Ning Chen
Sidi Li
Congrui Miao1
Jinlei Dong
Ci Li- 1Medical Science and Technology Innovation Center, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
- 2College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai, Shandong Province, China
- 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- 4Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China
Cartilage defect is one of the common tissue defect clinical diseases and may finally lead to osteoarthritis (OA) which threat patients’ physical and psychological health. Polysaccharide is the main component of extracellular matrix (ECM) in cartilage tissue. In the past decades, polysaccharide-based hydrogels have shown great potential for cartilage regeneration considering unique qualities such as biocompatibility, enhanced cell proliferation, drug delivery, low toxicity, and many others. Structures such as chain length and chain branching make polysaccharides have different physical and chemical properties. In this review, cartilage diseases and current treatment options of polysaccharide-based hydrogels for cartilage defection repair were illustrated. We focus on how components and structures of recently developed materials affect the performance. The challenges and perspectives for polysaccharide-based hydrogels in cartilage repair and regeneration were also discussed in depth.
1 Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic joint diseases today. Patients with OA often suffer from joint pain, joint stiffness, and disability of joints (Murphy et al., 2020). Unlike bone tissue, cartilage is a hierarchically organized, porous, viscoelastic tissue with a dense extracellular matrix (ECM) but has a limited intrinsic regenerative ability due to the low cell density, lack of vasculature, nervous and lymphatic systems (Abdulghani and Morouço, 2019). As for mature chondrocytes, the matrix is produced at a slow rate. In clinics, typical treatments are surgical operations including autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) and microfracture (Tsanaktsidou et al., 2022), which are characterized by low patient compliance. Therefore, it is urgent to explore useful therapeutic methods that can intervene early in the degeneration and extend the service life of articular cartilage (Wongin et al., 2021).
Biomaterials, a kind of biological material without zoonotic transmission in contact with tissues or biological fluids, have attracted considerable attention from human beings in the last few decades (Su et al., 2021). Among the numerous biomaterials, hydrogels are widely applied in tissue engineering regeneration. The three-dimensional network structure gives hydrogels the characteristic of containing huge amounts of water. Besides, the hydrogels can present different physical and biochemical characteristics because of the diversity of materials, flexible designability, and controllable crosslinking density. Many natural and/or synthetic polymers and numerous kinds of crosslinking methods have been used to design hydrogels for different biomedical applications, such as drug delivery, tissue adhesives, and space filling (Guo et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023). To give full play to the distinctive biocompatible and non-toxic nature of hydrogels, the raw materials for making hydrogels have received extensive attention. The combination of hydrogels with cells, growth factors, or artificial substrates has great potential to improve cartilage regeneration (Yuan et al., 2021).
Polysaccharide [the general formula is Cx (H2O)n] is a common biomacromolecule substance in nature. For most living organisms, polysaccharides are the most important substances for maintaining vital activities. Therefore, polysaccharide-based hydrogels have been widely applied in biomedicine and nanobiotechnology fields due to their definite advantages over synthetic polymers such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, nontoxicity, and ease of modification (Dhawan and Cui, 2022). Besides, the components, the length of molecular chains and the difference of chain branching make polysaccharides have different physical and chemical properties (Raina et al., 2022). Thanks to these unique properties, polysaccharide-based hydrogels have been widely used in cartilage repair therapy. Representative polysaccharides include hyaluronic acid, alginate, chitosan, and chondroitin sulfate.
In this review, we focus on summarizing the latest progress in cartilage defects and the recent advances of polysaccharide-based biomaterials in cartilage regeneration. Firstly, the biological features of OA and cartilage regeneration are discussed. And then, the present therapeutic strategies for cartilage regeneration are shown in the review. Finally, the developments of designing various polysaccharide-based hydrogels for cartilage defection therapy are revealed.
2 The biological characteristics of OA and cartilage regeneration
Except for “wear and tear” of the joint, the inflammatory and metabolic factors are thought to be important causes of joint stiffness, swelling and loss of mobility. The progression of OA affects the entire joint tissue. OA develops from the breakdown of the cartilage matrix. After the degenerative ECM becomes fibrillation and erosion, the collagen fragments activate the inflammation of synovitis that induces further cartilage degradation. Besides, joint ligaments and subchondral bone also participate in the inflammatory response. The most notable for the pathogenesis of OA is the cartilage injury. In physical factors, continuous load-bearing and friction will thin the cartilage. The aging procession including DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and autophagy limits the capacity of self-renewal of chondrocytes. The production of metalloproteases, synovial angiogenesis, and inflammatory cytokines, which accelerate cartilage destruction (Martel-Pelletier et al., 2016; Xia et al., 2014) (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Osteoarthritis risk factors. Various risk factors for healthy joints to degenerate into osteoarthritis. Partially designed with BioRender.
Chondrocytes are specific cells in cartilage tissue (3%–5% of articular cartilage tissue) that are present in high-density extracellular matrix (ECM) (Heinegård and Saxne, 2011). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are involved in the formation and differentiation of chondrocytes. In mature cartilage tissues, stem cells generally gather in the deep layer of perichondrium and have the potential to differentiate into chondrocytes again (Xiang et al., 2022). In addition to the chondrocytes and MSCs, the ECM also are the indispensable composition of the organization of cartilage tissue. The ECM provides a suitable microenvironment for the proliferation, differentiation and maintenance of physiological activities of various cells in cartilage tissue (Benders et al., 2013). The ECM of cartilage tissue is a unique tissue-specific 3D environment composed of multiple types of collagens and proteoglycans. The ECM of cartilage tissue is a unique tissue-specific 3D environment composed of multiple types of collagen and glycans. Fibrous collagen forms the network structure of the ECM and contains a variety of bioactive factors, such as growth factors, integrins and functional peptides. ECM provides load bearing, joint lubrication and joint connection for cartilage tissue. And in addition to fibrous collagen, the network structure of ECM also contains glycoglycans, such as aggregin, keratin sulfate glycosaminoglycans, hyaluronic acid, chondroitin fate glycosaminoglycans and glycoprotein lubricant (PRG4). These unique proteins and bioactive factors can respond to external dynamic events and form intricate interactions between cells (Bhattacharjee et al., 2015) Therefore, resorting to cartilage tissue elements is a promising approach to promote cartilage injury recovery.
3 Therapeutic strategies for promoting cartilage regeneration
3.1 The types of bioactive factors
After cartilage tissue injury, it is difficult to achieve satisfactory healing only by the repair of injured marginal tissue, and additional biochemical and mechanical signals are needed to stimulate cells into the regeneration process (Liu Y. et al., 2022). In this review, the several bioactive factors or drugs that assist cartilage regeneration, and the recent studies related to enhancing cartilage regeneration tissue were summarized (Table 1).
Table 1. The bioactive factors or drugs to assist cartilage regeneration.
3.2 The current methods for controllable release
Methods to prolong the usage time of articular cartilage include oral or intra- articular injection of drugs, but they may face significant obstacles in terms of persistence of effect and medical compliance. However, remarkable achievements will be made in cartilage injury repair and joint function recovery, if chondrocytes and MSCs can be scientifically and effectively induced to regenerate and differentiate. With the development of tissue engineering research, biomaterials have become an important application point to support cartilage regeneration due to their excellent biocompatibility, degradability, and controllable mechanical strength (Makris et al., 2015; Mokhtarinia and Masaeli, 2023; Zhou et al., 2022).
