Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Intensive Care Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1461714

Higher Vasoactive Usage Despite Hemodynamic Goals is Associated with Higher Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock

Provisionally accepted
Jorge Arturo Ortega-Hernandez Jorge Arturo Ortega-Hernandez 1*Héctor González-Pacheco Héctor González-Pacheco 1*Diego Araiza Garaygordobil Diego Araiza Garaygordobil 1Rodrigo Gopar-Nieto Rodrigo Gopar-Nieto 1Daniel Sierra-Lara-Martínez Daniel Sierra-Lara-Martínez 1Daniel Manzur-Sandoval Daniel Manzur-Sandoval 1José Luis Briseño-De-La-Cruz José Luis Briseño-De-La-Cruz 1Salvador Mendoza-García Salvador Mendoza-García 1Alvaro Montañez Orozco Alvaro Montañez Orozco 1Arturo Arzate-Ramírez Arturo Arzate-Ramírez 1José Omar Arenas-Díaz José Omar Arenas-Díaz 2César A Gómez-Rodríguez César A Gómez-Rodríguez 1Hector Antonio Santos-Alfaro Hector Antonio Santos-Alfaro 1Jaime Hernández-Montfort Jaime Hernández-Montfort 3Alexandra Arias -Mendoza Alexandra Arias -Mendoza 1
  • 1 Unidad de Cuidados Coronarios, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 2 Interventional Cardiology Unit, National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chavez, Mexico, Mexico
  • 3 Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, New Hampshire, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a severe complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with high mortality. Few studies have examined the selection and subsequent choice of vasoactive agents in CS.This study investigates the impact of vasoactive drug use and in-hospital outcomes among AMI-CS.: 309 patients who underwent pulmonary artery catheterization between 2006-2021 were categorized by the number of vasoactive drugs used (0-1, 2, or > 2). Clinical and 24-hour hemodynamic data were analyzed. Primary outcomes explored the correlation between vasoactive use and in-hospital mortality. Secondary analyses assessed hemodynamic changes and estimated mortality probabilities at different intervals through logistic regression.Results: In total, 57 patients received 0-1, 76 received 2, and 176 received >2 vasoactives. The median age was 61; most were men (82%), and 82.8% had STEMI. End-organ function showed progressive deterioration with escalating vasoactive use. Survival analysis revealed an increased mortality in >2 vasoactive group (HRa=4.62 [2.07-10.32]), achieving ≥5/6 hemodynamic goals did not mitigate mortality ). Subgroup analyses within patients who reached different hemodynamic goals reiterated adverse outcomes associated with >2 vasoactives(P<0.05). Further analysis showed that vasopressin was associated with the highest mortality with a time-dependent fashion (HRDay1,, also levosimendan had similar behavior (HRDay1,] → HRDay30, 0.66 [0.42-1.03]).Conclusions: A significant association between the number of vasoactives and in-hospital mortality was found in AMI-CS, which requires future long-term studies to explore the role of vasoactive drug therapies and early temporary mechanical circulatory support.

    Keywords: Cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction, vasoactive drugs, hemodynamic goals, Mortality, personalized medicine

    Received: 09 Jul 2024; Accepted: 27 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ortega-Hernandez, González-Pacheco, Araiza Garaygordobil, Gopar-Nieto, Sierra-Lara-Martínez, Manzur-Sandoval, Briseño-De-La-Cruz, Mendoza-García, Montañez Orozco, Arzate-Ramírez, Arenas-Díaz, Gómez-Rodríguez, Santos-Alfaro, Hernández-Montfort and Arias -Mendoza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Jorge Arturo Ortega-Hernandez, Unidad de Cuidados Coronarios, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico
    Héctor González-Pacheco, Unidad de Cuidados Coronarios, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.