., Bobrov, A. G., Kirillina, O., Craig, S. K., Abney, J., Fetherston, J. D., et al. (2006). Identification of critical amino acid residues in the plague biofilm Hms proteins. Microbiology 152 (Pt. 11), 3399–3410. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.29224-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Goller, C., Wang, X., Itoh, Y., and Romeo, T. (2006). The cation-responsive protein NhaR of Escherichia coli activates pgaABCD transcription, required for production of the biofilm adhesin poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. J. Bacteriol. 188, 8022–8032. doi: 10.1128/JB.01106-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, X. P., Ren, G. X., Zhu, H., Mao, X. J., and Sun, Y. C. (2015). Differential regulation of the hmsCDE operon in Yersinia pestis and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis by the Rcs phosphorelay system. Sci. Rep. 5:8412. doi: 10.1038/srep08412

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heroven, A. K., Bohme, K., Rohde, M., and Dersch, P. (2008). A Csr-type regulatory system, including small non-coding RNAs, regulates the global virulence regulator RovA of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis through RovM. Mol. Microbiol. 68, 1179–1195. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06218.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heroven, A. K., and Dersch, P. (2006). RovM, a novel LysR-type regulator of the virulence activator gene rovA, controls cell invasion, virulence and motility of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 62, 1469–1483. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05458.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heroven, A. K., Sest, M., Pisano, F., Scheb-Wetzel, M., Steinmann, R., Bohme, K., et al. (2012). Crp induces switching of the CsrB and CsrC RNAs in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and links nutritional status to virulence. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2:158. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00158

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hinnebusch, B. J., and Erickson, D. L. (2008). Yersinia pestis biofilm in the flea vector and its role in the transmission of plague. Curr. Top Microbiol. Immunol. 322, 229–248. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hinnebusch, B. J., Perry, R. D., and Schwan, T. G. (1996). Role of the Yersinia pestis hemin storage (hms) locus in the transmission of plague by fleas. Science 273, 367–370.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Jarrett, C. O., Deak, E., Isherwood, K. E., Oyston, P. C., Fischer, E. R., Whitney, A. R., et al. (2004). Transmission of Yersinia pestis from an infectious biofilm in the flea vector. J. Infect. Dis. 190, 783–792. doi: 10.1086/422695

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Joshua, G. W., Karlyshev, A. V., Smith, M. P., Isherwood, K. E., Titball, R. W., and Wren, B. W. (2003). A Caenorhabditis elegans model of Yersinia infection: biofilm formation on a biotic surface. Microbiology 149(Pt. 11), 3221–3229. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26475-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kirillina, O., Fetherston, J. D., Bobrov, A. G., Abney, J., and Perry, R. D. (2004). HmsP, a putative phosphodiesterase, and HmsT, a putative diguanylate cyclase, control Hms-dependent biofilm formation in Yersinia pestis. Mol. Microbiol. 54, 75–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04253.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lillard, J. W. Jr., Fetherston, J. D., Pedersen, L., Pendrak, M. L., and Perry, R. D. (1997). Sequence and genetic analysis of the hemin storage (hms) system of Yersinia pestis. Gene 193, 13–21. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00071-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, L., Fang, H., Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Han, Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2016). CRP is an activator of Yersinia pestis biofilm formation that operates via a mechanism involving gmhA and waaAE-coaD. Front. Microbiol. 7:295. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lucchini, S., Rowley, G., Goldberg, M. D., Hurd, D., Harrison, M., and Hinton, J. C. (2006). H-NS mediates the silencing of laterally acquired genes in bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 2:e81. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Onal Okyay, T., and Frigi Rodrigues, D. (2013). High throughput colorimetric assay for rapid urease activity quantification. J. Microbiol. Methods 95, 324–326. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.09.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perry, R. D., Bobrov, A. G., Kirillina, O., Jones, H. A., Pedersen, L., Abney, J., et al. (2004). Temperature regulation of the hemin storage (Hms+) phenotype of Yersinia pestis is posttranscriptional. J. Bacteriol. 186, 1638–1647. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.6.1638-1647.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perry, R. D., Pendrak, M. L., and Schuetze, P. (1990). Identification and cloning of a hemin storage locus involved in the pigmentation phenotype of Yersinia pestis. J. Bacteriol. 172, 5929–5937. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.10.5929-5937.1990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Potts, A. H., Vakulskas, C. A., Pannuri, A., Yakhnin, H., Babitzke, P., and Romeo, T. (2017). Global role of the bacterial post-transcriptional regulator CsrA revealed by integrated transcriptomics. Nat. Commun. 8, 1596. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01613-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Redelman, C. V., Chakravarty, S., and Anderson, G. G. (2014). Antibiotic treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms stimulates expression of the magnesium transporter gene mgtE. Microbiology 160(Pt. 1), 165–178. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.070144-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Romeo, T., and Babitzke, P. (2018). Global regulation by CsrA and its RNA antagonists. Microbiol. Spectr. 6:RWR-0009–2017. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.RWR-0009-2017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sebbane, F., Devalckenaere, A., Foulon, J., Carniel, E., and Simonet, M. (2001). Silencing and reactivation of urease in Yersinia pestis is determined by one G residue at a specific position in the ureD gene. Infect. Immun. 69, 170–176. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.1.170-176.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shiba, Y., Matsumoto, K., and Hara, H. (2006). DjlA negatively regulates the Rcs signal transduction system in Escherichia coli. Genes Genet. Syst. 81, 51–56. doi: 10.1266/ggs.81.51

