Jorge Ibañez-Vega1†
Felipe Del Valle1†Juan José Sáez1Fanny Guzman2
Jheimmy Diaz1Andrea Soza3,4*María Isabel Yuseff1*
- 1Departamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- 2Núcleo Biotecnología Curauma, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
- 3Centro de Biología Celular y Biomedicina, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile
- 4Centro de Envejecimiento y Regeneración (CARE), Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
The formation of an immune synapse (IS) enables B cells to capture membrane-tethered antigens, where cortical actin cytoskeleton remodeling regulates cell spreading and depletion of F-actin at the centrosome promotes the recruitment of lysosomes to facilitate antigen extraction. How B cells regulate both pools of actin, remains poorly understood. We report here that decreased F-actin at the centrosome and IS relies on the distribution of the proteasome, regulated by Ecm29. Silencing Ecm29 decreases the proteasome pool associated to the centrosome of B cells and shifts its accumulation to the cell cortex and IS. Accordingly, Ecm29-silenced B cells display increased F-actin at the centrosome, impaired centrosome and lysosome repositioning to the IS and defective antigen extraction and presentation. Ecm29-silenced B cells, which accumulate higher levels of proteasome at the cell cortex, display decreased actin retrograde flow in lamellipodia and enhanced spreading responses. Our findings support a model where B the asymmetric distribution of the proteasome, mediated by Ecm29, coordinates actin dynamics at the centrosome and the IS, promoting lysosome recruitment and cell spreading.
Introduction
The interaction of the B cell receptor (BCR) with membrane-tethered antigens (mAg) initiates the formation of an immune synapse (IS), characterized by rapid cortical actin cytoskeleton rearrangements and the formation of BCR-microclusters containing signaling molecules that elicit B cell activation (Yuseff et al., 2013; Kwak et al., 2019). In resting conditions, the lateral diffusion of the BCR is restricted by the cortical actin network, which becomes disassembled upon antigen engagement, enabling BCR lateral diffusion and subsequent clustering to promote downstream signaling (Mattila et al., 2016; Tolar, 2017; Freeman et al., 2018). During this phase, B cells exert a rapid spreading response by forming lamellipodia to expand the contact area with the antigen-presenting surface, thereby increasing the number of BCRs coupled to mAg (Fleire et al., 2006). Cell expansion is followed by a contraction phase, which serves to gather BCR microclusters at the center of the B cell synapse, which also relies on dynein-microtubule mediated transport (Harwood and Batista, 2010; Wang and Hammer, 2020). Actin retrograde flow at the synaptic interface can also promote the gathering of signaling molecules to the center of the synapse, as observed in T lymphocytes where coalescence of PLCγ1 molecules, which enables sustained T cell signaling, relies on the inward flow of actin (Babich et al., 2012). Whether a similar mechanism contributes to the coalescence of signaling microclusters at the IS of B cells, remained to be proven (Wang and Hammer, 2020). In addition to dynamic changes exerted at the cell cortex, IS formation also involves the mobilization of the centrosome together with lysosomes toward the Ag-contact site, where secretion of their content into the synaptic space facilitates antigen extraction from stiffer surfaces (Bellaiche et al., 2011; Ritter et al., 2015; del Valle Batalla et al., 2018). Exocytic events that occur at the synaptic membrane also rely on cortical actin cytoskeleton remodeling, where local actin depletion at the synaptic membrane is required for secretion of lytic granules in NK and cytotoxic T cells (Ritter et al., 2015; Gil-Krzewska et al., 2017).
Mobilization of the centrosome to the IS of T lymphocytes relies on dynein (Martín-Cófreces et al., 2008) where microtubule shrinkage, at the synaptic region, has been proposed to act as the pulling force needed for centrosome repositioning (Yi et al., 2013). In addition to the role of microtubules, studies in B cells, revealed that translocation of the centrosome from the perinuclear region to the IS requires the depletion of the actin pool surrounding the centrosome. This step is critical to allow its uncoupling from the nucleus, thereby promoting the establishment of a polarized phenotype (Obino et al., 2016). Thus, the capacity of B cells to organize an IS and execute their antigen-presenting function is strongly dependent on actin remodeling both at the cortical and perinuclear regions. How B cells orchestrate actin dynamics at both these levels remains to be resolved.
The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) has emerged as a critical regulator of cell signaling, polarization, cell division, and migration by selective proteolysis of ubiquitin-tagged proteins (Coux, 2002; Schaefer et al., 2012; Collins and Goldberg, 2017). This system comprises ubiquitin ligases that targets proteins for degradation by covalently conjugating them with ubiquitin, enabling recognition by the proteasome to drive their proteolysis (Collins and Goldberg, 2017). The proteasome is responsible for the degradation of most cytosolic proteins in mammalian cells. This protein complex is formed by the 20S core particle (CP) and the 19S regulatory particle (RP), that caps the 20S CP on one (26S proteasome) or both ends (30S proteasome) in an ATP-dependent manner and can dissociate reversibly (Collins and Goldberg, 2017). Proteasome assembly, activity, localization, and half-life is regulated by transcriptional and post-translational modifications of proteasomal subunits (Dahlmann, 2016; Collins and Goldberg, 2017; Dikic, 2017).
Among proteasome regulators, a 200 kDa protein, termed Ecm29, first characterized in yeast, binds the proteasome to motor proteins and vesicles, suggesting that it could play a role in the intracellular localization of the proteasome. Ecm29 has been shown to couple the proteasome to the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER), microtubules, and centrosome (Gorbea et al., 2010), however, the mechanisms by which Ecm29 recruits the proteasome to specific cellular compartments are not fully understood. In neurons, Ecm29 controls proteasome localization and mobilization across the axon by modulating its association with microtubules, where its activity and localization influences neuronal development and synaptic signaling (Otero et al., 2014; Hsu et al., 2015; Pinto et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2020).
In lymphocytes, proteasome activity and localization also play a crucial role in their function. Indeed, the inhibition of proteasome activity leads to defective actin remodeling and reduced ERK signaling, impairing efficient B and T lymphocyte activation (Schmidt et al., 2018; Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). Moreover, during asymmetric T cell division, the unequal segregation of the proteasome between the two daughter cells enables the selective degradation of the transcriptional factor Tbet, which ultimately leads to the acquisition of different phenotypes (Dennis et al., 2012). Thus, the localization of the proteasome is regulated in lymphocytes during asymmetric cell division, where control of cell polarity is critical. Analogously, in neurons, where cell polarity is also crucial, the localization of the proteasome targets the degradation of ubiquitylated proteins, required for axon development (Otero et al., 2014; Hsu et al., 2015) and presynaptic differentiation (Pinto et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2019). Here, a polarized phenotype is achieved by the selective degradation of polarity proteins, such as PAR-2, PAR-3, PAR-6 (Laumonnerie and Solecki, 2018), and actin polymerizing factors, such as VASP by the UPS (Boyer et al., 2020).
Interestingly, upon activation, B cells upregulate the ubiquitylation of proteins, including BCR downstream signaling molecules, polarity proteins, and actin polymerizing factors (Satpathy et al., 2015), highlighting a role for the UPS in regulating actin dynamics and B cell activation. We have previously shown that B cells contain an active proteasome pool at the centrosome, which is required for efficient actin clearance at this level, which enables centrosome repositioning to the immune synapse (Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). However, the underlying mechanisms of proteasome localization remain to be addressed in lymphocytes.
In this study, we explored whether Ecm29 controls the localization of the proteasome in B cells during the formation of an immune synapse and how this specific localization coordinates actin remodeling responses between the synaptic interface and the centrosome. Our results show that Ecm29 mediates the association of the proteasome with the microtubule network and regulates the distribution of proteasome pools at the centrosome and the immune synapse of B cells. As a consequence of Ecm29 silencing, B cells redistribute the proteasome to the synaptic membrane, which results in defective actin dynamics at this level, evidenced by slower actin retrograde flow at lamellipodia formed at the synaptic membrane and increased spreading responses. Ecm29-silenced B cells also displayed deficient actin depolymerization at the centrosome, which impair centrosome and lysosome repositioning at the immune synapse, resulting in reduced antigen extraction and presentation. Overall, our results contribute to the understanding of how B lymphocytes efficiently coordinate actin dynamics at the centrosome and the synaptic interface by controlling the localization of the proteasome. We propose that the distribution of the proteasome depends on Ecm29, which enables: (1) the accumulation of the proteasome at the centrosome, used to promote actin depolymerization required for centrosome re-positioning and lysosome recruitment at the IS and (2) the recruitment of proteasome to the synaptic membrane, promoting actin depolymerization at this level to enhance cell spreading and signaling.
Thus, Ecm29 emerges as a key regulator of proteasome distribution used to orchestrate key synaptic functions to facilitate antigen extraction and activation of B cells.
Results
Ecm29 Regulates the Localization of the Proteasome in B Cells
Intracellular compartmentalization of proteasome activity controls actin cytoskeleton remodeling in B cells during immune synapse formation (Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). We sought for potential regulators involved in proteasome distribution and focused on the molecule Ecm29, a proteasome adaptor, and scaffold protein, which binds to the 26S proteasome and links it to motor proteins, vesicles, centrosome, and microtubules (Gorbea et al., 2010). To this end, we first analyzed the localization of Ecm29 in B cells activated with antigens immobilized on 3 μM beads, which triggers the formation of an IS and compared them with non-activated B cells (Yuseff et al., 2013; Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). We found that upon activation with antigen-coated beads, Ecm29 progressively accumulated at the synaptic interface, which was quantified as the fluorescence ratio between the bead and the whole cell (Figures 1A,B), similarly to the proteasome (Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). To further characterize the distribution of Ecm29 at the synaptic membrane, we activated B cells on antigen-coated coverslips and labeled Ecm29 together with microtubules (α-tubulin) and the centrosome, labeled with centrin-GFP, which was validated as a centrosome marker (Supplementary Figure 1B). We found that Ecm29 was distributed in a central and peripheral pool, associated with the centrosome and cortical microtubules, respectively (Figure 1C). The accumulation of Ecm29 at the centrosome of B cells was verified by immunoblot of centrosome-rich fractions, where we found that Ecm29 cofractionated with γ-tubulin, a centrosome marker (Supplementary Figure 1A). Imaging analysis also revealed that Ecm29 colocalized with microtubules, displaying a Pearson’s mean coefficient over 0.67 in resting and activating conditions (Figures 1C,D). Importantly, colocalization was significatively higher compared to measurements performed after rotating a channel in 90°, used as a negative control (Pearson’s mean coefficient values of 0.27 and 0.18 for resting and activating conditions, respectively). Also, we found a minor colocalization with the Golgi apparatus (Supplementary Figure 1C). Association of Ecm29 with the microtubule network is supported by our observations showing that treatment with Nocodazole, a microtubule destabilizing drug, changed the distribution of Ecm29 and proteasome (19S), which both displayed a more cortical localization and loss their pericentral localization under these conditions (Supplementary Figures 1D,E). Indeed, the association of Ecm29 with microtubules was previously described in neurons, where it was shown to mediate proteasome retrograde transport and axon development (Otero et al., 2014; Hsu et al., 2015). Interestingly, we found that upon activation, Ecm29 slightly reduced its colocalization with microtubules and accumulated at the cell periphery (Figures 1C–E), suggesting that Ecm29 also changes its distribution in response to BCR stimulation.