4 Polysaccharide-based hydrogels
4.1 Design of polysaccharide-based materials
To mimic the structure of cartilage tissue and physicochemical properties of the ECM as well as possible, several parameters of the hydrogels should be considered: 1) good biocompatibility; 2) adequate mechanical properties; 3) various chemical modifiability; 4) promoting cell adhesion; 5) biological functionality, integration with defect site; 6) sufficient porosity and pore interconnectivity to allow cell-mediated matrix deposition and angiogenesis (Fu et al., 2021; Ghanbari et al., 2021a; Hiew et al., 2018). Polysaccharide based hydrogels are ideal candidates for constructing bionic extracellular matrix (ECM) because of their bionic network, high water content, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. Nowadays, the main polysaccharide materials, which were used to construct hydrogel scaffolds, 149 include hyaluronic acid (HA), alginate, chitosan, and chondroitin sulfate Polysaccharide-based hydrogels can be loaded with bioactive molecules, growth factors, exosomes, or cells, to further enhance cartilage regeneration. These bioactive agents could promote chondrogenesis, inhibit inflammation, or stimulate angiogenesis, depending on the specific requirements of the cartilage repair process. In the following section, the features, limitations, and modification strategies of each kind of polysaccharide were introduced.
4.1.1 Hyaluronic acid
HA, widely distributed in the soft tissues, is an anionic polysaccharide playing crucial roles in cell transduction and matrix formation. HA possesses special biological actives for fabricating hydrogel scaffolds interaction with cells as follows. 1) Joint lubrication: the combination of HA derivatives with cartilage tissue precisely mimics the lubrication and viscoelastic functions of lubricating proteins on the surface of cartilage, playing a protective role in joints (Singh et al., 2014). 2) Anti-inflammatory effect: It was found that the scaffold surface modified by HA derivatives could inhibit the aggregation of inflammatory cells at the lesion site, and reduce the release and activity of pro- inflammatory factors and mediators by suppressing the interaction between inflammatory key receptor and their ligands on the cell membrane (Knopf-Marques et al., 2016). 3) Cartilage regeneration: HA also could interact with MSCs via cell surface receptors including CD44, ICAM-1 and RHAMM, and is benefit for accumulating substantia cartilaginous matrix (Chung and Burdick, 2009; Nettles et al., 2004). HA is involved in cell proliferation, morphogenesis, inflammation, and wound repair and is an ideal choice for manufacture of chondrocyte carrier materials in cartilage regeneration.
The linear structure of HA is shown in Figure 2. HA possesses a large number of hydrophilic active functional groups, such as free hydroxyl, carboxyl and acetylamino groups, which are readily modified with sulfhydryl group and allyl group (Campoccia et al., 1998; Wang M. et al., 2022). These characteristics make HA a desirable candidate for designing carrier materials loaded with cells, drugs or other active factors. Typically, thiol-modified hyaluronic acid, collectively named HA-SH, was prepared by carbodiimide-mediated hydrazide chemistry and then crosslinked with vinyl sulfonated triblock copolymer to form hydrogels by Michael addition (Censi et al., 2020). Given the diverse modifiability of HA, increasing studies adopted HA and HA derivatives as the matrix materials in the upper or lower layers to synthesize biphasic scaffolds (Liu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). For instance, HA hydrogels of different physicochemical and biological properties can be infused into the 3D scaffold to form a bilayer scaffold, realizing the repair of osteochondral defects with different structures (Chen et al., 2022). The dynamic HA layer exhibited favorable stress relaxation due to the cross-linking kinetics of HA hydrazone for cartilage regeneration and the porous HA layer provided mechanical support, maintained long-term mechanical stability and promoted cell adhesion and proliferation for subchondral bone repair.
Figure 2. The structure of HA.
Considering the unique rigid cylindrical spiral shape of HA spatial structure, HA hydrogels have special physical and chemical properties, such as good hydrophilicity, strong water absorption and retention, high biocompatibility, biodegradability, viscoelasticity, printing flexible (Yin et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2018). HA hydrogels with high viscosity play the essential role in protecting articular cartilage surface from shear stress. However, the chief shortcomings of HA alone to construct hydrogels are the poor mechanical properties and fast biodegradability, which finally lead to the unsustainable cartilage tissue repair. To solve these problems, many efforts have been devoted to improve mechanical strength and viscoelasticity, and resistance to rapid degradation nowadays.
Methacrylated hyaluronic acid (HAMA) is a typical example of a modified HA to present increased rigidity and higher resistance to degradation (Burdick et al., 2005; Poldervaart et al., 2017). With a photo initiator, different concentrations and molecular weights of HAMA can be crosslinked and form hydrogels under UV irradiation. The results showed that the compressive moduli of 50 kDa 20 wt% HAMA was about kPa, which was much higher than that of 50 kDa 2 wt% HAMA (∼12 kPa). Besides, the complete degradation time of 10 wt% of MAHA hydrogel with 50% uronic acid was almost 20 days, but that of 5wt% of MAHA hydrogel with 40% uronic acid was less than 2 days.
Introducing nanoparticles or reinforcing materials could enhance the mechanical properties of HA based hydrogels. It has been reported that pluronic F127 diacrylate (F127DA) nano-micelles with sizes of 10–20 nm serve as the macro-crosslinkers were added to improve the mechanical performance of hyaluronate hydrogels under photo-polymerization (Ren et al., 2019). Besides, graphene (GR) also could present strength mechanical strength of scaffolds. Compared with TPE-PEEP/HA hydrogel, POSS-PEEP/HA presented higher sheer modulus, compressive modulus, and tensile modulus. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS), a kind of rigid inorganic nanocage, also allowed for improving mechanical strength. For another example, an injectable, biodegradable and mechanically reinforced POSS-PEEP/HA hybrid hydrogel scaffold based on polysaccharide HA was synthesized for cartilage regeneration (Cui et al., 2023). Briefly, the hydrogel was synthesized by Michael addition reaction using POSS-8PEEP-AC as core and HA-SH as crosslinker. Compared with pure TPE-8PEEP/HA hydrogel, POSS- 8PEEP/HA hydrogel presented favorable compressibility and fatigue resistance in the cyclic compression experiment and repeated bending properties (Figure 3). Those improved mechanical properties can be ascribed to that the component of POSS could restrict the movement of molecular chains, whose structure is rigid 3D inorganic silica nanocage. And the high survival rate of hMSCs encapsulated in POSS-8PEEP/HA hydrogel shows that POSS-8PEEP/HA hydrogel system has good biocompatibility and provides a 3D platform for cartilage cell adhesion and proliferation. Finally, hMSCs- laden hydrogels were administrated to cartilage defect-induced rats model and effectively promoted cartilage regeneration in vivo. Besides, large amounts of studies improve the mechanical properties by constructing double network (DN) hydrogel. DN network consisting of two asymmetric networks such as chemical bond and reversible noncovalent bond. For instance, Cai et al. (2022) synthesized the DN hydrogel based on HA and gellan gum (GG). The first chemical crosslinking network was formed by HA-furan derivatives and 4-arm- maleimido-poly (ethylene glycol) and then GG crosslinked by Ca2+ was used as the second ionic crosslinking network to improve the compressive strength and fatigue resistance.