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, F., Gao, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Fang, N., Tan, Y., et al. (2012). Fur is a repressor of biofilm formation in Yersinia pestis. PLoS ONE 7:e52392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y. C., Guo, X. P., Hinnebusch, B. J., and Darby, C. (2012). The Yersinia pestis Rcs phosphorelay inhibits biofilm formation by repressing transcription of the diguanylate cyclase gene hmsT. J. Bacteriol. 194, 2020–2026. doi: 10.1128/JB.06243-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y. C., Hinnebusch, B. J., and Darby, C. (2008). Experimental evidence for negative selection in the evolution of a Yersinia pestis pseudogene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 8097–8101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803525105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y. C., Jarrett, C. O., Bosio, C. F., and Hinnebusch, B. J. (2014). Retracing the evolutionary path that led to flea-borne transmission of Yersinia pestis. Cell Host Microbe 15, 578–586. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.04.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, Y. C., Koumoutsi, A., Jarrett, C., Lawrence, K., Gherardini, F. C., Darby, C., et al. (2011). Differential control of Yersinia pestis biofilm formation in vitro and in the flea vector by two c-di-GMP diguanylate cyclases. PLoS ONE 6:e19267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Suzuki, K., Wang, X., Weilbacher, T., Pernestig, A. K., Melefors, O., Georgellis, D., et al. (2002). Regulatory circuitry of the CsrA/CsrB and BarA/UvrY systems of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 184, 5130–5140. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.18.5130-5140.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, L., and Darby, C. (2004). A movable surface: formation of Yersinia sp. biofilms on motile Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Bacteriol. 186, 5087–5092. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.15.5087-5092.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

The UniProt, C. (2017). UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D158–D169. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh131

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Timmermans, J., and Van Melderen, L. (2010). Post-transcriptional global regulation by CsrA in bacteria. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 67, 2897–2908. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0381-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Dubey, A. K., Suzuki, K., Baker, C. S., Babitzke, P., and Romeo, T. (2005). CsrA post-transcriptionally represses pgaABCD, responsible for synthesis of a biofilm polysaccharide adhesin of Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 56, 1648–1663. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04648.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Willias, S. P., Chauhan, S., Lo, C. C., Chain, P. S., and Motin, V. L. (2015). CRP-mediated carbon catabolite regulation of Yersinia pestis biofilm formation is enhanced by the carbon storage regulator protein, CsrA. PLoS ONE 10:e0135481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wiśniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N., and Mann, M. (2009). Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359–362. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wortham, B. W., Oliveira, M. A., Fetherston, J. D., and Perry, R. D. (2010). Polyamines are required for the expression of key Hms proteins important for Yersinia pestis biofilm formation. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 2034–2047. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02219.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, R., Song, Y., Dai, Q., Kang, Y., Pan, J., Zhu, L., et al. (2017). A starvation-induced regulator, RovM, acts as a switch for planktonic/biofilm state transition in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Sci. Rep. 7:639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00534-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Koestler, B. J., Waters, C. M., and Hammer, B. K. (2013). Post-transcriptional activation of a diguanylate cyclase by quorum sensing small RNAs promotes biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 89, 989–1002. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12325

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, D., and Yang, R. (2011). Formation and regulation of Yersinia biofilms. Protein Cell 2, 173–179. doi: 10.1007/s13238-011-1024-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, W., Russell, C. W., Johnson, K. L., Mortensen, R. D., and Erickson, D. L. (2012). Gene expression analysis of Xenopsylla cheopis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) suggests a role for reactive oxygen species in response to Yersinia pestis infection. J. Med. Entomol. 49, 364–370. doi: 10.1603/ME11172

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Yersinia pseudotuberculolisis, biofilm, carbon storage regulator system A (CsrA), two-component regulation, fleas

Citation: Schachterle JK, Stewart RM, Schachterle MB, Calder JT, Kang H, Prince JT and Erickson DL (2018) Yersinia pseudotuberculosis BarA-UvrY Two-Component Regulatory System Represses Biofilms via CsrB. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 8:323. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00323

Received: 14 June 2018; Accepted: 24 August 2018;
Published: 18 September 2018.

Edited by:

Matthew S. Francis, Umeå University, Sweden

Reviewed by:

Yi-Cheng Sun, Institute of Pathogen Biology (CAMS), China
Gregory Anderson, Indiana University, Purdue University Indianapolis, United States
Nadim Majdalani, National Institutes of Health (NIH), United States

Copyright © 2018 Schachterle, Stewart, Schachterle, Calder, Kang, Prince and Erickson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: David L. Erickson, ZGF2aWRfZXJpY2tzb25AYnl1LmVkdQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.