- 1Department of Biological Sciences and Centre for Bioimaging Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- 2Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
Matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) play crucial roles in extracellular matrix (ECM) modulation during osteoclast-driven bone remodeling. In the present study, we used transcriptome profiling of bone cells in a medaka model for osteoporosis and bone regeneration to identify factors critical for bone remodeling and homeostasis. This identified mmp13b, which was strongly expressed in osteoblast progenitors and upregulated under osteoporotic conditions and during regeneration of bony fin rays. To characterize the role of mmp13b in bone remodeling, we generated medaka mmp13b mutants by CRISPR/Cas9. We found that mmp13b mutants form normal numbers of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. However, osteoclast activity was severely impaired under osteoporotic conditions. In mmp13b mutants and embryos treated with the MMP13 inhibitor CL-82198, unmineralized collagens and mineralized bone matrix failed to be degraded. In addition, the dynamic migratory behavior of activated osteoclasts was severely affected in mmp13b mutants. Expression analysis showed that maturation genes were downregulated in mmp13b deficient osteoclasts suggesting that they remain in an immature and non-activated state. We also found that fin regeneration was delayed in mmp13b mutants with a concomitant alteration of the ECM and reduced numbers of osteoblast progenitors in regenerating joint regions. Together, our findings suggest that osteoblast-derived Mmp13b alters the bone ECM to allow the maturation and activation of osteoclasts during bone remodeling in a paracrine manner. Mmp13b-induced ECM alterations are also required to facilitate osteoblast progenitor recruitment and full regeneration of bony fin rays.
Introduction
A combination of controlled resorption of old bone matrix by osteoclasts and formation of new matrix by osteoblasts at sites of bone remodeling is needed to maintain a healthy skeleton (reviewed by Hadjidakis and Androulakis, 2006; reviewed by Raggatt and Partridge, 2010). The respective cell activities are coordinated by known signaling pathways. For osteoclasts, signaling by M-CSF/c-Fms and RANKL-RANK pathways has been shown to induce osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption (reviewed by Boyle et al., 2003). Osteoblast differentiation on the other hand depends on signaling most prominently through the WNT and BMP pathways (reviewed by Fakhry et al., 2013). Besides growth factor signaling, contact-dependent cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions are also required for bone cell activation. For instance, the resorptive activity of mature osteoclasts is controlled by direct cell-cell contact with osteoblasts (Furuya et al., 2018). Osteoclasts also require close contact to ECM to initiate bone resorption, which involves binding of integrins such as αVβ3 on the osteoclast surface to RGD peptides made available in the ECM (reviewed by Alford et al., 2015). In many cases, these interactions are triggered by the activity of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), which are extracellular, zinc-dependent endopeptidases that degrade bone matrix proteins, such as collagens, and modulate the structure and composition of ECM (reviewed in Hardy and Fernandez-Patron, 2020). MMPs are expressed by osteoblasts, osteocytes and osteoclasts and exhibit various functions in controlling bone cell behavior during bone remodeling (reviewed by Paiva and Granjeiro, 2017). Several MMPs were earlier described to be secreted into bone resorption lacunae, including MMP2, MMP9, MMP13, and MMP14 (reviewed by Paiva and Granjeiro, 2017). Interestingly, in this process, non-osteoclastic cells such as osteoblasts produce MMP2 and MMP13, while osteoclasts express MMP9 and MMP14. The fact that a combination of both osteoblast- and osteoclast-derived MMPs contributes to resorptive activity implies a possible role of MMPs in bone cell coupling to control osteoclast activity (Yamagiwa et al., 1999; Andersen et al., 2004; Zhu et al., 2020). When the intricate communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts and their respective interactions with ECM components is impaired, it leads to excessive bone resorption and osteoporosis (reviewed in Feng and McDonald, 2011). Interestingly, MMPs are also implicated in bone formation. Accordingly, in Mmp2−/− mice bone mineralization was impaired and numbers of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts reduced (Mosig et al., 2007). This indicates a complex interplay of distinct MMPs produced by different bone cell types during bone remodeling. It, however, remains largely unclear, how osteoblasts, whose main role is to deposit bone matrix, contribute to the activation of osteoclasts by modulating the ECM.
In teleost fish, osteoblasts are key drivers for bone formation in the regenerating fins. This process involves dedifferentiation as well as de novo formation of osteoblasts, which produce the ECM template needed for remineralization of the regenerating fin rays (Knopf et al., 2011; reviewed by Sehring and Weidinger, 2020; Singh et al., 2012). We recently identified two populations of col10a1-positive osteoblast progenitors that contribute to the formation of segmental osteoblasts and new joint cells in the regenerating fins (Dasyani et al., 2019).
To identify common and distinct molecular aspects of osteoblast-driven bone remodeling during osteoporosis and bone regeneration, we utilized a medaka model, in which excessive bone resorption can be induced by transgenic Rankl expression (To et al., 2012; Phan et al., 2020b). We compared the transcriptome profiles of col10a1 osteoblast progenitors in medaka embryos after Rankl induction and in adult caudal fins at 2 days post amputation (dpa). This identified a significant up-regulation of mmp13b under both conditions. Earlier studies on human breast tumors had shown that MMP13 promotes formation of osteoclasts to trigger bone resorption and bone metastasis (Pivetta et al., 2011). On the other hand, morpholino-mediated knock-down of mmp13a in zebrafish resulted in impaired differentiation of osteoblasts (Li et al., 2020). In medaka, other than in zebrafish, bone is acellular and lacks osteocytes [(Ofer et al., 2019); PMID: 30707688]. Osteocytes are terminally differentiated osteoblasts that are embedded in bone matrix and produce MMP13 (Jáuregui et al., 2016). In this cellular context, MMP13 is needed for dynamic remodeling of bone matrix in lacunar-canalicular networks that osteocytes use to communicate with other osteocytes, osteoblasts and osteoclasts to regulate bone density (reviewed in Moharrer and Boerckel, 2021). Together, this suggests distinct roles of Mmp13 in complex interplays of various bone cell types to control formation and activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts that are not fully understood.
Here, we generated mmp13b knock-out medaka mutants and characterized its function in bone remodeling and fin regeneration. We show that mmp13b is strongly expressed in osteoblast progenitors and that enzymatic metalloprotease activity is elevated in osteoblasts after Rankl induction. We further demonstrate that Mmp13b promotes osteoclast maturation and activity under osteoporotic conditions. Excessive bone formation in mmp9−/−;mmp13−/− double-mutants without Rankl induction suggests that also the activity of endogenous osteoclasts is impaired. In addition, mmp13b mutants exhibit delayed fin regeneration and altered ECM composition with reduced numbers of osteoblast progenitors in joints. Our study therefore shows that osteoblast derived Mmp13 is necessary for progenitor recruitment and for osteoclast activation in a non-cell autonomous fashion.
Materials and Methods
Maintenance of Medaka Lines
Transgenic medaka were maintained in the fish facility at the Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore (DBS, NUS). All breeding and experimental procedures were conducted under protocols approved by the Institute of Animal Care and Use Committee of the National University of Singapore (IACUC; protocol numbers: BR19-0120, R18-0562).
Isolation of Bone Cells and RNA Sequencing
Purification of medaka bone cells by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) was described previously (Buettner et al., 2018; Phan et al., 2020b). Briefly, rankl:HS:cfp transgenic larvae with col10a1:GFP, osx:mCherry, or ctsk:GFP reporter backgrounds were heat-shocked at 9 days post fertilization (dpf) at 39°C for 2 h to collect col10a1-positive osteoblast progenitors and osx-positive osteoblasts at 10 dpf, and ctsk-positive osteoclasts at 12 dpf. Transgenic reporter larvae without Rankl transgene were used as control. mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− larvae with rankl:HS:cfp/ctsk:mCherry transgenic background were heat-shocked at 9 dpf at 39°C for 2 h and used to collect mCherry-positive osteoclasts at 3 days post heat-shock (dphs). To collect GFP-positive osteoblast progenitors from caudal fins, 2–3 month-old col10a1:GFP transgenic fish were used. Tissue dissociation was performed using a Papain Dissociation System (Worthington Biochemical Corporation) following the manufacturer’s instructions. FACS was conducted using a BD FACS Aria II 5 lasers cytometer. RNA was isolated from FACS purified cells using the Purelink™ RNA micro kit (Invitrogen). RNA quality was measured with an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 and Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit (Agilent Technologies, United States), and samples with a RIN value > 8.0 were sent to Novogene for RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. The sequencing results were deposited to NCBI’s BioProject, under accession number PRJNA767186.
Quantitative RT-PCR
RNA was isolated from FACS purified cells and whole mount fins at 2 days post amputation (dpa) using a Purelink™ RNA micro kit (Invitrogen) and cDNA was synthesized and amplified using a PreAmp and Reverse Transcription Master Mix Kit (Fluidigm). qPCR was performed with PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). All primers used for qPCR are listed in Supplementary Table S3. β-actin was used for normalization. All experiments were performed with three biological samples and three technical repeats each. Samples for RNAseq analysis and qPCR validation were obtained from independent experiments. Data were analyzed using the Bio-Rad CFX Maestro 1.0 software and Student’s t test was performed for statistical analysis.
RNA in situ Hybridization
Riboprobes spanning 659 nucleotides of the mmp13b cDNA (nt458-nt1116; ENSORLG00000014453; http://www.ensembl.org/) were synthesized using a DIG RNA labeling kit (Roche, CAT# 11175025910). The synthesis of a col10a1 riboprobe was described previously (Renn et al., 2013). RNA in situ hybridization was conducted on cryosections as described previously (McMillan et al., 2018) with small modifications. The NBT/BCIP (Sigma) staining solution was added onto the sections and stained at room temperature. Then, the sections were washed with PBS-Tween 20 (PBST) and mounted in Mowiol 4-88 (Calbiochem) for imaging.