Figure 3. The mechanical strength of POSS-PEEP/HA. (A) Compressive modulus of POSS-PEEP/HA and TPE-PEEP/HA hydrogels. (B) Recovery cyclic tests from 50% to 0%. Copyright from ACS publications. (Reprinted with permission from Cui et al., 2023. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society).
4.1.2 Alginate
Alginate is a natural linear polysaccharide extracted from brown algae, bacteria or kelp, consisting of repeating units of β-1,4-linked D-mannuronic acid (M) and L guluronic acid (G) linked by 1,4-glycosidic bond. Alginate is a copolymer was consisted of a certain proportion of GM, MM, and GG. The number and structure of M and G is different depending on the sources, which would influence the physical and chemical properties. Typically, M segment has better biocompatibility, while G could provide higher rigidity. Therefore, the alginate gel rich in G units has fewer elastic chain segments and higher hardness. Increasing the content of G segment can improve mechanical properties and compressive modulus, making it suitable for repairing cartilage tissue (Liu W. et al., 2022; Zhang and Zhao, 2020).
One of the key advantages of alginate hydrogels is excellent biocompatibility, especially for the hydrogel rich in G segment, which allows for cell encapsulation and proliferation within the hydrogel matrix. Chondrocytes, the specialized cells found in cartilage, can be encapsulated in the alginate hydrogel and cultured to promote cartilage regeneration (Rastogi and Kandasubramanian, 2019). The hydrogel provides a supportive environment for cell growth, nutrient exchange, and extracellular matrix production. Furthermore, alginate hydrogels have the advantage of being injectable, allowing for minimally invasive delivery into cartilage defects or joint spaces. This injectability enables precise placement and full coverage of the damaged tissue, facilitating the regeneration process. Besides, the alginate hydrogels could also be used as 3D biological ink to compensate for cartilage defects (Liu W. et al., 2022).
However, the disadvantage of alginate hydrogels also limits its application in clinic. On the one hand, inherent adhesive performance that may be necessary for long-term integration with surrounding tissue are weak. On other hand, the sodium alginate scaffold cannot provide sufficient and effective mechanical support in pressure environments.
The porous hybrid hydrogels were synthesized by both ionic crosslink network from calcium-alginate non covalent bonding and covalent crosslink network from methacrylate radical polymerization (Stagnaro et al., 2018). The results indicated that the mechanical properties of hybrid EGDMA/HEMA hydrogel (G modulus approached 250 kPa) were much higher than that of alginate hydrogel alone (about 35 kPa). Besides, the characteristic of the double network hydrogels is easy to operate when the first network formed, such as injectability and printability, and the mechanical strength and structural stability of the hydrogel enhanced when the second crosslinking network formed (Asohan et al., 2022). A strategy named confined-chain-aggregation (CCA) was adopted to fabricate ultrastrong and tough hydrogels based on the double network (Xu C. Z. et al., 2021). After the first crosslinked network of polyacrylamide (PAAM) is formed, both the alginate chains and PAAM chains were restricted and the micron-scale aggregates were generated by solvent- induced phase separation. Before ionic crosslinking of alginate. After absorbing water, large-scale cross-linked regions were formed by hydrogen bonding and metal coordination. The results indicated the mechanical strength and toughness of PAAM/Alg hydrogel was five times higher than that of traditional methods, because of the combination of CCA and cationic crosslinking.
Introducing reinforcing agents is also a major method to enhance mechanical properties. The injectable and biodegradable hydrogels based on oxidized alginate/gelatin and nitrogen doped carbon dots (NCDs) has been designed as the reinforcing agent (Ghanbari et al., 2021a). Besides, the study also investigated that oxidized alginate based nanocomposite hydrogels containing high ZrO2 NP content (1.5%) as reinforcements had higher mechanical properties than those without NP (Figure 4A) (Ghanbari et al., 2021b).
Figure 4. The mechanical strength and the cartilage repair performance of alginate based hydrogels. (A) Modulus of hydrogels with different amounts of ZrO2. (Reprinted from Ghanbari et al., 2021b, with permission from Elsevier). (B) H&E and M-S histochemical staining images of the regeneration tissues. (Reprinted from Xing et al., 2021, with permission from Elsevier). (C) Representative immunofluorescence staining images of CD68 and CD29 (red), CD206 and CD90. (green), and DAPI (blue) in tissue samples collected from the wounds treated with different hydrogels at week 4 after surgery. (Reprinted from Ma et al., 2022, with permission from Wiley). (D) Diagram of interaction between tissue residues and the functional groups of AD/CE/RSF hydrogel. (Reprinted from Zhang F. X. et al., 2021, with permission from Elsevier). (E) Images of the stretched hydrogel between the fingers. (F) The hydrogel on glass in underwater conditions. (Reprinted from Zhang F. X. et al., 2021, with permission from Elsevier). (G) Adhesion strength of hydrogels with different time. (Reprinted from Zhang F. X. et al., 2021, with permission from Elsevier).
Osteochondral injury is the focal damaged area of both cartilage and an underlying bone fragment. A single performance scaffolds hardly meet the needs of two types of defect areas simultaneously. The bilayer scaffolds could mimic the structure of cartilage and osteochondral bone. In detail, gum and sodium alginate serve as the cartilage layer, while gum and hydroxyapatite serve as the subchondral layer (Xing et al., 2021). This integrated construct is compatibility and can be loaded together with MSCs, which are associated with the expression of different functional proteins involved in cartilage and bone formation. In the rabbit osteochondral defect model, the hydrogel was used as calcium reservoir to promote angiogenesis and critical defect repair within 8 weeks (Figure 4B).
In addition, introducing adhesive polymers (such as hyaluronic acid and dopamine) can also compensate for the insufficient cell adhesion ability of alginate (Figure 4C) (Ma et al., 2022). Zhang F. X. et al. (2021) fabricated the injectable mussel-inspired highly adhesive hydrogel (AS/CS/RSF) with the crosslinking network of alginate-dopamine, chondroitin sulfate, and regenerated silk fibroin. Due to the nature of the chemical functional residues of AS/CS/RSF hydrogels, such as dopamine, CS-NHS, RSF tyrosine, amino groups and carboxyl groups, there are multiple noncovalent interactions and covalent bonds (Figure 4D). The sulfhydryl and amine groups existing on the surface of these extracellular matrix (ECM) react with NHS, and catecholamine and phenolic hydroxyl groups on the hydrogel to form a covalent cross-linking network, which helps the adhesion of hydrogels. AD/CS/RSF hydrogel provides 120 kPa relative lap shear strength and higher ability to maintain adhesive strength than the commercial tissue adhesive (Figures 4E–G).
4.1.3 Chitosan
Chitosan is a product of N-deacetylation of chitin, which widely exisits in the shell of crustaceans, like shrimp, exoskeletons of mollusk’s and in the cell walls of fungi (Zhou et al., 2008). It is a natural polysaccharide and composed of N-acetylglucosamine and the linear chain of D-glucosamine units through β-glycosidic bond connected together (Figure 5). The amino group in the molecular structure of chitosan is more reactive than the acetylamino group in chitin, which makes the polysaccharide have excellent biological functions and can be chemically modified, including acylation, alkylation, 315 carboxymethylation and carboxyalkylation (Bhattarai et al., 2010). Besides, positively charged chitosan can be bind with negatively charged glycosaminoglycans secreted by chondrocytes to form ion complexes that fix them on the scaffold (Man et al., 2016). Therefore, chitosan-based hydrogel has numerous physiological functions, making it attractive for cartilage repair and regeneration such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, non-toxic, natural broad- spectrum antimicrobial activity, high bio-adhesive, and anti-inflammatory. Composite chitosan-based biomaterials have been demonstrated to stimulate in vivo regeneration and the repair of cartilage (Kapat et al., 2019). Therefore, chitosan is considered as a functional biomaterial with great application prospects.
