Saeideh Nakhaei-Rad
Anna Fejtova- 1Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine Research Group, Institute of Biotechnology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
- 2Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- 3Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
Editorial on the Research Topic
Identifying the isoform-specific roles of RAS paralogs in health and disease
The RAS family of small GTPases is categorized into eight groups of paralogs: RAS, RAL, RRAS, RIT, RAP, RHEB, RASD, ERAS, and DIRAS. Although the prototypes of the RAS family, KRAS, NRAS, and HRAS, are well-known for their role in human carcinogenesis, RAS proteins also play fundamental roles in normal human development, by regulating a wide array of cellular processes, including survival, growth, adhesion, migration, differentiation and fate decision (Nakhaei-Rad et al., 2018). The dysregulation of the RAS signaling pathway leads to cancer as well as to developmental disorders, named RASopathies, connected with cardiac, skin, neuronal, and metabolic phenotypes.
At first glance, the RAS family with 26 isoforms and paralogs that harbor the conserved motifs and regions was tempting to have functional redundancy. However, new evidence indicates that each RAS family member harbors also number of specific features that make them to some degree unique in regulation, subcellular localization, effector selection, signaling strength, dynamics, timing, and networking (Nussinov et al., 2018; Hood et al., 2019; Nair et al., 2021; Pudewell et al., 2021; Simanshu and Morrison, 2022). Despite more than four decades of research on RAS, our understanding of the functional differences between the RAS isoforms and paralogs is very limited.
More dimensionality in RAS functions emerges from their tightly regulated transcription and translation by several molecular mechanisms during the cell cycle phases, developmental stages, tissue specifications, and in response to the various stimuli, stressors, and pathogenic conditions (Newlaczyl et al., 2017; Nussinov et al., 2021; Saliani et al., 2022; Hood et al., 2023). This topic includes one research and review articles that discuss the splice variants of small GTPases. Das et al. perform a comprehensive analysis of the small GTPase SpliceOme in various human tissues and highlight the impacts of environmental factors, age, sex, and RNA sequencing strategies on splicing dynamics. Philips and Nuevo-Tapioles describe and dissect in great detail the functional differences among two prominent KRAS splice variants, KRAS4A, and KRAS4B, in cancer development, metabolism, and progression.
The RAS signaling propagation and functional outcomes rely on their association and modulation of the diverse spectrum of downstream effector proteins. Of note, the functional specificity of the RAS isoforms and paralogs comes in part from their affinity and access to the specific effector proteins. The RAS-effector association is mainly conducted through the RAS-binding (RBD) or RAS association (RA) domains of the effectors. RAF and PI3 kinases, due to their impacts on the oncogenic functions of RAS, are well-investigated RAS effectors (Nakhaeizadeh et al., 2016; Rezaei Adariani et al., 2018). However, there are more than 57 proteins that contain the RA domain and RBD that also need to be further investigated as putative RAS effectors (Rezaei Adariani et al., 2021). This issue is addressed in the topic. Pudewell et al. focus on detailed aspects of the stress-activated MAP kinase-interacting protein 1 (SIN1) interaction mode with RAS paralogs and various types of membrane phosphoinositides. SIN1, a critical subunit of the mTOR complex 2, is a newly discovered RAS effector that harbors the RBD, and a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. They show that among RAS isoforms, SIN1-RBD binds more tightly to classical RAS family members and introduces new binding partners. The authors’ findings suggest that RAS interaction influences the membrane recruitment of SIN1.
To date, the majority of the available information about the RAS isoforms is obtained from studying human cancers. However, we need to admit that a wide spectrum of variable factors in cancer cells such as genome instability, chromosomal abnormalities, gene amplifications, presence of other mutations, and heterogeneous nature, will affect these findings. The germline point mutations of the RAS genes and their signaling components cause a group of syndromes including Cardio-Facio-Cutaneous (CFC), Costello (CS), Legius (LS), Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), Noonan (NS), and Noonan-like (NS with Multiple Lentigines, NSML) that are collectively known as RASopathies (Caye et al., 2015; Altmüller et al. 2017; Motta et al., 2020; Zenker, 2022). RASopathy patients carry a point mutation in one of the RAS signaling components or regulators leading to aberrant RAS signaling in all cells and tissues of the body, unravelling the tissue-specific function of specific RAS isoforms and RAS-MAPK signaling in general. Nandi et al. investigate the impacts of the HRASG12V mutation on bone loss and osteoclast differentiation and function in the mouse model of CS. They introduce the HRAS isoform as a regulator of bone homeostasis and show that its deregulation results in osteoporosis.