Generation of mmp9 and mmp13b Mutants
Guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting mmp9 (ENSORLG00000006340) and mmp13b (ENSORLG00000014453) were designed using the CRISPR/Cas9 target online prediction tool (CCTop) (Stemmer et al., 2015) and synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT Singapore; sequences in Supplementary Table S3). Three gRNAs (36 ng/μL each) were co-injected into one-cell stage medaka embryos together with tracrRNA (67 ng/μL, IDT) and Cas9 nuclease (0.25 μg/μL, IDT). Primers used for genotyping (mmp9_FP/RP, mmp13b_FP/RP) are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
MMP13 Inhibitor Treatment
The selective MMP13 inhibitor CL-82198 hydrochloride (TOCRIS, CAT# 2632) was dissolved in H2O to make a 50 mM stock solution. The stock solution was stored at room temperature and working solutions were prepared freshly for every use. Pre-treatment was performed on rankl:HS:cfp transgenic larvae from 7–9 dpf with 300 μM CL-82198 (12 μl stock in 2 ml fish medium). Larvae were heat-shocked at 9 dpf to induce Rankl expression, followed by consecutive treatment from 9–12 dpf with 300 μM CL-82198. Control fish were treated with 12 μl H2O in 2 ml fish medium from 7–12 dpf. All larvae were kept at 30°C in an incubator throughout the treatment period.
Bone Staining
12 dpf larvae were transferred to 0.004% calcein staining solution for 1 hour at 30°C in the dark. Then, the larvae were washed with fish medium before mounting in 1.2% low melting agarose for imaging. Alizarin Red bone staining of 12 dpf larvae and 17 dpa fins was performed as previously described (Renn and Winkler, 2009).
Quantification of Osteoclast Numbers and Lesion Sizes
Fluorescent images of whole embryos were used for the quantification of osteoclast numbers following the method described previously (Phan et al., 2020a). For quantification of bone lesion sizes, four consecutive vertebral bodies were used for each analysis. The lesion percentage was determined as 100%*[0.5* (lesion area/total area) + 0.5* (number of absorbed arches/4)]. For statistical analysis, a Student’s t test (two-tailed, unpaired) was performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States).
Picro Sirius Red and Immunostaining
Collagen staining was performed on 20 μm cryosections using a Picro Sirius Red Stain Kit (ab150681; Abcam, UnitedStates) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cryosection slides were defrosted at room temperature for 5 min before rehydration in water. Sections were incubated with Picro sirius red staining solution for 1 h and thereafter rinsed with acetic acid before dehydration with absolute ethanol and mounting in synthetic resin for imaging.
Immunostaining on 20 μm cryosections was performed as described previously (Phan et al., 2020a). The following primary antibodies were used: Rabbit anti-collagen 1 (ab23730, Abcam), mouse anti-collagen 2 (II-II6B3; Developmental Studies Hybrydoma Bank, United States), rabbit anti-fibronectin (F3648, Sigma, United States), rabbit anti-Tenascin (T2550-23, United States Biological, United States). As secondary antibodies, goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 633 (Thermofisher Scientific) and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 633 (Thermofisher Scientific) were used. The numbers of analyzed sections is listed in Supplementary Table S4.
Tartrate Resistant Acidic Phosphatase Staining
TRAP staining on 20 μm cryosections was performed as described previously (Ethiraj et al., 2021). This included defrosting slides at room temperature, washing with PBS and incubating the slides with TRAP staining solution for 2 h. After this, slides were washed with PBS and mounted in Mowiol 4-88 for imaging.
Caudal fins were collected from 3 month-old adult medaka with mpeg1:mCherry transgenic background at 2 dpa and cryosectioned to obtain 20 μm longitudinal sections. Sections were stained with TRAP staining reagent for 6 h at room temperature. The same fin sections were imaged before and after TRAP staining.
DQ Collagen in situ Zymography
Collagen in situ zymography was conducted as described before but with slight modifications (Bai et al., 2005; Li et al., 2020). Rankl-transgenic larvae were heat-shocked at 9 dpf and fixed at 12 dpf with 4% PFA at 4°C overnight. 20 μm transverse sections from the trunk were obtained by cryosectioning and dried at room temperature for 2 h, followed by PBST washing and counterstaining with DAPI. DQ collagen substrate conjugated with FITC (ThermoFisher Scientific; D12060) was utilized as substrate for in situ zymography. DQ collagen was dissolved in milliQ water to obtain a 1 mg/ml stock solution. 1% low-melting agarose (LMA) was dissolved in substrate buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 5.0 mM CaCl2, 5.0 μM ZnSO4; Ph 7.5). 200 μl gel containing 40 μl collagen stock solution, 60 μl substrate buffer, and 100 μl 1% LMA was coated on sections and sections were incubated at 37°C for 18 h. After incubation, sections were washed with PBST and mounted in Mowiol 4-88 for imaging. For negative control, slides were incubated at −20°C for 18 h.
Imaging
For live fluorescence imaging, larvae were anesthetized with 0.016% Tricaine (MS222, Sigma), mounted in 1.2% low melting agarose on a glass-bottom Petri dish, and imaged using an Olympus FluoView FV3000 confocal microscope and a Nikon SMZ18 stereomicroscope equipped with the NIS-Elements BR 3.0 software. Olympus FluoView FV3000 confocal microscope was also used for time-lapse imaging and imaging of RNA in situ hybridization sections. The Nikon SMZ18 stereomicroscope was used to image Alizarin Red stained larvae and fins. To image Picro sirius red stained and TRAP-stained sections as well as RNA in situ hybridization sections, a Nikon Eclipse 90i upright microscope equipped with NIS-Elements BR 3.0 software was used. Immunostained sections were imaged with a LSM 900 Airyscan II super-resolution confocal laser scanning microscope. Images and time-lapse movies were processed with Bitplane Imaris and Fiji.
Results
mmp13b is Expressed in Medaka Osteoblast Progenitors and Upregulated Under Osteoporotic Conditions and in Regenerating Fins
To identify genes implicated in bone remodeling, we previously performed transcriptome profiling of bone cells in a medaka osteoporosis model where transgenic Rankl expression is induced by heat shock (Phan et al., 2020b; To et al., 2012). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in col10a1 positive osteoblast progenitors and osterix (osx) positive osteoblasts at 1 day post heat-shock (1 dphs; i.e., 10 days post fertilization, dpf) and in cathepsin K (ctsk) positive osteoclasts at 3 dphs (Figure 1A) (Phan et al., 2020b). In the present study, we performed RNA sequencing of col10a1 cells isolated from regenerating caudal fins. In the medaka fin, col10a1 positive osteoblast progenitors are located along segments of the mineralized hemirays and in joints linking the segments. After amputation, col10a1 cells migrate to the amputation site and contribute to the regenerating fin rays (Dasyani et al., 2019; illustrated in Figure 1B). Here, we analyzed the transcriptomes of col10a1 cells purified from fins at 0- and 2-days post amputation (dpa; Supplementary Figure S1). 14,377 transcripts were detected in col10a1 cells (Supplementary Figure S1A), and among them, 3591 were differentially regulated, with 1855 significantly up-regulated at 2 dpa (Supplementary Figure S1B). A KEGG analysis revealed enrichment of, e.g., cell cycle genes, indicative for enhanced cell division of osteoblast progenitors during regeneration (Dasyani et al., 2019) as well as ECM-receptor interactions, among others (Supplementary Figure S1C).
FIGURE 1. mmp13b is upregulated in bone remodeling and fin regeneration in medaka. (A) Medaka Rankl-induced osteoporosis model (for details, see Phan et al., 2020b; To et al., 2012). Transgenic lines used to visualize osteoclasts (ctsk:GFP), osteoblast progenitors (col10a1:GFP), and osteoblasts (osx:mCherry), respectively. Rankl induction is indicated by CFP expression. Ectopic osteoclast formation along the trunk (yellow arrows) after Rankl induction, followed by accumulation of osteoblast progenitors and osteoblasts in centra (white arrows). Scale bar: 1 mm. (B) Medaka fin regeneration. col10a1-positive osteoblast progenitors (green line and dots) are located along segments and in joints; after amputation, cells in joints migrate to the amputation plane (black line) for blastema formation and regeneration at 2 dpa. (C) Venn diagram showing total number of up-regulated genes expressed in osteoblast progenitors in 2 dpa regenerating fins and 10 dpf Rankl+ osteoporotic larvae, with the overlapping region showing commonly expressed genes. All genes have adjusted p values <0.05. (D) Table summarizing mmp13b baseMean and fold change values obtained by RNAseq and qPCR analysis, respectively. mmp13b is up-regulated in osteoblast progenitors (col10a1), osteoblasts (osx) at 10 dpf and osteoclasts (ctsk) at 12 dpf after Rankl induction. Student’s two-tailed t test. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. (E) Endogenous mmp13b expression revealed by RNA in situ hybridization in 12 dpf medaka trunk cross-sections. mmp13b expression is found in the neural arch (magenta arrow) and the outer notochord surface (cyan arrow), where also col10a1 is expressed. A mmp13b sense probe shows no staining. Scale bar: 50 μm.
Next, to identify genes commonly regulated during bone remodeling under osteoporosis-like lesions and in bone regeneration, we compared the regeneration dataset with the previously obtained osteoporosis dataset (Phan et al., 2020b). This revealed nine genes that were commonly upregulated in col10a1 cells (Figure 1C; Table 1). One of them was mmp13b, which showed high expression levels and a significant fold change in both datasets. Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) analysis of FACS purified col10a1 cells validated mmp13b up-regulation consistent with the idea that this metalloprotease is implicated in both bone resorption and repair. We also noticed mmp13b up-regulation in Rankl-induced (Rankl+) ctsk osteoclasts at 12 dpf. However, the baseMean expression levels were considerably lower than in osteoblasts (Figure 1D). To confirm expression of mmp13b in osteoblast progenitors, RNA in situ hybridization of wildtype embryos at 12 dpf showed mmp13b expression along neural arches (Figure 1E, magenta arrow) and the outer surface of the notochord (Figure 1E, cyan arrow), where col10a1 cells reside. Together, this suggests that mmp13b is expressed in osteoblast progenitors, and that its expression is significantly upregulated under Rankl+ and regeneration conditions.
TABLE 1. Commonly upregulated genes in col10a1 osteoblast progenitors of Rankl-induced medaka embryos at 10 dpf and in regenerating fins at 2 dpa.