Figure 5. The structure of chitosan. x represents the number of repeating units of glucosamine, y represents the number of repeating units of acetylglucosamine.
Although chitosan has shown the ability to promote chondrocyte proliferation, maintain normal chondrocyte phenotype, and induce adipose derived stem cells (hASCs) to differentiate into chondrocytes in vivo and in vitro (Asgarpour et al., 2021), the conventional chitosan-based hydrogels generated from an acidic solvent yield exhibit weak mechanical properties and low stability (Fang et al., 2022). Introducing reinforcing material is an option to improve its properties for wider applications. For instance, CNCs as nanofillers were introduced into CS/pectin hydrogel to enhance the mechanical properties. With the increase of the content of CNCs, the network structure of the composite hydrogels was more compact and the equilibrium swelling ratio decreased. The storage modulus (G ′) of hydrogels with high content of AD CNCs (0.5 wt% CNCs) presented 2.5–3 times higher than that of the hydrogel without CNCs (Ghorbani et al., 2020).
In addition, chitosan lacks integration with the host bone, which becomes a major challenge in repairing subchondral defects. Recently, chitosan-based fiber scaffolds are obtained by electrospinning as a scaffold for chondrocyte growth. Compared with thin films, higher ratio of living chondrocyte on fibers within the first 8 h after inoculation indicated that the morphology of the matrix is a key impact on the interaction between cells and scaffolds (Garcia et al., 2021).
4.1.4 Chondroitin sulfate
Chondroitin sulfate, composed of D-glucuronic acid and N-acetyl-D-galactamine units (Figure 6), is the glycosaminoglycan extracted from the extracellular matrix of animal tissues such as connective tissue, bones, ligaments, tendons, and cartilage. Chondroitin sulfate based hydrogels are widely used as tissue engineering scaffolds because of their good biocompatibility, biodegradability and similar structure to natural cartilage ECM (Wang and Yang, 2017). Chondroitin sulfate contains a large number of hydroxyl, carboxyl, and sulfonic groups, which endows them with excellent hydrophilicity and chemically modify (Zhang Q. et al., 2021). Besides, chondroitin sulfate, as a natural polymer, has anti-inflammatory activity and can effectively promote the synthesis of proteoglycans and hyaluronic acid, reduce the metabolic activity of chondrocytes, enhance the specific gene expression of chondrocytes, and inhibit the synthesis of proteolytic enzymes (Gao et al., 2018) It is very beneficial for reducing symptoms of osteoarthritis. Chondroitin sulfate has the ability to enhance the secretion of proteoglycans and collage. This endows it with the potential to treat cartilage tissue defects in clinic. The interpenetrating network hydrogel with chondroitin sulfate, gelatin and HA as the main components was prepared by click chemical method (Yu et al., 2013). Hyaluronic acid and gelatin were respectively modified using furan methylamine and furan formic acid, and then were mixed with maleimide polyethylene glycol (MAL-PEG-MAL) to generate the first network by Diels-Alder reaction. Finally, the secondary network was formed after adding chondroitin sulfate. Because neither additional organic crosslinking agent nor catalyst was required, the hydrogel is non-toxic and harmless. It is an effective method to prepare cartilage tissue engineering scaffolds.
Figure 6. The structure of chondroitin sulfate.
4.2 Technologies for synthesizing hydrogels
There is an increasing demand for fabricating new technologies and good outcomes to satisfy irregularly shaped cartilage defects. The methods are listed as follows in Table 2.
Table 2. The methods of synthesizing hydrogel scaffolds.
4.2.1 Injectable technology
Given the irregular shape of the cartilage defect site, the injectable hydrogel has obtained great attention in the surgery, especially for minimally invasive surgery. The hydrogel scaffolds could be implanted into the cartilage defection by a simple and minimally invasive injection instead of the complex traditional treatment methods, such as microfractures, autologous chondrocyte transplantation, and allogeneic bone cartilage transplantation. The self-healing hydrogels can be best characterized when referring to their ability to return to their primary shape after any mechanical manipulations adapted shape and in situ cross-linking capability (Wang P. H. et al., 2022). It also acts as a scaffold for cellular infiltration and promotes the natural healing process (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Cells loaded hydrogels are injected into cartilage defection. Partially designed with BioRender.
A large number of polysaccharide materials, such as sodium alginate, chitosan and HA, are often used as ideal substances for injectable hydrogel by physical crosslinking and chemical crosslinking (Xiao et al., 2023; Zhu et al., 2017). The hydrogels combined with nanoparticles, exosomes and cells showed good reversibility under environmental stimuli and improved compliance of patients with cartilage injury (Zhang F. X. et al., 2021; Atoufi et al., 2019). Therefore, many hydrogels are responsive to environmental stimuli, that is, when the hydrogel is stimulated by light, temperature, and other environmental factors, its internal structure will undergo reversible changes, which will lead to changes in shape, permeability, and mechanical properties (Fallahi et al., 2022; Li X. et al., 2021; Weizel et al., 2020).
4.2.2 3D bioprinting technology
Compared with the uncontrollable injectable hydrogel directly injected into the cartilage defect site, 3D printing technology has unique performances in loading cells, exosomes and other active substances onto the hydrogel scaffold materials through layer-by-layer printing (Figure 8), so as to accurately treat the cartilage defect damage (Lee et al., 2020). It offers an exciting opportunity to fabricate biological constructs with specific geometries, clinically relevant sizes and functions for biomedical application. A limited number of carbohydrate polymer materials, including alginate, chitosan, and chondroitin sulfate could be designed as bio-ink for 3D scaffolds given the mechanical stability, viscoelastic behavior, printability, shape fidelity and structural integrity (Kim et al., 2018; Mihajlovic et al., 2022; Yang X. C. et al., 2018). The viscoelastic properties of sodium alginate and dECM alone could not meet the need for printability. TOCN was introduced into the combination to remarkably improve the viscosity and dECM/TOCN/alginate hydrogel scaffold based on SA by 3D printing technology (Zhe et al., 2023). On the one hand, the two-step crosslinking process could effectively improve the printability and mechanical strength. On the other hand, dECM and TOCN could provide the nutrient supply for cell proliferation and promote chondrogenesis.
Figure 8. The scheme of 3D bioprinting process. The bioink solution was synthesized by GelMA, GMHA and cells, and then was printed on a 24-well culture plate with a nozzle of 0.25 mm (25 G) using a 3D Discovery Instrument. (Reprinted from Lee et al., 2020, with permission from Elsevier).
