Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiac Rhythmology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1534899

Comparison of prognosis and analysis of related risk factors among three different left atrial appendage occlusion procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation

Provisionally accepted
Xiao-hai Jiang Xiao-hai Jiang Yan-juan Tan Yan-juan Tan Run-zhong Wang Run-zhong Wang Zhong-bao Ruan Zhong-bao Ruan *Li Zhu Li Zhu
  • Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Taizhou People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University,, Taizhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    AbstractBackground Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) serves as an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at high risk of bleeding. The aim of this study was to compare the peri-procedural safety, complete or incomplete occlusion, the incidence of the peri-device leak (PDL), and device-related thrombosis (DRT) among LAAO, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) com-bined with LAAO, and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) combined with LAAO and to explore the risk factors of PDL and incomplete occlusion.Methods382 patients with non-valvular AF who underwent either LAAO alone (n=117), CBA combined with LAAO (n=125), or RFCA combined with LAAO (n=140) were included in the retrospec-tive study. The study assessed peri-procedural complications and imaging results (3 months post-procedure). Multivariable logistic regression was employed to identify risk factors for incomplete occlusion and PDL.ResultsPeri-procedural complication rates were low among all groups, with 2.9% in the RFCA com-bined with the LAAO group. In contrast, the LAAO alone and CBA combined with LAAO groups reported no major complications (p=0.347). At the 3-month follow-up, the incidence of DRT was 1.7% in the LAAO group, 2.4% in the CBA combined with the LAAO group, and 2.1% in the RFCA combined with the LAAO group (p=0.930). Complete occlusion rates were comparable among the groups: 64.8% for CBA combined with LAAO, 62.4% for LAAO alone, and 60.7% for RFCA combined with LAAO (p=0.794). PDL occurred in 33.3% of LAAO-alone patients, 34.4% of CBA combined with LAAO patients, and 38.6% of RFCA combined with LAAO patients (p=0.644). Multivariable analysis identified persistent AF and serum creati-nine (SCr) as independent predictors of PDL and incomplete occlusion.ConclusionPeri-procedural complications, complete occlusion, PDL, and DRT rates were similar across the three treatment strategies. Persistent AF and SCr were significant risk factors for incomplete oc-clusion and PDL. These findings highlight the importance of individualized treatment strategies based on patient-specific risk factors for optimizing outcomes.

    Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation, Left atrial appendage occlusion, endothelialization, peridevice leak, device related thrombosis

    Received: 26 Nov 2024; Accepted: 28 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Tan, Wang, Ruan and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Zhong-bao Ruan, Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Taizhou People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University,, Taizhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.