ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol.

Sec. Cell Growth and Division

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1598736

This article is part of the Research Topic7th International Symposium on Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Peripheral Nerve Regeneration - Advances and New DirectionsView all 12 articles

Combined use of Olfactory Mucosal Mesenchymal Stem Cells Conditioned Medium and Neural Guide Conduits Promotes Nerve Regeneration in an Ovine Model

Provisionally accepted
  • 1AL4Animals, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 2Centre for the Studies of Animal Science, Institute of Agrarian and Agri-Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Oporto, Porto, Portugal
  • 3ICBAS, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • 4Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário, Gandra, Porto, Portugal
  • 5University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
  • 6Veterinary and Animal Research Center, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
  • 7Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
  • 8Center for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Marinha Grande, Leiria, Portugal
  • 9Faculty of Human Motricity, University of Lisbon, Dafundo, Portugal
  • 10University of Turin, Turin, Piedmont, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Peripheral nerve injuries remain a significant clinical challenge, particularly in severe neurotmesis injuries requiring complex therapeutic interventions to restore functionality. This study evaluated the pro-regenerative potential of combining neural guide conduits with conditioned medium from olfactory mucosa mesenchymal stem cells, compared to gold-standard surgical techniques, in a validated ovine model of common peroneal nerve injury. Recovery was assessed over 24 weeks using functional, kinematic, ultrasonographic, and electrophysiological evaluations, complemented by post-mortem nerve stereology and muscle histomorphometry. All therapeutic approaches promoted nerve and muscle regeneration, resulting in notable functional and structural improvements. However, irregularities were observed, as neural guide conduits and conditioned medium did not consistently outperform standard techniques. Additionally, recovery often fell short of normal values in the control group, highlighting the complexity of peripheral nerve regeneration in challenging surgical scenarios. These findings underscore the translational potential of biomaterials and cell conditioned mediumbased therapies while emphasizing the need for further research in complex animal models before its application in real clinical cases. Such studies are essential to refine therapeutic strategies, address observed irregularities and establish cell conditioned medium as a viable tool in peripheral nerve regeneration and repair.

Keywords: peripheral nerve injury, Peripheral nerve regeneration, Common peroneal nerve, animal model, sheep model, cell-based therapies, olfactory mucosa mesenchymal stem cells, conditioned medium

Received: 23 Mar 2025; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Alvites, Lopes, Monteiro Coelho, Sousa, Sousa, De Sousa Moreira, Rêma, Simões, Luís, Mendonça, Oliveira, Pires, Silva, João, Metafune, Bertone, Raimondo, Atayde, Alves and Maurício. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ana Colette Maurício, AL4Animals, Lisbon, Portugal

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more