4.2.3 Microfluidic technology
Microfluidic is a kind of technology that could operate the fluid in the micrometer-sized chips to complete the processes, like material synthesis and reagent analysis. At present, there are many researches on the synthesis of cartilage regeneration using microfluidic devices (Saygili et al., 2021; Yao et al., 2023). Alginate particles with a controlled size range of 178–375 μm were synthesized based on the droplet microfluidic technique (Figure 9). In detail, the alginate droplet size was freely controlled in a microfluidic chip by changing the fluid conditions of alginate and oil, and then the alginate droplet gelated in the presence of calcium ions. Alginate based hydrogel loaded with transforming growth factor β3 (TGF-β3) can effectively induce chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells (Trinh et al., 2021).
Figure 9. Schematic of synthesizing alginate microparticles in the microdevice. The mineral oil solution divides the sodium alginate solution into microsphere droplets at the 1st junction. And then the microsphere droplets are mixed with the calcium chloride solution at the 2nd junction, where CaCl2 solution crosslinks with sodium alginate to form sodium alginate microparticle. (Reprinted from Trinh et al., 2021, with permission from Elsevier).
4.3 The adhesion of hydrogels for cartilage regeneration
The good and stable integration between hydrogel implants and host tissue is crucial for cartilage scaffolds. Due to the weak adhesion of hydrogels to wet tissues, designing and manufacturing hydrogels with high adhesive strength remains a significant challenge in existing hydrogel technology for enhancing the regenerative capacity of cartilage defects. The physical and biochemical structures of natural polysaccharides almost fail to meet the high adhesion requirements of tissue engineering scaffolds. Utilizing their inherent properties, many innovative methods, including chemical, physical, or combined modifications, have been employed to improve their performance. For example, alginate sulfate-tyramine (ASTA) hydrogels with dual modifications of sulfation and tyraminization exhibit strong adhesion to cartilage tissue and have higher bonding strength compared to alginate-tyramine (AlgTA). Moreover, the expression of chondrogenic markers such as aggrecan and Sox9 genes in ASTA hydrogels is significantly higher than in AlgTA (Wang et al., 2014).
5 Conclusions and perspectives
Cartilage regeneration is a complex physiological process. The regeneration of cartilage tissue is not only dependent on the use of drugs, but also its biomechanical changes, cell adhesion growth, induction of chondrocyte differentiation, and regulation of the ECM microenvironment. In this review, polysaccharide-based hydrogels with different structures showing the various properties and functions in the process of cartilage regeneration were elaborated in detail. The discrepancies in molecules binding to polysaccharide-based hydrogels and the properties of hydrogels are responsible for the different efficiency in promoting the regeneration process of cartilage. It provides help and enlightenment for the preparation and application of polysaccharide-based hydrogels. Precisely mimicking the complex structure and composition of natural cartilage, with a greater focus on the interactions between cells, to promote better regeneration of cartilage tissue, is a consideration and development direction for future cartilage regeneration and repair. In addition to the mechanical performance, cell adhesion performance, and biocompatibility, efforts to improve the wet adhesion of hydrogels may also be considered for future cartilage defect repair.
Developing advanced technologies to synthesize polysaccharide-based hydrogels is essential and another aspect of future research. Considering the irregular shape of the cartilage defect site, injectable hydrogels are ideal candidates. And 3D printing technology and microfluidic technology have received increasing attention in the field. However, the hydrogel scaffold could not respond to stimuli similar to the body with the changes in the external environment, which is still the limitation of current research. 4D printing technology might be a direction for future development. It can not only customize the shape of materials on a personalized basis but also respond according to the characteristics of the physiological environment.
Besides, it is a huge challenge to clinical from laboratory. Therefore, it is necessary to further improve the preclinical trials to understand the metabolic and inflammatory processes of polysaccharide-based hydrogels in vivo as much as possible and to better understand the effects of carbohydrate hydrogels on cartilage regeneration processes.
Author contributions
NC: Writing–review and editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing–original draft. SL: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing–original draft. CM: Data curation, Writing–original draft, Methodology. QZ: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing–original draft. JD: Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing–original draft. LL: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. CL: Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The work was supported by the Shandong Province Major Scientific and Technical Innovation Project (No. 2021SFGC0502), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2023QH298, ZR2023QE231).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abdulghani, S., and Morouço, P. G. (2019). Biofabrication for osteochondral tissue regeneration: bioink printability requirements. J. Mater. Science-Materials Med. 30 (2), 20. doi:10.1007/s10856-019-6218-x
Abe, K., and Tsumaki, N. (2023). Regeneration of joint surface defects by transplantation of allogeneic cartilage: application of iPS cell-derived cartilage and immunogenicity. Inflamm. Regen. 43 (1), 56. doi:10.1186/s41232-023-00307-0
Asgarpour, R., Masaeli, E., and Kermani, S. (2021). Development of meniscus-inspired 3D-printed PCL scaffolds engineered with chitosan/extracellular matrix hydrogel. Polym. Adv. Technol. 32 (12), 4721–4732. doi:10.1002/pat.5465
Asohan, A. W., Hashim, R., Ku Ishak, K. M., Abdul Hamid, Z. A., Jasme, N., and Bustami, Y. (2022). Preparation and characterisation of cellulose nanocrystal/alginate/polyethylene glycol diacrylate (CNC/Alg/PEGDA) hydrogel using double network crosslinking technique for bioprinting application. Appl. Sciences-Basel 12 (2), 771. doi:10.3390/app12020771
Atoufi, Z., Kamrava, S. K., Davachi, S. M., Hassanabadi, M., Saeedi Garakani, S., Alizadeh, R., et al. (2019). Injectable PNIPAM/Hyaluronic acid hydrogels containing multipurpose modified particles for cartilage tissue engineering: synthesis, characterization, drug release and cell culture study. Int. J. Biol. 31 Macromol. 139, 1168–1181. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.101
Bannuru, R. R., Osani, M. C., Vaysbrot, E. E., Arden, N. K., Bennell, K., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A., et al. (2019). OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 27 (11), 1578–1589. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011
Beigi, M. H., Atefi, A., Ghanaei, H. R., Labbaf, S., Ejeian, F., and Nasr-Esfahani, M. H. (2018). Activated platelet-rich plasma improves cartilage regeneration using adipose stem cells encapsulated in a 3D alginate scaffold. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 12 (6), 1327–1338. doi:10.1002/term.2663
Benders, K. E. M., van Weeren, P. R., Badylak, S. F., Saris, D. B. F., Dhert, W. J. A., and Malda, J. (2013). Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration. Trends Biotechnol. 31 (3), 169–176. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.004
