The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
REVIEW article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Heart Valve Disease
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1506993
Evolving perspectives on aortic stenosis: the increasing importance of evaluating the right ventricle before aortic valve intervention.
Provisionally accepted- 1 King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- 2 St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- 3 Cleveland Clinic London, London, United Kingdom
Aortic stenosis (AS) was historically considered a disease of the left side of the heart, with the main pathophysiological impact being predominantly on the left ventricle (LV). However, progressive pressure overload in AS can initiate a cascade of extra-valvular myocardial remodeling that could also precipitate maladaptive alterations in the structure and function of the right ventricle (RV). The haemodynamic and clinical importance of these changes in patients with AS have been largely underappreciated in the past. Contemporary data indicates that RV dilatation or impairment identifies the AS patients who are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR). It is now increasingly recognised that effective quantitative assessment of the RV plays a key role in delineating the late clinical stage of AS, which could improve patient risk stratification. Despite the increasing emphasis on the pathological significance of RV changes in AS, it remains to be established if earlier detection of these changes can improve the timing for intervention. This review will summarise the features of normal RV physiology and the mechanisms responsible for RV impairment in AS. In addition, we will discuss the multimodality approach to the comprehensive assessment of RV size, function and mechanics in AS patients. Finally, we will review the emerging evidence reinforcing the negative impact of RV dysfunction on clinical outcomes in AS patients treated with AVR.
Keywords: right ventricle, pulmonary hypertension, cardiovascular risk, aortic stenosis, aortic valve replacement
Received: 06 Oct 2024; Accepted: 18 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Androshchuk, Chehab, Wilcox, McDonaugh, Montarello, Rajani, Prendergast, Patterson and Redwood. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Vitaliy Androshchuk, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.