Figure 1. Ecm29 co-localizes with microtubules and the centrosome and is recruited to the IS of B cells: (A) Scheme depicting activation of B cells with antigen-coated beads and representative Airyscan images of B cells activated for different time points (0, 30, and 60 min), labeled for actin (phalloidin) and Ecm29. Dashed white circles represent the bead. (B) Quantification scheme and quantification of Ecm29 recruitment at the immune synapse (Bead) after different time points of activation. N = 4. Cells > 54. (C) Scheme depicting activation of B cells onto antigen-coated coverslips. Representative Airyscan images of centrin-GFP expressing B cells in resting (0 min) and activating (60 min) conditions, labeled for Ecm29 (magenta), microtubules (α-tubulin, cyan). White arrows indicate the centrosome. Magnifications of centrosome areas (9 μm2) are shown. 90°channel rotation control is shown for both time points (Means: 0,27 and 0,18 for 0 and 60 min of activation, respectively). (D,E) Quantification of the colocalization of Ecm29 with microtubules and its accumulation at the IS center (see scheme) from experiment shown in C. N = 2. Cells > 61. ****p < 0.0001. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test, and Mann–Whitney test was performed for all statistical analyses. Mean with SEM bars are shown. Scale bar = 10 μm. ns, non-significant.
Next, we evaluated whether Ecm29 regulates the localization of the proteasome in B lymphocytes. For this purpose, we reduced the expression of Ecm29 in B cells by siRNA (Supplementary Figures 2A,B) and evaluated the distribution of the 26S proteasome in resting and activated B cells by immunofluorescence staining using an antibody that recognizes the 19S regulatory particle (RP). Upon Ecm29 silencing, we observed a reduction in the amount of proteasome at the centrosome of B cells under resting conditions, but not in activating conditions (Figures 2A,C). Moreover, upon activation both control and Ecm29-silenced B cells mobilized their proteasome away from the centrosome, suggesting that this event does not rely on Ecm29. Thus, Ecm29 is responsible for retaining the proteasome at the perinuclear region but is not required for its mobilization toward the cortex. Indeed, proteasome depletion from the centrosome of Ecm29-silenced B cells was confirmed by the detection of 19S RP by immunoblot in centrosome-rich fractions obtained from control and Ecm29-silenced cells. Quantification of the 19S RP, normalized by γ-tubulin levels, indicated there was a reduction in the amount of the proteasome at the centrosome of Ecm29-silenced B cells (Supplementary Figures 2E,F). Furthermore, quantification of proteasome activity in centrosome-rich fractions by using a fluorescent peptide as a substrate revealed a reduction in 50% of proteasome activity (Supplementary Figure 2G), which correlated with the decreased proteasome mass. When Ecm29-silenced cells were activated with antigen-coated beads, we observed enhanced accumulation of the proteasome at the antigen-bead contact site compare to control cells (blue area in line-scan) (Figures 2A,B). This result prompted us to further explore the distribution of the proteasome at the synaptic membrane of Ecm29-silenced B cells. To this end, we activated B cells by seeding them onto antigen-coated coverslips and labeled the 19S RP to visualize the proteasome as well as microtubules (α-tubulin), and the centrosome (Centrin-GFP). We found that the 19S RP significantly changed its distribution at the IS of Ecm29-silenced cells, exhibiting a more dispersed pattern, instead of colocalizing with microtubules (Figures 2D,E), suggesting that Ecm29 mediates the association of the proteasome with microtubules, analogously to what has been described in neurons (Hsu et al., 2015). Despite being more dispersed, the proteasome displayed slightly higher levels at the center of IS in Ecm29-silenced B cells (Figures 2D,F), suggesting that Ecm29 could be controlling proteasome distribution to the IS center, and potentially have an impact on the local degradation of protein targets within this region.
Figure 2. Ecm29 regulates proteasome localization at the centrosome and microtubules: (A) Top: Schematic representation of B cells activated with antigen-coated beads. Representative confocal images of centrin-GFP expressing control (siCTL) and Ecm29-silenced (siECM29) B cells in resting (0 min) or activating (60 min) conditions, labeled for 19S[S4] (red). Magnifications of the centrosome area (3 μm2) are shown. Fluorescence intensity distributions of centrin-GFP (green) and S4(19S) (red) across the cell (dashed white lines) are shown on the right. White dashed circles and shaded areas represent the bead and the centrosome area, respectively. (B,C) Scheme and quantification of proteasome enrichment at the centrosome and the bead in (A), respectively. N = 4. Cells > 97. (D) Schematic representation of B cells activated onto antigen-coated coverslips. Representative confocal images of centrin-GFP expressing control and Ecm29-silenced B cells after 60 min of activation, labeled for 19S[S4] and α-tubulin. The fluorescence intensity distributions of α-tubulin (blue) and S4(19S) (red) across the cell (dashed white lines) are shown. White arrows indicate the centrosome. (E,F) Quantification of proteasome colocalization with microtubules and proteasome recruitment at the IS center, respectively. N = 2. Cells > 53 and >48, respectively. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test, and Mann–Whitney test was performed for all statistical analyses. Mean with SEM bars are shown. Scale bar = 10 μm.
To characterize the dynamic recruitment of the proteasome at the IS in control versus Ecm29-silenced cells, we labeled the proteasome in live cells by using a specific fluorescent probe that binds to the catalytic β5 subunit (Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy). We used this probe at 5 nM in our assays, previously described not to significantly inhibit proteasome activity (Mlynarczuk-Bialy et al., 2014). Additionally, we verified that this dose did not generate an accumulation of ubiquitylated proteins (Supplementary Figure 3A), suggesting no significant effects over proteasome activity. Using this approach, we confirmed that the proteasome co-distributed with microtubules, displaying a central and peripheral localization at the synaptic membrane (Supplementary Figure 3B), with limited diffusion rates (median: 0.074 μm2/s) (Supplementary Figures 3C,D), comparable to those described in neurons (Otero et al., 2014). Using live cell imaging and Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy labeling, we also verified that in Ecm29-silenced cells, the 20S proteasome became more enriched at the IS than control counterparts, which was evidenced by a higher number and duration of proteasome tracks (Supplementary Figures 4A,C,E). When measuring proteasome diffusion rates, we observed that these were slightly higher in Ecm29-silenced cells without affecting their overall displacement at the IS (Supplementary Figures 4A,B,D). Altogether, these results suggest that Ecm29 regulates the recruitment of the 20S proteasome to the IS, controlling its diffusion rate, most likely in a microtubule-dependent manner.
Ecm29 has been shown to negatively regulate the proteasome by inhibiting its ATPase activity, which is crucial to unfold and translocate target proteins into the catalytic core for degradation (De La Mota-Peynado et al., 2013). To determine whether Ecm29 silencing affected the activity of the proteasome, we measured the amount of ubiquitylated proteins and proteasome subunits in Ecm29-silenced and control B cells. Quantification by immunoblot of proteasome subunits: S4 for the regulatory particle (19S), α-β for the catalytic core (20S), and LMP7 for the induced catalytic core (immune proteasome), showed no differences between control and Ecm29-silenced cells (Supplementary Figures 2C,D). These results indicate that in B cells, Ecm29 regulates the localization of the proteasome without significantly affecting its total mass or activity.
Ecm29 Regulates Actin Remodeling at the Synaptic Membrane and B Cell Spreading Responses
Having shown that Ecm29 regulates the distribution of the proteasome in B cells and considering that proteasome activity is crucial for actin remodeling at the centrosome and IS of B cells (Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a), we sought to determine whether actin levels at these two regions were affected by Ecm29 depletion. To this end, we seeded control and Ecm29-silenced B cells onto antigen-coated coverslips and imaged them by confocal microscopy, measuring the spreading area, delimited by actin labeling. Unexpectedly and contrary to the effect of inhibiting proteasome activity (Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a), we found that, after 30 and 60 min of activation, Ecm29-silenced cells displayed an increased spreading area, which was at least two-fold higher than control cells (Figures 3A,B). We next characterized actin dynamics at the synaptic interface of these cells by performing live imaging using TIRFM. For this purpose, control and Ecm29-silenced B cells expressing the actin fluorescent reporter LifeAct-mCherry were activated onto antigen-coated coverslips. Similar to our observations in fixed cells, Ecm29-silenced cells displayed an increased spreading response during activation, which was also approximately two-fold higher than control cells (Figures 3C,D). Under these conditions, we noticed that the spreading rate was also higher in Ecm29-silenced B cells (Figure 3D). Interestingly, these cells underwent continuous spreading, which was not followed by a stationary phase, generally observed in control cells after 10 min of activation, where spreading starts to slow down (Figure 3D). This observation suggests that Ecm29-silenced B cells sustain an uncontrolled spreading response without reaching a stationary phase or further contraction, as was previously shown by B cells interacting with membrane-tethered antigens (Fleire et al., 2006).