Bhattacharjee, M., Coburn, J., Centola, M., Murab, S., Barbero, A., Kaplan, D. L., et al. (2015). Tissue engineering strategies to study cartilage development, degeneration and regeneration. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 84, 107–122. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.08.010
Bhattarai, N., Gunn, J., and Zhang, M. Q. (2010). Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localized drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62 (1), 83–99. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.019
Burdick, J. A., Chung, C., Jia, X. Q., Randolph, M. A., and Langer, R. (2005). Controlled degradation and mechanical behavior of photopolymerized hyaluronic acid networks. Biomacromolecules 6 (1), 386–391. doi:10.1021/bm049508a
Cai, Z. X., Tang, Y. M., Wei, Y., Wang, P., and Zhang, H. (2022). Double - network hydrogel based on exopolysaccharides as a biomimetic extracellular matrix to augment articular cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 152, 124–143. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.062
Campoccia, D., Doherty, P., Radice, M., Brun, P., Abatangelo, G., and Williams, D. F. (1998). Semisynthetic resorbable materials from hyaluronan esterification. Biomaterials 19 (23), 2101–2127. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(98)00042-8
Censi, R., Casadidio, C., Deng, S. Y., Gigliobianco, M. R., Sabbieti, M. G., Agas, D., et al. (2020). Interpenetrating hydrogel networks enhance mechanical stability, rheological properties, release behavior and adhesiveness of platelet-rich plasma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (4), 1399. doi:10.3390/ijms21041399
Chen, X. F., Jiang, C. Y., Wang, T., Zhu, T., Li, X., and Huang, J. (2022). Hyaluronic acid-based biphasic scaffold with layer-specific induction capacity for osteochondral defect regeneration. Mater. and Des. 216, 110550. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110550
Chen, Z., Xiao, H., Zhang, H., Xin, Q., Zhang, H., Liu, H., et al. (2021). Heterogenous hydrogel mimicking the osteochondral ECM applied to tissue regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. B 9 (41), 8646–8658. doi:10.1039/d1tb00518a
Chung, C., and Burdick, J. A. (2009). Influence of three-dimensional hyaluronic acid microenvironments on mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis. Tissue Eng. Part A 15 (2), 243–254. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0067
Cui, L. S., Yang, Z., Hong, J., Zhu, Z., Wang, Z., Liu, Z., et al. (2023). Injectable and degradable POSS-Polyphosphate-Polysaccharide hybrid hydrogel scaffold for cartilage regeneration. Acs Appl. Mater. and Interfaces 15 (17), 20625–20637. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c22947
Dhawan, V., and Cui, X. T. (2022). Carbohydrate based biomaterials for neural interface applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 10 (25), 4714–4740. doi:10.1039/d2tb00584k
Fallahi, H., Daemi, H., Bagheri, F., and Baghaban Eslaminejad, M. (2022). A supramolecular injectable hydrogel based on β-cyclodextrin-grafted alginate and pluronic-amine loaded with kartogenin for chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed. Mater. 17 (6), 065002. doi:10.1088/1748-605x/ac8bbd
Fang, J., Liao, J. C., Zhong, C. X., Lu, X., and Ren, F. (2022). High-strength, biomimetic functional chitosan-based hydrogels for full-thickness osteochondral defect repair. Acs Biomaterials Sci. and Eng. 8 (10), 4449–4461. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00187
Fu, Y., Zoetebier, B., Both, S., Dijkstra, P. J., and Karperien, M. (2021). Engineering of optimized hydrogel formulations for cartilage repair. Polymers 13 (9), 1526. doi:10.3390/polym13091526
Gao, Y. L., Li, B., Kong, W. L., Yuan, L., Guo, L., Li, C., et al. (2018). Injectable and self-crosslinkable hydrogels based on collagen type II and activated chondroitin sulfate for cell delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 118, 2014–2020. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.079
Garcia, C. E. G., Lardy, B., Bossard, F., Soltero Martínez, F. A., and Rinaudo, M. (2021). Chitosan based biomaterials for cartilage tissue engineering: chondrocyte adhesion and proliferation. Food Hydrocoll. Health 1, 100018. doi:10.1016/j.fhfh.2021.100018
Ghanbari, M., Salavati-Niasari, M., and Mohandes, F. (2021a). Thermosensitive alginate-gelatin-nitrogen- doped carbon dots scaffolds as potential injectable hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Rsc Adv. 11 (30), 18423–18431. doi:10.1039/d1ra01496j
Ghanbari, M., Salavati-Niasari, M., Mohandes, F., Firouzi, Z., and Mousavi, S. D. (2021b). The impact of zirconium oxide nanoparticles content on alginate dialdehyde-gelatin scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering. J. Mol. Liq. 335, 116531. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116531
Ghorbani, M., Roshangar, L., and Rad, J. S. (2020). Development of reinforced chitosan/pectin scaffold by using the cellulose nanocrystals as nanofillers: an injectable hydrogel for tissue engineering. Eur. Polym. J. 130, 109697. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109697
Guo, C., Cao, Z. X., Peng, Y., Wu, R., Xu, H., Yuan, Z., et al. (2022). Subchondral bone-inspired hydrogel scaffold for cartilage regeneration. Colloids Surfaces B-Biointerfaces 218, 112721. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112721
Heinegård, D., and Saxne, T. (2011). The role of the cartilage matrix in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 7 (1), 50–56. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2010.198
Hiew, V. V., Simat, S. F. B., and Teoh, P. L. (2018). The advancement of biomaterials in regulating stem cell fate. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 14 (1), 43–57. doi:10.1007/s12015-017-9764-y
Hu, H. X., Dong, L. L., Bu, Z. H., Shen, Y., Luo, J., Zhang, H., et al. (2020). miR-23a-3p-abundant small extracellular vesicles released from Gelma/nanoclay hydrogel for cartilage regeneration. J. Extracell. Vesicles 9 (1), 1778883. doi:10.1080/20013078.2020.1778883
Kapat, K., Rameshbabu, A. P., Maity, P. P., Mandal, A., Bankoti, K., Dutta, J., et al. (2019). Osteochondral defects healing using extracellular matrix mimetic phosphate/sulfate decorated GAGs-Agarose gel and quantitative Micro-CT evaluation. Acs Biomaterials Sci. and Eng. 5 (1), 149–164. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00253
Karnik, R., Gu, F., Basto, P., Cannizzaro, C., Dean, L., Kyei-Manu, W., et al. (2008). Microfluidic platform for controlled synthesis of polymeric nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 8 (9), 2906–2912. doi:10.1021/nl801736q
Kim, S. H., Yeon, Y. K., Lee, J. M., Chao, J. R., Lee, Y. J., Seo, Y. B., et al. (2018). Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat. Commun. 9, 1620. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y
Knopf-Marques, H., Pravda, M., Wolfova, L., Velebny, V., Schaaf, P., Vrana, N. E., et al. (2016). Hyaluronic acid and its derivatives in coating and delivery systems: applications in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and immunomodulation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5 (22), 2841–2855. doi:10.1002/adhm.201600316
Kou, L. F., Xiao, S. Y., Sun, R., Bao, S., Yao, Q., and Chen, R. (2019). Biomaterial-engineered intra-articular drug delivery systems for osteoarthritis therapy. Drug Deliv. 26 (1), 870–885. doi:10.1080/10717544.2019.1660434
Lee, J. S., Park, H. S., Jung, H., Lee, H., Hong, H., Lee, Y. J., et al. (2020). 3D-printable photocurable bioink for cartilage regeneration of tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Addit. Manuf. 33, 101136. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101136
