
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1586389
This article is part of the Research Topic Critical Care Cardiology for Cardiovascular Emergencies View all 12 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Heart failure is a global health concern, with many patients being unresponsive to medical therapies. In end-stage disease, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) offer an alternative to transplantation, yet their clinical course remains unfavorable, with up to one in four patients dying within a year. Although LVAD implantation aims to alleviate left-sided congestion and reduce right ventricular burden, a significant proportion of patients develop RHF, which is a major driver of morbidity and mortality.The underlying mechanisms leading to RHF remain a subject of debate, with no definitive conclusions reached. Due to the heterogeneity of heart failure pathophysiology, clinical data varies, and the translation of preclinical findings into effective bedside management remains challenging. These factors collectively hinder the precise characterization of RHF mechanisms, with some proposed explanations remaining speculative.Assessing the risk of RHF development based on pathophysiological insights is essential.However, predicting the progression of RHF following LVAD implantation remains difficult due to complex hemodynamic interactions and the lack of established guidelines, often leading to missed opportunities for timely right ventricular (RV) support device implantation.To reduce the incidence of RHF, this review aims to provide insights into RV failure mechanisms and propose a refined predictive approach. Although data in this field is rapidly evolving, explanations and assessment methods have not been significantly updated. This paper consolidates recent findings, presents updated perspectives, and identifies remaining gaps in knowledge.
Keywords: LVAD, Conductance catheter, Left ventricular twist, Pressure-volume loop, right ventricle, score
Received: 02 Mar 2025; Accepted: 26 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nonaka, Lu, Obonyo, Suen, Mcgiffin, Fanning and Fraser. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Hideaki Nonaka, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.