Reduced Bone Resorption Under mmp13b Deficient Conditions
We hypothesized that osteoblast-derived Mmp13b contributes to bone resorption in Rankl embryos and generated knock-out mutants using CRISPR/Cas9 to further characterize its function in medaka (Supplementary Figure S2). Homozygous mmp13b mutants were viable and showed no obvious phenotype during embryogenesis. After Rankl induction, ectopic osteoclasts formed normally at 2 dphs (11 dpf) with similar numbers in mmp13b+/+ siblings and mmp13b−/− mutants (Figures 2A,B). Next, we assessed the extent of bone resorption after Rankl induction by calcein staining. In mmp13b+/+ embryos, excessive bone resorption was evident, with lesions in the centra (Figure 2C; white arrows) and completely resorbed neural arches (yellow arrowheads). In contrast, mmp13b−/− mutants exhibited significantly less bone resorption with a 7.5% reduction in bone matrix lesions on average (Figure 2D). This suggests that a mmp13b deficiency does not affect formation of osteoclasts, but that Mmp13b is necessary for osteoclast activity.
FIGURE 2. A mmp13b knock-out and chemical inhibition leads to reduced osteoclast resorption after Rankl induction. (A) Overview and high-magnification confocal images of mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− siblings in rankl:HS:cfp/ctsk:mCherry transgenic background at 2 dphs (11 dpf). Similar osteoclast formation in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− at 2 dphs. (B) Quantification of ctsk:mCherry osteoclast numbers in vertebral column [region marked as white boxes in (A)] in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− siblings at 2 dphs. (C) Overview and high-magnification confocal images of calcein stained mineralized matrix in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− siblings at 3 dphs (12 dpf). Wildtype siblings but not homozygous mutants show severe resorption of mineralized matrix at neural arches (yellow arrowheads) and vertebral bodies (white arrows). (D) Quantification of bone lesions in vertebral column and neural arch [region marked as white boxes in (C)] in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− siblings at 3 dphs. (E) Overview and high-magnification views of Alizarin red (AR) stained mineralized matrix in water and CL-82198 hydrochloride treated larvae at 3 dphs (12 dpf). Severe resorption of neural arches (yellow arrowheads) and vertebral bodies (white arrows) in control, while neural arches persisted and vertebral bodies had less resorption in treated larvae. (F) Quantification of bone lesions in vertebral column and neural arches [region marked as black boxes in (E)] in water and CL-82198 hydrochloride treated larvae at 3 dphs. Error bars indicate mean ± SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns, not significant, unpaired Student’s two-tailed t test. Scale bar: 1 mm (overview images), 100 μm (zoom in images).
To confirm this, we used the MMP13 inhibitor CL-82198 hydrochloride in medaka and examined bone resorption after Rankl induction. Like mmp13b mutants, CL-82198 treated embryos exhibited reduced bone resorption, when compared to controls, with less lesions in the vertebral centra (Figure 2E; white arrows) and mostly intact neural arches (yellow arrowheads). Quantifications revealed a significant reduction of the area with bone lesions in CL-82198 treated larvae compared to controls (Figure 2F), which was consistent with the phenotype in mmp13b knock-out mutants. Together, both knock-out of mmp13b and chemical inhibition with a MMP13 inhibitor in medaka led to impaired bone resorption after Rankl induction, suggesting a possible non-cell autonomous role in controlling osteoclast activity.
Impaired Collagen Degradation After Rankl Induction in mmp13b Mutants
In medaka, blocking Mmp13b activity reduced Rankl-induced resorption of mineralized bone matrix. To investigate whether the degradation of non-mineralized collagen was also affected, a Picro-Sirius Red staining was conducted in mmp13b−/− mutants at 12 dpf to detect distribution of collagen fibres. During normal bone development (without Rankl induction, Rankl-), collagen staining was observed along the neural and hemal arches (Figure 3A; black arrowheads), and the outer surface of the notochord (blue arrowhead) in both wildtype siblings and homozygous mutants. In contrast, after Rankl induction, mmp13b+/+ but not mmp13b−/− embryos showed strongly reduced collagen staining (Figure 3A; magenta arrowhead and circle), suggesting robust collagen degradation in wildtype siblings but not in mmp13b−/− mutants. A quantification revealed that more than half of the analyzed transverse sections (8/14 = 57%) showed reduced collagen staining for wildtype embryos, while a similar reduction was observed in only 23% of sections (6/26) from mmp13b−/− mutants (Figure 3B).
FIGURE 3. Impaired collagen degradation in mmp13b mutants after Rankl induction. (A) Picro sirius red stained cryosections from 12 dpf mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− larvae under Rankl- and Rankl+ conditions. Normal collagen distribution in neural arches and hemal arches (black arrows), and notochord surface (blue arrows) in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− siblings under Rankl- condition. After Rankl induction (Rankl+), wildtype siblings but not homozygous mutants show reduced Picro sirius staining (magenta arrow and circle). (B) Quantification of the percentage of the sections with reduced Picrosirius in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− after Rankl induction at 12 dpf. (C) Confocal images of transverse trunk sections from mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− larvae immunostained for collagen 1 (magenta) at 12 dpf. Without Rankl induction (Rankl-), collagen 1 protein is found along the outer surface of the notochord and notochordal sheath in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− siblings. After Rankl induction (Rankl+), collagen 1 is degraded and transcytosed to the distal side of osteoclasts (yellow) in both mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− (green arrows). Transcytosed collagen 1 is less abundant in mmp13b−/− mutants. More than three larvae from each genotype were used for analysis. The section numbers used for each experiment are listed in Supplementary Table S4. Scale bar: 25 μm.
Collagen 1 is the major component of non-mineralized collagen fibres (Blair et al., 2016). Therefore, we performed Col1 immunostaining on transverse trunk sections of wildtype control siblings and mmp13b−/− embryos at 12 dpf (Figure 3C). Under non-osteoporotic Rankl- conditions, Col1 staining was observed along the outer surface of notochord and notochordal sheath in both wildtype siblings and mmp13b−/− mutants. In Rankl + embryos, on the other hand, Col1 was degraded and re-distributed to the distal side of osteoclasts in wildtype siblings (Figure 3C; green arrowheads), which is consistent with the process of transcytosis as described earlier (Salo et al., 1997; Ng et al., 2019). In mmp13b−/− embryos, however, redistributed Col1 fragments were significantly fewer in numbers when compared to wildtype siblings, indicating impaired degradation and transcytosis of Col1 in mmp13b mutants. Together, this suggests that Mmp13b is required for osteoclast resorption, including the degradation and transcytosis of non-mineralized collagens and resorption of mineralized bone matrix.
Altered Morphology and Impaired Dynamics of Osteoclasts in mmp13b Mutants
Our findings suggested that osteoclasts form normally but show impaired resorption activities in mmp13b mutants. To understand the causes of reduced activity, we analyzed the maturation and migratory dynamics of osteoclasts in mmp13b mutants. First, ctsk-positive osteoclasts were isolated by FACS from mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− embryos at 12 dpf, and qPCR was conducted to examine transcription levels of several osteoclast differentiation genes, which we had earlier identified in medaka as upregulated under Rankl+ conditions (Phan et al., 2020a). These included mmp9, rank, ctsk, traf6, TRAP, and il10, as well as ECM-related genes, such as col6a1, col6a3, itga2.2, and itgb8 (Figure 4A). Compared to wildtype siblings, mmp9, rank, ctsk, and traf6 were significantly down-regulated in osteoclasts of mmp13b−/− mutants. Furthermore, il10, which is down-regulated in differentiated osteoclasts, had significantly increased transcription levels in mmp13b−/- osteoclasts. Together, this suggests that osteoclasts had retained an immature state and failed to fully differentiate in mmp13b mutants. Also, col6a1, col6a3, itga2.2, and itgb8 were significantly down-regulated in osteoclasts of mmp13b−/− mutants, opening the possibility that bone cell-ECM interactions are impaired in mutant embryos. Surprisingly, the only osteoclast marker that we found up-regulated in mmp13b mutants, was TRAP. Consistently, also enzymatic TRAP activity could be detected in ctsk-positive cells by histochemical staining in transverse sections of mmp13b−/− embryos, while their distribution appeared affected (Supplementary Figure S3).
FIGURE 4. Osteoclast maturation and dynamics is impaired in mmp13b mutants. (A) Expression of differentiation genes in osteoclasts from mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b-/- larvae at 3 dphs examined by qPCR. Significant down-regulation of mmp9, traf6, ctsk, rank, itga2.2, itgb8, col6a1, col6a3, and up-regulation of il10 and TRAP in mmp13b-/- osteoclasts compared to mmp13b+/+. (B) Quantification of osteoclast sphericity in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b-/- siblings. Compared to mmp13b+/+, osteoclasts in mmp13b-/- show larger sphericity, indicating a rounder morphology in mutants. Sphericity Ψ is the ratio of the surface area of a sphere (with the same volume as the given particle) to the surface area of the particle.
Next, to assess morphology and migratory dynamics of osteoclasts during bone resorption, live time-lapse imaging was conducted in wildtype siblings (Supplementary Movie S1) and mmp13b−/− mutants (Supplementary Movie S2) with a rankl:HS:cfp/ctsk:mCherry background starting from 48 h post heat-shock (hphs) at 11 dpf. Based on these movies, we determined sphericity, area, and migratory speed of osteoclasts. Compared to wildtype, osteoclasts in mmp13b−/− mutants generally exhibited higher sphericity (Figure 4B). At around 55 hphs (7 h after time-lapse imaging started), we observed that ctsk-positive cells generally exhibit a range of varying cell sizes and surface areas, and that this range was altered in mutants. For wildtype, most ctsk-positive osteoclasts could be categorized into three major clusters defined by distinct surface areas. Cells could be categorized into cluster 1 (with a surface area of 400–500 μm2), cluster 2 (1,000–2,000 μm2), and cluster 3 (>10,000 μm2) (Figure 4C). Osteoclasts in cluster 1 appeared as small and round cells, cells in cluster 2 had an elongated morphology, and cells in cluster 3 were characterized by large extended surface areas (Figure 4D). In stark contrast, most ctsk-positive cells in mmp13b mutants displayed a shift towards smaller area ranges, which we defined as cluster 4 (300–400 μm2) (Figure 4C), with rounder and smaller appearance (Figure 4D). Comparing osteoclasts in mmp13b−/− mutants with that in wildtype, we noticed a significant increase in the percentage of mutant cells in the 300–400 μm2 range and a significant decrease in the >10,000 μm2 range (Figure 4C). Finally, also the speed of dynamically moving osteoclasts was affected in mutants. In the first 1.5 h of time-lapse analysis (around 48–49.5 hphs), osteoclasts from wildtype siblings (N = 6) moved significantly faster than that from homozygous mutants (N = 5) (Figure 4E; and Supplementary Movies S1, S2). After 1.5 h, when the first highly active osteoclasts start to slow down to attach to bone matrix, there was no significant difference in the speed between wildtype and mutant osteoclasts. In summary, osteoclasts in mmp13b mutants exhibited signs of incomplete maturation upon Rankl induction when compared to wildtype siblings, suggesting that osteoblast-derived Mmp13b promotes osteoclast maturation and initiates osteoclast dynamics during bone remodeling.