Li, X., Lu, Y., Wang, Y. X., Zhou, S., Li, L., and Zhao, F. (2021b). Thermo-responsive injectable naringin-loaded hydrogel polymerised sodium alginate/bioglass delivery for articular cartilage. Drug Deliv. 28 (1), 1290–1300. doi:10.1080/10717544.2021.1938752
Li, X. L., Xu, Q., Johnson, M., Wang, X., Lyu, J., Li, Y., et al. (2021a). A chondroitin sulfate based injectable hydrogel for delivery of stem cells in cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials Sci. 9 (11), 4139–4148. doi:10.1039/d1bm00482d
Liu, W., Madry, H., and Cucchiarini, M. (2022b). Application of alginate hydrogels for next-generation articular cartilage regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23 (3), 1147. doi:10.3390/ijms23031147
Liu, X. M., Wei, Y. Q., Xuan, C. K., Liu, L., Lai, C., Chai, M., et al. (2020). A biomimetic biphasic osteochondral scaffold with layer-specific release of stem cell differentiation inducers for the reconstruction of osteochondral defects. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9 (23), 2000076. doi:10.1002/adhm.202000076
Liu, Y., Dzidotor, G., Le, T. T., Vinikoor, T., Morgan, K., Curry, E. J., et al. (2022a). Exercise-induced piezoelectric stimulation for cartilage regeneration in rabbits. Sci. Transl. Med. 14 (627), eabi7282. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.abi7282
Ma, Z. J., Song, W., He, D., Zhang, X., He, Y., and Li, H. (2022). Smart µ-fiber hydrogels with macro-porous structure for sequentially promoting multiple phases of articular cartilage regeneration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (22), 2113380. doi:10.1002/adfm.202113380
Makris, E. A., Gomoll, A. H., Malizos, K. N., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2015). Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11 (1), 21–34. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157
Man, Z. T., Hu, X. Q., Liu, Z. L., Huang, H., Meng, Q., Zhang, X., et al. (2016). Transplantation of allogenic chondrocytes with chitosan hydrogel-demineralized bone matrix hybrid scaffold to repair rabbit cartilage injury. Biomaterials 108, 157–167. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.002
Martel-Pelletier, J., Barr, A. J., Cicuttini, F. M., Conaghan, P. G., Cooper, C., Goldring, M. B., et al. (2016). Osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2, 16072. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.72
Mihajlovic, M., Rikkers, M., Mihajlovic, M., Viola, M., Schuiringa, G., Ilochonwu, B. C., et al. (2022). Viscoelastic chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronic acid double-network hydrogels with reversible cross-links. Biomacromolecules 23 (3), 1350–1365. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01583
Mokhtarinia, K., and Masaeli, E. (2023). Post-decellularized printing of cartilage extracellular matrix: distinction between biomaterial ink and bioink. Biomaterials Sci. 11 (7), 2317–2329. doi:10.1039/d2bm02111k
Murphy, M. P., Koepke, L. S., Lopez, M. T., Tong, X., Ambrosi, T. H., Gulati, G. S., et al. (2020). Articular cartilage regeneration by activated skeletal stem cells. Nat. Med. 26 (10), 1583–1592. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1013-2
Nettles, D. L., Vail, T. P., Morgan, M. T., Grinstaff, M. W., and Setton, L. A. (2004). Photocrosslinkable hyaluronan as a scaffold for articular cartilage repair. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32 (3), 391–397. doi:10.1023/b:abme.0000017552.65260.94
Poldervaart, M. T., Goversen, B., de Ruijter, M., Abbadessa, A., Melchels, F. P. W., Öner, F. C., et al. (2017). 3D bioprinting of methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogel with intrinsic osteogenicity. Plos One 12 (6), e0177628. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177628
Raina, N., Pahwa, R., Thakur, V. K., and Gupta, M. (2022). Polysaccharide-based hydrogels: new insights and futuristic prospects in wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 223, 1586–1603. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.115
Rastogi, P., and Kandasubramanian, B. (2019). Review of alginate-based hydrogel bioprinting for application in tissue engineering. Biofabrication 11 (4), 042001. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab331e
Ren, P. G., Zhang, H., Dai, Z., Ren, F., Wu, Y., Hou, R., et al. (2019). Stiff micelle-crosslinked hyaluronate hydrogels with low swelling for potential cartilage repair. J. Mater. Chem. B 7 (36), 5490–5501. doi:10.1039/c9tb01155b
Saygili, E., Kaya, E., Ilhan-Ayisigi, E., Saglam-Metiner, P., Alarcin, E., Kazan, A., et al. (2021). An alginate-poly(acrylamide) hydrogel with TGF-β3 loaded nanoparticles for cartilage repair: biodegradability, biocompatibility and protein adsorption. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 172, 381–393. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.069
Singh, A., Corvelli, M., Unterman, S. A., Wepasnick, K. A., McDonnell, P., and Elisseeff, J. H. (2014). Enhanced lubrication on tissue and biomaterial surfaces through peptide-mediated binding of hyaluronic acid. Nat. Mater. 13 (10), 988–995. doi:10.1038/nmat4048
Song, H., and Park, K. H. (2020). Regulation and function of SOX9 during cartilage development and regeneration. Seminars Cancer Biol. 67, 12–23. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.04.008
Stagnaro, P., Schizzi, I., Utzeri, R., Marsano, E., and Castellano, M. (2018). Alginate-polymethacrylate hybrid hydrogels for potential osteochondral tissue regeneration. Carbohydr. Polym. 185, 56–62. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.012
Su, L., Feng, Y. L., Wei, K. C., Xu, X., Liu, R., and Chen, G. Carbohydrate-based macromolecular biomaterials. Chem. Rev., 2021, 121(18): 10950-1029. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01338
Tao, K., Rey-Rico, A., Frisch, J., Venkatesan, J., Schmitt, G., Madry, H., et al. (2016). Raav-mediated combined gene transfer and overexpression of tgf-β and sox9 remodels human osteoarthritic articular cartilage. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 24, S397–S398. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.717
Trinh, K. T. L., Le, N. X. T., and Lee, N. Y. (2021). Microfluidic-based fabrication of alginate microparticles for protein delivery and its application in the in vitro chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 66, 102735. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102735
Tsanaktsidou, E., Kammona, O., and Kiparissides, C. (2022). Recent developments in hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Polymers 14 (4), 839. doi:10.3390/polym14040839
Wang, H. Z., Xu, Y., Wang, P. L., Ma, J. B., Wang, P. Q., Han, X. L., et al. (2021). Cell-mediated injectable blend hydrogel-BCP ceramic scaffold for in situ condylar osteochondral repair. Acta Biomater. 123, 364–378. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.056
Wang, M., Deng, Z. X., Guo, Y., and Xu, P. (2022a). Designing functional hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Mater. Today Bio 17, 100495. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100495
Wang, P. H., Pu, Y. J., Ren, Y. H., Yang, R., Zhang, W., Tan, X., et al. (2022b). Dynamic regulable sodium alginate/poly(γ-glutamic acid) hybrid hydrogels promoted chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 275, 118692. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118692
Wang, R., Leber, N., Buhl, C., Verdonschot, N., Dijkstra, P. J., and Karperien, M. (2014). Cartilage adhesive and mechanical properties of enzymatically crosslinked polysaccharide tyramine conjugate hydrogels. Polym. Adv. Technol. 25 (5), 568–574. doi:10.1002/pat.3286