Figure 3. Ecm29 silencing enhances B cell spreading responses: (A) Representative confocal images of control (siCTL) and Ecm29-silenced (siECM29) B cells activated for different time points (0, 30, and 60 min), stained with phalloidin (green) and α-Tubulin (red) are shown. (B) Quantification of the spreading area in (A). N = 3. Cells > 40. (C) Representative Time-lapse images acquired by TIRFM of control and Ecm29-silenced B cells expressing LifeAct-mCherry (grayscale). (D,E) Quantification of the spreading area and aspect ratio (AR) and a schematic representation of AR values in (C), respectively. The mean spreading velocity and mean AR are shown. N = 10. *p < 0.05. ****p < 0.0001. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test, and Mann-Whitney test was performed for all statistical analyses were performed. Mean with SEM bars (B), lines (D,E), and boxes and whiskers with 10% percentile (E) are shown. Scale bar = 10 μm.
In T lymphocytes, immune synapse stability has been associated with forming symmetric synapse (Kumari et al., 2020). Given that Ecm29-silenced B cells displayed an uncontrolled spreading response, we investigated whether this was due to perturbed immune synapse stability. To this end, we quantified the IS symmetry during the spreading response in control and Ecm29-silenced B cells, measured as the aspect ratio of the spreading area. We found that the symmetry of the synapse in Ecm29-silenced cells was highly sustained compared to control cells (Figure 3E), suggesting that Ecm29 silencing enhances immune synapse stability in B cells.
Ecm29-silenced B cells also exhibited smaller lamellipodia, which could result from defects in actin polymerization, required to generate actin retrograde flow (Wang and Hammer, 2020). Thus, we sought to determine whether actin polymerization at lamellipodia, measured as the velocity of actin-retrograde flow, was also affected. For this purpose, we seeded LifeAct-mCherry expressing control and Ecm29-silenced B cells for 30 min in antigen-coated coverslips before performing live-cell imaging. We observed that the length of lamellipodia was significantly reduced in Ecm29-silenced B cells, which also showed a reduction in the velocity of actin-retrograde flow, compared to control cells (Figures 4A,B). Altogether these results highlight a role for Ecm29 in forming lamellipodia at the IS of B cells, and suggests that the proteasome close to the IS membrane could be regulating actin polymerization, probably, by the degradation of actin polymerizing factors, as was previously suggested (Hao et al., 2013; Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a).
Figure 4. Ecm29 silencing reduces actin dynamics and accumulation at the IS: (A) Representative TIRFM images of control (siCTL) and Ecm29-silenced (siECM29) B cells after 30 min of activation and their respective kymographs of lamellipodia (white dashed line). Red lines represent the actin retrograde flow angle. (B) Quantification of actin retrograde flow in (A). N = 17. (C) Time-lapse FRAP-TIRFM images of control and Ecm29-silenced B cells expressing Actin-GFP (grayscale) after 30 min of activation. Red and blue circles represent the bleached and non-bleached zone, respectively. (D,E) Quantification of Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching of Actin-GFP, and associated parameters (plateau, k, and half-life). N = 15. (F) Representative epifluorescence images of control and Ecm29-silenced B cells activated with antigen-coated beads for different time points, labeled for F-actin (Phalloidin) are shown. (G) Quantification of F-actin accumulation at the bead in F. N > 3. Cells > 80. (H) Representative immunoblot of control and Ecm29-silenced B cells. Arp2, WASp, HS1, and α-Tub are shown. (I) Quantification of protein levels in (E). N > 4. **p < 0.01. ****p < 0.0001. A Mann–Whitney was performed. Mean with SEMs and individual experiments (points) (A,G), and boxes with SEM (I) are shown. Scale bar = 10 μm.
To further evaluate the impact of Ecm29 on actin polymerization at the IS, we seeded actin-GFP-expressing B cells, silenced or not for Ecm29, onto antigen-coated coverslips for 30 min and performed a Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) assay using TIRFM. This assay allowed us to quantify actin turnover at the synaptic interface, as an indirect measurement of actin polymerization, previously reported in B cells (Pauls et al., 2020). Indeed, Ecm29-silenced cells showed a reduction in fluorescence recovery velocity, expressed as the rate constant (k) (Figures 4C–E), suggesting that actin polymerization at the synapse is reduced under these conditions. To determine whether reduced actin polymerization at the IS in Ecm29-silenced cells translated into less F-actin accumulation at the synaptic interface, we activated B cells with antigen-coated beads and measured its accumulation at the antigen contact site. As expected, after different time points of activation, we observed reduced F-actin levels at the antigen contact site (bead) in Ecm29-silenced cells compared to control cells (Figures 4F,G). Considering that Ecm29-silenced cells accumulate more proteasome at the IS, this highlights its negative correlation with F-actin accumulation at the IS.
To further explore a functional link between proteasome and actin polymerization at the IS, we co-labeled F-actin (LifeAct-mCherry) and the 20S proteasome (5 nM Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy) in live cells activated on antigen-coated coverslips for 30 min and analyzed the synaptic interface by TIRFM. We found that structures labeled for the proteasome negatively correlated with F-actin fluorescence (Supplementary Figures 5A–F,I). This negative correlation was dependent on proteasome activity because pre-treatment with 5 μM MG-132 or high concentrations of Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy (100 nM), which inhibits proteasome activity, abolished this negative correlation. On the other hand, the silencing of Ecm29, did not affect this negative correlation (Supplementary Figures 5G–I). Altogether, these results suggest that the proteasome at the synaptic interface is associated with F-actin depletion, with functional repercussions in actin turnover and lamellipodia formation.
To determine how the proteasome negatively regulates actin accumulation at the IS of B cells, we evaluated whether the levels of actin polymerizing factors, which are targets of proteasome degradation (Schaefer et al., 2012), changed in Ecm29-silenced cells. The levels of actin polymerizing factors, Arp2, WASp, and HS1, which have been shown to play a role in B cells (Bolger-Munro et al., 2019; Roper et al., 2019) were quantified in control and Ecm29-silenced B cells, by immunoblot. We found reduced levels of HS1 in Ecm29-silenced cells, whereas Arp2 or WASp remained unchanged (Figures 4H,I). Considering that HS1 is localized at the synaptic interface and the centrosome in B cells (Obino et al., 2016), our results suggest that, HS1 could be the main target of proteasome degradation at the synaptic interface during B cell activation, however, further studies are required to confirm this.
Ecm29 Silencing Enhances BCR Clustering and Signaling
Having shown that Ecm29 regulates actin polymerization at the IS, we next explored the role of Ecm29 in BCR signaling. F-actin depolymerization facilitates BCR diffusion at the IS, promoting receptor clustering, and signaling (Freeman et al., 2015; Tolar, 2017). Given that Ecm29 silencing reduced actin accumulation and turnover at the synapse, we evaluated whether the distribution of the BCR was affected under these conditions. Our results show that Ecm29-silenced cells displayed enhanced BCR accumulation at the center of the IS, especially after 30 min of activation, shown by the higher mean fluorescence (MFI) this region (the first quartile) (Figures 5A,B). This also translated into higher BCR downstream signaling where Erk phosphorylation levels, were higher in Ecm29-silenced cells compared to controls (Figure 5C). Thus, enhanced BCR clustering and signaling could result from unstable actin structures at the IS, increasing BCR mobility, as previously described (ref, Tolar, 2017). These observations suggest that the reduced actin polymerization at the IS in Ecm29-silenced B cells results in enhanced B cell activation. Considering that actin cytoskeleton remodeling is also important at the centrosome for antigen extraction and presentation (Obino et al., 2016; Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a), we next evaluated whether Ecm29 silencing could affect centrosome repositioning upon BCR activation.
Figure 5. Ecm29 silencing enhances BCR clustering and Erk phosphorylation: (A) Representative Epifluorescence images of control (siCTL) and Ecm29-silenced (siECM29) B cells, activated onto antigen-coated coverslips for different time points (0, 10, and 30 min), labeled for the BCR and F-actin (phalloidin). (B) Schematic representation of BCR distribution quantification, and the respective quantification of BCR accumulation in each quartile of the immune synapse in B cells shown in (A). N = 2. Cells > 30. (C) Immunoblot of protein of control and Ecm29-silenced B cells activated for different time points (0, 10, 30, and 60 min). Phosphorylated Erk (pErk) and total Erk (Erk) are shown. F.C., Fold of change respect time 0 min. ****p < 0.05. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test was performed for all statistical analyses. Scale Bar = 10 μm.
Ecm29 Regulates Centrosome Positioning at the IS
A hallmark of the B cell IS is the repositioning of the centrosome to the synaptic interface, which orchestrates the recruitment of lysosomes to the IS, where they undergo local secretion to facilitate antigen extraction (Bellaiche et al., 2011). Centrosome repositioning to the synaptic interface requires depolymerization of perinuclear actin that maintains the centrosome linked to the nucleus (Obino et al., 2016). We previously described that proteasome activity is crucial for actin depletion at the centrosome to enable centrosome repositioning (Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). Thus, we asked whether silencing Ecm29 in B cells had a similar effect, given that it results in the mislocalization of the proteasome. For this purpose, we activated control and Ecm29-silenced B cells expressing Centrin-GFP on antigen-coated coverslips and measured the recruitment of the centrosome to the synapse after different time points of activation. As previously described, we found that the centrosome reached the proximity of the antigen-coated surface in control conditions, which we detected at the first and second Z-axis section of the fluorescence distribution graph (Figures 6A,B). Conversely, in Ecm29-silenced cells, the centrosome was not recruited to the IS, where the mean fluorescence of Centrin-GFP remained between the third and sixth Z fraction of the fluorescence distribution graph (Figures 6A,C). Next, we quantified the amount of actin at the centrosome in control and Ecm29-silenced cells. Our imaging analysis showed that Ecm29-silenced B cells exhibit defective actin clearance at the centrosome after 30 min of activation (Figures 6D,E), which most likely results from a decrease in proteasome activity associated with the centrosome of these cells (Figures 2A,C and Supplementary Figure 2). However, after later time points of activation (60 min), Ecm29-silenced B cells were able to deplete centrosome-associated actin to the levels of control cells, suggesting that complementary mechanisms involved in actin depletion could be taking place after longer periods of activation.