Elevated MMP Enzyme Activity in Osteoblasts Upon Rankl-Induction
Transcript levels for mmp13b were elevated upon Rankl induction as shown by RNAseq analysis and qPCR. To test whether upregulated RNA levels also translated into increased enzymatic metalloprotease (MMP) activity, we performed in situ zymography using a DQ-collagen substrate as described previously (Li et al., 2020). Control cryosections incubated at −20°C showed no or very little background enzymatic activity (Figure 5A). In contrast, strong enzymatic activity was observed in mmp13b+/+ embryos after Rankl induction around muscle fibres, neural progenitors, chordoblasts inside the notochord and cells lining the notochord on the outside (Figure 5B). In mmp13b−/− mutants, on the other hand, enzymatic activity in chordoblasts and notochord-lining cells was markedly decreased, while levels in muscle fibres and neural progenitors remained high (Figure 5C). This suggests that enzymatic metalloprotease activity observed in cells of the vertebral column is mostly due to Mmp13b, which is consistent with high mmp13b transcript levels observed, e.g., by in situ hybridization (compare Figure 1E). Rankl-induction increased MMP activity in these cells in mmp13b+/+ siblings but not mmp13b−/− mutants (Figures 5D–F). Next, we determined the identity of cells around the notochord that showed elevated enzymatic activity. For this, we performed analysis in transgenic lines expressing mCherry in osx-positive osteoblasts or ctsk-positive osteoclasts. This showed that notochord-lining cells with the highest enzymatic activity were osteoblasts (Figures 5G,G’), while osteoclasts had low levels of enzymatic MMP activity and were located one or 2 cell diameters away or directly adjacent to cells with high MMP activity (case 2 and 3, respectively; yellow arrowheads, Figures 5H,I).
FIGURE 5. Analysis of MMP activity in mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− embryos using DQ collagen in situ zymography. mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− embryos with rankl:HS:cfp/ctsk:mCherry or rankl:HS:cfp/osx:mCherry transgenic background were heat-shocked at 9 dpf and transverse trunk sections were examined for enzymatic metalloprotease activity at 12 dpf. (A) Overview confocal images showing absence of MMP activity in control sections incubated at −20°C. (B) Strong MMP activity in mmp13b+/+ along muscle fibres (asterisks), neural tube (nt), skeletal cells lining the outside of the notochord (white arrows) and chordoblasts (cb) inside the notochord (yellow arrows). (C) Reduced MMP activity in mmp13b−/− mutants in notochord lining cells (white arrow) and chordoblasts (yellow arrow). (D) High-magnification confocal images showing MMP activity under Rankl- conditions. No or little activity is detectable in chordoblasts (yellow arrow) or notochord lining cells (open arrowheads). (E) Increased MMP activity under Rankl + conditions in notochord lining cells (white arrows) and chordoblasts (yellow arrow). (F) mmp13b−/− mutants show similar MMP activity as mmp13+/+ embryos under Rankl- conditions [as in (D)]. (G) MMP activity in notochord lining cells upon Rankl induction is mostly observed in osx:mCherry positive osteoblasts (yellow arrowheads; Case 1). (H,H’) Case 2: No or low MMP activity observed in ctsk:mCherry positive osteoclasts (open arrowheads) but strong activity in cells one to 2 cell diameters away (yellow arrowheads). (I,I’) Case 3: Osteoclast with low MMP activity (open arrowhead) in close contact to cells with high MMP (yellow arrowheads). (G,H,I) show nuclei stained with DAPI, while (G’,H’,I’) only show MMP activity and transgenic reporter expression. Scale bars: 50 μm (A–F), 10 μm (G–I’). More than three larvae from each genotype were used for analysis. The section numbers used for each experiment are listed in Supplementary Table S4.
Together, this strongly suggests that Rankl induction leads to elevated Mmp13b activity primarily in osteoblasts and that it is osteoblast-derived Mmp13b that promotes the maturation of adjacent osteoclasts and triggers their dynamic behavior required for bone remodeling.
Fin Regeneration is Delayed in mmp13b Mutants
RNAseq analysis suggested that among other mmp genes, mmp13b was strongly upregulated in col10a1 expressing osteoblast progenitors in the regenerating caudal fin at 2 dpa (Figure 6A; Supplementary Table S2). RNA in situ hybridization was used to confirm that mmp13b was expressed in osteoblast progenitors along the hemiray segments (Figures 6B,C). We noticed that mmp13b is also expressed in joint cells of the regenerating proximal fins (asterisks in Figure 6B). To assess whether mmp13b is required for fin regeneration, the fins of 2–3-month-old mutant fish were amputated and the length of regenerates were measured at 17 dpa. Compared with wildtype siblings, the regenerate lengths were significantly shorter in homozygous mutants, however the bony fin rays were mineralized normally (Figures 6D,E). Taken together, mmp13b is expressed in osteoblast progenitors of fin ray segments and joints, and its knock-out resulted in delayed fin regeneration in medaka.
FIGURE 6. Delayed fin regeneration in mmp13b mutants at adult stage. (A) Table summarizing mmp13b readcount and fold change values obtained by RNAseq and qPCR analysis, respectively. mmp13b is up-regulated in osteoblast progenitors (col10a1) at 2 dpa compared to 0 dpa. (B) Confocal images of mmp13b in situ hybridization in longitudinal sections from 6 dpa wildtype fins. mmp13b expression is found in osteoblasts in the distal regenerated fin, and osteoblasts and joints (yellow asterisk) in the proximal regenerated fin. Scale bar: 50 μm. (C) Schematic diagram indicating mmp13b expression pattern at the distal and proximal region of a fin regenerate at 6 dpa in a longitudinal view. (D) Representative images of 0 and 17 dpa adult mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− fins. The amputation plane is denoted by a white dotted line. The sixth fin ray is marked by a yellow asterisk. mmp13b−/− mutants show delayed fin regeneration compared to wildtype siblings. Alizarin Red stained fins exhibit normal mineralization of bony structures in adult mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− fins. Scale bar: 1 mm. (E) Quantification of the fin regeneration length at 17 dpa in adult mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− siblings. The regenerated length is defined as the length from the tip to the amputation plane in the sixth fin ray. Error bars indicate mean ± SD, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. unpaired Student’s two-tailed t test.
A mmp13b Deficiency Results in Altered Extracellular Matrix Structure and Reduced Osteoblast Progenitor Numbers in Fin Ray Joints
We next assessed whether a deficiency in mmp13b alters the ECM structure in fins and thereby affects the efficiency of regeneration. We analyzed matrix proteins that are known substrates of Mmp13b, such as collagen 1 (Hayami et al., 2008), collagen 2 (Howes et al., 2014), fibronectin (Zhang et al., 2012), and tenascin-C (Yamamoto et al., 2016), in fin rays of mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− fish at 0 and 2 dpa. In control fins at 0 dpa, no presence of collagen 1 and collagen 2 was detected in joint regions (Figure 7A; empty arrowheads). In contrast, collagen 1 and collagen 2 were strongly expressed in joints of mmp13b−/− fins (Figure 7A; white arrowheads). This suggests that the collagen composition is altered in the joint regions of mmp13b mutants. Also, at 2 dpa, excess collagen 1 and collagen 2 was detectable in homozygous but not wildtype joints. In addition, also fibronectin showed enhanced expression in the bone matrix region in mutant fins (Figure 7A; yellow arrows) at 2 dpa when compared to wildtype (yellow empty arrows). For tenascin-C, in the fibroblast-containing region in the center of the fin ray (yellow box), its distribution appeared to be more aggregated in mmp13b−/− fins compared to mmp13b+/+ fins. Taken together, these findings suggest that a mmp13b deficiency results in an altered ECM composition in fin rays. This includes an excess of matrix proteins especially in the joints, which harbor progenitor cells needed for regeneration (Ando et al., 2017; Dasyani et al., 2019). To examine whether an altered ECM structure in the joints of mmp13b−/− deficient fins affected the number of osteoblast progenitors, we analyzed expression of the progenitor marker col10a1 by in situ hybridization in fins at 6 dpa. This showed that, as reported earlier (Dasyani et al., 2019), col10a1 is expressed in joints of wildtype fins (Figure 7B, blue arrow). In contrast, in mmp13b−/− fins, col10a1 expression in joints was strongly reduced (Figure 7B; blue box, blue arrows). This suggests that the number of col10a1-positive osteoblast progenitors is reduced in the joints of mmp13b deficient mutants.
FIGURE 7. Altered ECM and reduced col10a1 and TRAP expression in mmp13b mutant fins. (A) Confocal images of longitudinal sections from 0 to 2 dpa mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− fins immunostained with collagen 1 (magenta), collagen 2 (yellow), fibronectin (green) and tenascin-C (red). Compared to mmp13b+/+ (hollow white arrows), excess collagen 1 and collagen 2 expression are found in joints in 0 and 2 dpa mmp13b−/− fins (white arrows). Enhanced fibronectin (yellow arrows) in the bone matrix region (between two white dotted lines) and more aggregated tenascin-C in the fibroblast-containing region (yellow box) in 2 dpa mmp13b−/− fins. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Overview and high-magnification confocal images of col10a1 in situ hybridization in longitudinal sections from 6 dpa mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− fins. col10a1 is expressed in joints in mmp13b+/+ but not mmp13b−/− fins (blue arrows). Joints are marked by magenta asterisk in zoom in images. (C) ctsk and trap qPCR in 2 dpa mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− fin samples. Error bars indicate mean ± SD, Student’s two-tailed t test, ***p < 0.001. (D) TRAP staining in longitudinal sections from 2 dpa mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− fins. TRAP positive cells (magenta arrows) are found in mmp13b+/+ blastema, but not in mmp13b−/−. More than three fins from each genotype were used for analysis. Section numbers used for experiment are listed in Supplementary Table S4.