The development of advanced molecular approaches, including high-throughput molecular technologies, super-resolution microscopy techniques, computational models, genome editing, and single-cell analysis would have a great impact on improving our understanding of the cell-type and context-dependent functions of RAS isoform and paralogs in normal and pathological conditions. We hope that this Research Topic inspire researchers to more systematically and comprehensively investigate the underscored aspects of the individual RAS proteins and their signaling networks.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
AF was supported by BMBF GeNeRARe (FZ 01GM1902B) and SNR by the vice president for research of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (No. 55155). We are grateful to all contributing authors and reviewers for their magnificent work. We admit our special thanks for the impressive support received from Frontiers Team members.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Altmüller, F., Pothula, S., Annamneedi, A., Nakhaei-Rad, S., Montenegro-Venegas, C., Pina-Fernández, E., et al. (2017). Aberrant neuronal activity-induced signaling and gene expression in a mouse model of RASopathy. PLoS Genet. 13 (3), e1006684. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006684
Caye, A., Strullu, M., Guidez, F., Cassinat, B., Gazal, S., Fenneteau, O., et al. (2015). Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia displays mutations in components of the RAS pathway and the PRC2 network. Nat. Genet. 47 (11), 1334–1340. doi:10.1038/ng.3420
Hood, F. E., Klinger, B., Newlaczyl, A. U., Sieber, A., Dorel, M., Oliver, S. P., et al. (2019). Isoform-specific Ras signaling is growth factor dependent. Mol. Biol. Cell 30 (9), 1108–1117. doi:10.1091/mbc.E18-10-0676
Hood, F. E., Sahraoui, Y. M., Jenkins, R. E., and Prior, I. A. (2023). Ras protein abundance correlates with Ras isoform mutation patterns in cancer. Oncogene 2023, 02638. doi:10.1038/s41388-023-02638-1
Motta, M., Sagi-Dain, L., Krumbach, O. H. F., Hahn, A., Peleg, A., German, A., et al. (2020). Activating MRAS mutations cause Noonan syndrome associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 29 (11), 1772–1783. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddz108
Nair, A., Kubatzky, K. F., and Saha, B. (2021). Ras isoforms from lab benches to lives-what are we missing and how far are we? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (12), 6508. doi:10.3390/ijms22126508
Nakhaei-Rad, S., Haghighi, F., Nouri, P., Rezaei Adariani, S., Lissy, J., Kazemein Jasemi, N. S., et al. (2018). Structural fingerprints, interactions, and signaling networks of RAS family proteins beyond RAS isoforms. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 53 (2), 130–156. doi:10.1080/10409238.2018.1431605
Nakhaeizadeh, H., Amin, E., Nakhaei-Rad, S., Dvorsky, R., and Ahmadian, M. R. (2016). The RAS-effector interface: Isoform-specific differences in the effector binding regions. PLoS One 11 (12), e0167145. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167145
Newlaczyl, A. U., Coulson, J. M., and Prior, I. A. (2017). Quantification of spatiotemporal patterns of Ras isoform expression during development. Sci. Rep. 7, 41297. doi:10.1038/srep41297
Nussinov, R., Tsai, C. J., and Jang, H. (2018). Oncogenic ras isoforms signaling specificity at the membrane. Cancer Res. 78 (3), 593–602. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2727
Nussinov, R., Zhang, M., Maloney, R., and Jang, H. (2021). Ras isoform-specific expression, chromatin accessibility, and signaling. Biophys. Rev. 13 (4), 489–505. doi:10.1007/s12551-021-00817-6
Pudewell, S., Wittich, C., Kazemein Jasemi, N. S., Bazgir, F., and Ahmadian, M. R. (2021). Accessory proteins of the RAS-MAPK pathway: Moving from the side line to the front line. Commun. Biol. 4 (1), 696. doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02149-3
Rezaei Adariani, S., Buchholzer, M., Akbarzadeh, M., Nakhaei-Rad, S., Dvorsky, R., and Ahmadian, M. R. (2018). Structural snapshots of RAF kinase interactions. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 46 (6), 1393–1406. doi:10.1042/BST20170528
Rezaei Adariani, S., Kazemein Jasemi, N. S., Bazgir, F., Wittich, C., Amin, E., Seidel, C. A. M., et al. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of RAS-effector interactions reveals interaction hotspots and new binding partners. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100626. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100626
Saliani, M., Mirzaiebadizi, A., Javadmanesh, A., Siavoshi, A., and Ahmadian, M. R. (2022). KRAS-related long noncoding RNAs in human cancers. Cancer Gene Ther. 29 (5), 418–427. doi:10.1038/s41417-021-00381-x
Simanshu, D. K., and Morrison, D. K. (2022). A structure is worth a thousand words: New insights for RAS and RAF regulation. Cancer Discov. 12 (4), 899–912. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1494
Keywords: RAS, effector, isoform, paralog, cancer, rasopathy
Citation: Nakhaei-Rad S and Fejtova A (2023) Editorial: Identifying the isoform-specific roles of RAS paralogs in health and disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11:1199356. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1199356
Received: 03 April 2023; Accepted: 06 April 2023;
Published: 13 April 2023.
Edited and reviewed by:
Ana Cuenda, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), SpainCopyright © 2023 Nakhaei-Rad and Fejtova. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Saeideh Nakhaei-Rad, cy5uYWtoYWVpcmFkQHVtLmFjLmly; Anna Fejtova, QW5uYS5GZWp0b3ZhQHVrLWVybGFuZ2VuLmRl