Figure 6. Centrosome polarization and perinuclear actin clearance rely on Ecm29: (A) Representative X/Z confocal images of centrin-GFP expressing control (siCTL) and Ecm29-silenced (siECM29) B cells activated on antigen-coated coverslips for different time points, stained for F-actin, phalloidin are shown. White arrows indicate the centrosome. The white dashed line represents the position of the coverslip. (B,C) Quantification of centrosome fluorescence intensity along the Z dimension from the coverslip to the upper cell limit of control and Ecm29 silenced B cells, respectively. The green rectangle represents the synaptic Z area (between 1 and 2 Z-fraction), and the maximum value of the curve represents the localization of the centrosome in the Z dimension. N = 2. Cells > 19. (D) Representative Ayriscan images of centrin-GFP expressing control and Ecm29-silenced B cells activated on antigen-coated coverslips for different time points, labeled for F-actin, phalloidin. Magnifications of the centrosome (9 μm2) and the fluorescence intensity distribution of centrin-GFP (green) and phalloidin (red) across the cell (dashed white lines) are shown. White rectangles represent the X/Y position for images in Z. (E) Quantification of actin at the centrosome in D. N = 2. Cells > 45. *p < 0.05. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test, and Mann–Whitney test was performed for all statistical analyses. was performed for all statistical analyses. Mean with SEM lines (B,C) and bars (E) are shown. Scale bar = 10 μm.
To confirm our results, we measured the distance between the centrosome and the nucleus in control and Ecm29 silenced B cells activated with antigen-coated beads. As expected, in Ecm29-silenced cells the centrosome remained opposed to the nucleus, confirming their deficiency to translocate their centrosome to the synaptic membrane (Supplementary Figures 6A–C).
Ecm29 Silencing Impairs Antigen Extraction and Presentation in B Cells
Defective centrosome repositioning to the IS impairs the recruitment and local secretion of lysosomes at the synaptic membrane, which can facilitate the extraction and processing of immobilized antigens (Bellaiche et al., 2011; Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). Therefore, we investigated the functional consequences of Ecm29 silencing on antigen extraction and presentation by B cells. To this end, we performed an antigen presentation assay using control or Ecm29-silenced B cells (Figures 7A,B). Our results show that B cells silenced for Ecm29 display defective antigen presentation and reduced cell surface expression of MHC-II, as evidenced by lower levels of loaded peptide presentation by Ecm29-silenced cells to T cells (Figure 7B). The defects in antigen presentation could result from impaired antigen extraction and possibly MHC-II trafficking to the cell membrane. To evaluate this possibility, we activated control or Ecm29 silenced B cells with OVA-antigen-coated beads for different time points and measured the amount of OVA fluorescence remaining on the beads as an indicator of antigen extraction. We found that Ecm29 silenced cells showed higher OVA-antigen levels on beads after activation compared to control cells, confirming that Ecm29-silenced B cells could not efficiently extract antigen (Figures 7C,D). Considering that antigen extraction relies on lysosome recruitment and secretion (Bellaiche et al., 2011), we also followed the distribution of lysosomes labeled for Lamp1 in activated B cells and noticed that Ecm29 displayed delayed recruitment of lysosomes to the IS (Figures 7D,E). Overall, these results suggest that lysosome trafficking to the IS depends on Ecm29, which promotes centrosome repositioning by depolymerizing actin within this region.
Figure 7. Efficient antigen extraction and presentation requires Ecm29: (A) Antigen presentation assay for control (siCTL) and Ecm29 silenced (siECM9) B cells. Levels of IL-2 by T cells were quantified by ELISA. N = 3. (B) Representative graph of peptide controls for cells used in antigen presentation assays. (C) Representative images of control and Ecm29 silenced B cells activated with beads coated with anti-IgG + OVA in resting (0 min) and activating conditions (60 min). Lysosomes (Lamp1) and antigen (OVA) are shown. The white dashed circles delimit cell boundaries and bead. (D,E) Quantification of antigen extraction, measured as the amount of OVA extracted from the bead, and lysosome recruitment to the bead in (C). N = 4. Cells > 82. **p < 0.01. ***p < 0.001. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test, and Mann–Whitney test was performed for all statistical analyses was performed for all statistical analyses. Mean with SEM bars (A,D), individual cells (points) (E) are shown. Scale bar = 10 μm.
In summary, we put forward a novel mechanism involved in regulating the B cell immune synapse, where Ecm-29 dependent proteasome distribution orchestrates actin remodeling at the synaptic interface and the centrosome, thereby controlling key cellular functions such as lysosome trafficking and antigen extraction and presentation.
Discussion
A functional immune synapse relies on actin remodeling at the synaptic membrane and the centrosome: The former promotes BCR clustering and downstream signaling (Freeman et al., 2015; Tolar, 2017; Spillane and Tolar, 2018), and the latter enables centrosome repositioning to the IS together with lysosomes, which, upon secretion, facilitate antigen extraction (Bellaiche et al., 2011; Obino et al., 2016; Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). Our work reveals that the localization of the proteasome at the synaptic interface and centrosome relies on Ecm29, which in turn regulates actin remodeling in both compartments; and, therefore, plays a pivotal role in immune synapse formation, antigen extraction, and presentation (Figure 8).
Figure 8. Proposed model: In resting conditions, Ecm29 enhances proteasome localization at the centrosome. Upon activation, Ecm29 regulates the distribution of the proteasome at the synaptic interface. The subcellular localization of the proteasome between the centrosome and the immune synapse regulates actin remodeling in both compartments. At the centrosome, the proteasome facilitates early actin clearance and therefore centrosome translocation at the synapse, whereas at the immune synapse, the proteasome enhances actin remodeling by reducing its stability, thereby promoting cell spreading, BCR clustering and signaling. Further studies are required to determine which actin regulatory proteins are degraded by the proteasome, upon B cell activation and contribute to actin remodeling.
A role of Ecm29 in regulating the localization of the proteasome has been previously reported in neurons (Otero et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2020), but has remained relatively unexplored in lymphocytes. The underlying mechanisms by which Ecm29 regulates the intracellular localization of the proteasome include: (1) promoting the interaction of the proteasome with motor proteins, such as kinesins and dyneins, which directly anchors the proteasome to microtubules, and is responsible for proteasome retrograde and anterograde movement (Hsu et al., 2015) (2) mediating the association of the proteasome to vesicles and favors its fast movement by hitch-hiking (Otero et al., 2014) and (3) promoting the association of the proteasome with Rab11 + recycling vesicles and organelles, such as Endoplasmic Reticulum and the centrosome (Gorbea et al., 2004, 2010). Our work suggests that Ecm29 mediates the association of the proteasome to microtubules and the centrosome in B cells; however, the molecular mechanisms involved in mobilizing the proteasome remain to be explored.
Interestingly, Ecm29 has also been described to act as a proteasome inhibitor and quality control protein, where its association to the proteasome inhibits the ATPase activity of the regulatory particle and stabilizes its interaction with the catalytic core (Lehmann et al., 2010; De La Mota-Peynado et al., 2013; Haratake et al., 2016). However, we found that Ecm29 silencing did not affect overall levels of proteasome activity, measured as the accumulation of ubiquitylated proteins, which suggest that in B cells, Ecm29 regulates proteasome localization rather its activity. Despite of this, further analysis of how Ecm29 affects specific proteasome functions, such as degradation rate, ATPase activity, or specific protease activity, are needed to completely discard whether or not Ecm29 affects proteasome activity.
B cells silenced for Ecm29 displayed lower levels of proteasome at the centrosome, which correlated to increased F-actin at this level, suggesting that centrosome-associated proteasome could act as a negative regulator of actin polymerization within this region. This observation is consistent with our previous findings, where inhibition of proteasome activity also induced an accumulation of F-actin at the centrosome and defective actin clearance upon B cell activation, disabling centrosome repositioning to the synapse (Obino et al., 2016; Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019a). Accordingly, our results show that decreasing the proteasome at the centrosome, by silencing Ecm29, also leads to defective centrosome repositioning at the IS. As anticipated, defective centrosome polarization in Ecm29 silenced B cells correlated with poor lysosome recruitment to the IS and impaired antigen extraction and presentation. Thus, our results show that the proteasome pool associated to the centrosome regulates local proteostasis at this level, which is in the same line with previous observations suggesting that the centrosome acts as a platform for local UPS-mediated degradation (Vora and Phillips, 2016). Noticeably, at later time-points of activation, Ecm29-silenced B cells displayed reduced actin levels at the centrosome, which were comparable to control cells, suggesting other mechanisms might regulate actin at this stage. Such mechanisms could involve the local activation of actin-severing proteins, such as cofilin, which was previously associated to actin depletion in B cells (Freeman et al., 2015, 2018).
A striking observation reported here is that upon activation, Ecm29-silenced cells accumulated higher proteasome levels at the cortical and synaptic regions. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that Ecm29 favors the centrosomal localization of the proteasome, excluding it from the cell cortex and the IS. The molecular mechanisms underlying the cortical localization of the proteasome are not understood in lymphocytes. However, in neurons, adaptor proteins, such as GPM6A/B, were shown to mediate the interaction of the proteasome with the plasma membrane (Ramachandran and Margolis, 2017). Thus, it would be interesting to address whether the mechanisms involved in the localization of cortical proteasome in neurons are shared by lymphocytes.