Fin regeneration depends on the recruitment of mpeg1-positive macrophages to the amputation site (Petrie et al., 2014). These macrophages also express tartrate resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) and cathepsin K (ctsk) (Blum and Begemann, 2015). qPCR analysis showed that transcript levels of both trap and ctsk were significantly downregulated in mmp13b−/− fins at 2 dpa (Figure 7C). Consistent with this, also histochemical TRAP staining revealed a reduction or absence of TRAP-positive cells in the regeneration blastema of mmp13b−/− fins, when compared to wildtype (Figure 7D; blue arrowheads). We also analyzed distribution of mpeg1:mCherry/TRAP double-positive cells in regenerating fins at 2 dpa (Supplementary Figure S5). This revealed the presence of both mpeg1/TRAP double-positive cells as well as TRAP-positive/mpeg1-negative cells. We conclude that the latter are osteoclasts that have differentiated from macrophages and that therefore at least a subset of TRAP-positive cells are osteoclasts. Together, this suggests that a deficiency in Mmp13b results in a modified ECM composition in regenerating fins with a concomitant reduction in osteoblast progenitor and macrophage/osteoclast numbers, consequently leading to a delay in fin regeneration.
mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− Double Mutants Exhibit an Osteopetrosis-Like Phenotype in Medaka
Medaka mmp13b−/− mutants develop normally into adulthood with no obvious deficiencies in bone remodeling. This suggests that other Mmps compensate for the loss of Mmp13b, similar to the situation in mice. There, Mmp9−/−;Mmp13−/− double mutants exhibited more severe defects in growth plate formation and bone development compared to the respective single mutants (Stickens et al., 2004). Interestingly, our RNAseq data showed strong expression and up-regulation of mmp9 in osteoblast progenitors and osteoblasts after Rankl induction (Supplementary Table S1). As this opened the possibility of a synergism with mmp13b, we generated mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutants in medaka to identify potential compensatory effects on endogenous bone remodeling. At embryonic stages, mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutants developed normally. However, severe bone defects were observed in adult mutants at 5 months. Alizarin red staining revealed normally mineralized bone in wildtype controls and mmp9−/− as well as mmp13b−/− single mutants. In contrast, mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutants showed an increase of mineralized bone mass in the arches of vertebral bodies (Figure 8A). Transverse views of single vertebral bodies revealed excess bone matrix in the neural arches of mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− mutants, reducing the size of the canal that contains the spinal cord (Figure 8A; black arrow). Also, hemal arches had increased bone mass resulting in an obstruction of the hemal canal and dislocation of blood vessels (Figure 8B; black arrows). This phenotype was likely caused by reduced bone resorbing activity of the normally formed osteoclasts, as evident upon Rankl induction in mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutants (Figures 8C,D; Supplementary Figure S4). Together, this suggests that mmp9 and mmp13b work redundantly and are required for activity of endogenous osteoclasts as well as under osteoporotic conditions. Interestingly, mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutants also showed delays in fin regeneration (Supplementary Figure S5).
FIGURE 8. Excess bone in vertebral arches of mmp9/mmp13b double mutants. (A) High-magnification lateral and transverse views of Alizarin Red stained vertebrae of 5 month-old wildtype siblings (a, b), mmp13b−/− mutants (c, d), mmp9−/− mutants (e, f), and mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutants (g, h). Green and cyan arrows indicate the width of neural and hemal arches, respectively. The diameter of the centra is denoted by yellow arrow. Black arrow indicates excessive mineralized bone matrix in neural arch of mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutant (h). na: neural arch; ce: centra; ha: hemal arch; sc: spinal cord; nc: notochord. Scale bar: 200 μm. (B) Bright field images showing the trunk of wildtype siblings and mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− mutant at 5 months. Ectopic blood vessel formation is denoted by black arrows. Scale bar: 2 mm. (C) Overview and high-magnification confocal images of calcein stained mineralized matrix in Rankl transgenic controls and mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/− siblings at 3 days after Rankl induction (3 dphs; 12 dpf). Control siblings but not homozygous mutants show enhanced resorption of mineralized matrix at neural arches (yellow arrowheads) and vertebral bodies (white arrows). (D) Quantification of bone lesions in vertebral column and neural arch [region marked as white boxes in (C)] in controls and mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/− siblings at 3 dphs. +/+: N = 8, mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/−: N = 13. Error bars indicate mean ± SD, **p < 0.01, unpaired Student’s two-tailed t test. Scale bar: 1 mm (overview images), 100 μm (zoom in images).
Discussion
Osteoblast and osteoclast activities during bone remodeling require coordinated control to achieve homeostasis and prevent the loss of bone mineral density. Various signaling pathways have been identified that control bone cell interactions (Nakashima et al., 2002; Luo et al., 2016; Phan et al., 2020b). Besides communication through cell signaling, contact-dependent cell activation also occurs through alteration of structural components of the ECM (Delaissé et al., 2003; reviewed by Paiva and Granjeiro, 2014; reviewed by Pedersen et al., 2015). In our study, we characterized the matrix metalloprotease Mmp13b in medaka and showed that it is required for osteoclast maturation and determines the morphology and dynamics of osteoclasts under osteoporotic conditions. In addition, Mmp13b also controls the composition of ECM during fin regeneration and contributes to the recruitment of progenitor cells to regenerating tissue.
Osteoblast-Derived Mmp13b Regulates Osteoclast Driven Resorption in a Non-cell Autonomous Manner
Transcriptome profiling of bone cells under osteoporotic conditions revealed that two mmp13 orthologs, mmp13 (ENSORLG00000020553) and mmp13b (ENSORLG00000014453) are expressed in medaka. The zebrafish genome also has two mmp13 genes, mmp13a (ENSDARG00000012395) and mmp13b (ENSDARG00000100794). Earlier studies have focused on mmp13a, as mmp13b is expressed at low levels and transcripts cannot be detected by qPCR (Zhang et al., 2017) or in situ hybridization (Li et al., 2020). Zhang et al. (2017) reported that mmp13a was up-regulated in atp6v1h-deficient zebrafish that have an osteoporosis-like phenotype suggesting a potential role in bone resorption.
In medaka, on the other hand, mmp13a (annotated as mmp13 in ENSEMBL, see above) showed low expression levels in osteoblasts and was not differentially regulated upon Rankl induction (Supplementary Table S1). Therefore, we focused our study on mmp13b and investigated its function in bone formation and remodeling. RNA in situ hybridization confirmed that mmp13b is expressed in osteoblast progenitors and osteoblasts. In addition, in situ zymography confirmed strongly elevated MMP enzymatic activity in osteoblasts upon Rankl induction. The MMP activity was strongly reduced in mmp13b mutants. Together, this suggests that osteoblast progenitors and osteoblasts produce enzymatically active Mmp13b.
Its expression in osteoblasts could reflect a possible role for Mmp13b in bone formation. Such a role was previously shown in mice where Mmp13 is expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes and osteoblasts and contributes to endochondral bone ossification and fracture healing (Yamagiwa et al., 1999; Stickens et al., 2004). In Mmp13−/− mice, hypertrophic chondrocytes exhibited a delayed exit from the growth plate and accumulated in a terminally differentiated state, leading to an expanded hypertrophic chondrocyte zone (Inada et al., 2004; Stickens et al., 2004). In addition, osteoblast-derived Mmp13 is responsible for proper cartilage degradation and its inactivation results in increased trabecular bone in mice (Stickens et al., 2004). Beyond normal bone development, Mmp13 also promoted fracture healing through degrading cartilage ECM components, such as aggrecan (Kosaki et al., 2007). In our study, however, mmp13b mutant embryos developed normally suggesting that this matrix metalloprotease is dispensable for normal bone formation. Other Mmps could compensate for the loss of mmp13b in bone formation. Interestingly, however, mmp9, which among other mmp genes, was the most strongly expressed and upregulated in osteoblasts under osteoporotic conditions (Supplementary Table S1), does not appear to compensate for the loss of mmp13b in bone formation. Medaka mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutant embryos developed normally suggesting that these proteases are not required for regular bone formation. Instead, mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutants exhibited severely increased bone mass in the vertebral bodies at 5 months, with an obstruction of neural and hemal canals in the vertebral arches leading to a dislocation of blood vessels. This high bone mass phenotype is intriguingly similar to the osteopetrosis-like symptoms that we had earlier reported for an osteoclast-deficient medaka model (To et al., 2015). This thus strongly suggests that mmp9 and mmp13b act synergistically to control the activity of endogenous osteoclasts and control bone remodeling at adult stages.
Medaka mmp13b single mutants instead showed defects under osteoporosis-like conditions. After Rankl induction, ectopic osteoclast formed normally but bone resorption was reduced in mmp13b−/− mutants, and this reduction could be recapitulated by chemical Mmp13 inhibition. This strongly suggests that Mmp13b plays a critical role in osteoclast activation under osteoporotic conditions. The role of Mmp13 in regulating osteoclast differentiation and resorption has been studied in various tumor models. For example, MMP13 was found to be induced in breast tumors (Freije et al., 1994), where its up-regulation at the interface between tumor tissue and bone matrix contributed to bone metastasis through promoting osteoclast differentiation (Nannuru et al., 2010; Pivetta et al., 2011). Another study showed that myeloma-derived MMP13 regulates the fusion of osteoclasts and bone resorption (Fu et al., 2016). This shows that MMP13 produced by tumor cells activates osteoclasts and promotes bone metastasis.
