AUTHOR=Qi Teng , Hu Yujie , Wan Junhao , Zhao Bo , Xiao Jinsuo , Liu Jie , Cheng Ye , Wu He , Lv Yonggang , Ji Fuqing TITLE=Glioma-associated oncogene homolog 1 in breast invasive carcinoma: a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis and experimental validation JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology VOLUME=12 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cell-and-developmental-biology/articles/10.3389/fcell.2024.1478478 DOI=10.3389/fcell.2024.1478478 ISSN=2296-634X ABSTRACT=Background

Breast cancer, despite significant advancements in treatment, remains a major cause of cancer-related deaths among women. Immunotherapy, an emerging therapeutic strategy, offers promise for better outcomes, particularly through the modulation of immune functions. Glioma-Associated Oncogene Homolog 1 (GLI1), a transcription factor implicated in cancer biology, has shown varying roles in different cancers. However, its immunoregulatory functions in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) remain elusive. The current study aimed to unravel the expression patterns and immune-regulatory roles of GLI1 in BRCA.

Methods

Utilizing multiple bioinformatic platforms (TIMER2.0, GEPIA2, and R packages) based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and/or Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases, we analyzed the expression of GLI1 in BRCA and its pan-cancer expression profiles. We further validated these findings by conducting qPCR and immunohistochemical staining on clinical BRCA samples. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed to assess the prognostic value of GLI1. Additionally, the association between GLI1 expression and immune infiltration within the tumor immune microenvironment (TMIE) was examined.

Results

The findings reveal dysregulated expression of GLI1 in numerous cancers, with a significant decrease observed in BRCA. High GLI1 expression indicated better survival outcomes and was correlated with the age and stage of BRCA patients. GLI1 was involved in immune status, as evidenced by its strong correlations with immune and stromal scores and the infiltration levels of multiple immune cells. Meanwhile, GLI1 was co-expressed with multiple immune-related genes, and high GLI1 expression was associated with the activation of immune-related pathways, such as binding to proteasome and mismatch repair and retinol metabolism signaling pathways. Additionally, the differential expression of GLI1 may be related to the effect of immunotherapy on CTLA-4, PD-1, and other signals, and can effectively predict the immune efficacy.

Conclusion

Our study underscores the critical role of GLI1 in BRCA, both as a potential tumor suppressor and an immune regulator. The association between GLI1 expression and favorable prognosis suggests its potential as a prognostic biomarker and immunotherapeutic target in BRCA.