In addition to enhanced proteasome levels at the IS, Ecm29 silenced cells displayed reduced actin turnover and slower actin-retrograde flow at the synaptic interface, suggesting that actin polymerization at the IS was reduced within this zone. These observations are consistent with the general view of the proteasome as a negative regulator of actin polymerization (Schaefer et al., 2012; Hsu et al., 2015), where actin nucleating factors are selectively downregulated by the UPS (de la Fuente et al., 2007), thereby turning down actin polymerization. This idea is further supported by our observations, where we found that HS1 was decreased upon Ecm29 silencing, indicating that this protein could be targeted for proteasome degradation. Indeed, HS1 has five ubiquitin sites (K34, K60, K123, K192, and K239) (Hornbeck et al., 2012). In B cells, BCR activation triggers HS1 phosphorylation by Syk, and its subsequent recruitment to the IS, being crucial in the promotion of actin assembly at the IS (Hao et al., 2004; Obino et al., 2016). Thus, it is possible that silencing Ecm29, which results in increased levels of proteasome at the IS and enhanced HS1 degradation, could be responsible for poor actin accumulation at the synaptic interface, upon BCR activation. On the other hand, Ecm29 silencing did not alter WASp levels, which could be a consequence of its interaction with WASp interacting protein (WIP), which protects WASp from degradation and is also recruited to the IS of B cells (Keppler et al., 2018). Alternatively, the exacerbated spreading response and defective antigen extraction observed in Ecm29-silenced B cells, could also result from impaired Myosin II activity. Myosin II promotes contractile forces, which restrict cell spreading (Wakatsuki et al., 2003) and was also shown to exert pulling forces at the synaptic membrane of B lymphocytes to promote antigen extraction (Natkanski et al., 2013).
The actin cytoskeleton plays a critical role in BCR signaling by restricting its lateral diffusion and association with co-receptors (Tolar, 2017). Indeed, B cells treated with drugs that disrupt actin organization induce BCR signaling in the absence of ligand (Batista et al., 2010). Additionally, proteins belonging to the Ezrin-Radixin-Moesin Family (ERM family), which link the actin cytoskeleton to the plasma membrane, negatively regulate BCR lateral diffusion (Treanor et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2013; Tolar, 2017) and can be degraded by the proteasome (Grune et al., 2002). Interestingly, it has been reported that upon BCR activation, an early ubiquitylation response affects BCR downstream kinases, signaling components, such as LAT2, RAC1, CDC42, VAV1, and Ezrin (Satpathy et al., 2015). Thus, in addition to actin polymerizing factors, the proteasome at the IS could degrade proteins involved in BCR activation, as well as other factors that couple actin to the cell cortex, such as ezrin, and control membrane tension (Schaefer et al., 2012; Kelkar et al., 2020). Consequently, the larger spreading area displayed by Ecm29 silenced B cells, which accumulate more proteasome at the synaptic membrane, could result from a relaxed cortex or enhanced BCR signaling. Thus, the timely recruitment of the proteasome to the immune synapse is crucial to determine where and which proteins would be degraded.
Interestingly, microtubules drive the spreading response in fibroblasts, where the rapid growth of microtubules toward the cell borders is essential for isotropic spreading (Tvorogova et al., 2018). In our study, we found that Ecm29-silenced B cells displayed a highly symmetric IS, which resembles an isotropic spreading response. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the increased spreading response and the slow actin-retrograde flow in Ecm29-silenced B could allow microtubule growth toward the cell margins, which would lead to a sustained spreading and reduced actin-retrograde flow. Indeed, an analogous negative correlation between the actin cytoskeleton and microtubules was previously described at the centrosome, where the reduction of polymerized actin at the centrosome triggered an increased microtubule growth (Inoue et al., 2019). The role of the proteasome selectively degrading molecules that tune the microtubule-actin crosstalk at the synaptic membrane shall provide insights on how antigen extraction and processing are regulated at the B cell synapse.
In conclusion, our work reveals that the distribution of the proteasome, mediated by Ecm29, controls the formation of the IS by regulating actin dynamics at the centrosome and synaptic membrane. These new findings contribute to understanding how B lymphocytes efficiently manage to orchestrate complex actin cytoskeleton remodeling at these two levels and control the establishment of a polarized phenotype during IS formation.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines and Culture
The mouse lymphoma cell line IIA1.6, which is a FcγR-defective B cell line with the phenotype of quiescent mature B-cells (Lankar et al., 2002) and the LMR7.5 Lack T-cell hybridoma, which recognizes I-Ad-LACK156–173 complexes, were cultured as previously described (Vascotto et al., 2007) in CLICK medium (RPMI 1640, 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin, 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol, and 2% sodium pyruvate. For proteasome inhibition, 5 × 106 B cells/mL were incubated with 5 μM MG-132 for 1 h at 37°C before functional analysis.
Antibodies and Reagents
We used rat anti-mouse LAMP1 (BD Bioscience, #553792, 1:200), rabbit anti-mouse α-Tubulin (Abcam, ab#6160, 1:200), rabbit anti-acetyl-α-Tubulin (Lys40; cell signaling, #5335, 1:200), rabbit anti-mouse γ-Tubulin (Abcam, #Ab11317, 1:1000), rabbit anti-mouse S4/19S RP (Abcam, #Ab223765, 1:100), rabbit anti-mouse αβ/20S proteasome (Abcam, #Ab22673, 1:200), anti-mouse Ecm29 (Abcam, #Ab28666, 1:100), mouse anti-mouse Ubiquitin P4D1 (Santa Cruz, #Sc-8017, 1:1000), anti-mouse anti-actin (cloneC4, ImmunO, #691001), rabbit anti-mouse Arp2 (Cellsignal, #5614, 1:500), goat anti-mouse IgGFab2 (Jackson ImmunoResearch), rabbit anti-OVA (Sigma-Aldrich, #C6534, 1:500). For secondary antibodies: donkey anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa488 (LifeTech, 1:200), goat anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa546 (ThermoScientific, 1:200), Donkey anti-rat IgG-Alexa546 (ThermoScientific, 1:200), Donkey anti-rat-Alexa647 (ThermoScientific, 1:200), Phalloidin-Alexa-647 (Life Technology, #22287, 1:200), DAPI (Abcam). Ovalbumin and Nocodazole were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, MG-132, and Epoxomicin were purchased from Merk (Millipore). Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy was kindly provided by Ulrike Kuckelkorn (Mlynarczuk-Bialy et al., 2014).
Cell Transfection
LifeAct-mCherry and αTubulin-mCherry plasmids were kindly provided by Ana Maria Lennon. For Ecm29, a silencing siRNA kit was purchased from Qiagen (1027416) and used as the combination of four different siRNA at 2.5 nM each one. As a control, we used a scrambled siRNA (Qiagen) at 10 nM. Nucleofector R T16 (Lonza, Gaithersburg, MD, United States) was used to electroporate 5 × 106 IIA1.6 B Lymphoma cells with 2 μg of plasmid DNA. After transfection, cells were cultured for 16 hrs before functional analysis.
Preparation of Ag-Coated Beads and AG-Coated Coverslips
Antigen-coated beads were prepared as previously described (Bellaiche et al., 2011). Briefly, ∼2 × 107 3-μm latex NH2-beads (Polyscience, Eppelheim, Germany) were activated with 8% glutaraldehyde for four h at room temperature. Beads were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated overnight at 4°C with different ligands: using 100 μg/mL of either F(ab’)2 goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG), referred to as BCR-Ligand+ or F(ab’)2 goat anti-mouse IgM, referred to as BCR-Ligand– (MP Biomedical, Santa Ana, CA, United States). For antigen extraction assays, beads were coated with BCR-Ligand+ or BCR-ligands– plus OVA 100 μg/mL. For antigen presentation assays, beads were coated with BCR+ or BCR– ligands plus 100 μg/mL Lack protein. Antigen coverslips used to analyze the synaptic interface were coated with BCR-Ligand+ overnight at 4°C in PBS.
Activation of B Cells With Ag-Coated Beads or Coverslips
Cells were plated on poly-L-Lysine–coated glass coverslips and activated with Ag-coated beads (1:1 ratio) for different time points in a cell culture incubator (37°C/5% CO2) and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min at room temperature as previously described (Bellaiche et al., 2011). Fixed cells were incubated with antibodies in PBS-0.2% BSA-0.05% Saponin. In order to measure cell spreading, the B cell line was plated onto B220/anti-IgG, or anti-IgM coated glass coverslips, respectively, for different time points at 37°C in a cell culture incubator as previously described (Reversat et al., 2015).
Antigen Presentation Assay
Ag presentation assays were performed as previously described (Bellaiche et al., 2011). Briefly, IIA 1.6 (I-Ad) B cells were incubated with either Lack-BCR-Ligand+ or BCR-Ligand– coated beads or different Lack peptide concentrations (Lack156–173) for 1 h. Then Cells were washed with PBS, fixed in ice-cold PBS/0.01% glutaraldehyde for 1 min, and quenched with PBS/100 mM glycine. B cells were then incubated with Lack-specific LMR 7.5 T Cells in a 1:1 ratio for 4 h. Supernatants were collected, and interleukin-2 cytokine production was measured using BD optiEA Mouse IL-2 ELISA set following the manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences).
Ag Extraction Assay
For antigen extraction assays, B cells incubated in a 1:1 ratio with BCR ligand+-OVA-coated beads were plated on poly-Lys cover-slides at 37°C, fixed and stained for OVA. The amount of OVA remaining on the beads was calculated by establishing a fixed area around beads in contact with cells and measuring fluorescence on three-dimensional (3D) projections obtained from the sum of each plane (Details in “Image Analysis” section). The percentage of antigen extracted was estimated by the percentage of fluorescence intensity lost by the beads after 1 h.
Centrosome Isolation
Centrosome from B cells was isolated as previously described (Obino et al., 2016) with slight modifications. Briefly, B cells in resting conditions (CLICK-2% FBS) at 37°C/5%CO2, were treated with adding 2 μM cytochalasin D (Merck Millipore) and 0.2 μM Nocodazole (Merck Millipore). Cells were washed in TBS (10 mM Tris-HCl 15 mM NaCl pH 7.5), then in 0.1X TBS supplemented with 8% sucrose and lysed in lysis buffer (1mM HEPES. 0.5% NP-40, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol pH 7.2) supplemented with protease inhibitors for 15 min. Centrosomes were isolated from post-nuclear-supernatants by consecutive centrifugations at (1) 10,000 g for 30 min at 4°C on top of a 60% w/v sucrose cushion in gradient buffer (10 mM PIPES, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol pH 7.2) and (2) 40,000 g for 60 min at 4°C on top of a discontinuous sucrose gradient (40–50–70% w/w). Finally, 12 fractions were recovered from the top to the bottom of the tube, and centrosome-containing fractions were detected by immunoblot γ-tubulin labeling.