In medaka, we demonstrated that the maturation of osteoclasts depends on Mmp13b. We analyzed ten known osteoclast-relevant genes that were earlier shown to be upregulated when macrophages differentiate into mature osteoclasts (Phan et al., 2020a). In mmp13b mutants, these genes were down-regulated after Rankl induction while il10, a known osteoclast inhibitor (Evans and Fox, 2007; Zhang et al., 2014) was up-regulated. Together, this strongly suggests that Mmp13b is required for the maturation of osteoclasts under osteoporosis-like conditions. However, the observation that trap, a well-established osteoclast marker (Andersson and Marks, 1989), was up-regulated indicates that osteoclast differentiation was not entirely blocked in mmp13b mutants, although bone resorption was strongly reduced.
Also, the morphology of osteoclasts was affected in mmp13b mutants. Osteoclasts showed a larger sphericity in mmp13b−/− mutants when compared to wildtype, which could reflect the more immature state of these cells. In addition, also the size or surface area of osteoclasts was affected in mmp13b mutants. In wildtype embryos, ctsk-positive osteoclasts were found to exhibit three distinct size ranges, which we defined as immature (cluster 1), mono-nucleated (cluster 2) or multi-nucleated osteoclasts (cluster 3). Importantly, in mmp13b mutants, a fourth size range (cluster 4) was detected, which was similar to cluster 1 and consistent with the idea that these cells were immature. Finally, also the motility of ctsk cells was affected in mmp13b mutants. In wildtype siblings, osteoclasts exhibit a dynamic motility pattern, with a relatively fast speed (approx. 8 nm/s) in the first 1.5 h of the time-lapse analysis (around 48–49.5 hphs), which is consistent to earlier reports (Phan et al., 2020a), followed by a slowing down to a consistent speed of approx. 2 nm/s. This change in speed might reflect the transition of an immature osteoclast approaching the vertebral column to a differentiated osteoclast making contact to mineralized matrix (Phan et al., 2020a). In mmp13b mutants, on the other hand, no elevated speed was observed suggesting possible deficiencies in motility of the immature osteoclasts. In conclusion, our findings on expression profiles, sphericity, size and motility strongly suggest that osteoclasts fail to fully mature in mmp13b mutants.
Similar osteoclast defects were observed in medaka embryos treated with the MMP13 inhibitor CL-82198 hydrochloride, which had earlier been used for the treatment of osteoarthritis (Wang et al., 2013). These inhibitor experiments thus confirmed our mutant analysis and demonstrate that the medaka model can be used for future screening of compounds that interfere with Mmp13 activity to potentially prevent osteoporosis or tumor-caused osteolysis.
In mammals, MMP13 has similar activities in osteocytes and osteoblasts. In both cell types, MMP13 activity is required to remove and remodel the surrounding ECM. On the other hand, our study suggests that in the anosteocytic bone of medaka, osteoblast-derived Mmp13b in addition functions in a non-cell autonomous manner to activate osteoclasts. Whether in osteocyte-inhabited bone, osteocyte-derived MMP13 plays similar roles in osteoclast activation remains to be investigated.
Mmp13b Controls Extracellular Matrix Remodeling During Medaka Fin Ray Regeneration
Comparing the transcriptome profiles of osteoblasts during bone remodeling under osteoporosis-like conditions and fin regeneration, we identified a significant up-regulation of mmp13b in col10a1 positive osteoblast progenitors. These col10a1 cells contribute substantially to the regeneration of fin ray segments and joints in medaka (Dasyani et al., 2019). RNA in situ hybridization confirmed mmp13b expression in osteoblasts of segments and fin ray joints. Earlier studies had reported the important role of joint cells in fin regeneration. In zebrafish, mmp9-expressing joint cells represent a progenitor pool for fin regeneration (Ando et al., 2017). Like the situation in mmp9 mutant zebrafish, in our study, we also observed delayed fin regeneration in medaka mmp13b−/− single and mmp9−/−;mmp13b−/− double mutants. While being expressed in osteoblast progenitors, we propose a direct role for Mmp13b protein in generating an ECM environment that promotes regeneration.
Mmp13 has earlier been implicated in regeneration processes, including skeletal (Behonick et al., 2007), muscle (Lei et al., 2013), heart (Xu et al., 2018), and fin regeneration (Li et al., 2020). In zebrafish, a knock-down of mmp13a resulted in delayed fin growth and impaired osteoblast differentiation (Li et al., 2020). Hence, our findings in stable mmp13b knock-out medaka mutants are consistent with morpholino-based findings in zebrafish.
During fin regeneration, the ECM in the blastema is undergoing extensive remodeling and different matrix proteins are dynamically produced and degraded to generate a distinct ECM environment (Mercer et al., 2012; Govindan and Iovine, 2015). For example, hyaluronic acid (HA), fibronectin (FN) and tenascin C (TNC) are up-regulated to form a transitional matrix for cell proliferation and differentiation during early regeneration stages (Calve et al., 2010). On the other hand, collagen expression is rapidly reduced (Govindan and Iovine, 2015). In our study, we analyzed expression levels and distribution of collagen 1, collagen 2, fibronectin, and tenascin-C in the regenerating fin rays. We found that in regenerating wildtype fins at two stages (0 and 2 dpa), almost no collagen 1 and collagen 2 protein was detectable in the joint regions. This contrasted with mmp13b mutants, where excess collagen 1 and collagen 2 was observed in joints, suggesting impaired collagen degradation when Mmp13b activity is reduced. Two matrix proteins important for the transitional ECM, fibronectin and tenascin-C, also exhibited altered distribution in wildtype siblings and mmp13b mutants. At 2 dpa, fibronectin was upregulated in both wildtype and mmp13b mutants when compared to 0 dpa (data not shown). However, compared to wildtype where fibronectin was found along bone lining osteoblasts, enhanced fibronectin levels were observed in the bone matrix region in mmp13b mutants. Finally, tenascin-C appeared more aggregated in the fibroblast-containing region of mmp13b mutants when compared to wildtype. In addition to these ECM changes, we also observed reduced numbers of col10a1-positive osteoblast progenitors in newly formed joint regions of mutants. Insufficient numbers of progenitors in the joint regions are expected to delay fin regeneration, as joints have been identified as the reservoir of cells needed for fin regeneration (Ando et al., 2017). Together, we hypothesize that Mmp13b is needed to remodel the ECM and allow recruitment of osteoblast progenitors to the joints where they are needed for regeneration.
The initial phases of fin regeneration in zebrafish depend on the recruitment of macrophages (Nguyen-Chi et al., 2017), while at later stages TRAP-positive osteoclasts are detected in the regenerating fins where they contribute to remodeling (Blum and Begemann, 2015; Ando et al., 2017). In our study, we also observed TRAP-positive cells in the regenerating fins at an early stage. While we are unable to distinguish whether these TRAP-positive cells represent macrophages or osteoclasts, no such cells were observed in mmp13b mutants. We thus conclude that remodeling the ECM through Mmp13b is not only required for recruitment of osteoblasts but also of other cell types needed for regeneration.
In conclusion, our study using transcriptome profiling in a medaka model has identified Mmp13b as an important regulator needed for ECM remodeling during tissue regeneration and for maturation of osteoclasts during osteoporotic conditions. The fact that mmp13b was found strongly expressed in osteoblast progenitors in both situations implies interesting scenarios involving cell autonomous and non-cell autonomous roles, respectively. While in regeneration, mmp13b-positive osteoblasts seem to remodel the ECM to attract more osteoblasts into the joint regions, under osteoporotic conditions, osteoblast-derived Mmp13b controls maturation of osteoclasts. Whether the latter is also through ECM remodeling or alternatively through proteolytic activation of other factors needed for osteoclast maturation, remains to be analyzed.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in the study are deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive repository, accession number PRJNA767186.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the IACUC of National University of Singapore (protocol numbers: BR19-0120, R18-0562).
Author Contributions
RL, NI, LE, TC, and CW contributed to conception and design of the study. RL and CW wrote the first draft of the manuscript. RL, NI and LE performed experiments, generated data and prepared the figures. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This project is supported by grants from the Singapore Ministry of Education (No. MOE2016-T2-2-086) and the National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF; NRF2017-NRF-ISF002-2671).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank the CBIS confocal unit and the DBS fish facility for continued support.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2022.775512/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure S1 | Transcriptome profiles of medaka osteoblast progenitors in 0 and 2 dpa fins. (A) Venn diagram showing the total number of genes expressed in col10a1-positive osteoblast progenitors in 0 and 2 dpa fins, with the overlapping region showing commonly expressed genes. (B) Volcano plot showing up- and downregulated genes in osteoblast progenitors at 2 dpa compared with 0 dpa with adjusted p values <0.05 (p adj value <0.05). Insignificantly regulated genes are shown as blue dots. (C) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) showing significantly enriched categories including extracellular matrix-receptor interaction (red box). KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; q value, adjusted p value.
Supplementary Figure S2 | Generation of mmp13b mutants. Generation of mmp13b CRISPR/Cas9 mutants using three guide RNAs (gRNA1-3) targeting exon 2 (E2), exon 3 (E3) and exon 6 (E6). Magenta arrows indicate position of forward (FP) and reverse (RP) primers for PCR genotyping [WT (+/+): 1250 bp; homozygous mutants (−/−): 816 bp; heterozygous carriers (+/−): 1250 bp and 816 bp]. Mutants have a 434 bp deletion (yellow) between gRNA2 and gRNA3 target sites, leading to a predicted prematurely truncated aa sequence (red).
Supplementary Figure S3 | Presence of TRAP-positive cells upon Rankl induction in mmp13b−/− mutants. TRAP staining on transverse sections of trunk of 12 dpf mmp13b+/+ and mmp13b−/− mutants with ctsk:mCherry transgenic background after Rankl induction. Normal formation but uneven distribution (hollow arrow) of TRAP-positive cells in mmp13b−/− mutants compared to mmp13b+/+. More than three larvae of each genotype were used for cryosectioning. Section numbers: mmp13b+/+: N=23; mmp13b−/−: N=30. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Supplementary Figure S4 | mmp9/mmp13b double mutants show normal osteoclast formation after Rankl induction. Overview and high-magnification confocal images of controls (+/+) and mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/− double mutants in rankl:HS:cfp/ctsk:mCherry transgenic background at 2 dphs (11 dpf). Similar osteoclast formation in +/+ and mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/− at 2 dphs.