Wang, T. Y., and Yang, F. (2017). A comparative study of chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate for directing three-dimensional chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. and Ther. 8, 284. doi:10.1186/s13287-017-0728-6
Weizel, A., Distler, T., Schneidereit, D., Friedrich, O., Bräuer, L., Paulsen, F., et al. (2020). Complex mechanical behavior of human articular cartilage and hydrogels for cartilage repair. Acta Biomater. 118, 113–128. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.025
Wongin, S., Narkbunnam, R., Waikakul, S., Chotiyarnwong, P., Aresanasuwan, T., Roytrakul, S., et al. (2021). Construction and evaluation of osteochondral-like tissue using chondrocyte sheet and cancellous bone. Tissue Eng. Part A 27 (3-4), 282–295. doi:10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0107
Xia, B. J., Chen, D., Zhang, J. S., Hu, S., Jin, H., and Tong, P. (2014). Osteoarthritis pathogenesis: a review of molecular mechanisms. Calcif. Tissue Int. 95 (6), 495–505. doi:10.1007/s00223-014-9917-9
Xiang, X. N., Zhu, S. Y., He, H. C., Yu, X., Xu, Y., and He, C. Q. (2022). Mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapy for cartilage regeneration in knee osteoarthritis. Stem Cell Res. and Ther. 13 (1), 14. doi:10.1186/s13287-021-02689-9
Xiao, H., Dong, Y. S., Wan, D. D., Wan, J., Huang, J., Tang, L., et al. (2023). Injectable hydrogel loaded with 4-octyl itaconate enhances cartilage regeneration by regulating macrophage polarization. Biomaterials Sci. 11 (7), 2445–2460. doi:10.1039/d2bm01894b
Xing, J. Q., Peng, X., Li, A. Q., Chen, M., Ding, Y., Xu, X., et al. (2021). Gellan gum/alginate-based Ca-enriched acellular bilayer hydrogel with robust interface bonding for effective osteochondral repair. Carbohydr. Polym. 270, 118382. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118382
Xu, C. Z., Zhang, X. S., Liu, S., Zhao, X., Geng, C., Wang, L., et al. (2021c). Selected phase separation renders high strength and toughness to polyacrylamide/alginate hydrogels with large-scale cross-linking zones. Acs Appl. Mater. and Interfaces 13 (21), 25383–25391. doi:10.1021/acsami.1c04577
Xu, L., Ma, F. B., Huang, J., Frankie Leung, K. L., Qin, C., Lu, W. W., et al. (2021a). Metformin hydrochloride encapsulation by alginate strontium hydrogel for cartilage regeneration by reliving cellular senescence. Biomacromolecules 22 (2), 671–680. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01488
Xu, X., Liang, Y. J., Li, X. F., Ouyang, K., Wang, M., Cao, T., et al. (2021b). Exosome-mediated delivery of kartogenin for chondrogenesis of synovial fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells and cartilage regeneration. Biomaterials 269, 120539. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120539
Yang, X. C., Lu, Z. H., Wu, H. Y., Li, W., Zheng, L., and Zhao, J. (2018b). Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. and Eng. C-Materials Biol. Appl. 83, 195–201. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002
Yang, Y. H., Lin, H., Shen, H., Wang, B., Lei, G., and Tuan, R. S. (2018a). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular matrix enhances chondrogenic phenotype of and cartilage formation by encapsulated chondrocytes in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater. 69, 71–82. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.043
Yao, Y. B., Wei, G., Deng, L. F., and Cui, W. (2023). Visualizable and lubricating hydrogel microspheres via nanoPOSS for cartilage regeneration. Adv. Sci. 10 (15), 2207438. doi:10.1002/advs.202207438
Yin, J., Yan, M. L., Wang, Y. C., Fu, J., and Suo, H. (2018). 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy. Acs Appl. Mater. and Interfaces 10 (8), 6849–6857. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b16059
Yu, F., Cao, X. D., Zeng, L., Zhang, Q., and Chen, X. (2013). An interpenetrating HA/G/CS biomimic hydrogel via Diels-Alder click chemistry for cartilage tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 97 (1), 188–195. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.046
Yuan, T., Li, Z. X., Zhang, Y., Shen, K., Zhang, X., Xie, R., et al. (2021). Injectable ultrasonication-induced silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage repair and regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A 27 (17-18), 1213–1224. doi:10.1089/ten.TEA.2020.0323
Zhang, F. X., Liu, P., Ding, W., Meng, Q. B., Su, D. H., Zhang, Q. C., et al. (2021a). Injectable Mussel-Inspired highly adhesive hydrogel with exosomes for endogenous cell recruitment and cartilage defect regeneration. Biomaterials 278, 121169. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121169
Zhang, H., Wu, S. L., Chen, W. K., Hu, Y., Geng, Z., and Su, J. (2023). Bone/cartilage targeted hydrogel: strategies and applications. Bioact. Mater. 23, 156–169. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.10.028
Zhang, M., and Zhao, X. (2020). Alginate hydrogel dressings for advanced wound management. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 162, 1414–1428. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.311
Zhang, Q., Xu, H. X., Wu, C., Shang, Y., Wu, Q., Wei, Q., et al. (2021b). Tissue fluid triggered enzyme polymerization for ultrafast gelation and cartilage repair. Angew. Chemie-International Ed. 60 (36), 19982–19987. doi:10.1002/anie.202107789
Zhang, S., Hu, P. L., Liu, T., Li, Z., Huang, Y., Liao, J., et al. (2019). Kartogenin hydrolysis product 4-aminobiphenyl distributes to cartilage and mediates cartilage regeneration. Theranostics 9 (24), 7108–7121. doi:10.7150/thno.38182
Zhe, M., Wu, X. Y., Yu, P. Y., Xu, J., Liu, M., Yang, G., et al. (2023). Recent advances in decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for 3D bioprinting in tissue engineering. Materials 16 (8), 3197. doi:10.3390/ma16083197
Zhou, H. Y., Chen, X. G., Kong, M., Liu, C. S., and Kennedy, J. F. (2008). Effect of molecular weight and degree of chitosan deacetylation on the preparation and characteristics of chitosan thermosensitive hydrogel as a delivery system. Carbohydr. Polym. 73 (2), 265–273. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.11.026
Zhou, Z. Y., Cui, J., Wu, S. L., Geng, Z., and Su, J. (2022). Silk fibroin-based biomaterials for cartilage/osteochondral repair. Theranostics 12 (11), 5103–5124. doi:10.7150/thno.74548
Zhu, C. H., Lei, H., Fan, D. D., Duan, Z., Li, X., Li, Y., et al. (2018). Novel enzymatic crosslinked hydrogels that mimic extracellular matrix for skin wound healing. J. Mater. Sci. 53 (8), 5909–5928. doi:10.1007/s10853-017-1956-y
Zhu, J. J., Yang, S. H., Qi, Y. D., Gong, Z., Zhang, H., Liang, K., et al. (2022). Stem cell-homing hydrogel-based miR-29b-5p delivery promotes cartilage regeneration by suppressing senescence in an osteoarthritis rat model. Sci. Adv. 8 (13), eabk0011. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk0011
Keywords: cartilage regeneration, polysaccharide, biomaterials, hydrogels, 3D bioprinting
Citation: Chen N, Li S, Miao C, Zhao Q, Dong J, Li L and Li C (2024) Polysaccharide-based hydrogels for cartilage regeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 12:1444358. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1444358
Received: 05 June 2024; Accepted: 14 August 2024;
Published: 11 October 2024.
Edited by:
Akihiko Ito, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, JapanReviewed by:
Jianjing Lin, Peking University, ChinaWenyong Xie, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, China
Zhen Yang, Peking University People’s Hospital, China
Copyright © 2024 Chen, Li, Miao, Zhao, Dong, Li and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lianxin Li, lilianxin@hotmail.com; Ci Li, drlici@163.com