94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiac Rhythmology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1501716
This article is part of the Research Topic New Challenges in Arrhythmology View all 10 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Aims: Whether the intraprocedural anticoagulation regimen and activated clotting time (ACT) in pulsed field ablation (PFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) are the same as those for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is currently unknown.Our retrospective study included 51 paroxysmal AF patients who underwent PFA (PFA group) and were matched with paroxysmal AF patients who underwent RFCA. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio (no tolerance to anticoagulant regimens and a tolerance of 0.02 on the CHA2DS2-VASc score, left atrial diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction). Compared with the RFCA group, the PFA group had a significantly shorter procedure time but a longer fluoroscopy time. In both groups, an initial heparin dose of 110 U/kg was given. The 30-min ACT in the PFA group (240±95.5 s) was shorter than that in the RFCA group (294.4±82.3 s, P=0.003). The 60-, 90-, and 120-min ACTs were significantly longer in the PFA group. The percentage of 30 min-ACTs in the therapeutic range in the RFCA group (33.3%) was greater than that in the PFA group (15.7%, P=0.038). The time to achieve the target ACT was longer in the PFA group. There were no differences in the incidence of periprocedural thromboembolism or bleeding events between the two groups.Conclusions: Compared with RFCA, PFA was associated with longer intraprocedural ACTs, shorter initial ACTs, fewer initial ACTs in the therapeutic range, and longer times to achieve the target ACT.
Keywords: Radiofrequency catheter ablation, pulsed field ablation, activated clotting time, Atrial Fibrillation, Anticoagulant
Received: 25 Sep 2024; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Chen, Li, Wang, Dai, Xiao, Sun, Xia, Gao and Yin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xiaomeng Yin, First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.