Supplementary Figure S5 | Distribution of mpeg1:mCherry and TRAP-positive cells in regenerating fins at 2 dpa. Caudal fins of 3 month-old adult medaka with mpeg1:mCherry transgenic background were amputated and 2 dpa fins were collected for TRAP staining. Overview fluorescence images (A,E) showing presence of mpeg1-positive macrophages in blastema before TRAP staining. Zoom in images [of areas indicated by white boxes in (A,E)] showing TRAP-positive cells (C,G) and mCherry-positive cells before (B,F) and after (D,H) TRAP staining. White and cyan arrowheads show mpeg1-positive and mpeg1/TRAP double positive cells, respectively. Blue arrows indicate TRAP-positive but mpeg1-negative cells. Scale bar: 50 μm (A,E), 25 μm (B–D, F–H).
Supplementary Figure S6 | mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/− double mutants exhibit mild but distinct delay in fin regeneration at 17 dpa. (A) Representative images of fins at 17 dpa in adult wildtype controls (+/+) and mmp9-/-; mmp13b−/− double mutants. The amputation plane is denoted by a red dotted line. mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/− mutants show delayed fin regeneration compared to wildtype siblings. Scale bar: 1 mm. (B) Quantification of the fin regeneration length at 17 dpa in adult +/+ and mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/− siblings. The regenerated length is defined as the length from the tip to the amputation plane in the 6th fin ray. +/+: N=11, mmp9−/−; mmp13b−/−: N=8. Error bars indicate mean ± SD, **p < 0.01, unpaired Student’s two-tailed t test.
Supplementary Movie S1 | Time-lapse analysis of osteoclast dynamics in wildtype siblings. Larvae with rankl:HS:cfp/ctsk:mCherry transgenic background were heat-shocked at 9 dpf (2 h, 39°C) and time-lapse imaging started at 48 hphs. Osteoclasts show dynamic morphology. Scale bar: 50 μm. Time: hh:mm:ss. Frame rate: 10 fps.
Supplementary Movie S2 | Time lapse analysis of osteoclast dynamics in mmp13b−/− mutants. Mutants with rankl:HS:cfp/ctsk:mCherry transgenic background were heat-shocked at 9 dpf (2 h, 39°C) and time-lapse imaging started at 48 hphs. Osteoclasts in mutants exhibit altered morphology and dynamics. Scale bar: 50 μm. Time: hh:mm:ss. Frame rate: 10 fps.
References
Alford, A. I., Kozloff, K. M., and Hankenson, K. D. (2015). Extracellular Matrix Networks in Bone Remodeling. Int. J. Biochem. Cel Biol. 65, 20–31. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2015.05.008
Andersen, T. L., del Carmen Ovejero, M., Kirkegaard, T., Lenhard, T., Foged, N. T., and Delaissé, J.-M. (2004). A Scrutiny of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Osteoclasts: Evidence for Heterogeneity and for the Presence of MMPs Synthesized by Other Cells. Bone 35, 1107–1119. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2004.06.019
Andersson, G. N., and Marks, S. C. (1989). Tartrate-resistant Acid ATPase as a Cytochemical Marker for Osteoclasts. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 37, 115–117. doi:10.1177/37.1.2461980
Ando, K., Shibata, E., Hans, S., Brand, M., and Kawakami, A. (2017). Osteoblast Production by Reserved Progenitor Cells in Zebrafish Bone Regeneration and Maintenance. Develop. Cel 43, 643–650. e643. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2017.10.015
Bai, S., Thummel, R., Godwin, A., Nagase, H., Itoh, Y., Li, L., et al. (2005). Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression and Function during Fin Regeneration in Zebrafish: Analysis of MT1-MMP, MMP2 and TIMP2. Matrix Biol. 24, 247–260. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2005.03.007
Behonick, D. J., Xing, Z., Lieu, S., Buckley, J. M., Lotz, J. C., Marcucio, R. S., et al. (2007). Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase 13 in Both Endochondral and Intramembranous Ossification during Skeletal Regeneration. PLOS ONE 2, e1150. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001150
Blair, H. C., Larrouture, Q. C., Li, Y., Lin, H., Beer-Stoltz, D., Liu, L., et al. (2016). Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Matrix Formation In Vivo and In Vitro. Tissue Eng. Part. B Rev. 23, 268–280. doi:10.1089/ten.TEB.2016.0454
Blum, N., and Begemann, G. (2015). Osteoblast De- and Redifferentiation Are Controlled by a Dynamic Response to Retinoic Acid during Zebrafish Fin Regeneration. Development 142, 2894–2903. doi:10.1242/dev.120204
Boyle, W. J., Simonet, W. S., and Lacey, D. L. (2003). Osteoclast Differentiation and Activation. Nature 423, 337–342. doi:10.1038/nature01658
Buettner, A., Sundaram, S., Vyas, H., Yu, T., Mathavan, S., and Winkler, C. (2018). Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting (FACS) of Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts for RNA Sequencing in a Medaka, Oryzias latipes (Temming & Schlegel, 1846), Osteoporosis Model. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 34, 481–488. doi:10.1111/jai.13660
Calve, S., Odelberg, S. J., and Simon, H.-G. (2010). A Transitional Extracellular Matrix Instructs Cell Behavior during Muscle Regeneration. Develop. Biol. 344, 259–271. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.007
Dasyani, M., Tan, W. H., Sundaram, S., Imangali, N., Centanin, L., Wittbrodt, J., et al. (2019). Lineage Tracing of Col10a1 Cells Identifies Distinct Progenitor Populations for Osteoblasts and Joint Cells in the Regenerating Fin of Medaka (Oryzias latipes). Develop. Biol. 455, 85–99. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.07.012
Delaissé, J.-M., Andersen, T. L., Engsig, M. T., Henriksen, K., Troen, T., and Blavier, L. (2003). Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMP) and Cathepsin K Contribute Differently to Osteoclastic Activities. Microsc. Res. Tech. 61, 504–513. doi:10.1002/jemt.10374
Evans, K. E., and Fox, S. W. (2007). Interleukin-10 Inhibits Osteoclastogenesis by Reducing NFATc1 Expression and Preventing its Translocation to the Nucleus. BMC Cel Biol 8, 4. doi:10.1186/1471-2121-8-4
Ethiraj, L. P., Lei Samuel, F. E., Liu, R., Winkler, C., and Carney, T. J. (2021). Colorimetric and Fluorescent TRAP Assays for Visualising and Quantifying Fish Osteoclast Activity. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/2021.12.10.472045
Fakhry, M., Hamade, E., Badran, B., Buchet, R., and Magne, D. (2013). Molecular Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation towards Osteoblasts. Wjsc 5, 136–148. doi:10.4252/wjsc.v5.i4.136
Feng, X., and McDonald, J. M. (2011). Disorders of Bone Remodeling. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 6, 121–145. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130203
Freije, J. M., Díez-Itza, I., Balbín, M., Sánchez, L. M., Blasco, R., Tolivia, J., et al. (1994). Molecular Cloning and Expression of Collagenase-3, a Novel Human Matrix Metalloproteinase Produced by Breast Carcinomas. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16766–16773. doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)89457-7
Fu, J., Li, S., Feng, R., Ma, H., Sabeh, F., Roodman, G. D., et al. (2016). Multiple Myeloma-Derived MMP-13 Mediates Osteoclast Fusogenesis and Osteolytic Disease. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 1759–1772. doi:10.1172/jci80276
Furuya, M., Kikuta, J., Fujimori, S., Seno, S., Maeda, H., Shirazaki, M., et al. (2018). Direct Cell-Cell Contact between Mature Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts Dynamically Controls Their Functions In Vivo. Nat. Commun. 9, 300. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02541-w
Govindan, J., and Iovine, M. K. (2015). Dynamic Remodeling of the Extra Cellular Matrix during Zebrafish Fin Regeneration. Gene Expr. Patterns 19, 21–29. doi:10.1016/j.gep.2015.06.001
Hadjidakis, D. J., and Androulakis, I. I. (2006). Bone Remodeling. Ann. N.Y Acad. Sci. 1092, 385–396. doi:10.1196/annals.1365.035
Hardy, E., and Fernandez-Patron, C. (2020). Destroy to Rebuild: The Connection between Bone Tissue Remodeling and Matrix Metalloproteinases. Front. Physiol. 11, 47. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00047
Hayami, T., Kapila, Y. L., and Kapila, S. (2008). MMP-1 (Collagenase-1) and MMP-13 (Collagenase-3) Differentially Regulate Markers of Osteoblastic Differentiation in Osteogenic Cells. Matrix Biol. 27, 682–692. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2008.07.005
Howes, J.-M., Bihan, D., Slatter, D. A., Hamaia, S. W., Packman, L. C., Knauper, V., et al. (2014). The Recognition of Collagen and Triple-Helical Toolkit Peptides by MMP-13. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 24091–24101. doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.583443
Inada, M., Wang, Y., Byrne, M. H., Rahman, M. U., Miyaura, C., López-Otín, C., et al. (2004). Critical Roles for Collagenase-3 (Mmp13) in Development of Growth Plate Cartilage and in Endochondral Ossification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 17192–17197. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407788101
Jáuregui, E. J., Akil, O., Acevedo, C., Hall-Glenn, F., Tsai, B. S., Bale, H. A., et al. (2016). Parallel Mechanisms Suppress Cochlear Bone Remodeling to Protect Hearing. Bone 89, 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2016.04.010
Knopf, F., Hammond, C., Chekuru, A., Kurth, T., Hans, S., Weber, C. W., et al. (2011). Bone Regenerates via Dedifferentiation of Osteoblasts in the Zebrafish Fin. Develop. Cel 20, 713–724. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.04.014
Kosaki, N., Takaishi, H., Kamekura, S., Kimura, T., Okada, Y., Minqi, L., et al. (2007). Impaired Bone Fracture Healing in Matrix Metalloproteinase-13 Deficient Mice. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 354, 846–851. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.234
Lei, H., Leong, D., Smith, L. R., and Barton, E. R. (2013). Matrix Metalloproteinase 13 Is a New Contributor to Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Critical for Myoblast Migration. Am. J. Physiology-Cell Physiol. 305, C529–C538. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00051.2013