Proteasome Activity
Protein extracts obtained from B cells were quantified and loaded onto black MaxiSorp 96 well plate (Nunc, Denmark) with proteasome substrate III fluorogenic (Calbiochem, Merck Millipore) diluted in Assay buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH: 7.2, 0.05 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT). The plate was incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and then fluorescence was measured at 360/420 nm. All measurements were performed in triplicate.
Cell Imaging
For epifluorescence imaging, all Z-stack images were obtained with 0.5 microns between slices. Images were acquired in an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Ti2Eclipse) with an X60/1.25NA and X100/1.3NA oil immersion objectives for bead and spreading assays, respectively. For confocal microscopy, images were acquired in a Nikon Ti2Eclipse inverted microscope with 60X/1.45NA oil immersion for bead and spreading assays, with a Z-stack of 0.5 microns. For Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM), images were acquired in Nikon Ti2Eclipse inverted microscope with a 100x/1.50 NA oil immersion lens and an iXON Ultra EMCCD camera at 37°C. B-cells expressing LifeAct-mCherry were plated on Ag-coated glass chambers (NuncTM Lab-TekTM II). Images were acquired for 30 min at 15 s per frame for spreading assay and for 1 min at 0.75 s per frame for lysosome, proteasome, and actin retrograde flow tracking. For Ayriscan acquisition, images were obtained in the Zeiss LSM880 Airyscan Confocal microscope with a 63X/1.4NA oil immersion lens, with a Z-stack of 0.2 μm. The images were processed using Zeiss Black Zen software and analyzed with FIJI.
Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching in TIRFM (FRAP-TIRFM)
IIA1.6 cells were transfected with Actin-GFP together with scramble siRNA (siCTL) or ECM29-targeting siRNA (siECM29), and then allowed to spread onto antigen-coated coverslips for 30–40 min at 37°C in HEPES supplemented CLICK. Cells were then mounted on a stage-top incubator, and one central region was manually selected for photobleaching using a 405 nm laser (70% intensity, 100 ms, ND Stimulation unit), concurrent with Nikon TIRFM imaging. GFP signal intensity within the bleached zone was normalized to intensity values from an unbleached control region in the same cell. The curves were also y-transformed to (0,0) at t = 0 (bleaching event) so that individual recovery curves begin at the intensity minimum. Each recovery curve group was then fit to the following equation, with the constraint that Y0 = 0: Y = Y0 + (plateau-Y0)∗(1-e–k*x). The rate constant (k) was derived by non-linear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism software.
Image Analysis
Image processing and analysis were performed with FIJI (ImageJ) software (Schindelin et al., 2012), as we previously described (Ibañez-Vega et al., 2019b). The centrosome was labeled with Centrin-GFP or α-Tubulin and determined by the brightest point where microtubules converged. Single-cell images shown in the figures were cropped from a larger field. Image brightness and contrast were manually adjusted. Centrosome polarity index was determined as previously described (Bellaiche et al., 2011). Briefly, we manually selected the location of the centrosome (Cent) and delimited the cell and bead borders to obtain the center of mass of both CMC (Cell mass center) and BMC (Bead mass center), respectively. The position of the centrosome was projected (CentProj) on the vector defined by the CMC-BMC axis. The centrosome polarity index was calculated by dividing the distance between the CMC and CentProj and the distance between CMC-BMC. The index ranges from –1 (anti-polarized) and +1 (fully polarized).
Proteasome recruitment to the IS in bead assays was quantified by dividing the fluorescence at the bead by the whole cell’s fluorescence and then multiplying it by a factor of 100. For spreading assays, we manually delimited the border of the cell using a phalloidin label as a template (CellTemp); then, an ellipse was automatically determined (CenterTemp) at the center of CellTemp, which had a third of the CellTemp area. Next, the center’s recruitment was calculated by dividing the fluorescence normalized by its area from CenterTemp and CellTemp, subtracting 1. Therefore, positive values mean that the fluorescence is enriched at the center, and negative values, the opposite.
For actin quantification at the centrosome, we traced a circle with a 1μm radius with its center as the centrosome. The fluorescence at the centrosome (FCent) and its Area (ACent) were measured. The corresponding ratio gives the fluorescence density index (DCent = FCent/ACent). This value is divided by the density of the fluorescence of the entire cell (DCell). Values above 1 indicate an accumulation of the label at the centrosome compared to the whole cell. Whereas values below 1 indicate that there is a depletion at the centrosome compared to the whole cell.
For lysosome and proteasome tracking, we used the Trackmate plugin from FIJI (Schindelin et al., 2012), considering each spot with areas of 1 μm2 and manually thresholded by the quality index.
The proteasome (Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy) fluorescence correlation with F-actin (LifeAct-mCherry) fluorescence of B cells seeded for 30 min in antigen-coated coverslips was automatically measured by a FIJI macros function. Briefly, the proteasome label was automatically detected by Analyze particle, and the proteasome and F-actin fluorescence were measured in each proteasome-spot (1 μm diameter circle). Next, each fluorescence signal was normalized by the total cell fluorescence in each frame to normalize fluorescence variation by LifeAct expression or Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy dosage. Then, the proteasome fluorescence and the related LifeAct fluorescence were arranged into discrete groups and graphed.
The spreading area of LifeAct-mCherry expressing B cells activated onto antigen-coated coverslips recorded by TIRFM was assessed by FIJI. Briefly, images were thresholded and binarized to detect cell boundaries automatically, and then cell areas were detected in each frame by Analyze particle plugin (FIJI). The spreading velocity was calculated by linear regression of area per time data. The asymmetry of the immune synapse was measured by the aspect ratio of each spreading area per frame, as previously described (Kumari et al., 2020).
Quantification of actin retrograde flow was performed as previously described (Jankowska and Burkhardt, 2017). Briefly, TIRFM recorded LifeAct-mCherry expressing B cells after 30 min of activation onto antigen-coated coverslips, were analyzed by FIJI, by reslicing two different lamellipodia structures per each cell, and manually drawing an angle at the edge of the lamellipodium. Each angle was transformed in microns per second, by converting the angle to radians (Rad-angle) and applying the following formula: V(μm/s) = tan(Rad_angle).
Quantification of BCR clustering at the IS center was performed by using an adaptation of the clock scan analysis plugin for Fiji (Dobretsov et al., 2017) implemented in a personalized macro with machine learning correction with the advanced Weka segmentation tool (Arganda-Carreras et al., 2017). Data obtained from the images was then curated and filtered using Rstudio. Briefly, outliers were eliminated using the IQR correction and the distribution of fluorescence (MFI) was divided into four quartiles, considering the distance from the center of mass of each cell to their correspondent periphery. Data was assessed for its normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and multiple comparison tests were performed using ANOVA and post hoc tests (Tukey).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with Prism (GraphPad Software) and RStudio. The p-values were calculated using different tests, as indicated in figure legends.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author Contributions
JI-V designed, performed, and analyzed most of the experiments, assembled the figures, and participated in the writing of the manuscript. FD performed the immunofluorescence and biochemical experiments and participated in the writing of the manuscript. JS helped to setup image quantification protocols. FG synthesized the lack peptide (Lack 156-173) used for all antigen presentation assays. JD helped with biochemical experiments. MY wrote the manuscript. MY and AS proposed the original hypothesis, designed the experiments, supervised and funded the overall research. All the authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
MY was supported by a research grant from FONDECYT (1180900), AS was supported by a CONICYT Basal Financial Program AFB170005, JI-V was supported by a CONICYT PFCHA/Doctorado Nacional Chile/2015-21150566, and FD was supported by a CONICYT PFCHA/Doctorado Nacional Chile/2018-21191062.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Unidad de Microscopia Avanzada (UMA) of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile for its support in image acquisition.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.650817/full#supplementary-material
Supplementary Figure 1 | Ecm29 cofractionates with the centrosome in B cells. (A) Representative immunoblot of centrosome fractions isolated from B cells in resting conditions, where γ-tubulin (centrosome) and Ecm29 were detected. (B) Representative confocal images of B cells in resting conditions, showing Centrin-GFP, γ-tubulin, and Golgi, and co-localization analysis. (C) Representative confocal images of B cells in resting or activating conditions, showing Golgi, Centrin, and Ecm29, and line-scan analysis of each label across the cell. (D) Representative images of B cells in resting or activating conditions (60 min of activation) with antigen-coated beads, pretreated with DMSO as a control, 30 μM Nocodazole (NocZ) for 30 min. For activated B cells, drug treatment was performed after 30 min of activation. S4(19S RP), α-Tubulin, F-actin, and merge are shown. (F) Representative images of resting B cells or activated on antigen-coated coverslips (60 min of activation) pretreated with DMSO as a control, 30 μM Nocodazole (NocZ) for 30 min. For activated B cells, drug treatment was performed after 30 min of activation. Two sets of staining are shown: (1) S4(19S RP), α-Tubulin, F-actin, merge, and (2) Ecm29, α-Tubulin, F-actin, and merge, are shown. Scale Bar = 10 μm.
Supplementary Figure 2 | Ecm29 silencing does not affect levels of ubiquitylated proteins, but reduces proteasome levels at the centrosome in resting B cells. (A) Representative immunoblot of protein extracts obtained from resting B cells transfected with scrambled siRNA (siCTL) and Ecm29 targeted siRNA (siECM29). Ecm29 and BCR are shown. (B) Quantification Ecm29 levels in (A). N = 7. (C) Representative immunoblot of control and Ecm29-silenced B cells in resting conditions, stained for Ubiquitin, Ecm29, S4 (19S), αβ (20S), LMP7, and actin. (D) Quantification of protein levels in (C). N > 3. (E) Representative immunoblot of centrosome isolated fractions isolated from control and Ecm29-silenced B cells. S4 (19S) and γ-Tubulin are shown. Red rectangle indicates the centrosome-rich fractions. (F,G) Quantification of S4 (19S) protein levels (N = 3) and proteasome activity (N = 2) in centrosome-rich fractions in (E), respectively. ∗∗p < 0.01. Mann–Whitney test was performed for all statistical analyses. Mean with SEM bars are shown.
