
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cell Dev. Biol.
Sec. Epigenomics and Epigenetics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1572405
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Chromatin-protein interactions are fundamental for regulation of gene transcription. While ChIP-seq has long been the gold standard for mapping these interactions, emerging techniques such as CUT&RUN and CUT&Tag, which offer advantages like low-input requirements and high signal-to-noise ratios, have aroused great attention. However, research addressing the potential biases introduced by enzyme-based tagmentation approaches, and comparative assessment with ChIP-seq remain absent. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the performance of ChIP-seq, CUT&Tag, and CUT&RUN for profiling genome-wide transcription factors and histone modifications binding. Our analysis revealed that all three methods reliably detect histone modifications and transcription factors enrichment, with CUT&Tag standing out for its comparatively higher signal-to-noise ratio. Detailed peak comparison revealed unique and overlapping enrichment among the three techniques.Additionally, CUT&Tag can identify novel CTCF peaks compared with other two methods. A strong correlation was observed between CUT&Tag signal intensity and chromatin accessibility, highlighting its ability to generate high-resolution signals in accessible regions. The systematic comparison summarizes the differences between CUT&Tag and CUT&RUN in terms of signalto-noise ratio and bias towards accessible chromatin. Considering the experimental procedures, signal specificity, and inherent biases, we recommend tailoring the choice of method to the type of chromatin-protein interaction under study. CUT&Tag offers a promising alternative for applications requiring high sensitivity and reduced background noise.
Keywords: ChIP-seq, Cut&Tag, CUT&RUN, signal-to-noise, peaks, Transcription Factors, histone modification
Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 15 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Wu, Zhou, Ma, Zhang, Wang, Luo and Hua. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Weihan Luo, State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Peng Hua, State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Offspring Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.