Li, L., Zhang, J., and Akimenko, M. A. (2020). Inhibition Ofmmp13aduring Zebrafish Fin Regeneration Disrupts Fin Growth, Osteoblasts Differentiation, and Laminin Organization. Develop. Dyn. 249, 187–198. doi:10.1002/dvdy.112
Luo, J., Yang, Z., Ma, Y., Yue, Z., Lin, H., Qu, G., et al. (2016). LGR4 Is a Receptor for RANKL and Negatively Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Bone Resorption. Nat. Med. 22, 539–546. doi:10.1038/nm.4076
McMillan, S. C., Zhang, J., Phan, H. E., Jeradi, S., Probst, L., Hammerschmidt, M., et al. (2018). A Regulatory Pathway Involving Retinoic Acid and Calcineurin Demarcates and Maintains Joint Cells and Osteoblasts in Regenerating Fin. Development 145, dev161158. doi:10.1242/dev.161158
Mercer, S. E., Cheng, C.-H., Atkinson, D. L., Krcmery, J., Guzman, C. E., Kent, D. T., et al. (2012). Multi-Tissue Microarray Analysis Identifies a Molecular Signature of Regeneration. PLOS ONE 7, e52375. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052375
Moharrer, Y., and Boerckel, J. D. (2021). Tunnels in the Rock: Dynamics of Osteocyte Morphogenesis. Bone 153, 116104. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2021.116104
Mosig, R. A., Dowling, O., DiFeo, A., Ramirez, M. C. M., Parker, I. C., Abe, E., et al. (2007). Loss of MMP-2 Disrupts Skeletal and Craniofacial Development and Results in Decreased Bone Mineralization, Joint Erosion and Defects in Osteoblast and Osteoclast Growth. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16, 1113–1123. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm060
Nakashima, K., Zhou, X., Kunkel, G., Zhang, Z., Deng, J. M., Behringer, R. R., et al. (2002). The Novel Zinc finger-containing Transcription Factor Osterix Is Required for Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Formation. Cell 108, 17–29. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00622-5
Nannuru, K. C., Futakuchi, M., Varney, M. L., Vincent, T. M., Marcusson, E. G., and Singh, R. K. (2010). Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)-13 Regulates Mammary Tumor-Induced Osteolysis by Activating MMP9 and Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling at the Tumor-Bone Interface. Cancer Res. 70, 3494–3504. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-3251
Ng, P. Y., Brigitte Patricia Ribet, A., and Pavlos, N. J. (2019). Membrane Trafficking in Osteoclasts and Implications for Osteoporosis. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 47, 639–650. doi:10.1042/bst20180445
Nguyen-Chi, M., Laplace-Builhé, B., Travnickova, J., Luz-Crawford, P., Tejedor, G., Lutfalla, G., et al. (2017). TNF Signaling and Macrophages Govern Fin Regeneration in Zebrafish Larvae. Cell Death Dis 8, e2979. doi:10.1038/cddis.2017.374
Ofer, L., Dean, M. N., Zaslansky, P., Kult, S., Shwartz, Y., Zaretsky, J., et al. (2019). A Novel Nonosteocytic Regulatory Mechanism of Bone Modeling. Plos Biol. 17, e3000140. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000140
Paiva, K. B. S., and Granjeiro, J. M. (2014). Bone Tissue Remodeling and Development: Focus on Matrix Metalloproteinase Functions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 561, 74–87. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2014.07.034
Paiva, K. B. S., and Granjeiro, J. M. (2017). “Matrix Metalloproteinases in Bone Resorption, Remodeling, and Repair,” in Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. Editor R.A. Khalil (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press), 203–303.
Pedersen, M. E., Vuong, T. T., Rønning, S. B., and Kolset, S. O. (2015). Matrix Metalloproteinases in Fish Biology and Matrix Turnover. Matrix Biol. 44-46, 86–93. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2015.01.009
Petrie, T. A., Strand, N. S., Tsung-Yang, C., Rabinowitz, J. S., and Moon, R. T. (2014). Macrophages Modulate Adult Zebrafish Tail Fin Regeneration. Development 141, 2581–2591. doi:10.1242/dev.098459
Phan, Q. T., Liu, R., Tan, W. H., Imangali, N., Cheong, B., Schartl, M., et al. (2020a). Macrophages Switch to an Osteo-Modulatory Profile upon RANKL Induction in a Medaka (Oryzias latipes) Osteoporosis Model. JBMR Plus 4, e10409. doi:10.1002/jbm4.10409
Phan, Q. T., Tan, W. H., Liu, R., Sundaram, S., Buettner, A., Kneitz, S., et al. (2020b). Cxcl9l and Cxcr3.2 Regulate Recruitment of Osteoclast Progenitors to Bone Matrix in a Medaka Osteoporosis Model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19276–19286. doi:10.1073/pnas.2006093117
Pivetta, E., Scapolan, M., Pecolo, M., Wassermann, B., Abu-Rumeileh, I., Balestreri, L., et al. (2011). MMP-13 Stimulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Activation in Tumour Breast Bone Metastases. Breast Cancer Res. 13, R105. doi:10.1186/bcr3047
Raggatt, L. J., and Partridge, N. C. (2010). Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Bone Remodeling. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 25103–25108. doi:10.1074/jbc.r109.041087
Renn, J., Büttner, A., To, T. T., Chan, S. J. H., and Winkler, C. (2013). A col10a1:nlGFP Transgenic Line Displays Putative Osteoblast Precursors at the Medaka Notochordal Sheath Prior to Mineralization. Develop. Biol. 381, 134–143. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.05.030
Renn, J., and Winkler, C. (2009). Osterix-mCherry Transgenic Medaka for In Vivo Imaging of Bone Formation. Dev. Dyn. 238, 241–248. doi:10.1002/dvdy.21836
Salo, J., Lehenkari, P., Mulari, M., Metsikkö, K., and Väänänen, H. K. (1997). Removal of Osteoclast Bone Resorption Products by Transcytosis. Science 276, 270–273. doi:10.1126/science.276.5310.270
Sehring, I. M., and Weidinger, G. (2020). Recent Advancements in Understanding Fin Regeneration in Zebrafish. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 9, e367. doi:10.1002/wdev.367
Singh, S. P., Holdway, J. E., and Poss, K. D. (2012). Regeneration of Amputated Zebrafish Fin Rays from De Novo Osteoblasts. Develop. Cel 22, 879–886. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.006
Stemmer, M., Thumberger, T., del Sol Keyer, M., Wittbrodt, J., and Mateo, J. L. (2015). CCTop: An Intuitive, Flexible and Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 Target Prediction Tool. PLOS ONE 10, e0124633. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124633
Stickens, D., Behonick, D. J., Ortega, N., Heyer, B., Hartenstein, B., Yu, Y., et al. (2004). Altered Endochondral Bone Development in Matrix Metalloproteinase 13-deficient Mice. Development 131, 5883–5895. doi:10.1242/dev.01461
To, T. T., Witten, P. E., Huysseune, A., and Winkler, C. (2015). An Adult Osteopetrosis Model in Medaka Reveals the Importance of Osteoclast Function for Bone Remodeling in Teleost Fish. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 178, 68–75. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2015.08.007
To, T. T., Witten, P. E., Renn, J., Bhattacharya, D., Huysseune, A., and Winkler, C. (2012). Rankl-induced Osteoclastogenesis Leads to Loss of Mineralization in a Medaka Osteoporosis Model. Development 139, 141–150. doi:10.1242/dev.071035
Wang, M., Sampson, E. R., Jin, H., Li, J., Ke, Q. H., Im, H.-J., et al. (2013). MMP13 Is a Critical Target Gene during the Progression of Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 15, R5. doi:10.1186/ar4133
Xu, S., Webb, S. E., Lau, T. C. K., and Cheng, S. H. (2018). Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) Mediate Leukocyte Recruitment during the Inflammatory Phase of Zebrafish Heart Regeneration. Sci. Rep. 8, 7199. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25490-w
Yamagiwa, H., Tokunaga, K., Hayami, T., Hatano, H., Uchida, M., Endo, N., et al. (1999). Expression of Metalloproteinase-13 (Collagenase-3) Is Induced during Fracture Healing in Mice. Bone 25, 197–203. doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00157-x
Yamamoto, K., Okano, H., Miyagawa, W., Visse, R., Shitomi, Y., Santamaria, S., et al. (2016). MMP-13 Is Constitutively Produced in Human Chondrocytes and Co-endocytosed with ADAMTS-5 and TIMP-3 by the Endocytic Receptor LRP1. Matrix Biol. 56, 57–73. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2016.03.007
Zhang, Q., Chen, B., Yan, F., Guo, J., Zhu, X., Ma, S., et al. (20142014). Interleukin-10 Inhibits Bone Resorption: a Potential Therapeutic Strategy in Periodontitis and Other Bone Loss Diseases. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 284836. doi:10.1155/2014/284836
Zhang, X., Chen, C. T., Bhargava, M., and Torzilli, P. A. (2012). A Comparative Study of Fibronectin Cleavage by MMP-1, -3, -13, and -14. CARTILAGE 3, 267–277. doi:10.1177/1947603511435273
Zhang, Y., Huang, H., Zhao, G., Yokoyama, T., Vega, H., Huang, Y., et al. (2017). ATP6V1H Deficiency Impairs Bone Development through Activation of MMP9 and MMP13. Plos Genet. 13, e1006481. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006481
Keywords: osteoblasts, osteoclasts, matrix metalloprotease, medaka (Oryzias lapites), osteoporosis
Citation: Liu R, Imangali N, Ethiraj LP, Carney TJ and Winkler C (2022) Transcriptome Profiling of Osteoblasts in a Medaka (Oryzias latipes) Osteoporosis Model Identifies Mmp13b as Crucial for Osteoclast Activation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:775512. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.775512
Received: 14 September 2021; Accepted: 14 January 2022;
Published: 21 February 2022.
Edited by:
Ela W. Knapik, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United StatesReviewed by:
Katharina Jähn-Rickert, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, GermanyMegan Weivoda, University of Michigan, United States
Copyright © 2022 Liu, Imangali, Ethiraj, Carney and Winkler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Christoph Winkler, ZGJzd2N3QG51cy5lZHUuc2c=