Supplementary Figure 3 | Live tracking of the proteasome shows it colocalizes with microtubules and is distributed across the IS. (A) Immunoblot of B cells treated with increasing concentrations of the specific proteasome probe (Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy) for 2 h, ubiquitin and actin labeling are shown. F.C., Fold of Change respect to the control (0 nM of Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy). (B) TIRFM Time-lapse and kymograph of α-Tubulin-mCherry (grayscale) expressing B cells probed with 5 nM Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy (Red). Black arrowheads indicate proteasome positive spots. Below: Table summarizing the colocalization of the proteasome (Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy) and α-Tubulin-mCherry. Overlap coefficient, k1, k2, Manders 1, and Manders 2, are shown. (C) Time-lapse images obtained by TIRFM of B cells labeled for proteasome (grayscale). The accumulation of proteasome tracks (right) is shown. The coldest colors represent the fastest tracks—Kymograph (below). Black arrowheads indicate proteasome positive spots at center and periphery. (D) Histogram of proteasome diffusion coefficient measured in (C). N = 2, Cells > 30. Scale Bar = 10 μm.
Supplementary Figure 4 | Proteasome recruitment and distribution at the IS rely on Ecm29: (A) Representative Time-lapse images by TIRFM of control (siCTL) and Ecm29-silenced (siECM29) B cells after 30 min of activation on antigen-coated coverslips, probed with 5 nM Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy (gray scale). The cell boundary (black line) delimited by the LifeAct-mCherry signal (mask) and accumulation of tracks are shown. The coldest colors represent the fastest tracks. (B–E) Quantification of track displacement, track duration, track mean velocity, and the number of tracks of proteasomes at the IS of control or Ecm29 silenced B cells after 30 min of activation on antigen-coated coverslips. N > 20 Cells. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Mann–Whitney test was performed. Scale Bar = 10 μm.
Supplementary Figure 5 | Proteasome arrival at the IS negatively regulates actin polymerization. (A,C,E,G) Representative TIRFM images of control, MG-132 pre-treated (5 μM for 1 h), Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy overdosed (100 nM), and Ecm29-silenced (siECM29) B cells. B cells were plated for 30 min onto antigen-coated coverslips and then recorded. LifeAct-mCherry (white) and proteasome (green [Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy]), magnifications proteasome spots (white dashed rectangles), together with their respective kymograph, are shown. White arrowheads indicate the proteasome arrival at the IS close to F-actin structures. (B,D,F,H) Quantification of the proteasome (green) and LifeAct-mCherry (Red) distribution at proteasome positive spots (white dashed line) and their distribution in time (Kymograph) showed on (A,C,D,G), respectively. (I) Scheme illustrating the quantification rationale and results of the quantification of normalized fluorescence intensity correlation between Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy and LifeAct-mCherry, on Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy-positive spots of 1 μm in diameter shown in (A,C,G,E). N > 10. ∗p < 0.05. ∗∗p < 0.001. ∗∗∗p < 0.0005. ****p < 0.0001. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test was performed for all statistical analyses was performed. Each dot represents an independent positive Bsc2118-FL-Bodipy spot. Mean with SEM lines are shown. Scale Bar = 10 μm.
Supplementary Figure 6 | Centrosome-nucleus separation and centrosome recruitment to the IS is impaired in Ecm29-silenced B cells: (A) Representative Epifluorescence images of control (siCTL) and Ecm29-silenced (siECM29) B cells, activated with antigen-coated beads for different time points. Centrosome (Centrin-GFP) and nucleus (DAPI) are shown. The dashed line represents the distance between the centrosome-nucleus. A scheme depicting how the cell polarity index and the distance between the centrosome and nucleus were calculated, is shown. (B,C) Quantification of centrosome-nucleus distances and centrosome polarization in (A). N > 3. Cells > 116. Each dot represents an individual measurement (C). Mean with SEM lines (C) and bars (B) are shown. ∗∗∗p < 0.0005. ****p < 0.0001. Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s test was performed. Scale Bar = 10 μm.
References
Arganda-Carreras, I., Kaynig, V., Rueden, C., Eliceiri, K. W., Schindelin, J., Cardona, A., et al. (2017). Trainable weka segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics 33, 2424–2426. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx180
Babich, A., Li, S., O’Connor, R. S., Milone, M. C., Freedman, B. D., and Burkhardt, J. K. (2012). F-actin polymerization and retrograde flow drive sustained PLCγ1 signaling during T cell activation. J. Cell Biol. 197, 775–787. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201201018
Batista, F. D., Treanor, B., and Harwood, N. E. (2010). Visualizing a role for the actin cytoskeleton in the regulation of B-cell activation. Immunol. Rev. 237, 191–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00943.x
Bellaiche, Y., Gasman, S., Desdouets, C., Yuseff, M.-I., Darchen, F., Jauffred, B., et al. (2011). Polarized secretion of lysosomes at the B cell synapse couples antigen extraction to processing and presentation. Immunity 35, 361–374. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.07.008
Bolger-Munro, M., Choi, K., Scurll, J. M., Abraham, L., Chappell, R. S., Sheen, D., et al. (2019). Arp2/3 complex-driven spatial patterning of the BCR enhances immune synapse formation. BCR signaling and B cell activation. eLife 8:e44574. doi: 10.7554/elife.44574
Boyer, N. P., McCormick, L. E., Menon, S., Urbina, F. L., and Gupton, S. L. (2020). A pair of E3 ubiquitin ligases compete to regulate filopodial dynamics and axon guidance. J. Cell Biol. 219:e201902088. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201902088
Collins, G. A., and Goldberg, A. L. (2017). The logic of the 26S proteasome. Cell 169, 792–806. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.023
Coux, O. (2002). Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 801–847. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.65.1.801
Dahlmann, B. (2016). Mammalian proteasome subtypes: their diversity in structure and function. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 591, 132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.12.012
de la Fuente, M. A., Sasahara, Y., Calamito, M., Antón, I. M., Elkhal, A., Gallego, M. D., et al. (2007). WIP is a chaperone for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 104, 926–931. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610275104
De La Mota-Peynado, A., Lee, S. Y. C., Pierce, B. M., Wani, P., Singh, C. R., and Roelofs, J. (2013). The proteasome-associated protein Ecm29 inhibits proteasomal ATPase activity and in vivo protein degradation by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 29467–29481. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.491662
del Valle Batalla, F., Lennon-Dumenil, A. M., and Yuseff, M. I. (2018). Tuning B cell responses to antigens by cell polarity and membrane trafficking. Mol. Immunol. 101, 140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.06.013
Dennis, M. K., Field, A. S., Burai, R., Ramesh, C., Whitney, K., Bologa, C. G., et al. (2012). Asymmetric proteasome segregation as a mechanism for unequal partitioning of the transcription factor T-bet during T lymphocyte division. Immunity 127, 358–366. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.07.002
Dikic, I. (2017). Proteasomal and autophagic degradation systems. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 1–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-44908
Dobretsov, M., Petkau, G., Hayar, A., and Petkau, E. (2017). Clock scan protocol for image analysis: imagej plugins. J. Vis. Exp. 2017:55819. doi: 10.3791/55819
Fleire, S. J., Goldman, J. P., Carrasco, Y. R., Weber, M., Bray, D., and Batista, F. D. (2006). B cell ligand discrimination through a spreading and contraction response. Science 312, 738–741. doi: 10.1126/science.1123940
Freeman, S. A., Jaumouillé, V., Choi, K., Hsu, B. E., Wong, H. S., Abraham, L., et al. (2015). Toll-like receptor ligands sensitize B-cell receptor signalling by reducing actin-dependent spatial confinement of the receptor. Nat. Commun. 6:7015. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7168
Freeman, S. A., Mizuno, K., Roskelley, C. D., Gold, M. R., Lei, V., and Dang-Lawson, M. (2018). Cofilin-Mediated F-Actin severing is regulated by the rap GTPase and controls the cytoskeletal dynamics that drive lymphocyte spreading and BCR microcluster formation. J. Immunol. 187, 5887–5900. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102233
Gil-Krzewska, A., Saeed, M. B., Oszmiana, A., Fischer, E. R., Lagrue, K., Gahl, W. A., et al. (2017). An actin cytoskeletal barrier inhibits lytic granule release from natural killer cells in chediak-higashi syndrome. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 142, 914–927.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.040
Gorbea, C., Goellner, G. M., Teter, K., Holmes, R. K., and Rechsteiner, M. (2004). Characterization of mammalian Ecm29, a 26 S proteasome-associated protein that localizes to the nucleus and membrane vesicles. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 54849–54861. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410444200
Gorbea, C., Pratt, G., Ustrell, V., Bell, R., Sahasrabudhe, S., Hughes, R. E., et al. (2010). A protein interaction network for Ecm29 links the 26 S proteasome to molecular motors and endosomal components. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 31616–31633. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.154120
Grune, T., Reinheckel, T., North, J. A., Li, R., Bescos, P. B., Shringarpure, R., et al. (2002). Ezrin turnover and cell shape changes catalyzed by proteasome in oxidatively stressed cells. FASEB J. 16, 1602–1610.
Hao, J. J., Carey, G. B., and Zhan, X. (2004). Syk-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation is required for the association of hematopoietic lineage cell-specific protein 1 with lipid rafts and B cell antigen receptor signalosome complex. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 33413–33420. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313564200
Hao, Y. H., Doyle, J. M., Ramanathan, S., Gomez, T. S., Jia, D., Xu, M., et al. (2013). Regulation of WASH-dependent actin polymerization and protein trafficking by ubiquitination. Cell 152, 1051–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.051
Haratake, K., Sato, A., Tsuruta, F., and Chiba, T. (2016). KIAA0368 -deficiency affects disassembly of 26S proteasome under oxidative stress condition. J. Biochem. 159:mvw006. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvw006
Harwood, N. E., and Batista, F. D. (2010). Early events in B cell activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 185–210. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101216
Hornbeck, P. V., Kornhauser, J. M., Tkachev, S., Zhang, B., Skrzypek, E., Murray, B., et al. (2012). PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D261–D270. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1122
Hsu, M., Guo, C., Liou, A. Y., Chang, T., Ng, M., Florea, B. I., et al. (2015). Stage-Dependent axon transport of proteasomes contributes to axon development. Dev. Cell 35, 418–431. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.10.018
Ibañez-Vega, J., Del Valle, Batalla, F., Saez, J. J., Soza, A., and Yuseff, M.-I. (2019a). Proteasome dependent actin remodeling facilitates antigen extraction at the immune synapse of B cells. Front. Immunol. 10:225. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00225
Ibañez-Vega, J., Fuentes, D., Lagos, J., Cancino, J., and Yuseff, M. I. (2019b). Studying organelle dynamics in B cells during immune synapse formation. J. Vis. Exp. 2019, 1–13. doi: 10.3791/59621
Inoue, D., Obino, D., Pineau, J., Farina, F., Gaillard, J., Guerin, C., et al. (2019). Actin filaments regulate microtubule growth at the centrosome. EMBO J. 38:e99630.
Jankowska, K. I., and Burkhardt, J. K. (2017). Analyzing actin dynamics at the immunological synapse. Methods Mol Biol. 1584, 7–29. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6881-7_2
Kelkar, M., Bohec, P., and Charras, G. (2020). Mechanics of the cellular actin cortex: from signalling to shape change. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 66, 69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.05.008
Keppler, S. J., Burbage, M., Gasparrini, F., Hartjes, L., Aggarwal, S., Massaad, M. J., et al. (2018). The lack of WIP binding to actin results in impaired B cell migration and altered humoral immune responses. Cell Rep. 24, 619–629. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.051
Kumari, S., Mak, M., Poh, Y., Tohme, M., Watson, N., Melo, M., et al. (2020). Cytoskeletal tension actively sustains the migratory T-cell synaptic contact. EMBO J. 39:e102783. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019102783
Kwak, K., Akkaya, M., and Pierce, S. K. (2019). B cell signaling in context. Nat. Immunol. 20, 963–969. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0427-429
Lankar, D., Vincent-Schneider, H., Briken, V., Yokozeki, T., Raposo, G., and Bonnerot, C. (2002). Dynamics of major histocompatibility complex class II compartments during B cell receptor-mediated cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 195, 461–472.
Laumonnerie, C., and Solecki, D. J. (2018). Regulation of polarity protein levels in the developing central nervous system. J. Mol. Biol. 430, 3472–3480. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.05.036
Lee, M., Liu, Y. C., Chen, C., Lu, C. H., Lu, S. T., Huang, T. N., et al. (2020). Ecm29-mediated proteasomal distribution modulates excitatory GABA responses in the developing brain. J. Cell Biol. 219:e201903033. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201903033
Lehmann, A., Niewienda, A., Jechow, K., Janek, K., and Enenkel, C. (2010). Ecm29 fulfils quality control functions in proteasome assembly. Mol. Cell 38, 879–888. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.016
Liu, C., Bai, X., Wu, J., Sharma, S., Upadhyaya, A., Dahlberg, C. I. M., et al. (2013). N-WASP is essential for the negative regulation of B cell receptor signaling. PLoS Biol. 11:e1001704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001704
Liu, K., Jones, S., Minis, A., Rodriguez, J., Molina, H., and Steller, H. (2019). PI31 is an adaptor protein for proteasome transport in axons and required for synaptic development. Dev. Cell 50, 509–524.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.06.009
Martín-Cófreces, N. B., Robles-Valero, J., Cabrero, J. R., Mittelbrunn, M., Gordón-Alonso, M., Sung, C. H., et al. (2008). MTOC translocation modulates IS formation and controls sustained T cell signaling. J. Cell Biol. 182, 951–962. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200801014
Mattila, P. K., Batista, F. D., and Treanor, B. (2016). Dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton mediates receptor cross talk: an emerging concept in tuning receptor signaling. J. Cell Biol. 212, 267–280. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201504137
Mlynarczuk-Bialy, I., Doeppner, T. R., Golab, J., Nowis, D., Wilczynski, G. M., Parobczak, K., et al. (2014). Biodistribution and efficacy studies of the proteasome inhibitor BSc2118 in a mouse melanoma model. Transl. Oncol. 7, 570–579. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.07.002
Natkanski, E., Lee, W. Y., Mistry, B., Casal, A., Molloy, J. E., and Tolar, P. (2013). B cells use mechanical energy to discriminate antigen affinities. Science 340, 1587–1590. doi: 10.1126/science.1237572
Obino, D., Farina, F., Malbec, O., Sáez, P. J., Maurin, M., Gaillard, J., et al. (2016). Actin nucleation at the centrosome controls lymphocyte polarity. Nat. Commun. 7:10969. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10969
Otero, M. G., Alloatti, M., Cromberg, L. E., Almenar-Queralt, A., Encalada, S. E., Pozo Devoto, V. M., et al. (2014). Fast axonal transport of the proteasome complex depends on membrane interaction and molecular motor function. J. Cell Sci. 127, 1537–1549. doi: 10.1242/jcs.140780
Pauls, S. D., Hou, S., and Marshall, A. J. (2020). SHIP interacts with adaptor protein Nck and restricts actin turnover in B cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 527, 207–212. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.04.101
Pinto, M., Alves, P., Luis, M., Pedro, J., Ryu, H., Jeon, N., et al. (2016). The proteasome controls presynaptic differentiation through modulation of an on-site pool of polyubiquitinated conjugates. J. Cell Biol. 212, 789–801.
Ramachandran, K. V., and Margolis, S. S. (2017). A mammalian nervous-system-specific plasma membrane proteasome complex that modulates neuronal function. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 419–430. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3389
Reversat, A., Yuseff, M.-I., Lankar, D., Malbec, O., Obino, D., Maurin, M., et al. (2015). Polarity protein Par3 controls B-cell receptor dynamics and antigen extraction at the immune synapse. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 1273–1285. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-09-1373
Ritter, A. T., Asano, Y., Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Griffiths, G. M., Stinchcombe, J. C., Dieckmann, N. M. G., et al. (2015). Actin depletion initiates events leading to granule secretion at the immunological synapse. Immunity 42, 864–876. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.013
Roper, S. I., Wasim, L., Malinova, D., Way, M., Cox, S., and Tolar, P. (2019). B cells extract antigens using Arp2/3-generated actin foci interspersed with linear filaments. eLife 8:e48093. doi: 10.1101/792481
Satpathy, S., Wagner, S. A., Beli, P., Gupta, R., Kristiansen, T. A., Malinova, D., et al. (2015). Systems-wide analysis of BCR signalosomes and downstream phosphorylation and ubiquitylation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11:22. doi: 10.15252/msb.20145880
Schaefer, A., Nethe, M., and Hordijk, P. L. (2012). Ubiquitin links to cytoskeletal dynamics, cell adhesion and migration. Biochem. J. 442, 13–25. doi: 10.1042/BJ20111815
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
Schmidt, C., Berger, T., Groettrup, M., and Basler, M. (2018). Immunoproteasome inhibition impairs T and B cell activation by restraining ERK signaling and proteostasis. Front. Immunol. 9:2386. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02386
Spillane, K. M., and Tolar, P. (2018). Mechanics of antigen extraction in the B cell synapse. Mol. Immunol. 101, 319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.07.018
Tolar, P. (2017). Cytoskeletal control of B cell responses to antigens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 621–634. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.67
Treanor, B., Depoil, D., Gonzalez-Granja, A., Barral, P., Weber, M., Dushek, O., et al. (2009). The membrane skeleton controls diffusion dynamics and signaling through the B cell receptor. Immunity 32, 187–199. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.12.005
Tvorogova, A., Saidova, A., Smirnova, T., and Vorobjev, I. (2018). Dynamic microtubules drive fibroblast spreading. Biol. Open 7:bio038968. doi: 10.1242/bio.038968
Vascotto, F., Lankar, D., Faure-André, G., Vargas, P., Diaz, J., Le Roux, D., et al. (2007). The actin-based motor protein myosin II regulates MHC class II trafficking and BCR-driven antigen presentation. J. Cell Biol. 176, 1007–1019. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200611147
Vora, S., and Phillips, B. (2016). The benefits of local depletion: the centrosome as a scaffold for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. Cell Cycle 15, 2124–2134. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2016.1196306
Wakatsuki, T., Wysolmerski, R. B., and Elson, E. L. (2003). Mechanics of cell spreading: role of myosin II. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1617–1625. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00340
Wang, J. C., and Hammer, J. A. (2020). The role of actin and myosin in antigen extraction by B lymphocytes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 102, 90–104. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.10.017
Yi, J., Wu, X., Chung, A. H., Chen, J. K., Kapoor, T. M., and Hammer, J. A. (2013). Centrosome repositioning in T cells is biphasic and driven by microtubule end-on capture-shrinkage. J. Cell Biol. 202, 779–792. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201301004
Keywords: proteasome, actin cytoskeleton, Ecm29, immune synapse, lysosomes, microtubules, B cell
Citation: Ibañez-Vega J, Del Valle F, Sáez JJ, Guzman F, Diaz J, Soza A and Yuseff MI (2021) Ecm29-Dependent Proteasome Localization Regulates Cytoskeleton Remodeling at the Immune Synapse. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9:650817. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.650817
Received: 08 January 2021; Accepted: 14 April 2021;
Published: 13 May 2021.
Edited by:
Balbino Alarcon, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), SpainReviewed by:
Francisco Sanchez-Madrid, Autonomous University of Madrid, SpainDorothy Lerit, Emory University, United States
Copyright © 2021 Ibañez-Vega, Del Valle, Sáez, Guzman, Diaz, Soza and Yuseff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Andrea Soza, YW5kcmVhLnNvemFAdXNzLmNs; María Isabel Yuseff, bXl1c2VmZkBiaW8ucHVjLmNs
†These authors have contributed equally to this work